Tour Guide - Louvre & Bible MAJ 08/17 (Eng) Sully / Denon Mercury

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tour Guide - Louvre & Bible MAJ 08/17 (Eng) Sully / Denon Mercury Greek and Roman Antiquities • Hermes Fastening Sandal www.tour.louvrebible.org Tour Guide - Louvre & Bible MAJ 08/17 (Eng) Sully / Denon Mercury. Messenger of Caryatid Room the gods. Acts 14:12 Near Eastern Antiquities 3 • Worshipper of Larsa Richelieu Cult moon. Job 31:27 • Athlete’s Head • Aphrodite 1 • Map • Libation to god Shamash Bible & Sport : No anathema . Vénus. Ishtar. Mesopotamia. Acts 7:2 Sun-god. Halo 1 Cor 9:24; Héb 12:1; 2 Tim 2:5 Vénus de Milo Babylon. Genesis 10:10 • Code of Hammurabi • Victory Stele King Eannatum Ancestor of Mosaic Law ? • God Pan • Eros Oldest historical doc. Many Différences A devil with horns. Lupercales. 4 terms: Eros. Philia. Net. Ps 66:11; Mi 7 • List of Kings Larsa. Chronology Saint Valentine’s Day. 14 feb Storge. Agape. John 13:35 • Writing’s birth • Vase Goddess Ishtar Babel. Gen 11:9. Nimrod. Mother-goddess worship • Dionysus and the Seasons Rooms 22 to 30 Heritage from Babylon • Demon Humbaba Bacchus. Orgy. Romans 13:13 • Cylinder Seal • Divinatory Livers Festival of the Carnaval. • So-Called Domitius Relief Melchisedek. Priest-King Ez 21:21. Spiritism • Drunken Silenius. Komast Census scene. Luke 2:1 • Votive Bas Relief Dudu • Model Ruins Palace of Mari • Cult of Dionysus Large shield. Eph 6:16 Myths of creation 15,000 clay tablets • Augustus 1 b • Ebib II • Organiser of the Sacrifice • Artemis With a Doe First Caesar quoted Bible. Biblical Archaeology • Kudurru Meli-Shipak II Diane. Goddess of the moon. Luc 2:1-5. JC birth. • Ceramic Fragments Boundaries. Prov 23:10 Artemis of Ephesus. Acts 19:28 • Emperor Tiberius Bitumen. Genesis 11:3 Exode 20:4. Microcosm Secd C. 14 CE. Mark 12:15 2 • Murex. Purple vt15 • Myths of Creation • The Torment of Marsyas • Claudius • Victory Stele of Naram-Sin • "The Righteous Sufferer" Torture stake. Crux simplex. Third Caesar. Acts 11:28 Horn . Psalm 75:5 • Magic Formula Mat 27:40. Traditional cross Suetonius Nimrod. Akkad • Zodiac Calendar • Nero • The Art of Seals. Nergal 6 • Arslan Tash Ivories • Alexander the Great Acts 25:10 • The Architect with a plan Hazaël. Amos • Titus. Luke 21:20-24 • Libation Vase • Lion passant • Seleucos 1 er Nicator • Sarcophagus of the Spouses • Bas relief Ninsun. Flood Daniel. Akîtu Syrie. Daniel 11:4 • Mithraic Relief • Cylinder of Gudéa. New Year • The So-called ‘Esagila Tablet’ Persian god light. Luk 2:32 • Figurines or Small Plaques Ziggurat. Tower of Babel Rooms 8 to 15 (on the left) Festival of Christmas Teraphim. Genesis 31:34 • Head of a Horned Dragon • Emperor Constant Ier • Gushing Vase Marduk. Major god Babylon • Cult of Cybèle au Pirée Christendom / Christianity • Statue of Ur-Ningirsu Polytheism. Bible prophecy Rhéa. Mother’s Day • School Tablet Psalm 110:1. Josh 10:24 • New Year Ritual in Babylon • Ptolemy I Soter 1 Peter 2:21 • Lament destruction Ur. Sin Egypt / Palestine.l Mat 2:14 4 • Weight with Crescent Moon 1 Khorsabad courtyard [18a • Votive Stele. Tanit Egyptian Antiquities 19 • The bull Apis • Transport timber cedar • Urn Calcified Remains Sully 18 • The gods of Egypt. Ex 12:12 • Winged Bulls. Hero and lion Child Sacrifice Crypt of sphinx & Rooms 3 - 18 Isis. Cult Mother and Child • Sargon II • Cippus. Melquart Esaiah 20:1. Archaeology • Teima Stele C. • Great sphinx First Floor Assyrian art Aramaic text Shishak. Pharaoh. 1 Kings 14 6 • Demon Pazuzu [ 20 • Triad of Beelshamên 3 • Hâpy & Tilapia nilotica 22 • False door Méry • Annals of Sennachérib Palmyre. Trinity Nile. New Year's Day. Nb 11:5 • The “Seated Scribe” • Prism F Assurbanipal • Funerary Relief 4 • Mastaba 25 • King Akhenaten • Rebuilding Babylone Mourning. Am 5:16 Worship ancestors. Eccl 9:5 Monotheism ? • Reliefs Deportation of Elamites Jewish tombs • Model of granary • Royal child. Grapes Gen 40 Pul. 2 Kings 15:29 Tafos / mnemeion Genesis 41:56 27 • Hormin 7 • Geometric Decorated Bowl [ 21 • Colossal Vase 5 • Vine; Bread Necklace of gold. Gen 41:42 Cro ss. Svastiska Molten seal 6 • Scribe, Letter hieratic 8 • ‘Hideaway’ vase. Jer 32:14 7 • Goddess Maât & the ankh Campana gallery • Statue of Goddess Narundi Rooms of Levant • Furniture leg. Apries 40 Oenochoe. Svastika • Statue of Manishtousou 9 • Jewellery 39 Pig sacrifice. Antiochus IV 10 • The Golden Worshipper D • Mesha Stele • Razors Cult, Candle and Prayer 800 BCE. Moab Joseph. Genesis 41:14 29 • Triad of Osorkon I • Table decorated with serpents YHWH transcription 10 • Sistrum. 2 Samuel 6:5 Trinity. Deut 5:7 • Sit Shamshi. High places • Seal inscribed Hebrew 11 • Sphinx • Amulet Darius I 11 • Electrum Goblet • Model Shrine 12 • Colossus of King Aménophis • King Taharqa. Isaiah 37:9 12 • Palace of Darius I • Weights written down • Osiris et his son Horus 30 • Queen Cleopatra VII Capital of a Column . Esther • Letter from Biridiya • Zodiac of Dendéra 36 • Cybele. Mother’s Day Cylinder Seals . Law Medes • Statue in Human Form Astrology. Job 26:7 36 • Artemis of Ephesus ← Sphinx. Frieze of Archers Cr • Hymn to Osiris Acts 19:28 [14 • Foundation Charter C • Funerary Steles 13 • Funerary Papyrus Sérimen • Head of Zeus. Acts 28:11 • Cup Xerxes • Stele of Si Gabbor 14 • Sarcophagi 33 Skeleton cups • Contrat in babylonian. 539 BC. 15 • Mummy Conception life. 1 Cor 15:32 [16 • Mosaic Woman Playing the Harp B • Map: Genesis 50:2. • Cameo of Augustus • Decorated Vase. Dance Byblos. Uugarit • Four canopic Jars • Palestinian lamps. [17 • Sarcophagus Eshmunazor • Stele of Storm God Baal Medical wisdom. Acts 7:22 Mat 5:14 • Ashtart’s Throne Baal Hadad. Canaan Mosaic Law. Psalm 19 32 • Armour and Jewellery 1 King 11:5 Canaanite worship Elie. 1 Kings 17:1 • Censer arm. Genesis 37:25 Ephésiens 6 Ras Shamra Ugarit • Golden Calf 17 • The Book of the Dead • Janus head • Boat Models • Trivet & Pomegranates Plato. Immortality. • Metal mirror. 1 Cor 13:12 Tyr e / Byblos / Bible 2 19 • Ram's mummy 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Antikenrezeption Im Hochbarock
    Antikenrezeption im Hochbarock Herausgegeben van Herbert Beck und Sabine Schulze GEBR. MANN VERLAG· BERLIN lRVTNG LAVIN Bernini and Antiquity - The Baroque Paradox A Poetical View* My chief purpose in this paper is to bring together and consider under one heading two papers by earlier scholars on apparently quite different subjects that are fundamcntnl to some of our current views on the relationship of Baroque art to antiquity. In a brief note entitled ··Rhetoric and Baroque Art". published in 1955 . Giulio Carlo Argan for the first time offered what has since become perhaps the prevalent interpretation of Ba roque art. base d on the classical tradition of rhetoric'. The primary source book on the subject. Arist0tle's treatise on rhetoric. became available in Italian translation in 1570. The wide influence of Argan ·s essay was very salubrious. suggesting as it did that Baroque style. often regarded as a decadent superabundance of ornament and conceit. could better be under­ stood positively as a deliberate and sophisticated technique of persuasion. T he second paper. published by RudolfWiukower in 1963, compared the use ofanciem models by Poussin. the arch classicist of France. and Bernini, the outstanding representative of Italian Baroque 2 exuberance . With great perspicuity Wittkower showed from preparatory studies how classical sources functioned in diametrically opposite ways in the development of their works. Poussin would typicall y start with a dynamic. ··Baroque" design. into which ancient models would then intervene to produce a restrained. classicizing final version: Bernini. on the other hand. would often start with a classical prototype. which he would then transform into a free and volatile ·'Baroque'· solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Art 258: Ancient and Medieval Art Spring 2016 Sched#20203
    Art 258: Ancient and Medieval Art Spring 2016 Sched#20203 Dr. Woods: Office: Art 559; e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Monday and Friday 8:00-8:50 am Course Time and Location: MWF 10:00 – 10:50 HH221 Course Overview Art 258 is an introduction to western art from the earliest cave paintings through the age of Gothic Cathedrals. Sculpture, painting, architecture and crafts will be analyzed from an interdisciplinary perspective, for what they reveal about the religion, mythology, history, politics and social context of the periods in which they were created. Student Learning Outcomes Students will learn to recognize and identify all monuments on the syllabus, and to contextualize and interpret art as the product of specific historical, political, social and economic circumstances. Students will understand the general characteristics of each historical or stylistic period, and the differences and similarities between cultures and periods. The paper assignment will develop students’ skills in visual analysis, critical thinking and written communication. This is an Explorations course in the Humanities and Fine Arts. Completing this course will help you to do the following in greater depth: 1) analyze written, visual, or performed texts in the humanities and fine arts with sensitivity to their diverse cultural contexts and historical moments; 2) describe various aesthetic and other value systems and the ways they are communicated across time and cultures; 3) identify issues in the humanities that have personal and global relevance; 4) demonstrate the ability to approach complex problems and ask complex questions drawing upon knowledge of the humanities. Course Materials Text: F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms
    McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee with contributions from Tom D. Dillehay, Li Min, Patricia A. McAnany, Ellen Morris, Timothy R. Pauketat, Cameron A. Petrie, Peter Robertshaw, Andrea Seri, Miriam T. Stark, Steven A. Wernke & Norman Yoffee Published by: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge, UK CB2 3ER (0)(1223) 339327 [email protected] www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2019 © 2019 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISBN: 978-1-902937-88-5 Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge. Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge. Cover image: Ta Prohm temple, Angkor. Photo: Dr Charlotte Minh Ha Pham. Used by permission. Edited for the Institute by James Barrett (Series Editor). Contents Contributors vii Figures viii Tables ix Acknowledgements x Chapter 1 Introducing the Conference: There Are No Innocent Terms 1 Norman Yoffee Mapping the chapters 3 The challenges of fragility 6 Chapter 2 Fragility of Vulnerable Social Institutions in Andean States 9 Tom D. Dillehay & Steven A. Wernke Vulnerability and the fragile state
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Facts- Hierarchical Scale
    Terms and facts- Hierarchical scale From the Prehistoric and Neolithic- Post and Lintel, Megalith, tumulus, henge From Mesopotamia- The Code of Hammurabi, Shamash, Lamassu, Ziggurat, load bearing architecture, The Sumerians, the Akkadians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, Stele or Stela From Minoa- Labrys, The myth of King Minos and the Minotaur From Mycenae- Corbelled vaults and domes, repousse, Tholos, Megaron, krater From Ancient Egypt- Ben-ben, mastaba, Imhotep, Ma’at, Canon (of artistic laws), cartouche, Canopic jars, Shabti or ushabti, the imagery of nine in connection to the pharaoh, the Amarna Period From Ancient Greece- Polykleitos, Humanism, contrapposto, Exekias, kouros and Kore, archaic smile, Praxiteles, some Greek mythology-especially the main gods and goddesses, meander (key design) Know the seven steps to lost wax casting Know the basic architecture of a Greek Temple-peristyle, the three column orders, (Doric, Ionic, Corinthian), stylobate, cella, shaft, caryatids, pediment, capital The two styles of Greek vase painting-black figure and red figure-the basic differences in look You should look up exam one of these myths and know the basic story or the main story about the character listed: Prometheus and Fire Apollo and Daphne Pygmalion and Galatea Niobe Persephone and Hades Pandora Tantalus-Son of Zeus The Danaides Alcyone and Ceyx Idas and Marpessa The Fall of Icarus Theseus and the Minotaur Perseus and the Medusa Jason and Medea Hercules and the Stymphalian Birds Chapter 2.9 Sculpture PART 2 MEDIA AND PROCESSES Seven steps in the lost-wax casting process Build and armature, sculpt the piece (clay), cover with ½ “ layer of wax, cover the entire piece with debris mixture, heat the entire work to melt out the wax through pre-drilled hole, pour the molten metal into the work through pre-drilled holes, break away the debris layer, clean and polishGateways to Art: Understanding the Visual Arts, Debra J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Code of Hammurabi
    The Code of Hammurabi The Original Version of this Text was Rendered into HTML by Jon Roland of the Constitution Society Converted to PDF by Danny Stone as a Community Service to the Constitution Society The Code of Hammurabi 1 The Code of Hammurabi hen Anu the Sublime, King of the Anunaki, and Bel, the lord of Heaven and earth, who Wdecreed the fate of the land, assigned to Marduk, the over-ruling son of Ea, God of righteousness, dominion over earthly man, and made him great among the Igigi, they called Babylon by his illustrious name, made it great on earth, and founded an everlasting kingdom in it, whose foundations are laid so solidly as those of heaven and earth; then Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak; so that I should rule over the black-headed people like Shamash, and enlighten the land, to further the well- being of mankind. Hammurabi, the prince, called of Bel am I, making riches and increase, enriching Nippur and Dur-ilu beyond compare, sublime patron of E-kur; who reestablished Eridu and purified the worship of E- apsu; who conquered the four quarters of the world, made great the name of Babylon, rejoiced the heart of Marduk, his lord who daily pays his devotions in Saggil; the royal scion whom Sin made; who enriched Ur; the humble, the reverent, who brings wealth to Gish-shir-gal; the white king, heard of Shamash, the mighty, who again laid the
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in Ancient Mesopotamia Zchapter ONE JUSTICE in ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA
    Justice in Ancient Mesopotamia zCHAPTER ONE JUSTICE IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA Introduction Any study of justice in the Bible must begin with ancient Mesopotamia be- cause the concept and the vocabulary of biblical justice are rooted in that culture. To uncover these roots, this chapter will explore justice in ancient Mesopotamia from the Sumerian culture to the Neo-Babylonian. Although the scope of this chapter seems ambitious, its purpose is limited. The structure of judicial power and the general administration of justice in these cultures will not be treated here.1 This chapter restricts itself rather to the analysis of certain aspects of justice: the problem of the poor and the oppressed, the action of the government in response to them, and the reflection of such a problem in popu- lar piety.2 The concept of justice in ancient Mesopotamia embraces a broader meaning than our concepts of commutative, distributive, or social justice. It is not enough for the governor to promulgate good laws and supervise the keeping of these laws; in order for justice to have its place in the Mesopotamian world, he must also issue decrees of mercy that allow the restoration of a destabilized equality. This chapter studies the texts in chronological order. After an overview of early social and economic development in ancient Mesopotamia, it analyzes the first of social reforms undertaken there. It then goes on to consider the various Mesopotamian law codes, the decrees of mercy (“justice”), and the religious texts that reflect the situation facing the underclasses of Mesopotamia.3 1 For a study of the characteristic structures of judicial power as well as the adminis- tration of justice in general within the societies of ancient Mesopotamia, see Hans J.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Belief 06 Archeology
    Beyond Belief 06 God Revealed in History 01 – Archeology Archeology and the Scriptures Pre-flood period: A. Sumerian King List: B. Non-Biblical flood accounts Tower of Babel A. Enmerkar Epic B. This epic takes place in “Eridu” C. E-Abzu D. Unfinished foundation E. Language issues Patriarchs A. The Lament for Ur B. Desecration of Names C. Code of Hammurabi (Gen 37:28) D. Use of Camels E. The Gold of Valor (Gen 41:42) Captivity and Exodus A. Tomb of Rekmire (Slavery of Thutmose III) B. “Louvre Leather Roll” C. Ipuwer text D. Elephantine Stele (Life of Amenhotep II) E. The Dream Stele (Thutmose IV gains power, Exo 12:29). The Period of the Conquest A. The Balaam Inscription (Numbers 22) B. Jericho (Joshua 6) C. Hapiru (Canaan complaints about Hebrews) The Time of the Judges A. Egypt mentions Israel as the dominant people of the land B. The Mysterious Piym The Period of the Kings (United Kingdom, Early Israel) A. The things skeptics say - King David is like King Arthur B. Tel Dan Stele - “byt dwd” (House of David) Divided Kingdom A. Seal of Jeroboam B. We have archeological biblical name usage C. Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III (Jehu offering tribute) D. Hezekiah’s religious purge (Ex 20:24-25, Deut 12, 2 Chron 31:1) E. Isaiah Seal The Babylonian Conquest A. Bulla of Baruch (Jer 36:32) The New Testament Era A. Evidence Regarding Jesus - Flavious Josephus B. Evidence Supporting Luke and Acts C. Evidence of the Early Church – Pliny the Younger, Tacitus Questions for Discussion: Q1.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Ancient Near East: a Sourcebook
    WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Women in the Ancient Near East provides a collection of primary sources that further our understanding of women from Mesopotamian and Near Eastern civiliza- tions, from the earliest historical and literary texts in the third millennium BC to the end of Mesopotamian political autonomy in the sixth century BC. This book is a valuable resource for historians of the Near East and for those studying women in the ancient world. It moves beyond simply identifying women in the Near East to attempting to place them in historical and literary context, follow- ing the latest research. A number of literary genres are represented, including myths and epics, proverbs, medical texts, law collections, letters and treaties, as well as building, dedicatory, and funerary inscriptions. Mark W. Chavalas is Professor of History at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, where he has taught since 1989. Among his publications are the edited Emar: The History, Religion, and Culture of a Syrian Town in the Late Bronze Age (1996), Mesopotamia and the Bible (2002), and The Ancient Near East: Historical Sources in Translation (2006), and he has had research fellowships at Yale, Harvard, Cornell, Cal-Berkeley, and a number of other universities. He has nine seasons of exca- vation at various Bronze Age sites in Syria, including Tell Ashara/Terqa and Tell Mozan/Urkesh. ROUTLEDGE SOURCEBOOKS FOR THE ANCIENT WORLD HISTORIANS OF ANCIENT ROME, THIRD EDITION Ronald Mellor TRIALS FROM CLASSICAL ATHENS, SECOND EDITION Christopher Carey ANCIENT GREECE, THIRD EDITION Matthew Dillon and Lynda Garland READINGS IN LATE ANTIQUITY, SECOND EDITION Michael Maas GREEK AND ROMAN EDUCATION Mark Joyal, J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • MESHA STELE. Discovered at Dhiban in 1868 by a Protestant Missionary
    MESHA STELE. Discovered at Dhiban in 1868 by a Protestant missionary traveling in Transjordan, the 35-line Mesha Inscription (hereafter MI, sometimes called the Moabite Stone) remains the longest-known royal inscription from the Iron Age discovered in the area of greater Palestine. As such, it has been examined repeatedly by scholars and is available in a number of modern translations (ANET, DOTT). Formally, the MI is like other royal inscriptions of a dedicatory nature from the period. Mesha, king of Moab, recounts the favor of Moab's chief deity, Chemosh (Kemosh), in delivering Moab from the control of its neighbor, Israel. While the MI contains considerable historical detail, formal parallels suggest the Moabite king was selective in arranging the sequence of events to serve his main purpose of honoring Chemosh. This purpose is indicated by lines 3-4 of the MI, where Mesha says that he erected the stele at the "high place" in Qarh\oh, which had been built to venerate Chemosh. The date of the MI can be set with a 20-30-year variance. It must have been written either just before the Israelite king Ahab's death (ca. 853/852 B.C.) or a decade or so after his demise. The reference to Ahab is indicated by the reference in line 8 to Omri's "son," or perhaps "sons" (unfortunately, without some additional information, it is impossible to tell morphologically whether the word [bnh] is singular or plural). Ahab apparently died not long after the battle of Qarqar, in the spring of 853, when a coalition of states in S Syria/Palestine, of which Ahab was a leader, faced the encroaching Assyrians under Shalmaneser III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Code of Hammurabi: an Economic Interpretation
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 8; May 2011 The Code of Hammurabi: An Economic Interpretation K.V. Nagarajan Department of Economics, School of Commerce and Administration Laurentian University, Sudbury Canada E-mail: [email protected], Fax: 705-675-4886 Introduction Hammurabi was the ruler of Babylon from 1792 B.C. to 1750 B.C1. He is much celebrated for proclaiming a set of laws, called the Code of Hammurabi (The Code henceforward). The Code was written in the Akkadian language and engraved on black diorite, measuring about two-and-a-quarter meters. The tablet is on display in the Louvre, Paris. The stone carving on which the laws are written was found in 1901-1902 by French archeologists at the Edomite capital Susa which is now part of the Kuzhisthan province in Iran. The Code was determined to be written circa 1780 B.C. Although there are other codes preceding it2, The Code is considered the first important legal code known to historians for its comprehensive coverage of topics and wide-spread application. It has been translated and analyzed by historians, legal and theological scholars (Goodspeed, 1902; Vincent, 1904; Duncan, 1904; Pfeiffer, 1920; Driver and Miles, 1952). The Code is well- known for embodying the principle of lex talionis (“eye for an eye”) which is described as a system of retributive justice. However, The Code is also much more complex than just describing offenses and punishments and not all punishments are of the retributive kind. The Code has great relevance to economists. However, very few studies have been undertaken from an economic or economic thought point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • You Should Consider Nothing Good Which Has Its Beginning in Evil
    “You should consider nothing good which has its beginning in evil. The origin of the games is in shamelessness, in violence, in hate, in a fratricidal founder, in the son of the god of war.” – Tertullian, De Spectaculis V “But if I could account for the origin of these divine properties, then I might also be able to explain how they might cease to exist.” – Cicero, de Re Publica I.XXIV University of Alberta Violence, Pleasure, Civilization: Roman Gladiators and the Writing of History by Erin M. Stepney A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology ©Erin Stepney Fall 2013 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Dedication I would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the University of Alberta Departments of Sociology and of History and Classics, and of Drs. Kevin Haggerty, Stephen Hijmans, Paul Datta, Sandra Bingham, Jeremy Rossiter, Andrew Gow, Derek Sayer, Mike Gillespie, Bill Johnston, Haim Goldfuss, Peter Fabian, the late Sharon Rosenberg, the late Philip Stepney, and forever and always Richard Fletcher.
    [Show full text]
  • Asher-Greve / Westenholz Goddesses in Context ORBIS BIBLICUS ET ORIENTALIS
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 Goddesses in Context: On Divine Powers, Roles, Relationships and Gender in Mesopotamian Textual and Visual Sources Asher-Greve, Julia M ; Westenholz, Joan Goodnick Abstract: Goddesses in Context examines from different perspectives some of the most challenging themes in Mesopotamian religion such as gender switch of deities and changes of the status, roles and functions of goddesses. The authors incorporate recent scholarship from various disciplines into their analysis of textual and visual sources, representations in diverse media, theological strategies, typologies, and the place of image in religion and cult over a span of three millennia. Different types of syncretism (fusion, fission, mutation) resulted in transformation and homogenization of goddesses’ roles and functions. The processes of syncretism (a useful heuristic tool for studying the evolution of religions and the attendant political and social changes) and gender switch were facilitated by the fluidity of personality due to multiple or similar divine roles and functions. Few goddesses kept their identity throughout the millennia. Individuality is rare in the iconography of goddesses while visual emphasis is on repetition of generic divine figures (hieros typos) in order to retain recognizability of divinity, where femininity is of secondary significance. The book demonstrates that goddesses were never marginalized or extrinsic and thattheir continuous presence in texts, cult images, rituals, and worship throughout Mesopotamian history is testimony to their powerful numinous impact. This richly illustrated book is the first in-depth analysis of goddesses and the changes they underwent from the earliest visual and textual evidence around 3000 BCE to the end of ancient Mesopotamian civilization in the Seleucid period.
    [Show full text]