0918 2 MINUTES Meeting of 18 September 2018, 15.00
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ASAMBLEA PARLAMENTARIA EURO-LATINOAMERICANA EURO-LATIN AMERICAN PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLEIA PARLAMENTAR EURO-LATINO-AMERICANA ASSEMBLÉE PARLEMENTAIRE EURO-LATINO- AMÉRICAINE PARLAMENTARISCHE VERSAMMLUNG EUROPA-LATEINAMERIKA Committee on Political Affairs, Security and Human Rights EUAL_PV(2018)0918_2 MINUTES Meeting of 18 September 2018, 15.00 – 18.30 Vienna The meeting opened at 15.20 on 18 September 2018 with Francisco Assis (EP, replacing Co- Chair Artis Pabriks) and Roger Haroldo Rodas Melgar (Parlacen, Co-Chair) in the chair. 1. Adoption of agenda AP102.535v05-00 After a debate on whether the floor should be given to external experts for items 7 and 8, which ended in agreement, the draft agenda was approved as shown in these minutes. Speakers: Roger HAROLDO RODAS MELGAR (Parlacen, Guatemala), Francisco ASSIS (S&D, Portugal), Óscar RONDEROS (Parlasur, Venezuela), Gloria OQUELÍ SOLORZANO (Parlacen, Honduras), Ángel ROZAS (Parlatino, Argentina) and Ramón JÁUREGUI ATONDO (S&D, Spain) 2. Approval of minutes of meetings 5 April 2018, in Panama (Panama) AP102.529v01-00 The minutes were approved. 3. Co-chairs’ announcements Co-Chair Francisco Assis outlined the various items on the agenda of this Committee meeting. He made some procedural comments and informed Members about the available interpretation for this meeting. 4. Draft report on ‘Restructuring sovereign debt’ EP co-rapporteur: Ernest Urtasun (Greens/ALE, Spain) LAC co-rapporteur: Angel Rozas (Parlatino, Argentina) PV\1174694EN.docx PE102.678v02-00 EN EN Consideration of amendments 1- 45 Vote in committee The co-rapporteurs were in agreement on the need to foster an international framework to address the issue of sovereign debt and emphasised experiences, both in the EU and LAC countries, in restructuring such debt. They pointed out that countries needed to strike a balance between their debt repayment obligations and the duties of welfare and social assistance that they owed their citizens. They ended by calling for greater transparency and stressing the need to tackle speculators. The report, as amended, was adopted by the Committee with 27 votes in favour, 6 against and no abstentions. The Chair announced that the deadline for amendments to Plenary had been set for 19 September at 10.00. Speakers: Ernest URTASUN (Greens/ALE, Spain) and Ángel ROZAS (Parlatino, Argentina) 5. Draft report on ‘Regulation of lobbies’ activities in the EU and LAC’ EP co-rapporteur: Claudia Țapardel (S&D, Romania) LAC co-rapporteur: Angel Rozas (Parlatino, Argentina) First consideration of the joint motion for a resolution Francisco Assis, speaking on behalf of the EP co-rapporteur, and other speakers stressed the need for better regulation on lobbying with a view to encouraging transparency. This would require, among other things, distinguishing lawful from non-lawful activities, which would help provide citizens with adequate information on the political decision-making process. Co- rapporteur Ángel Rozas alluded to the need to better protect whistleblowers reporting irregularities in the representation of interests. He and the other speakers welcomed the progressive introduction of the ‘legislative footprint’, which enabled greater traceability concerning the activities of pressure groups in the legislative process. The problem of the ‘revolving door’ was also raised, although Mr Pizarro pointed out that in small countries, which had a limited pool of qualified staff, this situation should be tackled with greater flexibility. Speakers: Francisco ASSIS (S&D, Portugal), Ángel ROZAS (Parlatino, Argentina), Jorge PIZARRO SOTO (CPM UE-Chile) and Renate WEBER (ALDE, Romania) 6. Working documents on ‘Cooperation on criminal justice in the EU and Latin America’ EP co-rapporteur: Fabio Massimo Castaldo (EFDD, Italy) LAC co-rapporteur: Víctor Rolando Sousa (Parlandino, Peru) First consideration of two working documents PE102.678v02-00 2/11 PV\1174694EN.docx EN The rapporteurs agreed that the processes of globalisation and increasing interconnection facilitated by economic and technological progress had facilitated unlawful activities and that those engaging in them had taken advantage of loopholes and uncoordinated or inconsistent national legislation. They stressed that international cooperation in criminal justice matters was essential for the consolidation and defence of the rule of law and democratic political systems, and added that well-functioning systems of criminal law at national level were a prerequisite for successful international cooperation. The speakers stressed how difficult cooperating on this issue was owing to varying definitions of criminal offices and differences in legal traditions and practices from one country to another, but agreed on the need for effective use to be made of international cooperation instruments and for overlaps in efforts to be avoided. Speakers: Fabio CASTALDO (EFDD, Italy), Victor Rolando SOUSA (Parlandino, Peru) and Ramón JÁUREGUI ATONDO (S&D, Spain) 7. Topic for debate: ‘The humanitarian crisis resulting from the massive emigration of Venezuelan citizens’, exchange of views with: Alejandro Guidi (Senior Regional Advisor for the Americas, International Organisation for Migration [IOM]) Juan Carlos Murillo (Deputy Director Americas Bureau, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [UNHCR]) Mr Guidi (IOM) and Mr Murillo (UNHCR) presented the latest data on Venezuelan citizens fleeing their country and spoke of the effects that this migration was having on the neighbouring countries. They highlighted the magnitude and complexity of the problem, outlined the profiles of people fleeing Venezuela, which included many highly vulnerable groups, and stressed the need to guarantee migrants food and basic services. They warned that, despite the generous response offered by the host countries, the magnitude of the exodus was such that it was pushing the response capacity of these countries to the limit and could lead to outbreaks of xenophobia. Many participants criticised the Venezuelan government’s policies and its crackdown against its people, which, they claimed, was having tragic consequences on the local population and negative effects on the neighbouring countries. They agreed on the need for a regional response to the crisis and the support of the international community. Some other speakers, however, criticised the focus on Venezuela, which ignored the other migration crises taking place in the Americas, particularly on the border with the USA or in Europe, and blamed the sanctions imposed on Venezuela for the situation in that country. Speakers: Alejandro GUIDI (OIM), Juan Carlos MURILLO (UNHCR), José Inacio FARIA (PPE, Portugal), Óscar RONDEROS (Parlasur, Venezuela), Ángel MEDINA DEVIS (Parlatino, Venezuela), Javier COUSO PERMUY (GUE/NGL, Spain), Victor SOUSA (Parlandino, Peru), Joao PIMENTA LOPEZ (GUE/NGL, Portugal), Fausto COBO MONTALVO (Parlandino, Ecuador), Carlos ZORRINHO (S&D, Portugal), Pablo GONZÁLEZ (Parlatino, Uruguay), Renate WEBER (ALDE, Romania), Daniel CAGGIANI PV\1174694EN.docx 3/11 PE102.678v02-00 EN (Parlasur, Uruguay), Luis MORLOTE RIVAS (Parlatino, Cuba), Tucapel JIMÉNEZ (Parlandino, Chile), Gloria OQUELÍ SOLORZANO (Parlacen, Honduras), Óscar RONDEROS (Parlasur, Venezuela), Francisco ASSIS (S&D, Portugal) and William MILLESON (Parlatino, Curação) 8. Topic for debate: ‘The situation in Brazil following the ruling of the Brazilian Supreme Court against Lula da Silva’, exchange of views with: Claudia Zilla (Head of Research Division for the Americas) German Institute for International and Security Affairs (Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP)) Ms Zilla outlined a series of factors affecting the electoral process, such as the new electoral law, the prosecution of the candidate Lula da Silva and the rejection of his appeal, which had caused him to pull out of the race, the growing disaffection and political polarisation among Brazilians and outbreaks of politically-motivated violence. In the ensuing exchange of views, the speakers debated the extent to which the rule of law and separation of powers were being respected in Brazil, the instrumentalisation of the judicial system for political ends (the ‘judicialisation’ of politics), the use and abuse of the law to dominate less powerful groups (‘lawfare’), and the uncertainties of the post-election period, with a parliament expected to have more, but smaller, political parties. In general, the radicalisation of politics in Brazil was stressed. The position of the Army in the new post- electoral political landscape was also alluded to. Speakers: Claudia Zilla (SWP), Julia PERIÉ (Parlasur, Argentina), José Inacio FARIA (PPE, Portugal), Joao PIMENTA LOPEZ (GUE/NGL, Portugal), Edgar MEJÍA AGUILAR (Parlatino, Bolivia), Fabio CASTALDO (EFDD, Italy), Diego MANSILLA (Parlasur, Argentina), Pablo GONZÁLEZ (Parlatino, Uruguay), Iuliano GIUSEPPE (CESE), Ana MIRANDA (Greens/ALE, Spain), Pamela AGUIRRE (Parlandino, Ecuador) and Francisco ASSIS (S&D, Portugal) 9. Proposals for reports and topics for debate in committee meetings during 2019/2020 Gustavo PENADÉS (Parlasur, Uruguay) asked for the next committee meeting to consider the possibility of the Eurolat Assembly adopting a declaration condemning the Armenian genocide. Mr Penadés was informed that his request would be forwarded to the Bureau for consideration. 10. Other business Ángel MEDINA DEVIS (Parlatino, Venezuela), spoke out against the arrest and detention in solitary confinement in a Venezuelan prison, without access