DOCSLIB.ORG

Dancing in Chains: a History of Friedrich Nietzsche's Physiological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dancing in Chains: a History of Friedrich Nietzsche's Physiological Dancing in Chains: A History of Friedrich Nietzsche’s Physiological Relativism BENJAMIN DAVID MITCHELL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO SEPTEMBER 2016 © Benjamin Mitchell, 2016 ii Abstract This study examines the historical development of Friedrich Nietzsche’s physiological relativism through a reading of his private and published works as well as several of the periodicals and scientific popularizations with which he was familiar. Nietzsche’s early interest in the relationship between genius and physiology was influenced by Arthur Schopenhauer’s insistence that geniuses were able to intuitively understand the objective world because of their unique physiological organization. However, the more physiology Nietzsche encountered the more doubts he had about Schopenhauer’s philosophical claims and Richard Wagner’s re- articulation of them. Nietzsche’s rejection of Schopenhauer and Wagner can be seen in his changing assessment of the limits of knowledge and the meaning of genius, of physiological, moral, and psychological vivisection, and how he came to see a close relationship between cruelty, necessity, and knowledge. Nietzsche’s understanding of life as a process of dynamic self-regulation featured many similarities with other physiological thinkers of his age including Claude Bernard and his idea of the milieu intérieur and Hermann von Helmholtz’s account of the active nature of perception. Nietzsche’s interest in educational reform, experimentation, and self- fashioning was a further development of his exploration of how organisms and individuals achieved a state of relative freedom and independence through their interdependence from their physical and cultural environments. His interest in the intersection of physiology, aesthetics, and epistemology led him to define meaningful freedom and creativity in terms of how individuals related to their own limitations and crafted new limitations for themselves. Even basic physiological perceptions were creative, for just as perceptions shaped ideas and experiences, ideas and experiences shaped perceptions. Nietzsche’s understanding of creativity within limits was the compliment of his idea of how an individual’s independence was achieved through more refined forms of interdependence with their physical, perceptual, cultural, and cosmic environments. The Übermensch was the culmination of this process, which Nietzsche described as “dancing in chains.” Just as organisms and individuals achieved states of relative independence through interdependence with their environments, the Übermensch’s independence was achieved through how they “tamed contingency” by assimilating the cosmos in its entirety by willing the eternal return of the same. iii Acknowledgments One of the major themes of this work is the close relationship between independence and interdependence; that they are not, in fact, opposites, but are essential for each other. We become more of our selves the more we work with others. With this in mind I would like to thank those who helped make this project possible. I would like to first thank my committee: Dr. Joan Steigerwald, Dr. Bernard Lightman, and Dr. Gregory Moore, as well as Dr. Ernst Hamm; I was fortunate to have for all practical purposes a committee of four instead of the usual three. I would also like to thank Dr. Brayton Polka for giving me invaluable insight into the inner workings of the cult of genius. I would also like to thank the Social Science and Humanities Research Council for the Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarship I received during my doctoral studies. My father, Allister Graham Mitchell, never completed high school. As far as I can tell he joined the military for stable work and to see the world. His curiosity and sense of wonder, and his encouragement that I, at least, should be formally educated, helped get me to where I am today. Many of the contributions I am thankful for went beyond the merely academic. Without this emotional labour my own intellectual labour would not have been possible. I would like to thank Dr. Aryn Martin, whose humane intervention helped me through the dreary December of 2015, as well as Dr. Gordon McOuat. His humane and inspiring council helped keep me alive at the end of my masters. My social support network has been invaluable; the eclectic collection of graduate students, goths, pagans, bohemians, farmers, convalescents, LGBTQ activists, pet groomers, and anarchists who I am pleased to call my friends. They have endured hearing my concerns and anxieties about the meaning of my work and its vicissitudes. Sarah and Brendan Tihane, Milo Nixon, Toby LePage, Dani Pacey, Scott Bohaker, Selena Phillips-Boyle, Max Baru, Abigaël Candelas de la Ossa, Alec Shaw, Vladislav Sekulic, and Steven Oickle, thank you for your presence. I would like to especially thank Gwyndaf Garbutt, my friend and housemate; Over the years I have been inspired by your dedication to what you think is right, your careful reflections, and personal endurance, and I am grateful for your friendship. iv Finally, I would like to thank my psychologist Dr. Jennifer Hilborn. She is the first person I have ever worked with who has been able to acknowledge the political dimensions of mental health in academia. This acknowledgement in and of itself has been healing, and she has done much more than merely acknowledge. Thank you for helping me feel heard, and worthy of being heard. Academia is facing a crisis of its mental health and wellbeing. More of us need to realize that as intellectual and emotional labourers we suffer from intellectual and emotional ailments. The hierarchies we participate in are abusive and lacking in transparency. These are not just personal problems that we have to face alone. They are systemic artefacts of the neoliberal university and they affect all of us. The sooner we turn our hard-earned skills to understanding and dismantling this classist edifice, the sooner we can change what it means to be not just scholars of the humanities, but humane scholars, and set up a welcoming hearth in place of this ivory tower. v Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... v List of Illustrations ......................................................................................................... vii Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One: [The Frame of Genius] ............................................................................ 20 [Embodying Genius: Schopenhauer’s Indifferent Ideal] ................................... 24 [The Rebirth of Schopenhauer from the Spirit of Wagner] ............................... 30 [The Artistic Lange: Lange, Socrates, and Genius] ........................................... 35 [Lange’s Comparisons and von Baer’s lecture “Which Conception of Living Nature is the Correct One?”]............................................................................... 40 [The Timely Meditations] ................................................................................... 51 [Wagner, All Too Wagner] ................................................................................. 57 [Conclusion] ........................................................................................................ 64 Chapter Two: [Nietzsche as Vivisectionist] .................................................................... 67 [Schopenhauer’s Mercies: Wagner, Weber, and Antivivisection in Germany] .. 71 [The Curare-arrow of Knowledge] ...................................................................... 80 [Zöllner’s Psychological Vivisection] ................................................................. 90 [The Bayreuther Blätter and the Brothers Förster] ............................................. 101 [Knowledge as Cruelty] ...................................................................................... 105 [Conclusion] ........................................................................................................ 113 Chapter Three: [A Vision of Self-Regulation] ................................................................ 116 [Nietzsche, Organic Unity, and the Importance of the Internal Environment] ... 120 [Liebig, Bernard, and Nietzsche on Individual and Organic Independence] ...... 122 [Connections Between Nietzsche and Bernard] .................................................. 128 [Hiding in the Realm of a Transfigured Physis] .................................................. 136 [The Free Spirit’s Mutual Education] .................................................................. 142 [Nietzsche and Experimentation] ......................................................................... 151 [Conclusion] ......................................................................................................... 159 Chapter Four: [Physio-aesthetic Epistemology and the Freedom of the Übermensch] ... 162 [Nietzsche on Perception: Physiological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Form Without Matter, Was an Essay in the Philosophy of Perception Written in the Medium of Historiography
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilPapers Sympathy in Perception Mark Eli Kalderon i I focused at intervals as the great dome loomed up through the smoke. Glares of many fires and sweeping clouds of smoke kept hiding the shape. Then a wind sprang up. Suddenly, the shining cross, dome and towers stood out like a symbol in the inferno. The scene was unbelievable. In that moment or two I released my shutter. Herbert Mason Contents Preface iii Acknowledgements ix 1 Grasping 1 1.1 The Dawn of Understanding ...................... 1 1.2 Haptic Perception ............................ 4 1.3 The Protagorean Model ......................... 10 1.4 Assimilation ............................... 13 1.5 Shaping .................................. 21 1.6 Active Wax ................................ 27 1.7 A Puzzle ................................. 30 2 Sympathy 37 2.1 Haptic Metaphysics ........................... 37 2.2 The Dependence upon Bodily Awareness ............... 39 2.3 Against Haptic Indirect Realism .................... 44 2.4 Sympathy ................................. 46 2.5 Sensing Limits .............................. 52 2.6 TheStoics ................................ 58 2.7 Plotinus .................................. 61 2.8 The Principle of Haptic Presentation ................. 69 3 Sound 79 3.1 Moving Forward ............................. 79 3.2 The Berkeley–Heidegger Continuum ................. 82 3.3 The Bearers of Audible Qualities .................... 87 3.4 The Extent of the Audible ....................... 91 3.5 TheWaveTheory ............................ 95 3.6 Auditory Perspective .......................... 101 3.7 Phenomenological Objections ..................... 104 i ii CONTENTS 4 Sources 117 4.1 The Heideggerian Alternative ..................... 117 4.2 The Function of Audition ........................ 118 4.3 Sources and the Discrimination of Sound ............... 121 4.4 Sympathy and Auditory Presentation ................. 125 4.5 Listening ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and Psychedelics – Peter Sjöstedt-H –
    Antichrist Psychonaut: Nietzsche and Psychedelics – Peter Sjöstedt-H – ‘… And close your eyes with holy dread, For he on honey-dew hath fed, And drunk the milk of Paradise.’ So ends the famous fragment of Kubla Khan by the Romantic poet, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. He tells us that the poem was an immediate transcription of an opium-induced dream he experienced in 1797. As is known, the Romantic poets and their kin were inspired by the use of psychoactive substances such as opium, the old world’s common pain reliever. Pain elimination is its negative advantage, but its positive attribute lies in the psychedelic (‘mind- revealing’)1 state it can engender – a state described no better than by the original English opium eater himself, Thomas De Quincey: O just and righteous opium! … thou bildest upon the bosom of darkness, out of the fantastic imagery of the brain, cities and temples, beyond the art of Phidias and Praxiteles – beyond the splendours of Babylon and Hekatómpylos; and, “from the anarchy of dreaming sleep,” callest into sunny light the faces of long-buried beauties … thou hast the keys of Paradise, O just, subtle, and mighty opium!2 Two decades following the publication of these words the First Opium War commences (1839) in which China is martially punished for trying to hinder the British trade of opium to the Chinese people. Though opium, derived from the innocent garden poppy Papavar somniferum, may cradle the keys to Paradise it also clutches the keys to Perdition: its addictive thus potentially ruinous nature is commonly known. Today, partly for these reasons, opiates are mostly illegal without license – stringently so in their most potent forms of morphine and heroin.
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying the Saint
    DEMYSTIFYING THE SAINT: JAY L. GARFIELDʼS RATIONAL RECONSTRUCTION OF NĀGĀRJUNAʼS MĀDHYAMAKA AS THE EPITOME OF CONTEMPORARY CROSS-CULTURAL PHILOSOPHY TIINA ROSENQVIST Tampereen yliopisto Yhteiskunta- ja kulttuuritieteiden yksikkö Filosofian pro gradu -tutkielma Tammikuu 2011 ABSTRACT Cross-cultural philosophy approaches philosophical problems by setting into dialogue systems and perspectives from across cultures. I use the term more specifically to refer to the current stage in the history of comparative philosophy marked by the ethos of scholarly self-reflection and the production of rational reconstructions of foreign philosophies. These reconstructions lend a new kind of relevance to cross-cultural perspectives in mainstream philosophical discourses. I view Jay L. Garfieldʼs work as an example of this. I examine Garfieldʼs approach in the context of Nāgārjuna scholarship and cross-cultural hermeneutics. By situating it historically and discussing its background and implications, I wish to highlight its distinctive features. Even though Garfield has worked with Buddhist philosophy, I believe he has a lot to offer to the meta-level discussion of cross-cultural philosophy in general. I argue that the clarity of Garfieldʼs vision of the nature and function of cross-cultural philosophy can help alleviate the identity crisis that has plagued the enterprise: Garfield brings it closer to (mainstream) philosophy and helps it stand apart from Indology, Buddhology, area studies philosophy (etc). I side with Garfield in arguing that cross- cultural philosophy not only brings us better understanding of other philosophical traditions, but may enhance our self-understanding as well. I furthermore hold that his employment of Western conceptual frameworks (post-Wittgensteinian language philosophy, skepticism) and theoretical tools (paraconsistent logic, Wittgensteinian epistemology) together with the influence of Buddhist interpretative lineages creates a coherent, cogent, holistic and analytically precise reading of Nāgārjunaʼs Mādhyamaka philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and the Pathologies of Meaning
    Nietzsche and the Pathologies of Meaning Jeremy James Forster Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Jeremy James Forster All rights reserved ABSTRACT NIETZSCHE AND THE PATHOLOGIES OF MEANING Jeremy Forster My dissertation details what Nietzsche sees as a normative and philosophical crisis that arises in modern society. This crisis involves a growing sense of malaise that leads to large-scale questions about whether life in the modern world can be seen as meaningful and good. I claim that confronting this problem is a central concern throughout Nietzsche’s philosophical career, but that his understanding of this problem and its solution shifts throughout different phases of his thinking. Part of what is unique to Nietzsche’s treatment of this problem is his understanding that attempts to imbue existence with meaning are self-undermining, becoming pathological and only further entrenching the problem. Nietzsche’s solution to this problem ultimately resides in treating meaning as a spiritual need that can only be fulfilled through a creative interpretive process. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter I: The Birth of Tragedy and the Problem of Meaning 30 Part I: Background 33 Part II: Meaningfulness in Artistic Cultures 45 Part III: Meaningfulness in Tragic Cultures 59 Part IV: Meaningfulness in Socratic Cultures 70 Conclusion: The Solution to Socratism 78 Chapter II: Meaning, Science, and the “Perceptions of Science
    [Show full text]
  • Vivisection from an Ethical Point of View
    VIVISECTION FROM AN ETHICAL POINT OF VIEW. THE EVILS OF VIVISECTION. From personal experience and a near relationship with hospitals, schools, biological laboratories, and experimental work-rooms, I know that I am right in believing that my scientific brethren ought to be supervised, cautioned, and re^ strained by a firm hand. Alas, I know full well, as myself a worker, that our work called Science, as now pursued, is not an end in itself, fails as yet to point out the solution of all life, and in the case of many of its votaries has produced a narrow- mg scholastic result. So thought in large degree, so lived in the inspiration of his research, so often taught by his action, my departed friend Professor Cope. To my mind the enthusiastic advocates of humanity and mercy, often weak of mind, hardly ever logical, are after all in the deepest sense right, because of no self- indulgent weakness have some of us encouraged them as far as reason permits, in the attempt to restrain and supervise the whole thing. Let them take it out of the hands of the conceited doctor, or the smart biological assistant. You know what I mean. With us your voice should speak. To shrink from cruelty, from the sight of torture as we shrink from a vile smell, from the ravages of disease, or an act of barbarism, as a thing to shudder at, as a thing that runs through you, and changes the heart-beat whether or no. This, to my mind, is an unfolding of the deeper meaning of that struggle to which you allude.
    [Show full text]
  • Lotze and the Early Cambridge Analytic Philosophy
    LOTZE AND THE EARLY CAMBRIDGE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY ―This summer I‘ve read about a half of Lotze‘s Metaphysik. He is the most delectable, certainly, of all German writers—a pure genius.‖ William James, September 8, 1879.1 Summary Many historians of analytic philosophy consider the early philosophy of Moore, Russell and Wittgenstein as much more neo-Hegelian as once believed. At the same time, the authors who closely investigate Green, Bradley and Bosanquet find out that these have little in common with Hegel. The thesis advanced in this chapter is that what the British (ill-named) neo-Hegelians brought to the early analytic philosophers were, above all, some ideas of Lotze, not of Hegel. This is true regarding: (i) Lotze’s logical approach to practically all philosoph- ical problems; (ii) his treating of the concepts relation, structure (constructions) and order; (iii) the discussion of the concepts of states of affairs, multiple theory of judgment, general logical form; (iv) some common themes like panpsychism and contemplating the world sub specie aeternitatis. 1. LOTZE, NOT HEGEL, LIES AT THE BOTTOM OF CAMBRIDGE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY Conventional wisdom has it that the early philosophy of Moore and Russell was under the strong sway of the British ―neo-Hegelians‖. In the same time, however, those historians who investigate the British ―neo-Hegelians‖ of 1880–1920 in detail, turn attention to the fact that the latter are not necessarily connected with Hegel: William Sweet made this point in regard to 1 Perry (1935), ii, p. 16. Bosanquet,2 Geoffrey Thomas in regard to Green,3 and Peter Nicholson in regard to Bradley.4 Finally, Nicholas Griffin has shown that Russell from 1895–8, then an alleged neo-Hegelian, ―was very strongly influenced by Kant and hardly at all by Hegel‖.5 These facts are hardly surprising, if we keep in mind that the representatives of the school of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Epistemic Truth and Excluded Middle* Cesare Cozzo Abstract
    Penultimate draft of a paper published in in Theoria, a Swedish journal of philosophy, LXIV 2-3, Thales, Stockholm 1998, pp. 243-282. Epistemic truth and excluded middle* Cesare Cozzo Università di Roma ”La Sapienza” Dipartimento di studi filosofici ed epistemologici email: [email protected] Abstract: Can an epistemic conception of truth and an endorsement of the excluded middle (together with other principles of classical logic abandoned by the intuitionists) cohabit in a plausible philosophical view? In PART I I describe the general problem concerning the relation between the epistemic conception of truth and the principle of excluded middle. In PART II I give a historical overview of different attitudes regarding the problem. In PART III I sketch a possible holistic solution. Part I The Problem §1. The epistemic conception of truth. The epistemic conception of truth can be formulated in many ways. But the basic idea is that truth is explained in terms of epistemic notions, like experience, argument, proof, knowledge, etc. One way of formulating this idea is by saying that truth and knowability coincide, i.e. for every statement S i) it is true that S if, and only if, it is (in principle) possible to know that S. Knowledge that S can be equated with possession of a correct (or ideal) finite argument for S in an optimal (or ideal) epistemic situation. For example, mathematical knowledge can be equated with possession of a proof of a mathematical statement. But the notion of ideal argument should be wider than the notion of proof: for empirical statements like “strawberries contain sugar” an ideal argument should contain also some sensory evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School April 2021 Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis William A. B. Parkhurst University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Parkhurst, William A. B., "Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis" (2021). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8839 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence: Methods, Archives, History, and Genesis by William A. B. Parkhurst A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Joshua Rayman, Ph.D. Lee Braver, Ph.D. Vanessa Lemm, Ph.D. Alex Levine, Ph.D. Date of Approval: February 16th, 2021 Keywords: Fredrich Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, History of Philosophy, Continental Philosophy Copyright © 2021, William A. B. Parkhurst Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my mother, Carol Hyatt Parkhurst (RIP), who always believed in my education even when I did not. I am also deeply grateful for the support of my father, Peter Parkhurst, whose support in varying avenues of life was unwavering. I am also deeply grateful to April Dawn Smith. It was only with her help wandering around library basements that I first found genetic forms of diplomatic transcription.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's Engagements with Kant and the Kantian Legacy, Vol
    Nietzsche's Engagements with Kant and the Kantian Legacy, vol. 1: Nietzsche, Kant, and the Problem of Metaphysics ed. by Marco Brusotti and Herman Siemens (review) Justin Remhof The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Volume 52, Issue 1, Spring 2021, pp. 177-184 (Review) Published by Penn State University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/788332 [ Access provided at 22 Apr 2021 16:37 GMT from Old Dominion Libraries & (Viva) ] BOOK REVIEWS | 177 Rather than reducing the will to power to individual aggressivity, this idea must at least be understood historically such that it accommodates Nietzsche’s abiding sense that early human existence was “constantly imperiled” (D 18, see also D 23), and that we were the “most endangered animal” in dire need of “help and protection” (GS 354; see also GM II:19, III:13). It is under these circumstances that our will to power initially emerges. It is surely against this backdrop that Nietzsche accepts the ethnological vision of prehistoric humans surviving in a variety of kin-based communities (Geschlechtsgenossenschaften), from the most basic largely promiscuous and egalitarian matriarchal hordes to more hierarchical, patriarchal, and ordered tribal associations. These dif- ferent kinds of kin-based communities can exist at the same time and wage desperate wars with each other for survival. It is only such a view that makes sense of the sudden appearance of those “unconscious artists” who are “orga- nized on a war footing [. .] with the power to organize” (GM II:17), such that they can take advantage of the less organized, more peaceful communities.
    [Show full text]
  • František Kupka: Sounding­ Abstraction – Musicality, Colour and Spiritualism
    Issue No. 2/2019 František Kupka: Sounding Abstraction – Musicality, Colour and Spiritualism Anna-Maria von Bonsdorff, PhD, Chief Curator, Finnish National Gallery / Ateneum Art Museum, Helsinki Also published in Anne-Maria Pennonen, Hanne Selkokari and Lene Wahlsten (eds.), František Kupka. Ateneum Publications Vol. 114. Helsinki: Finnish National Gallery / Ateneum Art Museum 2019, 11–25. Transl. Tomi Snellman The art of František Kupka (1871–1957) has intrigued artists, art historians and exhibition visitors for many decades. Although nowadays Kupka’s name is less well known outside artistic circles, in his day he was one of the artists at the forefront in creating abstract paintings on the basis of colour theory and freeing colours from descriptive associations. Today his energetic paintings are still as enigmatic and exciting as they were in 1912, when his completely non- figurative canvases, including Amorpha, Fugue in Two Colours and Amorpha, Warm Chromatics, created a scandal when they were shown in the Salon d’Automne in Paris. It marked a turning point in many ways, not least in the decision of the Gaumont Film Company to use Kupka’s abstract works for the news in cinemas in France, Germany, the United States and England.1 And as we will see, Kupka’s far-reaching shift to abstraction was a long process which grew partly out of his childhood interest in spiritualism and partly from Symbolist and occultist ideas to crystallise into the concept of an art which could be seen, felt and understood on a more multisensory basis. Kupka’s art reflects the idea of musicality in art, colour and spiritualism.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinrich Rommen, the Natural Law: a Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy (1936)
    Rommen_0017 09/15/2005 09:46 AM THE ONLINE LIBRARY OF LIBERTY © Liberty Fund, Inc. 2005 http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/index.php HEINRICH ROMMEN, THE NATURAL LAW: A STUDY IN LEGAL AND SOCIAL HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY (1936) URL of this E-Book: http://oll.libertyfund.org/EBooks/Rommen_0017.pdf URL of original HTML file: http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/HTML.php?recordID=0017 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Heinrich Rommen was a Catholic German lawyer who practised in Germany during the Weimar Republic before fleeing to the United States in 1938. He taught in Germany and England before concluding his distinguished scholarly career at Georgetown University. ABOUT THE BOOK Originally published in German in 1936, The Natural Law is the first work to clarify the differences between traditional natural law as represented in the writings of Cicero, Aquinas, and Hooker and the revolutionary doctrines of natural rights espoused by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Beginning with the legacies of Greek and Roman life and thought, Rommen traces the natural law tradition to its displacement by legal positivism and concludes with what the author calls "the reappearance" of natural law thought in more recent times. In seven chapters each Rommen explores "The History of the Idea of Natural Law" and "The Philosophy and Content of the Natural Law." In his introduction, Russell Hittinger places Rommen’s work in the context of contemporary debate on the relevance of natural law to philosophical inquiry and constitutional interpretation. THE EDITION USED The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy, trans. Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfecting Nature
    Perfecting Nature: Friedrich Nietzsche's Ideal and Politics of Cultivation by Dr Adriano Dino Cugola Deakin University 1990 Table of contents Synopsis ....................................................................................................................... 5 Foreword ..................................................................................................................... 6 1 - Elements of the Ideal of Cultivation .................................................................... 7 Rational Consciousness: the Idea of Physis ........................................................... 7 Perfecting Nature ................................................................................................... 8 Division of labour ................................................................................................ 10 Individuality in civilisation................................................................................... 10 The politics of cultivation ..................................................................................... 11 Secular and non-secular orientations .................................................................. 12 Posterity ............................................................................................................... 14 The Axial Age ....................................................................................................... 14 2 - Types of the Ideal of Cultivation ........................................................................ 16 The
    [Show full text]