DOCSLIB.ORG

ATLAS TUMBUHAN SULAWESI SELATAN Edisi: Sungai Pattunuang Asue Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Desa Samangki, Kecamatan Simbang, Kabupaten Maros

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ATLAS TUMBUHAN SULAWESI SELATAN Edisi: Sungai Pattunuang Asue Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Desa Samangki, Kecamatan Simbang, Kabupaten Maros ATLAS TUMBUHAN SULAWESI SELATAN Edisi: Sungai Pattunuang Asue Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Desa Samangki, Kecamatan Simbang, Kabupaten Maros Editor: Nani Kurnia Oslan Jumadi Jurusan Biologi FMIPA | 1 ATLAS TUMBUHAN SULAWESI SELATAN Edisi: Sungai Pattunuang Asue Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Desa Samangki, Kecamatan Simbang, Kabupaten Maros TIM KKN-KP Biologi UNM 2015 Penerbit Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM Kampus UNM Parangtambung Jalan Mallengkeri Raya Makassar Email: [email protected] Jurusan Biologi FMIPA | i Atlas Tumbuhan Sulawesi Selatan Edisi: Sungai Pattunuang Asue Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung, Desa Samangki, Kecamatan Simbang, Kabupaten Maros. Tim KKN-KP Biologi UNM 2015 ISBN : 978-602-52965-2-9 Editor Nani Kurnia Oslan Jumadi Penerbit Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM Redaksi: Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM Kampus UNM Parangtambung Jalan Mallengkeri Raya Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan Email: [email protected] 2019 Jurusan Biologi FMIPA | ii KATA PENGANTAR Puji syukur kami panjatkan kehadirat Tuhan Yang Maha Esa, karena dengan pertolongan-Nya kami dapat menyelesaikan buku yang berjudul ‘‘Atlas Tumbuhan Sulawesi Selatan, Edisi: Sungai Pattunuang Asue, Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung Desa Samangki, Kecamatan Simbang, Kabupaten Maros’’, yang merupakan edisi kedua dari rangkaian Atlas Tumbuhan Sulawesi Selatan. Adapun, kontributor buku ini adalah mahasiswa Program Studi Biologi UNM yang tergabung dalam pekasanaan KKN-KP pada tahun 2015. Dalam kesempatan ini kami menyampaikan rasa terima kasih kami haturkan kepada Prof. Dr Abdul Rahman selaku Dekan FMIPA UNM pada masa 2015-2019 dan Dr. Mushawwir Taiyeb, M.Kes, sebagai Ketua Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM masa jabatan 2012-2016 yang telah memfasilitasi pelaksanaan kegiatan KKN-KP mahasiswa Program Studi Biologi FMIPA UNM. Akhir kata, besar harapan kami, buku ini dapat memberi manfaat dan mendukung program pelestarian keanekaragama hayati, khususnya di Sulawesi Selatan. Makassar, 2019 Editor Jurusan Biologi FMIPA | iii DAFTAR ISI KATA PENGANTAR .................................................................................. iii DAFTAR ISI ................................................................................................ iv POHON ......................................................................................................... 1 Aegle marmelos ............................................................................................. 2 Anacardium occidentale ................................................................................ 4 Aquilaria malaccensis ................................................................................... 6 Arenga pinnata .............................................................................................. 8 Artocarpus communis .................................................................................. 10 Artocarpus heterophyllus............................................................................. 12 Bauhinia acuminate ..................................................................................... 16 Beilschmiedia tawa ...................................................................................... 18 Bixa orellana L. ........................................................................................... 20 Brucea javanica ........................................................................................... 22 Cassia alata L. ............................................................................................. 24 Ceiba Pentandra .......................................................................................... 26 Citrus aurantifolia ....................................................................................... 28 Citrus maxima .............................................................................................. 30 Cocos nucifera ............................................................................................. 32 Dendrocnide stimulans ................................................................................ 34 Erythroxylum acranthum ............................................................................. 36 Flacourtia inermis ....................................................................................... 38 Gliricidia sepium ......................................................................................... 40 Gmelina arborea .......................................................................................... 42 Gossypium herbaceum ................................................................................. 44 Guazuma ulmifolia ...................................................................................... 46 Gustavia augusta ......................................................................................... 48 Hibiscus tiliaceus L. .................................................................................... 50 Homalium foetidum ..................................................................................... 52 Jatropha curcas ........................................................................................... 54 Jurusan Biologi FMIPA | iv Leea indica................................................................................................... 56 Leucaena leucocephala ............................................................................... 58 Macaranga trichocarpa ............................................................................... 60 Mangifera indica ......................................................................................... 62 Micromelum minutum .................................................................................. 64 Morinda citrifolia ........................................................................................ 66 Moringa pterigosperma ............................................................................... 68 Nephelium lappaceum ................................................................................. 70 Pandanus tectorius ...................................................................................... 72 Polyalthia longifolia .................................................................................... 74 Protium javanicum....................................................................................... 76 Psidium guajava L. ...................................................................................... 78 Salacca edulis .............................................................................................. 80 Schefflera grandiflora .................................................................................. 82 Shorea bentongensis .................................................................................... 84 Syzygium aquieum ....................................................................................... 86 Syzygium oleana .......................................................................................... 88 Terminalia catappa ...................................................................................... 90 Tetracera scandens ...................................................................................... 92 Tetramerista glabra ..................................................................................... 94 Theobroma cacao ........................................................................................ 96 Trema orientalis .......................................................................................... 98 Jenis Pohon yang Tidak Teridentifikasi .................................................... 100 SEMAK ..................................................................................................... 120 Adiantum cuneatum ................................................................................... 121 Breynia oblongifolia .................................................................................. 123 Caryota mitis ............................................................................................. 125 Cassia tora L ............................................................................................. 127 Chassalia curviflora .................................................................................. 129 Chromolaena odorata L ............................................................................ 131 Codiaeum variegatum ................................................................................ 133 Jurusan Biologi FMIPA | v Davallia triphylla....................................................................................... 135 Dryopteris carthusiana .............................................................................. 137 Rhinacanthus nasutus L ............................................................................. 139 Hyptis capitata Jacq .................................................................................. 141 Ixora hookeri ............................................................................................. 143 Justicia gendarussa Burn .......................................................................... 145 Lantana camara L ..................................................................................... 147 Lycopodium cernuum L ............................................................................. 149 Lygodium scandens ................................................................................... 151 Lygodium longifolium ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TML Propagation Protocols
    PROPAGATION PROTOCOLS This document is intended as a guide for Tamborine Mountain Landcare members who wish to assist our regeneration projects by growing some of the plants needed. It is a work in progress so if you have anything to add to the protocols – for example a different but successful way of propagating and growing a particular plant – then please give it to Julie Lake so she can add it to the document. The idea is that our shared knowledge and experience can become a valuable part of TML's intellectual property as well as a useful source of knowledge for members. As there are many hundreds of plants native to Tamborine Mountain, the protocols list will take a long time to complete, with growing information for each plant added alphabetically as time permits. While the list is being compiled by those members with competence in this field, any TML member with a query about propagating a particular plant can post it on the website for other me mb e r s to answer. To date, only protocols for trees and shrubs have been compiled. Vines and ferns will be added later. Fruiting times given are usual for the species but many rainforest plants flower and fruit opportunistically, according to weather and other conditions unknown to us, thus fruit can be produced at any time of year. Finally, if anyone would like a copy of the protocols, contact Julie on [email protected] and she’ll send you one. ………………….. Growing from seed This is the best method for most plants destined for regeneration projects for it is usually fast, easy and ensures genetic diversity in the regenerated landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterocarpaceae)
    DNA Sequence-Based Identification and Molecular Phylogeny Within Subfamily Dipterocarpoideae (Dipterocarpaceae) Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) at Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Büsgen Institute Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology Georg-August-Universität Göttingen By Essy Harnelly (Born in Banda Aceh, Indonesia) Göttingen, 2013 Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey Referee : Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey Co-referee : Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft Date of Disputation : 09.01.2013 2 To My Family 3 Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. Dr. Reiner Finkeldey for accepting me as his PhD student, for his support, helpful advice and guidance throughout my study. I am very grateful that he gave me this valuable chance to join his highly motivated international working group. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft and Prof. Dr. Raphl Mitlöhner, who agreed to be my co-referee and member of examination team. I am grateful to Dr. Kathleen Prinz for her guidance, advice and support throughout my research as well as during the writing process. My deepest thankfulness goes to Dr. Sarah Seifert (in memoriam) for valuable discussion of my topic, summary translation and proof reading. I would also acknowledge Dr. Barbara Vornam for her guidance and numerous valuable discussions about my research topic. I would present my deep appreciation to Dr. Amarylis Vidalis, for her brilliant ideas to improve my understanding of my project. My sincere thanks are to Prof. Dr. Elizabeth Gillet for various enlightening discussions not only about the statistical matter, but also my health issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Barcoding Sequences for the Construction of Phylogenetic Relationships in the Euphorbiaceae
    University of Padova Department of Land, Environment Agriculture and Forestry MSc in Mediterranean Forestry and Natural Resources Management The use of barcoding sequences for the construction of phylogenetic relationships in the Euphorbiaceae Supervisor: Alessandro Vannozzi Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Oliver Gailing Submitted by: Bikash Kharel Matriculation No. 1177536 ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018 Acknowledgments This dissertation has come to this positive end through the collective efforts of several people and organizations: from rural peasants to highly academic personnel and institutions around the world. Without their mental, physical and financial support this research would not have been possible. I would like to express my gratitude to all of them who were involved directly or indirectly in this endeavor. To all of them, I express my deep appreciation. Firstly, I am thankful to Prof. Dr. Oliver Gailing for providing me the opportunity to conduct my thesis on this topic. I greatly appreciate my supervisor Alessandro Vannozzi for providing the vision regarding Forest Genetics and DNA barcoding. My cordial thanks and heartfelt gratitude goes to him whose encouragements, suggestions and comments made this research possible to shape in this form. I am also thankful to Prof. Dr. Konstantin V. Krutovsky for his guidance in each and every step of this research especially helping me with the CodonCode software and reviewing the thesis. I also want to thank Erasmus Mundus Programme for providing me with a scholarship for pursuing Master’s degree in Mediterranean Forestry and Natural Resources Management (MEDFOR) course. Besides this, I would like to thank all my professors who broadened my knowledge during the period of my study in University of Lisbon and University of Padova.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalechampia COM ÊNFASE EM Dalechampia Sect
    RAFAELA ALVES PEREIRA DA SILVA FILOGENIA E TAXONOMIA DE Dalechampia COM ÊNFASE EM Dalechampia sect. Dalechampia, Euphorbiaceae RECIFE 2019 I RAFAELA ALVES PEREIRA DA SILVA FILOGENIA E TAXONOMIA DE Dalechampia COM ÊNFASE EM Dalechampia sect. Dalechampia, Euphorbiaceae Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Botânica. Orientadora: Profª. Dra. Margareth Ferreira de Sales Deptº de Biologia, Área de Botânica/UFRPE Co-orientadores: Dra. Sarah Maria Athiê-Souza Profº. Dr. Luís Gustavo Rodrigues de Souza Colaborador: Dr. Scott Armbruster Profº. Dr. André Laurênio de Melo RECIFE 2019 II Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas da UFRPE Biblioteca Central, Recife-PE, Brasil S586f Silva, Rafaela Alves Pereira da. Filogenia e taxonomia de Dalechampia com ênfase em Dalechampia sect. Dalechampia, Euphorbiaceae / Rafaela Alves Pereira da Silva. – Recife, 2019. 335 f.: il. Orientador(a): Margareth Ferreira de Sales. Coorientador(a): Sarah Maria Athiê-Souza Coorientador(a): Luís Gustavo Rodrigues de Souza Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Recife, BR-PE, 2019. Inclui referências e apêndice(s). 1. Dalechampiinae 2. Biogeography 3. Molecular 4. Character evolution I. Sales, Margareth Ferreira de, orient. II. Athiê-Souza, Sarah Maria, coorient. III Souza, Luís Gustavo Rodrigues de, coorient. IV. Título CDD 581 III FILOGENIA E TAXONOMIA DE Dalechampia COM ÊNFASE EM Dalechampia sect. Dalechampia, Euphorbiaceae IV Dedico Ao Espírito Santo de Deus. Ofereço A Ednaldo José da Silva “Ignore aquele que diz: você não tem valor por isso ou por aquilo, porque eu te amo muito e torço por você”.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis and Typification of Mexican and Central American
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 120B Autor(en)/Author(s): Berger Andreas Artikel/Article: Synopsis and typification of Mexican and Central American Palicourea (Rubiaceae: Palicoureeae), part I: The entomophilous species 59-140 ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.zobodat.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 120 59–140 Wien, Jänner 2018 Synopsis and typification of Mexican and Central American Palicourea (Rubiaceae: Palicoureeae), part I: The entomophilous species A. Berger* Abstract The prominent but complex genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae: Psychotrieae) is one of the largest genera of flow- ering plants and its generic circumscription has been controversial for a long time. Recent DNA-phyloge- netic studies in combination with a re-evaluation of morphological characters have led to a disintegration process that peaked in the segregation of hundreds of species into various genera within the new sister tribe Palicoureeae. These studies have also shown that species of Psychotria subg. Heteropsychotria are nested within Palicourea, which was traditionally separated by showing an ornithophilous (vs. entomophilous) pol- lination syndrome. In order to render the genera Palicourea and Psychotria monophyletic groups, all species of subg. Heteropsychotria have to be transferred to Palicourea and various authors and publications have provided some of the necessary combinations. In the course of ongoing research on biotic interactions and chemodiversity of the latter genus, the need for a comprehensive and modern compilation of species of Pali­ courea in its new circumscription became apparent. As first step towards such a synopsis, the entomophilous Mexican and Central American species (the traditional concept of Psychotria subg.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Evolutionary Relationships Between Pollination and Protective Mutualisms in the Genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae)( Dissertat
    Evolutionary relationships between pollination and protective Title mutualisms in the genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae)( Dissertation_全文 ) Author(s) Yamasaki, Eri Citation 京都大学 Issue Date 2014-03-24 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k18113 学位規則第9条第2項により要約公開; 許諾条件により本文 Right は2019-06-25に公開 Type Thesis or Dissertation Textversion ETD Kyoto University Evolutionary relationships between pollination and protective mutualisms in the genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) Eri Yamasaki 2014 1 2 Contents 摘要.…………………………………………………………………………………..5 Summary.……………………………………………………………………………..9 Chapter 1 General introduction……………………………………………………………….14 Chapter 2 Diversity of pollination systems in Macaranga Section 2.1 Diversity of bracteole morphology in Macaranga ………………………….20 Section 2.2 Wind and insect pollination (ambophily) in Mallotus , a sister group of Macaranga …………..…………..……...…………..………………………...31 Section 2.3 Disk-shaped nectaries on bracteoles of Macaranga sinensis provide a reward for pollinators……………………………….………………………………...45 Chapter 3 Interactions among plants, pollinators and guard ants in ant-plant Macaranga Section 3.1 Density of ant guards on inflorescences and their effects on herbivores and pollinators…………………………………………………….......................56 Section 3.2 Anal secretions of pollinator thrips of Macaranga winkleri repel guard ants…….71 Chapter 4 General discussion.………………….……………………………………………...85 Appendix…………………………………………………………………….………89 Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………….…...101 Literature cited……………………………….…………………………………….103
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Reconstruction Prompts Taxonomic Changes in Sauropus, Synostemon and Breynia (Phyllanthaceae Tribe Phyllantheae)
    Blumea 59, 2014: 77–94 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651914X684484 Phylogenetic reconstruction prompts taxonomic changes in Sauropus, Synostemon and Breynia (Phyllanthaceae tribe Phyllantheae) P.C. van Welzen1,2, K. Pruesapan3, I.R.H. Telford4, H.-J. Esser 5, J.J. Bruhl4 Key words Abstract Previous molecular phylogenetic studies indicated expansion of Breynia with inclusion of Sauropus s.str. (excluding Synostemon). The present study adds qualitative and quantitative morphological characters to molecular Breynia data to find more resolution and/or higher support for the subgroups within Breynia s.lat. However, the results show molecular phylogeny that combined molecular and morphological characters provide limited synergy. Morphology confirms and makes the morphology infrageneric groups recognisable within Breynia s.lat. The status of the Sauropus androgynus complex is discussed. Phyllanthaceae Nomenclatural changes of Sauropus species to Breynia are formalised. The genus Synostemon is reinstated. Sauropus Synostemon Published on 1 September 2014 INTRODUCTION Sauropus in the strict sense (excluding Synostemon; Pruesapan et al. 2008, 2012) and Breynia are two closely related tropical A phylogenetic analysis of tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae) Asian-Australian genera with up to 52 and 35 species, respec- using DNA sequence data by Kathriarachchi et al. (2006) pro- tively (Webster 1994, Govaerts et al. 2000a, b, Radcliffe-Smith vided a backbone phylogeny for Phyllanthus L. and related 2001). Sauropus comprises mainly herbs and shrubs, whereas genera. Their study recommended subsuming Breynia L. (in- species of Breynia are always shrubs. Both genera share bifid cluding Sauropus Blume), Glochidion J.R.Forst. & G.Forst., or emarginate styles, non-apiculate anthers, smooth seeds and and Synostemon F.Muell.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazrin Full Phd Thesis (150246576
    Maintenance and conservation of Dipterocarp diversity in tropical forests _______________________________________________ Mohammad Nazrin B Abdul Malik A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Science Department of Animal and Plant Sciences November 2019 1 i Thesis abstract Many theories and hypotheses have been developed to explain the maintenance of diversity in plant communities, particularly in hyperdiverse tropical forests. Maintenance of the composition and diversity of tropical forests is vital, especially species of high commercial value. I focus on the high value dipterocarp timber species of Malaysia and Borneo as these have been extensive logged owing to increased demands from global timber trade. In this thesis, I explore the drivers of diversity of this group, as well as the determinants of global abundance, conservation and timber value. The most widely supported hypothesis for explaining tropical diversity is the Janzen Connell hypothesis. I experimentally tested the key elements of this, namely density and distance dependence, in two dipterocarp species. The results showed that different species exhibited different density and distance dependence effects. To further test the strength of this hypothesis, I conducted a meta-analysis combining multiple studies across tropical and temperate study sites, and with many species tested. It revealed significant support for the Janzen- Connell predictions in terms of distance and density dependence. Using a phylogenetic comparative approach, I highlight how environmental adaptation affects dipterocarp distribution, and the relationships of plant traits with ecological factors and conservation status. This analysis showed that environmental and ecological factors are related to plant traits and highlights the need for dipterocarp conservation priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Among Leaf Miners, Host Plants and Parasitoids in Australian Subtropical Rainforest
    Food Webs along Elevational Gradients: Interactions among Leaf Miners, Host Plants and Parasitoids in Australian Subtropical Rainforest Author Maunsell, Sarah Published 2014 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3017 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/368145 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Food webs along elevational gradients: interactions among leaf miners, host plants and parasitoids in Australian subtropical rainforest Sarah Maunsell BSc (Hons) Griffith School of Environment Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2014 Synopsis Gradients in elevation are used to understand how species respond to changes in local climatic conditions and are therefore a powerful tool for predicting how mountain ecosystems may respond to climate change. While many studies have shown elevational patterns in species richness and species turnover, little is known about how multi- species interactions respond to elevation. An understanding of how species interactions are affected by current clines in climate is imperative if we are to make predictions about how ecosystem function and stability will be affected by climate change. This challenge has been addressed here by focussing on a set of intimately interacting species: leaf-mining insects, their host plants and their parasitoid predators. Herbivorous insects, including leaf miners, and their host plants and parasitoids interact in diverse and complex ways, but relatively little is known about how the nature and strengths of these interactions change along climatic gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition of the Vegetation Along the Sherichhu River, Lower Montane Area of Eastern Bhutan
    Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 39 (3), 303-316, May - Jun. 2017 http://www.sjst.psu.ac.th Original Article Species composition of the vegetation along the Sherichhu River, lower montane area of Eastern Bhutan Tenzin Jamtsho1* and Kitichate Sridith2 1 Yangchenphug Higher Secondary School, Ministry of Education, Thimphu, Bhutan 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110 Thailand Receive: 28 March 2016; Revised: 22 May 2016; Accepted: 27 May 2016 Abstract An investigation of the riparian vegetation along the Sherichhu River, lower montane area of Eastern Bhutan was conducted from April to December 2015 to explore the plant communities in terms of species composition. A total number of 18 plots were placed within the remnant patches of the vegetation on either side of the river. In total, 172 species of vascular plant has been recorded. The cluster analysis suggested four types of plant communities in the study area viz., the Mallotus- Desmodium-Rhus shrubland and the Syzygium venosum woodland communities, which are located in V-shaped valleys and the Albizia-Flueggea woodland and Quercus glauca woodland communities located in U-shaped valleys. In broad-spectrum, the topographic features and environmental variables i.e. litter accumulation and flooding condition might also have some impact on the species composition of the plant communities of this vegetation. Keywords: Sherichhu River, Bhutan, riparian vegetation, species composition, litter thickness 1. Introduction species of both sub-tropical and temperate genera (Roder & Frei, 2013). In any case, only few studies are concerned about Bhutan is positioned within the fledgling mountain the vegetation accounting mainly on the temperate and alpine range of the Eastern Himalayas with an area of 38,394 km2.
    [Show full text]