DOCSLIB.ORG

Geodesy, Coordinate Systems, and Map Projections Objectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geodesy, Coordinate Systems, and Map Projections Objectives Geodesy, Coordinate Systems, Objectives and Map Projections • Introduce the main concepts of geodesy – coordinate systems, datums, ellipsoids, and geoids • Describe map projections and coordinate systems we use in GIS •Two key questions –what is the shape of the earth, and where are things on the earth? Our first references were local, relative, and Even today, addresses are qualitative. qualitative locations ASSIGNED by a government body, but how do we know the quantitative location? 3 4 1 ..with a coordinate “address,” also assigned by governments ....but, how is Lat/Lon defined, and or height, and what is this WGS84 business? Coordinates Differ Because: 1) Our best estimates of where things are have evolved over time (pre‐ and post‐satellite technologies (Geodesy) 2) We use different methods to “project” our data from the curved Earth surface to a flat map surface (Map Projections, next lecture) 5 6 Describe, as quantitatively and Geodesy: Why all the confusion? All measurements are relative to some reference, and our precisely as possible, where A and B best estimates of the reference have changed (better are measurements, better models). We started with, visualize the World, and still use 2‐ dimensional systems of coordinates. This won’t work for long distances, or the whole Earth. The Earth’s shape is approximately spherical, but irregular. We didn’t know this at first, and we’ve since discovered relative positions are changing (plate tectonics). 7 2 y For most the reaction is to: Cartesian Coordinates (right angle) • Establish an origin (starting reference, or Two dimensions, X and Y, reference frame) or 90o x • Identify, through measurements, the E and N locations of important “things” using this reference frame Two‐dimensional system most often used with All positions are relative to the origin and • Projected coordinates (maps and GIS) principal directions within this reference frame 9 9 Geodesy - science of measuring • Establish a reference frame • Identify, through measurements, the locations of the size and shape of the Earth important “things” using this reference frame Datum - a reference surface e.g., a site datum - a reference height against which elevations are measured (235,78) p3 p1 (Ferris State/ACSM) (10,30) p2 h1 (0,0)11 11 h2 h3 Datum height 3 Except for the Earth, our standard locations Datum Example were first, local “fixed” objects (large rock outcrops, placed monuments, then, estimated imaginary lines on the surface (Greenwich meridian, the Equator) then, the center of mass of the Earth, and standard axes 14 Datum Evolution Two Kinds of Surveying Pre 1500’s –Plane Surveying 1500’s to > We can assume the underlying Earth (our 1980s reference surface) is flat, with topographic changes over this flat base post 1980s > Only valid over “short distances” – Geodetic Surveying > Takes Earth’s curvature into account - our reference surface is curved > But the calculations become more complicated 15 16 4 Plane Surveying is Based on Horizontal and Surveying Methods Evolved Through Time Vertical Distance Measurement 1600s Horizontal measurements required “leveling” – either raising the end of the measuring rods to maintain a level measurement, or 1700s - measuring angles and calculating the horizontal distance 1800s 17 18 1800’s - early 1900‘s, improved precision, but same methods, over much larger scope and distances 1600’s - scales and optics 19 20 Wikimedia commons USGS 5 21 22 21 UNH Dimond Library USGS Earth Curvature Distortion How Big a Difference? Curved Distance, Straight line Angle, q Difference S Distance, C 1 second 30.8195 m 30.8195 m 0.0000 m 1 minute 1,894.5 m 1,894.5 0.0000 m 30 minutes = 0.5 degree 55.475 km 55.475 0.1760 m 1 degree 110.95 km 110.95 km 1.408 m 23 5 degrees 554.75 km 554.75 km 176.0 m 6 At some point, we have to move from a plane to a globe. What is our reference “surface” for a globe? It depends When we thought the World was a sphere, we invented a spherical system, with spherical references 25 26 Measuring Earth Size, Shape, and Location Horizontal location on a sphere, using Spherical of Points is Complicated Coordinates The Earth Isn’t Round • Use angles of rotation to define a directional vector The Continents are Moving • Use the length of a vector originating near the ellipsoid center to The Poles Wander define the location on the surface 27 27 7 Eratosthenes deduced the Earth’s Earth’s is Flattened - an Ellipsoid circumference to Two radii: within a few r1, along semi-major (through Equator) percent of our r2, along semi-minor (through poles) present estimate 30 Photobucket Contradictory Measurements, Cleared Up by the French No one could agree on the right size - Differening estimates of r1 and r2? - Different countries adopted different “standard” ellipsoids 8 Different Countries Adopted Different Ellipsoids as Datums Local or Regional Ellipsoid Why? Origin, R1, and R2 of ellipsoid specified such that separation •Surveys rarely spanned continents between ellipsoid and Geoid is small •Best fit differed These ellipsoids have names, e.g., Clarke 1880, or Bessel •Nationalism 33 33 Global Ellipsoid Selected so that these have the best fit “globally”, to sets of measurements taken across the globe. Generally have less appealing names, e.g. WGS84, or ITRF 2000 9 Different Ellipsoids Transforming Between in Different Countries Reference Surfaces There are locally “best fit” ellipsoids geoid Ellipsoid B We can transform positions from one ellipsoid to another via mathematical operations e.g., an origin shift, and mapping Ellipsoid from one surface to the next A Geocentric Ellipsoid and Coordinate System •3‐D Cartesian Z system •Origin (0,0,0) at the Earth center of mass •Best globally fit X spheroid, e.g., Y WGS84, used for global coordinate systems 10 The Earth’s True Shape a GEOID Why? Law of Gravity: Force = g x Massa x massb r2 Larger mass, stronger pull, and the Earth’s mass isn’t uniform throughout, e.g., near mountains, subsurface ore, deep mantle density variation42 11 The Geoid is a measured surface Definition of the Geoid A Geoid is the surface Gravimeter perpendicular to a plumb line, and for which the pull of gravity is a given value Note, there are at least three definitions of vertical •A plumb direction •The center of the celestial disk •Perpendicular to the adopted ellipsoid CIRES, U. of Colorado, and Gerd Steinle-Neumann, U. Bayerisches The Geoid is a measured surface Separation between the Geoid and best-fitting global ellipsoid averages about 30 meters – this “undulation” is always below 100 meters Gravimeter on a Satellite 12 We have three surfaces to keep track of “Horizontal” Position at each point on Earth Our position on 1.the ellipsoid the surface of the 2.the geoid, and 3.the physical surface Earth is defined by a latitude / longitude pair on a surface specified ellipsoid ellipsoid (also known as a spheroid) geoid Heights are usually specified Spheroidal Height relative to the Geoid Orthometric Height Heights above the geoid are orthometric heights These are the heights usually reported on topographic or other maps Earth Surface Heights above the ellipsoid are spheroidal heights Ellipsoid Sometimes used to define vertical position, but usually to specify geoid-ellipsoid separation Geoid 13 Defining a Datum Specifying a Horizontal Datum Horizontal Datum •Measure positions Specify the ellipsoid (celestial observations, Specify the coordinate locations of features surveys, satellite on this ellipsoidal surface tracking) • Adjust measurements to Vertical Datum account for geoid, Specify the ellipsoid determine position on Specify the Geoid – which set of adopted ellipsoid measurements will you use, or which model Specifying a Horizontal Datum Defining the Horizontal Datum Horizontal datums are realized through large A horizontal datum is a reference survey networks ellipsoid, plus a precisely-measured set of points that establish locations on 1. Define the shape of the Earth (the ellipsoid) the ellipsoid. 2. Define the location of a set of known points – control points – for which the position on the ellipsoid is precisely known These points define the reference 3. This is the reference surface and network surface against which all horizontal against which all other points will be measured positions are measured 14 Datum, Survey Network Astronomical Observations Were Historically: • Triangulation Network Accurate, but Time‐Consuming • Astronomical observation • Intermittent baselines • Multiple, redundant angle measurements Why these technologies? • Easy to measure angles • Difficult to measure distance accurately • Time consuming to measure point position accurately Horizontal Surface Measurements: Horizontal Surface Measurements Compensation Bars 15 Triangulation Triangulation S1 B S3 c If we measure the initial baseline length A, a and measure the angles a, b, and c, we are S1 B S3 c With the length C known, angles then able to calculate the lengths B and C: a e e, f, and g may then be measured. sine (a) The law of sines may be used with by the law of sines, _ = the now known distance C to A B sine (b) C calculate lengths E and F. sine (b) sine (c) A F Successive datum points may then = A and = A C sine (a) sine (a) be established to extend the network using primarily b angle measurements. b S2 f E g S2 S4 Horizontal Survey Benchmarks Survey Network, 1900 (from Schwartz, 1989) 16 1920s North American Datum of 1927, 26,000 measured points, Clarke 1866 1950s spheroid, fixed starting point in Kansas NAD27 survey network 1990s Survey NAD83 North American Datum 1983 Network, 1981 Successor to NAD27. 250,000 measurements points GRS80 Ellipsoid, No fixed stations (from Schwartz, 1989) (from Schwartz, 1989) 17 North American Datum of 1927, 26,000 measured points, Clarke 1866 NAD83 spheroid, fixed starting point in Kansas North American Datum 1983 Successor to NAD27.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11. Three Dimensional Analytic Geometry and Vectors
    Chapter 11. Three dimensional analytic geometry and vectors. Section 11.5 Quadric surfaces. Curves in R2 : x2 y2 ellipse + =1 a2 b2 x2 y2 hyperbola − =1 a2 b2 parabola y = ax2 or x = by2 A quadric surface is the graph of a second degree equation in three variables. The most general such equation is Ax2 + By2 + Cz2 + Dxy + Exz + F yz + Gx + Hy + Iz + J =0, where A, B, C, ..., J are constants. By translation and rotation the equation can be brought into one of two standard forms Ax2 + By2 + Cz2 + J =0 or Ax2 + By2 + Iz =0 In order to sketch the graph of a quadric surface, it is useful to determine the curves of intersection of the surface with planes parallel to the coordinate planes. These curves are called traces of the surface. Ellipsoids The quadric surface with equation x2 y2 z2 + + =1 a2 b2 c2 is called an ellipsoid because all of its traces are ellipses. 2 1 x y 3 2 1 z ±1 ±2 ±3 ±1 ±2 The six intercepts of the ellipsoid are (±a, 0, 0), (0, ±b, 0), and (0, 0, ±c) and the ellipsoid lies in the box |x| ≤ a, |y| ≤ b, |z| ≤ c Since the ellipsoid involves only even powers of x, y, and z, the ellipsoid is symmetric with respect to each coordinate plane. Example 1. Find the traces of the surface 4x2 +9y2 + 36z2 = 36 1 in the planes x = k, y = k, and z = k. Identify the surface and sketch it. Hyperboloids Hyperboloid of one sheet. The quadric surface with equations x2 y2 z2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Back-Scattering from Non-Spherical Scatterers
    REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 28 STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATION, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION VERA M. BINKS, Director RADAR BACK-SCATTERING FROM NON-SPHERICAL SCATTERERS PART 1 CROSS-SECTIONS OF CONDUCTING PROLATES AND SPHEROIDAL FUNCTIONS PART 11 CROSS-SECTIONS FROM NON-SPHERICAL RAINDROPS BY Prem N. Mathur and Eugam A. Mueller STATE WATER SURVEY DIVISION A. M. BUSWELL, Chief URBANA. ILLINOIS (Printed by authority of State of Illinois} REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 28 1955 STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION VERA M. BINKS, Director RADAR BACK-SCATTERING FROM NON-SPHERICAL SCATTERERS PART 1 CROSS-SECTIONS OF CONDUCTING PROLATES AND SPHEROIDAL FUNCTIONS PART 11 CROSS-SECTIONS FROM NON-SPHERICAL RAINDROPS BY Prem N. Mathur and Eugene A. Mueller STATE WATER SURVEY DIVISION A. M. BUSWELL, Chief URBANA, ILLINOIS (Printed by authority of State of Illinois) Definitions of Terms Part I semi minor axis of spheroid semi major axis of spheroid wavelength of incident field = a measure of size of particle prolate spheroidal coordinates = eccentricity of ellipse = angular spheroidal functions = Legendse polynomials = expansion coefficients = radial spheroidal functions = spherical Bessel functions = electric field vector = magnetic field vector = back scattering cross section = geometric back scattering cross section Part II = semi minor axis of spheroid = semi major axis of spheroid = Poynting vector = measure of size of spheroid = wavelength of the radiation = back scattering
    [Show full text]
  • John Ellipsoid 5.1 John Ellipsoid
    CSE 599: Interplay between Convex Optimization and Geometry Winter 2018 Lecture 5: John Ellipsoid Lecturer: Yin Tat Lee Disclaimer: Please tell me any mistake you noticed. The algorithm at the end is unpublished. Feel free to contact me for collaboration. 5.1 John Ellipsoid In the last lecture, we discussed that any convex set is very close to anp ellipsoid in probabilistic sense. More precisely, after renormalization by covariance matrix, we have kxk2 = n ± Θ(1) with high probability. In this lecture, we will talk about how convex set is close to an ellipsoid in a strict sense. If the convex set is isotropic, it is close to a sphere as follows: Theorem 5.1.1. Let K be a convex body in Rn in isotropic position. Then, rn + 1 B ⊆ K ⊆ pn(n + 1)B : n n n Roughly speaking, this says that any convex set can be approximated by an ellipsoid by a n factor. This result has a lot of applications. Although the bound is tight, making a body isotropic is pretty time- consuming. In fact, making a body isotropic is the current bottleneck for obtaining faster algorithm for sampling in convex sets. Currently, it can only be done in O∗(n4) membership oracle plus O∗(n5) total time. Problem 5.1.2. Find a faster algorithm to approximate the covariance matrix of a convex set. In this lecture, we consider another popular position of a convex set called John position and its correspond- ing ellipsoid is called John ellipsoid. Definition 5.1.3. Given a convex set K.
    [Show full text]
  • Meyers Height 1
    University of Connecticut DigitalCommons@UConn Peer-reviewed Articles 12-1-2004 What Does Height Really Mean? Part I: Introduction Thomas H. Meyer University of Connecticut, [email protected] Daniel R. Roman National Geodetic Survey David B. Zilkoski National Geodetic Survey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/thmeyer_articles Recommended Citation Meyer, Thomas H.; Roman, Daniel R.; and Zilkoski, David B., "What Does Height Really Mean? Part I: Introduction" (2004). Peer- reviewed Articles. Paper 2. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/thmeyer_articles/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UConn. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peer-reviewed Articles by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UConn. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Land Information Science What does height really mean? Part I: Introduction Thomas H. Meyer, Daniel R. Roman, David B. Zilkoski ABSTRACT: This is the first paper in a four-part series considering the fundamental question, “what does the word height really mean?” National Geodetic Survey (NGS) is embarking on a height mod- ernization program in which, in the future, it will not be necessary for NGS to create new or maintain old orthometric height benchmarks. In their stead, NGS will publish measured ellipsoid heights and computed Helmert orthometric heights for survey markers. Consequently, practicing surveyors will soon be confronted with coping with these changes and the differences between these types of height. Indeed, although “height’” is a commonly used word, an exact definition of it can be difficult to find. These articles will explore the various meanings of height as used in surveying and geodesy and pres- ent a precise definition that is based on the physics of gravitational potential, along with current best practices for using survey-grade GPS equipment for height measurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Errors Caused by GPS Height of Instrument Blunders Thomas H
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Department of Natural Resources and the Thomas H. Meyer's Peer-reviewed Articles Environment July 2005 Position Errors Caused by GPS Height of Instrument Blunders Thomas H. Meyer University of Connecticut, [email protected] April Hiscox University of Connecticut Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/thmeyer_articles Recommended Citation Meyer, Thomas H. and Hiscox, April, "Position Errors Caused by GPS Height of Instrument Blunders" (2005). Thomas H. Meyer's Peer-reviewed Articles. 4. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/thmeyer_articles/4 Survey Review, 38, 298 (October 2005) SURVEY REVIEW No.298 October 2005 Vol.38 CONTENTS (part) Position errors caused by GPS height of instrument blunders 262 T H Meyer and A L Hiscox This paper was published in the October 2005 issue of the UK journal, SURVEY REVIEW. This document is the copyright of CASLE. Requests to make copies should be made to the Editor, see www.surveyreview.org for contact details. The Commonwealth Association of Surveying and Land Economy does not necessarily endorse any opinions or recommendations made in an article, review, or extract contained in this Review nor do they necessarily represent CASLE policy CASLE 2005 261 Survey Review, 38, 298 (October 2005 POSITION ERRORS CAUSED BY GPS HEIGHT OF INSTRUMENT BLUNDERS POSITION ERRORS CAUSED BY GPS HEIGHT OF INSTRUMENT BLUNDERS T. H. Meyer and A. L. Hiscox Department of Natural Resources Management and Engineering University of Connecticut ABSTRACT Height of instrument (HI) blunders in GPS measurements cause position errors. These errors can be pure vertical, pure horizontal, or a mixture of both.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Positioning System the Global Positioning System
    The Global Positioning System The Global Positioning System 1. System Overview 2. Biases and Errors 3. Signal Structure and Observables 4. Absolute v. Relative Positioning 5. GPS Field Procedures 6. Ellipsoids, Datums and Coordinate Systems 7. Mission Planning I. System Overview ! GPS is a passive navigation and positioning system available worldwide 24 hours a day in all weather conditions developed and maintained by the Department of Defense ! The Global Positioning System consists of three segments: ! Space Segment ! Control Segment ! User Segment Space Segment Space Segment ! The current GPS constellation consists of 29 Block II/IIA/IIR/IIR-M satellites. The first Block II satellite was launched in February 1989. Control Segment User Segment How it Works II. Biases and Errors Biases GPS Error Sources • Satellite Dependent ? – Orbit representation ? Satellite Orbit Error Satellite Clock Error including 12 biases ? 9 3 Selective Availability 6 – Satellite clock model biases Ionospheric refraction • Station Dependent L2 L1 – Receiver clock biases – Station Coordinates Tropospheric Delay • Observation Multi- pathing Dependent – Ionospheric delay 12 9 3 – Tropospheric delay Receiver Clock Error 6 1000 – Carrier phase ambiguity Satellite Biases ! The satellite is not where the GPS broadcast message says it is. ! The satellite clocks are not perfectly synchronized with GPS time. Station Biases ! Receiver clock time differs from satellite clock time. ! Uncertainties in the coordinates of the station. ! Time transfer and orbital tracking. Observation Dependent Biases ! Those associated with signal propagation Errors ! Residual Biases ! Cycle Slips ! Multipath ! Antenna Phase Center Movement ! Random Observation Error Errors ! In addition to biases factors effecting position and/or time determined by GPS is dependant upon: ! The geometric strength of the satellite configuration being observed (DOP).
    [Show full text]
  • Is Mount Everest Higher Now Than 100 Years
    Is Mount Everest higher now than 155 years ago?' Giorgio Poretti All human works are subject to error, and it is only in the power of man to guard against its intrusion by care and attention. (George Everest) Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica CER Telegeomatica - Università di Trieste Foreword One day in the Spring of 1852 at Dehra Dun, India, in the foot hills of the Himalayas, the door of the office of the Director General of the Survey of India opens. Enters Radanath Sikdar, the chief of the team of human computers who were processing the data of the triangulation measurements of the Himalayan peaks taken during the Winter. "Sir I have discovered the highest mountain of the world…….it is Peak n. XV". These words, reported by Col. Younghausband have become a legend in the measurement of Mt. Everest. Introduction The height of a mountain is determined by three main factors. The first is the sea level that would be under the mountain if the water could flow freely under the continents. The second depends on the accuracy of the elevations of the points in the valley from which the measurements are performed, and on the mareograph taken as a reference (height datum). The third factor depends on the amount of snow on the summit. This changes from season to season and from year to year with a variation that exceeds a metre between spring and autumn. Optical measurements from a long distance are also heavily influenced by the refraction of the atmosphere (due to the difference of pressure and temperature between the points of observation in the valley and the summit), and by the plumb-line deflections.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Aberrations OPTI 518 Lecture 13
    Introduction to aberrations OPTI 518 Lecture 13 Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 518 Topics • Aspheric surfaces • Stop shifting • Field curve concept Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 518 Aspheric Surfaces • Meaning not spherical • Conic surfaces: Sphere, prolate ellipsoid, hyperboloid, paraboloid, oblate ellipsoid or spheroid • Cartesian Ovals • Polynomial surfaces • Infinite possibilities for an aspheric surface • Ray tracing for quadric surfaces uses closed formulas; for other surfaces iterative algorithms are used Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 518 Aspheric surfaces The concept of the sag of a surface 2 cS 4 6 8 10 ZS ASASASAS4 6 8 10 ... 1 1 K ( c2 1 ) 2 S Sxy222 K 2 K is the conic constant K=0, sphere K=-1, parabola C is 1/r where r is the radius of curvature; K is the K<-1, hyperola conic constant (the eccentricity squared); -1<K<0, prolate ellipsoid A’s are aspheric coefficients K>0, oblate ellipsoid Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 518 Conic surfaces focal properties • Focal points for Ellipsoid case mirrors Hyperboloid case Oblate ellipsoid • Focal points of lenses K n2 Hecht-Zajac Optics Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 518 Refraction at a spherical surface Aspheric surface description 2 cS 4 6 8 10 ZS ASASASAS4 6 8 10 ... 1 1 K ( c2 1 ) 2 S 1122 2222 22 y x Aicrasphe y 1 x 4 K y Zx 28rr Prof. Jose Sasian OTI 518P Cartesian Ovals ln l'n' Cte . Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 518 Aspheric cap Aspheric surface The aspheric surface can be thought of as comprising a base sphere and an aspheric cap Cap Spherical base surface Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • DOTD Standards for GPS Data Collection Accuracy
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center Final Report 539 DOTD Standards for GPS Data Collection Accuracy by Joshua D. Kent Clifford Mugnier J. Anthony Cavell Larry Dunaway Louisiana State University 4101 Gourrier Avenue | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 (225) 767-9131 | (225) 767-9108 fax | www.ltrc.lsu.edu TECHNICAL STANDARD PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/LA.539 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date DOTD Standards for GPS Data Collection Accuracy September 2015 6. Performing Organization Code 127-15-4158 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kent, J. D., Mugnier, C., Cavell, J. A., & Dunaway, L. Louisiana State University Center for GeoInformatics 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Center for Geoinformatics Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. Louisiana State University LTRC Project Number: 13-6GT Baton Rouge, LA 70803 State Project Number: 30001520 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Louisiana Department of Transportation and Final Report Development 6/30/2014 P.O. Box 94245 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The Center for GeoInformatics at Louisiana State University conducted a three-part study addressing accurate, precise, and consistent positional control for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. First, this study focused on Departmental standards of practice when utilizing Global Navigational Satellite Systems technology for mapping-grade applications. Second, the recent enhancements to the nationwide horizontal and vertical spatial reference framework (i.e., datums) is summarized in order to support consistent and accurate access to the National Spatial Reference System.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire
    13 · Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire o. A. w. DILKE We have already emphasized that in the period of the A further stimulus to large-scale surveying and map­ early empire1 the Greek contribution to the theory and ping practice in the early empire was given by the land practice of small-scale mapping, culminating in the work reforms undertaken by the Flavians. In particular, a new of Ptolemy, largely overshadowed that of Rome. A dif­ outlook both on administration and on cartography ferent view must be taken of the history of large-scale came with the accession of Vespasian (T. Flavius Ves­ mapping. Here we can trace an analogous culmination pasianus, emperor A.D. 69-79). Born in the hilly country of the Roman bent for practical cartography. The foun­ north of Reate (Rieti), a man of varied and successful dations for a land surveying profession, as already noted, military experience, including the conquest of southern had been laid in the reign of Augustus. Its expansion Britain, he overcame his rivals in the fierce civil wars of had been occasioned by the vast program of colonization A.D. 69. The treasury had been depleted under Nero, carried out by the triumvirs and then by Augustus him­ and Vespasian was anxious to build up its assets. Fron­ self after the civil wars. Hyginus Gromaticus, author of tinus, who was a prominent senator throughout the Fla­ a surveying treatise in the Corpus Agrimensorum, tells vian period (A.D. 69-96), stresses the enrichment of the us that Augustus ordered that the coordinates of surveys treasury by selling to colonies lands known as subseciva.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodetic Position Computations
    GEODETIC POSITION COMPUTATIONS E. J. KRAKIWSKY D. B. THOMSON February 1974 TECHNICALLECTURE NOTES REPORT NO.NO. 21739 PREFACE In order to make our extensive series of lecture notes more readily available, we have scanned the old master copies and produced electronic versions in Portable Document Format. The quality of the images varies depending on the quality of the originals. The images have not been converted to searchable text. GEODETIC POSITION COMPUTATIONS E.J. Krakiwsky D.B. Thomson Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 4400 Fredericton. N .B. Canada E3B5A3 February 197 4 Latest Reprinting December 1995 PREFACE The purpose of these notes is to give the theory and use of some methods of computing the geodetic positions of points on a reference ellipsoid and on the terrain. Justification for the first three sections o{ these lecture notes, which are concerned with the classical problem of "cCDputation of geodetic positions on the surface of an ellipsoid" is not easy to come by. It can onl.y be stated that the attempt has been to produce a self contained package , cont8.i.ning the complete development of same representative methods that exist in the literature. The last section is an introduction to three dimensional computation methods , and is offered as an alternative to the classical approach. Several problems, and their respective solutions, are presented. The approach t~en herein is to perform complete derivations, thus stqing awrq f'rcm the practice of giving a list of for11111lae to use in the solution of' a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Surveying and Mapping Minor Form
    The Ohio State University College of Engineering Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering Surveying and Mapping Minor (SURVMAP-MN) Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering Details for the required minor courses are listed below. Many 470 Hitchcock Hall, 2070 Neil Avenue Columbus, OH 43210 of the courses are only offered once per year. http://ceg.ohio-state.edu Surveying and Mapping Minor Program Guidelines Surveying is a crucial part of land development. Professional Surveyors must have a Bachelor of Science in Civil Required for graduation: No Engineering or Surveying and Mapping, and often work Credit hours required: A minimum of 19 credit hours is closely with architects and builders to produce precise required to complete the Surveying and Mapping minor. surveys and maps of surface features of the earth. Surveyors Transfer and EM credit hours allowed: No more than 6 (six) of can choose from many specialties and get involved at many the credit hours required for the minor can come from stages of a project. Students who pursue a Surveying and transfer or EM credit. Mapping minor will gain an understanding of global Overlap with the major: positioning; analyzing spatial data; digital map production • The minor must be in a different subject that the major and electronic data collection; survey software applications, • The minor must contain a minimum of 12 hours boundary surveying and construction layout techniques. distinct from the major and/or additional Students interested in pursuing a career in professional land minor(s). surveying should consider completing the Surveying and Civil Engineering Majors: The following courses will count as Mapping minor.
    [Show full text]