DOCSLIB.ORG

Anthropogenic Causation and Prevention Relating to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anthropogenic Causation and Prevention Relating to The ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; XIJDITPDJFUZIBTEFSJWFEUIFCBTJTPGJUTBHSJDVMUVSFBOE Anthropogenic NFEJDJOF .ZFST ɨFëSTUSFBTPOIJHIMJHIUTUIFDVMUVSBMJNQPSUBODF Causation and PGOBUVSFɨFFYJTUFODFPGPSHBOJTNTBSFBOJOUFHSBMQBSU PGIVNBODVMUVSFTNBOZìPSBBOEGBVOBBSFFTTFOUJBMUP Prevention Relating to IVNBOMJWFMJIPPET USBEJUJPOT BSU BOEBFTUIFUJDBMMZQMFBTJOH naturalFOWJSPONFOUTɨFJEFBUIBUUIFiPCTFSWBUJPOBOE the Holocene Extinction DPOUFNQMBUJPOwPGUIFOBUVSBMXPSMEIBTFTTFOUJBMMZTIBQFE NBOZBTQFDUTPGIVNBODJWJMJ[BUJPOJNQMJFTUIBUMPTTPGOBUVSF Jesse S. Browning XJMMJOUVSOIBWFBEFUSJNFOUBMJNQBDUPO)VNBOJUZ +FQTPO English 225 BOE$BOOFZ ɨJTFTUBCMJTIFTPOFSFBTPOXIZIVNBOT WBMVFDPOTFSWBUJPOPGOBUVSF Introduction 4FDPOE JUJTVOFUIJDBMGPSIVNBOCFJOHTUPESJWFPUIFS ɨFUVNVMUVPVTTUBUFPGUIFCJPTQIFSFJTMBSHFMZBUUSJCVUBCMF TQFDJFTUPFYUJODUJPOɨJTCFMJFGJNQMJFTUIBUUIFIVNBO UPBOUISPQPHFOJDJOQVUBOETFWFSBMBTQFDUTPGUIJTDPNQMFY DBQBDJUZGPSDPNQBTTJPO BOEUIFQSPQFOTJUZGPSQFPQMFUPCF TJUVBUJPOBSFXPSUIZPGDPOTJEFSBUJPOɨFBJNPGUIJTQBQFSJT DPNQBTTJPOBUFUPXBSETPUIFSPSHBOJTNT JTPOFPGUIFiUPPMTw UPGVSUIFSVOEFSTUBOEUIFMPTTPGCJPEJWFSTJUZUIBUJTDVSSFOUMZ UIBUDPOTFSWBUJPOJTUTPGUFOVTFJOUIFOBNFPGDPOTFSWBUJPO UBLJOHQMBDF0QJOJPOTUFOEUPEJêFSSFHBSEJOHUIFSFMBUJWF $POTFSWBUJPOJTUTGPDVTFêPSUTPOXIBUBSFDPOTJEFSFE JNQPSUBODFPGJTTVFTPGTVDINBHOJUVEFɨFDVSSFOUMPTT iDIBSJTNBUJDwDSFBUVSFT$IBSJTNBUJDDSFBUVSFTBSFUIPTFTQFDJFT PGCJPEJWFSTJUZJTFWPMVUJPOBSJMZJNQPSUBOUBTJUJTDVSSFOUMZ DPOTJEFSFECZNBOZUPCFDVUF DVEEMZ PSCFBVUJGVMBOJNBMT JNQBDUJOHUIFUSFOEPGMJGFPO&BSUI TVDIBT1BOEBT 5JHFST BOE1PMBS#FBST FUD *OPSEFSUPBDIJFWFBCFUUFSVOEFSTUBOEJOHPGTBJEJTTVFJU ɨJSE JTUIFJNQPSUBODFPGTPDJPFDPOPNJDNBUUFSTBT JTVTFGVMUPFYBNJOFUIFFTUJNBUFTSFHBSEJOHCPUIDVSSFOU BOE UIFZSFMBUFUPUIFOBUVSBMXPSMEɨFSFMBUJPOTIJQCFUXFFO CBDLHSPVOE SBUFTPGFYUJODUJPOBTXFMMBTIPXHomo sapiens the health and function of the natural world, ecosystems, GBDUPSJOUPUIFFRVBUJPO'JSTU XFNVTUBDDPVOUGPSUIFJEFB and the health and function of societies and their economies UIBUIVNBOWBMVFTTIBQFPVSHPBMTJOSFHBSETUPNBJOUBJOJOH JTJOFYUSJDBCMF BOEPGUFOPWFSMPPLFE*OPSEFSUPDPOUJOVF CJPEJWFSTJUZɨFO FYQMPSFIPXBOUISPQPHFOJDGBDUPSTNBZ UPFOKPZUIFCFOFëUTPGGVODUJPOBMTPDJFUJFTBOEFDPOPNJFT CFEJSFDUMZJOìVFODJOHUIJTQIFOPNFOPOCZTVSWFZJOHTPNF IVNBOTNVTUEFWPUFNPSFFOFSHZUPXBSETNBJOUBJOJOH IVNBODBVTFTPGCJPEJWFSTJUZMPTT4VCTFRVFOUMZ JUJTQPTTJCMF IFBMUIGVMFDPTZTUFNT#JPUJDBOEBCJPUJDOBUVSBMSFTPVSDFTBSF UPMPPLBUDPVSTFTPGBDUJPOUIBUXJMMVQIPMEIVNBOWBMVFT BOJOUFHSBMQBSUPGIVNBOBDUJWJUJFT BOEBTUIFTFSFTPVSDFT SFHBSEJOHPVSSFMBUJPOTIJQTXJUIPUIFSPSHBOJTNTBOEOBUVSBM EJNJOJTI TPXJMMUIFDPOEJUJPOPGTPDJFUZ4PNFNBJOUFOBODF QSPDFTTFT PGUIFOBUVSBMXPSMEUIBUTVTUBJOTIVNBOJUZJTVOBWPJEBCMF Importance of Biodiversity -BTUMZ BHSJDVMUVS FBOENFEJDJOFBSFCPUIIJHIMZEFSJWFE 1SFTFSWBUJPOPGCJPEJWFSTJUZJTFTTFOUJBMMZUIFQSFTFSWBUJPOPG GSPNPSHBOJTNT FTQFDJBMMZìPSB"TXFEFDSFBTFUIFOVNCFSTPG OBUVSFBOEJTDPOTJEFSFEJNQPSUBOUCBTFEQSJNBSJMZPOIVNBO QMBOUTBOEBOJNBMT XFBMTPEFDSFBTFUIFQPTTJCJMJUJFTPGëOEJOH WBMVFT+FQTPOBOE$BOOFZ QSFTFOUBXFMMDPNQJMFE OFXXBZTJOXIJDIUIFTFPSHBOJTNTDBOCFOFëUIVNBOJUZ MJTUPGUIFQSFFNJOFOUSFBTPOTGPSNBJOUBJOJOHCJPEJWFSTJUZ PS Extinction Rate Estimates iOBUVSF wUIFZTUBUF 1SFTFOUFEFYUJODUJPOSBUFTPGUFODPNQBSFDVSSFOUBOE BFTUIFUJDBOEJOUFMMFDUVBMDPOUFNQMBUJPOPGOBUVSFJT CBDLHSPVOEFTUJNBUFT&YUSBQPMBUJPOTGSPNBWBJMBCMFEBUB JOUFHSBMUPUIFCJPMPHJDBMBOEDVMUVSBMJOIFSJUBODFPGNBOZ UFOEUPZJFMEWBSJBCMFSFTVMUTEVFUPMJNJUBUJPOTJOIFSFOUUP QFPQMFT 8JMTPO FTUBCMJTIJOHCPUIDVSSFOUBOECBDLHSPVOESBUFTPGFYUJODUJPO IVNBOTMBDLUIFSJHIUUPDBVTFLOPXJOHMZUIFFYUJODUJPOT *UJTTVHHFTUFEUIBUXFNBZDVSSFOUMZCFFYQFSJFODJOHBNBTT PGBOPUIFSMJGFGPSN -FPQPME FYUJODUJPO XIJDIJTEFëOFEBTBMPTTJOHSFBUFSUIBOPG TQFDJFTBSFDSJUJDBMDPNQPOFOUTPGUIFIFBMUIZFDPTZTUFNT TQFDJFTXJUIJOPOFNJMMJPOZFBSTɨFEFëOJUJPOJUTFMGJTEJïDVMU OFDFTTBSZUPTVQQPSUFDPOPNJDBOETPDJBMEFWFMPQNFOU UPBQQMZEVFUPUIFMBSHFUFNQPSBMTDBMFBOESFMJBODFPOBO &ISMJDI&ISMJDI BOE FTUJNBUFEUPUBMOVNCFSPGTQFDJFT JUJTQSVEFOUUPNBJOUBJOUIF&BSUITHFOFUJDMJCSBSZGSPN HOHONU Volume 8 2010 - 25 ɨFSFJTNVDIVODFSUBJOUZJOFTUBCMJTIJOHFYUJODUJPOSBUFT UIJTJOWBTJWFTQFDJFTDPSSFMBUFTUPBESBNBUJDEFDMJOFJOCPUI CFDBVTFIJTUPSJDBMFYUJODUJPOSBUFFTUJNBUFTBSFEFQFOEFOU BQQSFDJBCMFIBCJUBUSFEVDUJPOBOEFYUJODUJPOBNPOHOBUJWF POUIFGPTTJMSFDPSE BOEUIFSFGPSFTVCKFDUUPCJBTFTBOEHBQT CJSETQFDJFTPOUIFJTMBOEPG(VBN 4BWJEHF )BCJUBU GPVOEXJUIJOUIFGPTTJMSFDPSEɨFDVSSFOUSBUFFTUJNBUFT EFTUSVDUJPO NPSFTQFDJëDBMMZIBCJUBUGSBHNFOUBUJPOIBTIBE BMTPIBWFMJNJUBUJPOT NBJOMZUIBUXFSFBMMZEPOPULOPXIPX BTJNJMBSMZOFHBUJWFJNQBDUPOOVNFSPVTTQFDJFT)BCJUBU NBOZTQFDJFTFYJTUFE&TUJNBUFTGPSDVSSFOUMZFYUBOUTQFDJFT GSBHNFOUBUJPOJODSFBTFTFYUJODUJPOUISFTIPMETPGTFMFDUFETQFDJFT SBOHFXJEFMZiCFUXFFO NJMMJPOBOENJMMJPOw .BZ BOEJOUIFXBLFPGIBCJUBUGSBHNFOUBUJPO TQFDJFTTVCTFRVFOUMZ &SXJO(BTUPO<3FHBO> ɨJTJMMVTUSBUFT SFRVJSFHSFBUFSIBCJUBUBSFBTUPSFNBJOWJBCMF 'BISJH UIFHSFBUBNPVOUPGVODFSUBJOUZJOTVDIFTUJNBUFT4JNJMBSMZ Anthropogenic Prevention UIFGPTTJMSFDPSEPêFSTMJUUMFJOTJHIUJOUPOVNCFSTPGTQFDJFT UIBUXFSFQSFTFOUTJODFMJGFCFHBOPO&BSUIFYUJODUJPOSBUF ɨFSFBSFOVNFSPVTXBZTUPBQQSPBDIUIFQSPCMFNPG FTUJNBUFTTIPVMEUIFSFGPSFCFDPOTJEFSFEDSJUJDBMMZ&YUJODUJPO DPOTFSWJOHCJPEJWFSTJUZ0OFPGUIFNPSFQSPNJOFOUHMPCBM SBUFFTUJNBUFTXIJDIBSFPGUFOQSFTFOUFEIBWFUIFBCJMJUZUP BQQSPBDIFTJTUIBUPGIPUTQPUJEFOUJëDBUJPO)PUTQPUTBSFBSFBT HSBCUIFBUUFOUJPOPGQFPQMFBOESBJTFDPODFSOPWFSUIFTUBUFPG UIBUFYIJCJUIJHIMFWFMTPGFOEFNJTN TQFDJFTSJDIOFTTBOETVêFS CJPUB$SJUJDBMPCTFSWFSTTIPVMESFBMJ[FUIBUTVDIFTUJNBUFTBSF GSPNIBCJUBUEFHSBEBUJPO 3FJE 5XFOUZëWFPGUIFTF QPUFOUJBMMZJOBDDVSBUF SFHJPOTIBWFCFFOJEFOUJëFEXPSMEXJEF ɨFBVUIPSTPGUIFBSUJDMFiɨF$VSSFODZBOE5FNQPPG ɨFHFOFSBMBJNPGUIFIPUTQPUBQQSPBDIJTUPNBJOUBJO &YUJODUJPO wGFFMDPOëEFOUFOPVHIJOUIFJSJOUFSQSFUBUJPOPG UIFHSFBUFTUOVNCFSPGTQFDJFTGPSUIFMFBTUDPTUɨJTPCKFDUJWF BWBJMBCMFEBUBUPDPODMVEFiɨFSFJTMJUUMFEPVCUUIBUTQFDJFT JTëOFGPSBQSJWBUFPSHBOJ[BUJPOTVDIBT$POTFSWBUJPO BSFHPJOHFYUJODUFYUSFNFMZSBQJEMZBOEUIBUXFBSFJOUIF *OUFSOBUJPOBMHPWFSONFOUTBOEPUIFSBHFODJFTUIBUJNQMFNFOU NJETUPGBNBKPSFYUJODUJPOJOUFSWBMw 3FHBO 4VDIB DPOTFSWBUJPOFêPSUT IPXFWFS NVTUDPOTJEFSUIFWBMVFTPG TUBUFNFOUJTTVQQPSUFECZEBUBTVHHFTUJOHiUIBUUIFSFIBWFCFFO UIFQFPQMFUIFZSFQSFTFOU"OBSSPXPCKFDUJWFTVDIBTUIBUPG BQQSPYJNBUFMZBOJNBMFYUJODUJPOTBOEQMBOUFYUJODUJPOT UIFIPUTQPUBQQSPBDINJHIUGBJMUPBDDPVOUGPSNBOZPGUIFTF SFDPSEFEHMPCBMMZTJODFw .BZFUBM ɨFBWBJMBCMF IVNBOWBMVFT +FQTPO )VNBOTUFOEUPQMBDFEJêFSFOU EBUBBMTPTVHHFTUUIBUUIFGSFRVFODZPGUIFTFFYUJODUJPOTIBT WBMVFTPOEJêFSFOUTQFDJFTEVFUPCJBTFTCBTFEPODVMUVSBM JODSFBTFEESBNBUJDBMMZJOUIFQBTUZST 3FHBO ɨFSFJTB JNQPSUBODFɨFIPUTQPUBQQSPBDIGBJMTUPEJêFSFOUJBUFCFUXFFO DPOTFOTVTUIBUXFBSFJOBQFSJPEPGSBQJEFYUJODUJPO BOEUIBU UIFSFMBUJWFWBMVFTPGJOEJWJEVBMTQFDJFT IVNBOTBSFQBSUMZSFTQPOTJCMF "OPUIFSQSPHSBNBJNFEBUNBJOUBJOJOHCJPMPHJDBM EJWFSTJUZJTUIF("1BOBMZTJTQSPHSBNɨJTQSPHSBNJTOPU Anthropogenic Causation ZFUHMPCBM JOTUFBEJUGVODUJPOTQSJNBSJMZJOUIF6OJUFE4UBUFT )VNBOBDUJWJUJFTIBWFHSFBUMZJNQBDUFENBOZPGUIF $POTJEFSBCMFIFBEXBZIBTCFFONBEFJONBQQJOHUIFCJPMPHJDBM PUIFSPSHBOJTNTPOFBSUI4VDIQSPDFTTFTJODMVEFQPMMVUJPO SFTPVSDFTPGUIFDPVOUSZPOBTUBUFCZTUBUFCBTJT +FOOJOHT PWFSFYQMPJUBUJPO JOUSPEVDUJPOPGJOWBTJWFTQFDJFT IBCJUBU ɨJTQSPBDUJWFBQQSPBDIDPNQJMFTEBUBDPODFSOJOH EFTUSVDUJPO BOEEJTFBTF*OUSPEVDFEOPOOBUJWF PSiJOWBTJWFw FYUBOUTQFDJFTBOEUIFJSDVSSFOUMFWFMTPGQSPUFDUJPO TQFDJFTIBWFIBEBUSFNFOEPVTJNQBDUPOOBUJWFTQFDJFTUIBUEJE 'SPNUIJTEBUB JUJTFWJEFOUXIFSFUIFAHBQTJO OPUDPFWPMWFXJUITVDIDPNQFUJUPSTPSQSFEBUPSTSFTVMUJOH DPOTFSWBUJPOBSF*OBOFêPSUUPBDIJFWFSFQSFTFOUBUJWFOFTT JOUIFJOUSPEVDUJPOJOWBTJWFTQFDJFTBOEIBCJUBUGSBHNFOUBUJPO JODPOTFSWBUJPO VOEFSSFQSFTFOUFETQFDJFTBOEIBCJUBUUZQFT "TBSFTVMU UIFOBUJWFTQFDJFTFYIJCJUOBJWFUÏBOESBSFMZPVU DBOUIVTCFHJWFOBEEJUJPOBMBUUFOUJPOɨSPVHIBCFUUFS DPNQFUFUIFSFDFOUMZJOUSPEVDFETQFDJFT0OFQSPGPVOE VOEFSTUBOEJOHPGUIFCJPMPHJDBMJOWFOUPSZJOUIFDPVOUSZ UIF FYBNQMFPGUIJTJTCJSETPOJTMBOETXIFSFQSFEBUPSTXFSF ("1QSPHSBNJTUIFOBCMFUPJOìVFODFMBOENBOBHFNFOU QSFWJPVTMZBCTFOU #MBDLCVSO QSBDUJDFT"OJOUFSFTUJOHFMFNFOUPGUIJTQSPBDUJWFBQQSPBDIJT &VSPQFBOBSSJWBMPOPDFBOJDJTMBOETIBTSFTVMUFEJOUIF UIBUJUBUUFNQUTUPNBJOUBJOWJBCJMJUZPGQPQVMBUJPOTCFGPSFUIFZ JOUSPEVDUJPOPGNBNNBMJBOQSFEBUPSTɨFSFJTBQPTJUJWF BSFSFEVDFEUPUIFQPJOUPGCFDPNJOHFOEBOHFSFEPSGFEFSBMMZ DPSSFMBUJPOCFUXFFOUIJTQIFOPNFOPOBOECJSETQFDJFTEFDMJOF MJTUFEɨJTBQQSPBDIJTJNQPSUBOU FTQFDJBMMZTJODFNBOZ #MBDLCVSO *OUSPEVDFEDBUBOESBUTQFDJFTUPQUIF DPOTFSWBUJPOFêPSUTBSFSFBDUJWF USZJOHUPCSJOHTQFDJFTCBDL MJTUPGEFUSJNFOUBMJOUSPEVDFEQSFEBUPST BOEUIFTFQSFEBUPS GSPNUIFCSJOLPGFYUJODUJPOPSNFSFMZXPSLJOHUPTMPXEPXO QPQVMBUJPOTJODSFBTFUIFFYUFOUPGTQFDJFTEFDMJOF/PO IBCJUBUMPTT NBNNBMJBOQSFEBUPSTIBWFIBEBEFTUSVDUJWFFêFDUPOBOJNBM 3FXJMEJOHJTBOPUIFSQSPBDUJWFDPOTFSWBUJPOJEFB*UIBT QPQVMBUJPOTBTXFMMɨFJOUSPEVDUJPOPGUIFCSPXOUSFFTOBLF CFFOIZQPUIFTJ[FEBOEBSHVFEBUMFOHUIXIFUIFSPSOPUIVNBOT Boiga irregularis) JTBTUSJLJOHFYBNQMFPGUIJTɨFBSSJWBMPG XFSFSFTQPOTJCMFGPSUIFFYUJODUJPOPGNFHBGBVOBJO&VSPQF 26 - HOHONU Volume 8 2010 "VTUSBMJB UIF"NFSJDBT BOEPODPOUJOFOUBMJTMBOET*OUIJT BTXFMMBTBEBQUJWFWBSJBUJPOBSFJNQPSUBOUUPNBJOUFOBODFPG POHPJOHEFCBUF UIFSFBQQFBSTUPCFBDPSSFMBUJPOCFUXFFOUIF QPQVMBUJPOTUIFSFGPSFJUJTOFDFTTBSZUPVOEFSTUBOECPUI BSSJWBMPGIVNBOTBOEUIFEJTBQQFBSBODFPGMBSHFBOJNBMTBT /FVUSBMMPDJPSHFOFTBSFUIPTFUIBUEPOPUBêFDUBO IVNBOTEJTQFSTFEUISPVHIPVUUIF"NFSJDBTBQQSPYJNBUFMZ PSHBOJTNTMFWFMPGëUOFTT PSBCJMJUZUPBEBQUUPJUTDIBOHJOH ZFBSTBHP 7FSOPO FOWJSPONFOUɨFTFOFVUSBMHFOPUZQFTBSFOPUFYQSFTTFEBT ɨFTFMBSHFDBSOJWPSFTBOEIFSCJWPSFTQMBZFEJNQPSUBOU QIFOPUZQFTUIBUBSFTVCKFDUTFMFDUJWFQSFTTVSFT UIFSFGPSFUIFTF SPMFTJOUIFQSJTUJOFFDPTZTUFNTXFSFPODFQSFTFOUJO DIBSBDUFSTBSFDPOTJEFSFETFMFDUJWFMZOFVUSBM/FVUSBMHFOFUJD /PSUI"NFSJDBBOECFZPOE*OBEEJUJPOUPCFJOHSFBDUJWF NBSLFSTEPOPUPêFSJOTJHIUJOUPUIFiBEBQUJWFPSFWPMVUJPOBSZ DPOTFSWBUJPOFêPSUTBSFPGUFOMJNJUFECZBTNBMMUFNQPSBM QPUFOUJBMPGQPQVMBUJPOTPSTQFDJFTw )PMEFSFHHFS ,BNN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land-Use, Land-Cover Changes and Biodiversity Loss - Helena Freitas
    LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES – Vol. I - Land-Use, Land-Cover Changes and Biodiversity Loss - Helena Freitas LAND-USE, LAND-COVER CHANGES AND BIODIVERSITY LOSS Helena Freitas University of Coimbra, Portugal Keywords: land use; habitat fragmentation; biodiversity loss Contents 1. Introduction 2. Primary Causes of Biodiversity Loss 2.1. Habitat Degradation and Destruction 2.2. Habitat Fragmentation 2.3. Global Climate Change 3. Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation 3.1. General 3.2. The European Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 4. Conclusions Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary During Earth's history, species extinction has probably been caused by modifications of the physical environment after impacts such as meteorites or volcanic activity. On the contrary, the actual extinction of species is mainly a result of human activities, namely any form of land use that causes the conversion of vast areas to settlement, agriculture, and forestry, resulting in habitat destruction, degradation, and fragmentation, which are among the most important causes of species decline and extinction. The loss of biodiversity is unique among the major anthropogenic changes because it is irreversible. The importance of preserving biodiversity has increased in recent times. The global recognition of the alarming loss of biodiversity and the acceptance of its value resultedUNESCO in the Convention on Biologi – calEOLSS Diversity. In addition, in Europe, the challenge is also the implementation of the European strategy for biodiversity conservation and agricultural policies, though it is increasingly recognized that the strategy is limitedSAMPLE by a lack of basic ecological CHAPTERS information and indicators available to decision makers and end users. We have reached a point where we can save biodiversity only by saving the biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Biodiversity Change After Deforestation
    Rev. Cient. Cien. Nat. Ambien. 11(1):28-36 Gilbert • Dinámica de cambios de diversidad después Junio 2017 ISSN: 1390-8413 de deforestación Dynamics of biodiversity change after deforestation Dinámica de cambios de diversidad después de deforestación Guillermo Javier Gilbert-Jaramillo Postgraduate student. Imperial College London. London, SW7 2AZ, UK. Tel: +44(0)207589511 Recibido 5 de mayo 2017; recibido en forma revisada 26 de mayo 2017, aceptado 5 de junio 2017 Disponible en línea 26 de junio 2017 Abstract The many changes that forests have suffered over the last century have led to biodiversity loss around the planet. In order to understand these processes and try to predict future biological diversity loss, spatial comparisons have commonly been used. This research uses spatial and temporal data aiming to understand better the dynamics of these changes caused by deforestation. A meta-Analysis was conducted compiling information from 13 studies using before-after-control- impact design (BACI) to examine abundance response to deforestation. The results show clearly that biodiversity tends to decline in the five years after forest loss, though losses are not significant within the first two years. It was also found that the effects of deforestation on species abundance varied significantly among taxonomic groups, physical level species occupy in the ecosystem, type of disturbance, type of perturbation, and constancy in the surveys. The outcome of this research agrees with results of studies with spatial comparisons, though it is not yet possible to conclude which is best to predict biodiversity changes. However, these findings deepen our understanding of the complexity of biodiversity change and deforestation and emphasize importance of generating more studies that include temporal data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Extinction in Evolution DAVID M
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 6758-6763, July 1994 Colloquium Paper Ths paper was presented at a colloquium entled "Tempo and Mode in Evolution" organized by Walter M. Fitch and Francisco J. Ayala, held January 27-29, 1994, by the National Academy of Sciences, in Irvine, CA. The role of extinction in evolution DAVID M. RAuP Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 ABSTRACT The extinction of species is not normally must remember what has already been said on the probable consideed an important element of neodarwinian theory, in wide intervals of time between our consecutive formations; contrast to the opposite phenomenon, specatlon. This is sur- and in these intervals there may have been much slower prising in view of the special importance Darwin attced to extermination. (pp. 321-322) extinction, and because the number ofspecies extinctions in the Like his geologist colleague Charles Lyell, Darwin was history oflife is almost the same as the number oforiginations; contemptuous ofthose who thought extinctions were caused present-day biodiversity Is the result of a trivial surplus of by great catastrophes. cumulated over millions of years. For an evolu- tions, ... so profound is our ignorance, and so high our presump- tionary biologist to ignore extinction is probably as foolhardy tion, that we marvel when we hear of the extinction of an as for a demographer to ignore mortality. The past decade has organic being; and as we do not see the cause, we invoke seen a resurgence of interest in extinction, yet research on the cataclysms to desolate the world, or invent laws on the topic Is stifl at a reconnaissance level, and our present under- duration of the forms of life! (p.
    [Show full text]
  • One Million Species Face Extinction
    IN FOCUS NEWS But the excitement around cancer immuno therapies — two researchers won a Nobel prize last year for pioneering them — has been tempered after several partici- pants in US clinical trials died from side effects. Regulators around the world have moved slowly to approve the treatments for sale. The US Food and Drug Admin- istration has approved only three cancer immunotherapies so far, and the Chinese drug regulator has approved none. THE OCEAN AGENCY/XL CATLIN SEAVIEW SURVEY SEAVIEW CATLIN THE OCEAN AGENCY/XL Before 2016, Chinese regulations for the sale of cell therapies were ambiguous, and many hospitals sold the treatments to patients while safety and efficacy testing was still under way. Ren Jun, an oncolo- gist at the Beijing Shijitan Hospital Cancer Center, estimates that roughly one million people paid for such procedures. But the market came under scrutiny when it was revealed that a university student with Habitats such as coral reefs have been hit hard by pollution and climate change. a rare cancer had paid more than 200,000 yuan (US$30,000) for an experimental BIODIVERSITY immunotherapy, after seeing it promoted by a hospital on the Internet. The treatment was unsuccessful, and the student later died. The government cracked down on hospi- One million species tals selling cell therapies — although clinical trials in which participants do not pay for treatment were allowed to continue. face extinction GATHERING EVIDENCE Under the proposed regulations, roughly Landmark United Nations report finds that human activities 1,400 elite hospitals that conduct medical threaten ecosystems around the world. research, known as Grade 3A hospitals, would be able to apply for a licence to sell cell therapies, after proving that they BY JEFF TOLLEFSON in Paris to finalize and approve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Catastrophic Risks Survey
    GLOBAL CATASTROPHIC RISKS SURVEY (2008) Technical Report 2008/1 Published by Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University Anders Sandberg and Nick Bostrom At the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference in Oxford (17‐20 July, 2008) an informal survey was circulated among participants, asking them to make their best guess at the chance that there will be disasters of different types before 2100. This report summarizes the main results. The median extinction risk estimates were: Risk At least 1 million At least 1 billion Human extinction dead dead Number killed by 25% 10% 5% molecular nanotech weapons. Total killed by 10% 5% 5% superintelligent AI. Total killed in all 98% 30% 4% wars (including civil wars). Number killed in 30% 10% 2% the single biggest engineered pandemic. Total killed in all 30% 10% 1% nuclear wars. Number killed in 5% 1% 0.5% the single biggest nanotech accident. Number killed in 60% 5% 0.05% the single biggest natural pandemic. Total killed in all 15% 1% 0.03% acts of nuclear terrorism. Overall risk of n/a n/a 19% extinction prior to 2100 These results should be taken with a grain of salt. Non‐responses have been omitted, although some might represent a statement of zero probability rather than no opinion. 1 There are likely to be many cognitive biases that affect the result, such as unpacking bias and the availability heuristic‒‐well as old‐fashioned optimism and pessimism. In appendix A the results are plotted with individual response distributions visible. Other Risks The list of risks was not intended to be inclusive of all the biggest risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Tolerance to Humans Is Predicted by Body Mass: Evidence from Long
    1 Title: Mammalian tolerance to humans is predicted by body mass: evidence from long- 2 term archives 3 4 Running Head: Body mass predicts mammalian decline 5 6 Jennifer J. Crees1,2* 7 8 Samuel T. Turvey1 9 10 Robin Freeman1 11 12 Chris Carbone1 13 14 1Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK 15 2Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 16 5BD, UK 17 18 *Email: [email protected] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 26 Abstract 27 Humans are implicated as a major driver of species extinctions from the Late Pleistocene to 28 the present. However, our predictive understanding of human-caused extinction remains poor 29 due to the restricted temporal and spatial scales at which this process is typically assessed, 30 and the risks of bias due to “extinction filters” resulting from a poor understanding of past 31 species declines. We develop a novel continent-wide dataset containing country-level last- 32 occurrence records for 30 European terrestrial mammals across the Holocene (c.11,500 years 33 to present), an epoch of relative climatic stability that captures major transitions in human 34 demography. We analyze regional extirpations against a high-resolution database of human 35 population density (HPD) estimates to identify species-specific tolerances to changing HPD 36 through the Holocene. Mammalian thresholds to HPD scale strongly with body mass, with 37 larger-bodied mammals experiencing regional population losses at lower HPDs than smaller- 38 bodied mammals. Our analysis enables us to identify levels of tolerance to HPD for different 39 species, and therefore has wide applicability for determining biotic vulnerability to human 40 impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Millennial-Scale Faunal Record Reveals Differential Resilience of European
    View metadata, citation and similar papersDownloaded at core.ac.uk from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on August 11, 2016 brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Millennial-scale faunal record reveals rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org differential resilience of European large mammals to human impacts across the Holocene Research Jennifer J. Crees1, Chris Carbone1, Robert S. Sommer2, Norbert Benecke3 Cite this article: Crees JJ, Carbone C, Sommer and Samuel T. Turvey1 RS, Benecke N, Turvey ST. 2016 Millennial-scale faunal record reveals differential resilience of 1Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4RY, UK European large mammals to human impacts 2Department of Landscape Ecology, Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, University of Kiel, across the Holocene. Proc. R. Soc. B 283: Olshausenstrasse 75, 24118 Kiel, Germany 3Department of Natural Sciences, German Archaeological Institute, Im Dol 2-6, Berlin 14195, Germany 20152152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2152 The use of short-term indicators for understanding patterns and processes of biodiversity loss can mask longer-term faunal responses to human pressures. We use an extensive database of approximately 18 700 mammalian zooarchaeo- logical records for the last 11 700 years across Europe to reconstruct spatio- Received: 7 September 2015 temporal dynamics of Holocene range change for 15 large-bodied mammal Accepted: 26 February 2016 species. European mammals experienced protracted, non-congruent range losses, with significant declines starting in some species approximately 3000 years ago and continuing to the present, and with the timing, duration and mag- nitude of declines varying individually between species. Some European mammals became globally extinct during the Holocene, whereas others experi- Subject Areas: enced limited or no significant range change.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Biodiversity Change Across Scales During the Anthropocene Mark Vellend, Lander Baeten, Antoine Becker-Scarpitta, V´Eronique Boucher-Lalonde, Jenny L
    PP68CH21-Vellend ARI 6 April 2017 9:54 ANNUAL REVIEWS Further Click here to view this article's online features: • Download figures as PPT slides • Navigate linked references Plant Biodiversity Change • Download citations • Explore related articles • Search keywords Across Scales During the Anthropocene Mark Vellend,1 Lander Baeten,2 Antoine Becker-Scarpitta,1 Veronique´ Boucher-Lalonde,1 Jenny L. McCune,3 Julie Messier,1 Isla H. Myers-Smith,4 and Dov F. Sax5 1Departement´ de Biologie, Universite´ de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec´ J1K 2R1, Canada; email: [email protected] 2Forest and Nature Lab, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University, BE-9090 Melle-Gontrode, Belgium 3Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada 4School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, United Kingdom 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017. 68:563–86 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on biodiversity, climate change, habitat fragmentation, land use, nitrogen January 11, 2017 deposition, scale The Annual Review of Plant Biology is online at plant.annualreviews.org Abstract https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916- Plant communities have undergone dramatic changes in recent centuries, 040949 Access provided by Brown University on 05/04/17. For personal use only. although not all such changes fit with the dominant biodiversity-crisis nar- Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017.68:563-586. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org rative used to describe them. At the global scale, future declines in plant All rights reserved species diversity are highly likely given habitat conversion in the tropics, although few extinctions have been documented for the Anthropocene to date (<0.1%).
    [Show full text]
  • Reversing Biodiversity Loss – the Case for Urgent Action This Statement Has Been Created by the Science Academies of the Group of Seven (G7) Nations
    31 MARCH 2021 Reversing biodiversity loss – the case for urgent action This statement has been created by the Science Academies of the Group of Seven (G7) nations. It represents the Academies’ view on the magnitude of biodiversity decline and the urgent action required to halt and reverse this trend. The Academies call on G7 nations to work collaboratively to integrate the multiple values of biodiversity into decision-making, and to pursue cross-sectoral solutions that address the biodiversity, climate and other linked crises in a coordinated manner. At its simplest, biodiversity describes life on Earth – the • Despite clear and growing evidence, and despite ambitious different genes, species and ecosystems that comprise the global targets, our responses to biodiversity decline at the biosphere and the varying habitats, landscapes and regions global and national levels have been woefully insufficient. in which they exist. The 2020 Global Biodiversity Outlook3 reported that none of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, set out in the Strategic Plan Biodiversity matters. for Biodiversity 2011 – 2020, had been fully achieved. Since the ratification of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity • Humans emerged within the biosphere and are both (UN CBD) in 1992, more than a quarter of the tropical forests inseparable from it and fully dependent on it. Biodiversity that were standing then have been cut down. has its own intrinsic value distinct from the value it provides to human life. For all species, it provides food, But there is hope for a better way forward. water shelter and the functioning of the whole Earth system. For humans, it is also an integral part of spiritual, • To halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030, nothing cultural, psychological and artistic wellbeing1.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising the Anthropocene: Ecological Degradation in Italian Twenty-First Century Literary Writing
    Characterising the Anthropocene: Ecological Degradation in Italian Twenty-First Century Literary Writing by Alessandro Macilenti A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Italian Literature. Victoria University of Wellington 2015 Abstract The twenty-first century has witnessed the exacerbation of ecological issues that began to manifest themselves in the mid-twentieth century. It has become increasingly clear that the current environmental crisis poses an unprecedented existential threat to civilization as well as to Homo sapiens itself. Whereas the physical and social sciences have been defining the now inevitable transition to a different (and more inhospitable) Earth, the humanities have yet to assert their role as a transformative force within the context of global environmental change. Turning abstract issues into narrative form, literary writing can increase awareness of environmental issues as well as have a deep emotive influence on its readership. To showcase this type of writing as well as the methodological frameworks that best highlights the social and ethical relevance of such texts alongside their literary value, I have selected the following twenty-first century Italian literary works: Roberto Saviano’s Gomorra, Kai Zen’s Delta blues, Wu Ming’s Previsioni del tempo, Simona Vinci’s Rovina, Giancarlo di Cataldo’s Fuoco!, Laura Pugno’s Sirene, and Alessandra Montrucchio’s E poi la sete, all published between 2006 and 2011. The main goal of this study is to demonstrate how these works offer an invaluable opportunity to communicate meaningfully and accessibly the discomforting truths of global environmental change, including ecomafia, waste trafficking, illegal building, arson, ozone depletion, global warming and the dysfunctional relationship between humanity and the biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Record – Timing of Events and Extinction
    Biology 1B—Evolution Lecture 11, Insights from the Fossil Record – timing of events and extinction Fossil Record (speciation) Microevolution Macroevolution The fossil record is our primary source of information on the past, including the timing of various extinction and evolutionary events and the phenotypes of ancestral forms. Sedimentary rocks created by erosion (often in a marine environment) form strata, with different layers corresponding to different time periods. Consider the Grand Canyon, formed by the Colorado River over 20 million years: the exposed strata, from the top of nearby Bryce Canyon to the bottom of the Grand Canyon itself, cover the last billion years. These layers can be dated by analyzing proportions of different isotopes present in each of the strata. Fossils provided both key evidence and frustration to Darwin when writing the Origin of the Species. Fossils showed there were many creatures which no longer existed; but these animals existed at some point, and must have been adapted to the environment in which they lived. This further reinforced the idea that the present and past are ruled by the same physical processes. However, it was frustrating in that many complex creatures seemed to suddenly appear in the fossil record, without preceding transitional forms. Darwin predicted that these gaps would be filled, and many of the gaps he predicted have now been filled. Some major transitions in earth history Billions of Years Ago Earth and Solar System formation 4.5 Earliest prokaryote fossils 3.5 Increase in oxygen – implies photosynthesis 2.7 Single-celled fossil eukaryotes 2.1-1.2 Complex metazoan (multi-celled animals) 0.5 Hominids (apes and humans) 0.005 The Cambrian Explosion is a time period from 550 million years ago (appearance of complex metazoans) when many species and new body forms appear in the fossil record.
    [Show full text]
  • Fueling Extinction: How Dirty Energy Drives Wildlife to the Brink
    Fueling Extinction: How Dirty Energy Drives Wildlife to the Brink The Top Ten U.S. Species Threatened by Fossil Fuels Introduction s Americans, we are living off of energy sources produced That hasn’t stopped oil and gas companies from gobbling in the age of the dinosaurs. Fossil fuels are dirty. They’re up permits and leases for millions of acres of our pristine Adangerous. And, they’ve taken an incredible toll on our public land, which provides important wildlife habitat and country in many ways. supplies safe drinking water to millions of Americans. And the industry is demanding ever more leases, even though it is Our nation’s threatened and endangered wildlife, plants, birds sitting on thousands of leases it isn’t using—an area the size of and fish are among those that suffer from the impacts of our Pennsylvania. fossil fuel addiction in the United States. This report highlights ten species that are particularly vulnerable to the pursuit Oil companies have generated billions of dollars in profits, and of oil, gas and coal. Our outsized reliance on fossil fuels and paid their senior executives $220 million in 2010 alone. Yet the impacts that result from its development, storage and ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP combined have reduced transportation is making it ever more difficult to keep our vow to their U.S. workforce by 11,200 employees since 2005. protect America’s wildlife. The American people are clearly getting the short end of the For example, the Arctic Ocean is home to some of our most stick from the fossil fuel industry, both in terms of jobs and in beloved wildlife—polar bears, whales, and seals.
    [Show full text]