DOCSLIB.ORG

Replacement Pipeline Route Consultation Brochure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Replacement Pipeline Route Consultation Brochure Replacement Pipeline Route Consultation Securing aviation fuel supplies in South East England For more information please visit 1 www.slpproject.co.ukReplacement Pipeline Route Consultation ESSO PETROLEUM COMPANY, LIMITED (REGISTERED IN ENGLAND: NUMBER 26538) ERMYN HOUSE, ERMYN WAY, LEATHERHEAD, SURREY, KT22 8UX References in this document to “Esso” or “our” or “we” are intended to refer to the applicant, Esso Petroleum Company, Limited and nothing in this document is intended to override corporate separateness. How we will use the information that you provide Esso Petroleum Company, Limited and our 3rd party project partners will store and process your data in full compliance with our legal obligations for the purposes of the application, development and operation of the proposed Southampton London Pipeline. Further details about how your data will be used can be found on the website (www.slpproject.co.uk), or by contacting us by email ([email protected]) or telephone (07925 068 905). If you would like a large text or alternative format of this document, please contact us by email [email protected] or telephone 07925 068 905. Requests for alternative formats will be considered on a case by case basis. We will, as far as possible and proportionate, respond to any requests that help you to take part in this consultation. © Crown copyright and database rights 2018 OS Licence Number AL100005237 2 Contents 04 CHAPTER 01 - Replacement pipeline route consultation 06 CHAPTER 02 - Why we are replacing the pipeline now 07 CHAPTER 03 - The project stages 08 CHAPTER 04 - What we have taken into consideration 10 CHAPTER 05 - Installing the pipeline 14 CHAPTER 06 - The Code of Construction Practice 16 CHAPTER 07 - The preferred route 56 CHAPTER 08 - Our environmental assessments 57 CHAPTER 09 - Preliminary Environmental Information summary 74 CHAPTER 10 - What you will see above ground 75 CHAPTER 11 - How we are working with landowners 76 CHAPTER 12 - How we are consulting 78 CHAPTER 13 - The application for development consent 79 CHAPTER 14 - Thank you 80 CHAPTER 15 - Replacement Pipeline Route Consultation Response Form 3 Replacement Pipeline Route Consultation CHAPTER 1 Replacement pipeline route consultation Welcome to our second In this consultation, we are asking for your views on a All of the consultation materials are available on our consultation for the Southampton to route for the replacement pipeline and in particular on website at www.slpproject.co.uk or you can call us to London Pipeline Project. the route ‘sub-options’ presented in this brochure. We request hard copies of any of the documents. developed the preferred route by reviewing the available Our aim for the project is to replace Our technical team will also be coming into communities local technical data and taking into account your route 90km of the 105km aviation fuel along the replacement pipeline route to answer any specific feedback from the initial consultation. We also pipeline that runs from our Fawley questions you might have. The programme of events can collected data from organisations such as local councils, Refinery near Southampton to our be found in Chapter 12. environmental specialists and utility companies, as well as West London Terminal storage undertaking our own studies. I hope you find this brochure useful in understanding our facility in Hounslow. proposals for the project. We encourage your participation The preferred route will be subject to change following Our first consultation in spring 2018 helped us to select as this will help us refine the route before our application the consultation, as we will listen to your feedback and our preferred corridor. I would like to take this opportunity for development consent. If you have any questions, or consider it before finalising the route, ahead of our to thank the 1000+ people who responded to the initial if you would like to register your feedback, please do not application for development consent. consultation, those who took the time to visit our events hesitate to get in touch with the project team. and the landowners and organisations who have been I understand that you may have concerns about the speaking with us since we launched the project in 2017. project. The information set out in this brochure will take Tim Sunderland | Project Executive The information you have provided has really helped us to you through the preferred route, which we have split into understand local community concerns. sections, and will provide more detail about the land we would look to use temporarily during the installation of the We have been listening and incorporating early feedback pipeline. It also includes our early findings about options to into our current proposals. For example, following the reduce or mitigate installation impacts – see Chapter 9. corridor consultation we removed the corridor sub- option that passed Frimley Park Hospital due to feedback around traffic management and obstruction to emergency services. You can have your say on the project at www.slpproject.co.uk This is the fastest and easiest way to take part in this consultation This consultation starts on 6 September and closes at 23:45 on 19 October 2018 4 About Esso Esso is a brand of ExxonMobil, which has operated in the UK for over 120 years. In the early days ExxonMobil imported high quality lamp oil to the UK market. Today our focus on quality fuels remains, but our operations are far more extensive. Esso owns and operates the UK’s largest refinery at Fawley, which provides fuel for more than 800,000 retail customers every day at Esso-branded service stations. Our underground distribution pipeline network transports fuel from Fawley to our fuel The stables at Ailsa Wharf, one of the first four distribution In 1910 a horse drawn van used by the Anglo-American Oil depots established in 1888 by Anglo-American Oil (as Esso Co. for the delivery of 2-gallon cans of petroleum spirit on the terminals at Avonmouth, Birmingham, Hythe, then was). Distribution was carried out by horse drawn tank Isle of Wight. Purfleet, West London and also for use at the UK’s car until after WW1. busiest airports. ExxonMobil is one of the UK’s largest petrochemical manufacturers with major plants at Fawley, Fife and Newport. ExxonMobil also holds an interest in nearly 40 producing oil and gas fields in the UK North Sea, and a stake in the South Hook Liquefied Natural Gas plant at Milford Haven in Wales, which has the capacity to import 20 percent of the UK’s gas demand. 1957-This truck (equipped with a metering device and 1963 - A workman applies a concrete coating to one of ticket printer) was used to deliver Esso Blue kerosene to the pipes from Fawley to London to protect them from any householders in London. damage which may occur on the river bed. : 5 Replacement Pipeline Route Consultation CHAPTER 2 Why we are replacing the pipeline now Pipelines take tankers off our roads originally used to transport a type of oil used by large industrial sites and oil-fired power stations. This type of oil iney il einery The UK is criss-crossed by a network of underground ancheter had to be kept above 50°C to enable it to flow through the fuel pipelines transporting diesel, petrol and aviation fuel. pipeline. During the 1980s when natural gas became more tanlow The pipelines are largely hidden from view. This is a safe, widely available in the UK, the need for this type of heating secure and low-impact method of moving fuel over long ottingha fuel dwindled. With the growth of air travel, the pipeline distances. was then used to transport aviation fuel. ingry According to the UK Petroleum Industry Association, iringha The existing pipeline is working adequately, but the need more than 30 million tonnes of fuels are safely transported for inspections and maintenance is increasing. It is just like through UK pipelines every year. This takes around one your car: you reach a point where it makes more sense to million tanker journeys off our roads, reducing traffic replace it. Peroe n eathrow congestion. Avonoth oryton hae ilor aven The Planning Act 2008 changed the way we seek We safely operate more than 700km (435 miles) of permission for important infrastructure – it introduced the rleet pipelines in the UK. All our pipelines are constantly atwic Development Consent Order process. We announced the monitored. We also inspect the pipelines frequently using project in December 2017 to allow sufficient time to gain internal pipeline inspection gauges, known as ‘PIGs’. The Fawley approval and build the replacement, while maintaining ground above each pipeline is also regularly inspected on the safe and secure movement of fuel along the existing foot and from the air. pipeline. We aim to maintain the safe and secure movement When the new pipeline is operational, typically the normal of fuel http://www.ukpia.com/industry_information/distribution.aspx approach is to take the old one permanently out of action The existing pipeline was built between 1969 and 1972. (decommissioning) by removing all fuel and filling the This pipeline was constructed differently to the other pipeline with grout. pipelines in our UK network. The existing pipeline was Keeping 100 road tankers off the road every day 95 eady-to oduct Fawle ef ansport b gr eline Based on Esso’s 2015 data for its existing pipeline 6 CHAPTER 3 The project stages INTRODUCING DEVELOPMENT OF APPLICATION THE PROJECT PREFERRED ROUTE SUBMISSION 7 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 CONSULTATION ON PIPELINE CONSULTATION ON PROJECT CORRIDORS PREFERRED ROUTE STARTS 2021 Due to the length and purpose of the replacement Our initial consultation in spring 2018 helped us to need for access and construction management such pipeline, under the Planning Act 2008 this project is a 2 select the preferred corridor for the replacement as pipe lay down areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corridor Consultation Report
    Southampton to London Pipeline Project Non-Statutory Consultation Summary report Southampton to London Pipeline Project Non-Statutory Consultation: Summary report Client Esso Petroleum Company, Limited Title Southampton to London Pipeline Project Non- Statutory Consultation Subtitle Summary report Dates last revised 11/09/2018 Status Final Version Version 11.09.2018 Classification P01.1. Project Code 10970 Quality Assurance by Isabelle Guyot Main point of contact Ilina Georgieva Telephone 0207 239 7800 Email [email protected] P01.1.P Finalg - Version 11.09.2018 N o Southampton to London Pipeline Project Non-Statutory Consultation: Summary report Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 2 Feedback received on Route Corridor D ...................................................... 9 3 Feedback received on Route Corridor F ..................................................... 17 4 Feedback received on Route Corridor G .................................................... 24 5 Feedback received on Route Corridor J ..................................................... 32 6 Feedback received on Route Corridor M .................................................... 49 7 Feedback received on Route Corridor Q .................................................... 62 8 General comments ....................................................................................... 73 9 Feedback received on the consultation process ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fairoaks Garden Village Scoping Report April 2018
    Fairoaks Garden Village ScopingF Report April 2018 Our Ref: JCG23136 RPS 140 London Wall London EC2Y 5DN Tel: Email: rpsgroup.com/uk Fairoaks Garden Village QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: David Thomson, Philippa Coates and Chris Ellis Authorised by: David Thomson, Senior Director rd Date: 23 April 2018 Project Number/Document JCG23136 Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fairoaks Garden Village Ltd and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. Fairoaks Garden Village Scoping Report JCG23136 April 2018 Fairoaks Garden Village CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2 OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................... 10 3 EIA METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 20 4 PROPOSED SCOPE OF THE ES ......................................................................................................... 32 5 SCOPED IN TOPICS ............................................................................................................................. 33 6 SCOPED OUT TOPICS ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southampton to London Pipeline Project
    s Southampton to London Pipeline Project Reference EN07000 Surrey County Council Local Impact Report Final Version Submission Deadline 24 October 2019 Submitted by Surrey County Council Emailed to: [email protected] 23 October 2019 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction and Terms of Reference 7 2. Scheme Description 9 3. Minerals and Waste 11 4. Local Transport Issues 14 5. Social, Environmental and Economic Issues 17 6. The DCO 23 Appendix 1 – Surrey County Council’s Consultation Response April 2018 30 Appendix 2 – Local Archaeological Policies 39 Appendix 3 - Review of the submitted Environmental Statement & Habitat Regulations 41 Assessment in respect of impacts on Chobham Common SSSI and NNR, Thames Basin Heaths SPA and Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham SAC 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This Executive Summary sets out the key areas of concern for Surrey County Council (SCC) by theme. The LIR assesses the impact of these issues on the local area and sets out mitigation or amendments to the DCO that SCC considers necessary. 2. SCC is a host authority and has range of responsibilities in relation to the proposals, including, Highway Authority, County Planning Authority, Public Rights of Way and lead local flood authority. SCC is also a landowner affected by the scheme. 3. SCC has actively engaged with Esso during the pre-application period. Discussions have been proactive and the extent of agreement is set out in the Statement of Common Ground. SCC supports the principle of the scheme. However, there are a number of substantive issues that still need to be resolved to ensure that the scheme and associated powers are acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 3: Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements TV01: Windsor Great Park TV02: Runnymede Meadows & Slope TV03: Staines Moor & Shortwood Common TV04: Thorpe & Shepperton TV05: Molesey & Hersham December 2015 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area TV01: Windsor Great Park Local authorities: Runnymede Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape-scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Recognition of BOAs directly meets National Planning Policy Framework policy for the planning system to contribute to international commitments for halting the overall decline in biodiversity, by establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 109). Designation of BOAs in local plans will also fulfil NPPF requirements to plan for biodiversity at a landscape-scale across local authority boundaries; and identify & map components of the local ecological networks (para. 117). Explanatory BOAs identify the most important areas for wildlife conservation remaining in Surrey and each include a variety of habitats, providing for an ‘ecosystem approach’ to nature conservation across and beyond the county. By working with larger, more dynamic ecosystems, it will be possible to create a wider range of habitats and their variants, which will in turn increase the ability of the landscape to support the largest variety of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 10: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas
    Appendix 10: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas - Objectives & Targets Summary Target Target BOA name name BOA ( ha ha or km BOA ID BOA Objective/Target: SSSI units to Objective/Target: Objective/Target: Objective/Target: achieve/maintain Favourable SNCI protected & Restoration & creation of Priority Stability/recovery of condition (by area) positively managed habitats ) Priority species THAMES BASIN HEATHS TBH 01 Chobham Common North & O1/T1 Chobham Common SSSI 50% O2/T2 x8: All O3/T3a Heathland 6.5 O4/T4 Deptford pink Wentworth Heaths O3/T3b Acid grassland 5.75 Marsh clubmoss O3/T3c Wet woodland 1.25 Window-winged caddis O3/T3d Mixed deciduous woodland 75% Nightjar O3/T3e Fen 3.25 Woodlark Smooth snake TBH 02 Chobham South Heaths O1/T1 Chobham Common SSSI 50% O2/T2 x6: All O3/T3a Heathland 7 O4/T4 Deptford pink O3/T3b Acid grassland 6 Marsh clubmoss O3/T3c Fen 3.5 Shoulder-striped clover moth Nightjar Woodlark Sand lizard TBH 03 Colony Bog, Bagshot Heath & O1/T1 Colony Bog & Bagshot 50% O2/T2 x21: All O3/T3a Heathland 14.5 O4/T4 Chamomile Deepcut Heaths Heath SSSI O3/T3b Acid grassland 13 Marsh clubmoss [Basingstoke Canal SSSI] O3/T3c Fen 7.5 Heath tiger-beetle Nightjar Woodlark Smooth snake TBH 04 Ash, Brookwood & Whitmoor O1/T1 Ash to Brookwood Heaths 50% O2/T2 x33: All O3/T3a Heathland 26.5 O4/T4 Chamomile, Small fleabane Heaths SSSI O3/T3b Acid grassland 24.25 Marsh clubmoss, Pillwort, Veilwort Whitmoor Common SSSI " O3/T3c Wet woodland 5 Heath tiger-beetle Smarts & Prey Heaths SSSI " O3/T3d Mixed deciduous woodland 75% Window-winged
    [Show full text]
  • Water Cycle Study Phase 1 Scoping
    Runnymede Water Cycle Study: Phase 1 Scoping Runnymede Borough Council January 2018 Prepared for: Runnymede Borough Council AECOM 1 Runnymede Scoping Water Cycle Study Project reference 60550988 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Bernadine Maguire Chris Gordon Carl Pelling Principal Flood Risk & Coastal Senior Environmental Engineer Associate Director Consultant Bernadine Maguire Miguel Headley Principal Flood Risk & Coastal Graduate Engineer Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 1 15/11/2017 Draft for Client and 16/11/2017 Carl Pelling Associate Director Stakeholder comment 2 19/12/2017 Final for issue 04/01/2018 Carl Pelling Associate Director 3 09/01/2018 Final 10/01/2018 Carl Pelling Associate Director Prepared for: Runnymede Borough Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com Copyright © 2017 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: Appendix 3: Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 3: Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements TV01: Windsor Great Park TV02: Runnymede Meadows & Slope TV03: Staines Moor & Shortwood Common TV04: Thorpe & Shepperton TV05: Molesey & Hersham September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area TV01: Windsor Great Park Local authorities: Runnymede Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para. 174). Explanatory BOAs identify the most important areas for wildlife conservation remaining in Surrey and each include a variety of habitats, providing for an ‘ecosystem approach’ to nature conservation across and beyond the county. By working with larger, more dynamic ecosystems, it will be possible to create a wider range of habitats and their variants, which will in turn increase the ability of the landscape to support the widest variety of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Modelling Assessment at Hampton WTW Site
    Air quality modelling assessment at Hampton WTW site ___________________________________________________ Final Report for Thames Water Utilities Limited ED 12448 | Issue Number 2 | Date 09/09/2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment Air quality modelling assessment at Hampton WTW site | i Customer: Contact: Thames Water Utilities Limit Dr Mark Broomfield Ricardo Energy & Environment Customer reference: Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3493 e: [email protected] Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: Ricardo-AEA Ltd is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 This report is the Copyright of Thames Water/Ricardo Energy & Environment. It has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Environment, a trading name of Ricardo-AEA Ltd, Authors: under contract to Thames Water Utilities Limited dated 17/07/2019. Ricardo Energy & Ancelin Coulon Environment accepts no liability whatsoever to any third party for any loss or damage arising Approved By: from any interpretation or use of the information contained in this report, or reliance on any views Dr Mark Broomfield expressed therein. Date: 09 September 2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment reference: Ref: ED12448 Issue Number 2 Ref: Ricardo/ED12448/Issue Number 2 Ricardo Energy & Environment Air quality modelling assessment at Hampton WTW site | ii Executive summary The report describes an air quality impact assessment study conducted by Ricardo Energy & Environment for Thames Water Utilities Limited (TWUL). The study assesses the potential air quality impacts of the Thames Water Utilities Limited waste water treatment works in Hampton, Greater London. The site includes three diesel standby generators used for TRIAD avoidance (potential future CM inclusion). The three generators are modelled as simultaneously operating for 80 hours each per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F: Biodiversity
    Appendix F: Biodiversity Appendix F Table 1: Designated Nature Conservation Sites within 2.5 km of the Channel Section 1 site Appendix F Table 2: Designated Nature Conservation Sites within 2.5 km of the Channel Section 2 site Appendix F Table 3: Designated Nature Conservation Sites within 2.5 km of the Channel Section 3 and Desborough Cut site Appendix F Table 4: Designated Nature Conservation Sites within 1 km of the Weir Locations Appendix F Table 5: Designated Nature Conservation Sites within 2.5 km of the Ham Lands FSA Appendix F Table 6: Common and Latin names of species mentioned Appendix F Table 7: Summary of the ecological value of the principle protected and notable species within the study area Appendix F Table 8: Common and Latin names of species mentioned This Page has been intentionally left blank. Appendix Table 1: Designated Nature Conservation Sites within 2.5 km of the Channel Section 1 site Distance from Channel Reasons for Notification and Ecological Value Designated Site Name Section (m) (approx.) Statutory Sites South West London 0 A series of reservoirs and former gravel pits supporting a range of man-made Water bodies (SWLW), and semi-natural open water habitats. These sites provide important feeding SPA and Ramsar site. and roosting sites for wintering populations of gadwall and shoveler due to the numbers of European importance that occur. International and European value. Windsor Forest & Great 2375 Designated for old acidophilus oak woods in the south-eastern part of its UK Park SAC. range. Other qualifying features include Atlantic acidophilus beech Fagus sylvatica forests with common holly Ilex aquifolium, Violet click beetle and sometimes also yew Taxus baccata in the shrub layer.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Biodiversity: Assessment
    7. Biodiversity: Assessment Prepared for the Airports Commission November 2014 AIRPORTS COMMISSION BIODIVERSITY: ASSESSMENT Disclaimer Disclaimer Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Biodiversity: Baseline
    7. Biodiversity: Baseline Prepared for the Airports Commission November 2014 AIRPORTS COMMISSION BIODIVERSITY BASELINE Disclaimer Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Designated Sites in Surrey
    STATUTORY DESIGNATED SITES IN SURREY Statutory Designated Site Borough(s) Special Protection Areas (SPA) South West London Waterbodies SPA Elmbridge, Runnymede, Spelthorne Thames Basin Heaths SPA Elmbridge, Guildford, Surrey Heath, Waverley, Woking Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons SPA Waverley Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA Waverley Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Site) South West London Waterbodies Ramsar Site Elmbridge, Runnymede, Spelthorne Thursley & Ockley Bogs Ramsar Site Waverley Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment SAC Mole Valley, Reigate & Banstead Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham SAC Guildford, Surrey Heath, Waverley, Woking Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC Runnymede Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Ash to Brookwood Heaths SSSI Guildford, Surrey Heath, Woking Auclaye SSSI Mole Valley Banstead Downs SSSI Reigate & Banstead Basingstoke Canal SSSI Guildford, Surrey Heath, Woking Blackheath SSSI Guildford, Waverley Blindley Heath SSSI Tandridge Bookham Commons SSSI Mole Valley Bourley & Long Valley SSSI Waverley Broadmoor to Bagshot Woods & Heaths SSSI Surrey Heath Brook Brick Pit SSSI Waverley Charleshill SSSI Waverley Charterhouse to Eashing SSSI Guildford, Waverley Chiddingfold Forest SSSI Waverley Chipstead Downs SSSI Reigate & Banstead Chobham Common SSSI Surrey Heath Clock House Brickworks SSSI Mole Valley Colony Bog & Bagshot Heath SSSI Guildford, Surrey Heath, Woking Colyers Hanger SSSI Guildford Combe Bottom SSSI Guildford Devil's Punch Bowl SSSI Waverley Dumsey Meadow
    [Show full text]