DOCSLIB.ORG

Carnegie Mellon University MELLON COLLEGE of SCIENCE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Carnegie Mellon University MELLON COLLEGE OF SCIENCE THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICS TITLE: "Galaxy Clusters in the Presence of Substructure." PRESENTED BY: Evan Tucker ACCEPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS Matthew Walker 5/20/19 MATTHEW WALKER, CHAIR PROFESSOR DATE Scott Dodelson 5/23/19 SCOTT DODELSON, DEPT HEAD DATE APPROVED BY THE COLLEGE COUNCIL Rebecca Doerge 5/23/19 REBECCA DOERGE, DEAN DATE Galaxy Clusters in the Presence of Substructure by Evan Tucker Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Carnegie Mellon University Department of Physics Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Advised by Professor Matthew G. Walker May 17, 2019 Abstract My thesis focused on developing an end-to-end program for dynamical analyses of galaxy clusters. The main interest of the thesis is to develop a dynamical mass estimator used for galaxy clusters that has the capability to account for substructure which is currently a limitation on most dynamical mass estimators. Through already established collaborations, I had access to a cutting-edge multi-object spectrograph, the Michigan/Magellan Fiber System (M2FS), on the 6.5m Clay-Magellan Telescope in Chile; therefore, a signifiant portion of my thesis involved the collection, data reduction, and spectral analysis of new galaxy spectra. As part of this collaboration, I became a core member of the M2FS observation team, which sent me to Chile about a half dozen times to aid in the observations with M2FS. The early portions of my thesis project focused on the handling of newly obtained galaxy spectra with M2FS. The first M2FS observations of galaxies within clusters were collected in November 2013 as a pilot program for testing this instruments ca- pabilities at observing unresolved stellar populations. My goal with this portion of the project was to familiarize myself with the M2FS instrument and it's observations as well as to learn how to reduce the collected data. As part of this familiarization, I learned first-hand how to observe with M2FS and aid in the collection of other ob- servations over a variety of scientific interests. While reducing my own observations, I developed a front-end GUI to simplify the data reduction process and help expedite the reduction of future observations. Although, the data reduction pipeline I devel- oped works well at reducing a subset of M2FS observations, I was unable generalize the pipeline fully to handle all M2FS configurations. This is due to variations be- tween configurations such as resolution settings, multi-order spectra, and wavelength coverages. I also helped in the collection of spectra with M2FS over a range of scientific purposes. For projects more related to my own work, I collected spectra for galaxies within the clusters Abell 1689, MACS0429, and CL 1301. MACS0429 was part of my own research project and so I detail in this thesis the targeting, observation, data reduction, and spectral fits. In a first published paper, we report the results of a pilot program to use the Mag- ellan/M2FS spectrograph to survey the galactic populations and internal kinematics of galaxy clusters. For this initial study, we present spectroscopic measurements for 223 quiescent galaxies observed along the line of sight to the galaxy cluster Abell 267 (z 0:23). We develop a Bayesian method for modeling the integrated light from each∼ galaxy as a simple stellar population, with free parameters that spec- ify redshift (vlos=c) and characteristic age, metallicity ([Fe=H]), alpha-abundance ([α=Fe]), and internal velocity dispersion (σint) for individual galaxies. Parameter estimates derived from our 1.5-hour observation of A267 have median random errors 1 of σvlos = 20 km s− , σAge = 1:2 Gyr, σ[Fe=H] = 0:11 dex, σ[α/Fe] = 0:07 dex, and 1 σσint = 20 km s− . In a second paper currently under review, we develop and implement a model to analyze the internal kinematics of galaxy clusters that may contain subpopula- tions of galaxies that do not independently trace the cluster potential. The model allows for substructures within the cluster environment, disentangles cluster mem- bers from contaminating foreground and background galaxies, and includes an over- all cluster rotation term as part of the cluster kinematics. We estimate the cluster velocity dispersion and/or mass while marginalizing over uncertainties in all of the above complexities. We use these results to explore the sensitivity of inferred cluster properties to the treatment of substructure. Compared to a model that assumes no substructure, our substructure model reduces the dynamical mass of A267 by 22% 1 ∼ and shifts the cluster mean velocity by 100 km s− , approximately doubling the offset with respect to the velocity of A267's∼ brightest cluster galaxy. Embedding the spherical Jeans equation within this framework, we infer for A267 a halo of mass 14 M200 = 7:0 1:3 10 M =h and concentration log10 c200 = 0:71 0:38, consistent with the mass-concentration± × relation found in cosmological simulations.± A third paper (in preparation) presents the results of new M2FS spectroscopy for the cluster MACS0429. This cluster is part of the Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble (CLASH) and was the only CLASH cluster observable in the southern sky not covered by the spectroscopic follow-up program CLASH-VLT. We obtained over 700 spectra of 300 unique galaxies along with a couple dozen strongly lensed background galaxies.∼ We fit these spectra using the population synthesis pre- viously model applied to Abell 267 thus obtaining parameter estimates describing the mean redshift, age, metallicity, chemical enrichment and velocity dispersion of each galaxy's stellar population. 2 Acknowledgments I'd like to thank all the graduate students, post-docs and professors that helped me reach this pinnacle. Mario, for helping with observations and data reduction; you've taught me so much about the technical side of observational astronomy and instrumentation. Ed, for sharing in your expertise, life experiences, and helping to pass the time while observing in Chile. My committee, Rachel, Sergey, Hy, and Peter, for listening to my progression, showing patience as I learned, reading this thesis, and guiding my throughout this whole process. And of course, I'd like to thank my wonderful advisor Matt. You provided a nurturing environment that truly helped me grow as a researcher. I cannot thank you enough for your support and guidance. Lastly and most importantly, I'd like to dedicate this entire thesis to my life partner and best friend Alexandra. Without your unwavering dedication and support these past six years, I would have never been able to accomplish as much as I did. Everything that we achieve going forward is directly tied to the support you provided during the hardest years of my life. You are my rock, my protection, my everything. I love you. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Galaxy Clusters as Cosmological Probes . .3 1.1.1 Current Cosmological Models . .3 1.1.2 The Halo Mass Function . .7 1.2 Mass Estimation Techniques for Galaxy Clusters . .8 1.2.1 Lensing Masses . .9 1.2.2 X-ray Masses . 10 1.2.3 Dynamical Masses . 10 1.2.4 Current Limits on Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimates . 14 1.3 Previous Substructure Analysis Techniques . 15 1.4 Summary of Thesis . 16 2 Multi-object Spectroscopic Observations 18 2.1 The Michigan/Magellan Fiber System . 19 2.2 Observations with M2FS . 19 2.3 Data Reduction . 24 2.4 Observations of Galaxy Clusters with M2FS . 32 3 Magellan/M2FS Spectroscopy of Galaxy Clusters: Stellar Popula- tion Model and Application to Abell 267 35 3.1 Introduction . 35 3.2 Observations and Data Reduction . 37 3.2.1 Target Selection . 37 3.2.2 Observations . 37 3.2.3 Data Reduction . 38 3.2.4 Sky Subtraction . 41 3.3 Integrated Light Population Synthesis Model For Galaxy Spectra . 41 3.3.1 Integrated Light Spectral Library . 42 3.3.2 Spectral Model . 44 3.4 Analysis of Spectra . 46 3.4.1 Likelihood function and free parameters . 47 3.4.2 Parameter Estimation . 47 ii 3.4.3 Tests with Mock Spectra . 51 3.4.4 External Tests . 52 3.5 Results for Abell 267 . 55 3.5.1 Comparison to previous redshift results . 59 3.6 Conclusions . 61 4 Magellan/M2FS Spectroscopy of MACS 0429: Observations and Spectral Fits 63 4.1 Introduction . 63 4.2 Observations . 64 4.2.1 Target Selection . 64 4.2.2 M2FS Spectroscopy . 65 4.3 Spectral Fits . 68 4.3.1 Line Spread Function . 68 4.3.2 M0429 Spectral Fits . 69 4.3.3 Comparison of repeat observations . 72 4.4 Conclusions . 73 5 Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimates in the Presence of Substructure 75 5.1 Introduction . 75 5.2 Galaxy Cluster Mixture Model . 77 5.3 Tests with Mock Observations from Simulations . 80 5.3.1 The MultiDark Simulation . 80 5.3.2 Mock Observations . 80 5.3.3 Model Setup . 81 5.3.4 Results . 84 5.4 Application to A267 . 90 5.4.1 Observational Dataset . 90 5.4.2 Contamination Model . 91 5.4.3 Uniform Velocity Dispersion Profile . 94 5.4.4 Dark Matter Halo Model . 103 5.5 Conclusions . 114 6 Conclusions and Future Outlook 118 A Data Tables 124 iii List of Tables 1.1 Current cosmological parameter estimates for flat-ΛCDM cosmology. These values come from a joint analysis of DES Y1 + Planck + JLA + BAO [51]. In ΛCDM the equation of state of dark energy is fixed at w = 1. Included here is the parameter estimate for w to show that even− when this assumption is not made, the value is still close to 1 .7 − 3.1 Free parameters and priors for Integrated Light Population Synthesis Model .
Recommended publications
  • Adrien Christian René THOB

    Adrien Christian René THOB

    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MORPHOLOGY AND KINEMATICS OF GALAXIES AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON DARK MATTER HALO STRUCTURE IN SIMULATED GALAXIES Adrien Christian René THOB A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 26 April 2019 To my grand-parents, René Roumeaux, Christian Thob, Yvette Roumeaux (née Bajaud) and Anne-Marie Thob (née Léglise). ii Abstract Galaxies are among nature’s most majestic and diverse structures. They can play host to as few as several thousands of stars, or as many as hundreds of billions. They exhibit a broad range of shapes, sizes, colours, and they can inhabit vastly differing cosmic environments. The physics of galaxy formation is highly non-linear and in- volves a variety of physical mechanisms, precluding the development of entirely an- alytic descriptions, thus requiring that theoretical ideas concerning the origin of this diversity are tested via the confrontation of numerical models (or “simulations”) with observational measurements. The EAGLE project (which stands for Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments) is a state-of-the-art suite of such cos- mological hydrodynamical simulations of the Universe. EAGLE is unique in that the ill-understood efficiencies of feedback mechanisms implemented in the model were calibrated to ensure that the observed stellar masses and sizes of present-day galaxies were reproduced. We investigate the connection between the morphology and internal 9:5 kinematics of the stellar component of central galaxies with mass M? > 10 M in the EAGLE simulations. We compare several kinematic diagnostics commonly used to describe simulated galaxies, and find good consistency between them.
  • A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation Within a Modified ΛCDM Framework J

    A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation Within a Modified ΛCDM Framework J

    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. theory_dark_universe_arxiv c ESO 2018 November 5, 2018 A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: Negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework J. S. Farnes1; 2 1 Oxford e-Research Centre (OeRC), Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QG, UK. e-mail: [email protected]? 2 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, PO Box 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Received February 23, 2018 ABSTRACT Dark energy and dark matter constitute 95% of the observable Universe. Yet the physical nature of these two phenomena remains a mystery. Einstein suggested a long-forgotten solution: gravitationally repulsive negative masses, which drive cosmic expansion and cannot coalesce into light-emitting structures. However, contemporary cosmological results are derived upon the reasonable assumption that the Universe only contains positive masses. By reconsidering this assumption, I have constructed a toy model which suggests that both dark phenomena can be unified into a single negative mass fluid. The model is a modified ΛCDM cosmology, and indicates that continuously-created negative masses can resemble the cosmological constant and can flatten the rotation curves of galaxies. The model leads to a cyclic universe with a time-variable Hubble parameter, potentially providing compatibility with the current tension that is emerging in cosmological measurements. In the first three-dimensional N-body simulations of negative mass matter in the scientific literature, this exotic material naturally forms haloes around galaxies that extend to several galactic radii. These haloes are not cuspy. The proposed cosmological model is therefore able to predict the observed distribution of dark matter in galaxies from first principles.
  • Dark Energy and Dark Matter

    Dark Energy and Dark Matter

    Dark Energy and Dark Matter Jeevan Regmi Department of Physics, Prithvi Narayan Campus, Pokhara [email protected] Abstract: The new discoveries and evidences in the field of astrophysics have explored new area of discussion each day. It provides an inspiration for the search of new laws and symmetries in nature. One of the interesting issues of the decade is the accelerating universe. Though much is known about universe, still a lot of mysteries are present about it. The new concepts of dark energy and dark matter are being explained to answer the mysterious facts. However it unfolds the rays of hope for solving the various properties and dimensions of space. Keywords: dark energy, dark matter, accelerating universe, space-time curvature, cosmological constant, gravitational lensing. 1. INTRODUCTION observations. Precision measurements of the cosmic It was Albert Einstein first to realize that empty microwave background (CMB) have shown that the space is not 'nothing'. Space has amazing properties. total energy density of the universe is very near the Many of which are just beginning to be understood. critical density needed to make the universe flat The first property that Einstein discovered is that it is (i.e. the curvature of space-time, defined in General possible for more space to come into existence. And Relativity, goes to zero on large scales). Since energy his cosmological constant makes a prediction that is equivalent to mass (Special Relativity: E = mc2), empty space can possess its own energy. Theorists this is usually expressed in terms of a critical mass still don't have correct explanation for this but they density needed to make the universe flat.
  • Self-Interacting Inelastic Dark Matter: a Viable Solution to the Small Scale Structure Problems

    Self-Interacting Inelastic Dark Matter: a Viable Solution to the Small Scale Structure Problems

    Prepared for submission to JCAP ADP-16-48/T1004 Self-interacting inelastic dark matter: A viable solution to the small scale structure problems Mattias Blennow,a Stefan Clementz,a Juan Herrero-Garciaa; b aDepartment of physics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Tech- nology, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden bARC Center of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale (CoEPP), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia Abstract. Self-interacting dark matter has been proposed as a solution to the small- scale structure problems, such as the observed flat cores in dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies. If scattering takes place through light mediators, the scattering cross section relevant to solve these problems may fall into the non-perturbative regime leading to a non-trivial velocity dependence, which allows compatibility with limits stemming from cluster-size objects. However, these models are strongly constrained by different observations, in particular from the requirements that the decay of the light mediator is sufficiently rapid (before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis) and from direct detection. A natural solution to reconcile both requirements are inelastic endothermic interactions, such that scatterings in direct detection experiments are suppressed or even kinematically forbidden if the mass splitting between the two-states is sufficiently large. Using an exact solution when numerically solving the Schr¨odingerequation, we study such scenarios and find regions in the parameter space of dark matter and mediator masses, and the mass splitting of the states, where the small scale structure problems can be solved, the dark matter has the correct relic abundance and direct detection limits can be evaded.

  • Throughout the Universe, Galaxies Are Rushing Away from Us – and from Each Other – at Tremendously High Speeds

    Our Universe Began with a Bang Throughout the Universe, galaxies are rushing away from us – and from each other – at tremendously high speeds. This fact tells us that the Universe is expanding over time. Edwin Hubble (after whom the Hubble Space Telescope was named) first measured the expansion in 1929. Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Edwin Hubble This posed a big question. If we could run the cosmic movie backward in time, would everything in the Universe be crammed together in a blazing fireball – the starting point of Edwin Hubble & Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences Hubble’s famous diagram showing the the Big Bang? A lot of scientific distance versus velocity of the galaxies he debate and many new theories observed. The farther away the galaxies, the faster they are moving, showing that the followed Hubble’s discovery. Universe is expanding. Among those in the front lines of the debate were physicists Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman. In 1948 they predicted that an afterglow of this fireball should still exist, though at a much lower temperature than at the time of the Big Bang. Here’s why: As the Universe Fun Fact: expands, the waves of heat About radiation from the Big Bang are 1% of the stretched out, and cool from “snow” you see visible energy to infrared and on broadcast TV then to microwave wavelengths. is caused by the Microwaves are just short- cosmic microwave wavelength radio waves, the same background. form of energy used in microwave ovens. The prediction of an afterglow could be tested! Scientists began building instruments to detect this “cosmic microwave background”, or CMB.
  • Probing the Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe

    Probing the Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe

    PROBING THE NATURE OF DARK MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE A Thesis Submitted For The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy In The Faculty Of Science by Abir Sarkar Under the supervision of Prof. Shiv K Sethi Raman Research Institute Joint Astronomy Programme (JAP) Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science BANGALORE - 560012 JULY, 2017 c Abir Sarkar JULY 2017 All rights reserved Declaration I, Abir Sarkar, hereby declare that the work presented in this doctoral thesis titled `Probing The Nature of Dark Matter in the Universe', is entirely original. This work has been carried out by me under the supervision of Prof. Shiv K Sethi at the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Raman Research Institute under the Joint Astronomy Programme (JAP) of the Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science. I further declare that this has not formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma, membership, associateship or similar title of any university or institution. Department of Physics Abir Sarkar Indian Institute of Science Date : Bangalore, 560012 INDIA TO My family, without whose support this work could not be done Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Shiv K Sethi in Raman Research Institute(RRI). He has always spent substantial time whenever I have needed for any academic discussions. I am thankful for his inspirations and ideas to make my Ph.D. experience produc- tive and stimulating. I am also grateful to our collaborator Prof. Subinoy Das of Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India. I am thankful to him for his insightful comments not only for our publica- tions but also for the thesis.
  • Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory1

    Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory1

    Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-ray Observatory1 H Tananbaum1, M C Weisskopf2, W Tucker1, B Wilkes1 and P Edmonds1 1Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. 2 NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, ZP12, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805. Abstract. Within 40 years of the detection of the first extrasolar X-ray source in 1962, NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory has achieved an increase in sensitivity of 10 orders of magnitude, comparable to the gain in going from naked-eye observations to the most powerful optical telescopes over the past 400 years. Chandra is unique in its capabilities for producing sub-arcsecond X-ray images with 100-200 eV energy resolution for energies in the range 0.08<E<10 keV, locating X-ray sources to high precision, detecting extremely faint sources, and obtaining high resolution spectra of selected cosmic phenomena. The extended Chandra mission provides a long observing baseline with stable and well-calibrated instruments, enabling temporal studies over time-scales from milliseconds to years. In this report we present a selection of highlights that illustrate how observations using Chandra, sometimes alone, but often in conjunction with other telescopes, have deepened, and in some instances revolutionized, our understanding of topics as diverse as protoplanetary nebulae; massive stars; supernova explosions; pulsar wind nebulae; the superfluid interior of neutron stars; accretion flows around black holes; the growth of supermassive black holes and their role in the regulation of star formation and growth of galaxies; impacts of collisions, mergers, and feedback on growth and evolution of groups and clusters of galaxies; and properties of dark matter and dark energy.
  • A New Universe to Discover: a Guide to Careers in Astronomy

    A New Universe to Discover: a Guide to Careers in Astronomy

    A New Universe to Discover A Guide to Careers in Astronomy Published by The American Astronomical Society What are Astronomy and Astrophysics? Ever since Galileo first turned his new-fangled one-inch “spyglass” on the moon in 1609, the popular image of the astronomer has been someone who peers through a telescope at the night sky. But astronomers virtually never put eye to lens these days. The main source of astronomical data is still photons (particles of light) from space, but the tools used to gather and analyze them are now so sophisticated that it’s no longer necessary (or even possible, in most cases) for a human eye to look through them. But for all the high-tech gadgetry, the 21st-Century astronomer is still trying to answer the same fundamental questions that puzzled Galileo: How does the universe work, and where did it come from? Webster’s dictionary defines “astronomy” as “the science that deals with the material universe beyond the earth’s atmosphere.” This definition is broad enough to include great theoretical physicists like Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Stephen Hawking as well as astronomers like Copernicus, Johanes Kepler, Fred Hoyle, Edwin Hubble, Carl Sagan, Vera Rubin, and Margaret Burbidge. In fact, the words “astronomy” and “astrophysics” are pretty much interchangeable these days. Whatever you call them, astronomers seek the answers to many fascinating and fundamental questions. Among them: *Is there life beyond earth? *How did the sun and the planets form? *How old are the stars? *What exactly are dark matter and dark energy? *How did the Universe begin, and how will it end? Astronomy is a physical (non-biological) science, like physics and chemistry.
  • Stsci Newsletter: 2011 Volume 028 Issue 02

    Stsci Newsletter: 2011 Volume 028 Issue 02

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Interacting Galaxies UGC 1810 and UGC 1813 Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA) 2011 VOL 28 ISSUE 02 NEWSLETTER Space Telescope Science Institute We received a total of 1,007 proposals, after accounting for duplications Hubble Cycle 19 and withdrawals. Review process Proposal Selection Members of the international astronomical community review Hubble propos- als. Grouped in panels organized by science category, each panel has one or more “mirror” panels to enable transfer of proposals in order to avoid conflicts. In Cycle 19, the panels were divided into the categories of Planets, Stars, Stellar Rachel Somerville, [email protected], Claus Leitherer, [email protected], & Brett Populations and Interstellar Medium (ISM), Galaxies, Active Galactic Nuclei and Blacker, [email protected] the Inter-Galactic Medium (AGN/IGM), and Cosmology, for a total of 14 panels. One of these panels reviewed Regular Guest Observer, Archival, Theory, and Chronology SNAP proposals. The panel chairs also serve as members of the Time Allocation Committee hen the Cycle 19 Call for Proposals was released in December 2010, (TAC), which reviews Large and Archival Legacy proposals. In addition, there Hubble had already seen a full cycle of operation with the newly are three at-large TAC members, whose broad expertise allows them to review installed and repaired instruments calibrated and characterized. W proposals as needed, and to advise panels if the panelists feel they do not have The Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS), Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS), the expertise to review a certain proposal. Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS), Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS), and The process of selecting the panelists begins with the selection of the TAC Chair, Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) were all close to nominal operation and were avail- about six months prior to the proposal deadline.
  • Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed Individual Bright Stars in Andromeda

    Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed Individual Bright Stars in Andromeda

    The Resolution: Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed individual bright stars in Andromeda • Calculated the distance using the Period-Luminosity Relation for Cepheid Variable Stars The Resolution: Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed individual bright stars in Andromeda • Calculated the distance using the Period-Luminosity Relation for Cepheid Variable Stars 1. MEASURED magnitude & Period The Resolution: Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed individual bright stars in Andromeda • Calculated the distance using the Period-Luminosity Relation for Cepheid Variable Stars 1. MEASURED magnitude & Period 2. CALCULATED Luminosity The Resolution: Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed individual bright stars in Andromeda • Calculated the distance using the Period-Luminosity Relation for Cepheid Variable Stars 1. MEASURED magnitude & Period 2. CALCULATED Luminosity 3. CALCULATED Distance The Resolution: Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) Measured Distance to Andromeda Galaxy (M31) • Noticed individual bright stars in Andromeda • Calculated the distance using the Period-Luminosity Relation for Cepheid Variable Stars 1. MEASURED magnitude & Period 2. CALCULATED Luminosity 3. CALCULATED Distance • Result was MUCH farther than expected... • (2.3 Million Ly - well beyond Milky Way) Henrietta Leavitt & Period-Luminosity Relation Cepheid Variables: Bright stars whose Luminosity (energy output) varies every
  • The Cosmic Web! What Does Our Universe Look Like on the Largest Scale?

    The Cosmic Web! What Does Our Universe Look Like on the Largest Scale?

    Lecture III The Cosmic Web! what does our Universe look like on the largest scale? aurorasimionescu.wordpress.com/teaching “Large-scale structure” refers to spatial scales larger than single galaxies: superclusters, clusters, groups, filaments, walls, voids What structure is our own Galaxy embedded in? The Local Group What structure is our own Galaxy embedded in? The Virgo Supercluster: a ~ 60 Mpc flattened structure, centered on the Virgo Cluster; the Local Group is at the outskirts. We are falling towards Virgo with ~ 300 km/s, and will get there in about 10 - 15 Gyr What structure is our own Galaxy embedded in? The Laniakea Supercluster find locations where peculiar velocity flows diverge, rather than defining structures based on galaxy number overdensity R. Brent Tully et al. Nature 513, 71 (2014) Redshift surveys To map and quantify the LSS (and compare with theoretical predictions), we need redshift surveys: mapping the 3-D distribution of galaxies in space (2D position on the sky plus redshift used as distance indicator) The 2dF (2 degree Field) redshift survey done with the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian telescope from 1997-2002 – Redshifts of ~ 250,000 galaxies with B < 19.5 mag, covering 5% of the sky reaching to z ~ 0.3 The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) done with a dedicated 2.5-m telescope at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico – Multicolor imaging to r ~ 23 mag, and spectra of galaxies down to r < 17.5 mag, reaching to z ~ 0.7; final data release covers 35% of sky and spectra from 3 million objects The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey How do we quantify Large-Scale Structure? If galaxies are clustered, they are “correlated”.
  • Astrophysics in 2006 3

    Astrophysics in 2006 3

    ASTROPHYSICS IN 2006 Virginia Trimble1, Markus J. Aschwanden2, and Carl J. Hansen3 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4575, Las Cumbres Observatory, Santa Barbara, CA: ([email protected]) 2 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Organization ADBS, Building 252, 3251 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304: ([email protected]) 3 JILA, Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309: ([email protected]) Received ... : accepted ... Abstract. The fastest pulsar and the slowest nova; the oldest galaxies and the youngest stars; the weirdest life forms and the commonest dwarfs; the highest energy particles and the lowest energy photons. These were some of the extremes of Astrophysics 2006. We attempt also to bring you updates on things of which there is currently only one (habitable planets, the Sun, and the universe) and others of which there are always many, like meteors and molecules, black holes and binaries. Keywords: cosmology: general, galaxies: general, ISM: general, stars: general, Sun: gen- eral, planets and satellites: general, astrobiology CONTENTS 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Up 6 1.2 Down 9 1.3 Around 10 2. Solar Physics 12 2.1 The solar interior 12 2.1.1 From neutrinos to neutralinos 12 2.1.2 Global helioseismology 12 2.1.3 Local helioseismology 12 2.1.4 Tachocline structure 13 arXiv:0705.1730v1 [astro-ph] 11 May 2007 2.1.5 Dynamo models 14 2.2 Photosphere 15 2.2.1 Solar radius and rotation 15 2.2.2 Distribution of magnetic fields 15 2.2.3 Magnetic flux emergence rate 15 2.2.4 Photospheric motion of magnetic fields 16 2.2.5 Faculae production 16 2.2.6 The photospheric boundary of magnetic fields 17 2.2.7 Flare prediction from photospheric fields 17 c 2008 Springer Science + Business Media.