Drugs-Induced Pathological Gambling: an Analysis of Italian Spontaneous Reporting System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Gambling Studies https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09828-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Drugs‑Induced Pathological Gambling: An Analysis of Italian Spontaneous Reporting System Cristina Scavone1 · Barbara Stelitano1 · Concetta Rafaniello1 · Francesco Rossi1 · Liberata Sportiello1 · Annalisa Capuano1 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Pathological gambling has been reported as a direct complication of Parkinson’s disease and its pharmacological treatment based on dopamine agonists. Moreover, further medica- tions (not dopamine agonists) were associated to the occurrence of gambling disorder. We aim to analyze the spontaneous reports of gambling disorder on the whole Italian terri- tory with a focus on Campania Region (Southern Italy) from January 1st 2002 to July 31st 2018. We analyzed gambling disorder’s reports across the 2002–2018 period in the Italian spontaneous reporting database (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza—RNF), with a focus on Campania region. 94 suspected cases of gambling disorder associated to apomorphine, aripiprazole, cabergoline, levodopa, levodopa and derivatives in association with entaca- pone/benserazide and carbidopa, pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine were reported into the RNF. Of these cases, two related to pramipexole and one to aripiprazole were sent to Campania Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre. Although it is widely recog- nized that dopamine agonists may induce behavioral disorders, Parkinson’s disease is itself associated to pathological gambling, compulsive shopping and eating. Since our results could not clarify the correlation between Parkinson’s disease, its pharmacological treat- ment and pathological gambling, in order to better defne this correlation there is a need to conduct further ad hoc observational studies. Keywords Pathological gambling · Pharmacovigilance · Italian spontaneous reporting system · RNF Liberata Sportiello, Annalisa Capuano both are lead authors. * Cristina Scavone [email protected] 1 Department of Experimental Medicine Section of Pharmacology “L. Donatelli”, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Via Costantinopoli 16, 80138 Naples, Italy Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Journal of Gambling Studies Introduction During the last few years, the availability of legal gambling has abruptly increased lead- ing to a huge intensifcation in pathological gambling (Potenza et al. 2002). Among European countries, Italy holds the absolute record for gambling related receipt. In 2016 the gaming sector has brought almost 10 billion euros, equal to 0.6% of the Italian gross domestic product (Fisco, entrate record dal gioco d’azzardo: in Europa nessuno come noi. Available at: http://www.today .it/econo mia/getti to-fsca le-gioch i-scomm esse-itali a-dati.html). According to the ffth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM- 5), gambling disorder is defned as a persistent and recurrent behavior leading to clini- cally signifcant impairment or distress. Patients afected by gambling disorder present at least four of the following attitudes or feelings: they need to gamble with increasing amounts of money; they present restlessness or irritability when stop or reduce gam- bling; they have made several failed eforts to control or stop gambling; they are wor- ried about gambling; they gamble during anxious or depressed situations; they gamble despite loss of money; they lie about the extent of involvement with gambling; they usu- ally lost any relationship, job, or career opportunity due to gambling; they rely on others to provide money (DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria: Gambling Disorder. Available at: http:// www.ncpga mblin g.org/wp-conte nt/uploa ds/2014/08/DSM-5-Diagn ostic -Crite ria-Gambl ing-Disor der.pdf). Several risk factors have been identifed in inducing gambling disor- ders, including biological ones, such as changes in dopamine and serotonin neurotrans- mission, genetic, psychological and social factors (Fong 2005; Comings et al. 1996). In recent years, pathological gambling has also been reported as a direct complication of Parkinson’s disease and its pharmacological treatment based on dopamine agonists (Seedat et al. 2000; Weintraub and Claassen 2017). Following an evaluation performed by the EU Pharmacovigilance Working Party, the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) released a public statement in which announced an increased risk of impulse control disorders, including pathological gambling, increased libido, compulsive buying and eating, in patients treated with dopamine agonists for Parkinson’s disease, restless legs syndrome and endocrine disorders (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Importanti informazi- oni sulla sicurezza riguardanti i farmaci dopamino agonisti. Available at: http://www. agenz iafar maco.gov.it/wscs_rende r_attac hment _by_id/111.71353 .11724 88155 7268b 10.pdf?id=111.71359 .11724 88156 158; PhVWP monthly report on safety concerns, guidelines and general matters. http://www.ema.europ a.eu/docs/en_GB/docum ent_libra ry/Repor t/2012/07/WC500 13039 1.pdf). On the basis of new evidence, sections “Special warnings and precautions for use” and “Adverse efects” of the Summary of product Characteristics (SPCs) of apomorphine, bromocriptine, cabergoline, alpha-dihydroer- gocryptine, lisuride, pergolide, piribedil, pramipexole, quinagolide, ropinirole, levodopa and derivatives in association with entacapone/benserazide and carbidopa, were modi- fed highlighting the new risk of impulse control disorders (Peterson and Forlano 2017; Mété et al. 2016). Moreover, further medications, including aripiprazole, modafnil, rotigotine, sertraline, citalopram, and lamotrigine, were associated to the occurrence of gambling disorder (George et al. 2015; Schreglmann et al. 2012; Ramasubbu 2004). Given the clinical relevance of pathological gambling, the safety warning issued by European regulatory agencies about the increased risk of this adverse drug reaction (ADR) in patients treated with dopamine agonists and the literature data that suggested the same risk also with further medications, we aim to analyze the spontaneous reports 1 3 Journal of Gambling Studies of gambling disorder on the whole Italian territory with a focus on Campania Region from January 1st 2002 to July 31st 2018. Methods Data Source The Italian Pharmacovigilance System is coordinated by the AIFA, that established in 2001 a National Pharmacovigilance Network (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza, RNF) for the collection of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). The AIFA works in collaboration with Pharmacovigilance Regional Centers (Mazzitello et al. 2013), which are involved in the evalu- ation of ICSRs, in terms of quality of data, evaluation of causality assessment for each drug- vaccine/ADR couple, and participation to signal analysis on drugs and vaccines. In accordance with Italian pharmacovigilance regulations, ICSRs entry into the RNF at national level can be shared only as pooled data through the RAM system, while ICSRs entry into the RNF at regional level are accessible to the Pharmacovigilance Regional Center of competence directly through the RNF. Information are more refned in the latter case. For the purpose of this study, we retrieved from the RAM system (for Italian safety data) and the RNF (for regional safety data) all ICSRs that reported gambling disorder as ADR and apomorphine, bromocriptine, cabergoline, alpha-dihydroergocryptine, lisuride, pergolide, pir- ibedil, pramipexole, quinagolide, ropinirole, levodopa and derivatives in association with enta- capone/benserazide and carbidopa, aripiprazole, modafnil, rotigotine, sertraline, citalopram or lamotrigine as the suspected drug. Descriptive Analysis and Case‑Series All ICSRs, reported from January 1st 2002 to July 31st 2018, that described the occurrence of gambling disorder related to the previous mentioned suspected drugs were selected. For ICSRs reported on the whole Italian territory we performed a descriptive analysis in terms of number of gambling disorder’s reports. For ICSRs reported in Campania region, we performed a descriptive analysis of gambling disorder’s reports, stratifying by suspected drug (s), concomitant drug (s), age, gender, seriousness and outcome degrees, and causality assess- ment. Regarding to the seriousness degree, ADRs are classifed as serious, when they induce death, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, severe or permanent disability, life- threat, congenital abnormalities/birth defcits, or if they were considered clinically relevant, or not serious. The outcome is categorized as: completely resolved, resolved with sequelae, improved, unchanged and unavailable (Sessa et al. 2016a, b). The causality assessment was performed through Naranjo algorithm (Naranjo et al. 1981; Mascolo et al. 2017) in order to establish the strength of relationship between the drug and the ADR. All scores ranged between possible and certain reports were considered reasonable for causality. Compliance with Ethical Standards Safety data deriving from the Italian spontaneous reporting system are anonymous and in compliance with ethical standard. Therefore, no further ethical measures were required. 1 3 Journal of Gambling Studies Results Gambling Disorder in Italy From January 1st 2002 to July 31st 2018, 94 suspected cases of gambling disorder asso- ciated to apomorphine, aripiprazole, cabergoline, levodopa, levodopa and derivatives in association with entacapone/benserazide and carbidopa, pergolide, pramipexole, ropin-