DOCSLIB.ORG

What Do I Do Next?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Do I Do Next? CONTRIBUTORS Dr. Karen Stollznow Linguist; author; Editor, The Skeptic magazine Daniel Loxton Robynn “Swoopy” McCarthy Editor, Junior Skeptic magazine; Co-Host, Skepticality — The Official staff writer, Skeptic magazine Podcast of Skeptic Magazine; Co-Director, Skeptrack (at Dragon*Con) Benjamin Radford Kylie Sturgess Managing Editor, Skeptical Correspondent, Skeptic Zone Inquirer and Pensar magazines; podcast; Creator, Podblack Blog paranormal investigator CONTRIBUTORS Dr. Eugenie C. Scott Tim Farley Physical Anthropologist; Creator, What’s The Harm Executive Director, National website, Skeptical Software Center for Science Education Tools blog Jeff Wagg Dr. Randy Olson Communication and Outreach Marine Biologist; Filmmaker, Manager, James Randi Flock of Dodos: the Evolution – Educational Foundation Intelligent Design Circus D.J. Grothe Pat Linse Host of Point of Inquiry; Co-Founder, Skeptics Society; Associate Editor of Free Inquiry Co-publisher and Art Director, magazine; Vice President and Skeptic magazine; Creator of Director of Outreach Programs, Junior Skeptic Center for Inquiry Brian Dunning Jay Novella Host & producer, Skeptoid Co-Host, The Skeptics’ Guide podcast to the Universe podcast 2 THE PROJECT In 2007, I called for a renewed focus on classical skeptical activism in an article called “Where Do We Go From Here?” (released as an audio essay on Skeptic magazine’s official podcast Skepticality,1 in PDF form at Skeptic.com,2 and in print by the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry’s Skeptical Briefs newsletter.) Letters of response flooded in — and a common theme emerged. Many people wrote to say, “Alright, I’m convinced. I’m ready to become a skeptical activist. Now what?” That was a very big question. Attempting to craft a substantial answer, I re-read a concise 2004 Skeptic magazine article entitled “50 Things You Can Do To Encourage Critical Thinking.” This point-form list of practical suggestions (by magician Andrew Mayne) captured my feelings exactly: concrete, positive action is the point of skepticism as a movement. At the end of the day, we’re in this thing to discover reality, to expose fraud — and to help people. That seemed like a great foundation to build on. With Mayne’s permission, I developed an expanded new list of over 100 suggestions for skeptical activism. Then, I invited prominent skeptical writers, organizers, and activists to comment on each of these suggestions. INTRODUCTION The response was exhilarating. Many leading skeptics gave generously of their time and experience, enthusiastically sharing wisdom and advice. I collated that flood of comments into a master document, in the format of a panel discussion — and then sent that out for further commentary. Over months, the project went through several rounds of comment and counter-comment — followed by many more rounds of editing, restructuring, and proofing. The result is a sprawling and rich document, to which 13 skeptics contributed almost 30,000 words. Their comments comprise a fair cross-section of skeptical thought: contributors came from all of the national U.S. skeptics groups and also five of the leading skeptical podcasts — plus the world’s leading creationist watchdog, an important filmmaker, an influential independent web innovator, and the head of one of the most effective national skeptics groups overseas. I’d like to thank all those who joined me on the project. Even more, I extend my gratitude to all those readers and emerging leaders who choose to discuss and develop these ideas from this point forward.3 I hope you find this topic as inspiring to consider as I have. Daniel Loxton Skeptic magazine Editor, Junior Skeptic 1 http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticality/063_skepticality.mp3 3 Share your feedback and ideas about skeptical activism at 3 2 http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/WhereDoWeGoFromHere.pdf www.skepticforum.com/activism HOW TO READ THIS DOCUMENT At over 30,000 words, this document is less a large article than a small book — a book with 105 subsections. This may sound a little unwieldy, but not to worry: the many subsections can be read selectively, or out of order. Each subsection comprises a panel discussion about one particular idea or strategy, some brief and some extensive. Each can be read in isolation. Or, for those who prefer a convenient way to survey the entire list, a point-form “Quick Reference Guide” version is included as an Appendix (starting on page 56). This Quick Reference Guide includes bullet points drawn from the larger panel discussion. It may also be read and linked to in html format at www.skeptic.com/article/WhatDoIDoNext To make it easier to find the topics of greatest interest, both the full discussion and the Quick Reference Guide version are organized under the following umbrella headings: • SUPPORT MAJOR SKEPTICAL ORGANIZATIONS (page 5) INTRODUCTION • LEARN & COMMUNICATE (page 12) • INVESTIGATE (page 21) • LOCAL ORGANIZING & FUN (page 23) • YOUR COMMUNITY (page 27) • INTERACT WITH MEDIA (page 30) • SCHOOLS (page 33) • LIBRARIES (page 36) • POLITICAL ACTION (page 37) • CONSUMER ACTIVISM (page 40) • FILM & VIDEO (page 42) • ONLINE ACTIVISM (page 44) • PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS (page 52) plus, the distilled, point-form • QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE (page 56) Finally, be aware that this is not an exhaustive list, but merely a place to begin. No such list can ever be complete, so long as motivated skeptical activists continue to innovate and bring their best ideas forward. To share your ideas about skeptical activism, visit www.skepticforum.com/activism 4 Ben: Supporting skeptical organizations is SUPPORT MAJOR critical, because they serve as public SKEPTICAL ORGANIZATIONS voices for reason. It’s all well and good for individual people to be skeptical of things, but organizations can do outreach much more effectively than solo skeptics. 1. Donate money to skeptical organizations. Without organizations to support higher- profile skeptics, we wouldn’t reach nearly as many people. Daniel: I’m wryly aware of my conflict of interest on this point — I work for a Daniel: Here’s an important suggestion that skeptical organization. But I’m also well sounded slightly ghoulish to me when I placed to appreciate that skeptical first encountered skepticism in my teens, organizations are typically shoestring but which now already (in my 30s) operations with their eyes on many worthy seems to me moving and noble: consider projects they simply can’t afford. Most providing for a skeptical organization in are understaffed, often with staffers who your will. subsidize the organization by doing a lot This is a standard thing for nonprofits. of pro bono work. Out-of-date tools limit In some circumstances, this can even many groups. With severe budget result in a larger inheritance for your limitations, many create outreach materials loved ones — and your bequest really with frankly sub-professional production can make a lasting, critical impact for values — which makes it difficult for skepticism. This was certainly the case even the Big Three U.S. skeptics for the Australian Skeptics. SUPPORT SKEPTICAL ORGANIZATIONS organizations to truly compete in the marketplace of ideas. Karen: Yes. A decade ago the Australian Skeptics received a generous bequest Make no mistake: the bizarrely successful that allowed us to employ a CEO and market penetration of paranormal ideas editor, to maintain and improve our like Intelligent Design or alternative magazine (one of the world’s top three!), medicine is built on money. Lots and to support research, and to fund lots of money. scholarships and awards. This support The Skeptics Society, James Randi was fundamental to the continuation Educational Foundation (JREF), and and growth of our organization. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Kylie: You could include a bequest in your (CSI, formerly will — or you could also consider a donation now for one special thing that Want to called the survey the full Committee for the will always be associated with you or list of suggestions Scientific someone you love. before digging into the Investigation of Karen: I’d also suggest that people consider Claims of the detailed discussion? supporting overseas organizations, partic- Paranormal, or Check out the point-form ularly those in less affluent countries CSICOP) are all Quick Reference beset by the paranormal and pseudo- version, registered nonprofits science. This support need not always be included as an Appendix who are able to financial, but could extend to promotion, starting on page 56. accept tax-deductible donations of DVDs and magazines, and donations.2,3,4 All more. For example, The Australian function in part on A Quick Reference Skeptics is proud to be associated with donations made at version of these 105 Leo Igwe of the Nigerian Skeptics. Leo is the pocket change a frequent contributor to The Skeptic (he suggestions for skeptical scale. All are willing has also written for Skeptical Inquirer). activism is also available to explore conditions His articles discuss the severity of and special in html format at supernatural beliefs and practices arrangements for Skeptic.com1 throughout Africa, such as witchcraft, larger contributions. voodoo, and dangerous scams. 1 http://www.skeptic.com/article/WhatDoIDoNext 3 http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/support-us.html 5 2 http://www.skeptic.com/about_us/donate.html 4 http://www.csicop.org/about/donate.html Ben: Karen’s point about outreach in “Third Swoopy: While I agree it is important to World” countries is very good. While we donate to these organizations, many of in North America, Europe, and Australia whom subsist purely on the generosity naturally focus on combating the of their base, I would also recommend paranormal and pseudoscience at home, to those who run those organizations not many countries, particularly in Latin to ask for funds too often — and to temper America and Africa, are also in great the way in which they express the need need of skeptical resources. I’m pleased for financial support.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chupacabra Mystery
    SI May June 11 CUT_SI new design masters 3/25/11 11:29 AM Page 45 Slaying the Vampire Solving the Chupacabra Mystery The mysterious vampire beast el chupacabra is said to have terrorized people around the world since at least 1995. A five-year skeptical investigation reveals the surprising origin of this monster, finding that there’s more to this vampire than meets the eye. BENJAMIN RADFORD approximately four-feet tall that had igfoot, the mysterious creature said to roam the thin arms and legs with three fingers or North American wilderness, is named after what it toes at the end of each (Corrales 1997). leaves behind: big footprints. Bigfoot’s Hispanic It had no ears or nose but instead two B small airholes and long spikes down its cousin, el chupacabra, is also known for what it leaves behind: back (see figure 1). When the beast was dead animals mysteriously drained of blood. Goats are said later reported in other countries, it took to be its favorite prey (chupacabra means goat sucker in Span- on a very different form (see figure 2). A few were found dead (for example, in ish), and it is the world’s third best-known mystery creature Nicaragua and Texas), and the carcasses (after Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster). turned out to be small four-legged an- imals from the Canidae family (such as El chupacabra first appeared in 1995 mense confusion and contradiction” dogs and coyotes). after Madelyne Tolentino, an eyewit- surrounding el chupacabra, making it The next step was identifying and ness in Puerto Rico, provided a detailed “almost impossible to distinguish fact analyzing the central claims about el description of the bloodsucker.
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL KURTZ in MEMORIAM Paul Kurtz, Philosopher, Humanist Leader, and Founder of the Modern Skeptical Movement, Dies at Eighty-Six TOM FLYNN
    Jan Feb 13 2_SI new design masters 11/29/12 11:26 AM Page 5 [ PAUL KURTZ IN MEMORIAM Paul Kurtz, Philosopher, Humanist Leader, and Founder of the Modern Skeptical Movement, Dies at Eighty-Six TOM FLYNN Paul Kurtz, founder and longtime chair At NYU Kurtz studied philosophy of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, under Sidney Hook, who had himself the Council for Secular Humanism, and been a protégé of the pragmatist philoso- the Center for Inquiry, died at the age pher John Dewey. The philosophy of of eighty-six on October 20, 2012. He Dewey and Hook, arguably the greatest was one of the most influential figures American thinkers in the humanist tra- in the humanist and skeptical move- dition, would deeply in fluence Kurtz’s ments from the late 1960s through the thought and activism. Kurtz graduated first decade of the twenty-first century. from NYU in 1948 and earned his PhD Among his best-known creations are in philosophy at Columbia University in the skeptics’ magazine SKEPTICAL IN- 1952. QUIRER, the secular humanist magazine Free Inquiry, and the independent pub- Academic Career lisher Prometheus Books. Kurtz taught philosophy at Trinity Col- Jonathan Kurtz, Paul’s son, told SI that lege from 1952 to 1959. He joined the his father had a “‘joyous’ last day, joking, faculty at Union College from 1961 to laughing, etc. He then died suddenly to- 1965; during this period he was also a ward bedtime. There was no suffering.” A visiting lecturer at the New School for joint CFI/CSI/CSH statement marked Social Research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Alpha Consciousness
    The Myth of Alpha Consciousness Alpha brain-waves are marketed as a way to produce relaxation, healing, and meditative or occult states. In fact, they are related to activity in the visual system and have no proven curative or paranormal powers. Barry Beyerstein SYCHOPHYSIOLOGY SEEKS to understand how mechanisms in the nervous system mediate consciousness and behavior. Over Pthe years this hybrid field has seen many newly discovered brain processes reportedly linked with unique psychological states only to have further research reveal that the relationship is far more complex than suspected. Correcting these misinterpretations takes time, even in the pro­ fessional literature. Beyond the lab, it is even more difficult to retire obsolete notions about brain-behavior relationships when the popular press, profit motives, and a host of quasitheological beliefs conspire to perpetuate them. Alpha brain-waves and biofeedback are two areas in which such misapprehensions are legion: In the late 1960s a reawakened interest in altered states of conscious­ ness was buoyed by claims that patterns in the electroencephalogram (EEG) called "alpha waves" were indicators of meditative or psychic states. This, plus the understandable attraction of anything offering quick relief from anxiety and stress, spawned a multimillion-dollar industry aimed at teach­ ing people to maximize EEG alpha through a technique called biofeedback. This occurred despite a growing realization among psychophysiologists that the alleged benefits were based upon unsupported assumptions about alpha and despite growing reservations about the efficacy of biofeedback in general. Barry Beyerstein is in the Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia. 42 THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion
    ABSTRACT Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A., M.A. Mentor: T. Michael Parrish, Ph.D. The trouble with “definitions” is they leave no room for evolution. When a word is concretely defined, it is done so in a particular time and place. Contextual interpretations permit a better understanding of certain heavy words; Atheism as a prime example. In the post-modern world Atheism has become more accepted and popular, especially as a reaction to global terrorism. However, the current definition of Atheism is terribly inaccurate. It cannot be stated properly that pagan Atheism is the same as New Atheism. By interpreting the Atheisms from four stages in the term‟s history a clearer picture of its meaning will come out, hopefully alleviating the stereotypical biases weighed upon it. In the interpretation of the Atheisms from Pagan Antiquity, the Enlightenment, the New Atheist Movement, and the American Judicial and Civil Religious system, a defense of the theory of elastic contextual interpretations, rather than concrete definitions, shall be made. Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion by Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Approved by the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies ___________________________________ Robyn L. Driskell, Ph.D., Interim Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ T.
    [Show full text]
  • Yjyjjgl^Ji^Jihildlitr-1 What's That I Smell? the Claims of Aroma .••
    NOVA EXAMINES ALIEN ABDUCTIONS • THE WEIRD WORLD WEB • DEBUNKING THE MYSTICAL IN INDIA yjyjjgl^ji^JiHildlitr-1 What's That I Smell? The Claims of Aroma .•• Fun and Fallacies with Numbers I by Marilyn vos Savant le Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF THE PARANORMAL AT IHf CENIK FOR INQUKY (ADJACENT IO IME MATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director and Public Relations Director Lee Nisbet. Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock.* psychologist, York Murray Gell-Mann. professor of physics, H. Narasimhaiah, physicist, president, Univ., Toronto Santa Fe Institute; Nobel Prize laureate Bangalore Science Forum, India Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Thomas Gilovich, psychologist, Cornell Dorothy Nelkin. sociologist. New York Univ. Albany, Oregon Univ. Joe Nickell.* senior research fellow, CSICOP Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Henry Gordon, magician, columnist. Lee Nisbet.* philosopher, Medaille College Toronto Kentucky James E. Oberg, science writer Stephen Barrett. M.D., psychiatrist, Stephen Jay Gould, Museum of Loren Pankratz, psychologist, Oregon Comparative Zoology, Harvard Univ. author, consumer advocate, Allentown, Health Sciences Univ. Pa. C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ. of Wales John Paulos, mathematician, Temple Univ. Barry Beyerstein,* biopsychologist, Mark Plummer, lawyer, Australia Simon Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., AI Hibbs, scientist, Jet Propulsion Canada Laboratory W. V. Quine, philosopher. Harvard Univ. Irving Biederman, psychologist, Univ. of Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human Milton Rosenberg, psychologist, Univ. of Chicago Southern California understanding and cognitive science, Carl Sagan, astronomer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bigfoot at 50 Evaluating a Half-Century of Bigfoot Evidence
    B I C F O O T Bigfoot at 50 Evaluating a Half-Century of Bigfoot Evidence The question of Bigfoot's existence comes down to the claim that "Where there's smoke there's fire. " The evidence suggests that there are enough sources of error that there does nc have to be a hidden creature lurking amid the unsubstantiated cases. BENJAMIN RADFORD hough sightings of the North American Bigfoot date back to the 1830s (Bord 1982), interest in Bigfoot Tgrew rapidly during the second half of the twentieth century. This was spurred on by many magazine articles of the time, most seminally a December 1959 True magazine article describing the discovery of large, mysterious foot- prints the year before in Bluff Creek, California. A half century later, the question of Bigfoot's existence remains open. Bigfoot is still sought, the pursuit kept alive by a steady stream of sightings, occasional photos or foot- print finds, and sporadic media coverage. But what evidence has been gathered over the course of fifty years? And what conclusions can we 4mw from that evidence? / SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Manh/Apr**^ 29 Most Bigfoot investigators favor one theory of Bigfoot's ori- gin or existence and stake their reputations on it, sniping at oth- ers who don't share their views. Many times, what one investi- gator sees as clear evidence of Bigfoot another will dismiss out of hand. In July 2000, curious tracks were found on the Lower Hoh Indian Reservation in Washington state. Bigfoot tracker Cliff Crook claimed that die footprints were "for sure a Bigfoot," though Jeffrey Meldrum, an associate professor of bio- logical sciences at Idaho State University (and member of the Bigfoot Field Research Organization, BFRO) decided that there was not enough evidence to pursue the matter (Big Disagreement Afoot 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • *P Ocket Sizes May Vary. W E Recommend Using Really, Really Big Ones
    *Pocket sizes may vary. We recommend using really, really big ones. Table of Contents Welcome to Dragon*Con! .............................................3 Live Performances—Concourse (CONC) .................38 Film Festival Schedule ...............................................56 Vital Information .........................................................4 Online Gaming (MMO) .........................................91 Walk of Fame ...........................................................58 Important Notes ....................................................4 Paranormal Track (PN) .........................................92 Dealers Tables ..........................................................60 Courtesy Buses .....................................................4 Podcasting (POD) ................................................93 Exhibitors Booths ......................................................62 MARTA Schedule ..................................................5 Puppetry (PT) <NEW> .......................................94 Comics Artists Alley ...................................................64 Hours of Operation ................................................5 Reading Sessions (READ) .....................................96 Art Show: Participating Artists ....................................66 Special Events ......................................................6 Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time (RJWOT) ................96 Hyatt Atlanta Fan Tracks Information and Room Locations ...................6 Robotics and Maker Track
    [Show full text]
  • CFI-Annual-Report-2018.Pdf
    Message from the President and CEO Last year was another banner year for the Center the interests of people who embrace reason, for Inquiry. We worked our secular magic in a science, and humanism—the principles of the vast variety of ways: from saving lives of secular Enlightenment. activists around the world who are threatened It is no secret that these powerful ideas like with violence and persecution to taking the no others have advanced humankind by nation’s largest drugstore chain, CVS, to court unlocking human potential, promoting goodness, for marketing homeopathic snake oil as if it’s real and exposing the true nature of reality. If you medicine. are looking for humanity’s true salvation, CFI stands up for reason and science in a way no look no further. other organization in the country does, because This past year we sought to export those ideas to we promote secular and humanist values as well places where they have yet to penetrate. as scientific skepticism and critical thinking. The Translations Project has taken the influential But you likely already know that if you are reading evolutionary biology and atheism books of this report, as it is designed with our supporters in Richard Dawkins and translated them into four mind. We want you not only to be informed about languages dominant in the Muslim world: Arabic, where your investment is going; we want you to Urdu, Indonesian, and Farsi. They are available for take pride in what we have achieved together. free download on a special website. It is just one When I meet people who are not familiar with CFI, of many such projects aimed at educating people they often ask what it is we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Misunderstandings About Evolution a Very Brief Guide for the Curious and the Confused by Dr
    Ten Misunderstandings About Evolution A Very Brief Guide for the Curious and the Confused By Dr. Mike Webster, Dept. of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University ([email protected]); February 2010 The current debate over evolution and “intelligent design” (ID) is being driven by a relatively small group of individuals who object to the theory of evolution for religious reasons. The debate is fueled, though, by misunderstandings on the part of the American public about what evolutionary biology is and what it says. These misunderstandings are exploited by proponents of ID, intentionally or not, and are often echoed in the media. In this booklet I briefly outline and explain 10 of the most common (and serious) misunderstandings. It is impossible to treat each point thoroughly in this limited space; I encourage you to read further on these topics and also by visiting the websites given on the resource sheet. In addition, I am happy to send a somewhat expanded version of this booklet to anybody who is interested – just send me an email to ask for one! What are the misunderstandings? 1. Evolution is progressive improvement of species Evolution, particularly human evolution, is often pictured in textbooks as a string of organisms marching in single file from “simple” organisms (usually a single celled organism or a monkey) on one side of the page and advancing to “complex” organisms on the opposite side of the page (almost invariably a human being). We have all seen this enduring image and likely have some version of it burned into our brains.
    [Show full text]
  • When Entertainment Meets Science: Summit Boosts Innovative Education JAMES UNDERDOWN
    SI May June 11 CUT_SI new design masters 3/25/11 10:01 AM Page 5 [ NEWS AND COMMENT When Entertainment Meets Science: Summit Boosts Innovative Education JAMES UNDERDOWN Can the entertainment media, with their formidable skills, help educate young people about science? That was just one of the hopes as the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) hosted the unusual Summit on Science, En ter - tainment, and Education at the Paley Center for Media in Beverly Hills, Cal- ifornia, on February 4, 2011. The all-day symposium featured a top- shelf lineup of speakers from all over the United States on the status and direction of science education today. Each of its From left: Superstring theorist Brian Greene, writer/director/producer Jerry Zucker, and educator Tyler Johnstone three categories (science, entertainment, discuss ways to attract students to the world of science. and education) was well represented by in- novators in their respective fields with rel- her students to testify how they are drawn tainment who need help with content. evant knowledge and experience. toward science. In this day and age of Thanks to a $225,000 grant from the From the world of science, luminaries myriad distractions, catching the eye of Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, such as Ralph Cicerone, NAS president; students is more of a challenge than ever. the Ex change “is seeking proposals to es- Sean B. Carroll, biologist; and Charles But the program didn’t begin and end tablish collaborative partnerships among Vest, president of the National Academy with a group of experts bemoaning the scientists, entertainment industry profes- of Engineering and president emeritus of failures of the education system and sionals, and educators to develop educa- the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pointing fingers at Hollywood schlock tional products or services that effectively were present.
    [Show full text]
  • Kayla Marie Swanson
    What the Puck? The Gentle Wind Project, a Quasi-Religious New Age Alternative Healing Organization by Kayla Marie Swanson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Religious Studies University of Alberta © Kayla Marie Swanson, 2015 ii Abstract The quasi-religious space is important for examining groups and organizations that exhibit qualities of both the sacred and the secular, particularly when groups have a vested interest in being perceived as either secular or sacred. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the Gentle Wind Project, a quasi-religious, New Age alternative healing movement, and to demonstrate how the group fit the category of quasi-religious. First I examined the category of quasi-religion, using Scientology and Transcendental Meditation as two examples of it, followed by examining the religious and secular aspects of Gentle Wind. As part of the examination of Gentle Wind as a quasi-religion, this thesis also briefly explores the role of the internet for Gentle Wind and critics, as well as examines one of the main lawsuits in which the group was involved. Gentle Wind ultimately sued former members and critics over statements made about the group online, and the results of this lawsuit have implications for a long-standing debate within the sociology of religion. This debate revolves around the reliability of former member testimony regarding groups with which they were previously affiliated. In order to conduct my analysis, I followed two research methods. First, I relied heavily on primary source material regarding the Gentle Wind Project, which required me to use an archival methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biography of America's Lake Monster
    REVIEWS] The Biography of America’s Lake Monster BENJAMIN RADFORD obert Bartholomew and his broth- er Paul grew up near the shores Rof Lake Champlain, which not The Untold Story of Champ: A Social History of America’s only sparked an early interest in the Loch Ness Monster. By Robert E. Bartholomew. lake monster said to dwell within the State University of New York Press, lake but also steeped them in the social Albany, New York, 2012. ISBN: 978-1-4384-4484-0. and cultural context of the mysterious 253 pp. Paperback, $24.95. beastie. In his new book, The Untold Story of Champ: A Social History of America’s Loch Ness Monster, Robert, a sociologist, Fortean investigator, and former broadcast journalist, takes a fresh look at Champ, long dubbed “America’s Loch Ness Monster.” Roy Mackal, and others who con- the Mansi photo, “New Information There have only been a handful of vened a 1981 conference titled, “Does Surfaces on ‘World’s Best Lake Mon- other books dealing in any depth or Champ Exist? A Scientific Seminar.” ster Photo,’ Raising Questions,” May/ scholarship with Champ, among them The intrigue between and among these June 2013.) Joe Zarzynski’s Champ: Beyond the Leg- researchers is interesting enough to fill Like virtually all “unexplained” phe- end, and of course Lake Monster Mys- several chapters. nomena, the history of Champ is in teries: Investigating the World’s Most There are several good books about part a history of hoaxes, and the book Elusive Creatures, coauthored by Joe the people involved in the search for examines several of them in detail, in- Nickell and myself.
    [Show full text]