Flawed Justice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Guenter Lewy. Perpetrators: The World of the Holocaust Killers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 208 pp. $29.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-19-066113-7. Reviewed by Mark Montesclaros Published on H-War (November, 2017) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Over seventy years have passed since the lib‐ close contact with the victims. It is in the tradition eration of the notorious Nazi concentration and of earlier works, among them Christopher Brown‐ extermination camp at Auschwitz by the Russian ing’s Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 army in January 1945. Yet, even today, the Ger‐ and the Final Solution in Poland (1992), Daniel man state continues to convict and sentence for‐ Jonah Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners: mer SS guards who served at Auschwitz—a sym‐ Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (1996), and bol of the Holocaust—despite the advanced age Saul Friedlander’s Nazi Germany and the Jews, and declining health of both perpetrators and wit‐ 1939-1945: The Years of Extermination (2007), the nesses. Has Germany always demonstrated the second of a two-part history. Each of these de‐ political will to try such perpetrators, decades af‐ scribes in graphic detail the nature of the perpe‐ ter the commission of the acts? What about the trators’ roles, and each draws its own conclusion uniformity of sentences imposed? In an insightful as to what motivated the killers. Lewy follows suit new work, Guenter Lewy examines these key in Perpetrators. questions as well as others, focusing specifically The author brings several unique perspec‐ on the perpetrators—their crimes, their motiva‐ tives to his survey of Holocaust perpetrators. He tions, and justice received. His book, while a diffi‐ witnessed Kristallnacht as a child and his father cult read, makes an important contribution to our survived a short internment at the notorious understanding of the Holocaust. Buchenwald concentration camp. For Lewy, “tak‐ As one can perhaps surmise by its title, Perpe‐ ing up the subject of why so many ordinary Ger‐ trators: The World of the Holocaust Killers is a mans participated in Nazi crimes was ... of more grim and unrelenting work, which, like most of its than theoretical interest. It illuminates a chapter predecessors, spares no detail in order to illumi‐ in my personal life that I cannot and should not nate the horrific acts associated with facilitators forget” (p. ix). Lewy is passionate yet objective of the Holocaust at the ground level. The author throughout the book, despite the one-sided nature writes, “Much of the book, unfortunately, reads of his subject matter. Also unique is his source like a catalogue of horrors” (p. viii). Thus, the fo‐ material; the author relies heavily on evidence cus of Lewy’s book is on the killers themselves, as not previously available in the English language. opposed to bureaucrats or staff members who en‐ Most important here are the German court trial abled the Holocaust from a distance, avoiding records of many of the Nazi functionaries and H-Net Reviews perpetrators, particularly those that focus on a very personal, ground-level view of what tran‐ crimes committed during the years 1939-45. Of spired. Accounts of participants, victims, and eye‐ course, the German legal system continues to try witnesses regarding the mass killings, crimes perpetrators, as mentioned above, so the author against women and children (as well as infants), also references those trial transcripts. In addition, and medical experimentation are particularly Lewy includes other non-English-language devastating, harrowing to read, and difficult to sources, such as letters from German soldiers as‐ imagine. The author includes accounts of well- signed in the East to their families back home; di‐ known as well as obscure perpetrators, whether aries; and eyewitness accounts, previously un‐ members of the SS, the Wehrmacht, or other na‐ tapped, from Jewish survivors of the Holocaust. tional contingents who willingly participated in Collectively, Lewy’s sources and personal insight the mass murder of Jews. Collectively, the ac‐ add depth and value to the growing literature fo‐ counts encapsulate the horrors of the perpetrator cusing specifically on the Holocaust perpetrator world and are perhaps necessary to gain an un‐ perspective. derstanding of the magnitude of the crimes com‐ Perpetrators is organized clearly and logical‐ mitted on behalf of the Nazi state. They also help ly. Following an introduction that contains a use‐ to put into context the extent of justice doled out ful survey of the literature to set the context, to the perpetrators once put on trial. Lewy divides the book into seven chapters. The This leads to perhaps the book’s greatest con‐ first four analyze categories of killers: concentra‐ tribution: Lewy’s insights on “flawed justice.” The tion camp guards, members of the mobile task author shows us that in many cases justice was ei‐ force death squads (Einsatzgruppen), and those ther not served or served unevenly at best. As an who served in death camps—those designed example, Lewy shows that through the year 2005, specifically to kill rather than “concentrate” Jews (West) German authorities had brought charges and other persons deemed unworthy of life by the against 16,704 alleged perpetrators, from an esti‐ Third Reich. Chapter 5 provides valuable insight mated population of well over 100,000 potential on what options were available for those who killers in the organizations most involved. Of chose not to participate in the killings, and how these, only 981 were accused of offenses involving the chain of command dealt with them. In the killing, and of that small number only 182 re‐ penultimate chapter, the longest and perhaps ceived the maximum sentence—life imprison‐ most useful, Lewy effectively describes the inade‐ ment—under German law (pp. 88-89). (Note that quacies of postwar judicial systems that resulted Germany abolished the death sentence in 1949; in “flawed justice” for the perpetrators as a whole relatively few German courts administered that (p. 87). (It is one of Lewy’s central arguments and penalty prior to that time. By comparison, the Al‐ provides the title for this review.) The fnal chap‐ lied military tribunals in the western zones of oc‐ ter provides the author’s conclusions as to what cupation executed a far greater number of con‐ motivated “ordinary people” to kill, essentially victed perpetrators—approximately 6,500—be‐ adding to the conversation established over time fore 1949.) by Browning and Goldhagen, among many others. Lewy posits a number of reasons for this The strengths of Perpetrators are the added seemingly dismal record. Among them were the depth and breadth the book brings to Holocaust difficulty in fnding and trying defendants in the discussions. While descriptions of the atrocities chaos of the immediate postwar period, the ebb are familiar to specialists, Lewy’s use of court and fow of German public opinion that favored records includes eyewitness accounts that convey perpetrators during much of the Cold War, and 2 H-Net Reviews the political-military climate of the Cold War it‐ perpetrators, a monocausal explanation does suf‐ self. Another reason is the differing legal stan‐ fice.”[1] Lewy contends that there is no single ex‐ dards between the Allied military tribunal system planation for why perpetrators killed, nor was and the German civil system; the Allies employed there any single murderous prototype. He recites a “common design” framework in which defen‐ a litany of potential reasons, then discounts them dants could be charged based on membership in a one by one as singular causes. The author does particular killing organization or assignment at a agree, however, with a number of Browning’s so‐ death camp, regardless of their specific role in the cial constructs that existed within such organiza‐ machinery of killing. Most useful are Lewy’s in‐ tions as the Reserve Police Battalion 101, which sights into the inner workings of the German made it easier for killers to kill, although he court system, with the ebb and fow of judicial would argue that anti-Semitism played a larger rulings, legislative changes, and reaction to public role in perpetrator motivation than Browning ar‐ opinion. Lewy characterizes the postwar German gues in Ordinary Men. (Browning focuses primar‐ judiciary as “tainted” (p. 116). For example, many ily on structural reasons, such as the Nazi indoc‐ postwar judges were members of the Nazi Party, trination policy regarding the Jews,[2] rather than and the state retained many of them despite the any latent anti-Semitism on the part of ordinary Allies’ systematic denazification program. Hence, Germans, as more critical in motivating perpetra‐ those who escaped justice themselves were sitting tors.) Lewy’s argument is thus nuanced and based in judgment of others. As a result, many judges on multiple influences, none of which is pre-de‐ were sympathetic with defendants, resulting in terministic: “None of these factors creates causali‐ inconsistent or reduced sentences. Of course, ty or dictates a person’s behavior.... There re‐ complicating all of this was the political-military mains an element of personal agency” (p. 136). atmosphere within Germany, especially with the Some may question the book’s length; it is onset of the Cold War. The Allies, in need of West only 136 pages, excluding notes and index. Per‐ Germany as a bulwark against the Soviet Union, haps it could have been published as a chapter or ceased the aggressive pursuit of war criminals, journal article, or made longer with additional also resulting in commutations or reduced sen‐ depth, evidence, and insight provided by Lewy’s tences. In the decades since, with generational excellent source material. Regardless, the author changes and shifts in German attitudes, the Ger‐ makes a valuable contribution by providing detail man state today continues to convict Holocaust on the perpetrators and by offering his views on killers with marked determination.
Recommended publications
  • The Armenian Cause in America Today

    The Armenian Cause in America Today

    THE ARMENIAN CAUSE IN AMERICA TODAY While meager Turkish American NGO assets are dedicated to cultural events and providing education on a wide range of political issues, approximately $40 million in Armenian American NGO assets are primarily dedicated to what is referred to in Armenian as Hai Tahd, ‘The Armenian Cause’. Hai Tahd includes three policy objectives: Recognition that the 1885-1919 Armenian tragedy constitutes genocide; Reparations from Turkey; and, Restitution of the eastern provinces of Turkey to Armenia. This paper examines the Armenian American strategy and the response of Turkish American via the Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA). Günay Evinch Gunay Evinch (Övünç) practices international public law at Saltzman & Evinch and serves as Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) Vice-President for the Capital Region. He researched the Armenian case in Turkey as a U.S. Congressional Fulbright Scholar and Japan Sasakawa Peace Foundation Scholar in international law in 1991-93. To view media coverage and photographs associated with this article, please see, Günay Evinch, “The Armenian Cause Today,” The Turkish American, Vol. 2, No. 8 (Summer 2005), pp. 22-29. Also viewable at www.ATAA.org The Ottoman Armenian tragedy of 1880-1919 is a dark episode in the history of Turkish and Armenian relations. Over one million Muslims, mostly Kurds, Turks, and Arabs, and almost 600,000 Armenians perished in eastern Anatolia alone. WWI took the lives of 10 million combatants and 50 million civilians. While Russia suffered the greatest population deficit, the Ottoman Empire lost over five million, of which nearly 4 million were Muslims, 600,000 were Armenian, 300,000 were Greek, and 100,000 were Ottoman Jews.1 Moreover, the millennial Armenian presence in eastern Anatolia ended.
  • HISTORY 319—THE VIETNAM WARS Fall 2017 Mr

    HISTORY 319—THE VIETNAM WARS Fall 2017 Mr

    University of Wisconsin–Madison Department of History HISTORY 319—THE VIETNAM WARS Fall 2017 Mr. McCoy I. COURSE PROCEDURES: Class Meetings: Lectures are given in 1111 Humanities by Mr. McCoy on Tuesdays and Thursdays, from 4:00 to 5:15 p.m. In addition, students will attend a one-hour discussion section each week conducted by the Teaching Assistant (TA) for this course. N.B. Laptops may used only for taking notes and may not be used to access the Internet. Office Hours: —For Marlana Margaria, Humanities Room 4274, on Tuesdays from 1:45 to 3:45 p.m. and other hours by appointment (TEL: 265-9480). Messages may be left in Humanities Mailbox No. 4041, or sent via e-mail to: <[email protected]> —For Alfred McCoy, Humanities Room 5131, Thursdays 12:00 to 2:00 p.m. and other hours by appointment (TEL: 263-1855). Messages may be left in Humanities Mailbox No. 5026, or sent via e-mail to: <[email protected]> Grading: Students shall complete three pieces of written work. On October 19, students shall take a midterm examination. On November 21, students shall submit a 5,000-word research essay with full footnotes and bibliographic references. During examination week on December 16, students shall take a two-hour final examination. Final grades shall be computed as follows: —midterm take-home exam: 20% —research essay: 30% —discussion section mark: 30% —final examination: 20% —extra credit/film viewing: 3% Course Requirements: For each of these assignments, there are different requirements for both the amount and form of work to be done: a.) Midterm take-home examination: Select two questions from a list distributed in the lecture on Thursday, October 19, and turn in two short essays totaling five typed pages, with full endnote citations, at the start of class on Tuesday, October 24.
  • Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism

    Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism

    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Roma and Sinti Under-Studied Victims of Nazism Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2002 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, July 2004 Copyright © 2002 by Ian Hancock, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Michael Zimmermann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Guenter Lewy, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Mark Biondich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Denis Peschanski, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by Viorel Achim, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2002 by David M. Crowe, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................i Paul A. Shapiro and Robert M. Ehrenreich Romani Americans (“Gypsies”).......................................................................................................1 Ian
  • The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey—A Disputed Genocide

    The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey—A Disputed Genocide

    Literatur/Book Reviews / Die Welt des Islams 50 (2010) 153-183 181 The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey—A Disputed Genocide. By Guenter Lewy. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2005. 356 pp., ISBN 0-87480-849-9, 3 maps, hardcover, $ 24.95. The book sets out to examine the dominant Armenian and Turkish theses on the Armenian Genocide. The author suggests that two opposing camps exist among histo- rians. While working largely with published material, he makes extensive use of German Foreign Office (Auswärtiges Amt, hereafter: AA) documents. Importantly, in his discussion Lewy does not clearly distinguish between academic studies, pamphlets, various types of memoirs, etc. despite his suggestion “that survivor accounts, like all other historical evidence, must be analyzed carefully and critically” (p. 148). Non- specialists will therefore find it difficult to understand current debates. Lewy states that at the center of what he labels a “quarrel” stands the question of premeditation, but his concept of genocide is not necessarily shared by the legal community.1 Likewise, his reading of 19th century Ottoman history is limited. Social and economic aspects receive little attention and his account resembles a moderate version of what could be labeled official Turkish histories. He also appears to be lacking familiarity with impor- tant sources. For instance, Ziya Gökalp’s involvement in the Armenian Genocide is hardly discussed. Contemporaries of this known writer, who was also a member of the ruling Committee for Union and Progress’ central committee, did not see him simply as a “respected advisor on cultural and educational issues” (p.
  • Native American History, Comparative Genocide and the Holocaust: Historiography, Debate and Critical Analysis

    Native American History, Comparative Genocide and the Holocaust: Historiography, Debate and Critical Analysis

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History History, Department of April 2006 NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY, COMPARATIVE GENOCIDE AND THE HOLOCAUST: HISTORIOGRAPHY, DEBATE AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS Brenden Rensink University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the History Commons Rensink, Brenden, "NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY, COMPARATIVE GENOCIDE AND THE HOLOCAUST: HISTORIOGRAPHY, DEBATE AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS" (2006). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 2. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY, COMPARATIVE GENOCIDE AND THE HOLOCAUST: HISTORIOGRAPHY, DEBATE AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS By Brenden W. Rensink A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor John R. Wunder Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2006 NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY, COMPARATIVE GENOCIDE AND THE HOLOCAUST: HISTORIOGRAPHY, DEBATE AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS Brenden William Rensink, M.A. University of Nebraska, 2006 Adviser: John R. Wunder This study explores the complex issues surrounding comparative genocide studies and how Native American history relates to this field. Historical contexts for Native American historiography, particularly the scholarship of Vine Deloria, Jr., are examined. In addition, the manifestation of some problematic trends in the field is detailed through the mordant debate between scholars of native America and the Jewish Holocaust.
  • Holocaust Perpetrators and Historiographic Blind Spots

    Holocaust Perpetrators and Historiographic Blind Spots

    JPR Holocaust Perpetrators and Historiographic Blind Spots Kjell Anderson Review of: Guenter Lewy, Perpetrators: The World of the Holocaust Killers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017). 208 pp. 13 illustrations. £21.99 (hb). ISBN: 978-0-1906-6113-7. he historiography of the Holocaust is vast. Yet, even amidst this prodigious scholarship, blind spots remain. Political scientist Guenter Lewy tackles two of these in his new book Perpetrators: The World of the Holocaust Killers – the dearth of research on the perpetrators themselves, and the relative Tfailure of Holocaust (or transitional justice) scholars to examine post-war trials in Germany. While there are notable books on individual perpetrators, such as Gitta Sereny’s interview-based biography of Franz Stangl1 (commandant of the Treblin- ka extermination camp) or Jasch and Kreutzmüller’s The Participants: The Men of the Wannsee Conference; some others on perpetrator organizations, such as the Einsatz- gruppen (Masters of Death);2 and innumerable Holocaust monographs which touch upon perpetrators, general volumes on Holocaust perpetrators are nearly non-ex- istent. There are exceptions, of course, such asThe Good Old Days,3 which is largely a collection of primary documents; Soldaten,4 which focuses narrowly (but brilliantly) on several recorded conversations among German POWs; and Jensen and Szejnman’s edited volume Ordinary People as Mass Murderers: Perpetrators in Comparative Perspectives,5 which, although a significant contribution, presents a patchy analysis of Holocaust per- petrators. To this list we can add the promising and very recently published Holocaust Perpetrators of the German Police Battalions: The Mass Murder of Jewish Civilians, 1940–1942 by Ian Rich, as well as Browning’s landmark work on Reserve Police Battalion 101, Ordi- nary Men, and Wendy Lower’s examination of female perpetrators, Hitler’s Furies.6 1 Gitta Sereny, Into That Darkness: An Examination of Conscience (New York: Vintage Books, 1974).
  • Religious and Secular Responses to Nazism: Coordinated and Singular Acts of Opposition

    Religious and Secular Responses to Nazism: Coordinated and Singular Acts of Opposition

    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 Religious And Secular Responses To Nazism: Coordinated And Singular Acts Of Opposition Kathryn Sullivan University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Sullivan, Kathryn, "Religious And Secular Responses To Nazism: Coordinated And Singular Acts Of Opposition" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 891. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/891 RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR RESPONSES TO NAZISM COORDINATED AND SINGULAR ACTS OF OPPOSITION by KATHRYN M. SULLIVAN B.A. University of Central Florida, 2003 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2006 © 2006 Kathryn M. Sullivan ii ABSTRACT My intention in conducting this research is to satisfy the requirements of earning a Master of Art degree in the Department of History at the University of Central Florida. My research aim has been to examine literature written from the 1930’s through 2006 which chronicles the lives of Jewish and Gentile German men, women, and children living under Nazism during the years 1933-1945.
  • The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965 Ii Introduction Introduction Iii

    The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965 Ii Introduction Introduction Iii

    Introduction i The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965 ii Introduction Introduction iii The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930 –1965 Michael Phayer INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS Bloomington and Indianapolis iv Introduction This book is a publication of Indiana University Press 601 North Morton Street Bloomington, IN 47404-3797 USA http://www.indiana.edu/~iupress Telephone orders 800-842-6796 Fax orders 812-855-7931 Orders by e-mail [email protected] © 2000 by John Michael Phayer All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and re- cording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of Ameri- can University Presses’ Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Perma- nence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Phayer, Michael, date. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965 / Michael Phayer. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-253-33725-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pius XII, Pope, 1876–1958—Relations with Jews. 2. Judaism —Relations—Catholic Church. 3. Catholic Church—Relations— Judaism. 4. Holocaust, Jewish (1939–1945) 5. World War, 1939– 1945—Religious aspects—Catholic Church. 6. Christianity and an- tisemitism—History—20th century. I. Title. BX1378 .P49 2000 282'.09'044—dc21 99-087415 ISBN 0-253-21471-8 (pbk.) 2 3 4 5 6 05 04 03 02 01 Introduction v C O N T E N T S Acknowledgments ix Introduction xi 1.
  • The Rules of Defeat: the Impact of Aerial Rules of Engagement

    The Rules of Defeat: the Impact of Aerial Rules of Engagement

    THE RULES OF DEFEAT: THE IMPACT OF AERIAL RULES OF ENGAGEMENT ON USAF OPERATIONS IN NORTH VIETNAM, 1965-1968 Major Ricky James Drake Phenix City, Alabama A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The School of Advanced Airpower Studies For Completion of Graduation Requirements School of Advanced Airpower Studies Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama May 1992 Disclaimer The views in this paper are entirely those of the author expressed under Air University principles of academic freedom and do not reflect official views of the school of Advanced Airpower Studies, Air University, the U.s. Air Force, or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Regulation 110-8, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION. 1 2. BACKGRIDUND INFORMATION. 3 3. IMPACT OF ROEs ON MILITARY COMMANDERS AND AIRCREWS. 12 4. ROLLINIG THUNDER --MISSION EFFECTIVENESS. 20 5. IMPACT OF ROEs ON THE ENEMY. 27 6. CONCLUSIONS. 32 ABSTRACT During the Vietnam War, many American air commanders were convinced that rigid Rules of Engagement (ROEs) prevented an American aerial victory over North Vietnam during the Rolling Thunder air campaign from 1965-1968. ROEs were directives issued by civilian authority to guide the conduct of all US aerial operations in Southeast Asia. To the men "in the field" these rules provided detailed guidance to be followed by all commanders, air planners, control personnel, and combat crew members in the actual planning and flying of combat missions. ROEs allowed President Lyndon Johnson to apply measured amounts of air power both to avoid escalation of the war into World War III and to preserve domestic social programs.
  • Discriminating Genocide from War Crimes: Vietnam and Afghanistan Reexamined

    Discriminating Genocide from War Crimes: Vietnam and Afghanistan Reexamined

    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 22 Number 1 Fall Article 4 May 2020 Discriminating Genocide from War Crimes: Vietnam and Afghanistan Reexamined Helen Fein Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Helen Fein, Discriminating Genocide from War Crimes: Vietnam and Afghanistan Reexamined, 22 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 29 (1993). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Discriminating Genocide From War Crimes: Vietnam and Afghanistan Reexamined HELEN FEIN* Raphael Lemkin introduced the concept of genocide in 1942 as a way to understand the objective of Germany's policies toward the population of the occupied states.1 Historically, this term has been used "to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essen- tial foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilat- ing the groups themselves."2 Since 1944, the concept has frequently been misused rhetorically and metaphorically for political ends. For instance, segregation and integration, drug addiction and methadone-maintenance, free choice of abortion and enforced birth control, AIDS, and condom use each have been labelled as "genocide."' Despite the prevalence of geno- cide4 -and the importance of the concept as an international norm, no sat- isfactory method exists to distinguish putative cases from rhetorical mis- uses and specious claims.
  • United States District Court District of Columbia Complaint Jurisdiction and Venue

    United States District Court District of Columbia Complaint Jurisdiction and Venue

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Guenter Lewy 4101 Cathedral Ave. N.W. Apt. 917 Civil Action No. Washington, DC 20016-7500, Plaintiff, v. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc., and David Holthouse Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Guenter Lewy (“Plaintiff”) brings this Complaint for defamation against the Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc., and David Holthouse (“Defendants”) and states the following: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court enjoys subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) because the Plaintiff and Defendants are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 2. This Court enjoys personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because the false and defamatory statements made by Defendants were published in the District of Columbia, and the Plaintiff-target of the defamatory statements was and remains a resident of the District of Columbia. 3. This Court enjoys venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2) because all or a substantial portion of the events that gave rise to Plaintiff’s claims transpired in the District of Columbia, including the publication or republication of the defamatory falsehoods and the damage to Plaintiff’s reputation. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff, Guenter Lewy, is an emeritus professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts and author of several academic books and articles published by university presses and other reputable publishing houses, including The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany (McGraw Hill, 1964), Religion and Revolution (Oxford University Press, 1974), America in Vietnam (Oxford University Press, 1978), The Nazi Persecution of the Gypsies (Oxford University Press, 2000), and The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide (University of Utah Press, 2005).
  • Historiographical Review Confronting the Communal Grave: a Reassessment of Social Relations During the Holocaust in Eastern Europe*

    Historiographical Review Confronting the Communal Grave: a Reassessment of Social Relations During the Holocaust in Eastern Europe*

    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © Cambridge University Press doi:./SX HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW CONFRONTING THE COMMUNAL GRAVE: A REASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL RELATIONS DURING THE HOLOCAUST IN EASTERN EUROPE* JAN BURZLAFF Harvard University ABSTRACT. This historiographical review focuses on the complex interactions between Nazi Germany, local populations, and east European Jews during the Holocaust. Braving fierce historical revisionism in eastern Europe and the Baltic states, recent studies have shifted the spotlight from Germans to Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, Lithuanians, and other ethnicities. As a result, the ana- lytic categories with which most historians still work – notably ‘perpetrator/victim/bystander’ and ‘collaboration/resistance’–have outlived their usefulness. A more complex picture of the Nazi- occupied territories in eastern Europe has emerged and now awaits new theoretical frameworks. This article argues that past paradigms blinded scholars to a range of groups lost in the cracks and to behaviours remaining outside the political sphere. Through four criteria that shed light on the social history of the Holocaust in eastern Europe, it draws connections between central and east European, German, Jewish, and Soviet histories, in order to engage with other fields and disciplines that examine modern mass violence and genocide. As Holocaust studies stands at a crossroads, only a transnational history including all ethnicities and deeper continuities, both temporal and geograph- ical, will enhance our knowledge of how social relations shaped the very evolution of the Holocaust. Who owns history? ‘Everyone and no one’ was the US historian Eric Foner’s assessment in . Noting a deep fissure between academic and public dis- course on slavery, the Civil War, and the Reconstruction era, Foner urged his- torians to reinvigorate their engagement with public history.