PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
House of Commons Debates VOLUME 148 Ï NUMBER 042 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, April 19, 2016 Speaker: The Honourable Geoff Regan CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2395 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, April 19, 2016 The House met at 10 a.m. builder and that would have the abolition of nuclear weapons as a top priority. PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED DYING Prayer Mr. Richard Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the second petition is with regard to physician- assisted suicide. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS The petitioners call upon the House of Commons to allow Ï (1005) sufficient time for broad and timely consultations on this issue and [English] that any legislation passed be stringent and serve to minimize the occurrence of physician-assisted dying. They also call for the PETITIONS legislation to accommodate medical professionals who choose to CBC/RADIO-CANADA refuse to participate in this program. Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP): Mr. Speaker, *** it is an honour today to rise to present two petitions. QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER The first petition is from residents throughout my community of Saanich—Gulf Islands, and it is one that is shared widely across Mrs. Celina Caesar-Chavannes (Parliamentary Secretary to Canada. The petitioners urge the government to restore the funding the Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I ask that all questions be and to create predictable, long-term, stable funding for the nation's allowed to stand. public broadcaster, the CBC and Radio-Canada. I note that progress was made in this direction in the last budget. The Speaker: Is that agreed? ANIMAL WELFARE Some hon. members: Agreed. Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP): Mr. Speaker, the second petition is also from residents of my community, as well as from a number of petitioners from Calgary. The petitioners call upon the government to recognize animals as GOVERNMENT ORDERS beings that can feel pain. They urge the government to move animal [English] cruelty crimes from the property section of the Criminal Code and strengthen language in federal legislation. A private member's bill BUSINESS OF SUPPLY currently before the House would help in this direction. OPPOSITION MOTION—POLITICAL FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES VOLUNTEER SERVICE MEDAL Mr. Lloyd Longfield (Guelph, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased Mr. Michael Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton, CPC) moved: to table a petition signed by constituents in my riding of Guelph That the House urge the Minister of Justice to: regarding the creation of a Canadian military volunteer service medal. (a) follow her government’s own guidelines for Ministers and Ministers of State as described in Annex B of Open and Accountable Government 2015, that NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT “Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries must ensure that political fundraising activities or considerations do not affect, or appear to affect, the exercise of their Mr. Richard Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay, official duties or the access of individuals or organizations to government”; that NDP): Mr. Speaker, I rise this morning to present two petitions from “There should be no preferential access to government, or appearance of preferential access, accorded to individuals or organizations because they have my constituents. made financial contributions to politicians and political parties”; and that “There should be no singling out, or appearance of singling out, of individuals or The first petition calls upon Parliament to establish a department organizations as targets of political fundraising because they have official dealings of peace that would reinvigorate Canada's role as a global peace with Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries, or their staff or departments”; 2396 COMMONS DEBATES April 19, 2016 Business of Supply He said: Mr. Speaker, it is with disappointment that I rise today to is only one way to characterize this type of fundraising. It is called speak to this matter. It is never a good day when a minister of the “pay-to-play” fundraising. What the minister did was attend and crown breaches ethical standards which the minister is bound by. It is participate in a pay-to-play fundraiser. particularly disappointing when that minister of the crown is the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, someone who is bound by the highest ethical standards. It gets worse. It was not only a pay-to-play fundraiser that anyone could attend. Rather, it was targeted to a select group of elite Bay As Minister of Justice and Attorney General, the minister must not Street lawyers to pay in return for access to the Minister of Justice to only at all times act with the highest degree of integrity, the Minister talk about issues that pertain specifically to her responsibilities. of Justice must also be seen to at all times act with the highest degree of integrity. Mr. Speaker, the role of the Minister of Justice and Attorney Then there was the location of the fundraiser, which was Torys General is an important role. It is a unique role, and in that role a LLP, a law firm which has extensive legal dealings with the federal special trust is placed in the minister. We are here today to debate government. Not only does it deal extensively with the federal this matter because the Minister of Justice and Attorney General has government, lobbying of the federal government is one of the core broken that trust. services that Torys LLP provides to its clients. Also, amongst its most senior partners and senior lobbyists, happened to be an It was not long ago, in fact it was indeed only in November of individual who was registered to lobby the Minister of Justice up 2015, that the Prime Minister, with great fanfare, unveiled “Open until the eve of the fundraiser. and Accountable Government”, the ethical guidelines for which ministers and parliamentary secretaries in the government are bound. So much for the Prime Minister's ethics code, which states that The Prime Minister, in his opening letter contained in “Open and ministers shall not raise funds from department stakeholders and Accountable Government”, said it is not just a matter of adopting the lobbyists. Certainly, the Minister of Justice disregarded that part of right rules and seeing that those rules are complied with on a the Prime Minister's ethics code. technical basis. Rather, he said that ministers in his government would be held to a higher standard; indeed they would be held to the highest standard of honesty, integrity, openness, and accountability. Let us take a step back and look at what we are dealing with. We Today we will learn whether the Prime Minister meant what he said have a Minister of Justice, who has broad authority and power over and said what he meant, or whether those words, like so many words legal matters concerning the federal government, attending a of the Prime Minister, are merely hollow words with no meaning at fundraiser at which attendees were invited to pay in return for the all. opportunity to engage the minister on matters that pertain directly to The Prime Minister's ethics code states that ministers shall ensure the minister's responsibilities. It was targeted to a select group of Bay that political and fundraising advertising clearly separates fundrais- Street lawyers, hosted at a law firm with extensive legal dealings ing from department responsibilities. Consistent with that, the Prime with the federal government, including the minister's own depart- Minister's ethics code provides that ministers shall not engage and ment, and which counted as one of its most senior lobbyists someone converse on matters related to their ministerial responsibilities at who up until the eve of the fundraiser was registered to lobby the fundraisers. Despite those rules, this particular fundraiser was billed minister herself. That is what we are dealing with. It stinks. That is as a fundraiser with the Minister of Justice; it was not the hon. what it does. member for Vancouver Granville, despite the very clear guidelines from the Prime Minister that provide that ministers must separate their ministerial duties from fundraising. Ï (1015) Admittedly, if that was all it was, a situation where the event had been advertised as a fundraiser with the Minister of Justice as What is very clear is that the minister broke the Prime Minister's opposed to the hon. member for Vancouver Granville, it would be ethics code by failing to ensure that fundraising advertising did not fair to say that it was a breach of the Prime Minister's ethics code, mix fundraising with her responsibilities as minister. The minister but a minor breach, a technical breach, something that might be broke the Prime Minister's ethics code by raising funds from attributable to sloppiness, that certainly should not be repeated in the department stakeholders. The Minister of Justice broke the ethics future, but something that would not require any further action. code by failing to sufficiently separate her duties as Minister of Justice with Liberal Party fundraising activities; and the Minister of Ï (1010) Justice broke the Prime Minister's ethics code by giving at least the However, that is not what happened. What happened was far more appearance of preferential access to government. serious. It was not only advertised as a fundraiser with the Minister of Justice, but as an opportunity for those who paid $500 to engage the minister on matters pertaining specifically to her responsibilities These are not technical breaches of the Prime Minister's ethics as the minister. If people wanted to talk about medical marijuana, code; these are substantial breaches of the Prime Minister's ethics physician-assisted dying legislation, or missing and murdered code; these are multiple substantial breaches of the Prime Minister's indigenous women, they could pay $500 for that opportunity.