DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Management Plan for Sabine National Wildlife Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Management Plan for Sabine National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SABINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Cameron Parish, Louisiana Southeast Region Sabine National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region March 2013 Table Of Contents HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Scope and Rationale .......................................................................................................... 5 B. Refuge Purpose ................................................................................................................. 6 C. Legal Mandates ................................................................................................................. 6 C-1: Establishment of the Refuge .............................................................................. 6 C-2: Federal Laws, Mandates, and Policies ............................................................... 7 D. Relationship to Other Plans .............................................................................................. 7 D-1: National and Regional Plans ............................................................................. 8 D-2: Local and State Plans ..................................................................................... 11 II. Environmental Setting and Background .................................................................................. 15 A. Location ..................................................................................................................... 15 B. Management Compartments and Descriptions .......................................................... 15 C. Physical and Geographic Setting ............................................................................... 19 C-1: Climate ........................................................................................................... 19 C-2: Temperature ................................................................................................... 19 C-3: Precipitation ................................................................................................... 19 C-4: Atmospheric Moisture ..................................................................................... 19 C-5: Lightning ........................................................................................................ 20 C-6: Tropical Cyclones ........................................................................................... 20 C-7: Air Quality ....................................................................................................... 21 C-8: Geomorphology and Topography ................................................................... 21 C-9: Hydrology ....................................................................................................... 22 C-10: Soils .............................................................................................................. 22 C-11: Changing Environmental Conditions .............................................................. 27 C-12: Flyways ......................................................................................................... 27 D. Cultural and Refuge Land History .............................................................................. 30 D-1: Prehistoric Human Occupation .......................................................................... 30 D-2: Historic Human Occupation ............................................................................... 30 D-3: Recent History ................................................................................................... 31 D-4: Prehistoric Habitat Conditions ........................................................................... 31 Table of Contents i D-5: Historic Habitat Conditions ................................................................................31 D-6: Current Habitat Conditions ................................................................................33 D-7: Changes in Habitat Conditions ..........................................................................35 D-8: Climate Change .................................................................................................38 D-9: Habitat Restoration ...........................................................................................41 III. Resources of Concern .............................................................................................................. 49 A. Identification of Refuge Resources of Concern ...........................................................49 A-1: Waterfowl ........................................................................................................49 A-2: Marsh Birds .....................................................................................................51 A-3: Fisheries ..........................................................................................................52 A-4: Species with Complementary Habitat Requirements ........................................52 B. Habitat Requirements of Resources of Concern .........................................................57 B-1: Waterfowl ..........................................................................................................57 B-2: Mottled Duck .....................................................................................................58 B-3: Marsh Birds .......................................................................................................59 B-4: Fisheries ...........................................................................................................60 C. Refuge Contribution to Habitat for Resources of Concern ..........................................60 IV. Habitat Management Goals and Objectives ............................................................................ 66 A. Coastal Marsh Habitat Goal ........................................................................................66 Objective A-1: Impounded Freshwater Marsh Habitat ................................................66 Objective A-2: Unimpounded Marsh Habitat ..............................................................68 Objective A-3: Unimpounded Marsh Habitat Restoration ...........................................69 B. Native Prairie Habitat Goal .........................................................................................70 Objective B-1: Native Prairie ......................................................................................70 C. Aquatic Habitat Goal ...................................................................................................71 Objective C-1: Oligohaline Aquatic Habitat ................................................................71 V. Habitat Management Strategies ............................................................................ 74 A. Impounded Marsh Habitat Strategies .........................................................................74 B. Unimpounded Marsh Strategies .................................................................................76 C. Undesirable Flora Strategies ......................................................................................77 D. Undesirable Fauna Strategies ....................................................................................78 E. Prescribed Fire Strategies ..........................................................................................79 ii Sabine National Wildlife Refuge APPENDICES Appendix A. Literature Cited ......................................................................................................... 82 Appendix B. Authors and Contributors ........................................................................................ 93 Appendix C. Refuge Biota ............................................................................................................. 95 Plants .................................................................................................................................... 95 Animals ............................................................................................................................... 105 Appendix D. Threatened and Endangered Species of Cameron Parish, Louisiana ................ 136 Appendix E. Climate Change Impacts ........................................................................................ 137 Appendix F. Oil and Gas Production on Sabine NWR ............................................................... 139 Oil And Gas Activities .......................................................................................................... 139 General Information ................................................................................................. 139 Wildfires ................................................................................................................... 142 Appendix G. Fish and Wildlife Service Environmental Action Statement for Categorical Exclusion ................................................................................................................ 147 Table of Contents iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of Sabine NWR within the Southwest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas: Upper Coast Cumulative Bird List Column A: Number of Tours (Out of 16) on Which Species Seen Column B: Number of Days Th
    Texas: Upper Coast Cumulative Bird List Column A: Number of tours (out of 16) on which species seen Column B: number of days this species was seen on the 2019 tour Column C: maximum daily count for this species on the 2019 tour Column D: E = endemic; H = Heard only A B C D 16 Black-bellied Whistling -Duck 5 30 Dendrocygna autumnalis 15 Fulvous Whistling-Duck 4 200 Dendrocygna bicolor 1 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons 5 Snow Goose Chen caerulescens 11 Wood Duck 1 2 Aix sponsa 12 Gadwall 2 40 Anas strepera 10 American Wigeon Anas americana 7 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 16 Mottled Duck 4 20 Anas fulvigula maculosa 16 Blue-winged Teal 5 150 Anas discors 2 Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera 15 Northern Shoveler 2 3 Anas clypeata 2 Northern Pintail Anas acuta 7 Green-winged Teal 1 3 Anas crecca 12 Lesser Scaup 2 12 Aythya affinis 1 Ring-necked Duck 1 1 Aythya collaris 1 King Eider Somateria spectabilis 3 Surf Scoter Melanitta perspicillata 2 Black Scoter 1 2 Melanitta nigra 1 Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis 13 Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator 2 Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis 7 Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus 1 Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo 15 Pied-billed Grebe 3 20 Podilymbus podiceps 2 Eared Grebe Podiceps nigricollis 16 Rock Pigeon 5 25 Columba livia 16 Eurasian Collared-Dove 3 10 Streptopelia decaocto 16 White-winged Dove 5 10 Zenaida asiatica 16 Mourning Dove 6 6 Zenaida macroura ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 29 Volume 13, December 2013 A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE MARY K. OXLEY NATURE CENTER, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Amy K. Buthod Oklahoma Biological Survey Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Robert Bebb Herbarium University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019-0575 (405) 325-4034 Email: [email protected] Keywords: flora, exotics, inventory ABSTRACT This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A total of 342 taxa from 75 families and 237 genera were collected from four main vegetation types. The families Asteraceae and Poaceae were the largest, with 49 and 42 taxa, respectively. Fifty-eight exotic taxa were found, representing 17% of the total flora. Twelve taxa tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION clayey sediment (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1977). Climate is Subtropical The objective of this study was to Humid, and summers are humid and warm inventory the vascular plants of the Mary K. with a mean July temperature of 27.5° C Oxley Nature Center (ONC) and to prepare (81.5° F). Winters are mild and short with a a list and voucher specimens for Oxley mean January temperature of 1.5° C personnel to use in education and outreach. (34.7° F) (Trewartha 1968). Mean annual Located within the 1,165.0 ha (2878 ac) precipitation is 106.5 cm (41.929 in), with Mohawk Park in northwestern Tulsa most occurring in the spring and fall County (ONC headquarters located at (Oklahoma Climatological Survey 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lac Bay: Then and Now… a Historical Interpretation of Environmental Change During the 1900S
    Lac Bay: Then and Now… A Historical Interpretation of Environmental Change During the 1900s A Site Characterization of Lac Bay for Resource Managers and Naturalists prepared for Bonaire Marine Park by Environics, N.V. Cynthia E. Lott, Environmental Consultant Final Edition October 2001 Lac Bay Then and Now A Historical Interpretation of Environmental Change During the 1900s A Site Characterization of Lac Bay For Resource Managers and Naturalists By Cynthia E. Lott Environmental Consultant Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles Final Edition October 2001 Copyright 2001 All rights reserved Title Page Map Credits: Top: Year 1866, Year 1911 (Hummelinck en Roos 1969); Middle: Year 1949, Year 1967 (Hummelinck en Roos 1969); Bottom left: Year 1961 (Hummelinck en Roos 1969); Bottom right: Year 1998 (Wing Group, N.V. 1998/Dec.) This Work is dedicated… In the fondest memory of My beloved friend, Dick Harrison, who encouraged me to believe in myself. God Bless Us Every One…. Lac Bay: Then and Now…A Historical Interpretation of Environmental Change During the 1900s A Site Characterization for Resource Managers and Naturalists Foreword by Boi Antoin, Editor of EXTRA, Bonaire's Daily Newspaper, and respected local historian LAC No tin duda ku Lac ta un sitio, un bahia, ku nos mester trata na protehá i konservá na tur manera. E historia, kultura i naturalesa di Lac hamas por bai pèrdí. Asina importante e lugá aki tabata I ta pa Boneiru. Despues di investigashonnan arkeológiko i ekológiko ku a tuma lugá di Lac, tabata nesesario, na mi konsepto, pa a bini ku un investigashon mas profundo i sientífiko di e área bunita aki.
    [Show full text]
  • Diurnal Changes in Structure and Function of the Compound Eye of Ligia Exotica (Crustacea, Isopoda)
    J. exp. Biol, 123, 1-26 (1986) \ Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1986 DIURNAL CHANGES IN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF THE COMPOUND EYE OF LIGIA EXOTICA (CRUSTACEA, ISOPODA) BY TAKAHIKO HARIYAMA Research Centre for Applied Information Science, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-chome, Sendai 980, Japan V. BENNO MEYER-ROCHDW Department of Biological Sciences, University ofWaikato, Hamilton (Private Bag), New Zealand AND EISUKE EGUCHI Department of Biology, Yokohama City University, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236, Japan Accepted 28 February 1986 SUMMARY The ultrastructure of the retinula cells of Ligia exotica changes diurnally and in response to light/dark adaptation. At the low phase of electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude (at noon), the arrangement of microvilli is ordered and the rhabdom is of the open type. An irregular arrangement of microvilli appears at the high phase of ERG amplitude (at midnight), when the rhabdom is of the closed type. The pigment granules disperse at midnight and assemble at noon. A centrally positioned, spike- producing eccentric cell is present in each ommatidium. Spectral response curves based on ERG measurements have two maxima, one to light of 383 nm wavelength, the other at around 520 nm. These two peaks represent the two classes of receptor cells identified by intracellular recordings. The ERG responses to light of 383 nm and 520 nm wavelengths display a diurnal rhythmicity, being high at night and low during the day. However, the responses to green light are more strongly affected than those to ultraviolet light. Consequently, the eye displays a relatively higher ultraviolet-sensitivity during the day, whereas at night sensitivity to green light is increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae Pollen from Southern Brazil: Distinguishing Grasslands (Campos) from Forests by Analyzing a Diverse Range of Poaceae Species
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 06 December 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01833 Poaceae Pollen from Southern Brazil: Distinguishing Grasslands (Campos) from Forests by Analyzing a Diverse Range of Poaceae Species Jefferson N. Radaeski 1, 2, Soraia G. Bauermann 2* and Antonio B. Pereira 1 1 Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, Brazil, 2 Laboratório de Palinologia da Universidade Luterana do Brasil–ULBRA, Universidade Luterana do Brazil, Canoas, Brazil This aim of this study was to distinguish grasslands from forests in southern Brazil by analyzing Poaceae pollen grains. Through light microscopy analysis, we measured the size of the pollen grain, pore, and annulus from 68 species of Rio Grande do Sul. Measurements were recorded of 10 forest species and 58 grassland species, representing all tribes of the Poaceae in Rio Grande do Sul. We measured the polar, equatorial, pore, and annulus diameter. Results of statistical tests showed that arboreous forest species have larger pollen grain sizes than grassland and herbaceous forest species, and in particular there are strongly significant differences between arboreous and grassland species. Discriminant analysis identified three distinct groups representing Edited by: each vegetation type. Through the pollen measurements we established three pollen Encarni Montoya, types: larger grains (>46 µm), from the Bambuseae pollen type, medium-sized grains Institute of Earth Sciences Jaume < Almera (CSIC), Spain (46–22 µm), from herbaceous pollen type, and small grains ( 22 µm), from grassland Reviewed by: pollen type. The results of our compiled Poaceae pollen dataset may be applied to the José Tasso Felix Guimarães, fossil pollen of Quaternary sediments. Vale Institute of Technology, Brazil Lisa Schüler-Goldbach, Keywords: pollen morphology, grasses, pampa, South America, Atlantic forest, bamboo pollen Göttingen University, Germany *Correspondence: Jefferson N.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Classification and Nomenclature by Norbert Leist and Andrea Jonitz Prof
    ISTA Purity Seminar 15. June 2009 Zürich TlTools for seed identifi cati on species classification and nomenclature by Norbert Leist and Andrea Jonitz Prof. Dr. Norbert Leist Dr. Andrea Jonitz Brahmsstr.25 LTZ Augustenberg 76669 Bad Schönborn Neßlerstr.23 Germany 76227 Karlsruhe [email protected] Germany [email protected] Aquilegia vulgaris, Variation Variation • Variation is everywhere in biological systems. Natural variation at the population level is usualy not continuous, but occurs in discrete units or taxa. Easily the most important taxonomic level is the species because it is often the smallest clearly recognizable and discrete set of populations. • Understanding how species form and how to recognize them have been major challenges to systematists. The variation in one population becomes interrupted, the way to a split into two species strong hairy nearly glabrous Variation on species • Sources of variation: MttiMutation Recombination Independent assortment of the chromosomes Random genetic drift Selection Conservation of species characteristics avoiding gene flow Isolating barriers: temporal (seasonal, diurnal) habitat (wet, dry; calceous, silicious) floral (structural, behavioral eg. adaptations for pollinators) reproductive mode (self fertilisation, agamospery) incompatibility (pollen, seeds) hybrid inviability hybrid floral isolation hybrid sterility hybrid break down Iris germanica Iris sibirica Isolation by habitat Definition of „species“ is not easy A species is the smallest aggregation of populations
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Variation in Community Structure and Recruitment of Benthic Decapods in a Sub-Tidal Cobble Habitat
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 206: 181–191, 2000 Published November 3 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Seasonal variation in community structure and recruitment of benthic decapods in a sub-tidal cobble habitat Martin Robinson*, Oliver Tully Department of Zoology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland ABSTRACT: Quantitative suction samples of benthic decapod fauna were taken in the south of Ireland during 1997. Some species settled into the area, but failed to persist to the first winter, while others were present in high numbers throughout the year. The duration of settlement was species- specific, ranging from several weeks to several months. Body size at settlement decreased with increasing temperature during larval development. Growth potential and early mortality of a number of decapod species was examined by separation of successive moult instars from length-frequency distributions. Seasonal lows in abundance and biomass of young of the year and for previously estab- lished decapod individuals were identified at the end of July and early August, which may represent the most suitable time to release juveniles for stock-enhancement purposes. Community structure differed between settlement season and over-wintering periods. Young-of-the-year community structure differed from that of previously established individuals, with higher abundance and num- ber of species recorded for the former. The data represent a baseline study of a widely distributed community and may support further work on species interactions, improving the accuracy of predic- tion of annual recruitment fluctuations. KEY WORDS: Community · Decapod · Recruitment · Seasonal variation Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION strong 1995, Pile et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutria Nuisance in Maryland in This Issue: and the Search for Solutions Upcoming Conferences by Dixie L
    ANS Aquatic Nuisance Species Volume 4 No. 3 August 2001 FRESHWATER DIGEST FOUNDATION Providing current information on monitoring and controlling the spread of harmful nonindigenous species. Predicting Future Aquatic Invaders; the Case of Dikerogammarus villosus By Jaimie T.A. Dick and Dirk Platvoet he accumulation of case studies of invasions has led to for- mulations of general ‘predictors’ that can help us identify Tpotential future invaders. Coupled with experimental stud- ies, assessments may allow us to predict the ecological impacts of potential new invaders. We used these approaches to identify a future invader of North American fresh and brackish waters, the amphipod crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus. Why Identify D. villosus as Invasive? Dikerogammarus villosus (see Figure 1) originates from an invasion donor “hot spot”, the Ponto-Caspian region, which com- prises the Black, Caspian, and Azov Seas’ basins (Nesemann et al. 1995; Ricciardi & Rasmussen 1998; van der Velde et al. 2000). This species has already invaded western Europe, has moved through the Main-Danube canal, which was formally opened in 1992 (Tittizer 1996), and appeared in the River Rhine at the German/Dutch border in 1994-5 (bij de Vaate & Klink 1995). D. villosus is currently sweeping through Dutch waters (Dick & Platvoet 2000) and has Dikerogammarus villosus continued on page 26 Figure 1. Dikerogammarus villosus Photograph by Ivan Ewart The Nutria Nuisance in Maryland In This Issue: and the Search for Solutions Upcoming Conferences By Dixie L. Bounds, Theodore A. Mollett, and Mark H. Sherfy and Meetings . 27 utria, Myocastor coypus, is an invasive lished in 15 states nationwide, all reporting Nuisance Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrones De Distribución De La Flora Vascular Acuática Estricta En El
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 79: 435- 448, 2008 Patrones de distribución de la fl ora vascular acuática estricta en el estado de Tamaulipas, México Distributional patterns of the strictly aquatic vascular fl ora in the state of Tamaulipas, Mexico Arturo Mora-Olivo1*, José Luis Villaseñor2, Isolda Luna-Vega3 y Juan J. Morrone4 1Instituto de Ecología y Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, 13 Blvd. Adolfo López Mateos 928, Ciudad Victoria 87040, Tamaulipas, México. 2Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D. F., México. 3Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Apartado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D.F., México. 4Museo de Zoología “Alfonso L. Herrera”, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D. F., México. *Correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen. Se analizaron los patrones de riqueza y distribución de las plantas vasculares acuáticas estrictas en el estado de Tamaulipas, México. Se registraron 93 especies, 62 de las cuales son típicas de ambientes lénticos. La subcuenca Río Tamesí fue la que registró el mayor número de especies (68, 73.1%). No se registraron especies endémicas del estado, aunque existen 2 especies restringidas al territorio mexicano (Lobelia purpusii y Oserya coulteriana). Se consideran como raras 29 especies (31.2%) por presentarse en una sola subcuenca y sólo 2 especies están distribuidas ampliamente en la mayoría de éstas (Bacopa monnieri y Echinodorus berteroi). Un análisis de parsimonia de endemismos (PAE) de las subcuencas hidrológicas del estado con base en la presencia compartida de especies reveló que las plantas acuáticas estrictas presentan un patrón de distribución anidado.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]