DOCSLIB.ORG

St George's Barracks, Rutland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St George's Barracks, Rutland ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS, RUTLAND EVOLVING MASTERPLAN - PHASE II NOVEMBER 2018 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 6.0 Consultation & engagement 45 Purpose of the document 5 Feedback 48 Process 5 7.0 Recommendations for masterplan development 51 2.0 Overall vision 7 8.0 Revised evolving masterplan 53 3.0 Policy context 9 Rationale 53 Solving the housing crisis 9 Revised evolving masterplan 54 Garden village principles 10 Transport 55 Healthy new towns 11 Utilities 58 Dementia friendly communities 11 Land use 58 National policy 12 Scale 59 Local policy 12 Affordability 60 Employment & job creation 60 4.0 Placemaking 13 Landscape 61 Ecology 62 The approach 13 Drainage 63 Life: The Rutland community 13 Tourism & leisure 65 Spaces: The strength of place 16 Sustainable design & construction 66 Buildings: Architecture & materiality 20 Land value capture 68 St George’s Barracks: Then & now 21 Long-term stewardship 68 Response to opportunities & constraints 36 9.0 Character 69 5.0 A Community for life 37 General design principles 70 The need for homes in Rutland 37 Aspirations 38 10.0 Phasing & delivery 71 Density 40 Options originally considered 41 Initial concept (May 2018) 43 Initial mix of uses 44 PROJECT NUMBER: D2581 ALL PLANS IN THIS REPORT ARE REPRODUCED FROM ORDNANCE SURVEY DIGITAL MAP VERSION: E DATA © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LICENCE NUMBER 100022432. VERSION DATE: 27.11.18 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY UK MOD CROWN COPYRIGHT DIO 2018. CROWN COPYRIGHT AND COMMENT: FINAL REPORT DATABASE RIGHT 2018, ORDNANCE SURVEY 100023818 ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 3 SITE BOUNDARY 4 ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT The document is structured as follows: PROCESS In November 2016, the Government announced through ‘A • Section 1: Introduction - sets out the purpose, structure For the creation of any new residential development to be Better Defence Estate’, a commitment to invest in a more and process involved in preparing the evolving masterplan successful, the process has to start with people. As such, efficient built military estate that will reduce in size by thirty per • Section 2:Vision - presents the overall vision for the the design team has sought to build upon the strong lines cent by 2040. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) is required to redevelopment of St George’s Barracks of communication and engagement already commenced by maximise value through the disposal of sites and has a target Rutland County Council. The design process has subsequently to provide land for 55,000 dwellings during this Parliament. • Section 3: Policy context - provides the planning policy built a strong team of collaborators, a new partnership, where Within the November announcement, it was confirmed that St background to the project on a national, regional and local the longer-term thinking and vision required to create a George’s Barracks in Rutland would be surplus to operational level successful community is shaped and tested. requirements and programmed for disposal in 2020. • Section 4: Placemaking - provides an analysis of the existing situation, culminating in an opportunities and Such engagement leads to better informed placemaking In recognition of this, Rutland County Council (RCC) and the constraints plan to guide the development of the evolving decisions, and ultimately the delivery of places where a new MOD have agreed a Memorandum of Understanding that masterplan community’s quality of life get increasingly better over time. builds upon their willingness to jointly explore the opportunities for the future of the St George’s Barracks site post 2020/21 • Section 5: A community for life - presents the initial Based on Jan Gehl’s philosophy of ‘First life, then spaces then and an appetite to work together in a new and innovative way options considered and the first version of the masterplan, buildings. The other way around never works’, the following to deliver Government growth and efficiency objectives for the which was consulted on in May 2018 approach has been undertaken at St George’s Barracks: site, and ensure that the development is sustainable and right • Section 6: Consultation & engagement - provides an for Rutland. outline of the consultation and engagement activities that • Life – a vision and programme of activities have been were undertaken between November 2017 and June 2018, formulated, based on the type of life (activities and Rutland’s latest Local Plan is formed by the adopted Core including a comprehensive summary of the feedback that attractions) that are inherent in Rutland Strategy Development Plan Document (DPD - adopted July was received • Space - a public space network has been proposed that can 2011) and the Site Allocation and Policies DPD (adopted support the proposed community through scale, form and October 2014) and Minerals Core Strategy and Development • Section 7: Recommendations for masterplan climate Control Policies (adopted October 2010). This covers the plan development - presents recommendations for the next period of 2011 to 2026. A new Local Plan is being prepared to iteration of the evolving masterplan, to address the feedback • Buildings – how buildings can contribute to public life replace the adopted documents. Consultation on a draft Local that was received during the consultation process aspirations has been envisioned, in terms of height, Plan took place last summer, however this draft was prepared • Section 8: Revised evolving masterplan - presents massing and scale, as well as functionality and interaction. before any significant work had taken place in relation to St the revised version of the evolving masterplan prepared George’s Barracks. As a result, the Local Plan did not take the in November 2018, which takes account of the Throughout the process, community engagement has been site into consideration. recommendations in section 7 used to inform and test design evolution and has resulted in a series of recommendations on how the masterplan should be This document builds on the work undertaken in phase I of • Section 9: Character - provides initial thoughts on the refined as it is developed in more detail. the evolving masterplan by further exploring and refining character of the new community the potential redevelopment of St George’s Barracks. It is • Section 10: Phasing & delivery - outlines the potential The design process commences with sensing and seeing – intended to provide the evidence base required to support phasing strategy. understanding the physical, political, fiscal and visual context. the inclusion of a policy framework for the future of St This baseline informs constraints and opportunities, and when George’s Barracks within RCC’s new Local Plan, which aligned to the vision allows concepts for the new garden village would provide the planning policy background to any future to be nurtured. planning applications for St George’s Barracks. The document provides a summary of the concerns raised during public and stakeholder consultation in May and June 2018 and presents a subsequent iteration of the masterplan, which takes account of the recommendations for revisions to the proposals which arose as part of the consultation. IMAGES OF RUTLAND ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 5 6 ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 2.0 OVERALL VISION The regeneration of St George’s Barracks will result in a new ‘Community for Life’, a place where its residents live and work. It will be designed in accordance with the principles of a garden village and the regeneration will take a ‘whole life, whole site’ approach. The community will be one that carefully evolves through its relationship with Edith Weston, North Luffenham, Normanton and Rutland Water, and will have its own identity drawn from the character of Rutland. It will be planned to enhance the existing landscape and undulating topography, and will have a distinct and complementary relationship with the land beyond its boundaries. There will be an easily accessible, walkable and permeable network of streets, paths and cycle ways, which gives priority to pedestrians and cyclists and provides convenient routes for public transport, whilst providing adequate space for parking. This network will be fully integrated with a diverse pattern of formal and informal green spaces, waterbodies and other public spaces, that will serve their surrounding areas and support a varied ecology, whilst encouraging healthy lifestyles. There will be a range of house types, with varying densities and tenures, gathered into mixed, identifiable and affordable neighbourhoods. A range of employment opportunities and educational, community, retail and recreational uses will be distributed in locations that best serve demand and their function, add variety and provide distinctive landmarks throughout the new community. Infrastructure will be embedded to attract the self-employed, start-ups and home-working, and encourage enterprise. A thriving and economically active community will enable people to live and work in the same place, attracting a younger, working- age population and addressing the imbalance of the current aging population. A broad range and quality of facilities will be designed to complement, rather than compete with, those available in Oakham and Uppingham. ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS WILL BE TRANSFORMED INTO A VIBRANT AND ATTRACTIVE NEW COMMUNITY The design of the landscape, streets, paths and buildings will be considered as a whole, and will draw their character from the typical landscape, settlements and buildings of Rutland. The design will establish a low energy-consumption environment, lifestyle and built form, and will adapt to new and emerging technologies and lifestyle changes. The masterplan vision will be sufficiently flexible to respond to changes in demand and the economy, whilst providing certainty and control over delivery of the scheme. The quality and consistency of the area will be controlled for the lifetime of the development through design codes. ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 7 8 ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 3.0 POLICY CONTEXT SOLVING THE HOUSING CRISIS Under this current model, a free market in land for housing THE SOLUTION does not exist.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Douglas Missile & Space Systems Division
    ·, THE THOR HISTORY. MAY 1963 DOUGLAS REPORT SM-41860 APPROVED BY: W.H.. HOOPER CHIEF, THOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DOUGLAS MISSILE & SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION ABSTRACT This history is intended as a quick orientation source and as n ready-reference for review of the Thor and its sys­ tems. The report briefly states the development of Thor, sur'lli-:arizes and chronicles Thor missile and booster launch­ inGs, provides illustrations and descriptions of the vehicle systcn1s, relates their genealogy, explains sane of the per­ fon:iance capabilities of the Thor and Thor-based vehicles used, and focuses attention to the exploration of space by Douelas Aircraf't Company, Inc. (DAC). iii PREFACE The purpose of The Thor History is to survey the launch record of the Thor Weapon, Special Weapon, and Space Systems; give a systematic account of the major events; and review Thor's participation in the military and space programs of this nation. The period covered is from December 27, 1955, the date of the first contract award, through May, 1963. V �LE OF CONTENTS Page Contract'Award . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l Basic Or�anization and Objectives • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Basic Developmenta� Philosophy . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 Early Research and Development Launches • • • ·• • • • • • • • • • 4 Transition to ICBM with Space Capabilities--Multi-Stage Vehicles . 6 Initial Lunar and Space Probes ••••••• • • • • • • •
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Significance St George’S Barracks, Rutland
    STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS, RUTLAND Heritage Fellows, Peter [email protected] St George’s Barracks Statement of Significance Contents Chapter Title Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Site Description 3 3. Methodology 3 4. Legislation and Planning Policy Context 4 5. Understanding 5 6. Assessment of Significance 11 7. Opportunities 17 8. Conclusion 18 9. Bibliography 19 1 St George’s Barracks Statement of Significance 1.0 Introduction This report has been prepared by Peter Fellows, Built Heritage Consultant at RegenCo, on behalf of Rutland County Council and the DIO, in order to assess the significance of the historic built environment at St George’s Barracks, Rutland. There are no World Heritage Sites, Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Historic Landscapes, Parks and Gardens or Historic Battlefields within the proposed application site. Within the 1km study area surrounding the application site, the following heritage assets have been identified: • Edith Weston Conservation Area • North Luffenham Conservation Area • 22 post-medieval and Industrial era listed buildings (the majority of which are within North Luffenham) • 1 modern listed building (Thor Missile base) The area also forms part of the Second World War airfield, which is a non-designated heritage asset included on the Leicestershire and Rutland HER (MLE15972). 1.1 Aims and Objectives The aim of this Heritage Statement is to describe the significance of built heritage assets affected by the proposed development and assess the impacts of the proposal upon their significance, including their settings, as required by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The objectives of this Heritage Statement are: - Identify and describe the significance of designated and non-designated built heritage assets affected by the proposed development, including the contribution of their settings to their significance; and - Assess the impacts of the proposed development upon their significance, including their settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Kecksburg UFO a GE Mark 2 Reentry Vehicle?
    Has a Top 5 UFO Case Been Solved? Was the Kecksburg UFO a GE Mark 2 Reentry Vehicle? By John Ventre and Owen Eichler On December 9, 1965 at 4:47 pm, something navigated through our airspace and made a semi controlled landing in Kecksburg Pennsylvania. For me, the entire story has been about how it made a left turn near Cleveland and a right turn near Kecksburg and slowed down before minimally “crash” landing in rural Kecksburg and avoiding population centers (like Flight 93). The legend has grown to include one witness who saw a scaly, three fingered hand come out of the top of the UFO, similar to the ending of the 1953 movie “War of the Worlds”, to seeing an alien body on a gurney at Hangar 18 at Wright Patterson Air Force base alongside a cone shaped craft. I was contacted in February 2015 by Owen Eichler in regards to his theory that the December 9, 1965 Kecksburg UFO incident was potentially a crash and retrieval of a GE Mark 2 reentry vehicle (RV) launched on December 7, 1965. Owen said he has spent ten years researching his theory and believes he is correct. The GE Mark 2 RV has never been mentioned as a possible candidate for Kecksburg. This object was a spy capsule that was kept secret until 1991. I posed a few questions that were significant to the case: 1. How did the object turn, slow down and perform a controlled landing? Owen said the GE reentry vehicle had four control jets and an internal weighting control system for stability and guidance using the coanda effect to glide.
    [Show full text]
  • Raaf Personnel Serving on Attachment in Royal Air Force Squadrons and Support Units
    Cover Design by: 121Creative Lower Ground Floor, Ethos House, 28-36 Ainslie Pl, Canberra ACT 2601 phone. (02) 6243 6012 email. [email protected] www.121creative.com.au Printed by: Kwik Kopy Canberra Lower Ground Floor, Ethos House, 28-36 Ainslie Pl, Canberra ACT 2601 phone. (02) 6243 6066 email. [email protected] www.canberra.kwikkopy.com.au Compilation Alan Storr 2006 The information appearing in this compilation is derived from the collections of the Australian War Memorial and the National Archives of Australia. Author : Alan Storr Alan was born in Melbourne Australia in 1921. He joined the RAAF in October 1941 and served in the Pacific theatre of war. He was an Observer and did a tour of operations with No 7 Squadron RAAF (Beauforts), and later was Flight Navigation Officer of No 201 Flight RAAF (Liberators). He was discharged Flight Lieutenant in February 1946. He has spent most of his Public Service working life in Canberra – first arriving in the National Capital in 1938. He held senior positions in the Department of Air (First Assistant Secretary) and the Department of Defence (Senior Assistant Secretary), and retired from the public service in 1975. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree (Melbourne University) and was a graduate of the Australian Staff College, ‘Manyung’, Mt Eliza, Victoria. He has been a volunteer at the Australian War Memorial for 21 years doing research into aircraft relics held at the AWM, and more recently research work into RAAF World War 2 fatalities. He has written and published eight books on RAAF fatalities in the eight RAAF Squadrons serving in RAF Bomber Command in WW2.
    [Show full text]
  • St George's Barracks, Rutland
    ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS, RUTLAND EVOLVING MASTERPLAN PHASE II NOVEMBER 2018 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 6.0 Consultation & engagement 45 Purpose of the document 5 Feedback 48 Process 5 7.0 Recommendations for masterplan development 51 2.0 Overall vision 7 8.0 Revised evolving masterplan 53 3.0 Policy context 9 Rationale 53 Solving the housing crisis 9 Revised evolving masterplan 54 Garden village principles 10 Transport 55 Healthy new towns 11 Utilities 58 Dementia friendly communities 11 Land use 58 National policy 12 Scale 59 Local policy 12 Affordability 60 Employment & job creation 60 4.0 Placemaking 13 Landscape 61 Ecology 62 The approach 13 Drainage 63 Life: The Rutland community 13 Tourism & leisure 65 Spaces: The strength of place 16 Sustainable design & construction 66 Buildings: Architecture & materiality 20 Land value capture 68 St George’s Barracks: Then & now 21 Long-term stewardship 68 Response to opportunities & constraints 36 9.0 Character 69 5.0 A Community for life 37 General design principles 70 The need for homes in Rutland 37 Aspirations 38 10.0 Phasing & delivery 71 Density 40 Options originally considered 41 Initial concept (May 2018) 43 Initial mix of uses 44 PROJECT NUMBER: D2581 ALL PLANS IN THIS REPORT ARE REPRODUCED FROM ORDNANCE SURVEY DIGITAL MAP VERSION: E DATA © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LICENCE NUMBER 100022432. VERSION DATE: 27.11.18 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY UK MOD CROWN COPYRIGHT DIO 2018. CROWN COPYRIGHT AND COMMENT: FINAL REPORT DATABASE RIGHT 2018, ORDNANCE SURVEY 100023818 ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 3 SITE BOUNDARY 4 ST GEORGE’S BARRACKS | VISION 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT The document is structured as follows: PROCESS In November 2016, the Government announced through ‘A • Section 1: Introduction - sets out the purpose, structure For the creation of any new residential development to be Better Defence Estate’, a commitment to invest in a more and process involved in preparing the evolving masterplan successful, the process has to start with people.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Schedule
    Monday, August 14, 9:00 a.m. 49 Program Schedule The length of each session/meeting activities is one hour The course text will be Social Network Analysis: Methods and and forty minutes, unless noted otherwise. Session Applications (Cambridge, ENG and New York: Cambridge University presiders and committee chairs are requested to see that Press, 1994) by Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. We will focus sessions and meetings end on time to avoid conflicts with on chapters 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 13, and 15 from this book. We recommend that seminar attendees obtain this book in advance and read the first few subsequent activities scheduled into the same room and to chapters prior to the session. allow participants time to transit between hotels. 2000 ASA Chair Conference (preregistration required)— Program Corrections: The information printed here Friday, August 11, 12:30-9:30 p.m.—Marriott Wardman reflects session updates received from organizers Park, Balcony CD through July 14, 2000. Changes received after that date 2. Didactic Seminar. So You Want to Do Applied Policy will appear in the Program Changes section of the Research? Convention Bulletin distributed with Final Program packets. Please check that bulletin for the latest updates. Howard University (shuttle departs from the Marriott) Friday, August 11, 1:00-6:00 p.m. Ticket required for admission Leaders: Roberta Spalter-Roth, American Sociological Association Pre-Meeting Activities Beatrice Edwards, Public Services International This seminar is designed for those thinking of careers as applied Alpha Kappa Delta Executive Council—Friday, August 11, policy researchers (including advocacy research) and those teaching 8:00 a.m.-9:00 p.m.—Marriott Wardman Park, Nathan courses in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2010 - Volume 57, Number 4 the Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A
    WINTER 2010 - Volume 57, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Royal Canadian Air Force Stations - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 16
    List of Royal Canadian Air Force stations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 16 List of Royal Canadian Air Force stations From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is a list of stations operated by the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF), or stations where RCAF units existed, from 1924 until unification into the Canadian Forces on February 1, 1968. Some of the RCAF stations listed in this article link to facility descriptions containing the prefix "CFB" (Canadian Forces Base) or "CFS" (Canadian Forces Station). These facilities were at one time RCAF stations, but changed to CFBs or CFSs following unification of the Canadian Armed Forces in 1968. Most former RCAF stations still in use by the Canadian Forces are now operated by Air Command (AIRCOM). During the 1990s, most AIRCOM squadrons on Canadian Forces Bases were reorganized into "wings" as the primary lodger unit. Consequently, many Canadian Forces Bases used as air force bases are frequently referred to without the prefix CFB, e.g., "CFB Shearwater" is also referred to as "12 Wing Shearwater", with 12 Wing being the primary lodger unit at CFB Shearwater. All RCAF facilities followed the naming tradition of the Royal Air Force, whereby the prefix RCAF (vs. RAF) was affixed. Contents ■ 1 Operating locations (1924-1939) ■ 1.1 Primary Canadian stations ■ 1.1.1 Alberta ■ 1.1.2 British Columbia ■ 1.1.3 Manitoba ■ 1.1.4 Nova Scotia ■ 1.1.5 Ontario ■ 2 Operating locations (1939-1945) ■ 2.1 Primary Canadian stations ■ 2.1.1 Alberta ■ 2.1.2 British Columbia ■ 2.1.3 Manitoba ■ 2.1.4
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 76 April 2017.2
    Issue No. 76 April 2017 No 50 & No 61 SQUADRONS’ ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER 61 SQN 100TH ANNIVERSARY President Air Vice Marshal Nigel Baldwin CB CBE Past Permanent Presidents Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC FRAeS Air Chief Marshal Sir Augustus Walker GCB CBE DSO DFC AFC Past Vice-Presidents William Reid VC Eddie Davidson DFM James Flint DFC GM DFM AE Charles Swain Honorary Members Derek Tovey; Gillian Merron; Pam Connock MBE Rev Brian Stalley; Peter Small; Adrian Jones. Chairman Vice Chairman Secretary Wg Cdr (Retd) Peter Jacobs Sqn Ldr (Retd) Richard Jones Gerry Collins 61 Fulmar Road 26 Wadlands Rise 35 Wetherby Crescent Doddington Park Farsley Lincoln LN6 8SY Lincoln LN6 0LA Pudsey LS28 5JF 01522 681482 01522 826635 0113 2559931 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer & Membership Skellingthorpe Liaison Mike Connock Peter J Small 21 Goldfinch Close 63 Jerusalem Road Skellingthorpe Skellingthorpe Lincoln LN6 5SF Lincoln LN6 4RH 01522 683997 01522 827002 [email protected] Editorial Team Mike Connock Dining Secretary Richard Jones Parade Marshal Lynda Skinner Alan Biggs 24 Lincoln Road 19 St Marks Avenue Skellingthorpe Cherry Willingham Lincoln LN6 5UT Lincoln LN3 4LX 01522 681908 01522 751690 [email protected] [email protected] 2 FOREWORD “The fighters are our salvation, but the bombers alone provide the means of victory” Winston Churchill 1940 This edition is devoted to 61 Sqn in its Centenary year. One of the first RFC sqns formed to protect London and the South East from German aerial bombardment. We salute our 61 Sqn wartime veterans, some of whom we highlight in this Newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 42
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 42 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Crown Copyright/MOD. The photographs on pages 41, 43, 47, 50, 53, 97, 99, 104 and 106 have been reproduced with permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. First published in the UK in 2008 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman FRAeS Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain N Parton BSc (Hons) MA MDA MPhil CEng FRAeS RAF *Wing Commander A J C Walters BSc MA FRAeS RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS THE IMPORTANT OMISSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Melton Aviation Society Newsletter Edition No 8 April 2014
    Melton Aviation Society Newsletter Edition No 8 April 2014 “ ADDO AVITION UNA “ Bringing Aviation Together The Wingless Deterrent The RAF’s post war strength reach its peak in 1956 and three new aircraft entered service, the Vulcan, the Victor and the Valiant, commonly known as the V Force. These aircraft were to be used as the country’s Nuclear Deterrent. October 1956 saw the outbreak of the Suez War, and the RAFs aircraft were heavily involved in the crisis. The debacle of the Suez, diplomatic not military, saw a dramatic rethink in defence policy. The first manifestation of the new defence thinking was the infamous 1957 White Paper, in which Duncan Sandys, the Minister of Defence, forecast the end of manned aircraft and their replacement by guided missiles. In 1957 a proposal from the USA was put to Britain to deploy Thor Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles (IRBM) in the UK. The proposal was regarded favourably by Britain’s new Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan. Final agreement on the deployment of Thor in Britain was reached at the Bermuda Conference in March 1957, when Macmillan and Eisenhower met to discuss key issues. On 1 April, Macmillan reported to Parliament that: “The rockets will be the property of Her Majesty’s Government, manned by British troops who will receive their prior training from American experts. The rockets cannot be fired by any except the British personnel, but the warhead will be in the control of the United States – which is the law of the United States- and to that extent the Americans have negative control; but it is absolutely untrue to say that the President and not the British Government will decide when these missiles will be launched and at whom.
    [Show full text]