DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching Fourth edition © 2020. Published by the American Dairy Science Association®, the American Society of Animal Science, and the Poultry Science Association. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). American Dairy Science Association® American Society of Animal Science Poultry Science Association 1800 South Oak Street, Suite 100 PO Box 7410 4114C Fieldstone Road Champaign, IL 61820 Champaign, IL 61826 Champaign, IL 61822 www.adsa.org www.asas.org www.poultryscience.org ISBN: 978-0-9634491-5-3 (PDF) ISBN: 978-1-7362930-0-3 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-9649811-2-6 (PDF) 978-0-9634491-4-6 (ePub) 978-1-7362930-1-0 (ePub) 978-0-9649811-3-3 (ePub) Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 4th edition (2020) Senior Editorial Committee Cassandra B. Tucker, University of California Davis (representing the American Dairy Science Association®) Michael D. MacNeil, Delta G (representing the American Society of Animal Science) A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia (representing the Poultry Science Association) Ag Guide 4th edition authors Chapter 1: Institutional Policies Chapter 7: Dairy Cattle Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University, Chair Cassandra Tucker, University of California Davis, Chair Deana Jones, ARS USDA Nigel Cook, University of Wisconsin–Madison Gretchen Hill, Michigan State University Marina von Keyserlingk, University of British Columbia James Murray, University of California Davis Peter Krawczel, University of Tennessee Chapter 2: Agricultural Animal Health Care Chapter 8: Horses Frank F. Bartol, Auburn University, Chair Sarah A. Reed, University of Connecticut Johann Coetzee, Kansas State University Donald C. Lay Jr., ARS USDA Cia Johnson, American Veterinary Medical Association Timothy B. Lescun, Purdue University Wendy Underwood, American Veterinary Medical Association Chapter 9: Swine Michael Martin, North Carolina Department of Agriculture Gretchen Hill, Michigan State University and Consumer Services Donald C. Lay Jr., ARS USDA Scott Radcliffe, Purdue University Chapter 3: Husbandry, Housing, and Biosecurity Brian Richert, Purdue University Darrin Karcher, Purdue University, Chair Marcia Endres, University of Minnesota Chapter 10: Sheep and Goats Rick Grant, William H. Miner Agricultural Research Michael L. Thonney, Cornell University Institute Daniel F. Waldron, Texas A&M University (retired) Frank Mitloehner, University of California Davis Gosia Zobel, AgResearch, New Zealand Mark Estienne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Michael D. MacNeil, Delta G & State University Ken Koelkebeck, University of Illinois Poultry Science Association Editorial Committee (poultry species chapters) Chapter 4: Environmental Enrichment A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia Janeen Salak-Johnson, Oklahoma State University, Chair Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University Donald C. Lay Jr., ARS USDA Karen Christensen, Tyson Foods Kathryn Proudfoot, The Ohio State University Ken Koelkebeck, University of Illinois Emily Miller-Cushon, University of Florida Maja Makagon, University of California Davis Chapter 11: Meat-Type Poultry Marisa Erasmus, Purdue University Colin Scanes, University of Arkansas, Chair Kate Barger-Weathers, Cobb-Vantress Inc. Chapter 5: Animal Handling and Transport Dave Hermes, Purdue University Temple Grandin, Colorado State University, Chair Bill Dozier, Auburn University Casey W. Ritz, University of Georgia Karen Christensen, Tyson Foods Inc. Derek Haley, University of Guelph Anne-Marie Neeteson, Aviagen Inc. Yi Liang, University of Arkansas Aaron Kiess, Mississippi State University Chapter 6: Beef Cattle Joel S. Caton, North Dakota State University Michael Galyean, Texas Tech University Ron Lemenager, Purdue University Greg Lardy, North Dakota State University Michael Looper, University of Arkansas Clinton Krehbiel, University of Nebraska Continued Steven Zinn, University of Connecticut Chapter 12: Egg-Type Poultry Chapter 13: Waterfowl Ken Koelkebeck, University of Illinois, Chair Greg Fraley, Purdue University, Chair Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University Mike Lilburn, The Ohio State University Karen Schwean-Lardner, University of Saskatchewan Mamduh Sifri, Sifri Solutions LLC Craig Coufal, Texas A&M University Xixi Chen, Maple Leaf Farms Inc. Janice Siegford, Michigan State University Darrin Karcher, Purdue University A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia Maja Makagon, University of California Davis Heng-wei Cheng, ARS USDA/Purdue University Pat Wakenell, Purdue University Susan Fraley, Purdue University Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 3rd edition (2010) Writing Committee John McGlone, PhD, Co-Chair Janice Swanson, PhD, Co-Chair Steven Ford, PhD Wendy Underwood, DVM Frank Mitloehner, PhD Joy Mench, PhD Temple Grandin, PhD Terry Mader, PhD Pamela Ruegg, DVM Susan Eicher, PhD Carolyn Stull, PhD Patricia Hester, PhD Gregory Lewis, PhD Janeen Salak-Johnson, PhD Michael Galyean, PhD, Liaison to the FASS Board Subcommittees Institutional Policies Dairy Cattle Stephen Ford, PhD, Chair Pamela Ruegg, DVM, and Susan Eicher, PhD, Co-Chairs James Swearengen, DVM Bill Bickert, PhD Don Lay, PhD Randy Shaver, PhD W. Ronald Butler, PhD Nigel Cook, BS, MRCVS Frank Bartol, PhD Paul Fricke, PhD Sheila McGuirk, PhD, DVM Agricultural Animal Health Care Doug Reinemann, PhD Wendy Underwood, DVM, Chair Michele Bailey, DVM Horses Steven Berry, DVM Carolyn Stull, PhD, Chair Gail Golab, PhD, DVM Anne Rodiek, PhD Robert Coleman, PhD Husbandry, Housing, and Biosecurity Sarah Ralston, VMD, PhD Frank Mitloehner, PhD, Chair Donald Topliff, PhD James Swearengen, DVM Suzanne Millman, PhD Curt Gooch, PE Pius Mwangi Ndewga, PhD Poultry Larry Jacobson, PhD Patricia Hester, PhD, Chair Ken Anderson, PhD Environmental Enrichment Inma Estevez, PhD Joy Mench, PhD, Chair Ken Koelkebeck, PhD Ruth Newberry, PhD Sally Noll, PhD Suzanne Millman, PhD Robert Porter, PhD, DVM Cassandra Tucker, PhD Carl Mike Turk, BS Larry Katz, PhD Bruce Webster, PhD Animal Handling and Transport Sheep and Goats Temple Grandin, PhD, Chair Gregory Lewis, PhD, Chair Joseph Stookey, PhD William Gavin, DVM Mhairi Sutherland, PhD Arthur L. Goetsch, PhD A. Bruce Webster, PhD J. Bret Taylor, PhD Carolyn Stull, PhD Michael Thonney, PhD Jeffrey Hill, PhD Swine Beef Cattle Janeen Salak-Johnson, PhD, Chair Terry Mader, PhD, Chair Joe Cassady, PhD Allen Trenkle, PhD Matthew B. Wheeler, PhD James W. Oltjen, PhD Anna Johnson, PhD Tami Brown-Brandl, PhD John Arthington, PhD Larry Hollis, DVM Scott Willard, PhD Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, 1st revised edition (1999) Stanley Curtis, FASFAS liaison to the steering and development committee Guide Revision Committee Joy A. Mench, Chair Margaret E. Benson James V. Craig Katherine A. Houpt John J. McGlone Jack L. Albright Leslie L. Christianson Adele P. Douglass William G. Kvasnicka Neal R. Merchen Subcommittees Beef Horses Sheep and Goats Neal R. Merchen, Chair Katherine A. Houpt, Chair Margaret E. Benson, Chair G. LeRoy Hahn Harold F. Hintz Frank C. Hinds William G. Kvasnicka Sandi Lieb Carl S. Menzies Michael L. Galyean James A. DeShazer Cindy B. Wolf David P. Hutcheson K. Douglas Butler Dexter W. Johnson Janice C. Swanson Stephen G. Jackson Larry S. Katz Thomas Tobin Christine S. F. Williams Dairy Cattle and Veal Jack L. Albright, Chair Poultry Swine Ruth Blauwiekel James V. Craig, Chair John J. McGlone, Chair Kenneth E. Olson Gerald B. Haventsein J. Joe Ford William G. Bickert Karl E. Nestor Paul L. Sundberg James L. Morrill Jr. Paul B. Siegel Leslie L. Christianson Carolyn L. Stull William F. Dean E. T. Kornegay Kenneth K. Kruger Lisa Tokach Graham H. Purchase Garrett L. Van Wicklen Committees for the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, 1st edition (1988) Steering Committee Joy A. Mench, Chair Alden Booren Glenn Gray Kirklyn Kerr David L. Zartman Jack L. Albright Leslie L. Christianson Virgil Hays Alvin Melliere Guide Development Committee Stanley E. Curtis, Chair Jack L. Albright Harold W. Gonyou John J. McGlone James V. Craig Katherine A. Houpt W. Ray Stricklin Table of Contents PREFACE x CHAPTER 1: INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES 1 CHAPTER 2: AGRICULTURAL ANIMAL HEALTH CARE 9 CHAPTER 3: HUSBANDRY, HOUSING, AND BIOSECURITY 17 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT 30 CHAPTER 5: ANIMAL HANDLING AND TRANSPORT 54 CHAPTER 6: BEEF CATTLE 76 CHAPTER 7: DAIRY CATTLE 92 CHAPTER 8: HORSES 113 CHAPTER 9: SWINE 127 CHAPTER 10: DOMESTIC SHEEP AND GOATS 141 CHAPTER 11: MEAT-TYPE POULTRY 156 CHAPTER 12: EGG-TYPE POULTRY 177 CHAPTER 13: WATERFOWL 199 APPENDIX I U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training 208 INDEX 209 viii ix PREFACE This is the fourth edition of the Guide for the Care the Ag Guide. All chapters were updated, revised, and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and or rewritten, with the extent of revision of any given Teaching, commonly known as the Ag Guide. This chapter determined by progress in the academic lit- edition builds upon and replaces previous versions erature pertaining to subjects covered in the chapter. of the Ag Guide published in 1988, 1999, and 2010. Three new poultry chapters were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aalseth Aaron Aarup Aasen Aasheim Abair Abanatha Abandschon Abarca Abarr Abate Abba Abbas Abbate Abbe Abbett Abbey Abbott Abbs
    BUSCAPRONTA www.buscapronta.com ARQUIVO 35 DE PESQUISAS GENEALÓGICAS 306 PÁGINAS – MÉDIA DE 98.500 SOBRENOMES/OCORRÊNCIA Para pesquisar, utilize a ferramenta EDITAR/LOCALIZAR do WORD. A cada vez que você clicar ENTER e aparecer o sobrenome pesquisado GRIFADO (FUNDO PRETO) corresponderá um endereço Internet correspondente que foi pesquisado por nossa equipe. Ao solicitar seus endereços de acesso Internet, informe o SOBRENOME PESQUISADO, o número do ARQUIVO BUSCAPRONTA DIV ou BUSCAPRONTA GEN correspondente e o número de vezes em que encontrou o SOBRENOME PESQUISADO. Número eventualmente existente à direita do sobrenome (e na mesma linha) indica número de pessoas com aquele sobrenome cujas informações genealógicas são apresentadas. O valor de cada endereço Internet solicitado está em nosso site www.buscapronta.com . Para dados especificamente de registros gerais pesquise nos arquivos BUSCAPRONTA DIV. ATENÇÃO: Quando pesquisar em nossos arquivos, ao digitar o sobrenome procurado, faça- o, sempre que julgar necessário, COM E SEM os acentos agudo, grave, circunflexo, crase, til e trema. Sobrenomes com (ç) cedilha, digite também somente com (c) ou com dois esses (ss). Sobrenomes com dois esses (ss), digite com somente um esse (s) e com (ç). (ZZ) digite, também (Z) e vice-versa. (LL) digite, também (L) e vice-versa. Van Wolfgang – pesquise Wolfgang (faça o mesmo com outros complementos: Van der, De la etc) Sobrenomes compostos ( Mendes Caldeira) pesquise separadamente: MENDES e depois CALDEIRA. Tendo dificuldade com caracter Ø HAMMERSHØY – pesquise HAMMERSH HØJBJERG – pesquise JBJERG BUSCAPRONTA não reproduz dados genealógicos das pessoas, sendo necessário acessar os documentos Internet correspondentes para obter tais dados e informações. DESEJAMOS PLENO SUCESSO EM SUA PESQUISA.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Behaviour, Animal Welfare and the Scientific Study of Affect
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 5-2009 Animal Behaviour, Animal Welfare and the Scientific Study of Affect David Fraser University of British Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/emotio Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Comparative Psychology Commons, and the Other Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fraser, D. (2009). Animal behaviour, animal welfare and the scientific study of affect. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(3), 108-117. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Animal Behaviour, Animal Welfare and the Scientific Study of Affect David Fraser University of British Columbia KEYWORDS animal behaviour, animal welfare, affect, emotion, qualitative research ABSTRACT Many questions about animal welfare involve the affective states of animals (pain, fear, distress) and people look to science to clarify these issues as a basis for practices, policies and standards. However, the science of the mid twentieth century tended to be silent on matters of animal affect for both philosophical and methodological reasons. Philosophically, under the influence of Positivism many scientists considered that the affective states of animals fall outside the scope of science. Certain methodological features of the research also favoured explanations that did not involve affect. The features included the tendency to rely on abstract, quantitative measures rather than description, to use controlled experiments more than naturalistic observation, and to focus on measures of central tendency (means, medians) rather than individual differences.
    [Show full text]
  • February 19, 2015 FREEDOM of INFORMATION SUMMARY MIF 900-009 F10 Brand ANTISEPTIC BARRIER OINTMENT
    Date of Index Listing: February 19, 2015 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION SUMMARY ORIGINAL REQUEST FOR ADDITION TO THE INDEX OF LEGALLY MARKETED UNAPPROVED NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR MINOR SPECIES MIF 900-009 F10 brand ANTISEPTIC BARRIER OINTMENT (benzalkonium chloride and polyhexanide topical ointment) Raptors, Pet Birds, Captive Small Mammals, Captive Reptiles, and Captive Exotic/Zoo Mammals “For the treatment of mild and localized cases of bumblefoot (pododermatitis) in caged raptors and pet birds.” “For use as a topical antiseptic for more severe cases of bumblefoot to assist healing after surgery in caged raptors and pet birds.” “For use as a topical antiseptic for surface wounds on raptors, pet birds, captive small mammals, captive reptiles, and captive exotic/zoo mammals.” Requested by: Health and Hygiene (Pty) Ltd Freedom of Information Summary MIF 900-009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION: ........................................................................... 1 II. EFFECTIVENESS AND TARGET ANIMAL SAFETY: ............................................. 2 A. Findings of the Qualified Expert Panel: ..................................................... 2 B. Literature Considered by the Qualified Expert Panel: .................................. 4 III. USER SAFETY: .......................................................................................... 8 IV. AGENCY CONCLUSIONS: ............................................................................ 9 A. Determination of Eligibility for Indexing: .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Agricultural Science and Technology
    Career & Technical Education Curriculum Alignment with Common Core ELA & Math Standards Principles of Agricultural Science and Technology AGRICULTURAL CAREER CLUSTER CAREER MAJORS/CAREER PATHWAYS Animal Science Systems Agriscience Exploration (7th-8thGrade) - (no credit toward career major) Recommended Courses Principles of Agricultural Science & Technology Agriscience Animal Science Animal Technology Equine Science Adv. Animal Science Small Animal Tech Veterinary Science Elective Courses Ag. Math Food Science & Technology Food Processing, Dist. & Mkt. Aquaculture Ag. Sales and Marketing Ag. Construction Skills Ag. Power & Machinery Operation Agri-Biology Adv. Ag. Economics and Agribusiness Ag. Business/Farm Mgmt Ag. Employability Skills Leadership Dynamics Business Management Marketing Management * Other Career and Technical Education Courses Other Career and Technical Education courses directly related to the student’s Career Major/Career Pathway. “Bolded” courses are the “primary recommended courses” for this career major/career pathway. At least 3 of the 4 courses should come from this group of courses. To complete a career major, students must earn four career-related credits within the career major. Three of the four credits should come from the recommended courses for that major. NOTE: Agribiology is an interdisciplinary course, which meets the graduation requirements for Life Science. Agriscience Interdisciplinary course also meets the graduation requirements for Life Science. Agriculture Math is an interdisciplinary course, which may be offered for Math Credit. KENTUCKY CAREER PATHWAY/PROGRAM OF STUDY TEMPLATE COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY: CLUSTER: Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources HIGH SCHOOL (S): PATHWAY: Animal Science Systems PROGRAM: Agricultural Education REQUIRED COURSES CREDENTIAL SOCIAL CERTIFICATE GRADE ENGLISH MATH SCIENCE RECOMMENDED ELECTIVE COURSES STUDIES OTHER ELECTIVE COURSES DIPLOMA CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION COURSES DEGREE 9 Principles of English 1 Alegbra 1 Earth Science Survey of SS Health/PE Ag.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications of Members, 1930-1954
    THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY PUBLICATIONS OF MEMBERS 1930 • 1954 PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY . 1955 COPYRIGHT 1955, BY THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, PRINCETON, N.J. CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY 9 DIRECTORY OF INSTITUTE MEMBERS, 1930-1954 205 MEMBERS WITH APPOINTMENTS OF LONG TERM 265 TRUSTEES 269 buH FOREWORD FOREWORD Publication of this bibliography marks the 25th Anniversary of the foundation of the Institute for Advanced Study. The certificate of incorporation of the Institute was signed on the 20th day of May, 1930. The first academic appointments, naming Albert Einstein and Oswald Veblen as Professors at the Institute, were approved two and one- half years later, in initiation of academic work. The Institute for Advanced Study is devoted to the encouragement, support and patronage of learning—of science, in the old, broad, undifferentiated sense of the word. The Institute partakes of the character both of a university and of a research institute j but it also differs in significant ways from both. It is unlike a university, for instance, in its small size—its academic membership at any one time numbers only a little over a hundred. It is unlike a university in that it has no formal curriculum, no scheduled courses of instruction, no commitment that all branches of learning be rep- resented in its faculty and members. It is unlike a research institute in that its purposes are broader, that it supports many separate fields of study, that, with one exception, it maintains no laboratories; and above all in that it welcomes temporary members, whose intellectual development and growth are one of its principal purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Science LEVEL: Forms 4 & 5 TOPIC: AQUAPONICS
    SUBJECT: Agricultural Science LEVEL: Forms 4 & 5 TOPIC: AQUAPONICS CSEC Agricultural Science Syllabus SECTION A: Introduction to Agriculture 1. Agricultural Science and Agriculture Specific objectives: 1.3 Describe conventional and non-conventional crops and livestock farming systems (aquaponics, hydroponics, grow box, trough culture, urban and peri-urban farming) AQUAPONICS This a system that combines both aquaculture (rearing on fish inland) and hydroponics (growing of plants in water). Aquaponics = Aquaculture + Hydroponics A farmer can get two products from an aquaponics system: - Primary or main products are crops/ plants - Secondary product is the fish Parts of an Aquaponics System The main parts (components) of an aquaponics system are: 1. Rearing Tank – where the fishes grow 2. Growing Bed – where the plants are located 3. Water Pump and tubing – Pump is located at the lowest point of the system and used to push water back to the upper level. 4. Aeration system (air pump, air stone, filter, tubing) – to provide oxygen 5. Solid Removal/ sedimentation tank – to remove solid particles which the plant cannot absorb and may block the tubing etc. 6. Bio-filter – the location at which the nitrification bacteria can grow and convert ammonia to nitrates. 7. Sump – lowest point in the system to catch water. The pump can be placed here. Lifeforms in an Aquaponics system • Fishes • Plants • Bacteria These three living entities each rely on the other to live. Fishes Fishes are used in an aquaponics system to provide nutrients for the plants. These nutrients come from their fecal matter and urine (which contains ammonia) and other waste from their bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Aspects of Emotions in Fish
    Behavioural Processes 100 (2013) 153–159 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Behavioural Processes jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/behavproc Functional aspects of emotions in fish ∗ Silje Kittilsen Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Norway a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: There is an ongoing scientific discussion on whether fish have emotions, and if so how they experience Received 19 March 2013 them? The discussion has incorporated important areas such as brain anatomy and function, physiological Received in revised form and behavioural responses, and the cognitive abilities that fish possess. Little attention has however, been 10 September 2013 directed towards what functional aspects emotions ought to have in fish. If fish have emotions – why? Accepted 11 September 2013 The elucidation of this question and an assessment of the scientific evidences of emotions in fish in an evolutionary and functional framework would represent a valuable contribution in the discussion on Keywords: whether fish are emotional creatures. Here parts of the vast amount of literature from both biology and Emotions Behaviour psychology relating to the scientific field of emotions, animal emotion, and the functional aspects that Cognition emotions fulfil in the lives of humans and animals are reviewed. Subsequently, by viewing fish behaviour, Psychology physiology and cognitive abilities in the light of this functional framework it is possible to infer what Fish functions emotions may serve in fish. This approach may contribute to the vital running discussion on Evolution the subject of emotions in fish. In fact, if it can be substantiated that emotions are likely to serve a function in fish similar to that of other higher vertebrate species, the notion that fish do have emotions will be strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition*
    AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition* Members of the Panel on Euthanasia Steven Leary, DVM, DACLAM (Chair); Fidelis Pharmaceuticals, High Ridge, Missouri Wendy Underwood, DVM (Vice Chair); Indianapolis, Indiana Raymond Anthony, PhD (Ethicist); University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska Samuel Cartner, DVM, MPH, PhD, DACLAM (Lead, Laboratory Animals Working Group); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Temple Grandin, PhD (Lead, Physical Methods Working Group); Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Cheryl Greenacre, DVM, DABVP (Lead, Avian Working Group); University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee Sharon Gwaltney-Brant, DVM, PhD, DABVT, DABT (Lead, Noninhaled Agents Working Group); Veterinary Information Network, Mahomet, Illinois Mary Ann McCrackin, DVM, PhD, DACVS, DACLAM (Lead, Companion Animals Working Group); University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Robert Meyer, DVM, DACVAA (Lead, Inhaled Agents Working Group); Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi David Miller, DVM, PhD, DACZM, DACAW (Lead, Reptiles, Zoo and Wildlife Working Group); Loveland, Colorado Jan Shearer, DVM, MS, DACAW (Lead, Animals Farmed for Food and Fiber Working Group); Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Tracy Turner, DVM, MS, DACVS, DACVSMR (Lead, Equine Working Group); Turner Equine Sports Medicine and Surgery, Stillwater, Minnesota Roy Yanong, VMD (Lead, Aquatics Working Group); University of Florida, Ruskin, Florida AVMA Staff Consultants Cia L. Johnson, DVM, MS, MSc; Director,
    [Show full text]
  • Urban and Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground
    Urban and Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-20-4 ISSN 0194-4088 05 04 03 02 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Urban and Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 1-887383-20-4 (alk. paper) 1. Urban agriculture. 2. Land use, Urban. 3. Agriculture--Economic aspects. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. S494.5.U72 U74 2002 630'.91732-dc21 2002005851 CIP Task Force Report No. 138 May 2002 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa Task Force Members Lorna Michael Butler (Cochair and Lead Coauthor), College of Agriculture, Departments of Sociology and Anthropology, Iowa State University, Ames Dale M. Maronek (Cochair and Lead Coauthor), Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater Contributing Authors Nelson Bills, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Tim D. Davis, Texas A&M University Research and Extension Center, Dallas Julia Freedgood, American Farmland Trust, Northampton, Massachusetts Frank M. Howell, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State John Kelly, Public Service and Agriculture, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina Lawrence W. Libby, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus Kameshwari Pothukuchi, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan Diane Relf, Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg John K.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals: Responsibilities, Recognition, and Intervention
    Guidelines for Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals: Responsibilities, Recognition, and Intervention Introduction Animals can experience pain and distress. It is the ethical and legal obligation of all personnel involved with the use of animals in research to reduce or eliminate pain and distress in research animals whenever such actions do not interfere with the research objectives. The Institute/Center Animal Care and Use Committee (IC ACUC) has the delegated responsibility and accountability for ensuring that all animals under their oversight are used humanely and in accordance with a number of Federal Regulations and policies.2,21,29,30,32 Key to fulfilling the responsibilities for both the Principal Investigator (PI) and the IC ACUC are to: • understand the legal requirements, • be able to distinguish pain and distress in animals from their normal state, • relieve or minimize the pain and distress appropriately; and • establish humane endpoints. Regulatory Requirements and IC ACUC Responsibilities The IC ACUC must ensure that all aspects of the animal study proposal (ASP) that may cause more than transient pain and/or distress are addressed; alternatives6 to painful or distressful procedures are considered; that methods, anesthetics, and analgesics to minimize or eliminate pain and distress are included when these methods do not interfere with the research objectives; and that humane endpoints have been established for all situations where more than transient pain and distress can not be avoided or eliminated. Whenever possible, death or severe pain and distress should be avoided as endpoints. A written scientific justification is required to be included in the ASP for any more than transient painful or distressful procedure that cannot be relieved or minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • This Cover and Their Final Version Extended
    then this cover and their final version extended and whether it is group 1 or Peterson :_:::_.,·. ,_,_::_ ·:. -. \")_>(-_>·...·,: . .>:_'_::°::· ··:_-'./·' . /_:: :·.·· . =)\_./'-.:":_ .... -- __ · ·, . ', . .·· . Stlpervisot1s t~pe>rt ~fld declaration J:h; s3pervi;o(,r;u~f dompietethisreport,. .1ign .the (leclaratton andtfien iiv~.ihe pna:1 ·tersion·...· ofth€7 essay; with this coyerattachedt to the Diploma Programme coordinator. .. .. .. ::,._,<_--\:-.·/·... ":";":":--.-.. ·. ---- .. ,>'. ·.:,:.--: <>=·. ;:_ . .._-,..-_,- -::,· ..:. 0 >>i:mi~ ~;!~;:91'.t~~~1TAt1.tte~) c P1~,§.~p,rmmeht, ;J} a:,ir:lrapriate, on the candidate's perforrnance, .111e. 9q1Jtext ·;n •.w111ctrth~ ..cahdtdatei:m ·.. thft; J'e:~e,~rch.·forf fle ...~X: tendfKI essay, anydifflcu/ties ef1COUntered anq ftCJW thes~\WfJ(fj ()VfJfCOfflf! ·(see .· •tl1i! ext~nciede.ssay guide). The .cpncl(ldipg interview .(vive . vope) ,mt;}y P.fOvidtli .US$ftJf .informf.ltion: pom1r1~nt~ .can .flelp the ex:amr1er award.a ··tevetfot criterion K.th9lisJtcjudgrpentJ. po not. .comment ~pverse personal circumstan9~s that•· m$iiybave . aff.ected the candidate.\lftl'1e cr.rrtotJnt ottime.spiimt qa;ndidate w~s zero, Jt04 must.explain tf1is, fn particular holft!1t was fhf;Jn ppssible .to ;;1.uthentic;at? the essa~ canciidaJe'sown work. You rnay a-ttachan .aclditfonal sherJtJf th.ere isinspfffpi*?nt f pr1ce here,·.···· · Overall, I think this paper is overambitious in its scope for the page length / allowed. I ~elieve it requires furt_her_ editing, as the "making of" portion takes up too ~ large a portion of the essay leaving inadequate page space for reflections on theory and social relevance. The section on the male gaze or the section on race relations in comedy could have served as complete paper topics on their own (although I do appreciate that they are there).
    [Show full text]
  • Do “Prey Species” Hide Their Pain? Implications for Ethical Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
    Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research 2 (2020) 216–236 brill.com/jaae Do “Prey Species” Hide Their Pain? Implications for Ethical Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Larry Carbone Independent scholar; 351 Buena Vista Ave #703E, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA [email protected] Abstract Accurate pain evaluation is essential for ethical review of laboratory animal use. Warnings that “prey species hide their pain,” encourage careful accurate pain assess- ment. In this article, I review relevant literature on prey species’ pain manifestation through the lens of the applied ethics of animal welfare oversight. If dogs are the spe- cies whose pain is most reliably diagnosed, I argue that it is not their diet as predator or prey but rather because dogs and humans can develop trusting relationships and because people invest time and effort in canine pain diagnosis. Pain diagnosis for all animals may improve when humans foster a trusting relationship with animals and invest time into multimodal pain evaluations. Where this is not practical, as with large cohorts of laboratory mice, committees must regard with skepticism assurances that animals “appear” pain-free on experiments, requiring thorough literature searches and sophisticated pain assessments during pilot work. Keywords laboratory animal ‒ pain ‒ animal welfare ‒ ethics ‒ animal behavior 1 Introduction As a veterinarian with an interest in laboratory animal pain management, I have read articles and reviewed manuscripts on how to diagnose a mouse in pain. The challenge, some authors warn, is that mice and other “prey species” © LARRY CARBONE, 2020 | doi:10.1163/25889567-bja10001 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license.
    [Show full text]