DOCSLIB.ORG

Fy17 Srtp/Cip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fy17 Srtp/Cip July 2017 Short Range Transit Plan and Capital Improvement Program Federal transportation statutes require that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in partnership with state and local agencies, develop and periodically update a long‐range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that implements the RTP by programming federal funds to transportation projects contained in the RTP. To effectively execute these planning and programming responsibilities, MTC requires that each transit operator in its region that receives federal funding through the TIP prepare, adopt, and submit to MTC a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) that includes a Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Schedule, cost, and performance data used to generate this SRTP/CIP were based upon the most current information available as of June 2017. Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1‐1 2 Overview of the BART System ....................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Governance ............................................................................................................... 2‐2 2.2 Organizational Structure ........................................................................................... 2‐2 2.3 Services Provided and Areas Served ......................................................................... 2‐5 2.4 Fares .......................................................................................................................... 2‐8 2.5 Customer Information ............................................................................................. 2‐13 2.6 Physical Infrastructure and Capital Assets .............................................................. 2‐13 3 BART Goal Areas, Objectives, and Performance Evaluation ........................................... 3‐1 3.1 Performance Measures for Four Strategic Plan Goal Areas ...................................... 3‐4 3.2 Ten‐Year Retrospective of BART System Performance ............................................. 3‐8 3.3 Compliance .............................................................................................................. 3‐16 4 Operating Service Plan and Financial Plan ..................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Long‐term Operating Financial Outlook .................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Operating Service Plan .............................................................................................. 4‐3 4.3 Operating Financial Plan ............................................................................................ 4‐8 5 Capital Improvement Program ...................................................................................... 5‐1 5.1 Capital Financial Outlook ........................................................................................... 5‐2 5.2 Capital Needs ............................................................................................................. 5‐8 5.3 Capital Funding ........................................................................................................ 5‐30 Appendix A: Acronym List ..................................................................................................... A‐1 Table of Figures Page Figure 2‐1 Milestones in BART History .................................................................................... 2‐1 Figure 2‐2 BART Board of Directors ........................................................................................ 2‐2 Figure 2‐3 Union Membership ................................................................................................ 2‐2 Figure 2‐4 BART Organizational Chart ..................................................................................... 2‐4 Figure 2‐5 BART Routes and Hours of Service ......................................................................... 2‐5 Figure 2‐6 BART Headways ..................................................................................................... 2‐5 Figure 2‐7 BART System Map .................................................................................................. 2‐6 Figure 2‐8 BART Fare Components and Ticket Prices (effective January 1, 2016)................ 2‐10 Figure 2‐9 BART Station‐to‐Station Fare Table (effective January 1, 2016) .......................... 2‐12 Figure 2‐10 BART Rail Vehicle Inventory ................................................................................. 2‐15 Figure 2‐11 BART Fare Collection Assets ................................................................................. 2‐20 Figure 2‐12 BART Access Hierarchy ......................................................................................... 2‐21 Figure 2‐13 BART Weekday Access Mode Shares ................................................................... 2‐22 Figure 2‐14 BART Bike Parking Supply .................................................................................... 2‐24 Figure 2‐15 BART Automobile Parking at Stations .................................................................. 2‐25 Figure 3‐1 BART Strategic Plan Framework............................................................................. 3‐3 Figure 3‐2 BART Strategic Plan Goal Area Performance ......................................................... 3‐6 Figure 3‐3 BART Ridership ....................................................................................................... 3‐9 Figure 3‐4 BART Annual Ridership (FY07‐FY16) ...................................................................... 3‐9 Figure 3‐5 BART Top 10 Ridership Days ................................................................................ 3‐10 Figure 3‐6 BART Average Weekday Trips by Market Area .................................................... 3‐10 Figure 3‐7 BART Revenue Service Hours and Miles .............................................................. 3‐13 Figure 3‐8 BART Operating Financial History ........................................................................ 3‐14 Figure 3‐9 FTA Triennial Review Findings ............................................................................. 3‐18 Figure 4‐1 BART Ridership Forecast ........................................................................................ 4‐4 Figure 4‐2 BART Rail Service Forecast ..................................................................................... 4‐7 Figure 4‐3 ADA Paratransit Projected Passengers and Productivity ....................................... 4‐8 Figure 4‐4 BART Operating Financial Forecast ...................................................................... 4‐10 Figure 5‐1 Capital Financial Outlook: Total Identified Need vs. Total Identified Funding ...... 5‐7 Figure 5‐2 Capital Needs by Type .......................................................................................... 5‐10 Figure 5‐3 CIP Investment Needs .......................................................................................... 5‐11 Figure 5‐4 Capital Funding Sources ....................................................................................... 5‐31 Figure 5‐5 Measure RR System Renewal Plan ‐ Summary of Investments ........................... 5‐34 1 INTRODUCTION This Fiscal Year 2017 Short Range Transit Plan/Capital Improvement Program (covering FY17‐FY26 for the SRTP and FY17‐FY31 for the CIP) forecasts BART’s operating and capital needs, including reinvestment and upgrades to its aging system and new investments to modernize and expand the system. This SRTP/CIP is presented in compliance with the requirements of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The purpose of the SRTP/CIP is to: Serve as a management and policy document for BART. Provide the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and MTC with required information to meet regional fund programming and planning criteria. Describe and validate BART’s capital and operating budgets. Inform requests for federal, state, and regional funds. Assess BART’s financial capacity to carry out proposed levels of service and the associated capital improvement program. Provide MTC with regular information on projects and programs of regional significance. Articulate goals, objectives, and standards by which BART assesses the system’s performance (also part of the MTC Triennial Performance Audit of the operator). BART is increasingly transforming its management practices to correspond with its Strategic Plan Framework, as adopted by the Board of Directors in October 2015. Per Board direction, the agency has committed to advancing the Vision statement: “BART supports a sustainable and prosperous Bay Area by connecting communities with seamless mobility.” The programs and projects described in this SRTP/CIP reflect the Strategic Plan Framework’s Mission Statement, goals and strategies. Specifically, over the next two years, BART will integrate the annual budget process, strategy‐based four‐year work plans, enhanced performance management, and an annual report under the umbrella of the Strategic Plan Framework. The SRTP/CIP is a forecasting tool that allows BART to identify potential financial challenges to its future operating budgets and capital project portfolio. BART’s financial capacity to carry out proposed levels of service and the associated capital improvement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caltrain Business Plan
    Caltrain Business Plan PROJECT UPDATE – SPRING 2019 What Addresses the future potential of the railroad over the next 20-30 years. It will assess the benefits, impacts, and costs of different What is service visions, building the case for investment and a plan for the Caltrain implementation. Business Plan? Why Allows the community and stakeholders to engage in developing a more certain, achievable, financially feasible future for the railroad based on local, regional, and statewide needs. 2 What Will the Business Plan Cover? Technical Tracks Service Business Case Community Interface Organization • Number of trains • Value from • Benefits and impacts to • Organizational structure • Frequency of service investments (past, surrounding communities of Caltrain including • Number of people present, and future) • Corridor management governance and delivery riding the trains • Infrastructure and strategies and approaches • Infrastructure needs operating costs consensus building • Funding mechanisms to to support different • Potential sources of • Equity considerations support future service service levels revenue 3 Where Are We in the Process? Board Adoption Stanford Partnership and Board Adoption of Board Adoption of of Scope Technical Team Contracting 2040 Service Vision Final Business Plan Initial Scoping Technical Approach Part 1: Service Vision Development Part 2: Business Implementation and Stakeholder Refinement, Partnering, Plan Completion Outreach and Contracting We Are Here 4 Electrification is the Foundation for Growth with Plans for
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • C<Uoln I£ »-I<;U Q£O SKU Op <U Rtf Uu> L, . 3 Kl 5 Z
    c <u o Ln I £ f—i »-i <; u Z Q O £ p o < S u K Z U 3 rtf 2 §u u > L, u £ a o . 3 Kl 5 z « £ > r A couple of visits by you to City Council meetings on June 2 and June 9 will almost certainly mean $15*000 worth of free hot lunches for Washington School children next year. On June 2 the Community Development Commission recom­ mendation to spend $1 5 ,0 0 0 next year for these children will be on Council agenda. The Council will probably send it to committee. The staff will probably recommend its passage and also funding for free hot lunches for two other schools. Then it will probably come up for a vote June 9 or maybe June 1 6 . We are doing trail-breaking work here. These lunches will be paid for by Federal block-grant funds and matched by Federal Nutri­ tion funds. The city has the money because the Potrero project cost less than expected. It won't cost the school district a cent. And it won't raise your property taxes. Thirty-three percent (33%) of these kids are on welfare. But they are our kids - they go to school in our community. Our community includes these children as well as people who are threatened by ammonia tanks. So even if you don't have children, and maybe especially if you don't have children - PLEAoE GO TO THESE MEETINGS. You people in Brickyard Cove - and on Western Drive - the councilmen know who you are.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan
    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority
    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020
    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE as of 12-11-2020 December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Samtrans Fast Facts
    SamTrans Fast Facts Administration The San Mateo County Transit District is the administrative body for the principal public transit and transportation pro- grams in San Mateo County, SamTrans bus service including Redi-Wheels and RediCoast paratransit service, Caltrain commuter rail and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. Caltrain and the TA have contracted with the District to serve as their managing agency, under the direction of their independent board of directors. The Board of Directors consists of nine members from various leadership positions in the community with the following composition: two members from the county Board of Supervisors; one transportation expert appointed by the Board of Supervisors; three city councilpersons, appointed by the City Selection Committee; and three public members, one of whom must reside on the coastside, appointed by the above six members. SamTrans Strategic Plan In December 2014, SamTrans approved its five-year Strategic Plan, a blueprint that will guide the policy decisions of the bus agency from 2015 to 2019. The plan focuses on five main goals: increasing bus ridership by 15 percent, growing passenger fare revenue by 20 percent, reducing annual debt service by $1.5 million, improving organizational perfor- mance and managing workforce change. SamTrans has already successfully pursued several of those goals. Due in large part to the changes implemented as a result of the SamTrans Service Plan—the most extensive reworking of bus operations along the Peninsula in a genera- tion—bus ridership is stabilizing, reversing years of stagnant growth. The bus agency also approved changes to its fare policy, aimed at restoring the agency’s fiscal health and achieving the goal of 20 percent fare revenue growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda Countywide Transportation Model
    ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION MODEL PLAN BAY AREA 2040 UPDATE Draft Documentation Report January, 2019 Alameda Countywide Travel Model Project #: 19752 January 10, 2019 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Alameda Countywide Transportation Model .......................................................................... i Plan Bay Area 2040 Update.................................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. v Summary ................................................................................................................................. vii Key Features ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Key Updates .......................................................................................................................................................... ix Selected Consistency Results ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coherent, Inc. 5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, Ca 95054
    COHERENT, INC. 5100 PATRICK HENRY DRIVE, SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 San Francisco International Airport (SFO) Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC) – is approximately 30 miles north of Santa Clara – is approximately 6 miles south of Santa Clara Website: https://www.flysfo.com/ 1701 Airport Boulevard, San Jose, CA 95110 Website: http://www.flysanjose.com/fl/ Directions: Get on US-101 S from International Terminal Arrivals Directions: Level - 1.4 mi http://www.flysanjose.com/fl/travelers.php?page=map s/to_here&exp=7 Follow US-101 South Leaving the rental car area, follow the signs to CA-87 Merge onto US-101 S to Lawrence Expressway in and US-101 North Sunnyvale (Exit 394 from US 101) - 27.5 mi Use the right lane to turn right on to Skyport Drive (430 Use the 2nd from the right lane to take Exit 394 for ft.) Lawrence Expressway - 0.3 mi Use the right lane to merge onto CA-87 via the ramp Follow Lawrence Expressway and Tasman Drive to to Hwy 101 N – 0.8 mi Patrick Henry Drive in Santa Clara - 1.7 mi Use the left 3 lanes to take exit 9B to merge onto Turn left on Patrick Henry Drive – Coherent is on your US-101 N toward San Francisco – 2.7 mi immediate left ___________________________ Take exit 393 to merge on to Great America Parkway – 1.4 mi Keep right at the fork & merge onto Great America Parkway – 1.5 mi Taxi from/to SFO and/or SJC airports: Use the left 2 lanes to turn left onto Tasman Drive - 0.4 SFO – you can have a sedan arranged for your arrival mi SJC – you can take a taxi or have a sedan arranged for your arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]