Joshua Kay Best Dissertation Prize Winner MSc Comparative Politics 2018-9
[email protected] ‘A war against our values?’ - an actor-centred comparison of anti- immigration framing in the UK, Netherlands and France. A dissertation submitted to the Department of Government, the London School of Economics and Political Science, in part completion of the requirements for the MSc in Comparative Politics. August 2019. Word count: 10068. 1 Abstract Although European radical right parties share the view that immigration to their respective nations should be reduced, the justifications or framings for such a position are widely varied. Applying critical discourse analysis to speeches and interviews from Nigel Farage, former leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party in the UK (UKIP), Geert Wilders, leader of the Party for Freedom in the Netherlands (PVV) and Marine Le Pen, leader of the National Rally in France (RN), this research emphasises the unique combination of nativist, economic, security and liberal framings employed by each party. UKIP underlines the economic problems caused by immigration. The PVV, combining a nativist and liberal frame, highlights the incompatibility of Muslim immigrants with liberal-democratic Western society. The RN, somewhere in the middle, deploys more moderately economic and liberal frames. The parties converge on how immigration destabilises national security. Thus, this project finds a more nuanced relationship between the radical right and liberal values than traditionally theorised. Further, this research provides the opportunity for future work to connect ideological framing of radical right parties to electoral success. Empirically, this project demonstrates two concrete benefits to attending to the agency of radical right parties: first, it enables researchers to establish important differences and similarities between such parties; second, it facilitates the mapping of their shifts in framing over time.