DOCSLIB.ORG

An Alternative Solution to the General Tautochrone Problem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Alternative Solution to the General Tautochrone Problem ENSENANZA˜ REVISTA MEXICANA DE FISICA´ E 54 (2) 212–215 DICIEMBRE 2008 An alternative solution to the general tautochrone problem R. Gomez´ and V. Marquina Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Av. Universidad 3000. Mexico´ D.F., 04510, Mexico,´ e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] S. Gomez-A´ ´ıza Escuela Nacional Preparatoria 6, Antonio Caso, Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Corina 3, Mexico,´ D.F., 04100 Mexico,´ e-mail: [email protected] Recibido el 3 de julio de 2008; aceptado el 2 de septiembre de 2008 In 1658, Blaise Pascal put forward a challenge for solving the area under a segment of a cycloid and also its center of gravity. In 1659, motivated by Pascal challenge, Huygens showed experimentally that the cycloid is the solution to the tautochrone problem, namely that of finding a curve such that the time taken by a particle sliding down to its lowest point, under uniform gravity, is independent of its starting point. Ever since, this problem has appeared in many books and papers that show different solutions. In particular, the fractional derivative formalism has been used to solve the problem for an arbitrary potential and also to put forward the inverse problem: what potential is needed in order for a particular trajectory to be a tautochrone? Unfortunately, the fractional derivative formalism is not a regular subject in the mathematics curricula for physics at most of the Universities we know. In this work we develop an approach that uses the well-known Laplace transform formalism together with the convolution theorem to arrive at similar results. Keywords: Tautochrone; Laplace transform; convolution theorem. En 1658, Blaise Pascal lanzo´ el reto de determinar el area´ debajo de la curva de un segmento de cicloide, as´ı como su centro de gravedad. En 1659, motivado por el reto de Pascal, Huygens demuestra experimentalmente que la cicloide es la solucion´ al problema de la tautocrona,´ es decir, al problema de encontrar una curva tal que, si una part´ıcula engarzada en ella se mueve por la accion´ del campo gravitacional uniforme, su tiempo de descenso es independiente de la posicion´ inicial. Desde entonces, este problema ha sido tratado en muchos libros y art´ıculos con diferentes soluciones. En particular, el formalismo de derivadas fraccionales ha sido utilizado para resolver el problema en el caso de un potencial arbitrario as´ı como el problema inverso: ¿que´ potencial se requiere para que una trayectoria, en particular, sea una tautocrona?´ Desafortunadamente, el formalismo de derivadas fraccionales no forma parte de la curr´ıcula de la carrera de F´ısica de muchas de las Universidades que conocemos. En este trabajo desarrollamos un calculo´ que utiliza el bien conocido formalismo de la transformada de Laplace, que junto con el teorema de convolucion,´ nos lleva a resultados similares. Descriptores: Tautocrona;´ transformada de Laplace; teorema de convolucion.´ PACS: 45.20.-d; 02.30.Uu 1. Introduction The problem has been, and still is, of interest, espe- cially because of its similarity with the brachistochrone prob- As stated in the abstract, Huygens showed experimentally lem [3-5]. Great mathematicians such as Joseph Louis La- that a cycloid is the tautochrone curve for a particle sliding grange and Leonhard Euler looked for an analytical solution without friction in the uniform gravitational field. He pub- to the problem and Niels H. Abel used the Laplace formalism lished this result in his book Horologium oscillatorium [1] to solve it [6]. Ever since, many papers have been published and some years later, when J. Bernoulli found that the cy- dealing with tautochrone curves under special physical con- cloid is also a brachistochrone, he wrote [2]: ditions, such as: the tautochrone with friction [7], the rela- tivistic tautochrone [8], the tautochrone in rotating frames of reference [9] and the tautochrone under an arbitrary poten- Before I end I must voice once more the admi- tial [10]. In this last paper, Flores and Osler introduced the ration I feel for the unexpected identity of Huy- fractional derivatives formalism to solve the problem and to gens’ tautochrone and my brachistochrone. I generalize to an arbitrary potential energy function, and also consider it especially remarkable that this coin- to solve the inverse problem. However, the fractional deriva- cidence can take place only under the hypothe- tive formalism is not a regular subject in the under graduate sis of Galileo, so that we even obtain from this syllabus of physics or mathematics studies. In this paper we a proof of its correctness. Nature always tends develop the same type of generalization, but using the more to act in the simplest way, and so it here lets accessible and well-known formalism of Laplace transform. one curve serve two different functions, while under any other hypothesis we should need two curves. AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION TO THE GENERAL TAUTOCHRONE PROBLEM 213 2. The Laplace transform formalism T), where the ending point has been taken, without lost of generality as y = 0, so that equation can be written as: Before we move toward the tautochrone problem, we shall ZT Zy=0 µ ¶ recall a pair of definitions and the convolution theorem [11]: p p dσ 2gdt = 2gT = ¡ (y ¡ y)¡1=2 dy 0 dy 1.- The Laplace transform f(s) of a function F (t) is de- 0 y=y0 fined as: Zy0 µ ¶ 1 ¡1=2 dσ Z = (y0 ¡ y) dy (7) ¡st dy f(s) = L fF (t)g = e F (t)dt (1) 0 0 For a tautochrone, the time of descent T is to be constant and the convolution between two functions as: independent of y0, so that the upper limit of Eq. (7) is ar- bitrary and this fact makes it possible to take the integrand Zt as the convolution of dσ=dy. The convolution theorem then F1(z)F2 (t ¡ z) dz = F1 ¤ F2 (2) states that p dσ 0 2gT = y¡1=2 ¤ ; (8) dy 2.- The convolution theorem: and calculating the corresponding Laplace transforms one If f1(s) and f2(s) are the Laplace transforms of F1(t) obtains ½ ¾ n o ½ ¾ r and F2(t), respectively, then p 1 dσ dσ ¼ 2gT = L L y¡1=2 = L (9) 8 9 s dy dy s <Zt = f1 (s) f2 (s) = L F1 (z) F2 (t ¡ z) dz because thep Laplace transform of a constant A is A/s and that : ; of y¡1=2 is ¼=s. Applying the inverse transform yields: 0 p dσ 2gT ¡1=2 = L (F1 ¤ F2) (3) = y (10) dy ¼ Squaring, separating variables, and integrating we arrive 3. The Laplace formalism in the Tautochrone at the parametric equations of a cycloid passing through the problem origin [11]. This is the usual method for solving the tau- tochrone in the homogeneous gravitational field. The same The path-time employed in a given trajectory defined by an method can be used to solve the general case, in which the arc element dσ potential energy function is arbitrary. We give the solution in q p p the next section. dσ= dx2 + dy2= 1 + (dx=dy)2dy= 1 + x02dy (4) with a velocity v 4. General case p v = (2=m)[U (y0) ¡ U (y)]; (5) In the general case for an arbitrary potential, we cannot use the convolution theorem because the left side of Eq. (6) does where m is the mass of the particle and U(y) is the potential not contain a term y0 ¡ y [as in Eq. (7)]. However, making energy function, can be written as: z = U(y) we can write Zt Z dσ dσ dz dσ dU 0 dσ dy= dy= dz and dz= dy = U dy (11) dt = ¡ dy dz dy dz dy v so then Eq. (6) takes the form t0 σ r T r z Zy Z Z µ ¶ dσ p 2 2 ¡1=2 dσ = ¡ (2=m)[U (y ) ¡ U (y)]dy; (6) dt= T =¡ (z0 ¡ z) dz (12) dy 0 m m dz 0 z0 y0 Under the isochronal condition, the left side of Eq. (12) the minus sign is because dσ=dt < 0. As stated before, the is a constant, so the right side does not depend on the integra- standard way to solve the problem using the Laplace formal- tion limits and we can apply the convolution theorem; then ism was put forward by Abel [6], and it can be seen, for in- (r ) r ½ ¾ 2 2 T n o dσ stance, in Arfken’s book [11]. However, we include it here L T = = L z¡1=2 L for the sake of completeness: m m s dz In the constant and uniform gravitational potential case, r ½ ¾ ¼ dσ U(y) =mgy, the last integral of Eq. (6) is from the top of = L (13) s dz the trajectory (y = y0, t= t0 = 0) to its bottom; (y = 0, t = Rev. Mex. F´ıs. E 54 (2) (2008) 212–215 214 R. GOMEZ,´ V. MARQUINA, AND S. GOMEZ-A´ IZA´ because thep Laplace transform of a constant A is A/s and that Proceeding as in the Cartesian coordinates case, we call of z¡1=2 is ¼=s. Solving for L fdσ=dzg we obtain: z = U(r) so that Ãr ! ½ ¾ r r Zz0 dσ 2 T ¼ 2 dσ (z) L = : (14) T = (z ¡ z)¡1=2 dz (23) dz m ¼ s m 0 dz z Applying the inverse transform, and substituting z = Repeating the previous steps one obtains: U(y), yields r r dσ 2 T dσ 2 T = z¡1=2: (24) = U ¡1=2 (15) dz m ¼ dU m ¼ So then so that r p r ZU Z 2 T 1=2 2 T σ = 2 U = B U (25) U 1=2dU = dσ; (16) m ¼ m ¼ and because 0 σ r U = 0 dσ dσ dr 1 dσ 2 T where is taken at the end point of the trajectory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineering Curves – I
    Engineering Curves – I 1. Classification 2. Conic sections - explanation 3. Common Definition 4. Ellipse – ( six methods of construction) 5. Parabola – ( Three methods of construction) 6. Hyperbola – ( Three methods of construction ) 7. Methods of drawing Tangents & Normals ( four cases) Engineering Curves – II 1. Classification 2. Definitions 3. Involutes - (five cases) 4. Cycloid 5. Trochoids – (Superior and Inferior) 6. Epic cycloid and Hypo - cycloid 7. Spiral (Two cases) 8. Helix – on cylinder & on cone 9. Methods of drawing Tangents and Normals (Three cases) ENGINEERING CURVES Part- I {Conic Sections} ELLIPSE PARABOLA HYPERBOLA 1.Concentric Circle Method 1.Rectangle Method 1.Rectangular Hyperbola (coordinates given) 2.Rectangle Method 2 Method of Tangents ( Triangle Method) 2 Rectangular Hyperbola 3.Oblong Method (P-V diagram - Equation given) 3.Basic Locus Method 4.Arcs of Circle Method (Directrix – focus) 3.Basic Locus Method (Directrix – focus) 5.Rhombus Metho 6.Basic Locus Method Methods of Drawing (Directrix – focus) Tangents & Normals To These Curves. CONIC SECTIONS ELLIPSE, PARABOLA AND HYPERBOLA ARE CALLED CONIC SECTIONS BECAUSE THESE CURVES APPEAR ON THE SURFACE OF A CONE WHEN IT IS CUT BY SOME TYPICAL CUTTING PLANES. OBSERVE ILLUSTRATIONS GIVEN BELOW.. Ellipse Section Plane Section Plane Hyperbola Through Generators Parallel to Axis. Section Plane Parallel to end generator. COMMON DEFINATION OF ELLIPSE, PARABOLA & HYPERBOLA: These are the loci of points moving in a plane such that the ratio of it’s distances from a fixed point And a fixed line always remains constant. The Ratio is called ECCENTRICITY. (E) A) For Ellipse E<1 B) For Parabola E=1 C) For Hyperbola E>1 Refer Problem nos.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Functions, Derivatives, and Notation 2 Remarks on Leibniz Notation
    ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS MATH 241 SPRING 2019 LECTURE NOTES M. P. COHEN CARLETON COLLEGE 1 Functions, Derivatives, and Notation A function, informally, is an input-output correspondence between values in a domain or input space, and values in a codomain or output space. When studying a particular function in this course, our domain will always be either a subset of the set of all real numbers, always denoted R, or a subset of n-dimensional Euclidean space, always denoted Rn. Formally, Rn is the set of all ordered n-tuples (x1; x2; :::; xn) where each of x1; x2; :::; xn is a real number. Our codomain will always be R, i.e. our functions under consideration will be real-valued. We will typically functions in two ways. If we wish to highlight the variable or input parameter, we will write a function using first a letter which represents the function, followed by one or more letters in parentheses which represent input variables. For example, we write f(x) or y(t) or F (x; y). In the first two examples above, we implicitly assume that the variables x and t vary over all possible inputs in the domain R, while in the third example we assume (x; y)p varies over all possible inputs in the domain R2. For some specific examples of functions, e.g. f(x) = x − 5, we assume that the domain includesp only real numbers x for which it makes sense to plug x into the formula, i.e., the domain of f(x) = x − 5 is just the interval [5; 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Cycloid: Tangents, Velocity Vector, Area, and Arc Length
    The Cycloid: Tangents, Velocity Vector, Area, and Arc Length [This is Chapter 2, section 13 of Historical Perspectives for the Reform of Mathematics Curriculum: Geometric Curve Drawing Devices and their Role in the Transition to an Algebraic Description of Functions; http://www.quadrivium.info/mathhistory/CurveDrawingDevices.pdf Interactive applets for the figures can also be found at Mathematical Intentions.] The circle is the curve with which we all have the most experience. It is an ancient symbol and a cultural icon in most human societies. It is also the one curve whose area, tangents, and arclengths are discussed in our mathematics curriculum without the use of calculus, and indeed long before students approach calculus. This discussion can take place, because most people have a lot of experience with circles, and know several ways to generate them. Pascal thought that, second only to the circle, the curve that he saw most in daily life was the cycloid (Bishop, 1936). Perhaps the large and slowly moving carriage wheels of the seventeenth century were more easily observed than those of our modern automobile, but the cycloid is still a curve that is readily generated and one in which many students of all ages easily take an interest. In a variety of settings, when I have mentioned, for example, the path of an ant riding on the side of a bicycle tire, some immediate interest has been sparked (see Figure 2.13a). Figure 2.13a The cycloid played an important role in the thinking of the seventeenth century. It was used in architecture and engineering (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 4-30-2018 The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics Michael Gulas [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Mathematics Commons, Ordinary Differential Equations and Applied Dynamics Commons, Other Applied Mathematics Commons, Partial Differential Equations Commons, and the Physics Commons Repository Citation Gulas, Michael, "The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics" (2018). Honors Projects. 343. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/343 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. The Pope’s Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics Michael Gulas Honors Project Submitted to the Honors College at Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with University Honors May 2018 Dr. Steven Seubert Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Advisor Dr. Marco Nardone Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Advisor Contents 1 Abstract 5 2 Classical Mechanics7 2.1 Brachistochrone....................................... 7 2.2 Laplace Transforms..................................... 10 2.2.1 Convolution..................................... 14 2.2.2 Laplace Transform Table.............................. 15 2.2.3 Inverse Laplace Transforms ............................ 15 2.3 Solving Differential Equations Using Laplace
    [Show full text]
  • The Tautochrone/Brachistochrone Problems: How to Make the Period of a Pendulum Independent of Its Amplitude
    The Tautochrone/Brachistochrone Problems: How to make the Period of a Pendulum independent of its Amplitude Tatsu Takeuchi∗ Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061, USA (Dated: October 12, 2019) Demo presentation at the 2019 Fall Meeting of the Chesapeake Section of the American Associa- tion of Physics Teachers (CSAAPT). I. THE TAUTOCHRONE A. The Period of a Simple Pendulum In introductory physics, we teach our students that a simple pendulum is a harmonic oscillator, and that its angular frequency ! and period T are given by s rg 2π ` ! = ;T = = 2π ; (1) ` ! g where ` is the length of the pendulum. This, of course, is not quite true. The period actually depends on the amplitude of the pendulum's swing. 1. The Small-Angle Approximation Recall that the equation of motion for a simple pendulum is d2θ g = − sin θ : (2) dt2 ` (Note that the equation of motion of a mass sliding frictionlessly along a semi-circular track of radius ` is the same. See FIG. 1.) FIG. 1. The motion of the bob of a simple pendulum (left) is the same as that of a mass sliding frictionlessly along a semi-circular track (right). The tension in the string (left) is simply replaced by the normal force from the track (right). ∗ [email protected] CSAAPT 2019 Fall Meeting Demo { Tatsu Takeuchi, Virginia Tech Department of Physics 2 We need to make the small-angle approximation sin θ ≈ θ ; (3) to render the equation into harmonic oscillator form: d2θ rg ≈ −!2θ ; ! = ; (4) dt2 ` so that it can be solved to yield θ(t) ≈ A sin(!t) ; (5) where we have assumed that pendulum bob is at θ = 0 at time t = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cycloid Scott Morrison
    The cycloid Scott Morrison “The time has come”, the old man said, “to talk of many things: Of tangents, cusps and evolutes, of curves and rolling rings, and why the cycloid’s tautochrone, and pendulums on strings.” October 1997 1 Everyone is well aware of the fact that pendulums are used to keep time in old clocks, and most would be aware that this is because even as the pendu- lum loses energy, and winds down, it still keeps time fairly well. It should be clear from the outset that a pendulum is basically an object moving back and forth tracing out a circle; hence, we can ignore the string or shaft, or whatever, that supports the bob, and only consider the circular motion of the bob, driven by gravity. It’s important to notice now that the angle the tangent to the circle makes with the horizontal is the same as the angle the line from the bob to the centre makes with the vertical. The force on the bob at any moment is propor- tional to the sine of the angle at which the bob is currently moving. The net force is also directed perpendicular to the string, that is, in the instantaneous direction of motion. Because this force only changes the angle of the bob, and not the radius of the movement (a pendulum bob is always the same distance from its fixed point), we can write: θθ&& ∝sin Now, if θ is always small, which means the pendulum isn’t moving much, then sinθθ≈. This is very useful, as it lets us claim: θθ&& ∝ which tells us we have simple harmonic motion going on.
    [Show full text]
  • Unity Via Diversity 81
    Unity via diversity 81 Unity via diversity Unity via diversity is a concept whose main idea is that every entity could be examined by different point of views. Many sources name this conception as interdisciplinarity . The mystery of interdisciplinarity is revealed when people realize that there is only one discipline! The division into multiple disciplines (or subjects) is just the human way to divide-and-understand Nature. Demonstrations of how informatics links real life and mathematics can be found everywhere. Let’s start with the bicycle – a well-know object liked by most students. Bicycles have light reflectors for safety reasons. Some of the reflectors are attached sideway on the wheels. Wheel reflector Reflectors notify approaching vehicles that there is a bicycle moving along or across the road. Even if the conditions prevent the driver from seeing the bicycle, the reflector is a sufficient indicator if the bicycle is moving or not, is close or far, is along the way or across it. Curve of the reflector of a rolling wheel When lit during the night, the wheel’s side reflectors create a beautiful luminous curve – a trochoid . 82 Appendix to Chapter 5 A trochoid curve is the locus of a fixed point as a circle rolls without slipping along a straight line. Depending on the position of the point a trochoid could be further classified as curtate cycloid (the point is internal to the circle), cycloid (the point is on the circle), and prolate cycloid (the point is outside the circle). Cycloid, curtate cycloid and prolate cycloid An interesting activity during the study of trochoids is to draw them using software tools.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of the Cycloid in Four Acts
    A Tale of the Cycloid In Four Acts Carlo Margio Figure 1: A point on a wheel tracing a cycloid, from a work by Pascal in 16589. Introduction In the words of Mersenne, a cycloid is “the curve traced in space by a point on a carriage wheel as it revolves, moving forward on the street surface.” 1 This deceptively simple curve has a large number of remarkable and unique properties from an integral ratio of its length to the radius of the generating circle, and an integral ratio of its enclosed area to the area of the generating circle, as can be proven using geometry or basic calculus, to the advanced and unique tautochrone and brachistochrone properties, that are best shown using the calculus of variations. Thrown in to this assortment, a cycloid is the only curve that is its own involute. Study of the cycloid can reinforce the curriculum concepts of curve parameterisation, length of a curve, and the area under a parametric curve. Being mechanically generated, the cycloid also lends itself to practical demonstrations that help visualise these abstract concepts. The history of the curve is as enthralling as the mathematics, and involves many of the great European mathematicians of the seventeenth century (See Appendix I “Mathematicians and Timeline”). Introducing the cycloid through the persons involved in its discovery, and the struggles they underwent to get credit for their insights, not only gives sequence and order to the cycloid’s properties and shows which properties required advances in mathematics, but it also gives a human face to the mathematicians involved and makes them seem less remote, despite their, at times, seemingly superhuman discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics, the Language of Watchmaking
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 90LEARNINGprovidedL by Infoscience E- École polytechniqueA fédérale de LausanneRNINGLEARNINGLEARNING Mathematics, the language of watchmaking Morley’s theorem (1898) states that if you trisect the angles of any triangle and extend the trisecting lines until they meet, the small triangle formed in the centre will always be equilateral. Ilan Vardi 1 I am often asked to explain mathematics; is it just about numbers and equations? The best answer that I’ve found is that mathematics uses numbers and equations like a language. However what distinguishes it from other subjects of thought – philosophy, for example – is that in maths com- plete understanding is sought, mostly by discover- ing the order in things. That is why we cannot have real maths without formal proofs and why mathe- maticians study very simple forms to make pro- found discoveries. One good example is the triangle, the simplest geometric shape that has been studied since antiquity. Nevertheless the foliot world had to wait 2,000 years for Morley’s theorem, one of the few mathematical results that can be expressed in a diagram. Horology is of interest to a mathematician because pallet verge it enables a complete understanding of how a watch or clock works. His job is to impose a sequence, just as a conductor controls an orches- tra or a computer’s real-time clock controls data regulating processing. Comprehension of a watch can be weight compared to a violin where science can only con- firm the preferences of its maker.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycloid Article(Final04)
    The Helen of Geometry John Martin The seventeenth century is one of the most exciting periods in the history of mathematics. The first half of the century saw the invention of analytic geometry and the discovery of new methods for finding tangents, areas, and volumes. These results set the stage for the development of the calculus during the second half. One curve played a central role in this drama and was used by nearly every mathematician of the time as an example for demonstrating new techniques. That curve was the cycloid. The cycloid is the curve traced out by a point on the circumference of a circle, called the generating circle, which rolls along a straight line without slipping (see Figure 1). It has been called it the “Helen of Geometry,” not just because of its many beautiful properties but also for the conflicts it engendered. Figure 1. The cycloid. This article recounts the history of the cycloid, showing how it inspired a generation of great mathematicians to create some outstanding mathematics. This is also a story of how pride, pettiness, and jealousy led to bitter disagreements among those men. Early history Since the wheel was invented around 3000 B.C., it seems that the cycloid might have been discovered at an early date. There is no evidence that this was the case. The earliest mention of a curve generated by a -1-(Final) point on a moving circle appears in 1501, when Charles de Bouvelles [7] used such a curve in his mechanical solution to the problem of squaring the circle.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE NOTES (SPRING 2012) 119B: ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS June 12, 2012 Contents Part 1. Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Mech
    LECTURE NOTES (SPRING 2012) 119B: ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS DAN ROMIK DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, UC DAVIS June 12, 2012 Contents Part 1. Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics 2 Part 2. Discrete-time dynamics, chaos and ergodic theory 44 Part 3. Control theory 66 Bibliographic notes 87 1 2 Part 1. Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics 1.1. Introduction. Newton made the famous discovery that the mo- tion of physical bodies can be described by a second-order differential equation F = ma; where a is the acceleration (the second derivative of the position of the body), m is the mass, and F is the force, which has to be specified in order for the motion to be determined (for example, Newton's law of gravity gives a formula for the force F arising out of the gravitational influence of celestial bodies). The quantities F and a are vectors, but in simple problems where the motion is along only one axis can be taken as scalars. In the 18th and 19th centuries it was realized that Newton's equa- tions can be reformulated in two surprising ways. The new formula- tions, known as Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, make it eas- ier to analyze the behavior of certain mechanical systems, and also highlight important theoretical aspects of the behavior of such sys- tems which are not immediately apparent from the original Newtonian formulation. They also gave rise to an entirely new and highly use- ful branch of mathematics called the calculus of variations|a kind of \calculus on steroids" (see Section 1.10). Our goal in this chapter is to give an introduction to this deep and beautiful part of the theory of differential equations.
    [Show full text]
  • RETURN of the PLANE EVOLUTE 1. Short Historical Account As We
    RETURN OF THE PLANE EVOLUTE RAGNI PIENE, CORDIAN RIENER, AND BORIS SHAPIRO “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.” Isaac Newton, from a letter to Robert Hooke Abstract. Below we consider the evolutes of plane real-algebraic curves and discuss some of their complex and real-algebraic properties. In particular, for a given degree d 2, we provide ≥ lower bounds for the following four numerical invariants: 1) the maximal number of times a real line can intersect the evolute of a real-algebraic curve of degree d;2)themaximalnumberofreal cusps which can occur on the evolute of a real-algebraic curve of degree d;3)themaximalnumber of (cru)nodes which can occur on the dual curve to the evolute of a real-algebraic curve of degree d;4)themaximalnumberof(cru)nodeswhichcanoccurontheevoluteofareal-algebraiccurve of degree d. 1. Short historical account As we usually tell our students in calculus classes, the evolute of a curve in the Euclidean plane is the locus of its centers of curvature. The following intriguing information about evolutes can be found on Wikipedia [35]: “Apollonius (c. 200 BC) discussed evolutes in Book V of his treatise Conics. However, Huygens is sometimes credited with being the first to study them, see [17]. Huygens formulated his theory of evolutes sometime around 1659 to help solve the problem of finding the tautochrone curve, which in turn helped him construct an isochronous pendulum. This was because the tautochrone curve is a cycloid, and cycloids have the unique property that their evolute is a cycloid of the same type.
    [Show full text]