The Two Rivers: Water, Development and Politics in the Tigris-‐Euphrates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Two Rivers: Water, Development and Politics in the Tigris-‐Euphrates The Two Rivers: Water, Development and Politics in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin, 1920-1975 Dale Stahl Submitted in partial FulFillment oF the requirements For the degree oF Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School oF Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Dale Stahl All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Two Rivers: Water, Development and Politics in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin, 1920-1975 Dale Stahl At the end oF the First World War, new states were created in the Former domains oF the Ottoman Empire. In the region between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, Britain and France obtained through conquest and international writ new “mandate” territories in Iraq and Syria, while in 1923 a new Turkish republic was Founded on the Anatolian peninsula. During the next two decades, governments in these states planned a series of water control projects on the two rivers as part oF broad economic development eFForts. Many oF these projects were eventually constructed after the Second World War, shaping the environment oF the river basin with dams, Flood control and irrigation works, and hydroelectric power stations. By comparing these states' eFForts to exploit natural resources and manage the environment oF the basin, this study considers the environmental Function in the shiFt From empire to independent nation-state and in the diverse processes oF modern state Formation. Through water resource exploitation, Iraq, Syria and Turkey Founded modern bureaucracies, centralized control over natural resources, and justiFied new techniques to manage populations. However, the intentions oF Baghdad, Ankara and Damascus, as well as the results obtained, diFFered in signiFicant ways, providing insight not only into the nature oF these states, but also the political dimensions oF managing a critical natural resource. This dissertation is based on analysis oF archival records in Arabic, English, French and Turkish, collected From institutions in England, France, the United States, India and Turkey. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations ii Acknowledgments iii Introduction 1 Chapter One: Founded on Disaster 25 Chapter Two: The Rise of the Technocratic State 74 Chapter Three: Oil, Water, and a Plan For Development 108 Chapter Four: Building a Dam, Building a State 141 Chapter Five: Mesopotamia and the International Order 181 Conclusion 242 Bibliography 250 i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Map of Iraq, Syria, and Turkey 24 2. Aerial view oF the main Tigris breach north oF Baghdad, 1926 72 3. View oF Flooded Baghdad North Gate station and nearby markets, 1926 73 4. Aerial view oF the city oF Baqubah surrounded by Floodwaters, 1926 73 5. Road Map of Elazığ Province, 1964 179 6. Road Map of Elazığ Province, 2012 180 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a great pleasure to salute the many people who have played such important roles in bringing this dissertation to Fruition. First, I am very grateFul to Rashid Khalidi, teacher and advisor, For many years oF support. His incredible knowledge oF Middle Eastern history and counsel on items great and small have been invaluable. Several other Columbia University Faculty members have been critical to my development as a scholar and to this project’s genesis. Elizabeth Blackmar radically shiFted my concept oF what might be considered a historical source, challenged me to expand my analytical scope, and proFoundly impacted my pedagogy. As a result oF Richard Bulliet’s lectures, questions, and observations, I learned to look at history in new and original ways. Susan Pedersen’s critical eye and commitment to empiricism set a high standard For scholarship that will guide Further work on this project and my Future studies. This particular research was deeply inFluenced by Timothy Mitchell’s writings and his insightFul commentary. I oFFer thanks also to Adam McKeown, Gregory Mann, David Rosner, and Christine Philliou For their comments, suggestions, and intercessions. I owe a Further debt oF gratitude to the administrative staFF at the Department oF History For supporting me during my progress at Columbia. This research would not have been possible without the generous scholarships and Fellowships that allowed me to learn languages, travel to Faraway archives, and take time to think and write. I would like to thank the Department oF History, the Middle East Institute, and the Graduate School oF Arts and Sciences at Columbia University For their support throughout my graduate school years. Assistance From The American Academic iii Research Institute in Iraq (TAARII), the National Security Education Program, and the Howard and Natalie Shawn Summer Research Fellowship supported my Fieldwork. During my period oF writing, I beneFited From grants From the Institute oF Turkish Studies and the Whiting Foundation. Colleagues and Friends within the Columbia community and without helped me immeasurably on this journey. I oFFer special thanks to Aimee Genell, who I subjected at various points to early draFts oF the Following chapters. I am immensely grateFul For her constructive and sensitive critiques (as well as her fine Turkish soup recipes) and her dedication to history as an intellectual challenge and moral pursuit. It has been my good Fortune to stumble across good Columbians at several junctures in my Fieldwork. I am thankFul For their contributions to my scholarship and my well being when Far From home. My thanks to Merve Tezcanli, Jared Manasek, Abhishek Kaicker, Toby Harper, Stacey Van Vleet, Carey Kasten, and Shehab Ismail. I have beneFited greatly From conversations with several friends and colleagues including Oscar Aguirre Mandujano, Nathan Stroupe, Divya Cherian, Seth Anziska, Rosie Bsheer, Harun Buljina, Michael Christopher Low, Claire Edington, Dan Navon, Zoe GriFFith, Elizabeth Nolte, Dan Auger, Ryan Martin, Arunabh Ghosh, Mari Webel and Adrien Zakar. Research For this project took me to archives and libraries in Five countries. My thanks to the archivists and library staFF oF the institutions mentioned in the bibliography. A special thanks to Muaz Ayhan Işık at the TBMM Kütüphanesi, Ahmet Dölek at the Beyazıt Devlet Kütüphanesi, and Idir Ouahes at the Centre des Archives diplomatiques de Nantes For going out oF their way to help me Find materials. iv A research project oF this magnitude would not have been possible without the patience, thoughtfulness and encouragement oF Friends and Family. My thanks to Adam Teicholz; Peter and Carrie Atkin; Ellen, Joanna, Gary and Karen Bradley; Lyle Morton; Joyce Chen; Hannah Vanderlan; Molly Cherington; Mark Ganek; Sara Neff; and Brian Bergeron for listening, advising, motivating and being such good company. Thank you also to Louise BradFord For providing a cheerFul home away From home and a good dose oF encouragement at challenging moments. I am obliged to my brother Todd and sister- in-law JenniFer For much the same. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Molly Shea for being both an intellectual companion and kindred spirit during these past seven years. My parents, James and Dawn, made courageous and inspiring decisions early in my intellectual liFe, including endorsement oF a bachelor’s degree in history and the incredible Financial and emotional support necessary to make possible my First visit to the Middle East in 1999. They have demonstrated immense Faith and a powerFul conFidence in me, without which I could not have imagined pursuing a higher degree or executing this research. The Final note oF appreciation belongs to my partner in crime, my collaborator and Fellow schemer, Ty BradFord, whose presence in my liFe makes this work and much else more meaningful and a hell of a lot of fun. v INTRODUCTION The human handling and exploitation oF the water oF the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers has had a proFound impact on the Formation oF political communities in the rivers' basin For millennia. This is no less the case with the three new states—Turkey, Iraq and Syria—that emerged in the river basin aFter the First World War. This assertion Frames the Forthcoming chapters, which describe the myriad ways in which the interaction between government and environment produced the modern state, or more accurately, the modern eFFects oF stateness. The Following chapters describe the range of means—legal, institutional, economic, social, cultural, and diplomatic—that were brought to bear in shaping the relationship oF state and society to the environment oF the basin. These eFForts helped to deFine the action oF modern state power and the creation oF its objects, society and environment. This research demonstrates how the Framing and in some measure achieving oF centralized control over water allowed for the deFinition and penetration oF state power into new spheres of social and political life. Several chapters discuss how institutions for managing the environment were built (and not built) and how these institutions structured the Functions oF the state and the methods whereby political power might be exerted. The dissertation also discusses how the interaction oF government and environment worked at multiple levels, examining in close detail how popular support for new and invasive inFrastructure relied on certain myths and ideas about space and place. Finally, the dissertation examines how governments in Ankara, Damascus and Baghdad negotiated geopolitics and international relations to secure financing and 1 expertise in their various bids to turn recalcitrant, powerful rivers into valuable state- building resources. This study begins with the period just after World War I and traces a history of flood and flood control, of waterpower and water as power, through 1975, a year that marks the completion oF the First two massive dams on the Euphrates River in Turkey and Syria. Though parts oF this dissertation will range outside those dates, ending the study with the completion oF the dams is representative oF the ultimate claim oF this research. The construction oF these dam projects represents the achievement oF certain capabilities and arrangements oF bureaucratic state power and the (attempted in some cases) production oF political legitimacy through water management.
Recommended publications
  • The Possible Effects of Irrigation Schemes and Irrigation Methods on Water Budget and Economy in Atatürk Dam of South-Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey
    The possible effects of irrigation schemes and irrigation methods on water budget and economy in Atatürk dam of south-eastern Anatolia region of Turkey Huseyin Demir1, Ahmet Zahir Erkan2, Nesrin Baysan2, Gonca Karaca Bilgen2 1 GAP Şanlıurfa Tünel Çıkış Ağzı 2 GAP Cankaya, Ankara, Turkey Abstract. The South-eastern Anatolia Project (GAP) has been implemented in the southeast part of Turkey, covering 9 provinces and the two most important rivers of Turkey. The main purpose of this gorgeous project is to uplift the income level and living standards of people in the region, to remove the inter-regional development disparities and to contribute to the national goals of economic development and social stability. The cost of the project is 32 billion USD consisting of 13 sub-projects in the river basins of Euphrates and Tigris. The project has evolved over time and has become multi sectoral, integrated and human based on the sustainable regional development. Upon the fully completion of the project, 1.8 Million hectares of land will be able to be irrigated in Euphrates and Tigris Basins through surface and underground water resources. From 1995 until now, 273.000 ha. of land have already been irrigated within the GAP Project. Roughly 739,000 ha. of this land will be irrigated from Atatürk Dam, the largest dam of GAP Project. At present, nearly ¼ of this area is under irrigation. Some technological developments have been experienced in the Project area, ranging from upstream controlled schemes having trapezoidal section, lined or unlined, to upstream controlled schemes having high pressurized piped system; and from conventional methods to drip irrigation method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Agreed Contribution Document Towards the New Climate Change Agreement
    Nationally agreed contribution document towards the new climate change agreement Iraq 10/11/2015 Abbreviations BAU Business as Usual CCC Climate Change Center GHGs Greenhouses Gases UN United Nations UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change The Iraqi INDC does not constitute legally binding pledges upon Iraq, but rather a statement of national contributions including actions taken related to climate change. The submission of Iraq’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) report is pursuant with the decision adopted by UNFCCC COP 19 in November 2013. The preparation of the Iraqi INDC adopted a collaborative and consultative process and involved key ministries, departments and stakeholders following the UNFCCC guidelines on designing and preparing INDCs. Iraq’s commitment to addressing climate change has been demonstrated by the timely actions of Iraqi authorities to prepare this report. Iraq calls on developed country Parties to fulfill their commitments in supporting developing and fragile states to tackle the adverse impacts of climate change. Iraq’s preparation of this INDC report has been technically facilitated by UNDP under the GEF-funded project “Iraq’s Nationally Determined Contributions to UNFCCC 2015 Agreement." Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 National circumstances ................................................................................................. 3 Mitigation Scenarios………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4
    [Show full text]
  • World's Major Rivers
    WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss AAnn IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn ttoo iinntteerrnnaattiioonnaall wwwwwwaatteerr llaawwwwww wwwwwwiitthh ccaassee ssttuuddiieess THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss An introduction to international water law with case studies Colorado River Commission of Nevada 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: (702) 486-2670 Website: http://crc.nv.gov November 2008 Jacob (Jay) D. Bingham, Chairman Ace I. Robinson, Vice Chairman Andrea Anderson, Commissioner Marybel Batjer, Commissioner Chip Maxfield, Commissioner George F. Ogilvie III, Commissioner Lois Tarkanian, Commissioner George M. Caan, Executive Director Primary Author: Daniel Seligman, Attorney at Law Columbia Research Corp. P.O. Box 99249 Seattle, Washington 98139 (206) 285-1185 Project Editors: McClain Peterson, Project Manager Manager, Natural Resource Division Colorado River Commission of Nevada Sara Price Special Counsel-Consultant Colorado River Commission of Nevada Esther Valle Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada Nicole Everett Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK World’s Major Rivers ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Daniel Seligman at the Columbia Research Corp. wishes to thank Jacqueline Pruner, attorney at law in Seattle, for her contribution to the section on water law in Canada and her valuable editing assistance throughout the entire document. The staff at the Murray-Darling Basin Commission and Goulburn-Murray Water in Australia provided important information about the Murray-Darling River system, patiently answered the author’s questions, and reviewed the draft text on water trading. Staff at the International Joint Commission in Washington, D.C., and the Prairie Provinces Water Board in Regina, Canada, also offered helpful comments on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Deficient Developmental Planning Leading to Water Conflicts Across Political Borders: the Way Forward
    Engineering, 2021, 13, 158-172 https://www.scirp.org/journal/eng ISSN Online: 1947-394X ISSN Print: 1947-3931 Deficient Developmental Planning Leading to Water Conflicts across Political Borders: The Way Forward Elias Salameh1, Nadhir Al-Ansari2* 1University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan 2Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden How to cite this paper: Salameh, E. and Abstract Al-Ansari, N. (2021) Deficient Developmental Planning Leading to Water Conflicts across In this article, Turkey, Iran and Syria in the Middle East area are taken as Political Borders: The Way Forward. Engi- examples for deficient planning and development of water resources shared neering, 13, 158-172. with their downstream countries resulting in severe social, economic and polit- https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2021.133012 ical percussions to these neighbors. The current situation in the Middle East Received: February 24, 2021 with wars against terrorism, uprising of population groups, and COVID-19 Accepted: March 22, 2021 Pandemic have not allowed the affected countries Jordan, Iraq and Syria to Published: March 25, 2021 properly react to the assaults of upstream water development and diversions Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and on their fair shares in the transboundary waters. The rivers’ upstream deve- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. lopmental schemes have not taken advantages of recent advanced technolo- This work is licensed under the Creative gical knowhow of water efficient development and use, seemingly because the Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). arising water problems and catastrophes will not affect these upstream coun- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ tries, but their downstream neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Mesopotamia
    Mesopotamia Before History Began In prehistoric times, small bands of people roamed the hills to the North and East of the Fertile Crescent. They slept in temporary camps and hunted for food. Around 7000 B.C.E. they started to build towns. Life was easier for babies and children in the new settlements and more people lived to be adults. Eventually, there were not enough fields to support the people. They had to search for more land and they found a fertile plain bordered by two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates. The name Mesopotamia comes from two Greek words that mean “middle” and “river”. It was located between the forest region of northern Europe and Asia. Mesopotamia is a land surrounded by the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. The Euphrates is about 600 miles longer than the Tigris, but the Tigris carries more water. In ancient times, both were used for fishing, transportation and irrigation. The plain that became Mesopotamia had good farmland. The rivers carried soil down from the mountains and there was plenty of sunshine. However, there was not much rain. Plants need water to grow. There was plenty of water in the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Sumerian farmers learned to dig ditches and make water flow into the fields. This caused enough wheat and barley to grow to feed hundreds of people. This was one of the first uses of irrigation in the world. People began making pottery for carrying water, storing seed and preparing food. In Mesopotamia, building houses was difficult because there was little wood or stone so they learned how to make mud bricks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study in Surface Water Conflict Resolution M
    The Euphrates–Tigris Basin: A Case Study in Surface Water Conflict Resolution M. El-Fadel,* Y. El Sayegh, A. Abou Ibrahim, D. Jamali, and K. El-Fadl ABSTRACT rights (Haddad and Mizyed, 1996). This, coupled with drying oases and shrinking aquifers, is likely to cause water to replace Historically, the Euphrates and Tigris waters have been a oil as the traditional driver of conflict in the Middle East major source of freshwater conflict in the Middle East. Origi- nating in Turkey, both rivers flow southwestward through Syria (Mideast News, 1998). and Iraq, to discharge into the Persian Gulf. The irregularity in In the context presented above, the Euphrates–Tigris Basin their seasonal flow necessitates the development of efficient stor- represents one of the critical water conflict issues in the Mid- age and diversion systems to ensure adequate irrigation to the dle East. Turkey, Syria, and Iraq presently share the waters of area’s dominant agricultural sector. Consequently, water uti- this basin. There has been a history of disagreements among lization projects undertaken by upstream riparian countries these countries concerning the nature of these waters, their fair trigger confrontation, leading to hostilities and strained relations. and optimal distribution, and the rights of each nation to uti- These water development projects are best exemplified by the lize these water resources. Turkish GAP project, which provides Turkey extensive control While the conflict among the riparian countries is basically over the Euphrates water, through the construction of 22 dams posed in the context of water, it is inevitably linked with in- and 19 hydropower plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities of Restoring the Iraqi Marshes Known As the Garden of Eden
    Water and Climate Change in the MENA-Region Adaptation, Mitigation,and Best Practices International Conference April 28-29, 2011 in Berlin, Germany POSSIBILITIES OF RESTORING THE IRAQI MARSHES KNOWN AS THE GARDEN OF EDEN N. Al-Ansari and S. Knutsson Dept. Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Lulea University, Sweden Abstract The Iraqi marsh lands, which are known as the Garden of Eden, cover an area about 15000- 20000 sq. km in the lower part of the Mesopotamian basin where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers flow. The marshes lie on a gently sloping plan which causes the two rivers to meander and split in branches forming the marshes and lakes. The marshes had developed after series of transgression and regression of the Gulf sea water. The marshes lie on the thick fluvial sediments carried by the rivers in the area. The area had played a prominent part in the history of man kind and was inhabited since the dawn of civilization by the Summarian more than 6000 BP. The area was considered among the largest wetlands in the world and the greatest in west Asia where it supports a diverse range of flora and fauna and human population of more than 500000 persons and is a major stopping point for migratory birds. The area was inhabited since the dawn of civilization by the Sumerians about 6000 years BP. It had been estimated that 60% of the fish consumed in Iraq comes from the marshes. In addition oil reserves had been discovered in and near the marshlands. The climate of the area is considered continental to subtropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit
    Address before a joint session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf crisis and the federal budget deficit. Powers and Principalities This WordPress.com site is The tAhme ecraitc’as npsa jwamitha Ds isabilities Act Conspiracy Blog Stats 11,545 hits The American with Disabilities Act Conspiracy The American with Disabilities Act was not the social security disability retirement act, and the timing of the enactment of the legislation by President George HW Bush on July 26, 1990 was an “inclusion” fraud and conspiracy with me specifically in mind, my postal hiring (orientation) had been scheduled approximately at least two months prior to my starting date of July 30, 1990. George HW Bush was Congressman from Texas, Ambassador to China, Central Intelligence director, and Vice president of the United States for eight years and President for four years. The invasion into Kuwait on August 2, 1990 was an intentional scheme act. Jury duty beginning January 14, 1991 was an extension of the scheme, with Saddam Hussein’s deadline to withdraw troops from Kuwait being on January 16, 1991 and the declaration of Desert Storm, a name chosen from the bible…..Daniel chapter 11. The 9/11/90 New World Order speech was the first speech I watched the president make as a new Federal employee. A five point speech. The directions and recommendation to fill out an EEO after the Waco, Texas siege that ended April 19, 1993, had begun was a continuation with the War crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The timing of proposed resolutions and nominations and resolution passage and confirmations, with the presumed foresight of those involved of the conclusions of the motions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Monarchy As Antithetical Terms?: Iraq's Elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth
    www.ssoar.info Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bishop, E. (2013). Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 13(2), 313-326. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-447205 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? 313 Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? Iraq’s Elections of September 1954 ELIZABETH BISHOP Historian Bernard Lewis observes: ”Americans tend to see democracy and monarchy in antithetical terms; in Europe, however, democracy has fared better in constitutional monarchies than in republics”1. Let us take this opportunity to consider elections held in the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq during the Cold War, in order to assess how”democracy” fared during the years that country was a constitutional monarchy. As we do so, let’s keep Saad Eskander’s words in mind: ”You cannot have democracy in Iraq by just holding elections... You need to enable Iraq’s core of citizens to have free access to information, absolutely all, all of legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Francesca Trivellato (July 2016) Postal Address: Office
    Francesca Trivellato (July 2016) Postal Address: Office: Rosenkranz, Room 341 The MacMillan Center at Yale Phone: (203) 432-3423 PO Box 208206 francesca.trivellato[@]yale.edu New Haven CT 06520-8206 Abbreviated Curriculum Vitae Academic positions Frederick W. Hilles Professor of History, Yale University (Jan. 2012–present) Professor of History, Yale University (July 2007–Dec. 2011) Assistant Professor of History, Yale University (Jan. 2004–June 2007) Assistant Professor of Early Modern European History, University of Venice Ca’ Foscari, Italy (Fall 2001–Fall 2003) Education Ph.D., History, Brown University (2004) Dissertation: “Trading Diasporas and Trading Networks in the Early Modern Period: A Sephardic Partnership of Livorno in the Mediterranean, Europe, and Portuguese India (ca. 1700-1750).” Winner of the 2004 prize for the best unpublished manuscript awarded by the Society for Italian Historical Studies. Ph.D., Economic and Social History, Università Luigi Bocconi, Milan, Italy (1999) Dissertation: “Arti e mercati: Produzione e commercio del vetro a Venezia nei secoli XVII e XVIII.” B.A., History, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italy (1995) Honors thesis: “L’arte madre: Il vetro veneziano nel XVII secolo;” grade: 110/110 cum laude. Co-winner of the 1999 prize for the best honors thesis awarded by the Italian Committee of the Association Internationale pour l’Histoire du Verre. Short Visiting Appointments École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris (May 2017 and February 2010) The Paris Institute of Political Studies [SciencesPo] (October 2016) Visitor, Faculy of the Arts, Monash Univeristy (July-September 2016) Visiting Associate in History, California Institute of Technology (May 2012) July 2016 Trivellato, C.V.
    [Show full text]