DOCSLIB.ORG

Kosovo: No Good Alternatives to the Ahtisaari Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kosovo: No Good Alternatives to the Ahtisaari Plan KOSOVO: NO GOOD ALTERNATIVES TO THE AHTISAARI PLAN Europe Report N°182 – 14 May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. THE AHTISAARI PLAN AT THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL.............................. 1 A. THE STATE OF THE STATUS DEBATE .....................................................................................1 1. The road to Ahtisaari’s supervised independence plan............................................1 2. The Security Council: options and dynamics........................................................ 3 3. The case against delay .......................................................................................... 6 4. The precedent issue: Kosovo as a unique case...................................................... 7 B. WHY PARTITION IS NOT A SOLUTION......................................................................................8 1. The Ahtisaari plan: a multi-ethnic, decentralised society...................................... 8 2. The EU objective: a multi-ethnic Balkans ............................................................ 9 3. The partition alternative: who supports it ........................................................... 10 4. The partition alternative: why it should be rejected ............................................ 14 C. OVERCOMING RUSSIA’S CONCERNS......................................................................................15 II. HOW THE AHTISAARI PLAN SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED ........................ 17 A. BETWEEN STATEHOOD AND PROTECTORATE.......................................................................18 1. Power sharing..................................................................................................... 18 2. Legal hurdles...................................................................................................... 19 3. No quick security handover ................................................................................ 20 B. A UNIFIED STATE OR SLOW-MOTION DIVISION? ...................................................................21 1. Control over the territory.................................................................................... 21 2. One society? ....................................................................................................... 22 3. Decentralisation and the phantom Serb entity..................................................... 24 III. SECURING COMPLIANCE ON THE GROUND ................................................... 25 A. SECURING KOSOVO ALBANIANS’ COMPLIANCE ..................................................................25 1. The window of opportunity ................................................................................ 25 2. Weak political organisation ................................................................................ 28 3. Kosovo Albanian attitudes to Kosovo’s territorial patchwork ............................ 29 B. SECURING KOSOVO SERBS’ COMPLIANCE .............................................................................32 1. Enclave Serbs..................................................................................................... 33 2. Serbs in the north................................................................................................ 35 3. A bridging political organisation? ...................................................................... 35 C. SECURING BELGRADE’S COMPLIANCE ................................................................................36 APPENDICES A. MAP OF KOSOVO AND ENVIRONS........................................................................................39 B. MAP OF AHTISAARI’S PLANNED MUNICIPAL REARRANGEMENTS OF THE MITROVICA AREA .......40 C. MAP OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN KOSOVO AND ITS PROJECTED MUNICIPAL REARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................................41 D. EVOLUTION OF KOSOVO STATUS ........................................................................................42 E. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP .......................................................................45 F. INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON EUROPE................................46 G. INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES.........................................................47 Europe Report N°182 14 May 2007 KOSOVO: NO GOOD ALTERNATIVES TO THE AHTISAARI PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The debate on Kosovo’s future status has reached a meaningful and concrete autonomy arrangements. Instead crucial point. The United Nations Security Council it has tried to establish the basis for an ethnic division of (UNSC) has begun to consider elements of a draft Kosovo and partition along the Ibar River, which runs resolution to determine the entity’s future, which could through the northern city of Mitrovica. It has done so by be put to a vote in the coming weeks. The best way of trying to delay the adoption of a Security Council resolution ensuring regional peace and stability and lifting Kosovo in the expectation that this would trigger a Kosovo out of an eight-year-long limbo, with a tired, temporary Albanian overreaction, including violence, and so create UN administration and an undeveloped, low-growth the conditions for such partition. Partition, however, would economy, is a resolution based squarely on the plan of not only destroy the prospect of multi-ethnicity in Kosovo UN Special Envoy Martti Ahtisaari. This would supersede but also destabilise neighbouring states. UNSC Resolution 1244 (1999), define Kosovo’s internal settlement and minority-protection mechanisms, Implementation of Ahtisaari’s Comprehensive Proposal mandate a new international presence and allow for for the Kosovo Status Settlement will pose significant supervised independence. challenges. The key to a peaceful transition lies in its extensive decentralisation measures, which offer a way to Ahtisaari presented his plan in mid-March 2007 – in the secure buy-in to a new Kosovo state by its Serb minority, form of a short “Report” and a lengthy “Comprehensive especially the majority of Kosovo Serbs who live in Proposal” – to the Secretary-General, who forwarded it to enclaves south of the Ibar. The Ahtisaari Proposal is wisely the Security Council, with his full support, on 26 March. ambiguous with regard to the powers and duration of the This followed fourteen months of negotiations – a process EU mission that will oversee this settlement, ensuring that the Council had authorised with Resolution 1244 the international community will retain the final word in mandating “a political process designed to determine Kosovo through its formative years of statehood. Kosovo’s future status” – which failed to forge a compromise between Serbia and Kosovo Albanians. There is strong support from the major Western countries for the adoption of a resolution based on the full Ahtisaari The Ahtisaari plan is a compromise that offers Kosovo plan. But it is also important to exhaust all reasonable Albanians the prospect of independence, Kosovo Serbs opportunities to achieve the greatest unity possible within extensive rights, security and privileged relations with the Council, and most importantly, to avoid a Russian veto. Serbia, and Serbia the chance to put the past behind it once and for all and realise its European future. It is the Russia has opposed a quick timetable, strongly criticised best recipe for the creation of a multi-ethnic, democratic the Ahtisaari plan, raised concerns about the international and decentralised society and fits within the European precedent Kosovo may create and hinted that it might Union’s multi-ethnic project for the Western Balkans, veto a draft that does not take its position into account. which ultimately offers the prospect of accession. The Nonetheless a compromise solution may be possible EU is already the largest donor in Kosovo and plans to and should be attempted, possibly with the inclusion of assume the lion’s share of responsibility for the post-status additional elements of conditionality in the two-year period Kosovo civilian mission. Ultimately, Kosovo is, and will before review of the international supervisors’ mandate, remain until resolved, a European problem. and the reaffirmation of the need for more progress on minority rights standards. A resolution which does this The alternative is bleak. Forcing Kosovo Albanians back and endorses the Ahtisaari Proposal but does not into a constitutional relationship with Serbia would explicitly support Kosovo’s independence may achieve reignite violence. Belgrade has offered little beyond the necessary support. proposing that Kosovo remain an integral part of the Serbian state. It has done nothing over the past eight years to try to integrate Kosovo Albanians or to offer them Kosovo: No Good Alternatives to the Ahtisaari Plan Crisis Group Europe Report N°182, 14 May 2007 Page ii RECOMMENDATIONS To Members of the United Nations Security Council: 1. The United Nations Security Council should as soon as possible adopt a resolution under Chapter VII of the Charter which, optimally, would: (a) supersede UNSC Resolution 1244; (b) endorse both Ahtisaari’s Report on Kosovo’s Future Status, and his Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement; (c) mandate specifically the new international presences in Kosovo described in the Comprehensive Proposal, including the International Civilian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Irrigation Water Quality of Kosovo Plain
    Original scientific paper Оригиналан научни рад UDC: 628.1`034.3:631.67 DOI: 10.7251/AGREN1603243R Assessment of Irrigation Water Quality of Kosovo Plain Smajl Rizani1,2, Perparim Laze1,2, Alban Ibraliu1,2 1Agricultural University of Tirana, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Albania 2Department of Plant Science and Technology, Tirana, Albania Abstract The study aims to assess the quality of irrigation water of the Kosovo Plain. Twelve water samples were collected from sampling points in the peak of dry season in July 2015. Samples were taken from rivers, canals and pumping stations. The contents of the samples have been analyzed. The classification used to assess qualities and the suitability of irrigation water is based on FAO’s and USSL’s classification criteria of irrigation water. The study revealed that important constituents which influence the quality of irrigation water such as: electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, sodium adsorption ratio, soluble sodium percentage, residual sodium bicarbonate, permeability index and Kelly’s ratio, were found within the permissible limits of water for irrigation purposes. Therefore, the surface water of this area is deemed to be of an excellent quality and its use is highly recommended for the irrigation of crops. Key words: water, irrigation, quality, classification, assessment Agro-knowledge Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, 2016, 243-253 243 Introduction The quality of the irrigation water may affect both crop yields and soil physical conditions, even if all other conditions and cultural practices are optimal (FAO, 1985). Irrigation waters whether derived from springs, diverted from streams, or pumped from wells, contain appreciable quantities of chemical substances in solution that may reduce crop yield and deteriorate soil fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA and HUNGARY in the FIRST WORLD WAR: a VIEW from the 21ST CENTURY 21St -Century Studies in Humanities
    BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY 21st -Century Studies in Humanities Editor: Pál Fodor Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY Editors GÁBOR DEMETER CSABA KATONA PENKA PEYKOVSKA Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 Technical editor: Judit Lakatos Language editor: David Robert Evans Translated by: Jason Vincz, Bálint Radó, Péter Szőnyi, and Gábor Demeter Lectored by László Bíró (HAS RCH, senior research fellow) The volume was supported by theBulgarian–Hungarian History Commission and realized within the framework of the project entitled “Peripheries of Empires and Nation States in the 17th–20th Century Central and Southeast Europe. Power, Institutions, Society, Adaptation”. Supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences NKFI-EPR K 113004, East-Central European Nationalisms During the First World War NKFI FK 128 978 Knowledge, Lanscape, Nation and Empire ISBN: 978-963-416-198-1 (Institute of History – Research Center for the Humanities) ISBN: 978-954-2903-36-9 (Institute for Historical Studies – BAS) HU ISSN 2630-8827 Cover: “A Momentary View of Europe”. German caricature propaganda map, 1915. Published by the Research Centre for the Humanities Responsible editor: Pál Fodor Prepress preparation: Institute of History, RCH, Research Assistance Team Leader: Éva Kovács Cover design: Bence Marafkó Page layout: Bence Marafkó Printed in Hungary by Prime Rate Kft., Budapest CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................... 9 Zoltán Oszkár Szőts and Gábor Demeter THE CAUSES OF THE OUTBREAK OF WORLD WAR I AND THEIR REPRESENTATION IN SERBIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY .................................. 25 Krisztián Csaplár-Degovics ISTVÁN TISZA’S POLICY TOWARDS THE GERMAN ALLIANCE AND AGAINST GERMAN INFLUENCE IN THE YEARS OF THE GREAT WAR................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skanderbeg's Activity During the Period of 1443 – 1448
    History Research 2021; 9(1): 49-57 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/history doi: 10.11648/j.history.20210901.16 ISSN: 2376-6700 (Print); ISSN: 2376-6719 (Online) Skanderbeg's Activity During the Period of 1443 – 1448 Bedri Muhadri Department of the Medieval History, Institution of History “Ali Hadri”, Prishtina, Kosovo Email address: To cite this article: Bedri Muhadri. Skanderbeg's Activity During the Period of 1443 – 1448. History Research. Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 49-57. doi: 10.11648/j.history.20210901.16 Received : December 17, 2020; Accepted : January 29, 2021; Published : March 3, 2021 Abstract: The period of 1443-1448 marks the first step of the unification of many Albanian territories, under the leadership of Gjergj Kastriot-Skanderbeg, for the overall organization to fight the Ottoman invader and the usurper, the Republic of Venice. This union was realized with the Assembly of Lezha on March 2 of 1444 with the participation of all the Albanian princes, where the appropriate institutions were formed in the overall political and military organization of the country. Skanderbeg was appointed as commander and leader of the League of Lezha and Commander of the Arber Army. In such commitments the country was united politically and economically in the interest of realisation of a liberation war. In its beginnings the League of Lezha achieved great success by expelling Ottoman invaders in a number of cities and the headquarters of the League of Lezha became Kruja, the seat of the Kastriots. In an effort to preserve the territorial integrity of the country and to create preconditions for the country's economic development, the Lezha League headed by Skanderbeg had to go into war with the Republic of Venice, as a result of the Venetian occupation of the city of Deja, this war ended with the peace signed on 4 October of 1448.
    [Show full text]
  • (1389) and the Munich Agreement (1938) As Political Myths
    Department of Political and Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Helsinki The Battle Backwards A Comparative Study of the Battle of Kosovo Polje (1389) and the Munich Agreement (1938) as Political Myths Brendan Humphreys ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Helsinki, for public examination in hall XII, University main building, Fabianinkatu 33, on 13 December 2013, at noon. Helsinki 2013 Publications of the Department of Political and Economic Studies 12 (2013) Political History © Brendan Humphreys Cover: Riikka Hyypiä Distribution and Sales: Unigrafia Bookstore http://kirjakauppa.unigrafia.fi/ [email protected] PL 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 Helsingin yliopisto ISSN-L 2243-3635 ISSN 2243-3635 (Print) ISSN 2243-3643 (Online) ISBN 978-952-10-9084-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-9085-1 (PDF) Unigrafia, Helsinki 2013 We continue the battle We continue it backwards Vasko Popa, Worriors of the Field of the Blackbird A whole volume could well be written on the myths of modern man, on the mythologies camouflaged in the plays that he enjoys, in the books that he reads. The cinema, that “dream factory” takes over and employs countless mythical motifs – the fight between hero and monster, initiatory combats and ordeals, paradigmatic figures and images (the maiden, the hero, the paradisiacal landscape, hell and do on). Even reading includes a mythological function, only because it replaces the recitation of myths in archaic societies and the oral literature that still lives in the rural communities of Europe, but particularly because, through reading, the modern man succeeds in obtaining an ‘escape from time’ comparable to the ‘emergence from time’ effected by myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Field Trip Study Report
    Kosovo – from theory of human rights protection and monitoring to the complex realities on the ground By Güler Alkan, student representative What was our Kosovo field trip about and what did we learn from the experience on the ground? Was it a "journey" into a post-conflict country, a "tour" of international organizations, a great opportunity to talk to top-level diplomats and politicians, both national and international ones, and to hear from civil society and local NGOs? It was all of that and even more. The list of organizations, speakers and venues is too long to name them all – from the headquarters of UNMIK, EULEX or the OSCE mission in Pristina to visits to the Kosovo Assembly or official bodies like the Kosovo Judicial Centre as well as meetings with representatives from local NGOs, media and oppositional politicians. Every speaker was very eager to answer our questions – from the Minister of Trade and Industry, Mimoza Kusari-Lila, to Igballe Rogova, the founder of Kosovo Women's Network who shared with us her personal experiences and the daily struggle for women's and LGBT rights in Kosovo, to Albin Kurti, a political activist with whom we discussed lively about issues of self-determination, about how far one can go when protesting on the streets and about the limits of authorities repressing street protests. Our Kosovo trip went beyond purely academic or legal matters. We gained invaluable insights into the various dimensions of human rights issues in a post-conflict environment . We realized that establishing a functioning rule of law system is not only about adopting laws but also about the implementation of the provisions and the challenges faced in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • (A): REHABILITATION of RADONIQI IRRIGATION SCHEME
    Agriculture and Rural Development Project (ARDP) ESIA for Rehabilitation of Radoniqi-Dukagjini Irrigation Scheme ENVIROMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT Public Disclosure Authorized ASSESSMENT (ESIA) FOR THE SUB- COMPONENT 3 (a): REHABILITATION OF RADONIQI IRRIGATION SCHEME Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prishtina, 03.12.2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Agriculture and Rural Development Project (ARDP) ESIA for Rehabilitation of Radoniqi-Dukagjini Irrigation Scheme Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Project objectives ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Project scope ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATON AND PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................... 9 3. LEGAL AND POLICY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ESIA ............................................................................ 10 3.1 National Legislation of Relevance for the ESIA ................................................................................. 10 3.2 ESIA Procedure and Permitting ......................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Land Acquisition / Expropriation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium
    The UNCHS Kosovo Conflict Consequences for the Environment & Human Settlements First published in Switzerland in 1999 by the United Nations Environment Programme and the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Copyright © 1999,United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) ISBN 92-807-1801-1 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.UNEP and UNCHS (Habitat) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat). United Nations Environment Programme PO Box 30552 Nairobi Kenya Tel: +254 2 621234 Fax: +254 2 623927 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) PO Box 30030 Nairobi Kenya Tel: +254 2 621234 Fax: +254 2 624266/624267 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unchs.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP,UNCHS(Habitat) or contributory organisations.The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or UNCHS (Habitat) or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country,territory,city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on Biodiversity Assessment
    Final Report submitted to the United States Agency for International Development Biodiversity Kosovo Assessment Under the Biodiversity and Forestry Indefinite Quantity Contract Contract No. LAG-I-00-99-00013-00, Task Order No. 811 Submitted to: USAID/Kosovo Submitted by: ARD-BIOFOR IQC Consortium 159 Bank Street, Suite 300 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-3890 fax: (802) 658-4247 Email: [email protected] May 2003 Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................iii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Objective ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Environmental Requirements for Country Strategic Plans .............................................................. 1 1.4 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Background on Kosovo....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security Force in the Making: Capacity Building in Kosovo
    Security Force in the Making Capacity Building in Kosovo EMMA SKEPPstrÖM AND ANNA WEIBULL FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-funded agency under the Ministry of Defence. The core activities are research, method and technology development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 personnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOI Sweden’s largest research institute. FOI gives its customers access to leading-edge expertise in a large number of fields such as security policy studies, defence and security related analyses, the assessment of various types of threat, systems for control and management of crises, protection against and management of hazardous substances, IT security and the potential offered by new sensors. FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency Phone: 46 8 555 030 00 www.foi.se FOI-R--3276--SE User Report Defence Analysis Defence Analysis Fax: +46 8 555 031 00 ISSN 1650-1942 October 2011 SE-164 90 Stockholm Emma Skeppström and Anna Weibull Security Force in the Making Capacity Building in Kosovo FOI-R--3276--SE Titel Security Force in the Making: Capacity Building in Kosovo Title Security Force in the Making: Capacity Building in Kosovo Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--3276--SE Rapporttyp Användarrapport/User Report Report type Månad/Month Oktober/October Utgivningsår/Year 2011 Antal sidor/Pages 47 p ISSN Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet Projektnr/Project no A12014 Godkänd av/Approved by Maria Lignell Jakobsson FOI, Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency Avdelningen för Försvarsanalys 164 90 Stockholm SE-164 90 Stockholm Detta verk är skyddat enligt lagen (1960:729) om upphovsrätt till litterära och konstnärliga verk.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000
    Independent Evaluation of Expenditure of DEC Kosovo Appeal Funds Phases I and II, April 1999 – January 2000 Volume III Peter Wiles Mark Bradbury Manuela Mece Margie Buchanan-Smith Nicola Norman Steve Collins Ana Prodanovic John Cosgrave Jane Shackman Alistair Hallam Fiona Watson Overseas Development Institute In association with Valid International August 2000 ,QGHSHQGHQW(YDOXDWLRQRI([SHQGLWXUH RI'(&.RVRYR$SSHDO)XQGV 3KDVHV,DQG,,$SULO¤-DQXDU\ 7KHHYDOXDWLRQFRQVLVWVRIWKUHHYROXPHVRIZKLFKWKLVLVWKHWKLUG 9ROXPH,0DLQ)LQGLQJVRIWKH(YDOXDWLRQ 9ROXPH,,6HFWRUDO6HFWLRQV LQFOXGLQJDVHFWLRQRQ:DU$IIHFWHG 3RSXODWLRQVDQG%HQHILFLDULHV 9ROXPH,,,,QGLYLGXDO'(&$JHQF\6XPPDULHV Overseas Development Institute :HVWPLQVWHU %ULGJH 5RDG /RQGRQ 6( -' 7HO )D[ (PDLO KSJ#RGLRUJXN :HEVLWH ZZZRGLRUJXN *UHDW 3RUWODQG 6WUHHW /RQGRQ :1 $+ 7HO )D[ )XUWKHUGHWDLOVDERXWWKLVHYDOXDWLRQFDQEHIRXQGRQWKH'(&ZHEVLWHDW ZZZGHFRUJXN &RYHU:DLWLQJIRUDKRXVHWREHUHEXLOWLQ.RVRYR 3KRWRJUDSKWDNHQE\-RKQ&RVJUDYHGXULQJWKH(YDOXDWLRQ)LHOGZRUN0DUFK 'LVDVWHUV(PHUJHQF\&RPPLWWHH Preface Preface This volume of the DEC Kosovo Evaluation contains summaries of each agency’s DEC funded activities. Each agency section also looks at key issues relating to performance which the evaluation team felt merited comment. This volume should be read in conjunction with Volumes I and II of the Report. Volume I contains the main findings of the evaluation, together with overall conclusions and an executive summary. Volume II contains sections on sectoral topics, such as food and nutrition, shelter and
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Security Force: Quo Vadis?
    ELIAMEP Briefing Notes 14 /2013 May 2013 Kosovo Security Force: Quo Vadis? by Dr. Giorgos Triantafyllou, Research Associate , South-East Europe Programme, ELIAMEP, Greece On September 10, 2012, the International Civilian Representative for Kosovo (ICR), Pieter Feith, announced at a press conference that Kosovo’s supervised independence by the International Steering Group for Kosovo (ISG), pursuant to the Ahtisaari Plan, was over. The end of Kosovo’s supervision by the international community was undoubtedly an important milestone for the youngest country in the Balkans, and was hailed by Kosovar Prime Minister, Hashim Thaci, as a sign that Kosovo had gained a great deal of trust and respect in the international community. However, in the wake of its unsupervised policy making, Kosovo still has many serious problems to deal with, both internally, and in relation to its neighboring countries. Some of the most pressing issues stem from the ongoing debate on NATO’s future presence in Kosovo, and the quest for a new status for the Kosovo Security Forces (KSF). The KSF was formally created in January 2009, under the provisions of the Ahtisaari Plan and within the wider context of the ongoing security sector reform in Kosovo; it became operationally active in September 2009. Operating under the supervision of NATO’s KFOR, the KSF was established as a professional, uniformed, and minimally armed body, designed to represent the multi-ethnic composition of Kosovo’s society, and was placed under democratic, civilian control. The mandate of the KSF drew heavily from that of its predecessor, the Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC), a civil emergency response unit that was created in 1999 by the UN and NATO missions in Kosovo, in order to facilitate the effective reintegration of the former Kosovo Liberation Army combatants into the country’s post-conflict society.
    [Show full text]