<<

INSIGHTS on March 7, 2017 http://science.sciencemag.org/

PERSPECTIVES Downloaded from

PALEONTOLOGY story that is beginning to be corroborated by biomechanical studies. According to this story, the development of was chaotic, A Mesozoic with different experimenting with different airborne behaviors using dif- Biomechanical models are key to understanding how ferent and arrangements (see the figure), until ultimately only modern dinosaurs experimented with different ways of flying survived. The growing understanding of the di- By Stephen L. Brusatte of powered flight—that is, active flapping nosaur– transition stems from a trove that generates thrust—has been widely of of early birds and their closest he of birds from a group regarded, sometimes explicitly but often cousins collected over the past of small dinosaurs between 170 mil- implicitly, as a long evolutionary march two decades. Most notable are thousands lion and 150 million ago has in which natural selection progressively emerged as a textbook example of a refined one subgroup of dinosaurs into School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant major evolutionary transformation in ever-better aerialists. However, recent Institute, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK. T the fossil record (1). The attainment discoveries reveal a much more interesting Email: [email protected] MARSHALL TODD ILLUSTRATION: 792 24 FEBRUARY 2017 • VOL 355 ISSUE 6327 sciencemag.org SCIENCE

Published by AAAS

DA_0224Perspectives.indd 792 2/22/17 10:35 AM The paravian dinosaur glides right direction. The authors used several through the canopy on its four . mathematical models to predict whether various winged dinosaurs and early birds of these “protofeathers,” which were soft, could employ various styles of flapping pliable, and arranged in an orderly se- flight seen in modern birds. The verdict: quence (6). In some later meat-eating thero- Except for a handful of paravians, the dino- pods, these simple filaments evolved into saurs did not have the sizes or configu- larger, flattened, branching structures—the rations necessary for powered flight. pennaceous (quill-like) that form Furthermore, looking at trends across the wings of today’s birds. the family tree, Dececchi et al. found no Wings are essential for flight; they are the pattern of progressive refinement in aerial that provide . Thus, it is no sur- ability beginning with the origin of wings. prise that they have been a particular em- This supports the hypothesis that wings phasis of recent research. When the Chinese developed for nonflight reasons (such as fossils began to emerge in the late 1990s, display, brooding, or something else they showed something unexpected: Many entirely) and that their early evolution theropod dinosaurs had wings of varying was not shaped by selection for aerial flap- shapes and sizes, and many advanced par- ping. Only much later, it seems, did some avian , like Microraptor, which are paravians evolve the right combination of closely related to birds, had wings on both small body size, large wings, and other ana- the arms and legs (2). Furthermore, wings tomical features to begin powered flight. It first appeared even earlier in much more was at that point that selection was able to primitive, sheep-to-horse–sized theropod mold these into more effective fly- dinosaurs that are widely held to be too ing machines. large to fly (7). In 2014, Foth et al. proposed There is another twist to Dececchi et al.’s on March 7, 2017 a provocative hypothesis: Wings originally study. Although some paravians like Mi- evolved as display structures and were later croraptor may have been able to power them- repurposed as airfoils (8). selves through the air, the authors found that Testing this hypothesis, however, is diffi- not all paravians had this ability. Nor was cult. How can you demonstrate that some- the common ancestor of paravians and birds thing in a fossil was definitively a display clearly a lift-producing flapper. Coupled with ornament? One clue comes from pigment- the many morphological differences among bearing structures called , winged paravians and early birds, this sug- which have been identified in fossil feathers gests that powered flight may not have been by high-resolution microscopy. The results a singular innovation of the lineage that led reveal that theropod wings were endowed to modern birds, but a behavior that many

with various colors, as might be expected different groups of small, feathered, winged http://science.sciencemag.org/ if they were used for decoration (9). But paravians achieved independently. this does not necessarily confirm that they This idea is bolstered by the discovery, evolved for this purpose. reported by Xu et al. in 2015, of a small Much more fundamental questions re- theropod, called qi, with a -like mem- main, however. For all the buzz about feath- brane of skin stretched between its fingers ered dinosaur discoveries, there is little and body (12). All other known winged

clarity on which dinosaurs could actually dinosaurs have pennaceous feathers. It Downloaded from fly. Answering this requires quantitative seems likely that Yi qi’s skin membrane is biomechanical studies that test whether an airfoil, probably used for , as the different wing and feather configurations, probably didn’t have the wing flex- of Chinese fossils with exquisite details of across a range of dinosaurs, enabled vo- ibility to flap. The unusual construction of feathers and other soft tissues (2). When lant activity—be it powered flight, incipient its wings is striking evidence that different placed together on a family tree, these fos- flapping flight, gliding, or other airborne forms of dinosaur flight evolved in differ- sils show that many anatomical compo- behaviors. This, in turn, would help untan- ent groups. nents of the modern- apparatus gle which dinosaurs could fly, using which The Mesozoic Era (from 252 million to evolved piecemeal over tens of millions of styles, and how flight performance evolved 66 million years ago) must have been aflut- years of dinosaur evolution, for reasons un- across the dinosaur family tree. Most work ter with an aviary of dinosaurs, experiment- related to flight (1, 3). in this area has focused on the four-winged ing with different ways of navigating the air Even the most quintessential avian fea- Microraptor, shown by mathematical and (see the figure). But much work remains to ture of all—feathers—did not evolve as a physical models to have been a capable be done to better understand this heady pe- flight . They began as hairlike glider (10). Microraptor is known from riod of evolution. Mathematical models are filaments, which the earliest dinosaurs ac- many specimens amenable to study, but it a good start, but the next big breakthrough quired, most likely, for insulation (4) or to alone is not a panacea for understanding will come with more advanced anatomical camouflage their bodies (5). Xing et al.’s the origin of flight. We must know more models of early birds and their close dino- stunning discovery of a dinosaur in am- about other winged dinosaurs, too. saur relatives—physical ones (10, 13) that ber, announced in late 2016, gives the first A biomechanical study published last can be subjected to wind-tunnel experi- glimpse at the three-dimensional structure by Dececchi et al. (11) is a step in the ments, and digital ones that can be analyzed

SCIENCE sciencemag.org 24 FEBRUARY 2017 • VOL 355 ISSUE 6327 793

Published by AAAS

DA_0224Perspectives.indd 793 2/22/17 10:35 AM INSIGHTS | PERSPECTIVES

The route from wings to flight PROTEOME Wings evolved in some early dinosaurs, but flight capabilities arose later. It is likely that only birds were capable of full-powered flight. Dinosaurs are not to scale. Quantifying Psittacosaurus Could not ;y protein

Filaments Dilong (dis)order Protofeathers Could not ;y Pennaceous feathers A study of bacteria, yeast, Bat-like skin membrane and mammalian cells maps Ornithomimus Probably could not ;y the melting behavior of cellular proteins

By Christine Vogel Could not ;y wenty-five years ago, Chothia pre- dicted that the structural domains of Yi all proteins can be classified into about Plausible glider 1000 folds (1). Later studies refined this number; however, scientists also found that some proteins or parts of proteins

Protofeathers; on March 7, 2017 could not ;y Tnever assume a specific fold. These regions are called intrinsically unstructured or disor- Dinosaurs Microraptor dered (2). Oncogenes such as p53 or breast Plausible glider/incipient cancer 1 (BRCA1) contain long disordered ;apping ;ight stretches, and aggregation of the disordered Theropods a-synuclein is thought to underlie Parkin- Maniraptoriforms son’s and Alzheimer’s diseases (3, 4). On page Had wings, but Probably could not ;y 812 of this issue, Leuenberger et al. (5) map probably could not ;y the thermodynamic stabilities of more than Pennaraptorans 8000 proteins across four organisms, provid- Had wings; possible ing insights not only into the evolution of incipient ;ight protein structure and expression in cells but http://science.sciencemag.org/ also into possible molecular causes and con- Plausible glider/incipient sequences of human disease. Paravians ;apping ;ight Had wings; possible Many early studies of protein structural incipient ;ight stability relied on careful examination of one protein at a time, studying either its crys- tallographic structure or the temperature- Incipient or more advanced

dependent change in its optical properties, Downloaded from ;apping ;ight such as circular dichroism (CD) (6). Later, Avians (birds) other methods were developed, but they were Had wings; capable either slow, not quantitative, or relied purely of powered ;ight Modern bird on computational predictions (7). Flapping ;ight To provide a faster and experimental al- ternative, Feng et al. previously developed a method that uses ’s way of assessing computationally. This marriage of paleon- 3. S. L. Brusatte, G. T. Lloyd, S. C. Wang, M. A. Norell, Curr. Biol. protein structural stability by coupling lim- tology and engineering will lead to a much 24, 2386 (2014). ited proteolysis with mass spectrometry (LiP- 4. J. Clarke, Science 340, 690 (2013). sharper picture of which aerial behaviors 5. J. Vinther et al., Curr. Biol. 26, 2456 (2016). MS) (8). If a protein is structurally stable, these long-extinct species were capable of. It 6. L. Xing et al., Curr. Biol. 26, 3352 (2016). then digestion enzymes such as proteases will also bring more clarity on how the pow- 7. D. K. Zelenitsky et al., Science 338, 510 (2012). will have a difficult time attacking the pro- 8. C. Foth, H. Tischlinger, O. W. M. Rauhut, Nature 511, 79 ered flight system of today’s birds emerged (2014). tein. If the protein is less stable, the protease from the great anatomical and behavioral 9. Q. Li et al., Nature 507, 350 (2014). will digest more. The fragments produced by complexity of their dinosaur ancestors. j 10. G. Dyke et al., Nat. Comm. 4, 2489 (2013). the protease can then be identified with high- 11. T. A. Dececchi, H. C. E. Larsson, M. B. Habib, PeerJ 4, e2159 (2016). resolution MS, allowing the protein’s stability SCIENCE REFERENCES 12. X. Xu et al., Nature 521, 70 (2015). 1. X. Xu et al., Science 346, 1253293 (2014). 13. D. Evangelista et al., PeerJ 2, e632 (2014). 2. L. M. Chiappe, Q. Meng, Birds of Stone: Chinese Avian New York University, Center for Genomics and Systems Fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs (Johns Hopkins Univ. Biology, Department of Biology, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Press, 2016). 10.1126/science.aal2397 Email: [email protected] CARY/ N. GRAPHIC:

794 24 FEBRUARY 2017 • VOL 355 ISSUE 6327 sciencemag.org SCIENCE

Published by AAAS

DA_0224Perspectives.indd 794 2/22/17 10:35 AM