DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching Fourth edition © 2020. Published by the American Dairy Science Association®, the American Society of Animal Science, and the Poultry Science Association. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). American Dairy Science Association® American Society of Animal Science Poultry Science Association 1800 South Oak Street, Suite 100 PO Box 7410 4114C Fieldstone Road Champaign, IL 61820 Champaign, IL 61826 Champaign, IL 61822 www.adsa.org www.asas.org www.poultryscience.org ISBN: 978-0-9634491-5-3 (PDF) ISBN: 978-1-7362930-0-3 (PDF) ISBN: 978-0-9649811-2-6 (PDF) 978-0-9634491-4-6 (ePub) 978-1-7362930-1-0 (ePub) 978-0-9649811-3-3 (ePub) Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 4th edition (2020) Senior Editorial Committee Cassandra B. Tucker, University of California Davis (representing the American Dairy Science Association®) Michael D. MacNeil, Delta G (representing the American Society of Animal Science) A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia (representing the Poultry Science Association) Ag Guide 4th edition authors Chapter 1: Institutional Policies Chapter 7: Dairy Cattle Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University, Chair Cassandra Tucker, University of California Davis, Chair Deana Jones, ARS USDA Nigel Cook, University of Wisconsin–Madison Gretchen Hill, Michigan State University Marina von Keyserlingk, University of British Columbia James Murray, University of California Davis Peter Krawczel, University of Tennessee Chapter 2: Agricultural Animal Health Care Chapter 8: Horses Frank F. Bartol, Auburn University, Chair Sarah A. Reed, University of Connecticut Johann Coetzee, Kansas State University Donald C. Lay Jr., ARS USDA Cia Johnson, American Veterinary Medical Association Timothy B. Lescun, Purdue University Wendy Underwood, American Veterinary Medical Association Chapter 9: Swine Michael Martin, North Carolina Department of Agriculture Gretchen Hill, Michigan State University and Consumer Services Donald C. Lay Jr., ARS USDA Scott Radcliffe, Purdue University Chapter 3: Husbandry, Housing, and Biosecurity Brian Richert, Purdue University Darrin Karcher, Purdue University, Chair Marcia Endres, University of Minnesota Chapter 10: Sheep and Goats Rick Grant, William H. Miner Agricultural Research Michael L. Thonney, Cornell University Institute Daniel F. Waldron, Texas A&M University (retired) Frank Mitloehner, University of California Davis Gosia Zobel, AgResearch, New Zealand Mark Estienne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Michael D. MacNeil, Delta G & State University Ken Koelkebeck, University of Illinois Poultry Science Association Editorial Committee (poultry species chapters) Chapter 4: Environmental Enrichment A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia Janeen Salak-Johnson, Oklahoma State University, Chair Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University Donald C. Lay Jr., ARS USDA Karen Christensen, Tyson Foods Kathryn Proudfoot, The Ohio State University Ken Koelkebeck, University of Illinois Emily Miller-Cushon, University of Florida Maja Makagon, University of California Davis Chapter 11: Meat-Type Poultry Marisa Erasmus, Purdue University Colin Scanes, University of Arkansas, Chair Kate Barger-Weathers, Cobb-Vantress Inc. Chapter 5: Animal Handling and Transport Dave Hermes, Purdue University Temple Grandin, Colorado State University, Chair Bill Dozier, Auburn University Casey W. Ritz, University of Georgia Karen Christensen, Tyson Foods Inc. Derek Haley, University of Guelph Anne-Marie Neeteson, Aviagen Inc. Yi Liang, University of Arkansas Aaron Kiess, Mississippi State University Chapter 6: Beef Cattle Joel S. Caton, North Dakota State University Michael Galyean, Texas Tech University Ron Lemenager, Purdue University Greg Lardy, North Dakota State University Michael Looper, University of Arkansas Clinton Krehbiel, University of Nebraska Continued Steven Zinn, University of Connecticut Chapter 12: Egg-Type Poultry Chapter 13: Waterfowl Ken Koelkebeck, University of Illinois, Chair Greg Fraley, Purdue University, Chair Ken Anderson, North Carolina State University Mike Lilburn, The Ohio State University Karen Schwean-Lardner, University of Saskatchewan Mamduh Sifri, Sifri Solutions LLC Craig Coufal, Texas A&M University Xixi Chen, Maple Leaf Farms Inc. Janice Siegford, Michigan State University Darrin Karcher, Purdue University A. Bruce Webster, University of Georgia Maja Makagon, University of California Davis Heng-wei Cheng, ARS USDA/Purdue University Pat Wakenell, Purdue University Susan Fraley, Purdue University Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 3rd edition (2010) Writing Committee John McGlone, PhD, Co-Chair Janice Swanson, PhD, Co-Chair Steven Ford, PhD Wendy Underwood, DVM Frank Mitloehner, PhD Joy Mench, PhD Temple Grandin, PhD Terry Mader, PhD Pamela Ruegg, DVM Susan Eicher, PhD Carolyn Stull, PhD Patricia Hester, PhD Gregory Lewis, PhD Janeen Salak-Johnson, PhD Michael Galyean, PhD, Liaison to the FASS Board Subcommittees Institutional Policies Dairy Cattle Stephen Ford, PhD, Chair Pamela Ruegg, DVM, and Susan Eicher, PhD, Co-Chairs James Swearengen, DVM Bill Bickert, PhD Don Lay, PhD Randy Shaver, PhD W. Ronald Butler, PhD Nigel Cook, BS, MRCVS Frank Bartol, PhD Paul Fricke, PhD Sheila McGuirk, PhD, DVM Agricultural Animal Health Care Doug Reinemann, PhD Wendy Underwood, DVM, Chair Michele Bailey, DVM Horses Steven Berry, DVM Carolyn Stull, PhD, Chair Gail Golab, PhD, DVM Anne Rodiek, PhD Robert Coleman, PhD Husbandry, Housing, and Biosecurity Sarah Ralston, VMD, PhD Frank Mitloehner, PhD, Chair Donald Topliff, PhD James Swearengen, DVM Suzanne Millman, PhD Curt Gooch, PE Pius Mwangi Ndewga, PhD Poultry Larry Jacobson, PhD Patricia Hester, PhD, Chair Ken Anderson, PhD Environmental Enrichment Inma Estevez, PhD Joy Mench, PhD, Chair Ken Koelkebeck, PhD Ruth Newberry, PhD Sally Noll, PhD Suzanne Millman, PhD Robert Porter, PhD, DVM Cassandra Tucker, PhD Carl Mike Turk, BS Larry Katz, PhD Bruce Webster, PhD Animal Handling and Transport Sheep and Goats Temple Grandin, PhD, Chair Gregory Lewis, PhD, Chair Joseph Stookey, PhD William Gavin, DVM Mhairi Sutherland, PhD Arthur L. Goetsch, PhD A. Bruce Webster, PhD J. Bret Taylor, PhD Carolyn Stull, PhD Michael Thonney, PhD Jeffrey Hill, PhD Swine Beef Cattle Janeen Salak-Johnson, PhD, Chair Terry Mader, PhD, Chair Joe Cassady, PhD Allen Trenkle, PhD Matthew B. Wheeler, PhD James W. Oltjen, PhD Anna Johnson, PhD Tami Brown-Brandl, PhD John Arthington, PhD Larry Hollis, DVM Scott Willard, PhD Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, 1st revised edition (1999) Stanley Curtis, FASFAS liaison to the steering and development committee Guide Revision Committee Joy A. Mench, Chair Margaret E. Benson James V. Craig Katherine A. Houpt John J. McGlone Jack L. Albright Leslie L. Christianson Adele P. Douglass William G. Kvasnicka Neal R. Merchen Subcommittees Beef Horses Sheep and Goats Neal R. Merchen, Chair Katherine A. Houpt, Chair Margaret E. Benson, Chair G. LeRoy Hahn Harold F. Hintz Frank C. Hinds William G. Kvasnicka Sandi Lieb Carl S. Menzies Michael L. Galyean James A. DeShazer Cindy B. Wolf David P. Hutcheson K. Douglas Butler Dexter W. Johnson Janice C. Swanson Stephen G. Jackson Larry S. Katz Thomas Tobin Christine S. F. Williams Dairy Cattle and Veal Jack L. Albright, Chair Poultry Swine Ruth Blauwiekel James V. Craig, Chair John J. McGlone, Chair Kenneth E. Olson Gerald B. Haventsein J. Joe Ford William G. Bickert Karl E. Nestor Paul L. Sundberg James L. Morrill Jr. Paul B. Siegel Leslie L. Christianson Carolyn L. Stull William F. Dean E. T. Kornegay Kenneth K. Kruger Lisa Tokach Graham H. Purchase Garrett L. Van Wicklen Committees for the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, 1st edition (1988) Steering Committee Joy A. Mench, Chair Alden Booren Glenn Gray Kirklyn Kerr David L. Zartman Jack L. Albright Leslie L. Christianson Virgil Hays Alvin Melliere Guide Development Committee Stanley E. Curtis, Chair Jack L. Albright Harold W. Gonyou John J. McGlone James V. Craig Katherine A. Houpt W. Ray Stricklin Table of Contents PREFACE x CHAPTER 1: INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES 1 CHAPTER 2: AGRICULTURAL ANIMAL HEALTH CARE 9 CHAPTER 3: HUSBANDRY, HOUSING, AND BIOSECURITY 17 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT 30 CHAPTER 5: ANIMAL HANDLING AND TRANSPORT 54 CHAPTER 6: BEEF CATTLE 76 CHAPTER 7: DAIRY CATTLE 92 CHAPTER 8: HORSES 113 CHAPTER 9: SWINE 127 CHAPTER 10: DOMESTIC SHEEP AND GOATS 141 CHAPTER 11: MEAT-TYPE POULTRY 156 CHAPTER 12: EGG-TYPE POULTRY 177 CHAPTER 13: WATERFOWL 199 APPENDIX I U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training 208 INDEX 209 viii ix PREFACE This is the fourth edition of the Guide for the Care the Ag Guide. All chapters were updated, revised, and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and or rewritten, with the extent of revision of any given Teaching, commonly known as the Ag Guide. This chapter determined by progress in the academic lit- edition builds upon and replaces previous versions erature pertaining to subjects covered in the chapter. of the Ag Guide published in 1988, 1999, and 2010. Three new poultry chapters were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals: Responsibilities, Recognition, and Intervention
    Guidelines for Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals: Responsibilities, Recognition, and Intervention Introduction Animals can experience pain and distress. It is the ethical and legal obligation of all personnel involved with the use of animals in research to reduce or eliminate pain and distress in research animals whenever such actions do not interfere with the research objectives. The Institute/Center Animal Care and Use Committee (IC ACUC) has the delegated responsibility and accountability for ensuring that all animals under their oversight are used humanely and in accordance with a number of Federal Regulations and policies.2,21,29,30,32 Key to fulfilling the responsibilities for both the Principal Investigator (PI) and the IC ACUC are to: • understand the legal requirements, • be able to distinguish pain and distress in animals from their normal state, • relieve or minimize the pain and distress appropriately; and • establish humane endpoints. Regulatory Requirements and IC ACUC Responsibilities The IC ACUC must ensure that all aspects of the animal study proposal (ASP) that may cause more than transient pain and/or distress are addressed; alternatives6 to painful or distressful procedures are considered; that methods, anesthetics, and analgesics to minimize or eliminate pain and distress are included when these methods do not interfere with the research objectives; and that humane endpoints have been established for all situations where more than transient pain and distress can not be avoided or eliminated. Whenever possible, death or severe pain and distress should be avoided as endpoints. A written scientific justification is required to be included in the ASP for any more than transient painful or distressful procedure that cannot be relieved or minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Here
    GETTING HERE Just a short ride away from the city centre is Sydney Road Brunswick, well-loved culinary & entertainment haven of Melbournians. Follow your nose & be spoilt for choice with restaurants, cafés, bakeries, takeaway food, pubs, music venues, function spaces, shisha lounges, bars, hotels & bottle shops. You can get to Sydney Road Brunswick via a range of public transport, by bike, car or walking. Train: Upfield line: Jewell, Brunswick, Anstey & Moreland stations. Tram: Route 19 Elizabeth St. City to North Coburg. Car: 400 Car spaces along Sydney Rd & Approx 900 off street. Bus: #503 via Albion St, #504 via Hope St, #506 via Dawson St/Glenlyon Rd, #508 via Victoria St, #509 via Moreland Rd, #510 via Moreland Rd. (03) 9380 2005 L1/233 Sydney Road DOWNLOADDOWNLOAD SYDNEYSYDNEY RDRD APP Brunswick AvailableAvailable on on App App Store Store && GoogleGoogle Play [email protected] sydneyroad.com.ausydneyroad.com.au @sydneyroadbrunswick @sydneyroadbrunswick COME FOR THE DAY Known as the ‘longest shopping strip in the Southern Hemisphere’, Our cafés & restaurants range you’re spoilt for choice. If you’re from traditional Aussie patisseries, after authentic experiences in to local stomping grounds of dining & bars, it’s certainly the ethnic flavours, to organic, place to hang-out. Sydney Road gluten-free & high tea salons. Brunswick is an eclectic mecca We’ve got entertainment for of ethnic & artisan places, both everyone – dance clubs, live music, traditional & up-and-coming. trivia nights, boutique bars, beer Reward your palate with something gardens, bottle shops, galleries, exotic or chillax all your senses gaming facilities, corporate & in a shisha lounge.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Index
    To download a printer friendly version of this index, go to www.entertainmentbook.com.au Master Index 52 Espresso B20 B Bake Boss G57 7D Cinema E95 Bakers Delight D31, 32, 33 A Balloon Aloft Gold Coast E87 AAT Kings H19, 20 Baskin-Robbins D25, 26, 27 Abrakidazzle E51 Baystar Express G34 ACE H61, 62 BCF F19, 20 Adairs F11, 12 Be Somewhere B37 Adina & Medina Apartment Hotels J29, 30 Beach Shack B6 Air Factory Trampoline Park E31 Beachside Pavilion A40 Air New Zealand H7, 8 Beijing Palace A92 Ala Moana by Mantra J77, 78 Bine Bar & Dining A57 Albert River Wines A82 Bistro On3 A63 Albert River Wines G58 Black Angus A11 All India Taste C59 Blue Owl Cafe and Restaurant C37 Alleys Restaurant at Currumbin RSL A74 Bombay Affair C5 AMF Bowling Centres E16, 17, 1 Boom Boom Burgers B32 Boost Juice D13, 14, 15 Apollo Motorhome Holidays H65, 66 Boulders & Badlands Mini Golf E58 Aqua Body & Soul G39 Bounce Inc E89, 90 Arajilla J15, 16 Boutique Collection J75, 76 Art Series Hotel Group J39, 40 BreakFree Hotels, Resorts & Apartments J35, 36 Arts Cinemas E70 British Airways H3, 4 Arundel Hills Country Club B39, E35 Britz H67, 68 Astral Tower J11, 12 Brumby’s Bakery D10, 11, 12 Aussie China Kitchen A84 Budget Australia H53-56 Australia Zoo H29, 30 Buffalo Sears Smokehouse Restaurant & Bar A48 Australian Outback Spectacular H27, 28 Burleigh Heads Rugby League Football Club B16 Avenue A41 Burleigh Social B11 Avis Australia H49-52 Burleigh Sports Club B40 Avvia A69 Burrito Bar C4 Aztec C9 BWS F29, 30 Visit www.entertainmentbook.com.au for additional offers, suburb search, important updates and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Do “Prey Species” Hide Their Pain? Implications for Ethical Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
    Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research 2 (2020) 216–236 brill.com/jaae Do “Prey Species” Hide Their Pain? Implications for Ethical Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Larry Carbone Independent scholar; 351 Buena Vista Ave #703E, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA [email protected] Abstract Accurate pain evaluation is essential for ethical review of laboratory animal use. Warnings that “prey species hide their pain,” encourage careful accurate pain assess- ment. In this article, I review relevant literature on prey species’ pain manifestation through the lens of the applied ethics of animal welfare oversight. If dogs are the spe- cies whose pain is most reliably diagnosed, I argue that it is not their diet as predator or prey but rather because dogs and humans can develop trusting relationships and because people invest time and effort in canine pain diagnosis. Pain diagnosis for all animals may improve when humans foster a trusting relationship with animals and invest time into multimodal pain evaluations. Where this is not practical, as with large cohorts of laboratory mice, committees must regard with skepticism assurances that animals “appear” pain-free on experiments, requiring thorough literature searches and sophisticated pain assessments during pilot work. Keywords laboratory animal ‒ pain ‒ animal welfare ‒ ethics ‒ animal behavior 1 Introduction As a veterinarian with an interest in laboratory animal pain management, I have read articles and reviewed manuscripts on how to diagnose a mouse in pain. The challenge, some authors warn, is that mice and other “prey species” © LARRY CARBONE, 2020 | doi:10.1163/25889567-bja10001 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Advances in the Study of Animal Welfare
    Scientific advances in the study of animal welfare How we can more effectively Why Pain? assess pain… Matt Leach To recognise it, you need to define it… ‘Pain is an unpleasant sensory & emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage’ IASP 1979 As it is the emotional component that is critical for our welfare, the same will be true for animals Therefore we need indices that reflect this component! Q. How do we assess experience? • As it is subjective, direct assessment is difficult.. • Unlike in humans we do not have a gold standard – i.e. Self-report – Animals cannot meaningfully communicate with us… • So we traditionally use proxy indices Derived from inferential reasoning Infer presence of pain in animals from behavioural, anatomical, physiological & biochemical similarity to humans In humans, if pain induces a change & that change is prevented by pain relief, then it is used to assess pain If the same occurs in animals, then we assume that they can be used to assess pain Quantitative sensory testing • Application of standardised noxious stimuli to induce a reflex response – Mechanical, thermal or electrical… – Used to measure nociceptive (i.e. sensory) thresholds • Wide range of methods used – Choice depends on type of pain (acute / chronic) modeled • Elicits specific behavioural response (e.g. withdrawal) – Latency & frequency of response routinely measured – Intensity of stimulus required to elicit a response • Easy to use, but difficult to master… Value? • What do these tests tell us: – Fundamental nociceptive mechanisms & central processing – It measures evoked pain, not spontaneous pain • Tests of hypersensitivity not pain per se (Different mechanisms) • What don’t these tests tell us: – Much about the emotional component of pain • Measures nociceptive (sensory) thresholds based on autonomic responses (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Index
    To download a printer friendly version of this index, go to www.entertainmentbook.com.au Master Index 365 Roadside Assistance G84 Avis Australia H49-52 529 The Terrace A31 Avoca Beach Picture Theatre E46 Awaba House Café B61 A Awezone Trampoline Park E66 AAT Kings H19, 20 Absolute Thai C9 B ACE H61, 62 Babbingtons Bar and Grill A29 Activate Foods G29 Bakers Delight D7, 8, 9 Adairs F11, 12 The Balcony Restaurant & Bar A28 Adina & Medina Apartment Hotels J29, 30 Balloon Boutique G63 Adnama Beauty Salon G50 Balloon Worx G64 Air New Zealand H7, 8 Bar Depot A20 Ala Moana by Mantra J77, 78 Bar Petite A67 Albion Hotel B66 Baskin-Robbins D36 The Albion Hotel B60 Battlezone Playlive E91 Alice’s Wonderland Fancy Dress Hire G65 Baume A77 Al-Oi Thai Restaurant A66 Bay of India C37 Alpine Sports G69 The Bayview B56 Amandas on the Edge A9 BCF F19, 20 Amazement E69 Beach Hotel B13 The Anchor B68 The Beehive Honeysuckle B96 And the Winner Is OSCARS B53 Bella Beans B97 Apollo Motorhome Holidays H65, 66 The Belmore Hotel B52 Aqua Golf E24 The Bikesmith & Espresso Bar D61 Aqua re Bar & Grill B67 Bimbadgen G18 Arabian Lounge C25 Birdy’s Refreshments and Espresso B125 Arajilla J15, 16 Black Circle Cafe B95 The Argenton Hotel B27 Black Pepper Butchery G5 The Ark Cafe B69 Aromas on Sea B16 Blackbird Artisan Bakery B104 Art Series Hotel Group J39, 40 The Blackbutt Hotel B76 Astral Tower J11, 12 Blaxland Inn A65 The Australia Hotel B24 Bliss Coffee Roasters D66 Australia Walkabout Wildlife Park E87, 88 Blue and White Car Wash G82 Australia Zoo H29, 30 Bluebird Florist G76 Australian Boating College E65 Bocados Spanish Kitchen A50 Australian Outback Spectacular H27, 28 Bolton Street Pantry B47 Australian Reptile Park E3 Bondi Pizza - Bar & Grill A85 Visit www.entertainmentbook.com.au for additional offers, suburb search, important updates and more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences: a Downloaded from Reply to Ken Anderson†
    The European Journal of International Law Vol. 20 no. 4 © EJIL 2010; all rights reserved .......................................................................................... The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences: A Downloaded from Reply to Ken Anderson† Amrita Kapur* http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org Professor Ken Anderson’s essay is ity as the foundational IHL principle in ‘an un abashed survey, in a short his argument in favour of reciprocity, space’ (at 332), which ‘surfs rather the right to judge conditional on inter­ than dives’ (at 358), in order to allow vention, and his claim of a trend away the reader to appreciate ‘just how from intervention. This article does not breathtakingly broad the horizon of comprehensively address the process or our rising system of international driving forces behind the humanization at MPI F Medizinische Forschung on April 23, 2010 criminal law turns out to be’ (at 358). of international law, which have pro­ The concomitant risk of this approach moted a trend towards intervention away is to mischaracterize the analysed phe­ from the historical post­Westphalian pre­ no­­mena by neglecting issues which sumption of non­interference. fundamentally affect them. Highlight­ Briefly, it bears noting that Anderson’s ing counter­arguments and consider­ depiction of passive neutrality presumes ing contradictory evidence, however that the ICC’s existence reduces the pres­ briefly, would have been one way to sure to intervene that would otherwise canvas, albeit not capture, the complex­ exist (at 334), when in fact international ity of the issues and avoid excluding politics is evolving from a position of a critical aspects of international legal complete lack of expectation, let alone developments.
    [Show full text]
  • PAIN SCORING in DOGS: an OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT PAIN SCORING in CATS: an OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT (Combined)
    PAIN SCORING IN DOGS: AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT PAIN SCORING IN CATS: AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT (Combined) Kirk Munoz, DVM (Hons), PgCert BA, MRCVS, cVMA, DACVAA Board Certified Specialist in Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia Assistant Professor, Anesthesia Fear Free Certified Professional College of Veterinary Medicine- Michigan State University 784 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] Maggie (Pratt) Bodiya BS, LVT, VTS- AVTAA Veterinary Technician Specialist (Anesthesia/Analgesia) Veterinary Nurse III (Anesthesia Dept.) Academic Instructor (MSU Veterinary Nursing Program) Fear Free Certified Professional College of Veterinary Medicine- Michigan State University 784 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] Pain is a multifactorial experience involving both sensory and emotional components. There have been many definitions of pain but the most recent and accepted one has been stated by The International Association for the Study of Pain which states that, “Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.” Cats tend to display many of the signs associated with pain in dogs, but they may vary from dogs in the sense that they can also appear very grumpy and remain in a quiet crouched position. In some cases, cats will purr when they are happy and also in pain, so this cannot be relied on to determine if a cat is painful or not. This goes to prove the point that no one sign can be used to determine if an animal is painful and the extent of the pain that animal is experiencing. Animals that are painful may become very reserved and quiet, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Our Fundraising by Purchasing the Entertainment™ Membership That Suits You!
    Support our fundraising by purchasing the Entertainment™ Membership that suits you! Discover thousands of valuable up to 50% off and 2-for-1 offers for many of the best restaurants, arts, attractions, hotels, travel, shopping and much, much more! Imagine over 75 2-for-1 or 25% off offers for the finest restaurants like... • Comme • Steer Bar and Grill • Sarti • The Grand Hotel Richmond • Church Street Enoteca • Bluestone • Bistro Guillaume • Albert St Food and Wine • Paladarr • Union Dining • The Botanical • Lamaro’s • No.8 by John Lawson • Koots Salle À Manger and many more… Discover over 470 2-for-1 or 25% off offers for the trendiest cafés and casual restaurants like... • Friends of Mine • Richmond Hill Cafe and • Red Cup Cafe • The Groove Train Larder • Wagamama • Snow Pony • PappaRich • Hofbrauhaus Melbourne • He Says She Says • Caffe Sienna Ristorante • The Merrywell – Upstairs • Half Moon • Little Chloe • Basilico and many more… Enjoy over 90 2-for-1 and up to 50% off offers for the most popular takeaway chains like... • McCafé • Mad Mex • Cold Rock • Trampoline • The Cheesecake Shop • Schnitz • Glick’s Cakes and Bagels • Chatime • Red Rooster • Wendys • Lord of the Fries • Urban Burger • KFC • Mrs Fields Cookies and many more… Over 120 2-for-1 and up to 50% off Ongoing offers all year long Up to 50% off Travel, Leisure for leading Arts, Sports and Attractions for National Retailers and Accommodation • Luna Park • SEALIFE Melbourne Aquarium • Village Cinemas • AFL • Collingwood Children’s Farm • Melbourne Star Observation Wheel and many more… To support our fundraising by purchasing your Entertainment™ Membership, see reverse a A6 Melbourne 2014-2015 City Flyer is a registered trademark licensed from Entertainment Publications, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Operations 2016
    Advertising Standards Bureau – Bureau Advertising Standards www.adstandards.com.au Review of Operations 2016 Level 2, 97 Northbourne Avenue, Turner ACT 2612 Review of Operations 2016 Ph: (02) 6173 1500 | Fax: (02) 6262 9833 Follow us on Twitter: @Ad_Standards Copyright © 2016 Advertising Standards Bureau All rights reserved. Printed in Australia. Published by the Advertising Standards Bureau, Level 2, 97 Northbourne Avenue, Turner ACT 2612. Contents Who we are 2016 2 Executive reports 8 Achievements 15 Board reports 23 Independent review 61 Statistics 65 Who we are 2016 The Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB) administers Australia’s national system of self-regulation in relation to both public and competitor complaints. This is achieved through the independent • explaining the role of advertising in a free advertisements in order to provide a seamless complaints resolution processes of the Advertising enterprise system complaint lodgement system for consumers. Standards Board and the Advertising Claims • running other regulatory systems as Board respectively. Public complaints about particular advertisements contracted from time to time. in relation to the issues below are considered The ASB has an ongoing commitment to In 2016 the ASB administered the following cost-free to the community by the Advertising international best practice in advertising codes of practice: Standards Board: self-regulation and measures its performance in administering Australia’s advertising • Australian Association of National • health and safety self-regulation
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019
    ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE UPDATE ISSUE 66 – OCTOBER 2019 The aim of the animal welfare science update is to keep you informed of developments in animal welfare science relating to the work of the RSPCA. The update provides summaries of the most relevant scientific papers and reports received by the RSPCA Australia office in the past quarter. Email [email protected] to subscribe. ANIMALS USED FOR SPORT, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATION AND WORK Observations on human safety and horse emotional state during grooming sessions Grooming is a basic aspect of horse care, and when During grooming, only 5% of the horses expressed performed correctly can be a pleasant experience for mutual grooming, approach or relaxed behaviour, the horse. However, when performed incorrectly it whereas avoidance and threatening behaviour were can lead to negative emotions in horses and these expressed by four times more horses. This behaviour may lead to handling difficulties and potential safety was independent of the horse’s gender or breed, issues. In fact, one quarter of injuries caused by horses suggesting that these behaviours are less related to the that require hospital treatment occur while the rider characteristics of the horses, and more related to the is on foot, and children are substantially more likely way they are groomed. During the observations there to be seriously injured when they are on foot near a were 9 potentially dangerous incidents where a horse’s horse compared to when they are riding. This study teeth or hoof passed within 10cm of the rider’s body, examined the behaviours of both horse and rider and the riders were often unaware of this behaviour in during a grooming session to determine whether their horse.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs Ison, SH; Clutton, RE; Di Giminiani, P; Rutherford, KMD
    Scotland's Rural College A review of pain assessment in pigs Ison, SH; Clutton, RE; Di Giminiani, P; Rutherford, KMD Published in: Frontiers in Veterinary Science DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 First published: 28/11/2016 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Ison, SH., Clutton, RE., Di Giminiani, P., & Rutherford, KMD. (2016). A review of pain assessment in pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 3, 8 - 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 REVIEW published: 28 November 2016 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108 A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs Sarah H. Ison1,2*†, R. Eddie Clutton2, Pierpaolo Di Giminiani3 and Kenneth M. D. Rutherford1 1 Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK, 2 Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK, 3 Food and Rural Development, School of Agriculture, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK There is a moral obligation to minimize pain in pigs used for human benefit.
    [Show full text]