340 United Nations Treaty Series 1954-1955

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

340 United Nations Treaty Series 1954-1955 340 United Nations Treaty Series 1954-1955 No. 2220. UNIVERSAL POSTAL CONVENTION (WITH FINAL PROTOCOL, DETAILED REGULATIONS AND PROVISIONS CONCERNING AIR MAIL CORRESPONDENCE, WITH FINAL PROTOCOL). SIGNED AT BRUSSELS, ON 11 JULY 19521 RATIFICATIONS Instruments of ratification by the following States were deposited with the Government of Belgium on the dates indicated: AUSTRALIA (including Nauru, New Guinea, Papua and Norfolk Island) ....................... 3 May 1954 AUSTRIA ........................ 9 March 1954 BULGARIA ........................ 2 October 1954 CUBA .......................... 14 April 1954 FRANCE (including Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia and all the French Overseas Territories and the territories administered as such) 25 June 1954 GREECE ........................ 5 April 1954 HUNGARY ........................ 3 September 1954 IRELAND ........................ 26 May 1954 MEXICO ......................... 4 October 1954 NETHERLANDS (including Netherlands Antilles, New Guinea and Surinam) ...................... 29 April 1954 ROMANIA ........................ 27 September 1954 UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND (including Isle of Man and Channel Islands) ....... 1 March 1954 Notification extending the application of the Convention to the following territories for the conduct of whose foreign relations the United Kingdom is responsible ....... 19 March 1954 Aden Bahamas Barbados Bechuanaland Bermuda North Borneo (including Labuan) Brunei Cyprus Gold Coast [Colony, Ashanti, Northern Territories, Togoland (under U.K. administration)] Falkland Islands (Colony and dependencies comprising South Georgia, South Orkneys, South Shetlands, South Sandwich Islands and Graham Land) Fiji (including Pitcairn) 1 United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 169, p. 3, and Vol. 186, p. 356. 342 United Nations Treaty Series 1954-1955 Gambia Gibraltar British Guiana British Honduras Hong Kong Jamaica (including Turks and Caicos Islands and the Cayman Islands) Kenya (Colony and Protectorate) Isle of Man (1 March 1954) Channel Islands (l March 1954) Windward Islands (Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia, St. Vincent) Leeward Islands (Antigua, Montserrat, St. Kitts, Nevis and Anguilla, Virgin Islands) Federation of Malaya (Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Malacca, Negri, Sembilan, Pahang, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Selangor, Trengganu) Malta Mauritius Nigeria (Colony, Protectorate, Cameroons under United Kingdom Trusteeship) Uganda Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland (Southern Rhodesia, Protectorate of Northern Rhodesia, Protectorate of Nyasaland) St. Helena (including the islands of Ascension and Tristan da Cunha) Sarawak Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore [including Christmas and Cocos (Keeling) Islands] Somaliland Protectorate Tanganyika (under United Kingdom Trusteeship) Western Pacific High Commission Territories : British Solomon Islands Protectorate, Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony, Central and Southern Line Islands, New Hebrides (Anglo-French condominium) Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Zanzibar Protectorate Certified statement relating to the above-mentioned ratifications was registered by Belgium on 26 January 1955. No. 2020 1954-1955 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 343 Gambie Gibraltar Guyane britannique Honduras britannique Hong-kong Jamaïque (y compris les îles Turks et Caïcos et les îles Cayman) Kenya (colonie et protectorat) Ile de Man (1er mars 1954) Iles Anglo-Normandes (1er mars 1954) Iles du Vent (Dominique, Grenade, Sainte-Lucie, Saint-Vincent) Iles sous le Vent (Antigoa, Montserrat, Saint-Christophe, Névis et Anguilla, îles Vierges) Malaisie (Fédération de) : Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Malacca, Negri, Sembilan, Pahang, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Selangor, Trengganu Malte Maurice Nigeria (colonie, protectorat, Cameroun) Ouganda Rhodésie et Nyassaland (Fédération de) : Rhodésie du Sud, protectorat de la Rhodésie du Nord, protectorat du Nyassaland Sainte-Hélène (y compris l'île de l'Ascension et Tristan da Cunha) Sarawak Seychelles Sierra-Leone Singapour [y compris les îles Christmas et Cocos (Keeling)] Somalie Tanganyika Territoires de la Haute Commission du Pacifique occidental : protectorat britannique des îles Salomon, colonie des îles Gilbert et Ellice, îles Centrales et Méridionales de l'Equateur, Nouvelles-Hébrides (condominium anglo-français) Tonga Trinité et Tobago Zanzibar (protectorat) La déclaration certifiée relative aux ratifications susmentionnées a été enregistrée par la Belgique le 26 janvier 1955. N» 2220.
Recommended publications
  • Survey of British Colonial Development Policy
    No. E 68-A RESTRICTED r:;: ONE '\f ..- tf\rhi.§..l report is restricted to use within the Bank Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Public Disclosure Authorized SURVEY OF BRITISH COLONIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY November 9. 1949 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economic Department Prepared by: B. King TABLE OF CONTE.t-J'TS Page No. I. PREFACE (and Map) • • • • • • • • • t • • .. .. i II. SPi!IMARY • • •••• .. .. ., . , . · .. iv , . III. THE COLONIES UP TO 1940' •• .. .. .. .. • • • 1 TJi.BLES I '& II • .'. .. • • • • • • • • 8 . IV. THE COLONIES SINCE, 1940 ••• • • • • • • • • 10 TABlES III to VI • • • 0 • • • • • • • • 29 APPElIIDIX - THE CURRENCY SYSTEMS OF' THE cOtOlUAL EI'!PlRE .....,,,.,. 34 (i) I. PREFACE The British Colonial :empire is a sO!!lm-:hat loose expression embracing some forty dependencies of the United Kingdom. For the purposes of this paper the term vdll be used to cover all dependencies administered through the Colonial Office on December 31" 1948 cmd" in addition, the three :30uth African High Cowmission territories, which are under the control of the Commonwealth Relations Office. This definition is adopted" since its scope is the same as that of the various Acts of Parliament passed since lSll.~O to Dovcloptx;nt promote colomal development, including the Overseas Resourceshct y::rLcl1 established the Colonial Development Corporation. A full list of the~e ter:-itories 17ill be found in the list following. It [;hould be noted th'lt in conform..i.ty vri th the provisions of the recent Acts vIhieh apply only to flcolonies not possessing responsible govermnent,uYthe definition given above excludes the self-governing colony of Southern :Ehodesia, v(nose rela- tions with the United Kinr;dom are conducted through the Co:nmonlrealth Relations Office.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 10232 MULTILATERAL Agreement Establishing The
    No. 10232 MULTILATERAL Agreement establishing the Caribbean Development Bank (with annexes, Protocol to provide for procedure for amendment of article 36 of the Agreement and Final Act of the Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Caribbean Development Bank). Done at Kingston, Jamaica, on 18 October 1969 Authentic text: English. Registered ex officio on 26 January 1970. MULTILATÉRAL Accord portant création de la Banque de développement des Caraïbes (avec annexes, Protocole établissant la procé dure de modification de l'article 36 de l'Accord et Acte final de la Conférence de plénipotentiaires sur la Ban que de développement des Caraïbes). Fait à Kingston (Jamaïque), le 18 octobre 1969 Texte authentique: anglais. Enregistr d©office le 26 janvier 1970. 218 United Nations Treaty Series 1970 AGREEMENT 1 ESTABLISHING THE CARIBBEAN DEVEL OPMENT BANK The Contracting Parties, CONSCIOUS of the need to accelerate the economic development of States and Territories of the Caribbean and to improve the standards of living of their peoples; RECOGNIZING the resolve of these States and Territories to intensify economic co-operation and promote economic integration in the Caribbean; AWARE of the desire of other countries outside the region to contribute to the economic development of the region; CONSIDERING that such regional economic development urgently requires the mobilization of additional financial and other resources; and CONVINCED that the establishment of a regional financial institution with the broadest possible participation will facilitate
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED L/2167 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 4 March 1964 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution Original: English SUBMISSION BY THE SOUTHERN RHODESIAN GOVERNMENT FOR THE INFORMATION OF CONTRACTING PARTIES Following the dissolution of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland on 31 December 1963 and the resumption by the Southern Rhodesian Government on 1 January 1964 of its former status as a contracting party to the General Agreement, the Southern Rhodesian Government wishes to inform contracting parties that it has adapted to its own use the former Federal customs..and excise legislation and, for its part, is applying on a provisional l>a si s .the terms and provisions of the trade agreements concluded by the former Federal Government with the Governments of the Commonwealth of Australia.,..the Republic of South Africa, the Bechuanaland Protectorate, Swaziland and Basutoland, Canada, Portugal and Japan. The Southern Rhodesian Government would also inform contracting parties that in so far as trade with Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland is concerned its objective has been to disturb 3s little as possible the trading arrangements which existed up to £0, December 1963. Attached at Appendix A^ is a copy of a joint statement issued by the Northern and Southern Rhodesian ftovernments on 31 December 1963 regarding the interim arrangaments relating to trade between the two territories which became effective on 1 January 1964 and which will remain in force until replaced by alternative arrangements. At Appendix Bl is a copy of the Trade Agreement entered into between the Government of Nyasaland and the Government of Southern Rhodesia on 6 January 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • UK and Colonies
    This document was archived on 27 July 2017 UK and Colonies 1. General 1.1 Before 1 January 1949, the principal form of nationality was British subject status, which was obtained by virtue of a connection with a place within the Crown's dominions. On and after this date, the main form of nationality was citizenship of the UK and Colonies, which was obtained by virtue of a connection with a place within the UK and Colonies. 2. Meaning of the expression 2.1 On 1 January 1949, all the territories within the Crown's dominions came within the UK and Colonies except for the Dominions of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Newfoundland, India, Pakistan and Ceylon (see "DOMINIONS") and Southern Rhodesia, which were identified by s.1(3) of the BNA 1948 as independent Commonwealth countries. Section 32(1) of the 1948 Act defined "colony" as excluding any such country. Also excluded from the UK and Colonies was Southern Ireland, although it was not an independent Commonwealth country. 2.2 For the purposes of the BNA 1948, the UK included Northern Ireland and, as of 10 February 1972, the Island of Rockall, but excluded the Channel Islands and Isle of Man which, under s.32(1), were colonies. 2.3 The significance of a territory which came within the UK and Colonies was, of course, that by virtue of a connection with such a territory a person could become a CUKC. Persons who, prior to 1 January 1949, had become British subjects by birth, naturalisation, annexation or descent as a result of a connection with a territory which, on that date, came within the UK and Colonies were automatically re- classified as CUKCs (s.12(1)-(2)).
    [Show full text]
  • Nyasa Clandestine Migration Through Southern Rhodesia Into the Union of South Africa: 1920S – 1950S
    Settling in Motion: Nyasa Clandestine Migration through Southern Rhodesia into the Union of South Africa: 1920s – 1950s Anusa Daimon Centre for Africa Studies University of the Free State Bloemfontein, South Africa Abstract Illegal African migration into South Africa is not uniquely a post-apartheid phenomenon. It has its antecedents in the colonial/apartheid period. The South Africa colonial economy relied heavily on cheap African labour from both within and outside the Union. Most foreign migrant labourers came from the then Nyasaland (Malawi) and Portuguese East Africa (Mozambique) through official channels of the Witwatersrand Native Labour Association (WNLA). WNLA was active throughout the Southern Africa and competed for the same labour resource with other regional supranational ‘native’ labour recruitment agencies, providing various incentives to lure and transport potential employees to its bustling South African gold and diamond mining industry. However, not all migrant labourers found their way through formal WNLA channels. Using archival material from repositories in Harare (Zimbabwe), Zomba (Malawi), Grahamstown (South Africa), London and Oxford (UK), the article casts light on illicit migration mainly by Malawian labourers (Nyasas) through Southern Rhodesia into South Africa between the 1920s and 1950s. It argues that many transient Nyasas subverted the inhibitive WNLA contractual obligations by clandestinely migrating independently into the Union. They also exploited the labour recruitment infrastructure used by the state and labour bureaus to swiftly move across Southern Rhodesia. In essence, Nyasas settled in motion, using Southern Rhodesia as a stepping-stone or springboard en-route to the more lucrative Union of South Africa. An appreciation of such informal migration opens up space for creating a more comprehensive historiography of labour migration in Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List
    Table 1 Comprehensive International Points List FCC ITU-T Country Region Dialing FIPS Comments, including other 1 Code Plan Code names commonly used Abu Dhabi 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aden 5 967 YE include with Yemen Admiralty Islands 7 675 PP include with Papua New Guinea (Bismarck Arch'p'go.) Afars and Assas 1 253 DJ Report as 'Djibouti' Afghanistan 2 93 AF Ajman 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Akrotiri Sovereign Base Area 9 44 AX include with United Kingdom Al Fujayrah 5 971 TC include with United Arab Emirates Aland 9 358 FI Report as 'Finland' Albania 4 355 AL Alderney 9 44 GK Guernsey (Channel Islands) Algeria 1 213 AG Almahrah 5 967 YE include with Yemen Andaman Islands 2 91 IN include with India Andorra 9 376 AN Anegada Islands 3 1 VI include with Virgin Islands, British Angola 1 244 AO Anguilla 3 1 AV Dependent territory of United Kingdom Antarctica 10 672 AY Includes Scott & Casey U.S. bases Antigua 3 1 AC Report as 'Antigua and Barbuda' Antigua and Barbuda 3 1 AC Antipodes Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Argentina 8 54 AR Armenia 4 374 AM Aruba 3 297 AA Part of the Netherlands realm Ascension Island 1 247 SH Ashmore and Cartier Islands 7 61 AT include with Australia Atafu Atoll 7 690 TL include with New Zealand (Tokelau) Auckland Islands 7 64 NZ include with New Zealand Australia 7 61 AS Australian External Territories 7 672 AS include with Australia Austria 9 43 AU Azerbaijan 4 994 AJ Azores 9 351 PO include with Portugal Bahamas, The 3 1 BF Bahrain 5 973 BA Balearic Islands 9 34 SP include
    [Show full text]
  • The Gazette March 1954
    Langston University Digital Commons @ Langston University LU Gazette, 1950-1959 LU Gazette (Student Newspaper) 3-1954 The aG zette March 1954 Langston University Follow this and additional works at: http://dclu.langston.edu/ archives_gazette_newspaper_19501959 Recommended Citation Langston University, "The aG zette March 1954" (1954). LU Gazette, 1950-1959. Book 16. http://dclu.langston.edu/archives_gazette_newspaper_19501959/16 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the LU Gazette (Student Newspaper) at Digital Commons @ Langston University. It has been accepted for inclusion in LU Gazette, 1950-1959 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Langston University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Langston University Gazette VOLUME THREE LANGSTON UNIVERSITY. LANGSTON, OKLAHOMA, MARCH, 1954 NUMBER FOUR Langston University Observes Brotherhood Week During February Adopting the national tlicmc for in year-round activities to build brotherhood, “ Let's (Jet Together," brotherho(Kl," Langston University began its fourth The season was used as an oppor­ annual obscrvancc of the Broiher- tunity to promote understanding of hooil season here I'ehruary 7, ac­ the development of religious faiths cording to an announcenunt from and to loster intcrfaith cooperation the ollice ot |ohn W. C'olcman, uni­ in matters of comon concern, accord­ versity chaphiin and Director of Re­ ing to Mrs. ,\ilella Smith, president ligious activities. ol the .\sociation ot Women Stu­ dents which sponsored the activities The I’ r(JtherhocKl season hail as of the week. .Mrs. Smith added that its purposes: ( i ) "to give people an special efforts were made to build opportunity to re-tledicate themselves appreci.ition for the religious beliefs as individuals to the basic ideals of of others.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION of SURINAM 1920-1970 to Norine VERHANDELINGEN VAN HET KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR T AAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE
    THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF SURINAM 1920-1970 To Norine VERHANDELINGEN VAN HET KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR T AAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE 65 THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF SURINAM 1920 - 1970 A socio-demographic analysis H. E. LAMUR THE HAGUE - MAR TINUS NIJHOFF 1973 I.S.B.N. 90.247.1556.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish first and foremost to record my thanks to Professor W. Steigenga for his constant guidance and encouragement. I am also grateful to him for the freedom he allowed me, both as regards the framework of the investigation and the analysis of the data collected. His critical approach contributed in no small degree to the study being brought to a successful conclusion, and my only hope is that I have succeeded in making fuIl use of his commen tso I also wish to express my gratitude to Professor A. J. F. Köbben for his criticism and valuable suggestions. The data for the study were collected and partially processed by H. A. C. Boldewijn, W. J. Doest, D. P. Kaulesar Sukul, R. 1. Korsten, M. R. Kortram, A. R. Lamur and H. C. Limburg. Their enthusiasm, which never faltered even through the trying periods when the data were being gathered, afforded me great support. I owe them my warm est thanks. I am also grateful to Mr. J. Pinas for his assistance. For permis sion to collect the data for this study 1 wish to thank the District Commissioners, the Heads of the Offices for Population Administration and the Head of the Central Office for Population Administration. When subjecting some of the data to statistical analysis I enlisted the aid of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 ARRL Diamond DXCC Challenge Entity List
    2012 ARRL Diamond DXCC Challenge Entity List (3 Jan, 2012) Country Name in 1937 Entity in 2012, if different Prefix in 1937 Prefix in 2012 Work this in 2012 Work this in 2012 √ Country name in 1937 Entity in 2012, if different Prefix in 1937 Prefix in 2012 ◊ Abyssinia Ethiopia ET ET ◊ Aden Aden City, Yemen 7O ◊ Aegean Islands Dodecanese Islands SV5 ◊ Afghanistan YA T6 ◊ Alaska K7 KL ◊ Albania ZA ZA ◊ Aldabra Islands Aldabra Islands S79 ◊ Algeria FA 7X ◊ Andaman Islands Andaman Islands VU4 ◊ Andorra C3 ◊ Anglo-Egyptian Sudan Sudan ST ST ◊ Angola CR6 D2 ◊ Argentina LU LU ◊ Ascension Island ZD8 ZD8 ◊ Australia VK VK ◊ Austria OE OE ◊ Azores islands CT2 CU ◊ Baluchistan Pakistan, Balochistan Province AP ◊ Bahama Islands VP7 C6 ◊ Bahrein Islands Bahrain VS8 A9 ◊ Balearic islands EA6 EA6 ◊ Barbados VP6 8P ◊ Bechuanaland Botswana A2 ◊ Belgian Congo Dem. Rep. of the Congo ON 9Q Burundi 9U Rwanda 9X ◊ Belgium ON ON ◊ Bermuda Islands VP9 VP9 ◊ Bhutan A5 Bismarck Archipelago Islands off the northeast coast ◊ of Papua New Guinea1 OC-008 Bismarck Archipelago P29 OC-025 Admiralty Islands P29 OC-103 St Matthias Group P29 OC-257 Nuguria Islands P29 OC-258 Coastal Islands North P29 ◊ Bolivia CP CP ◊ Borneo, Netherlands Borneo, Indonesia PK5 YB7 ◊ Brazil PY PY ◊ British Honduras Belize VP1 V3 ◊ British North Borneo Sabah State, Malaysia VS4 9M6 ◊ Brunei V8 ◊ Bulgaria LZ LZ ◊ Burma Myanmar XZ XZ ◊ Cameroons, French Cameroon FE8 TJ ◊ Canada Does not include VO1/VO2 VE VE Canal Zone Any area within 8 km of the NY HP ◊ Panama Canal ◊ Canary Islands EA8 EA8
    [Show full text]
  • Distr. LIMITED CDCC 22-3/Add.1 LC/CAR/L.162/Add.1 14 April 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
    1 Distr. LIMITED CDCC 22-3/Add.1 LC/CAR/L.162/Add.1 14 April 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REPORT ON THE MEETINGS CONVENED In Biennium 2006 - 2007 [Covering the period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2007] Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) P.O Box 1113, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago • Phone: (868) 623-5595 • Fax: (868) 623-8485 • www.eclacpos.org 1 MEETINGS CONVENED BY THE SUBREGIONAL HEADQUARTERS FOR THE CARIBBEAN since January 2006 Programme Description Venue No. Representatives/Experts from Budget Duration member States in attendance Code INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS 116214 Twenty First session of the CDCC 16-17 January Port of Spain 59 Barbados; Belize; Cuba; Dominican session [LC/CAR/L.86] 2006 Republic; Guyana; Jamaica; St. Lucia; Suriname; Trinidad & Tobago; Aruba, British Virgin Islands; Montserrat; Puerto Rico; US Virgin Islands; FAO; UNDP; UNEP/CAR/RCU; UNESCO; UNIFEM; PAHO;WHO; ACS; CARICAD; CARICOM; CDERA; IICA; CRNM; UWI 122802 High-level ministerial dialogue – 14-15 June Antigua and Barbuda 31 Antigua & Barbuda; Barbados; Social Security and sustainable 2006 Dominica; Jamaica; St.Kitts and development in the Caribbean Nevis; Suriname; Trinidad & Tobago; [LC/CAR/L.92] CDB; CIDA; OECS; DFID; ILO; OECS; UNDP; UNIFEM 119163-1 Caribbean Preparatory meeting for 22-24 May Antigua and Barbuda 51 Antigua & Barbuda; Belize; the tenth session of the Regional 2007 Dominica; Dominican Republic; Conference on women in Latin Grenada; Haiti; Jamaica; St. Lucia; America and the Caribbean St. Kitts/Nevis; St. Vincent and the [LC/CAR/L.127] Grenadines; Suriname; British Virgin Islands; Netherlands Antilles; Turks & Caicos; Cayman Islands; Consejo de Mujeres (Ecuador); OHCHR; UNFPA; UNIFEM; CIDA; CARICOM; CGDS 2 Programme Description Venue No.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL AGREEMENTON SR.10/57November 1956
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON SR.10/57November 1956 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIES Page 45 Tenth Session SUMMARY RECORD OF THE FIFTH MEETING Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva on Tuesday, 1 November 1955, at 10.00 a.m. Chairman: Mr. L. Dana WILGRESS (Canada) Subjects discussed: 1. 1956 Negotiations 2. French Stamp Tax 3. Italian Turnover Tax 4. Rhodesia - Nyasaland Tariff and South Africa- Southern Rhodesia Customs Union Mr. STANDENAT (Austria) said that he would like to put some questions on the report of the Working Party. (1) Was it intended that the consolidated list of offers (paragraph 10 (ii)) must be maintained as presented if a country's request were met, and should it reflect the requests of other countries? The equilibrium of overall concessions , referred to in paragraph 13, would be difficult to maintain unless these lists could be modified in the course of the negotiations. (2) The date of 1 October for the submission of lists (paragraph 15) had not been observed by most countries and he would suggest that a new date be fixed, perhaps 1 December, after which further lists of requests would no longer be considered. (3) Did rule 3 of the Annex mean that a country could not invoke the principal supplier rule if the principal supplier was taking part in the negotiations? (4) His delegation agreed with the appointment of a Tariff Negotiations Working Party (rule 9 of the Annex) and fixing of its terms of reference by the Tariff Negotiations Committee, but wore of the opinion that the delegation of powers to it should not go so far that the Working Party had authority to giveviews or recommendations without submitting them, through the Tariff Negotiations Committees for consideration to the CONTRACTING PARTIES.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Development and the Dynamics of Political Domination in Southern Matabeleland
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 19, Issue 4, Ver. III (Apr. 2014), PP 137-149 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Ethnicity, Development and the Dynamics of Political Domination in Southern Matabeleland Clifford Mabhena Institute of Development Studies- National University of Science and Technology-Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Abstract: This article argues that the hegemony of the Shona people in Zimbabwe has been largely influenced by ethnicity and the quest to dominate Matabeleland politically, socially and economically. Development marginalisation of Matabeleland region, I argue has been influenced by ethnicity and politics of revenge. The study used ethnography to collect data and hence in-depth interviews were used as data collection tools. The results of the study indicate that Matabeleland has been largely dominated by the Shona ethnic group, and arguments advanced by scholars for this dominance, it is argued, Ndebele dominated the Shona people in the 19th and 20th centuries. This was due to conquest by the marauding Ndebele warriors under the leadership of King Mzilikazi and latter on King Lobhengula. The ascendance of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front (ZANUPF) in the 1980 independence elections opened the gates for the ascendancy of the Shona people as the party was pre-dominantly Shona speaking. The march to state house by the ZANUPF dominated party created a lot of tension between the two ethnic groups; Ndebele and Shona, and hence the lashing out of the fifth brigade in 1983 and 1984 in Matabeleland and Midlands provinces of the country. Key words: Hegemony, ethnicity, internal colonisation, marginalisation I.
    [Show full text]