Extractive Metallurgy of Rare Earths

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extractive Metallurgy of Rare Earths Extractive metallurgy of rare earths F. Habashi* A short account is given on the extraction of rare earths from monazite sand, bastnasite ore, and phosphate rock of igneous origin. This includes mineral beneficiation, leaching methods, fractional crystallisation [of historical interest], ion exchange, solvent extraction, precipitation from solution, and reduction to metals. On donne un bref compte-rendu de l’extraction des terres rares a` partir de sable monazite´, de minerai de bastnae´site et de roche phosphate´e d’origine igne´e. Ceci inclut l’enrichissement du mine´ral, les me´thodes de lixiviation, la cristallisation fractionnelle (d’inte´reˆt historique), l’e´change d’ion, l’extraction par solvant, la pre´cipitation a` partir de solution et la re´duction en me´taux. Keywords: Carl Auer, Monazite, Bastnasite, Phosphate rock, Beneficiation, Leaching, Fractional crystallisation, Ion exchange, Solvent extraction, Precipitation from solution, Reduction This paper is part of a special issue on Advances in Rare Earths: From Mine to Materials Historical introduction for gas mantle declined later when the Edison lamp was invented at the beginning of the twentieth century. Although most of the rare earth metals were discovered The second industrial application of rare earths came in Sweden, the industrialisation started in the Austrian when Carl Auer recalled the preparation of metallic cerium Empire. This was due to the fact that the Swedish by his colleagues at Bunsen’s laboratory and the sparking chemist Jons Fridrik Bahr (1815–1875) from Uppsala of the metal when scratched or drawn over a rough surface. went to Heidelberg in Germany in 1855 to analyse some He conceived that this sparking action may be utilised for rare earth minerals by the spectroscope discovered ignition purposes. However, cerium would be a too costly recently by chemistry professor Robert Bunsen (1811– material. He, therefore, prepared a cerium–iron alloy and 1899) and his colleague physicist Gustav Kirchhoff found out that when the alloy contained 30%Fe it gave the (1824–1887). Few years later Carl Auer (1858–1929) best sparking effect suitable for ignition of gases. The ‘Auer from Vienna went also to Heidelberg to study under lighter’ soon became as famous as his incandescent mantle Bunsen. He was assigned the task to separate the rare when it was produced on large scale in 1903. Production earths from these minerals. On his return home, Carl reached 1 000 000 kg annually in 1930; it served to prepare Auer took with him the remaining minerals to continue 500 million flints which replaced six billion boxes of his studies at the University of Vienna.1,2 matches. This work was conducted at his new factory at While in Heidelberg, Carl Auer had noted the re- Treibach in Carinthia which he took possession in 1900 markable light-emitting powers of the rare earth oxides and which is today a successful metallurgical plant known when they were inserted into the flame of a Bunsen as Treibacher Chemische Werke in Austria. burner. In Vienna he put this observation into practice by inventing the gas mantle, a stocking made of cotton Rare earths elements thread and soaked in a solution of the earth metal salts. After the organic matter was burned off, a skeleton of Originally, the term rare earths was only used for the the metal oxide was left. This emitted light when heated oxides, R2O3, which are similar to one other in their in a laboratory Bunsen burner. In 1887, he started a chemical and physical properties and are therefore factory at Atzgersdorf, a suburb of Vienna, to separate difficult to separate. Within the rare earth group, the the rare earths salts necessary for preparing the soaking elements scandium, yttrium, and lanthanum differ in their solution for manufacturing the gas mantles for lighting atomic structure from the elements cerium to lutetium. the streets in Vienna. He also sold the solutions to The term lanthanides was abbreviated Ln by Chemical customers in Germany, England, and USA. The marked Abstracts. Scandium occupies a special position with respect to this classification and its other properties, and therefore does not belong to either of these groups. The rare earth elements always occur in nature in association Department of Mining, Metallurgical, and Materials Engineering, Laval with each other. The isolation of groups of rare earth University, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Canada elements or of individual elements requires costly separa- *Corresponding author, email [email protected] tion and fractionation processes owing to the great ß 2013 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Published by Maney on behalf of the Institute Received 28 November 2012; accepted 23 April 2013 224 DOI 10.1179/1879139513Y.0000000081 Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 2013 VOL 52 NO 3 Habashi Extractive metallurgy of rare earths 1 Separation of monazite and other valuable minerals from monazite sand by physical methods similarity of the chemical and physical properties of their containing some thorium and small amounts of ura- compounds, which explains why the history of their nium. It is widely distributed in the Earth’s crust. It discovery has extended over such a long period. occurs in small proportions in granites. When such rocks The word ‘rare’, when used to describe this group of are weathered, grains of monazite are carried by waters, elements, originates from the fact it was thought that then deposited at the mouths of rivers, together with the these elements could only be isolated from very rare heavier constituents of the parent rock, to form black minerals. Considering their abundance in the Earth’s sands known as monazite sand. The monazite in these crust, the term rare is now inappropriate. These elements sands is usually present in rounded grains, showing that are lithophilic and are therefore concentrated in oxidic the grains have previously been rolled to and fro in compounds such as carbonates, silicates, titano-tantalo- streams of water. Monazite sands occur mainly in Brazil, niobates, and phosphates. India, Australia, and USA. Xenotime is also a lantha- The abundance of the rare earth elements taken nide phosphate but the individual lanthanides occur in a together is quite considerable. Cerium, the most common different proportion from that in monazite. It occurs rare earth, is more abundant than cobalt. Yttrium is more mainly in South East Asia associated with alluvial tin abundant than lead, whereas Lu and Tm are as abundant deposits. as Sb, Hg, Bi, and Ag. For all practical purposes Monazite sand and xenotime can be easily concen- promethium does not occur in nature. It forms only in trated from the sands by physical methods. For nuclear reactors. example, a monazite sand containing 1% monazite can be concentrated by gravity, magnetic, and electrostatic Raw material methods to a concentrate containing 85% monazite The major raw material for rare earths is monazite sand, (Fig. 1). Some physical properties of monazite and xenotime, bastnasite, and phosphate rock. xenotime concentrates are given in Table 1. A chemical analysis of the concentrates is given in Table 2. The Monazite and xenotime composition of the lanthanide fraction in monazite, in Monazite derives its name from Creek meaninc to be xenotime, and bastnasite is given in Table 3. Scandium, alone. The mineral monazite is a lanthanide phosphate although in the same group with yttrium, lanthanum, Table 1 Physical properties of lanthanide phosphate minerals Monazite Xenotime Colour Yellow to red brown Pale yellow to brownish green Specific gravity 4.9–5.54.45–4.59 Hardness (Mohs) 5 4.5 Crystal structure Monoclinic Tetragonal Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 2013 VOL 52 NO 3 225 Habashi Extractive metallurgy of rare earths Table 2 Chemical analysis of lanthanide phosphate Ce)2(Nb,Ta,Ti)2O6 in the Kola Peninsula and also in concentrates most uranium minerals as trace substituents. Monazite Xenotime Scandium occurs in trace amounts in most rare earth concentrate/% concentrate/% minerals. In many minerals, scandium is present in a dispersed state. Wolframite and cassiterite can contain P2O5 24–29 … up to 1% scandium, so that scandium is a byproduct of Ln2O3* 55–65 52–63 the production of tungsten and tin. Uranium minerals ThO2 5–10 1–3 contain much smaller amounts of scandium, but, since U O 0.2–0.40.5–3.5 3 8 uranium is produced in relatively large quantities, SiO2 1–3 … CaO 0.2–0.8… scandium is produced in appreciable quantities also. Fe2O3 1–2 … . Phosphate rock Al2O3 0 1–0 8… . ZrO2 0 7 2–3 Tonnage wise, phosphate rock is the most important as SnO2 … 0–9 compared with the other material; about 120 millions *Ln, lanthanide. tons of rock are treated annually while only 30 000 tons of monazite and xenotime. However, no production of and the lanthanides, is not present in any of these rare earths from this source is actually conducted. minerals. Apatite is the principal constituent of phosphate rock. Monazite and xenotime are the main source of The mineral received its name from the Greek word thorium and the lanthanides; uranium is recovered as meaning I deceive when it was realised that it was frequently confused with other mineral species, includ- a byproduct. ing beryl and tourmaline, prior to the latter part of the Bastnasite eighteenth century. Phosphate rock is the main raw material for the production of phosphatic fertilisers. The most important mined rare earth deposit is at the Phosphate rock is composed mainly of: Mountain Pass Mine in California, where up to 40 000 t/a (i) Fluorapatite, Ca (PO ) F bastnæsite ore concentrate (70% REO) is produced by ore 10 4 6 2 (ii) Hydroxyapatite, Ca (PO ) (OH) beneficiation. Other important bastnæsite deposits are in 10 4 6 2 (iii) Carbonato-apatite, Ca10(PO4)6CO3 Burundi, Madagascar, and in Bayan Obo, near the town Depending on the proportion of each component, the rock of Baotou in Inner Mongolia in China.
Recommended publications
  • Use of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria to Leach Rare Earth Elements from Monazite-Bearing Ore
    Minerals 2015, 5, 189-202; doi:10.3390/min5020189 OPEN ACCESS minerals ISSN 2075-163X www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Article Use of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria to Leach Rare Earth Elements from Monazite-Bearing Ore Doyun Shin 1,2,*, Jiwoong Kim 1, Byung-su Kim 1,2, Jinki Jeong 1,2 and Jae-chun Lee 1,2 1 Mineral Resources Resource Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), Gwahangno 124, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Korea; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (B.K.); [email protected] (J.J.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Department of Resource Recycling Engineering, Korea University of Science and Technology, Gajeongno 217, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Korea * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-42-868-3616. Academic Editor: Anna H. Kaksonen Received: 8 January 2015 / Accepted: 27 March 2015 / Published: 2 April 2015 Abstract: In the present study, the feasibility to use phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) to develop a biological leaching process of rare earth elements (REE) from monazite-bearing ore was determined. To predict the REE leaching capacity of bacteria, the phosphate solubilizing abilities of 10 species of PSB were determined by halo zone formation on Reyes minimal agar media supplemented with bromo cresol green together with a phosphate solubilization test in Reyes minimal liquid media as the screening studies. Calcium phosphate was used as a model mineral phosphate. Among the test PSB strains, Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. putida, P. rhizosphaerae, Mesorhizobium ciceri, Bacillus megaterium, and Acetobacter aceti formed halo zones, with the zone of A.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,186,995 B2 Putrello, Jr
    US008186995B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,186,995 B2 Putrello, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: May 29, 2012 (54) SURVIVAL TOOL FIRE STARTER WITH 148/404; 44/507,506, 508; 280/87.042: MISCHMETAL FLINTROD 126/25 B; 149/38, 41,42; 7/158 See application file for complete search history. (76) Inventor: Andrew C. Putrello, Jr., Utica, NY (US) (56) References Cited (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2,908,071 A * 10/1959 Bungardt ...................... 428,585 U.S.C. 154(b) by 765 days. 3,275,484. A * 9, 1966 Foote et al. ..................... 149,38 3.278,009 A * 10/1966 Crump, Jr. .................... 206,121 4,089,706 A 5/1978 Zeiringer (21) Appl. No.: 12/392,535 4,698,068 A * 10/1987 Jensen ............................ 44,507 6,782.576 B1 8, 2004 Valencic et al. (22) Filed: Feb. 25, 2009 2005/O127630 A1* 6/2005 Kuhlman et al. ........ 280/87.042 (65) Prior Publication Data * cited by examiner US 2009/0214996 A1 Aug. 27, 2009 Primary Examiner — Steven B McAllister Assistant Examiner — Avinash Savani Related U.S. Application Data (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Hiscock & Barclay, LLP (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/070,741, (57) ABSTRACT filed on Feb. 22, 2008. A fire-starter device for Survival or emergency use has a (51) Int. C. handle portion and case portion that twist together, to sheath a mischmetal flint rod inside the case, and a seal ring protects F23O I/02 (2006.01) the flint rod from environmental moisture.
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIUM - and RARE-EARTH ELEMENT-BEARING DEPOSITS at BOKAN MOUNTAIN, SOUTHEAST ALASKA by J
    COLUMBIUM - AND RARE-EARTH ELEMENT-BEARING DEPOSITS AT BOKAN MOUNTAIN, SOUTHEAST ALASKA By J. Dean Warner and James C. Barker Alaska Field Operations Center * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OFR - 33-89 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary BUREAU OF MINES T.S. Ary, Director TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ........................................................ 1 Introduction ....................... 2 Acknowledgments ................................................. 4 Location, access, and physiography .............................. 5 History and production ............. 5 Geologic setting .................................. 9 Trace element analyses of the peralkaline granite .............. 11 Nature of Bureau investigations ................................. 13 Sampling methods and analytical techniques .................... 13 Analytical interference, limitations, and self-shielding ...... 13 Resource estimation methods ................................... 15 Prospect evaluations .......................................... 16 Shear zones and fracture-controlled deposits .................... 18 Ross Adams mine ................. 18 Sunday Lake prospect.......................................... 21 I and L No. 1 and Wennie prospects ............................ 27 Other Occurrences ............................................. 31 Altered peralkaline granite ................................. 31 Dotson shear zone ........................................... 35 Resources ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0166788 A1 Pearse Et Al
    US 2014O166788A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0166788 A1 Pearse et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 19, 2014 (54) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MAGNETIC (52) U.S. Cl. SEPARATION OF RARE EARTHIS CPC. B03C I/02 (2013.01); B02C 23/08 (2013.01); B02C23/20 (2013.01) (76) Inventors: Gary Pearse, Ottawa (CA); Jonathan USPC .......... 241/20: 209/212: 209/214; 241/24.14; Borduas, Montreal (CA); Thomas 241/21 Gervais, Montreal (CA); David Menard, Laval (CA); Djamel Seddaoui, Repentigny (CA); Bora Ung, Quebec (CA) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 13/822,363 A system and a method for separating rare earth element (22) PCT Filed: Aug. 15, 2012 compounds from a slurry of mixed rare earth element com pounds, comprising flowing the slurry of mixed rare earth (86). PCT No.: PCT/CA12/50.552 element compounds through at least a first channel rigged S371 (c)(1), with at least a first magnet along a length thereof and con (2), (4) Date: May 17, 2013 nected to at least a first output channel at the position of the Publication Classification magnet, and retrieving individual rare earth element com pounds and/or groups of rare earth element compounds, sepa (51) Int. Cl. rated from the slurry as they are selectively attracted by the BO3C I/02 (2006.01) magnet and directed in the corresponding output channel B2C 23/20 (2006.01) according to their respective ratio of magnetic Susceptibility B2C 23/08 (2006.01) (AX) to specific density (Ap). Ferromagnetic particles are dia?pararnegnetic particles Submitted to a magnetic torque remain relatively unaffected by the torque As a result they roll left \\ Carried right by the slow rotating drum Patent Application Publication Jun.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2011/156817 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date Χ t it o n 1 15 December 2011 (15.12.2011) WO 2011/156817 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C02F1/58 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (21) International Application Number: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, PCT/US20 11/040214 DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, 13 June 201 1 (13.06.201 1) KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (25) Filing Language: English NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (26) Publication Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/354,031 11 June 2010 ( 11.06.2010) (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): MOLY- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, CORP MINERALS LLC [US/US]; 561 Denver Tech ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, Center Pkwy, Suite 1000, Greenwood Village, CO 801 11 TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Uses of Mischmetall in Organic Synthesis
    REVIEW 9 Mischmetall in organic synthesis Organic synthesis Organic synthesis New from Acros Organics Marie-Isabelle Lannou, Florence Hélion and Jean-Louis Namy Laboratoire de Catalyse Moléculaire, associé au CNRS, ICMO, Bat 420, Université de Paris-Sud, 91405, Orsay, France Some uses of mischmetall in organic synthesis ∗ Marie-Isabelle Lannou, Florence Hélion and Jean-Louis Namy Laboratoire de Catalyse Moléculaire, associé au CNRS, ICMO, Bat 420, Université Paris-Sud, 91405, Orsay, France. Abstract: Mischmetall, an alloy of the light lanthanides, has been used in a variety of organic reactions, either as a coreductant in samarium(II)-mediated reactions (Barbier and Grignard-type reactions, pinacolic coupling reactions) or as the promoter of Reformatsky-type reactions. It has been also employed as the starting material for easy syntheses of lanthanide trihalides, the reactivity of which has been explored in Imamoto and Luche-Fukuzawa reactions and in Mukaiyama aldol reactions. Keywords: mischmetall, samarium, lanthanide, catalysis, organic reactions Introduction The use of rare earth compounds in organic chemistry has grown considerably during the past twenty years. Mainly samarium, cerium, lanthanum, ytterbium, neodymium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium metals and derivatives have been studied. These elements clearly differ in terms of reactivity. For instance, samarium(II) compounds can be used as powerful reductants whereas cerium(IV) ones are strong oxidants, some scandium and ytterbium(III) derivatives are very efficient catalysts in a variety of reactions and chemistry of lanthanum metal shows special features. We thought however that in many reactions, a mixture of lanthanide could be used instead of individual element without significant change in results.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL RARE-EARTH PRODUCTION: HISTORY and OUTLOOK History – the Discovery
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Rare Earth Elements: Geology, Geography, and Geopolitics James B. Hedrick Hedrick Consultants, Inc. U.S. Rare Earths, Inc. Burke, Virginia December 15, 2010 Washington, DC GLOBAL RARE-EARTH PRODUCTION: HISTORY AND OUTLOOK History – The Discovery . The rare earths were discovered in 1787 by Swedish Army Lieutenant Carl Axel Arrhenius . Carl, an amateur mineralogist collected the black mineral ytterbite, later renamed gadolinite, from a small feldspar and quartz mine at Ytterby, Sweden . With similar chemical structures the rare earths proved difficult to separate . It was not until 1794 that Finnish chemist Johann Gadolin separated the first impure yttrium oxide from the mineral ytterbite History – The Discovery History – The Commercialization . The rare earths were commercialized when the incandescent lamp mantle industry was established in 1884 with mantles of zirconium, lanthanum, and yttrium oxides with later improvements requiring only the oxides of thorium and cerium. The lamp mantle was discovered by Baron Carl Auer von Welsbach . The mantles also used small amounts of neodymium and praseodymium as an indelible brand name Welsbach label History – The Early Mining . Rare earths were first produced commercially in the 1880s with the mining in Sweden and Norway of the rare-earth thorium phosphate mineral monazite . Foreign Production Brazil produced monazite as early as 1887 India produced monazite starting in 1911 . Domestic Production Monazite production in the United States was first recorded in 1893 in North Carolina - a small tonnage of monazite was reportedly mined in 1887 Monazite mining in South Carolina began in 1903 History – The Processing . Three main methods for separating and refining the rare- earth elements since they were discovered .
    [Show full text]
  • Producers Case Study the Changing
    Producers Case Study The Changing Geography of Rare Earth Element Production Introduction The locations where rare earth elements are produced changed repeatedly throughout the 1900s and early 2000s. This variation suggests that production is not determined primarily by the geographic location of rare earth ores. Instead, the location of mines and separation plants is driven by a combination of market prices, government policies, and the actions of producers and manufacturers. As a result where and how rare earth elements are produced could change in the future. Initial Rare Earth Metal Production Although a mineral containing rare earth elements was identified in Sweden in 1788, it took more than 100 years for the first significant industrial product to be made using the rare earths. In the 1890s chemist Carl Auer von Welsbach developed a mantle made of a mixture of 99% thorium and 1% cerium for use with gas streetlights. More than five billion mantles were sold worldwide through the 1930s. Welsbach also developed mischmetal, a mixture of rare earth elements cerium, lanthanum, neodymium, and praseodymium. When alloyed with iron, mischmetal produced a metal that sparked when struck. It was widely used in pocket cigarette lighters as well as automobile ignition switches. The Welsbach Company mined rare earth deposits located in coastal sands in Brazil, India, and North Carolina. India’s coastal sands are also rich in the radioactive element thorium, which is not a rare earth element. India banned the export of these sands in 1948 to preserve its thorium supply for a potential nuclear energy program. At that time the price of rare earth metals spiked until newly established mining locations briefly made South Africa the world’s leading exporter of rare earth ores in the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Shark Deterrent and Incidental Capture Workshop April 10–11, 2008
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-PIFSC-16 November 2008 Shark Deterrent and Incidental Capture Workshop April 10–11, 2008 Compiled and Edited by Yonat Swimmer, John H. Wang, and Lianne McNaughton Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce About this document The mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is to understand and predict changes in the Earth=s environment and to conserve and manage coastal and oceanic marine resources and habitats to help meet our Nation=s economic, social, and environmental needs. As a branch of NOAA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) conducts or sponsors research and monitoring programs to improve the scientific basis for conservation and management decisions. NMFS strives to make information about the purpose, methods, and results of its scientific studies widely available. NMFS= Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC) uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS series to achieve timely dissemination of scientific and technical information that is of high quality but inappropriate for publication in the formal peer- reviewed literature. The contents are of broad scope, including technical workshop proceedings, large data compilations, status reports and reviews, lengthy scientific or statistical monographs, and more. NOAA Technical Memoranda published by the PIFSC, although informal, are subjected to extensive review and editing and reflect sound professional work. Accordingly, they may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. A NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS issued by the PIFSC may be cited using the following format: Swimmer, Y, J. H. Wang, and L. McNaughton.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Commodity Summaries 2016
    134 RARE EARTHS1 [Data in metric tons of rare-earth oxide (REO) equivalent content unless otherwise noted] Domestic Production and Use: Rare earths were mined for part of the year by one company in 2015. Bastnäsite, a fluorocarbonate mineral, was mined and processed into concentrates and rare-earth compounds at Mountain Pass, CA. The United States continued to be a net importer of rare-earth products in 2015. The estimated value of rare- earth compounds and metals imported by the United States in 2015 was $150 million, a decrease from $191 million imported in 2014. The estimated distribution of rare earths by end use was as follows, in decreasing order: catalysts, 60%; metallurgical applications and alloys, 10%; ceramics and glass, 10%; glass polishing, 10%; and other, 10%. Salient Statistics—United States: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015e Production, bastnäsite concentrates — 3,000 5,500 5,400 4,100 Imports:2 Compounds: Cerium compounds 1,120 1,390 1,110 1,440 1,400 Other rare-earth compounds 6,020 3,400 7,330 9,400 9,700 Metals: Ferrocerium, alloys 186 276 313 371 360 Rare-earth metals, scandium, and yttrium 468 240 393 348 460 Exports:2 Compounds: Cerium compounds 1,640 996 734 608 600 Other rare-earth compounds 3,620 1,830 5,570 3,800 6,000 Metals: Ferrocerium, alloys 2,010 960 1,420 1,640 1,200 Rare-earth metals, scandium, and yttrium 3,030 2,080 1,050 140 60 Consumption, estimated 11,000 15,000 15,000 17,000 17,000 Price, dollars per kilogram, yearend:3 Cerium oxide, 99.5% minimum 40–45 10–12 5–6 4–5 2 Dysprosium oxide, 99.5% minimum 1,400–1,420
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Magnetic, Electropositive, and Chemical
    An Evaluation of the Behavioral Responses of Cownose Rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) to Permanent Magnets and Electropositive Alloys Completed by Robert A. Fisher Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary Eric M. Stroud and Michael M. Herrmann SharkDefense LLC Patrick H. Rice Consulting Marine Biologist VIMS Marine Resource Report No. 2006-12 VSG-06-14 December 2006 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 Overview of Repellent Technologies.................................................................................. 2 Magnetics ................................................................................................................ 2 Electropositive Alloys ............................................................................................. 5 Methods............................................................................................................................... 7 Experimental Design ............................................................................................... 7 Results Trial 1 – Control Swim Behavior ............................................................................ 9 Trial 2 – Controls.................................................................................................. 10 Trial 3 – Magnetic Treatment ............................................................................... 10 Trial 4 – Controls.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Argus Rare Earths Effective 07 April 2016 Argus Will Be
    Changes to Argus Rare Earths effective 07 April 2016 Argus will be updating categories for the following assessments in Argus Rare Earths with effect from 07 April 2016. PA-code Description Old category New category PA0014298 Cerium oxide 99.5-99.9% cif Europe ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Europe ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->Europe PA0014340 Neodymium metal 99% cif Europe ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Europe ->Rare earth metals->Neodymium->Europe PA0014341 Neodymium oxide 99.5-99.9% cif Europe ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Europe ->Rare earth metals->Neodymium->Europe PA0014365 Yttrium oxide 99.999% cif Europe ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Europe ->Rare earth metals->Yttrium->Europe PA0014378 Cerium carbonate min 45% REO ex-works China ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Asia-Pacific ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->China PA0014379 Cerium carbonate min 45% REO fob China ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Asia-Pacific ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->China PA0014380 Cerium metal min 99% ex-works China ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Asia-Pacific ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->China PA0014381 Cerium metal min 99% fob China ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Asia-Pacific ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->China PA0014382 Cerium oxide 99.5-99.9% ex-works China ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Asia-Pacific ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->China PA0014383 Cerium oxide 99.5-99.9% fob China ->Metals - Non-ferrous->Rare Earths->Asia-Pacific ->Rare earth metals->Cerium->China PA0014395 Dysprosium metal min 99% ex-works China
    [Show full text]