DOCSLIB.ORG

Madagascar 2015 to 2025

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NATIONALNATIONAL BIODIVERSITYBIODIVERSITY ANDAND ACTIONACTION PLANSPLANS 2015Decree N° 2016-128 of 2016, february 23 -adopting the 2025National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans for Madagascar 2015 to 2025 2016 Authors of the book : RABARISON Harison RANDRIAMAHALEO Sahoby Ivy ANDRIAMBELO Fara Mihanta RANDRIANASOLO Hanitra Lalaina MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DE L’ECOLOGIE, DE LA MER ET DES FORETS ---------------------- Décret n° 2016-128 portant adoption de la Stratégie et Plans d’Actions Nationaux pour la Biodiversité de Madagascar de 2015 à 2025 LE PREMIER MINISTRE, CHEF DU GOUVERNEMENT - Vu la Constitution ; - Vu la loi n° 95-013 du 09 Août 1995 autorisant la ratification de la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique ; - Vu la loi n° 2003-032 du 20 novembre 2003 autorisant la ratification du Protocole de Cartagena sur la Biosécurité ; - Vu la Loi n° 2013-010 du 12 juin 2013 autorisant la ratification du Protocole de Nagoya sur l’accès aux ressources génétiques et le partage juste et équitable des avantages découlant de leur utilisation relatif à la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique; - Vu la loi n°2015-003 du 19 février 2015 portant Charte de l’Environnement Malagasy actualisée ; - Vu le décret n° 95-695 du 3 Novembre 1995 portant ratification de la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique ; - Vu le décret n° 2003-1095 portant ratification du Protocole de Cartagena sur la prévention des risques biotechnologiques relatif à la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique ; - Vu le décret n° 2014 – 794 du 17 juin 2014 portant ratification du Protocole de Nagoya sur l’accès aux ressources génétiques et le partage juste et équitable des avantages découlant de leur utilisation relatif à la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique; - Vu le décret n°2015-021 du 14 janvier 2015 portant nomination du Premier Ministre, Chef du Gouvernement ; - Vu le décret n° 2015-030 du 25 janvier 2015, modifié et complété par le Décret n°2016-070 du 02 Février 2016 portant nomination des membres du Gouvernement ; - Vu le décret n°2015-092 du 10 février 2015 fixant les attributions du Ministre de l’Environnement, de l’Ecologie, de la Mer et des Forêts ainsi que l’organisation générale de son Ministère, Sur proposition du Ministre de l’Environnement, de l’Ecologie, de la Mer et des Forêts, En Conseil du Gouvernement, DECRETE Article premier : En application des dispositions générales de la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique et de la Charte de l’Environnement Malagasy actualisée sont adoptés la Stratégie et Plans d’Actions Nationaux pour la Biodiversité de Madagascar pour la période 2015 à 2025, annexés au présent décret. Article 2 : Des textes réglementaires précisent, en tant que de besoin les modalités d’application du présent décret. Article 3 : Le Ministre d’Etat chargé des Projets Présidentiels, de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Equipement, le Ministre auprès de la Présidence chargé des Mines et du Pétrole, le Ministre des Affaires Etrangères, le Ministre de la Justice, Garde des Sceaux, le Ministre des Finances et du Budget, le Ministre de l’Intérieur et de la Décentralisation, le Ministre de l’Economie et de la Planification, le Ministre de l’Agriculture, le Ministre des Ressources Halieutiques et de la Pêche, le Ministre de l’Education Nationale, Le Ministre des Travaux Publics, le Ministre du Tourisme, des Transports et de la Météorologie, le Ministre de l’Energie et des Hydrocarbures, le Ministre de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique, le Ministre de l’Environnement, de l’Ecologie, de la Mer et des Forêts, le Ministre de l’Eau, de l’ Assainissement et de l’Hygiène, le Ministre de l’Elevage, le Ministre de la Population, de la Protection Sociale et de la Promotion de la Femme, le Secrétaire d’Etat auprès du Ministère de la Défense Nationale chargé de la Gendarmerie sont chargés, chacun en ce qui le concerne de l’exécution du présent décret, qui sera enregistré et publié au journal officiel de la République. Fait à Antananarivo, le 23 février 2016 Par le Premier Ministre Général de Brigade Aérienne Jean RAVELONARIVO Chef du Gouvernement Le Ministre d’Etat chargé des Projets Présidentiels, de Le Ministre auprès de la Présidence l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Equipement chargé des Mines et du Pétrole RAKOTOVAO Rivo LALAHARISAINA Joéli Valérien Le Ministre des Affaires Etrangères Le Ministre de la Justice ATTALAH Béatrice RAMANANTENASOA Noëline Le Ministre des Finances et du Budget Le Ministre de l’Intérieur et de la Décentralisation RAKOTOARIMANANA François Marie MAHAFALY SOLONANDRASANA Olivier Maurice Gervais Le Ministre de l’Economie et de la Planification Le Ministre de l’Agriculture Général de Corps d’Armée RAVELOHARISON RAVATOMANGA Rolland Herilanto Ministre des Ressources Halieutiques et de la Pêche par Le Ministre de l’Education Nationale intérim RABARY Andrianiaina Paul RAFIDIMANANA Narson Le Ministre des Travaux Publics Le Ministre du Tourisme, des Transports RATSIRAKA Iarovana Roland et de la Météorologie ANDRIANTIANA Jacques Ulrich Le Ministre de l’Energie et des Hydrocarbures Le Ministre de l’Enseignement Supérieur HORACE Gatien et de la Recherche Scientifique RASOAZANANERA Marie Monique Le Ministre de l’Environnement, de l’Ecologie, de la Mer Le Ministre de l’Eau, de l’Assainissement et de et de Forêts l’Hygiène BEBOARIMISA Ralava NDAHIMANANJARA Bénédicte Johanita Le Ministre de l’Elevage Le Ministre de la Population, de la Protection Sociale RAMPARANY RAMANANA Anthelme et de la Promotion de la Femme REALY Onitiana Voahiraniaina Le secrétaire d’Etat auprès du Ministère de la Défense Nationale chargé de la Gendarmerie General de Corps d’Armée PAZA Didier Gérard Pour ampliation conforme Antananarivo, le Le Secrétaire Général du Gouvernement FARATIANA Tsihoara Eugène NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLANS (2015-2025) December 2015 1 PREFACE Madagascar has pledged to preserve its biodiversity and enhance its benefits to the Malagasy people by ratifying the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1997. In order to implement the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Targets, it reviews and updates its hereby National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans for (NBSAP) to become an instrument of national policy. It will have begun shortly to implement this updated NBSAP which is to be effective, participatory since its conception. We invite you to the discovery and to get a sounder knowledge of its so rich and unique biodiversity, but at the same time which is an overwhelming danger looming ahead if appropriate measures or steps are not taken to stop the scourge that prevails throughout its bosom this meet the ever growing needs of the Malagasy people more or less direct expense of the natural resources that surround it. We hope that the reality presented in this paper will encourage all concerned to work together to reduce various stresses and pressures affecting biodiversity and to open new horizons in order to provide greater promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. It is combining biodiversity conservation and sustainable economic development and to improve the quality of life of the Malagasy people and the future of the next generation. Moreover, it will also require a strong political will and a well concerted and thoughtful decision about the choice to do in case of sectoral disputes. Indeed, the competition persists between biodiversity conservation and the great mining explorations and oil exploitation in some places such as protected areas or other unprotected locations but very rich in biodiversity and even for multiple wild and illegal logging, claiming all policy decisions respecting the principles of sustainable development to deal with the poverty that persists. And following the socio-political crisis raging in Madagascar in recent years, more or less disastrous consequences that ensued remain engraved in the annals of the biodiversity of Madagascar. Indeed, it is known that the island continent holds a record in the terms richness and specificity of its biological diversity, unfortunately it also held that illegal 2 exploitation of natural resources especially during such crisis. Currently, it can be said that efforts are on the horizon to give the Malagasy biodiversity rank and consideration should return it, as before. The gradual return of donors and developing new partnerships will surely revive hope of this momentum. The beautiful photographs of this document, which show some animal and plant species shows a striking contrast between the prevailing social, political, economic and cultural richness of nature that risks becoming simply a mythical legend in a few years if no action is urgently undertaken now. The newly created protected areas will no longer be a distant memory knowing that they are mostly prey to the illegal exploitation of forest wood and precious minerals and where men are still seeking land to establish themselves, grow or exploit and in their passage to ravage natural resources. Indeed, the rate of deterioration in the present forest cover, the coral reefs and the reduction in marine production around the Big Island worried many people in the scientific and environmental community. In this document, the national targets are developed taking into account the Big Island priorities and capacities in order to contribute to the global collective efforts so that we can together achieve the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in its overall level. It is question for the countries to integrate biodiversity in the process of planning, development, and accounting at the national level. The integration of this strategy into national planning and activities of all sectors is expected to have positive consequences for biodiversity. This document is expected to be updated as and when changes in Biodiversity Conservation in Madagascar. It is also planned monitoring and review of the implementation of the NBSAP and national targets according to the indicators determined therein. Furthermore, biodiversity loss continues to increase dramatically in a worrying manner on our planet.
Recommended publications
  • Gastrointestinal Parasites of Captive and Free-Living Lemurs and Domestic Carnivores in Eastern Madagascar

    Gastrointestinal Parasites of Captive and Free-Living Lemurs and Domestic Carnivores in Eastern Madagascar

    Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 47(1): 141–149, 2016 Copyright 2016 by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians GASTROINTESTINAL PARASITES OF CAPTIVE AND FREE-LIVING LEMURS AND DOMESTIC CARNIVORES IN EASTERN MADAGASCAR Amy B. Alexander, D.V.M., Cle´mence Poirotte, D.V.M., Ingrid J. Porton, M.S., Karen L.M. Freeman, Ph.D., Fidisoa Rasambainarivo, D.V.M., M.S., Kimberly G. Olson, R.V.T., Bernard Iambana, and Sharon L. Deem, D.V.M., Ph.D., Dipl. A.C.Z.M. Abstract: Fecal samples from captive and free-living lemurs at Ivoloina Zoological Park (IZP) and domestic carnivores from six villages surrounding IZP were evaluated between July and August 2012. Free-living lemurs from Betampona Natural Reserve (BNR), a relatively pristine rainforest fragment 40 km away, were also evaluated in November 2013. All 33 dogs sampled (100%) and 16 of 22 cats sampled (72.7%) were parasitized, predominantly with nematodes (strongyles, ascarids, and spirurids) as well as cestodes and protozoans. Similar types of parasites were identified in the lemur populations. Identification of spirurid nematodes and protozoans in the lemur fecal samples were of concern due to previously documented morbidity and mortality in lemurs from these parasitic agents. Twelve of 13 free-living (93%) and 31 of 49 captive (63%) lemurs sampled at IZP had a higher parasite prevalence than lemurs at BNR, with 13 of 24 (54%) being parasitized. The lemurs in BNR are likely at risk of increased exposure to these parasites and, therefore, increased morbidity and mortality, as humans and their domestic animals are encroaching on this natural area.
  • Lemur News 7 (2002).Pdf

    Lemur News 7 (2002).Pdf

    Lemur News Vol. 7, 2002 Page 1 Conservation International’s President EDITORIAL Awarded Brazil’s Highest Honor In recognition of his years of conservation work in Brazil, CI President Russell Mittermeier was awarded the National Are you in favor of conservation? Do you know how conser- Order of the Southern Cross by the Brazilian government. vation is viewed by the academic world? I raise these ques- Dr. Mittermeier received the award on August 29, 2001 at tions because they are central to current issues facing pri- the Brazilian Ambassador's residence in Washington, DC. matology in general and prosimians specifically. The National Order of the Southern Cross was created in The Duke University Primate Center is in danger of being 1922 to recognize the merits of individuals who have helped closed because it is associated with conservation. An inter- to strengthen Brazil's relations with the international com- nal university review in 2001 stated that the Center was too munity. The award is the highest given to a foreign national focused on conservation and not enough on research. The re- for service in Brazil. viewers were all researchers from the "hard" sciences, but For the past three decades, Mittermeier has been a leader in they perceived conservation to be a negative. The Duke ad- promoting biodiversity conservation in Brazil and has con- ministration had similar views and wanted more emphasis ducted numerous studies on primates and other fauna in the on research and less on conservation. The new Director has country. During his time with the World Wildlife Fund three years to make that happen.
  • Plethodontohyla Laevis (Boettger, 1913) and Transfer of Rhombophryne Alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the Genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae)

    Plethodontohyla Laevis (Boettger, 1913) and Transfer of Rhombophryne Alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the Genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae)

    Zoosyst. Evol. 94(1) 2018, 109–135 | DOI 10.3897/zse.94.14698 museum für naturkunde Resurrection and re-description of Plethodontohyla laevis (Boettger, 1913) and transfer of Rhombophryne alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae) Adriana Bellati1,*, Mark D. Scherz2,*, Steven Megson3, Sam Hyde Roberts4, Franco Andreone5, Gonçalo M. Rosa6,7,8, Jean Noël9, Jasmin E. Randrianirina10, Mauro Fasola1, Frank Glaw2, Angelica Crottini11 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università di Pavia, Via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia, Italy 2 Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 München, Germany 3 School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK 4 SEED Madagascar, Studio 7, 1A Beethoven Street, London, W10 4LG, UK 5 Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Sezione di Zoologia, Via G. Giolitti, 36, I-10123, Torino, Italy 6 Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno NV 89557, USA 7 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK 8 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal 9 Madagascar Fauna and Flora Group, BP 442, Morafeno, Toamasina 501, Madagascar 10 Parc Botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza, BP 4096, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 11 CIBIO, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, Nº 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal http://zoobank.org/AFA6C1FE-1627-408B-9684-F6240716C62B Corresponding author: Angelica Crottini ([email protected]) Abstract Received 26 June 2017 The systematics of the cophyline microhylid frog genera Plethodontohyla and Rhom- Accepted 19 January 2018 bophryne have long been intertwined, and their relationships have only recently started Published 2 February 2018 to become clear.
  • MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Custom Trip

    MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Custom Trip

    MADAGASCAR: The Wonders of the “8th Continent” A Tropical Birding Custom Trip October 20—November 6, 2016 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken during this trip by Ken Behrens Annotated bird list by Jerry Connolly TOUR SUMMARY Madagascar has long been a core destination for Tropical Birding, and with the opening of a satellite office in the country several years ago, we further solidified our expertise in the “Eighth Continent.” This custom trip followed an itinerary similar to that of our main set-departure tour. Although this trip had a definite bird bias, it was really a general natural history tour. We took our time in observing and photographing whatever we could find, from lemurs to chameleons to bizarre invertebrates. Madagascar is rich in wonderful birds, and we enjoyed these to the fullest. But its mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and insects are just as wondrous and accessible, and a trip that ignored them would be sorely missing out. We also took time to enjoy the cultural riches of Madagascar, the small villages full of smiling children, the zebu carts which seem straight out of the Middle Ages, and the ingeniously engineered rice paddies. If you want to come to Madagascar and see it all… come with Tropical Birding! Madagascar is well known to pose some logistical challenges, especially in the form of the national airline Air Madagascar, but we enjoyed perfectly smooth sailing on this tour. We stayed in the most comfortable hotels available at each stop on the itinerary, including some that have just recently opened, and savored some remarkably good food, which many people rank as the best Madagascar Custom Tour October 20-November 6, 2016 they have ever had on any birding tour.
  • A Comprehensive Multilocus Phylogeny of the Neotropical Cotingas

    A Comprehensive Multilocus Phylogeny of the Neotropical Cotingas

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 81 (2014) 120–136 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae, Aves) with a comparative evolutionary analysis of breeding system and plumage dimorphism and a revised phylogenetic classification ⇑ Jacob S. Berv 1, Richard O. Prum Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208105, New Haven, CT 06520, USA article info abstract Article history: The Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae: Aves) are a group of passerine birds that are characterized by Received 18 April 2014 extreme diversity in morphology, ecology, breeding system, and behavior. Here, we present a compre- Revised 24 July 2014 hensive phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas based on six nuclear and mitochondrial loci (7500 bp) Accepted 6 September 2014 for a sample of 61 cotinga species in all 25 genera, and 22 species of suboscine outgroups. Our taxon sam- Available online 16 September 2014 ple more than doubles the number of cotinga species studied in previous analyses, and allows us to test the monophyly of the cotingas as well as their intrageneric relationships with high resolution. We ana- Keywords: lyze our genetic data using a Bayesian species tree method, and concatenated Bayesian and maximum Phylogenetics likelihood methods, and present a highly supported phylogenetic hypothesis. We confirm the monophyly Bayesian inference Species-tree of the cotingas, and present the first phylogenetic evidence for the relationships of Phibalura flavirostris as Sexual selection the sister group to Ampelion and Doliornis, and the paraphyly of Lipaugus with respect to Tijuca.
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian

    Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian

    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
  • Flora Ecopower Holding AG in Madagascar

    Flora Ecopower Holding AG in Madagascar

    Flora Ecopower Holding AG in Madagascar An Independent Report Considering Potential Social and Environmental Impacts of Castor Plantations for the Mandrare Valley, Southern Madagascar. Figure 1 : Castor Plantation at Elonty (top), Castor Fruits (bottom left) FloraEcopower Local Employee with Castor Bean Harvest (bottom right). Barry Ferguson Final Version 30th June 2008 Flora Ecopower in Madagascar : Potential Social & Environmental Impacts 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Context : Flora Ecopower AG, a German Biofuel company has conducted a feasibility study for the industrial scale cultivation of castor (Ricinus minnimus) in the Mandrare Valley, southern Madagascar. 80 hectares of plantations were established in the communes of Tsivory, Elonty, Mahaly and Sampona between November 2007 and May 2008. This final independent report completed on 30th June 2008. 1.2 Methods : The author accompanied three staff members of Flora Ecopower to visit two field sites in Elonty and Tivory. In addition semi-structured interviews were held with the senior employee present, and the author was a passive participant in a village information meeting. The author was also invited to meet Mr Ayal Hovev who is responsible for business development in FloraEcopower and Mr Maydad Hovev founder of the Hovev Agriculture Group and board member of Flora Ecopower. The draft of the report was made available to the company for comment, correction and clarification prior to being made public. The company kindly made a formal response. 1.3 Feasibility Study Operations: Flora Ecopower was allowed to use the 80 hectares of lands for the 6-8 months of the pilot for free. Lands were not in cultivation prior to their use, and were ploughed using a combination of tractor and ox drawn ploughs.
  • Compte Rendu Final D'execution De Projet

    Compte Rendu Final D'execution De Projet

    COMPTE RENDU FINAL D’EXECUTION DE PROJET I. INFORMATIONS DE BASE Nom de l’organisation : Centre Ecologique de Libanona Titre du projet : Community Forest Management of the Tandroy Forests of Southern Madagascar Dates de projet (comme indiqué dans l'accord) : le 1 novembre 2002 – le 30 avril 2004 Date du rapport (mois/annéé): Août 10, 2005 II. REMARQUES PRÉLIMINAIRES Fournir toute remarque préliminaire susceptible d’aider à l’examen de ce compte rendu. I- Remarques Initially the concept of the project had been to work across 4 of the sub-prefectures of Androy (Amboasary, Ambovombe, Tsiombe, Beloha), however at the outset of the implementation phase of this project several factors dictated that the work be limited to the subprefecture nearest to Fort Dauphin, namely Amboasary where the project team worked in 4 communes. (These mitigating factors included a prolonged drought in the Central and Western parts of Androy, lack of capacity in the forest service personnel in the central and western part of Androy and diminished logistical support from the major project partner WWF (due to the scaling down of their Ala Maiky Programme)). Additionally to this change the project over-ran its initial proposed implementation period due to startup and fieldwork taking longer than expected and due to various delays imposed by the forest service. II- Objectif du projet Indicateur Situation actuelle Objectif : L’objectif du projet est que le plan d’action pour la A series of workshops were held in Ambovombe (July conservation participative régionale est adopte par 2003) and Amboasary (Janvier 2004) with all the major les acteurs de conservation dans la région Androy conservation stakeholders in Androy (ANGAP, AFAFI, et qu’un méthode efficace sur le transfert de gestion ASOS, CIREEF, WWF, CGDIS, ALT ENERGIE, CNRE, des ressources naturelles utilisant une CI, TCT, CRD, PACT, KIOMBA, Local district authorities).
  • MAHAJANGA BV Reçus: 246 Sur 246

    MAHAJANGA BV Reçus: 246 Sur 246

    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 4 MAHAJANGA BV reçus: 246 sur 246 INDEPE TIM MANAR AREMA MAPAR HVM NDANT ANARA : FANILO N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E ASSOCI REGION 41 BETSIBOKA BV reçus 39 sur 39 DISTRICT: 4101 KANDREHO BV reçus7 sur 7 01 AMBALIHA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 02 ANDASIBE 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 4 03 ANTANIMBARIBE 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 3 04 BEHAZOMATY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 05 BETAIMBOAY 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 06 KANDREHO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 07 MAHATSINJO SUD 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 42 40 0 40 0 11 0 1 1 27 DISTRICT: 4102 MAEVATANANA BV reçus19 sur 19 01 AMBALAJIA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 1 02 AMBALANJANAKOMBY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 3 03 ANDRIBA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 4 04 ANTANIMBARY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 7 05 ANTSIAFABOSITRA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 5 06 BEANANA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 07 BEMOKOTRA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 1 2 08 BERATSIMANINA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 09 BERIVOTRA 5/5 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 10 MADIROMIRAFY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 4 11 MAEVATANANA I 0 0 10 9 0 9 0 3 0 0 2 4 12 MAEVATANANA II 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 6 13 MAHATSINJO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 14 MAHAZOMA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 4 15 MANGABE 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 5 16 MARIA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 3 17 MAROKORO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 4 18 MORAFENO 0 0 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 19 TSARARANO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 2 3 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 134 125 0 125 0 33 0 0 15 77 DISTRICT: 4103 TSARATANANA BV reçus13 sur 13 01 AMBAKIRENY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 4 02 AMPANDRANA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 03 ANDRIAMENA 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 3 04
  • Résultats Détaillés Toliary

    Résultats Détaillés Toliary

    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 6 TOLIARY BV reçus: 304 sur 304 HVM IND OBAMA FITIBA AVOTS AREMA MAPAR IND IND TIM IND IND MONIM AJFO E OMBILA MIARA- MASOA TSIMAN A TANIND HY DIA NDRO AVAKE N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E RAZA MAHER Y REGION 61 ANDROY BV reçus 58 sur 58 DISTRICT: 6101 AMBOVOMBE ANDROY BV reçus21 sur 21 01 AMBANISARIKA 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 AMBAZOA 0 0 8 7 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 03 AMBOHIMALAZA 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04 AMBONAIVO 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 05 AMBONDRO 0 0 8 7 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 AMBOVOMBE ANDRO 1 0 12 12 2 10 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 07 AMPAMATA 1 0 8 8 1 7 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 08 ANALAMARY 0 0 6 6 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 09 ANDALATANOSY 0 0 8 7 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 ANDOHARANO 1 0 6 5 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ANDRAGNANIVO 0 0 6 6 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 ANJEKY ANKILIKIRA 1 0 8 8 1 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 ANTANIMORA SUD 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 ERADA 0 0 8 8 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 15 IMANOMBO 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 16 JAFARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 17 MAROALOMAINTE 1 0 8 8 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 18 MAROALOPOTY 0 7 8 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 MAROVATO BEFENO 0 0 8 7 0 7 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 SIHANAMARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 TSIMANANADA 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL DISTRICT 5 7 166 160 18 142 91 1 0 0 2 1 3 7 9 0 0 0 28 DISTRICT: 6102 BEKILY BV reçus20 sur
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use

    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use

    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
  • Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar

    Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar

    EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005.