On Determination of Market Price of One Ordinary Registered Share of the Moscow Exchange (State Registration Number 1-05-8443-H Dated 16.11.2011)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Determination of Market Price of One Ordinary Registered Share of the Moscow Exchange (State Registration Number 1-05-8443-H Dated 16.11.2011) 2, 3-ya ulitsa Yamskogo Polya, bld. 7, office 301, Moscow, 125040 Tel.: +7 (495) 717-01-01 +7 (495) 557-07-97 www.evcons.ru REPORT No. 134/16 dated June 29, 2016 On determination of market price of one ordinary registered share of the Moscow Exchange (state registration number 1-05-8443-H dated 16.11.2011) Customer: Moscow Exchange Contractor: Everest Consulting Moscow 2016 EVEREST Consulting LLC 1 Att: Evgeny Fetisov CFO Moscow Exchange Dear Evgeny, Under Agreement No.134/16 dated 16.06.2016 executed by and between Everest Consulting Limited Liability Company (hereinafter Everest Consulting LLC, the Contractor), and Public Joint-Stock Company Moscow Exchange MICEX-RTS (hereinafter the Moscow Exchange, the Customer), the appraiser employed by the Contractor (hereinafter the Appraiser) carried out valuation of one registered ordinary share of the Moscow Exchange (hereinafter the Object of Valuation). The principle task and intended use of valuation was to measure the market price of the Object of Valuation for the purpose of share buyback from shareholders who voted against the corporate restructuring or failed to participate in voting in pursuance with clause 1 and clause 3 Article 75 of the Federal Law No.208-FZ On Joint-stock Companies dated 26 December 1995. The valuation was done in accordance with the Federal Law No.135-FZ On Valuation Activity in the Russian Federation dated 29 July 1998, Federal Evaluation Standard General Concepts of the Valuation, Approaches and Requirements to Carrying Out the Valuation (FES No.1) approved by the Order of the Ministry of Economy No. 297 dated 20 May 2015; Federal Evaluation Standard Purpose of the Assessment and Cost Types (FES No.2) approved by the Order of the Ministry of Economy No. 299 dated 20 May 2015; Federal Evaluation Standard Requirements to the Valuation Report (FES No.3) approved by the Order of the Ministry of Economy No. 299 dated 20 May 2015; and Federal Evaluation Standard Business Valuation (FES No.8) approved by the Order of the Ministry of Economy No. 326 dated 1 June 2015. The Report presents description of the Object of Valuation, facts obtained by the Appraiser, analysis milestones description, findings substantiation, as well as assumptions and limitations applied to calculation of the Object of Valuation price and deliverables applicability scope. The Appraiser was not tasked with, and thus bears no responsibility for the Object of Valuation legal status description, as well as issues that imply legal aspect discussion regarding Object of Valuation ownership. Calculations made, assumption and limitations applied, as well as price calculations are presented in the relevant sections of the Report. The Report shall be interpreted only in its entirety and with all assumptions and limitations applied. Based on calculations made and findings analysed, it is found that the market price of one registered ordinary share of the Moscow Exchange (issue registration number 1-05-08443- Н, issue date 16 September, 2011) as of 1 June 2016 equals RUB 106 (one hundred and six 00/100). Our opinion above is based on calculations, opinions and other insights drawn from the market research, Appraiser’s personal experience and expertise, and also from business meetings. Information sources and calculation method are disclosed in the relevant section of the Report. If you have any further questions regarding valuation or our opinion, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely yours, A.V. Zhuravlev Director General, Everest Consulting LLC 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... ОШИБКА! ЗАКЛАДКА НЕ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНА. 1.1. Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................................................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 1.2. Evaluation Standards Applied ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Assumptions Made in Object Evaluation ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4. Information about the Evaluation Customer and the Appraiser ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5. Information about All Organizations and Specialists Involved in Evaluation and Preparation of Evaluation Report ................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 1.6. Basic Facts and Key Findings ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.7. Definition of the Terms Used .................................................................................................................................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE OBJECT OF EVALUATION ....................................................................................... ОШИБКА! ЗАКЛАДКА НЕ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНА. 3. ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY’S FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES ........................................................... ОШИБКА! ЗАКЛАДКА НЕ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНА. 3.1. Summary of Results ............................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.2. Results of 2015 and Plans for 2016 by Segments ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.1. Stock Market ................................................................................................................................................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.2.2. Futures and Options Market and SDFIs (Standardized Derivative Financial Instruments) .................................................................................................................... 42 3.2.3. Exchange Market .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 3.2.4. Currency Market ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 3.2.5. Commodity Market ....................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.3. Posttrading Services .............................................................................................................................................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.3.1. Clearing Activities .......................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.3.2. Activities of the National Settlement Depository .................................................................................................................................................................................. 50 3.4. Information Products ............................................................................................................................................................................. Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.4.1. Indices ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.4.2. Analytical Products ........................................................................................................................................................................ Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.4.3. Securities Database ....................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.5. Customer Service ................................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.5.1. Market Access ............................................................................................................................................................................... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. 3.5.2. Information Technology ...............................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Weak-Form Market Efficiency, Estimation Interval and the Nigerian Stock Exchange: Empirical Evidence
    WEAK-FORM MARKET EFFICIENCY, ESTIMATION INTERVAL AND THE NIGERIAN STOCK EXCHANGE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE Onyemachi Maxwell Ogbulu, Abia State University Abstract Given the desirability of efficient capital markets in aiding optimal resource mobilization and allocation in the financial system, this paper is an attempt to investigate the efficiency level of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) across different data estimation intervals with reference to the weak-form variant of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The paper employed daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly aggregate stock price data using the NSE All Share Index series from 4th January, 1999 to 31st December, 2013 to test for the weak-form efficiency of the NSE using a combination of seven (7) statistical and parametric tools namely- Autocorrelation tests, the ADF and P-P unit root tests, Variance Ratio tests, the Normality/Random Walk tests, the Granger Causality test, the ARCH-GARCH test and Regression rest. The empirical results of the investigation indicate that on balance the NSE is weak-form inefficient when daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly prices are examined irrespective of the estimation interval and the parametric test employed in the tests. It is to be noted from the findings that the NSE is still weak-form inefficient despite the implementation of various capital market reforms undertaken in the recent past as well as the adoption of automation and ICT in the operations of the Exchange. It is therefore recommended that these salutary reforms and policies should be intensified and sustained to ensure efficiency of the NSE. Keywords: Weak-form efficiency, Efficient Market Hypothesis, Estimation Interval, Parametric Tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Execution Venues List
    Execution Venues List This list should be read in conjunction with the Best Execution policy for Credit Suisse AG (excluding branches and subsidiaries), Credit Suisse (Switzerland) Ltd, Credit Suisse (Luxembourg) S.A, Credit Suisse (Luxembourg) S.A. Zweigniederlassung Österreichand, Neue Aargauer Bank AG published at www.credit-suisse.com/MiFID and https://www.credit-suisse.com/lu/en/private-banking/best-execution.html The Execution Venues1) shown enable the in scope legal entities to obtain on a consistent basis the best possible result for the execution of client orders. Accordingly, where the in scope legal entities may place significant reliance on these Execution Venues. Equity Cash & Exchange Traded Funds Country/Liquidity Pool Execution Venue1) Name MIC Code2) Regulated Markets & 3rd party exchanges Europe Austria Wiener Börse – Official Market WBAH Austria Wiener Börse – Securities Exchange XVIE Austria Wiener Börse XWBO Austria Wiener Börse Dritter Markt WBDM Belgium Euronext Brussels XBRU Belgium Euronext Growth Brussels ALXB Czech Republic Prague Stock Exchange XPRA Cyprus Cyprus Stock Exchange XCYS Denmark NASDAQ Copenhagen XCSE Estonia NASDAQ Tallinn XTAL Finland NASDAQ Helsinki XHEL France EURONEXT Paris XPAR France EURONEXT Growth Paris ALXP Germany Börse Berlin XBER Germany Börse Berlin – Equiduct Trading XEQT Germany Deutsche Börse XFRA Germany Börse Frankfurt Warrants XSCO Germany Börse Hamburg XHAM Germany Börse Düsseldorf XDUS Germany Börse München XMUN Germany Börse Stuttgart XSTU Germany Hannover Stock Exchange XHAN
    [Show full text]
  • Clarifying and Settling Access to Clearing and Settlement in the Eu
    CLARIFYING AND SETTLING ACCESS TO CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT IN THE EU Working Paper www.ieje.net David Henry Research Fellow Institute for European Legal Studies, University of Liège, Belgium [email protected] Institut d’Etudes Juridiques Européennes, Bd. du Rectorat 3, Bat. B33 / Bte 9, B-1400 Liège, Tel +32 4 366 3130, Fax +32 4 366 3155 1 CLARIFYING AND SETTLING ACCESS TO CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT IN THE EU David Henry* I. Introduction As has been the case in network industries such as telecommunications,1 electricity,2 gas,3 and the postal sector,4 the European Union (hereinafter, the “EU”) financial services sector is slowly being prised open and feeling the effects of liberalisation.5 Indeed, a single market in financial services is seen as a fundamental requirement to achieving the, now diluted, goal of transforming the EU into the “most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy in the world” by 2010. Though a single financial services market currently remains virtual, the launching of the Financial Services Action Plan (hereinafter the “FSAP”) in 1999 has brought considerable progress in this field.6 The FSAP lays down indicative priorities and a timetable for * Research Fellow at the Institute for European Legal Studies, University of Liège, Belgium. My sincerest thanks go to Mark Griffiths of Clifford Chance LLP and Nicolas Petit of the University of Liège for their helpful comments. 1 See, in particular, Directive 96/19 of 13 March 1996 amending Directive 90/388 with regard to the implementation of full competition in telecommunications markets, (1996) O.J. L 74/13.
    [Show full text]
  • Outstanding Shares
    PJSC RusHydro | Annual Report 2018 Share of securities in free float1 Shareholder agreements Date Free-float factor RusHydro’s shareholders can enter into Last trading day of 2016 0.23 shareholder agreements, including Last trading day of 2017 0.25 those that afford them an extent of Last trading day of 2018 0.19 control disproportionate to their contribution to the authorized capital2. Notifications on concluded shareholder agreements received by RusHydro Parties to the shareholder agreement Date of the shareholder agreement ↗ The Russian Federation as represented by the Federal Agency for State Property Management March 7, 2017 ↗ VTB Bank (PJSC) ↗ The Russian Federation as represented by the Federal Agency for State Property Management June 23, 2016 ↗ RusHydro’s subsidiaries: Hydroinvest3, EZOP, Energy Index – HydroOGK Outstanding shares Moscow Exchange listing Index inclusion: ↗ FTSE All-World Index AWORLDS; ↗ MOEX Russia Index (previous name – ↗ FTSE4Good Emerging; The Company’s shares have been MICEX Index) IMOEX; ↗ NASDAQ Russia NQRU; traded on the Moscow Exchange ↗ Electric Utilities Index MOEXEU; ↗ Nasdaq AlphaDEX Emerging Markets (formerly MICEX Stock Exchange). ↗ Broad Market Index MOEXBMI; NQDXEM; since February 4, 2008 (ticker: HYDR). ↗ State-Owned Companies Index ↗ STOXX Russia Total Market TCRUP; The securities are listed in Level 1, MOEXSCI; ↗ STOXX Optimized Russia EEORGT. the Exchange’s top quotation list. ↗ FTSE Emerging Index AWALLE; Moscow Exchange trading information Item 2016 2017 2018 Trading mode T+: stocks and DRs T+: stocks and DRs T+: stocks and DRs Currency RUB RUB RUB Maximum trade price 0.994 1.100 0.810 Minimum trade price 0.575 0.717 0.476 Year-end trade price 0.926 0.729 0.486 Trading volume, bn pcs 134 173 136 1 In accordance with the Moscow Exchange’s methodology for calculating the free-float factor published at http://www.moex.com/ru/index/MICEXINDEXCF/constituents/.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft.Projectnotice to Street Nov 25 2019.V2
    DR Market Announcement December 29, 2020 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 500 Stanton Christiana Rd. Newark, DE 19713-2107 To: FINRA Security Name: KONAMI HOLDINGS CORPORATION – Termination of Deposit Agreement JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary under the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of April 16, 2015 (the "Deposit Agreement") among KONAMI HOLDINGS CORPORATION (the "Company"), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary thereunder (the "Depositary"), and all Holders (defined therein) and Beneficial Owners (defined therein) from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder evidencing American depositary shares ("ADSs") hereby notifies registered holders of ADRs ("Holders") that the termination provisions of the Deposit Agreement have been amended and the Company has instructed the Depositary to terminate the Deposit Agreement (as amended) effective January 29, 2021. ADR Termination Date: January 29, 2021 Ratio: 1 ADS: 1 Share of Common Stock CUSIP: 50046R101 ADR ISIN: US50046R1014 Underlying ISIN: JP3300200007 Country of Incorporation: Japan Custodian: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Please be advised the ADR issuance books for the Company are closed with immediate effect. The ADS cancellation books will remain open until the earlier of (a) February 26, 2021, if prior to March 01, 2021 the Depositary establishes an unsponsored American depositary receipt program in respect of the Company’s shares; (b) March 30, 2021, if prior to March 01, 2021, the Depositary does not establish an unsponsored American
    [Show full text]
  • Shareholder Identification and Registration
    Shareholder Identification and Registration Report by a Working Group mandated by the European Post Trade Group December 2015 1 1. Introduction 1.1 European Post Trade Group / EPTG Tasks and Composition The European Post Trade Group (EPTG) has been set up in 2012 on the recommendation of the European Group on Market Infrastructure. It is a joint initiative between the European Commission, the ECB, ESMA and the industry. Its members are representatives of the key players involved in post trade issues which participate in the group’s work as experts. The initiators intended to drive the dismantling of barriers to cross border safety and efficiency including identifying new issues that have developed since the second Giovannini report in 2003. The mandate also comprises encouragement to propose to compliment the legal framework in those areas as well as the work of the ECB on its Target Securities project. 1 The EPTG has set up an action list and several initiatives have been commenced. 2 1.2 EPTG Working Group Shareholder Identification and Registration Tasks and Composition During the discussions in meetings of the EPTG several issues have been identified to warrant further attention including shareholder identification and questions of “registration” procedures and the relation to settlement. Two sponsors have been designated and a Working Group has been set up.3 This Working Group was set the task to do a fact-finding exercise with respect to the two issues to identify the concerns and expectations of market participants to develop a pan- European model for both in order to propose procedures not to interrupt straight through processing (STP) in cross border exercising of shareholders rights and cross border settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Restricting Corporate Takeovers
    3 Werner Hermann and C. J. Santoni Werner Hermann, an economist at the Swiss National Bank, was a visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. G. J. Santoni is a protessor of economics at Ball State University Santoni’s research was supported by the George A. and Frances Ball Foundation. Scott Leitz provided research assistance. The Cost 01 Restricting Cor- porate Takeovers: A Lesson From Switzerland of takeovers is important to maintaining an effi- 1~’IANYPEOPLE in management, labor, 4 banking and Congress are alarmed about the re- cient corporate sector. cent increase in corporate takeovers. ‘These peo- A recent change in Swiss commercial practice ple believe that the risk of a takeover is detrimental to the efficient management of cor- provides important new evidence about the con- porations and not in the long-run interests of sequences of restricting corporate takeovers. the owners (see shaded insert on following ‘The Swiss Commercial Code in the past has page). As a result, they have advanced various allowed corporations to build effective barrier’s proposals to restrict corporate takeovers.’ against takeovers. Many Swiss firms have taken advantage of this legal provision to protect Others have a different view of takeovers, themselves against foreign raiders. On Nov- believing that restrictions of takeover activity ember 17, 1988, Nestle’ (by far the largest Swiss will be harmful to shareholders’ wealth. They corporation) announced that it would allow argue that takeover activity is a simple manifest- foreign investors to buy a type of share that ation of competition in the market for corporate only Swiss citizens could hold until then.
    [Show full text]
  • Share Listing
    Annual Report 2018 | MAGNIT MAGNIT TODAY 3-11 99 STRATEGIC REPORT 13-27 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 29-53 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 55-113 APPENDICES 115-189 Structure of share capital1 Name Number of registered entities Proportion of authorized capital, % National Settlement Depositary 1 95.54 Including: PJSC VTB Bank 18.342 LLC VTB Infrastructure Investments 7.723 Legal entities and individuals 24 4.46 Total: 25 100 Share listing Listing of shares on the Moscow Exchange The Company’s shares have been listed on the Moscow Stock Exchange since April 24, 2006 (MGNT ticker) and are included in the first quotation list. The shares are included in the following indices: Stock Subindex, MOEX Index, MOEX Index 10, Blue Chip Index, Broad Market Index, Consumer Sector Index / Consumer Sector Index, RTS Consumer Sector Index, RTS Index, and Broad Market RTS Index, among others. 1. Shareholding structure is provided in accordance with the list of shareholders registered in the register of PJSC “Magnit” shareholders as of 31.12.2018 2. Information is provided as of 12.11.2018 based on the list of shareholders entitled to participate in the general shareholders meeting of PJSC “Magnit 3. Information is provided as of 12.11.2018 based on the list of shareholders entitled to participate in the general shareholders meeting of PJSC “Magnit 100 101 Weight of shares in indices Ticker Index name Weight in index, % RDXUSD Russian Depositary Index USD 2.85 RDX Russian Depositary Index EUR 2.85 NU137529 MSCI EM IMI (VRS Taxes) Net Return USD Index 0.09 RIOB FTSE Russia IOB
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Shareholders 2009 | Zurich Financial
    Zurich Financial Services Group Annual Report 2009 Letter to Shareholders 2009 Zurich’s 2009 results reflect our continued ability to execute against a proven strategy rooted in operational excellence and financial discipline. Dr. Manfred Gentz Martin Senn Chairman of the Board of Directors Chief Executive Officer Letter to Shareholders Zurich Financial Services Group Annual Report 2009 We are proud to present to you a strong set of 2009 channels. In addition, the new business margin exceeded operating results. Our business operating profit 2 percent, illustrating the value of the significant improved by 8 percent to USD 5.6 billion, and our structural change we are making in our life business. net income increased by 6 percent to USD 3.2 billion. Furthermore, we ended 2009 with one of our Similarly, Farmers continued to post greater profitability strongest balance sheets ever, and a 17.2 percent and strong growth. Business operating profit improved business operating profit after tax return on equity by a solid 0 percent, reflecting not just the ongoing that exceeds our target. successful integration of 2st Century but also continued expense management as well as higher profitability from These results reflect our continued ability to execute Farmers Re following higher quota share arrangements. against a proven strategy rooted in operational excellence and financial discipline. Given that strength, and with And finally, total return on Group investments was full confidence in the sustainability of the Zurich strategy, 6.3 percent, including investment income, realized gains the Board will recommend at the Annual General Meeting and losses and impairments, as well as changes in a gross dividend of CHF 6.00 per share, which represents unrealized gains and losses reported in shareholders’ an exceptionally high payout of earnings to shareholders equity.
    [Show full text]
  • Shareholder Information
    Shareholder Information Executive Offices 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Copies of the firm’s 2012 Annual Report on 200 West Street Form 10-K as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange New York, New York 10282 Commission can be accessed via our Web site at 1-212-902-1000 www.goldmansachs.com/shareholders/. www.goldmansachs.com Copies can also be obtained by Common Stock contacting Investor Relations via email at The common stock of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is [email protected] listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under or by calling 1-212-902-0300. the ticker symbol “GS.” Transfer Agent and Registrar for Common Stock Shareholder Inquiries Questions from registered shareholders of The Goldman Information about the firm, including all quarterly earnings Sachs Group, Inc. regarding lost or stolen stock certificates, releases and financial filings with the U.S. Securities and dividends, changes of address and other issues related to Exchange Commission, can be accessed via our Web site registered share ownership should be addressed to: at www.goldmansachs.com. Computershare Shareholder inquiries can also be 480 Washington Boulevard directed to Investor Relations via email at Jersey City, New Jersey 07310 [email protected] U.S. and Canada: 1-800-419-2595 or by calling 1-212-902-0300. International: 1-201-680-6541 www.computershare.com Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers Center 300 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017 The papers used in the printing of this Annual Report are certified by © 2013 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Msci Index Calculation Methodology
    INDEX METHODOLOGY MSCI INDEX CALCULATION METHODOLOGY Index Calculation Methodology for the MSCI Equity Indexes Esquivel, Carlos July 2018 JULY 2018 MSCI INDEX CALCULATION METHODOLOGY | JULY 2018 CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 MSCI Equity Indexes........................................................................... 5 1 MSCI Price Index Methodology ................................................... 6 1.1 Price Index Level ....................................................................................... 6 1.2 Price Index Level (Alternative Calculation Formula – Contribution Method) ............................................................................................................ 10 1.3 Next Day Initial Security Weight ............................................................ 15 1.4 Closing Index Market Capitalization Today USD (Unadjusted Market Cap Today USD) ........................................................................................................ 16 1.5 Security Index Of Price In Local .............................................................. 17 1.6 Note on Index Calculation In Local Currency ......................................... 19 1.7 Conversion of Indexes Into Another Currency ....................................... 19 2 MSCI Daily Total Return (DTR) Index Methodology ................... 21 2.1 Calculation Methodology ....................................................................... 21 2.2 Reinvestment
    [Show full text]
  • German Aspects of Acquisition Financing
    Dr. Birgit Friedl European Counsel Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Munich 3 Dr. Birgit Friedl | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP German Aspects of Acquisition Financing International financial investors are increasingly discovering the German market as a playing field for interesting investments and are achieving attractive returns on investment. After streamlining their portfolios, strategic investors have also rediscovered their interest in strengthening their core business via acquisitions. Underlying Structure In the majority of M&A transactions, a company either acquired off the shelf or newly incorporated in the form of a limited liability company (GmbH) functions as the purchaser of the target and as borrower under the acquisition financing. These acquisition vehicles are to a certain extent funded with equity by the shareholders, while the remaining purchase price of the target is financed with bank debt. The funds required for the subsequent debt service are to be generated from the cash-flow that the operational business of the target company produces. Furthermore, extensive securities are generally granted to the lenders. In the context of acquisitions by strategic investors, payment guarantees issued by the parent company, which is the ultimate economic beneficiary behind the trans- action, may be considered. Especially in the case of financial investors, the lenders also tend to concentrate on the target company and their operative subsidiaries as grantor of securities and issuer of guarantees. Simultaneously with the actual acquisition financing, the existing bank financing of the target group is often paid and refinanced and a new working capital 44 facility is granted. This generally takes place within the framework of a separate Dr.
    [Show full text]