J. exp. Biol. (1980), 88, 407-411 407 With 2 figures Printed in Great Britain

THE CALLING SONG OF THE BLADDER , SAUNDERSII: A COMPUTER ANALYSIS

BY DAVID YOUNG Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052

Males of many species attract females over long distances by means of loud sounds. These are termed calling songs and often consist of relatively pure tones, especially among the families Gryllidae, Gryllotalpidae, some Tettigoniidae (Ortho- ptera) and (Homoptera) (reviews by Bennet-Clark, 1971; Michelsen & Nocke, 1974; Eisner, 1978). In the present report a detailed description is given of the calling song of the bladder cicada, , an insect which has been the subject of several recent studies (Young & Hill, 1977; Fletcher & Hill, 1978; Simmons & Young, 1978; Josephson & Young, 1979). Earlier descriptions of the calling song of this species were based on the limited information available from oscillograms and sonagrams (Young, 1972 a, b). Calling songs were recorded with a Sennheiser MKH 816 directional microphone and a Nagra IVS tape recorder at a tape speed of 15 in. s-1. Six undisturbed males were recorded singing in shrubs. In addition, recordings were made from four males singing while tethered in the field; these four males were tethered as part of a study by MacNally & Young (1980) on the energetics of sound production in this species. The recorded songs were digitized for computer analysis via an analogue to digital converter at a sampling frequency of 16 kHz. The computer displayed waveform (Fig. 1 a, c) shows the distinct sound pulses which characterize the song, with each pulse having a tripartite structure (labelled A, B, C in Fig. 1 a). The published evidence indicates that the sound is amplified by the resonant abdomen of the cicada, which is excited by a pair of tymbals (Young, 1972 a; Fletcher & Hill, 1978; Simmons & Young, 1978). The two tymbals each produce two pulses per cycle but operate 25 % out of phase, thereby generating the tripartite pulses. Thus, in Fig. 1 a, pulse part A is produced by one tymbal, part C by the other and part B by the two overlapping (Simmons & Young, 1978). There are small but con- sistent differences between individuals in the relative timing and amplitude of parts A, B, C of each tripartite pulse. After the final excitation in each cycle, at the onset of part C, the sound waveform shows an exponential decline in amplitude (see especially Fig. ic). The digitized data was subjected to a linear predictive analysis (LPA), designed to detect resonances in speech (Markel & Gray, 1976). The LPA imposes a model on the data, which is analysed in terms of any specified number of resonances. Where this number is small, a very small window size may be employed without loss of ac- curacy. In the present case, this enables one to distinguish changes within each of the tripartite pulses (Fig. 1). The results were similar in all ten individuals. The analysis shows that there is only a single resonance in the song and that its peak frequency (a)

(.b) 3 5 11 13 |l5 17 |l9 |21 23 |25 1 h 4' 6 10 14 16 Il8 20 22 24 26

(c)

Fig. i. (a) Computer displayed waveform of the calling song of a tethered male. A, B, C label the three parts which are distinguishable within each pulse of the song. (6) Diagram representing the windows used in the linear predictive analysis of the waveforms in (a) and (c). The values obtained for each window in both (a) and (c) are shown against the corresponding window number in Table i. Each window is 4 ms in duration. (c) Computer displayed waveform of the calling song of a free (non-tethered) male, showing the pulse structure at a break in the song.

Table 1. Linear predictive analysis of the waveforms shown in Fig. 1 Fig. 1 a sample Fig. 1 c sample

Window Peak Bandwidth Peak Bandwidth number frequency 3 dB down Q frequency 3 dB down Q 1 1160-2 2668 43 9575 1697 5-6 2 1286-1 4894 26 948-2 1572 60 3 1016-5 273-1 37 932-5 II2-I 8-3 4 1002-0 1999 5° 9344 106-1 8-8 5 9934 1982 50 8873 1306 6-8 6 956-6 221-3 4'3 8804 1097 80 7 10034 1629 6-2 8833 121-9 7-2 8 899-0 1434 6-3 1123-3 264-3 43 9 9271 113-0 8-2 II39-O 387-3 2-9 10 936-9 995 94 1028-1 261-6 39 11 937O 1038 90 ion-6 201-5 50 12 93O-5 107-6 8-6 9420 179-4 5-2 13 1569-7 345-4 45 9593 1674 5-7 '4 11817 2787 42 874-4 106-4 82 15 10873 271-4 4-0 9236 1256 7'4 16 935-5 201-8 46 9282 1266 7-3 17 9374 1998 4-7 884-1 117-3 7-5 18 958-2 1635 5'9 8934 1331 67 19 977-1 214-6 46 8760 97-6 90 20 9834 164-0 60 8738 96-2 91 21 9130 1363 67 874-3 92-9 94 22 934-5 1039 90 9129 144-2 6-3 23 9932 1180 84 9544 1482 64 - 24 987-5 150-6 6-6 949 4 120-9 79 25 939-6 1505 6-2 9889 115-0 8-6 26 1262-3 3308 3-8 936-8 1661 5-6 Calling song of C. saundersii 409

-10

•o -20.

-30

-40

-50

02 0-4 0-6 0-8 10 1-2 1-4 1-6 1-8 20 2-2 2-4 2-6 2-8 30 Frequency (kHz) Fig. 2. Log power spectrum of the calling song of a free (non-tethered) male. The actual 32 ms sample which was analysed is shown in the inset.

changes during each pulse. A measure of the sharpness of tuning (Q) is obtained by dividing the peak frequency by the bandwidth 3 dB down (Table 1). A window by window comparison of the waveform in Fig. 1 with the corresponding LPA figures in Table 1 shows that the early portion of each pulse (parts A, B, onset of C), during which the abdomen is being excited by the tymbals, is mostly characterized by a higher peak frequency, less sharply tuned. The trailing portion of each pulse (part C) showing the exponential decay, is characterized by a lower peak frequency, more sharply tuned. This is seen particularly clearly where a pulse trails away at a break in the song (Fig. 1 c). This is the expected pattern if the sound is generated by the excitation and decay of a resonant system. A Fourier analysis of the digitized data was also undertaken to obtain a power spectrum of the calling song (Fig. 2). The number of frequencies which can be dis- tinguished by this analysis is proportional to the number of samples and hence to the window size. In the present case, a window size of 32 ms was the smallest that would allow sufficient frequency resolution and this just includes a single pulse (see inset, Fig. 2). The results were consistent both within and between individuals. In each case a sharp peak is seen within the range 820 to 909 Hz (x = 865; s.D. = 23-45; n = I0)- At frequencies below this peak, the roll-off is steep but at higher frequencies two or three secondary peaks are found, mostly in the range 920 to 1400 Hz. This arrangement of peaks agrees well with the LPA figures (Fig. 1; Table 1). The main peak (around 865 Hz) is evidently generated by the trailing portion (part C) of the tripartite pulse, while the secondary peaks are generated by the early portion (parts A, B) of the pulse. A first harmonic, on average 17-5 dB below the main peak, stands out clearly at around 1700 Hz (Fig. 2) and the lesser peaks at still higher 410 D. YOUNG frequencies may be interpreted as harmonics of the 950-1400 Hz peaks. The pealq observed below roo Hz is probably due to the modulation envelope, i.e. the pulse repetition frequency which will be detectable, in a window of 32 ms duration. The overall shape of the log power spectrum for C. saundersii is similar to those available from other species with relatively pure tone calling songs (Bennet-Clark, 1971; Nocke, 1972; Counter, 1976, 1977). However the Gryllidae and Gryllotalpidae lack the secondary peaks between the main peak and the first harmonic and so may be considered to have purer songs. The relative intensity of the first and second har- monics in C. saundersii is similar to that in the Gryllidae (Bennett-Clark, 1971; Counter, 1976). Comparison within each individual shows that the LPA consistently over-estimates the peak frequency, relative to the Fourier analysis, by about 60 Hz. This is probably due to the smoothing effect which the LPA has on the data. With a sharply skewed distribution such as the power spectrum shows, smoothing would tend to shift the peak in the direction of normality, i.e. toward higher frequencies. The sharpness of tuning (Q) of the main peak, estimated from the log power spectrum, is about 15. The average value of Q from part C of each pulse in the LPA is consistently about half this value (Table 1). This difference also is probably due to the smoothing effect of the LPA, which generates wider bandwidths than the original data. The Q value of 15 for the main peak in C. saundersii is similar to that of calling songs in Gryllidae but somewhat lower than that observed in Gryllotalpidae and some Tettigoniidae (Bennet-Clark, 1971; Counter, 1976, 1977). Nocke (1971) gives higher values for Gryllidae but these are based upon resonances obtained experimentally in the sound- radiating structures of the wing and not on frequency spectra of the calling songs. No significant difference between free and tethered could be found in any of the parameters studied. Thus, from the Fourier analyses, the mean peak frequency and standard deviation for free and tethered cicadas are respectively 873 + 1856 Hz (n = 6) and 853 + 27-4 Hz (n = 4). Similarly, the first harmonic fell below the main peak by 17-8 dB (s.D. = 1-27) in free cicadas and by 17-05 (s.n. = i-6) in tethered cicadas. In conclusion, the computer analysis shows that the calling song of C. saundersii approximates to a modulated pure tone, that the pattern of sound is entirely consistent with its being generated by the excitation and decay of a resonant system, and that tethering the cicada makes no significant difference to the physical characteristics of the song. I am most grateful to Kim Silverman for his advice and assistance and also to Ian Richards for his help with the programming. The computer facilities were kindly made available by the Psychology Department of Melbourne University. The directional microphone was purchased through a grant from the Ian Potter Foundation.

REFERENCES BENNET-CLARK, H. C. (1971). Acoustics of insect song. Nature, Land. 234, 255-239. COUNTER, S. A. JR. (1976). Fourier and electrophysiological analyses of acoustic communication in Acheta domesticus. J. Insect Physiol. 22, 589-593. COUNTER, S. A. JR. (1977). Bioacoustics and neurobiology of communication in the tettigoniid, Neo- conocephalus robustus. J. Insect Physiol. 23, 993-1008. Calling song of C. saundersii 411 SNER, N. (1978). Neuroethology of acoustic communication. Adv. Insect Physiol. 13, 229-355. CHER, N. & HILL, K. G. (1978). Acoustics of sound production and of hearing in the bladder cicada, Cystosoma saundersii (Westwood). J. exp. Biol. 72, 43-55. JOSEPHSON, R. K. & YOUNG, D. (1979). Body temperature and singing in the bladder cicada, Cystosoma saundersii. J. exp. Biol. 80, 69-81. MACNALLY, R. & YOUNG, D. (1980). Song energetics of the bladder cicada, Cystosoma saundersii. J. exp. Biol. (in the Press). MARKEL, J. D. & GRAY, A. H. JR. (1976). Linear Prediction of Speech. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. MICHELSEN, A. & NOCKE, H. (1974). Biophysical aspects of sound communication in . Adv. Insect Physiol. 10, 247-296. NOCKE, H. (1971). Biophysik der Schallerzeugung durch die Vorderfliigel der Grillen. Z. vergl, Physiol. 74. 272-314- NOCKE, H. (1972). Physiological aspects of sound communication in crickets (Gryllus campestris L.). J. comp. Physiol. 80, 141-162. SIMMONS, P. J. & YOUNG, D. (1978). The tymbal mechanism and song patterns of the bladder cicada, Cystosoma saundersii. J. exp. Biol. 76, 27—45. YOUNG, D. (1972 a). Neuromuscular mechanism of sound production in Australian cicadas. J. comp. Physiol. 79, 343-362. YOUNG, D. (19726). Analysis of songs of some Australian cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae). J. Aust. ent. Soc. 11, 237-243. YOUNG, D. & HILL, K. G. (1977). Structure and function of the auditory system of the cicada. Cysto- soma saundersii. J. comp. Physiol. 117, 23-45.