WHY SUCCULENT FLOWERS SEJ by A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHY SUCCULENT FLOWERS SEJ by A Cape sugarbird WHY SUCCULENT FLOWERS SEJ by A. V. Milewski energy, water and nutrients which are The Field Guide to Trees of not retrieved by the plant, because the Southern Africa by Van Wyk & Van very purpose of fruit-pulp is to be Wyk (Struik 1997) shows the flowers removed from the plant once it is and fruits of trees and tall shrubs in ripe. The more resources the plant the south-western Cape. Of eighty spends on flowers, the less generous it species (excluding conifers) with is likely to be with fruit-pulp. Plants fleshy fruits eaten by birds, 91 % have may be generally faced with a choice small, dull flowers which easily of dispersing pollen or seeds, but not escape the notice of the human both, by avian flight. observer. Members of up to thirty-nine The division between bird-polli­ genera in twenty-five families conform nated and bird-sown plants is clear in in having fly-pollinated flowers and the south-western Cape, which has a bird-sown seeds in the south-western climate with winter rainfall and Cape. Eight percent (e.g. Glllysanthe­ summer drought similar to the maides, Grewia, Solanum) resemble lowers and fTllits vary greatly in Mediterranean Basin. Proteas charac­ many species of cultivated fruits size and how much food they teristic of this area produce large (e.g. apples, plums, raspberries) in Foffer polli nators. The smallest blooms pollinated by sunbirds and having colourful petals attracting flowers are dull greenish, and attract sugarbirds. Olives (Oleaceae) produce medium-size insects such as bees and pollinators no larger than small flies. succulent fruits conspicuous to beetles. The only species of tree or tall Large blooms usually produce enough mousebirds and bulbuls (lacking shrub in the south-western Cape that nectar to attract birds as pollinators. gizzards) and the rameron pigeon uses birds for pollination as well as Fruits vary in an inverse way to (which has a gizzard gentle on seeds, seed-dispersal is Halleria lucida. flowers. A generous succulent compared to seed-destroying doves However, the sunbirds that pollinate wrapping may be digested by birds, and pigeons). Although proteas lack the mainly red flowers of this honey­ rewarding them for passing the seeds petals, and spend energy on bulky suckle are not among the birds that intact for germination. This ripe fruit­ protection for their dry seeds, each usually eat its dark purple fruits. pulp may consist of up to 90% fruit­ bloom contains many flowers that do There are fifty-two species of trees juice. Alternatively, fruits may dry not produce seeds. For each seed and tall shrubs with dry fruits ignored and split with maturity, releasing dry produced, proteas devote more energy by most h'uit-eating birds in the south­ seeds. What is odd is that it is usually to nectar than to fruits. Seeds of western Cape. A few (e.g. Dadanaea, the large, generous flowers that certain species of Leucaspermum and Glutia) have the small, dull flowers produce the dry fruits, and the small Mimetes have a small food-body otherwise associated with succulent flowers, with negligible nectar, that attached like a handle, sufficient to h'uits, but most have colourful flowers produce the succulent fruits. reward ants for sowing the fallen (e.g. pink in Galadendrum), or small Birds are affected accordingly. seeds. HowiWer, this does not cost as whitish flowers massed together for Birds with syringe-shaped beaks suck much as the swee"t·or oily wrappings display (e.g. Buddleja, Brabejum, nectar while pollinating flowers, and on the seeds of e~. Rhus, Gymna­ Gunania). Blooms attractive to birds birds with relatively stout beaks sparia and Putterlickia. These are found in Proteaceae, Aloe, swallow fruits, extracting the juice in members of the Anacardiaceae and Burchellia, and Schatia in the south­ their stomachs before regurgitating or Celastraceae have small flowers, and western Cape, according to Van Wyk defaecating the whole seeds. What is are accordingly so~n by birds and Van Wyk. There are also more odd is that bird species specializing in although tlo1'eir frJits lose their than sixty local species of Erica not nectar usually do not take fruit-juice, succulence by drying out as they qualifying as tall shrubs, pollinated by and vice versa. This mutual exclu­ ripen, in the south-western Cape and sunbirds. Unlike many Ericaceae siveness between flowers and fruits, elsewhere under similar climates. found in the Mediterranean Basin'and expressed in both plants and birds, is Two types of plants often break the on other continents (e.g. blueberry), so common that it has virtually been rule that succulent flowers and these have dry fruits. overlooked by Science. succulent fruits tend to be mutually Many of the common species of Why do succulent flowers seldom exclusive. Various honeysuckles may bulbuls, starlings, and weavers of the produce succulent fruits, and why do produce copious nectar in tubular south-western Cape are capable of birds not accept nectar and fruit-juice flowers, followed by sweet, succulent sucking nectar and pollinating in combination? Perhaps the basic fruits. These fast-growing shrubs act flowers. Even the fruit-eating speckled reasons are that few plants can afford as pioneers, temporarily enjoying mousebird and rameron pigeon have to produce fruit-juice after producing access to resources sufficient for been observed taking nectar from nectaI' and large flowers, and nectar is plants larger than themselves. Aloe, without destroying the petals, not rewarding enough to attI'act birds Mistletoes (Loranthaceae) may elsewhere in South Africa. However, to carry items larger than pollen produce bird-pollinated flowers and most birds usually ignore nectar, and grains. red, succulent fruits. Because parasitic Plants pay birds to carry their plants suck juices from trees and propagules, by offering fuel, usually shrubs used as hosts, some mistletoes in the form of sugars. However, there are able to afford nectar as well as are extI'a costs. Petals are fragile, and paying small perching birds to sow the nutI'ients they contain may be sticky seeds on the stems of host wasted after serving their purpose of plants. Honeysuckles are represented display. Although not eaten by polli­ in the south-western Cape by HaIJeria nating birds, petals may be eaten by (Scrophulariaceae) and at least one other animals. Blooms do not sustain species of Lycium (Solanaceae). themselves by photosynthesis, Mistletoes in this area include because a green colour would hide Septulina glauco, which parasitizes them from biI'ds. Fruits contain Lycium. Seeds of Kiggeluriu ufricunu 80 Veld &' Flora June 2000 )M PRODUCE SUCCULENT FRUITS IN MY OPINION leave the patches of Proteaceae and certain fruits (e.g. Kiggelaria africana smallest of Australasian honeyeaters Erica to sunbirds and sugarbirds. Cape in the south-western Cape) contain (less than 10 g). South Africa alone whi te-eyes eat both nectar and fruit­ fats as well as sugars. The available contains certain vegetation types pulp, but they are too short-billed to payment of dilute energy can sustain dominated by bird-pollinated plants pollinate most flowers, and too small only relatively small body sizes, and (e.g. Pratea fynbos) and others to disperse most seeds. Instead, they plants do not encourage the eating of dominated by bird-sown plants (e.g. cheat on both types of plants, stealing petals needed for display. Fruit-eating thickets and forests of Olea). Since all nectar by pecking holes in floral tubes birds require extra protein rather than the vegetation of low trees or tall to avoid the anthers, and stealing energy, and are unlikely to be attracted shrubs here is dominated by either fruit-pulp by pecking holes into fruits to the meagre rewards offered by bird-pollinated or bird-sown plants, without swallowing seeds. Halleria plants for the transportation of pollen. it is remarkable that there are no lucida can be sown even by white­ Nectar-eating birds differ in shape equivalents for small hum.mingbirds, eyes because its fruit-pulp contains from fruit-eating birds, mainly because large honeyeaters, the Australian many small seeds. Even in the case of of their sizes. The beaks and tongues mistletoebird or the emu in the mistletoes in the south-western Cape, of sunbirds, sugarbirds, humming­ south-western Cape. the pollinators (sunbirds) differ from birds, and honeyeaters are not neces­ Unusually large ground orchids the seed-sowers (e.g. pied barbet). sarily longer than those of fruit-eating attract relatively large pollinators in Nectar-eating birds are everywhere birds but are effectively syringes fitted the south-western Cape. Most orchids smaller than fruit-eating birds, to small bodies. Bird-pollinated are particularly thrifty with their although size-ranges overlap. The sweet juices, perhaps because they largest pollinator (Cape sugarbird at photosynthesize relatively slowly, and 35 g) is less than one-tenth the body , The more resources the plant rely for energy partly on decomposing mass of the largest seed-sower in the spends on flowers, the less plant matter. Orchids tend to produce south-western Cape. Indeed, the little nectar, instead deceiving polli­ rameron pigeon is more massive than generous it is likely to be with nators by mimicry. These plants also any bird specializing in nectar, fruit-pulp. Plants may be produce aggregated pollen, which is including the relatively large generally faced with a choice deposited in a cohesive mass Australian honeyeaters. The Cape (pollinium) on visiting pollinators. sugarbird is nearly as large as the of dispersing pollen or seeds, Because their wind-borne seeds are Cape bulbul, but is much smaller than but not both, by avian flight., hardly larger than pollen grains, the speckled mousebird (50 g). The orchids are among the few plants in smallest nectar-eater (lesser double­ which pollen is effectively more collared sunbird at 8 g) is dwarfed by flowers assume tube shapes accord­ massive than seed.
Recommended publications
  • Apparent Absorption Efficiencies of Nectar Sugars in the Cape Sugarbird, with a Comparison of Methods
    106 Apparent Absorption Ef®ciencies of Nectar Sugars in the Cape Sugarbird, with a Comparison of Methods Susan Jackson1,* was artifactual, and we do not recommend use of this method. Susan W. Nicolson1 Apparent absorption ef®ciencies calculated with method 2 un- Ben-Erik van Wyk2 derestimated true absorption ef®ciency, because refractometry 1Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, measures nonsugar solutes, but this error is biologically sig- Rondebosch 7700, South Africa; 2Botany Department, Rand ni®cant only when ef®ciencies are low. Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa Accepted by G.K.S. 8/15/97 Introduction Nectarivorous birds consume dilute solutions of sucrose, fruc- ABSTRACT tose, and glucose and apparently assimilate these sugars very Nectarivore sugar preferences and nectar composition in the ef®ciently. Absorption ef®ciencies (AE) of 97%±99.5% for the Cape Floristic Kingdom (southern Africa) differ from trends three sugars have been measured in three families of specialized reported for analogous systems in America and Europe in that nectarivores: American hummingbirds (Hainsworth 1974; Kar- sugarbirds and sunbirds show no aversion to sucrose, which asov et al. 1986; MartõB nez del Rio et al. 1988; MartõB nez del Rio is the dominant nectar sugar in many of their food plants. To 1990b), Australian honeyeaters (Collins and Morellini 1979; elucidate the physiological bases (if any) of nectarivore sugar Collins et al. 1980), and African sunbirds (Lotz and Nicolson preferences, we determined apparent sugar absorption ef®- 1996). Of the above studies, two (MartõB nez del Rio 1990b; Lotz ciencies in a passerine endemic to this region, the Cape sugar- and Nicolson 1996) reported data for all three sugars, whereas bird Promerops cafer.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park Custom Tour Trip Report
    SOUTH AFRICA: MAGOEBASKLOOF AND KRUGER NATIONAL PARK CUSTOM TOUR TRIP REPORT 24 February – 2 March 2019 By Jason Boyce This Verreaux’s Eagle-Owl showed nicely one late afternoon, puffing up his throat and neck when calling www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT South Africa: Magoebaskloof and Kruger National Park February 2019 Overview It’s common knowledge that South Africa has very much to offer as a birding destination, and the memory of this trip echoes those sentiments. With an itinerary set in one of South Africa’s premier birding provinces, the Limpopo Province, we were getting ready for a birding extravaganza. The forests of Magoebaskloof would be our first stop, spending a day and a half in the area and targeting forest special after forest special as well as tricky range-restricted species such as Short-clawed Lark and Gurney’s Sugarbird. Afterwards we would descend the eastern escarpment and head into Kruger National Park, where we would make our way to the northern sections. These included Punda Maria, Pafuri, and the Makuleke Concession – a mouthwatering birding itinerary that was sure to deliver. A pair of Woodland Kingfishers in the fever tree forest along the Limpopo River Detailed Report Day 1, 24th February 2019 – Transfer to Magoebaskloof We set out from Johannesburg after breakfast on a clear Sunday morning. The drive to Polokwane took us just over three hours. A number of birds along the way started our trip list; these included Hadada Ibis, Yellow-billed Kite, Southern Black Flycatcher, Village Weaver, and a few brilliant European Bee-eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Resolving Lamiales Relationships
    Schäferhoff et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:352 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/352 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences Bastian Schäferhoff1*, Andreas Fleischmann2, Eberhard Fischer3, Dirk C Albach4, Thomas Borsch5, Günther Heubl2, Kai F Müller1 Abstract Background: In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past. Results: Our analysis of the rapidly evolving trnK/matK, trnL-F and rps16 chloroplast regions enabled us to infer more precise phylogenetic hypotheses for the Lamiales. Relationships among the nine first-branching families in the Lamiales tree are now resolved with very strong support. Subsequent to Plocospermataceae, a clade consisting of Carlemanniaceae plus Oleaceae branches, followed by Tetrachondraceae and a newly inferred clade composed of Gesneriaceae plus Calceolariaceae, which is also supported by morphological characters. Plantaginaceae (incl. Gratioleae) and Scrophulariaceae are well separated in the backbone grade; Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae appear in distant clades, while the recently described Linderniaceae are confirmed to be monophyletic and in an isolated position. Conclusions: Confidence about deep nodes of the Lamiales tree is an important step towards understanding the evolutionary diversification of a major clade of flowering plants. The degree of resolution obtained here now provides a first opportunity to discuss the evolution of morphological and biochemical traits in Lamiales.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanization, Climate and Ecological Stress Indicators in an Endemic Nectarivore, the Cape Sugarbird
    Urbanization, climate and ecological stress indicators in an endemic nectarivore, the Cape Sugarbird B. Mackay, A. T. K. Lee, P. Barnard, A. P. Møller & M. Brown Journal of Ornithology ISSN 2193-7192 J Ornithol DOI 10.1007/s10336-017-1460-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy J Ornithol DOI 10.1007/s10336-017-1460-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Urbanization, climate and ecological stress indicators in an endemic nectarivore, the Cape Sugarbird 1 1,2 1,2 3 4,5 B. Mackay • A. T. K. Lee • P. Barnard • A. P. Møller • M. Brown Received: 10 February 2016 / Revised: 6 October 2016 / Accepted: 21 April 2017 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2017 Abstract Stress, as a temporary defense mechanism urban settlements had higher levels of fluctuating asym- against specific stimuli, can place a bird in a state in which metry and fault bars in feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • NEST-SITE SELECTION in the CAPE SUGARBIRD We Dedicate
    NEST-SITE SELECTION IN THE CAPE SUGARBIRD A. E. BURGER, W. R. SlEGFRIED & P. G. H. FROST Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town We dedicate this paper to the memory of the late Dr G. J. Broekhuysen, our former mentor and friend, who did more than any other person in laying the foundations for an eco-ethologica1 approach in scientific studies ofthe avifauna of the south-western Cape region ofSouth Mrica. ABSTRACT Cape sugarbirds, P,ome,ops cafe" preferred certain protea bushes as nest-sites. These bushes were characterized by relatively large leaves and dense foliage. Nests were usually placed in the central parts of bushes Nest-sites were shielded from the cold night sky, and were associated with relatively favourable air temperatures and protection from wind in a season of unfavourable weather. Data on microclimate of nest-sites, together with those on heat loss from an incubating sugarbird, were interpreted in relation to nest-site selection as adaptive behaviour promoting breeding success through conservation of energy. Sugarbirds nesting relatively high off the ground and in dense vegetation were considered to be decreasing the risk of exposure to predators. ) 0 1 0 2 d INTRODUCTION e t a d ( r Food availability, and shelter from predators and adverse weather are ultimate factors in habitat e h s selection in bird species (Baker 1938; Hilden 1965). Nest-site selection is not a random procedure, i l b and nest building will commence only when the summation of the heterogeneous stimuli of the u P micro-habitat exceeds the threshold for releasing nesting behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Attempting to See One Member of Each of the World's Bird Families Has
    Attempting to see one member of each of the world’s bird families has become an increasingly popular pursuit among birders. Given that we share that aim, the two of us got together and designed what we believe is the most efficient strategy to pursue this goal. Editor’s note: Generally, the scientific names for families (e.g., Vireonidae) are capital- ized, while the English names for families (e.g., vireos) are not. In this article, however, the English names of families are capitalized for ease of recognition. The ampersand (&) is used only within the name of a family (e.g., Guans, Chachalacas, & Curassows). 8 Birder’s Guide to Listing & Taxonomy | October 2016 Sam Keith Woods Ecuador Quito, [email protected] Barnes Hualien, Taiwan [email protected] here are 234 extant bird families recognized by the eBird/ Clements checklist (2015, version 2015), which is the offi- T cial taxonomy for world lists submitted to ABA’s Listing Cen- tral. The other major taxonomic authority, the IOC World Bird List (version 5.1, 2015), lists 238 families (for differences, see Appendix 1 in the expanded online edition). While these totals may appear daunting, increasing numbers of birders are managing to see them all. In reality, save for the considerable time and money required, finding a single member of each family is mostly straightforward. In general, where family totals or family names are mentioned below, we use the eBird/Clements taxonomy unless otherwise stated. Family Feuds: How do world regions compare? In descending order, the number of bird families supported by con- tinental region are: Asia (125 Clements/124 IOC), Africa (122 Clem- ents/126 IOC), Australasia (110 Clements/112 IOC), North America (103 Clements/IOC), South America (93 Clements/94 IOC), Europe (73 Clements/74 IOC ), and Antarctica (7 Clements/IOC).
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Flower Symmetry Evolution Revealed Through Phylogenetic and Developmental Genetic Advances
    Trends in flower symmetry evolution revealed through phylogenetic and developmental genetic advances Lena C. Hileman rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA A striking aspect of flowering plant (angiosperm) diversity is variation in flower symmetry. From an ancestral form of radial symmetry (polysymmetry, actinomorphy), multiple evolutionary transitions have contributed to instan- Review ces of non-radial forms, including bilateral symmetry (monosymmetry, zygomorphy) and asymmetry. Advances in flowering plant molecular Cite this article: Hileman LC. 2014 Trends in phylogenetic research and studies of character evolution as well as detailed flower symmetry evolution revealed through flower developmental genetic studies in a few model species (e.g. Antirrhinum phylogenetic and developmental genetic majus, snapdragon) have provided a foundation for deep insights into flower symmetry evolution. From phylogenetic studies, we have a better under- advances. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369: 20130348. standing of where during flowering plant diversification transitions from http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0348 radial to bilateral flower symmetry (and back to radial symmetry) have occurred. From developmental studies, we know that a genetic programme One contribution of 14 to a Theme Issue largely dependent on the functional action of the CYCLOIDEA gene is necess- ‘Contemporary and future studies in plant ary for differentiation along the snapdragon dorsoventral flower axis. Bringing these two lines of inquiry together has provided surprising insights into both speciation, morphological/floral evolution the parallel recruitment of a CYC-dependent developmental programme and polyploidy: honouring the scientific during independent transitions to bilateral flower symmetry, and the modifi- contributions of Leslie D.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Halleria Lucida L. SCORE:8.0 RATING:High Risk
    TAXON: Halleria lucida L. SCORE: 8.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Halleria lucida L. Family: Stilbaceae Common Name(s): African honeysuckle Synonym(s): Halleria abyssinica Jaub. & Spach notsung tree fuchsia white olive Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 22 Jan 2018 WRA Score: 8.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Tropical Tree, Naturalized, Fast-Growing, Suckers, Bird-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 ? outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 n 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y=1, n=0 n Creation Date: 22 Jan 2018 (Halleria lucida L.) Page 1 of 16 TAXON: Halleria lucida L.
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving the Suburbs
    BIRD GARDENS nectar quandary Surviving the suburbs TEXT ANINA COETZEE & PHOEBE BARNARD e all delight in seeing a col- ourful sunbird flit into our garden to visit some flowers, Wespecially when one of the shyer spe- cies comes through. Have you thought about why some sunbirds are common in gardens while others are so rare? And whether they will disappear as urban de- velopment increases? These questions are important to us if we are to enjoy the presence of sunbirds and other nectarivorous birds in our gardens. But the questions are far more important to plants, because nectar-feeding birds pol- linate specific plants, enabling them to pro- duce seeds. This mutual relationship fosters plants dependent on the birds, while the birds in turn rely on the plants for food. As cities grow, they tend to crowd out natural areas, and residential areas are of- ten avoided by birds. If the development of towns and cities means that nectar- bearing plants and nectar-feeding birds become isolated in small fragments of ANJA MINNAAR natural habitat, both birds and plants will suffer. However, urban areas with gar- opportunistically. A different suite of above A male Southern Double-collared Sun- dens can be made less hostile and some plant species is adapted to pollination by bird attracted to an artificial nectar feeder. brave or adaptable birds will enter and these nectar-opportunists. use these new habitats. We at the FitzPatrick Institute of Afri- opposite A sunbird heads towards a red Urban environments that allow nectar- can Ornithology at UCT, the University hot poker to feed on the copious nectar it feeding birds to move between fragments of Stellenbosch and the South African produces.
    [Show full text]
  • Proximate Analyses and Amino Acid Composition of Selected Wild Indigenous Fruits of Southern Africa
    plants Article Proximate Analyses and Amino Acid Composition of Selected Wild Indigenous Fruits of Southern Africa Nozipho P. Sibiya 1, Eugenie Kayitesi 2,3 and Annah N. Moteetee 1,* 1 Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, APK Campus, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, DFC Campus, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 17011, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa; [email protected] 3 Department of Consumer and Food Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: A literature survey revealed that several wild indigenous Southern African fruits had previously not been evaluated for their proximate and amino acid composition, as well as the total energy value (caloric value). Fourteen species including Carissa macrocarpa, Carpobrotus edulis, Dovyalis caffra, Halleria lucida, Manilkara mochisia, Pappea capensis, Phoenix reclinata, and Syzygium guineense were analyzed in this study. The nutritional values for several species such as C. edulis, H. lucida, P. reclinata, and M. mochisia are being reported here for the first time. The following fruits had the highest proximate values: C. macrocarpa (ash at 20.42 mg/100 g), S. guineense (fat at 7.75 mg/100 g), P. reclinata (fiber at 29.89 mg/100 g), and H. lucida (protein at 6.98 mg/100 g and carbohydrates at 36.98 mg/100 g). Essential amino acids such as histidine, isoleucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and valine were reported in all studied indigenous fruits. The high protein content in H.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecological Consequences for Tree
    Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecological Consequences for Tree Populations and Bird Communities Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften - Fachbereich 1 - der Rheinisch - Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Bärbel Bleher aus Urach, jetzt Bad Urach Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. rer. nat. Ingolf Schuphan Universitätsprofessor Dr. rer. nat. Hermann Wagner Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 13. September 2000 If I know a song of Africa, of the giraffe and the African new moon lying on her back, of the plows in the fields and the sweaty faces of the coffee pickers, does Africa know a song of me? Will the air over the plain quiver with a color that I have had on, or the children invent a game in which my name is, or the full moon throw a shadow over the gravel of the drive that was like me, or will the eagles of the Ngong Hills look out for me? T. Blixen dedicated to my parents CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 SEED DISPERSAL BY ANIMALS AND CONSEQUENCES FOR PLANTS 1 1.2 FRUIT AVAILABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES FOR FRUGIVOROUS ANIMALS 2 1.3 RELEVANCE FOR CONSERVATION 3 1.4 AIMS OF THESIS 4 2. SEED DISPERSAL BY BIRDS IN A SOUTH AFRICAN AND A MALAGASY COMMIPHORA SPECIES 7 2.1 INTRODUCTION 7 2.2 THE TREES 8 2.3 STUDY SITES 9 2.4 METHODS 10 2.4.1 FRUGIVORE DIVERSITY 10 2.4.2 TREE OBSERVATIONS 10 2.4.3 FRUIT TRAPS 10 2.5 RESULTS 11 2.6 DISCUSSION 16 2.7 SUMMARY 19 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Scanned Documents
    5^' PROMEROPS AS A THRUSH, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF NECTARIVORY IN BIRDS STORRS L, OLSON' & PETER L. AMES^ 'National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. ^Harza Engineering Company, 150 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, U.S.A. Received September 1984 SUMMARY OLSON, S. L. & AMES, P. L. 1984. Promerops as a thrush and its implications for the evolution of nectar- ivory in birds. Ostrich 56:213-218 The familial relationships of the South African sugarbirds {Promerops) have never been firmly established, although an alliance with the Meliphagidae or the Sturnidae has been suggested on rather equivocal grounds. The syrinx in Promerops is now shown to have the derived "turdine thumb" configuration that is characteristic of the true Old Worid flycatchers and the thrushes (Muscicapini auct. and Turdinae), to which group Promerops should now be moved. Promerops shows that the highly specialized morphology and behaviour associated with nectarivory can evolve in a "saltational" manner, leaving no intermediate forms and few clues to the identity of the ancestral taxon. Nectarivorous feeding adaptations are a very poor indication of relationships. The closest relatives of other nectarivorous groups of birds are probably best sought among taxa that lack morphological specializations for nectar feeding. INTRODUCTION adapted], and nothing else in Africa is really like them." To those familiar with the South African Cape Sibley & Ahlquist (1974) have outlined the taxo- and Gurney's
    [Show full text]