THE GREAT HYPOSTYLE HALL in the TEMPLE of AMUN at KARNAK Volume I, Part 2: TRANSLATION and COMMENTARY By: Peter J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE GREAT HYPOSTYLE HALL in the TEMPLE of AMUN at KARNAK Volume I, Part 2: TRANSLATION and COMMENTARY By: Peter J THE GREAT HYPOSTYLE HALL IN THE TEMPLE OF AMUN AT KARNAK Volume I, Part 2: TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY By: Peter J. Brand and William J. Murnane† INTRODUCTION In this volume, we will treat the reliefs copied by Nelson in an order somewhat different from that adopted in his volume of plates,1 which divided the Hall into southern and northern sectors and treated all elements in each area in a generally counter-clockwise sequence. In this work, scenes that lie on related architectural elements—specifically, the western portal (GHHK I.1, pls. 1-4, 131-134) and the eastern vestibule (ibid., pls. 110-118, 233-257)—will be grouped together, even when the different parts were decorated at separate periods. A few notes on translation: the reader will notice that we have translated some commonly occuring words and phrases differently from how they are traditionally rendered in English. Thus we translate nsw- bi.ty as “dual king” rather than “king of Upper and Lower Egypt” because these terms are frequently used independently of each other in a manner that does not suggest that they were geographically restrictive. Thus kings may be referred collectively as bit.yw with the connotation of “ancestral kings” or “kings of old.” Likewise, the term nsw used independently to refer to the king is so common as a designation of the general office of kingship that it seems unlike that it is to be restricted to Upper Egypt alone. Instead, nsw and bi.ty connote two different aspects of kingship, hence the translation “dual king.” Another common term refering to the king is Hm=f, traditionally translated as “his majesty.” We firmly believe, however, that Hm indicates the bodily form or incarnation of a divine being (including the king).2 As a result, the admittedly awkward “his person” is prefered while Hm used by itself becomes “incarnation.” 1 Harold H. Nelson, The Great Hypostyle Hall in the Temple of Amun at Karnak, vol. I, part 1, The Wall Reliefs, OIP 106 (Chicago, 1981). Hereafter GHHK I.1. 2 More work remains to be done with the term Hm, but see now J. Spiegel, “Die Grundbedeutung des Stammes Hm,” ZÄS 75 (1939), pp. 112-121. 1 Plan of the Hypostyle Hall showing the main architectural divsions containing wall scenes. 2 WEST WALL, PORTAL (Plates 1-4, 41 left, 131-134, 262) Scenes inscribed on the façade of this doorway were recarved over the original sunk relief decoration on the eastern gateway of the Second Pylon, a structure built by Horemheb and decorated under him and his successor, Ramesses I. Horemheb, who inscribed the façade and interior of the Second Pylon’s vestibule, may also have carved the earliest sunk relief decoration on the east face of the pylon, including the east facing jambs of the gate.3 This is not entirely certain, as Ramesses I inscribed a decorative frieze of his cartouche names on the now missing top of the pylon towers (just below the torus molding).4 We now know that Ramesses I also decorated the eastern end of the passage leading through the Second Pylon,5 and it is no doubt for this reason that Sety I chose to recognize his father when he reinscribed the doorway of his new columned hall.6 As first carved under Sety, the doorjambs featured both kings, officiating in alternating scenes.7 Ramesses II would later usurp the cartouches in all these tableaux, and he would also convert Sety I’s raised work on the southern jamb to sunk relief (plan 1). This was in keeping with his practice elsewhere in the Hall’s southern half, where he sought to homogenize his earlier work with the incised carvings of his later periods.8 Today, the gateway is preserved to a level slightly below its missing lintel that had not only bridged both sides of the door, but also the towers of the Second Pylon. The top of each jamb survives, although only part of a frieze that once surmounted them remains (north: GHHK I.1, pl. 262; south: ibid. pl. 41 left). This frieze’s design is a standard one, with cartouches arranged in pairs—the king’s prenomen and nomen alternating—each crowned by a solar disk and resting on a .9 Cobras flank the prenomen cartouches on either side, facing away from the cartouche between them. Each serpent wears a sun disk on its head, and its tail flows through . 3 See Keith C. Seele, The Coregency of Ramses II with Seti I and the Date of the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak, SAOC 19 (Chicago, 1940), pp. 12-22; Peter J. Brand, Monuments of Seti I: Epigraphic, Historical and Art Historical Analysis, Probleme der Ägyptolgie 16 (Leiden, 2000), pp. 4-5. 4 Dozens of unpublished blocks from this frieze—later suppressed and reinscribed by Ramesses II—remain in the block yards between the main temple and that of Khonsu to the south. 5 To be published by the expedition of the University of Memphis’ Institute of Egyptian Art and Archaeology: for a preliminary report see William J. Murnane, “Egyptian Monuments and Historical Memory: New Light on the Ancients’ ‘Uses of the Past’ from the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak,” KMT (Fall 1994), pp. 15-24, 88; William J. Murnane et al., “The Karnak Hypostyle Hall Project: (1992-2002), ASAE 78 (2004), pp. 98-102 and figs. 7-10, 46-55. 6 As well as several scenes on the top register of the north wing of the west wall proper. See below commentary to pls. 138, 140-142. 7 William J. Murnane, “Ramesses I and the Building of the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak Revisited.” in Iubilate Conlegae: Egyptological Studies in Memory of A. A. Sadek, ed. C.C. Van Siclen, VA 10.2-3 (1995), pp. 163-168; Murnane et al., ASAE 78 (2004), p. 101 and fig. 17. 8 Seele, Coregency, pp. 53-60. See above, chapter 2.3.1 and 2.5. 9 Similar friezes are found in various contemporary Theban temples. So in the Gurnah temple hypostyle hall and at the top of the piers in the Ramesseum’s second court, both with the prenomen flanked by uraei. In the vestibule to the Ramesses I suite at Gurnah, however, the nomen is flanked by the uraei. Moreover, in all these examples, the cartouches sit atop -signs, not on -basket as on the West gateway. 3 Sety I inscribed this face of the doorway in raised relief, and on the jambs, he alternated scenes in his own name (GHHK I.1, pls. 2, 4, 132, 134) with others carved in the name of his deceased father Ramesses I (ibid., pls. 1, 3, 131, 133).10 Ultimately, Ramesses II usurped the royal names of his father and grandfather in sunk relief. On the north jamb (ibid., pls. 131-134), he only recarved hieroglyphic signs within the royal cartouche rings and Horus-name serekh (ibid., pl. 133) as sunken relief. Otherwise, Ramesses II left Sety’s raised relief decoration on this jamb intact. However, on the south jamb (ibid., pls. 1-4) of the doorway, Ramesses II also converted Sety’s raised relief into sunk, as he did with the rest of Sety’s decoration carved in that medium south of the central axis along with his own early bas reliefs there. When Ramesses II replaced the names of his forbearers with his own on the jambs of this gateway, he used the nomen Ra-ms-s everywhere except in the upper two uppermost scenes from the north jamb and in the top frieze just above them (GHHK I.1, pls. 131-132), where Ra-ms-sw occurs. Ra-ms-sw, as can be observed in the southern part of the Great Hall, was occasionally Ramesses’ spelling of his personal name prior to his second regnal year when it coexisted with Ra-ms-s. But when he changed his prenomen to its final form, Wsr-mAa.t-Ra-stp.n.Ra, he altered the spelling of his nomen to Ra-ms-s and continued to write it thus until after the twenty-first year of his reign, from which point the nomen was always written Ra-ms-sw.11 The situation is puzzling,12 however there are rare instances elsewhere in which the two nomen orthographies appear to coexist after year two and before year 21 in the Luxor Temple forecourt.13 Sety I left a space corresponding to the height of a full register uncarved beneath the lowest scene on each jamb. This emptiness is most striking on the north side of the door, where a limestone dyad, dating to the late Eighteenth Dynasty and portraying Amun and a king, now stands.14 On the south side of the portal, 10 See Murnane, VA 10 (1994), pp. 166-168; Brand, Monuments of Seti I, pp. 208, 215. 11 Kenneth A. Kitchen, “Aspects of Ramesside Egypt,” in Actes du premier congrès international d’égyptologie. 2–10 octobre 1976, ed. W. F. Reineke, Schriften zur Geschichte und Kulture des Alten Orients 14, (Berlin, 1979), pp. 383-387. 12 One might expect that Ramesses made all these usurpations at the same time rather than at widely separated intervals. His conversions of raised relief on the south jamb would have been done fairly early in the reign while his nomen was still Ra-ms-s, as with replacements of Sety’s raised relief on the south half of the west wall (see our commentary to GHHK I.1, pls. 31-33 below). Ramesses II’s usurpations and additions of new decoration in the northern half of the building were done sometime after his year 21 when the nomen was Ra-ms-sw.
Recommended publications
  • The Presence of Myth in the Pyramid Texts
    The Presence of Myth in the qnamid Texts A thesis submitted in conformity with the nquirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Near and Middk Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto National CiBrary Bibiioth ue nationale u*m of Canada du Cana% The author has granteci a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive ticence allowing the exclusive pennettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, Ioan, distri'btûe or sen reproduire, prêter, disbn'buer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de microfiche/& de reproduction sur papier ou sur fomiat électronique. The author retains ownership ofthe L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the choit d'auteur qni protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantid exûacts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être miphés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. THE PRESENCE OF MYTH IN THE PYRAMID TEXTS Doctor of Philosophy 200 1 Jeder Elisabeth Hellum Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto The Pyramid Texts, written on the waUs of the entrance corridors, antechambers, and funerary chambers of the royal pyramids of the late Fiifth and entire Skth Dynasties, are filied with mythic statements and allusions, without using prose or poetic narrative. They hctioned as a holistic group, each distinct from the other, yet each working within the group to create a situation paraHehg the mythic, celestial worid of the afterlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth Fonctions Et Usages Du Mythe Égyptien
    Revue de l’histoire des religions 4 | 2018 Qu’est-ce qu’un mythe égyptien ? Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth Fonctions et usages du mythe égyptien Katja Goebs and John Baines Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rhr/9334 DOI: 10.4000/rhr.9334 ISSN: 2105-2573 Publisher Armand Colin Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2018 Number of pages: 645-681 ISBN: 978-2-200-93200-8 ISSN: 0035-1423 Electronic reference Katja Goebs and John Baines, “Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth”, Revue de l’histoire des religions [Online], 4 | 2018, Online since 01 December 2020, connection on 13 January 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/rhr/9334 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rhr.9334 Tous droits réservés KATJA GOEBS / JOHN BAINES University of Toronto / University of Oxford Functions and Uses of Egyptian Myth* This article discusses functions and uses of myth in ancient Egypt as a contribution to comparative research. Applications of myth are reviewed in order to present a basic general typology of usages: from political, scholarly, ritual, and medical applications, through incorporation in images, to linguistic and literary exploitations. In its range of function and use, Egyptian myth is similar to that of other civilizations, except that written narratives appear to have developed relatively late. The many attested forms and uses underscore its flexibility, which has entailed many interpretations starting with assessments of the Osiris myth reported by Plutarch (2nd century AD). Myths conceptualize, describe, explain, and control the world, and they were adapted to an ever-changing reality. Fonctions et usages du mythe égyptien Cet article discute les fonctions et les usages du mythe en Égypte ancienne dans une perspective comparatiste et passe en revue ses applications, afin de proposer une typologie générale de ses usages – applications politiques, érudites, rituelles et médicales, incorporation dans des images, exploitation linguistique et littéraire.
    [Show full text]
  • OK PASSOVER PRODUCTS FOOD GUIDE 2020 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES Aluminum 10" Round Pan Multipeel (O) Barkan Wine Cellars Ltd
    OK PASSOVER PRODUCTS FOOD GUIDE 2020 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES Aluminum 10" Round Pan Multipeel (O) Barkan Wine Cellars Ltd. Aluminum 3lb Large Oval Bakin Nalo Faser / Fibrous- cellulose Givon Vodka Aluminum 4 4/5" Round Pan casings with paper (O) Courvoisier SAS Aluminum 5lb X-large Oval Bak Nalo Ferm (O) XO Cognac Courvoisier Size: Aluminum 8" Angel Tube Pan Nalo Kranz-pure cellulose casings 700ml Lot: L9162JCG01, Aluminum 8" Round Pan (O) L6202JCG05 Aluminum Medium Oval Baking Nalo ML-pure cellulose casings Le Cognac de Napoleon P (O) XO Cognac Courvoisier Size: Nicole Home Collection Nalo M-pure cellulose casings 700ml Lot: L9162JCG01, (O) 8" Square Cake Pan Aluminum L6202JCG05 Nalo Net-fibrous casing with net 9" Square Deep Cake Pan- Matar Winery (O) alumin Arak Nalo Schmal / Cellulose- pure Aluminum 10" Angel Tube Royal Wine Corporation cellulose casings (O) Pan Alfasi - Mistico (MV) Nalo Top - cellulose casings with Aluminum 10" Round Pan ALUMINUM WRAP PRODUCTS paper (O) Aluminum 3lb Large Oval Bakin Betty Crocker NaloFashion (O) Aluminum 4 4/5" Round Pan 25Sq ft Aluminum Foil (O) OSKUDA 2101 (O) Aluminum 5lb X-large Oval Bak 37.5Sq ft Aluminum Foil (O) Pergament (O) Aluminum 8" Angel Tube Pan 75Sq ft Aluminum Foil (O) Rona (O) Aluminum 8" Round Pan Formula Brands Inc. Ronet (O) Aluminum Medium Oval Baking 25Sq ft Aluminum Foil (O) Rotex (O) P 37.5Sq ft Aluminum Foil (O) Texdalon (O) AROMATIC CHEMICALS 75Sq ft Aluminum Foil (O) Texdalon KSB - Semi Finished Crown Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Guangzhou Huafeng Aluminum (O) Piperonal Foil Technologies Co Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum
    Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from The British Museum Resource for Educators this is max size of image at 200 dpi; the sil is low res and for the comp only. if approved, needs to be redone carefully American Federation of Arts Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from The British Museum Resource for Educators American Federation of Arts © 2006 American Federation of Arts Temples and Tombs: Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum is organized by the American Federation of Arts and The British Museum. All materials included in this resource may be reproduced for educational American Federation of Arts purposes. 212.988.7700 800.232.0270 The AFA is a nonprofit institution that organizes art exhibitions for presen- www.afaweb.org tation in museums around the world, publishes exhibition catalogues, and interim address: develops education programs. 122 East 42nd Street, Suite 1514 New York, NY 10168 after April 1, 2007: 305 East 47th Street New York, NY 10017 Please direct questions about this resource to: Suzanne Elder Burke Director of Education American Federation of Arts 212.988.7700 x26 [email protected] Exhibition Itinerary to Date Oklahoma City Museum of Art Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 7–November 26, 2006 The Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens Jacksonville, Florida December 22, 2006–March 18, 2007 North Carolina Museum of Art Raleigh, North Carolina April 15–July 8, 2007 Albuquerque Museum of Art and History Albuquerque, New Mexico November 16, 2007–February 10, 2008 Fresno Metropolitan Museum of Art, History and Science Fresno, California March 7–June 1, 2008 Design/Production: Susan E.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Eternity: Tomb of Nefertari
    - - - OUSE OF ETERNITY The Tomb of Nefertari John K. McDonald The Getty Conservation Institute and the J. Paul Getty Museum Los Angeles Cover/title page: Detail a/Queen Nefertari 0/'1 the north wall of Chamber G. All photographs are by Guillermo Aldana unless credited otherwise. The Getty Conservation Institute works internationally to further the appreciation and preservation of the world's cultural heritage for the enrichment and use of present and future generations. This is the first volume in the Conservation and Cultural Heritage series, which aims to provide in a popular format information about selected culturally significant sites throughout the world. © 1996 The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in Singapore Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McDonald. John K. House of eternity: the tomb of Nefertari I John K. McDonald. p. cm. ISBN 0-89236-415-7 1. Nefertari. Queen. consort of Rameses II. King of Egypt-Tomb. 2. Mural painting and decoration. Egyptian. 3. Tombs-Egypt. 4. Valley of the Queens (Egypt) I. Title. DT73· v34M35 1996 932-dc20 96-24123 C1P Contents Foreword 5 Introduction Dynasties of Ancient Egypt II Nefertari: Radiant Queen A Letter from Nefertari The Queen's Titles and Epithets 19 The Valley of the Queens Ernesto Schiaparelli 25 Conveyance to Eternal Life: The Royal Tombs of Egypt Tomb Paints and Materials 33 The Tomb Builders' Village 37 After Nefertari's Burial 41 Resurrection and Recurrent Risks 47 The King of the Dead and His Divine Family Divine Guidance 55 Among the Immortals: A Walk through the "House of Eternity" The Texts in the Tomb III Conclusion 116 Acknowledgments II HOUSE OF ETER ITY an honored and < > beloved queen, still in the prime of earthly existence, set off upon a voyage to the netherworld, in quest of eternal life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Dieties
    Ancient Egyptian Dieties Amun: When Amun’s city, Thebes, rose to power in the New Kingdom (1539-1070 B.C.), Amun became known as the “King of the Gods.” He was worshipped as the high god throughout Egypt. Able to take many shapes, Amun was sometimes shown as a ram or goose, but was usually shown in human form. He is fundamentally a Creator God and his name, Amun, means “The Hidden One.” Amun-Re: Originating in the Middle Kingdom, (2055 - 1650 B.C.), Amun-Re is a fusion of the Gods Amun and Re. He combined the invisible power of creation and the power visible in heat and light. Anubis: Usually represented as a black jackal, or as a human with a canine head, Anubis was a guardian of mummies, tombs, and cemeteries, as well as an escort of the deceased to the afterlife. Atum: According to the most ancient Egyptian creation myths, Atum is the creator of the world. He also brought the first gods Shu (air), Tefnut (water), Geb (earth), and Nut (sky) to Egypt. He is also god of the setting sun. Atum was represented in many forms such as a human, a human with the head of a ram, and a combination of an eel and a cobra. Bastet: Originating as early as Dynasty II (2820-2670 B.C.), Bastet was represented as a cat or a woman with a lioness’s head. She eventually became Egypt’s most important “cat goddess.” If Bastet took the form of a cat she was considered content, but if Bastet was a lioness she was considered an angry goddess.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crown of the Divine Child in the Meroitic Kingdom. a Typological Study 1
    ANNALS OF THE NÁPRSTEK MUSEUM 37/1 • 2016 • (pp. 17–31) THE CROWN OF THE DIVINE CHILD IN THE MEROITIC KINGDOM. A TYPOLOGICAL STUDY 1 Eric Spindler2 ABSTRACT: The crown of the divine child was one of the headdresses that transferred from Egypt to the Meroitic Kingdom. It was integrated in the Egyptian decoration program in the early Ptolemaic time. The first king of Meroe to use this crown in the decoration of the Lion Temple in Musawwarat es-Sufra was Arnekhamani (235–218 BCE). It also appeared later in the sanctuaries of his successors Arkamani II (218– 200 BCE) and Adikhalamani (ca. 200–190 BCE) in Dakka and Debod. The Egyptians presented it as the headdress of child gods or the king. In the Kingdom of Meroe the crown was more like a tool to depict the fully legitimised king before he faced the main deity of the sanctuary. To show this the Meroitic artists changed its iconography in such a way that the primarily Egyptian focus on the aspects of youth and rebirth withdrew into the background so that the elements of cosmic, royal and divine legitimacy became the centre of attention. Even if the usage and parts of the iconography were different, the overall meaning remained the same. It was a headdress that combined all elements of the cosmos as well as of royal and divine power. KEY WORDS: Crowns – divine child – Meroitic culture – Dakka – Debod – Musawwarat es-Sufra Introduction The beginning of the third century BCE witnessed a marked change in political relations between Egypt and its southern neighbour – Nubia (for a more specified overview of this topic see: Török 1997: 424-432; Welsby 1996: 66-67).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Hypostyle Hall in the Temple of Amun at Karnak
    The Great Hypostyle Hall in the Temple of Amun at Karnak. Volume 1, Part 2 (Translation and Commentary) and Part 3 (Figures and Plates) ISBN: 9781614910275 (hb) by Peter J. Brand, Rosa Erika Feleg and William J. Murnane PRICE: DESCRIPTION: $99.95 (hb) Standing at the heart of Karnak Temple, the Great Hypostyle Hall is a forest of 134 giant sandstone columns enclosed by massive walls. Sety I built the Great Hypostyle Hall ca. 1300 BCE and PUBLICATION DATE: decorated the northern wing with exquisite bas reliefs. After his death, his successor Ramesses II 12 March 2019 (hb) completed the southern wing mostly in sunk relief. This volume provides full translation, epigraphic analysis, and photographic documentation of the elaborate wall reliefs inside the Hall. This vast trove BINDING: of ritual art and texts attest to the richness and vitality of Egyptian civilization at the height of its Hardback imperial power. The present volume builds upon and serves as a companion to an earlier volume of drawings of the wall scenes made by Harold H. Nelson in the 1950s and edited for publication by SIZE: William J. Murnane in 1981. 9 x11 TABLE OF CONTENTS: PAGES: Table of Contents, part 2 (translation and commentary) 800 List of Symbols and Abbreviations List of Plans ILLUSTRATIONS: Preface 373 figures, 265 plates and Acknowledgments 15 plans 1. Constructing and Decorating the Great Hypostyle Hall 2. The Character and Chronology of the Relief Decoration of Sety I and Ramesses II in the Great PUBLISHER: Hypostyle Hall Oriental Institute of the 3. General Characteristics of Nelson's Drawings University of Chicago 4.
    [Show full text]
  • French-Egyptian Centre for the Study of the Temples of Karnak
    FRENCH-EGYPTIAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF THE TEMPLES OF KARNAK Luxor, 2017 Ministry of Antiquities of Egypt Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Ministère des Affaires Étrangères et du Développement International FRENCH-EGYPTIAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF THE TEMPLES OF KARNAK ACTIVITY REPORT 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMES ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. Power and marks of Power at Karnak ........................................................................................ 7 1.1.1. The Sphinx of Pinudjem ............................................................................................................. 7 1.1.2. The 8th Pylon ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2. Peripheral areas ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.1. The Temple of Ptah ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Cults and places of worship .......................................................................................................... 28 1.3.1. The Monuments of Amenhotep I ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a TEI Compliant Interchange Format for Ancient Egyptian-Coptic Textual Resources N Ancient Egyptian-Coptic + N One Language – Three+ Writing Systems
    Laurent Coulon (EPHE – Paris) + Frederik Elwert (CERES – Bochum) *Emmanuelle Morlock (HiSoMA – CNRS) *Stéphane Polis (F.R.S.-FNRS – Liège) *Vincent Razanajao (ULg - Liège) Serge Rosmorduc (CNAM – Paris) Simon Schweitzer (BBAW – Berlin) Daniel A. Werning (EXC Topoi – Berlin) * Attending the TEI conference 2015 Towards a TEI compliant interchange format for Ancient Egyptian-Coptic textual resources n Ancient Egyptian-Coptic + n One language – Three+ writing systems n The projects involved n Thesaurus Lingua Aegyptiae n The Ramses Project n “Base de données Cachette de Karnak” n SeNeReko n Rubensohn n Different goals – similar issues Outline of the talk n Focus on the witness n Complexity of the text-bearing documents n The relationship between objects / documents / witnesses / texts n Towards a TEI interchange format n Methodology n Proposal and problems n Conclusions n Results and future developments + Ancient Egyptian - Coptic Background information + Ancient Egyptian - Coptic n One language - 3000 - 2000 - 1000 0 1000 + Ancient Egyptian - Coptic n One language – ‘Three’ writing systems - 3000 - 2000 - 1000 0 1000 Hieroglyphic Hieratic Demotic Coptic + Ancient Egyptian - Coptic n One language – ‘Three’ writing systems - 3000 - 2000 - 1000 0 1000 + Ancient Egyptian - Coptic n One language – ‘Three’ writing systems - 3000 0 1000 wsr-mȝʿ.t-rʿ-mry-Jmn <-N5-F12-C10-i-mn:n:N36-> + Ancient Egyptian - Coptic n One language – ‘Three’ writing systems - 3000 0 1000 wsr-mȝʿ.t-rʿ-mry-Jmn <-N5-F12-C10-i-mn:n:N36-> Ḥri-šri sȝ i[mn-nḫt] G5&G37-A1:G39-i
    [Show full text]
  • A Nome Procession from the Royal Cult Complex in the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir El-Bahari 20 O B
    INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXVII 2014 O B A Nome Procession from the Royal Cult Complex in the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari 20 O B The term ‘nome procession’ refers to an iconographic sequence of nome personifi cations depicted mostly on the lowest level of temples or shrines. The fi gures are usually represented in a procession around the edifi ce, bringing offerings for the cult of the deity or the king worshiped inside. They follow the geographic order from south to north, in line with the traditional Egyptian system of orientation which gives precedence to the southern direction.1 The present study deals with one such procession of nome personifi cations represented in the Temple of Queen Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari. The scene in question covers the eastern wall of a small, open courtyard in the Complex of the Royal Cult situated south of the main Upper Courtyard of the Temple. The small court precedes two vestibules which further lead to adjacent two cult chapels. The bigger vestibule, belonging to the Chapel of Hatshepsut, is attached to the southern side of the courtyard, whereas on the western side of the latter lie the second, much smaller vestibule and a cult chapel dedicated to the Queen’s father, Tuthmosis I. From the architectural point of view, the eastern wall of the small courtyard partly delimits the Royal Cult Complex from the east. Iconographically, the whole eastern wall of the Complex is divided into two sections, each one belonging to a different piece of this cultic compound: the northern part, decorated in sunken relief, stretches for 3.71m (which equals 7 cubits) and belongs to the said small courtyard; the southern section – 5.81m long (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Palace of Ma'at
    Palace of Ma’at Originally built by Hatshepsut - 1479 BCE to 1458 BCE Modified by Thutmose III - 1479 BCE to 1425 BCE Other works initiated by Hatshepsut: Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, 8th Pylon, Amenhotep I Calcite Chapel, Obelisks at Contra Temple, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall, Wadjet Hall, Red Chapel, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II Other works initiated by Thutmose III: Akhmenu, Contra Temple, Wadjet Hall, 7th Pylon, Thutmose III Shrine, Enclosures and Gates, Sacred Lake, 6th Pylon and Court, 5th Pylon and Court, Obelisks of 7th Pylon, Station of the King and Corridor, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Central Bark Shrine, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II, East Exterior Wall Other shrines: Amenhotep I Calcite Chapel, Amenhotep II Shrine, Contra Temple, Osiris Catacombs, Osiris Coptite, Osiris Heqa-Djet, Central Bark Shrine, Ramesses II Eastern Temple, Ramesses III Temple, Red Chapel, Sety II Shrine, Taharqo Kiosk, Thutmose III Shrine, White Chapel, Edifice of Amenhotep II, Chapel of Hakoris, Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel, Station of the King and Corridor Introduction The “palace of Ma’at” served as the central sanctuary of Karnak. It was located within the Thutmoside core of the temple and protected the successive central bark shrines of Hatshepsut, Thutmose III, and Philip Arrhideaus. The rectangular structure was comprised of a series of small rooms with a large central hall for the placement of the central bark. The walls of the palace were covered with carved and brightly painted relief scenes of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III. Measurements: The palace of Ma’at measures approximately 40m across by 20m deep.
    [Show full text]