<<

Appendix

Glossary of Chinese Terms

Anyang (area) Bajia site bi (circular objects) Changping Baifu site Chengzishan site Chijiaying village Chutoulan village Dadianzi site Daguan mountain Dajing site of Linxi County Damiao village Damohugou Dadongguou ding tripod Dongbajia site Dongmagou site Dongnangou site

243 244 APPENDIX

Dongshanzu site dou pedestal Erligang phase Erlitou phase Fanzhangzi site Fengxia site Fuhe culture Fushanzhuang village ge dagger-axe Guangfu Yingzixigou (tributary) gui vessel Gushanzi site Hongshanhou site Hongtugou Hu people huang (semilunar-shape pendants) Huaxia Hutougou site Jiang clan jue vessel Kalaqin site Kangjiawan village kui dragon Laidaigou stream Laoha river Laotouxigou stream li tripod Liaoz hongjing Liulihe site Lower Xiajiadian culture APPENDIX 245

Nanshangen site Ningcheng site Nuluerhu mountain range Pingdingshan site Pingfang site Pingquan Dongnangou site Qidan people Qilaotu mountain range Sanzuodian site (village) Sifangdi site Shanrong people Shi (warrior-nobles of the class) Shuiquan site taotie motif Weiyingzi culture Xiajiadian site Xiaobaiyang site Xiaoheishigou site Xiaoheyan period Xiaojiadi tributary Xiaozhuanshanzi site Xigangou River Xilamulun River Xilugehe River Xindian site Xishangen site Xishantou site Xitai site state Xuchang area 246 APPENDIX

Yan state Yaowangmiao site Yinhe River Yingjinhe River Yinjiadian village Yinxu Yueshi culture yun lei (cloud and thunder) Yuxi area Zhaobaogou culture Zhaosuhe River Zhengzhou site Zhizhushan site (Central Plain) Zhoujiadi site Zhukaigou site Zuojiaying village

CHINESE JOURNALS

Kaogu Kaogu tongxun Kaogu xuebao Kaogu yu wenwu Liaohai wenwu xuekan daxue xuebao Lishi yanjiu Neimenggu wenwu kaogu Wenwu Wenwu ziliao congkan Zhaowuda mengzu shizhuan xuebao Zhiwu taixue yu di zhiwuxue congkan Zhiwu xuebao Zhongyuan wenwu References

TITLES IN CHINESE

An Jinhuai, 1985, Dui tansuo Xia wenhua de yi xie tihui (Some insights concerning the explo- ration of Xia culture), in: Xia shi luncong, Jiaolu shushe, , pp. 32-38. An Zhimin, 1954, Tangshan shiguomu ji qi xiangguan de yiwu ( Tangshun stone slab graves and their artifacts), Kuogu xuebuo 7:77-86. An Zhimin, 1981, Zhongguo zaoqi tongqi de jige wenti (Some questions concerning the Chi- nese early ), Kuogu xuebao 3:269-286. Aohanqi bowuguan, 1991, Aohanqi Nantaidi Zhaobaogou wenhua yizhi diaocha (Survey of the Zhaobaogou culture site of Nantaidi at Aohan banner), Neimmggu wenwu kuogu 5:2-10. Aohanqi Dadianzi gongshe lishi yanjiu xiaozu, 1976, Cong Dadianzi dengdi chutu wenwu kan lishi shang de jieji fenhua (The development of social classes according to the excavated materials from Dadianzi and other places), Wenwu 1:79-84. Balinyouqi bowuguan, 1987, Neimenggu Balinyouqi Nasitai yizhi diaocha (Survey at the Na- sitai site, Bulinyou banner, ), Kuogu 6:507-518. Beijing gangtie xueyuan yejin shizu, 1981, Zhongguo zaoqi tongqi de chubu yanjiu (Prelimi- nary research on the earliest Chinese bronzes), Kuogu xuebuo 3:287-301. Beijingshi wenwu guanlichu, 1976a, Beijing Liulihe Xiajiadian xiacang wenhua muzang (lower Xiajiadian graves from Liulihe, Beijing), Kuogu 1:59-60. Beijingshi wenwu guanlichu, 1976b, Beijing diqu de you yi zhongyao kaogu shouhuo (Another important archaeological discovery in the Beijing area), Kuogu 4:246-258. Beijingshi wenwu guanlichu, 1979, Beijingshi Yanqiangxiang Xibozicong jiaozang tongqi (A bronze artifacts cache from the Xibozi village, Yanqing county Beijing municipality), Kaogu 3:227-230. Beijingshi wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, 1990, Shinian lai Beijing kaogu de xin chengguo (New ar- chaeological achievements of the last ten years in the Beijing Area), in: Wenwu kaogu gongzuo shinian 1979-89, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 1-13. Du Zhengsheng, 1991, Xiadai kaogu ji qi guojia fazhan de tansuo (Discussion on the archaeol- ogy of and the development of its state), Kuogu 1:43-56. Fang Dianchun and Liu Baohua, 1984, Liaoning Fuxinxian Hutougou Hongshan wenhua yuqimu de faxian (The discovery of Hongshan grave containing jade artifacts at Hu- tougou, Fuxin county, Liaoning), Wenwu 6:1-5. 247 248 REFERENCES

Guo Dashun, 1987, Shilun Weiyingzi leixing (Discussing the Weiyingzi culture), in: Kaoguxue wenhua lunji ( Bingqi, ed.), Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 79-98. Guo Dashun, 1989, Liaoxi guwenhua de xin renshi (New discoveries of ancient cultures in west Liaoning), in: Qingzbu kaogu wusbiwu nian, Wenwu chubanshe, Bei- jing, pp, 203-215. Guo Dashun, 1993, Liaohai liuyu “beifang shi qingtongqi” de faxian yu yanjiu (The discovering and research of the “northern stile bronze artifacts” at the Liao river basin), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu1 -2:23-28. Guo Dashun and Ma Sha, 1985, Yi Liaohe liuyu wei zhongxin de xinshiqi wenhua ( cultures in the Liao river valley and its vicinity), Kaogu xuebao 4:417-444. Guo Dashun and Zhang Keju, 1984, Liaoningsheng Kezuoxian Dongshanzui Hongshan wenhua jianzhu qunzhi fajue jianbao (Preliminary excavation report of the Hongshan site at Dong- shanzui of Kezuo County, Liaoning province), Wenwu 11:1-11. sheng bowuguan, 1977, Hebei Pingquan Dongnangou Xiajiadian shangceng wenhua muzang (The Upper Xiajiadian culture graveyard at Pingquan Dongnangou, Hebei), Kaogu 1:51-55. Hebei sheng wenwu yanjiusuo, 1990, Heibei sheng xinjin shinian de wenwu kaogu gongzuo (Archaeological work of the last ten years at Hebei province), in: Wenwu kaogu gongzuo shinian 1979-89, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 25-36. sheng wenwu yanjiusuo, 1990, Jin shinian Henan wenwu kaogu gongzuo de xin jinzhang (Archaeological developments in the last ten years at Henan province), in: Wenwu kaogu gongzuo shinian 1979-89, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 176-181. Jianpingxian wenhuaguan, Chaoyang dichu bowuguan, 1983, Liaoning Jianpingxian qingtong shidai muzang ji xiangguan yiwu (Bronze age graveyards from Jianping county, Liaoning, and related artifacts), Kaogu 8:679-694. Jin Fengyi, 1991, Jundushan Shanrong wenhua mudi zangzhi yu zhuyao qiwu tezheng (The burial system and characteristic artifacts of the Sbanrong culture cemetery of Jun- dusban), Liaohai wenwu xuekan 1:61-73. Kazuoxian wenhuaguan, 1977, Liaoningsheng Kezuoxian Shanwanzi chutu Yin Zhou qing tongqi (Shang and Zhou bronze vessels found at Sbanwanzi, Kazuo county of Liaoning province), Wenwu 12:23-33. Kong Zhaochen and Du Naiqiu, 1981, Neimenggu zizhiqu ji ge kaogu didian de baofen fenxi zai gu zhibei he qihoushang de yiyi (The climatic implication of the distribution vegeta- tion pollen in some archaeological sites at the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), Zhiwu taixue yu di zhiwuxue congkan 5(3):195-202. Kong Zhaochen, Du Naiqiu, Liu Guanming, and Yang Hu, 1991, Neimenggu zizhiqu Chifengshi jujin 8000-2400 nian jian huanjing kaogxue de chubu yanjiu (Preliminary environmental archaeology research on the period between 8000-2400 BP in Chifeng, the Inner Monge lia Autonomous Region), Huanjing kaogu yanjiu, Kexue chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 112- 119. Li Gongdu, 1986, Liaoning Lingyuanxian Sanguandianzi Changzishan yizhi shijue baogao (Trial excavation of the Changzisban site of Sanguandianzi, Lingyuan county, Liaoning), Kaogu 6:497-510. Li Gongdu and Gao Meixuan, 1985, Xiajiadian xiacang wenhua ruogan wenti yanjiu (Research of certain questions concerning the Lower Xiajiadian culture), Liaoning daxue xuebao 5:154-161. Li Jinghan, 1980, Shilun Xiajiadian xiaceng wenhua de fenqi he leixing (Discussing the sub- periods and types of the Lower Xiajiadian culture), in: Zhongguo kaoguxuebui di yi ci nianbui lunwenji, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 163-170. Li Yangsong, 1980, Cong Henan Longshan wenhua de ji ge leixing tan Xia wenhua de ruogan wenti (From the types of Henan Longshan culture, discussing some questions concerning REFERENCES 249

the Xia culture), in: Zhongguo kaogu xuehui di yi ci nianbui lunwenji, Wenwu chuban- she, Beijing, pp. 32-49. Li Min, 1985, Yu Gong Ji zhou yu Xia wenhua tansuo (Examining Xia culture and Ji province of Yugong), in: Xia sbi luncong, Jiaolu shushe, Jinan, pp. 39-55. LiWenyi and LiangYulian, 1985, Hebei dongbu quanxinshi wennuanqi zhibei yu huanjing (Veg- etation and the environment of eastern Hebei during the Pleistocene), Zhiwu xuebao 27(6):640-651. Liang Siyung, 1959, Liang Siyung Kaogu Lunwenji (Collection of essays on archaeology by Liang Siyung), Kexue chubanshe, Beijing. Liaoning sheng Zhaowudameng wenwu gongzuozhan, 1973, Ningchengxian Nanshangen de shiguomu (Stone coffin grave of Nanshangen, Ningcbeng county), Kaogu xuebao 2:27-38. Liaoning sheng wenwu ganbu peixunban, 1976, Liaoning Beipiaoxian Fengxia yizhi 1972 nian chun fajue jianbao (Preliminary report on the 1972 excavations at Fengxia site in Beipiao county, Liaoning), Kaogu 3:197-210. Liaoning sheng bowuguan, 1977, Liaoning Aohanqi Xiaoheyan sanzhong yuanshi wenhua de faxian (The discovery of three prehistoric cultures in the Xiaoheyan area, Aohan Banner, Liaoning province), Wenwu 12:1-15. Liaoning sheng bowuguan, 1983a, Neimenggu Chifenxian Sifendi Dongshanzui yizhi shijue jianbao (preliminary report on the trial excavation at Dongshanzui site, Sifendi, Chifeng county, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 5:420-429. Liaoning sheng bowuguan wenwu gongzuodui, 1983b, Liaoning Jianpingxian Kalaqin Hedong yizhi shijue jianbao (Preliminary report of the Kalaqin site in Jianping county, Liaoning), Kaogu 11:973-981. Liaoning sheng bowuguan wenwu gongzuodui, 1983c, Liaoning Linxixian Dajing gutongkuang 1976 nian shijue jianbao (preliminary report of the 1976 trial excavation of the old bronze ore mine in Linxi county, Liaoning), Wenwu ziliao congkan 7:138-146. Liaoning sheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, 1986, Liaoning Niuheliang Hongshan wenhua “Nushenmiao” yu jishi zhongqun fajue jianbao (Preliminary report on the excavations of the “goddess temple” and stone pile graves of the Hongshan culture at Niuheliang, Liaon- ing), Wenwu 8:1-17. Liaoning sheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, 1992, Liaoning Fuxin Pingdingshan shichengzhi fajue baogao (Report on the excavations of Pingdingsban stone wall site, Fuxin, Liaoning), Kaogu 5:399-417. Liaoyangshi wenwu guanlisuo, 1977, Liaoyang Erdaohezi shiguanmu (Stone coffin grave of Er- daoheze Liaoyang), Kaogu 5:302-305. Liu Guanmin, 1986, Shixi Xiajiadian xiaceng wenhua de tao Li (An analytical study of the Li of Lower Xiajiadian), in: Zhongguo kaoguxue yunjiu, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 94-100. Liu Guanmin, 1987, Xilamulunhe liuyu butong xitong de kaoguxue wenhua fenbu quyu de bianqian (Changes in the distribution of different archaeological cultures in the Xilamu- lun river basin), in: Kaoguxue wenhua lunji (Su Bingqi, ed.), Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 48-57. Liu Guanmin, 1992, Neimenggu Chifengshi Dadianzi mudi shuyao (Report on the excavations at Dadianzi cemetery, Chifeng municipality, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 4:304-309. Liu Guanming and Xu Guangji, 1981, Neimenggu dongbu diqu qintong shidai de liang zhong wenhua (Two types of Bronze Age cultures of the eastern part of Inner Mongolia), nei- menggu wenwu kaogu 1:5-14. Liu Guanming and Xu Guangji,1989, Xiaojiadian xiaceng wenhua caihuishi (The painting style of the Lower Xiajiadian culture), in: Qingzbu Su Bingqi kaogu wusbiwu nian, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 227-234. 250 REFERENCES

Liu Jinxiang, 1986, Dadianzi mudi yiqun taoqi (An analytical study of the B group pottery from graves in the Dadianzi cemetery), in: Zhongguo kaoguxue yanjiu, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 101-104. Liu Jinxiang, 1989, Zhaobaogou wenhua chulun (Preliminary discussion of the Zhaobaogou Culture), in: Qingzhu Su Bingqi kaogu wusbiwu nian, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 198-202. Liulihe kaogu gongzuodui, 1974, Beijing fujin faxian de Xizhou nuli xunzang mu (Western Zhou slave sacrificial graves discovered near Beijing), Kaogu 5:309-321. Liulihe kaogudui, 1990, Beijing Liulihe 1193 hao damu fajue jianbao (A brief report on the ex- cavation of tomb 1193 at Liulihe, Beijing), Kaogu 1:20-31. Luoyang bowuguan, 1978a, Luoyang Cuoli yizhi shijue (Trial excavation at Cuoli site, Luo- yang), Kaogu 1:5-17. Luoyang bowuguan, 1978b, Luoyang dongmagou Erlitou leixing muzang (The Erlitou culture graveyard at Dongmagou, Luoyang), Kaogu 1:18-22. Neimenggu zizhiqu Zhaowudameng wenwu gongzuodui, 1963, Neimenggu Zhaowudameng Shiyang Shihushan xinshiqi shidai muzang (Neolithic grave from Shiyang Shihu mountain, Zhaowudameng, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), Kaogu 3:523-524. Neimenggu zizhiqu wenwu gongzuodui, 1965, Neimenggu Ningchengxian Xiaoyushulinzi yizhi shijue jianbao (Preliminary report on the test excavation of the Xiaoyushulinzi site at Ningcheng county, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 12:619-621. Neimenggu wenwu gongzuodui, 1984, Aohanqi Fanzhangzi gumuqun fajue jianbao (Prelimi- nary report on the excavation of ancient cemetery of Fanzhangzi at Aohan banner), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu 3:22-25. Neimenggu caochang ziyuan yaogan yingyung kaochadui, 1988, Neimenggu zizhiqu Chifeng- shi ziran tiaojian yu caocbang ziyuan ditu (Maps of natural conditions and natural resources of the Chifeng area, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), Kexue chubanshe, Beijing. Neinenggu wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, 1990, Neimenggu wenwu kaogu gongzuo de xin jinzhan (New progresses in the archaeology of Inner Mongolia), in: Wenwu kaogu gongzuo shi- nian 1979-89, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 47-59. Ningchengxian wenhuaguan, 1985, Ningchengxianxin faxian de Xiajiadian shangceng wenhua muzang ji qi xiangguan yiwu de yanjiu (Research of Upper Xiajiadian graves newly dis- covered at Ningcheng county and related artifacts), Wenwu ziliao congkan 9:23-58. Qiao Xiaoqin, 1992, Guanyu beifang youmu wenhua qiyuan de tantao (Inquiry into the origin of the northern nomadic culture), Neimangu wenwu kaogu 1,2:21-25. Qiu Shanwen, Li Qusheng, Xia Yumei, and Wang Jinglu, 1992, Dongbei xibu shadi guturang yu quanxinshi huanjing (Ancient desert soils and the environment of the western area of northeast during the Pleistocene), in: Zhongguo quanxinshi danuanqi qibou yu huanjing, Haiyang chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 153-160. Shi Peijun, 1991, Dili huaunjing yanbian yanjiu de lilun yu shijian (Theory and practice of research into geography environment changes), Kexue chubanshe, Beijing. Song Yuqin, 1992, Yi Xia Shang sanzhong kaoguxue wenhua jiaohui diyu qiantan (Preliminary discussion on the regional interaction between the three archaeological cultures of Yi Xia and Shang), Zhongyuan wenwu 1:11-19. Su He, 1982, Cong Zhaomeng faxian de daxing qingtongqi shilun beifang de zaoqi qingtong wenming (Preliminary discussion of early bronze culture in the north based on the large bronze vessels discoverd at Zhaomeng), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu 2:1-5. Sun Guangqing, 1989, Cong kaogu faxian tan Zhongguo gudai wenming de qiyuan wenti (Dis- cussing the origin of Chinese civilization according to archaeological findings), Zbongyuan wenwu 2:7-14. REFERENCES 251

Sun Miao, 1987, Xia Shang Shigao (Historical discussions on the Xia and Shang), Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing. Sun Shoudao, 1984, Sanxingtala Hongshan wenhua yulong kao (Study of the Hongshan jade dragon found at Sanxingtala), Wenwu 67-10. Sun Shoudao and Guo Dashun, 1984, Lun Liaohe liuyu de yuanshi wenming yu long de qiyuan (Discussing the development of dragon and the primitive culture of the Liao river basin), Wenwu 6:11-17. Tian Guangjin, 1992, Neimenggu shiqi shidai—qintong shidai kaogu faxian he yanjiu (The dis- covery and study of archaeology from to Bronze Age in Inner Mongolia), Nei- menggu wenwu kaogu 1-2:1-20. Tian Guangjin, 1993a, Neimenggu changcheng didai zhu kaoguxue wenhua yu linjing tongqi wenhua xianghu yingxiang guilu de yanjiu (Research on the mutual influence among cul- tures of the Great Wall region of Inner Mongolia and adjacent areas), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu 1-2:16-22. Tian Guangjin, 1993b, Neimenggu changcheng didai shicheng juluozhi ji xiangguan zhu wenti (Some questions concerning the clusters of stone wall sites found in the Great Wall region of Inner Mongolia), in: Jinian Chengziya yizhi fajue 60 zhounian guoji xuesbu taolun- hui winji, Jiaolu shushe, Jinan, pp. 1-11. Tian Guangjin, 1995, Shixi Zhongguo beifang xumuqi wenti (Preliminary analysis of the de- velopment of pastoralism), in: Zhongguo beifang gudai wenhua guoji xueshu yantao- hui wenji (Su He, ed.), Zhongguo wenshi chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 110-112. Tian Guangjin and Guo Suxin, 1986, Eerduosi shi qingtongsi (Ordos style bronze artifacts), Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing. Tian Guangjin and Shi Peijun, 1995, Neimenggu changcheng didai huanjing kaoguxue de chubu yanjiu (Preliminary environmental archaeological research of the Great Wall region of Inner Mongolia), Unpublished paper. Tianjinshi wenhuaju kaogu fajuedui, 1966, Hebei dachang huizu zizhi Datuotou yizhi shijue jianbao (Preliminary report on the trial excavation at Datuotou site, Dachang Hui Au- tonomous county, Hebei province), Kaogu 1:8- 13. Tong Zhuchen, 1957, Chifeng Dongbajia shicheng zhi kancha ji (A report of survey at the Dongbajia stone wall site of the Chifeng area), Kaogu tongxun 6230-237. Tong Zhuchen, 1986, Zhongguo xinshiqi shidai wenhua de duo zhongxin fazhan lun he fazhan bu pingheng lun (Discussion on the theory of multi-centers development and unbalance development of Chinese Neolithic cultures), Wenwu 2: 16-30. Wang Chengsheng, 1991, Gaishu jinnian Liaoning xinjian qingtong duanjuan (Outline discus- sion of short bronze swords recently discovered in the Liaoning province), Liaohai wenwu xuekan 1:74-81. Wang Gang, 1994, Linxixian Dajing gu tongkuang yizhi (Old copper ore mine site at Linxi county), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu 10(1):45-50. Wang Huide, 1992, Guanyu Xiajiadian xiaceng wenhua gucheng de ji ge wenti (Some ques- tions concerning the cities of the Lower Xiajiadian culture), Zhaowuda mengzu shizhuan xuebao 13:82-88. Wang Liren, 1990, Chifengshi guotu ziyuan (Natural resources and state land in the Chifeng municipality), Neimenggu renmin chubanshe, Huhehoute. Wengniuteqi wenhuaguan, 1984, Neimenggu Wangniuteqi Sanxingtalacun faxian yulong (Jade dragon found at the Sanxingtala village, Wangniute banner, Inner Mongolia), Wenwu 6:6. Wenwu kaogu gongzuo sanshi nian (Thirty years of archaeology and culture relics research), 1979, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing. Wu En, 1985, Yin zhi Zhouchu de beifang qingtongqi (Northern bronzes from Yin to early Zhou), Kaogu xuebao 2:135-156, 252 REFERENCES

Xiang Chunsong and Li Yi, 1995, Ningcheng Xiaoheishigou shiguomu diaocha qingli baogao (Report of the research of the stone coffin grave found at Xiaoheishigou, Ningcheng), Wenwu 5:4-22. Xin Zhongguo de Kaogu Faxian be Yanjiu (XZGKG) (Archaeological excavation and re- searches in new China), 1984, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing. Xu Guangji, 1986, Chifeng Yingjinhe, Yinhe liuyu de shicheng yizhi (The stone-wall sites of the Yingjin and Yin river basins in Chifeng area), in: Zhongguo kaoguxue yanjiu, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 82-93. , 1959, 1959 nianxiaYuxi diaocha “Xiaxu” de chubu baogao (Preliminary report on the “Xiaxu” 1959 summer survey of west Yu), Kaogu 11:592-600. XuYulin, 1989, Dongbei diqu xinshiqi de wenhua gaishu (General description of Neolithic cul- tures in the Northeast), Liaohai wenwu xuekan 1:56-87. Yan Wan, 1975, Beijing, Liaoning chutu tongqi yu Zhouchu de Yan (Bronze vessels found at Beijing and Liaoning and the Yan of the early Zhou period), Kaogu 5:274-279. Zhai Defang, 1984, Beifang diqu chutou zhi maxian he mabiao luelunn (A brief discussion on horse bits and chains found in ), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu 3:33-39. Zhai Defang, 1994, Shilun Xiajiadian shangceng wenhua qingtongqi (Preliminary discussion on bronze artifacts of the Upper Xiajiadian culture), in: Neimenggu wenwu kaogu wenji (Li Yiyou and Wei Jian, eds.), Zhongguo dabaike quanshu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 296-316. Zhang Zhongpei, 1986, Zhongguo beifang kaogu wenji (Collection of articles on the archae- ology of north China), Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing. Zhang Zhongpei, 1991, Guanyu Neimenggu dongbu dichu kaogu de ji ge wenti (Some ques tions concerning the archaeology of eastern Inner Mongolia), in: Neimenggu dongbu kaoguxue wenbua yanjiu wenji, Haiyangshan chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 3-8. Zhang Zhongpei, Kong Zhesheng, Zhang Wenjun, and Chen Young, 1987, Xiajiadian xiaceng wenhua yanjiu (Research of the Lower Xiajiadian culture), in: Kaoguxue wenhua lunji, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 58-78. Zhangjiakou kaogudui, 1982, Yuxian kaogu jilue (Sketchy description of the archaeology ofYu county), Kaogu yu wenwu 4:10-14. Zhangjiakoushi wenwu shiye guanlisuo, 1985, Zhangjiakoushi Baimiao yizhi qingli jianbao (Brief report on the Baimiao site of Zhangjiakou city), Wenwu 10:23-30. Zhangjiakoushi wenwu shiye guanlisuo, 1987, Hebei Xuanhuaxian Xiaoyang mudi faijue baogao (Report on the excavations at the Xiaobaiyang graveyard, Xuanhua county, Hebei), Wenwu 5:41-51. Zhao Guangxian, 1994, Guanyu Liulihe 1193 hao Zhoumu de ji ge wenti (Some questions con- cerning Zhou period tomb number 1193 from Liulihe), Lishi yanjiu 2:3-9. Zhao Zhiquan, 1987, Lun Erlitou yizhi wei Xiadai wanqi duyi (The Erlitou site as a capital city of the late Xia dynasty), Huaxia kaogu 2:196-204. Zhao Zhiquan, 1989, Erlitou wenhua yu Erligang wenhua (The Erlitou and the Erligang cul- tures), in: Qingzhu Su Bingqi kaogu wusbiwu nian, Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing, pp, 273-279. Zheng Jiexiang, 1988, Xiashi chutan (Preliminary exploration of Xia history), Zhongzhou guji chubanshe, Zhengzhou. Zheng Jiexiang, 1989, Jianguo yilai de Xia wenhua tansuo (The exploration of Xia culture since the foundation of the P.R.C.), Zhongyuan wenwu 3:27-34. Zhongguo dabaike quansbu; kaoguxue (ZGDBK) (The Chinese big encyclopaedia; archaeol- ogy), 1986, Zhongguo dabaike quanshu chubanshe, Beijing, Shanhai. Zhongguo kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1961, Neimenggu Chifeng Yaowangmiao, Xiajiadian yizhi shijue jianbao (Preliminary report on the test excavations at Yaowangmiao and Xiajiadian sites, in Chifeng area), Kaogu xuebao 2:77-81. REFERENCES 253

Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo dongbei gongzuodui, 1973, Ningchengxian Nan- shangen de shiguomu (Stone slabs grave of Nanshangen in Ningcheng county), Kaogu xuebao 2:27-38. Zhongguo kexue kaogu yanjiu Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1974, Chifeng Yaowangmiao, Xiajiadian yizhi shijue baogao (Report on the test excavations at Yaowangmiao and Xiajiadian sites, in Chifeng area), Kaogu xuebao 1:111-144. Zhongguo kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Liaoning gongzuodui, 1975a, Aohanqi Dadianzi yizhi 1974 nian shijue jianbao (Preliminary report on the 1974 excavations at Dadianzi site, Ao- han banner), Kaogu 2:99-108. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1975b. Ningcheng Nan- shangen yizhi fajue gao (Report of the excavations at Nanshangen site in Ningcheng area), Kaogu xuebao 1:117-140. Zhongguo kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Erlitou gongzuodui, 1975c, Henan Yanshi Erlitou yizhi san, ba, chu fajue jianbao (Preliminary report on the excavations in areas 3 and 8 at the Erlitou site, Yanshi, Henan), Kaogu 5:302-309. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Erlitou gongzuodui, 1976, Yanshi Erlitou yizhi xin faxian de tongqi he yuqi (New bronze and jade artifacts discovered at the Erlitou site), Kaogu 4:259-263. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Luoyang gongzuodui, 1978, 1975 nian Yuxi kaogu diancha (1975 survey at theYuxi area), Kaogu 1:23-34. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1979, Chifeng Zhizhushan yizhi de fajue (Excavations at the Zhizhushan site in Chifeng area), Kaogu xuebao 2:215-244. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo dongbei gongzuodui, 1981, Neimenggu Ningchengxian Nanshangen 102 hao shiguomu (Stone coffin grave No. 102 or Nan- shangen, Ningcheng county, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 4:304-308. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1982, Chifeng Xishui- quan Hongshan wenhua yizhi (Xishuiquan Hongshan culture site in Chifeng area), Kaogu xuebao 2:183-198. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1984, Neimenggu Ac- hanqi Zhoujiadi mudi fajue jianbao (Brief report on the excavation of the Zhoujiadi grave- yard site at Aohan banner, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 5:417-426. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1987, Neimenggu Ao- hanqi Xiaoshan yizhi (The Xiaoshan site, Aohan banner, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 6:481-506. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo Neimenggu gongzuodui, 1988, Neimenggu Ao- hanqi Zhaobaogou yihao yizhi fajue jianbao (Preliminary report of the excavations of Zhaobaogou number one site, Aohan banner, Inner Mongolia), Kaogu 1:1-6. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo, 1996, Dadianzi:Xiajiadian xiaceng wenhua yizhi yu mudi fajue baogao (Dadianzi: excavations of the domestic site and cemetery of the Lower Xiajiadian period), Kexue chubanshe, Beijing. Zhu Yanping, 1991, Liaoxiqu xinshiqi shidai kaoguxue wenhua zongheng (The length and breadth of the Neolithic archaeology cultures in Liaoxi area), in: Neimangu dongbuqu kaoguxue wenhua yanjiu wenji, Haiyangshan banshe, Beijing, pp. 9-14. Zhu Yanping, 1995, Xiajiadian xiaceng wenhua de shehui fazhan jieduan (Stages in the devel- opment of the Lower Xiajiadian culture), in: Zhongguo beifang gudai wenhua guoji xueshu yantaohui wenji (Su He, ed.), Zhongguo wenshi chubanshe, Beijing, pp. 103-109. Zhu Yonggang, 1987, Xiajiadian shangceng wenhua de chubu yanjiu (Research of the Up- per Xiajiadian culture), in: Kaoguxue wenhua lunji (Su Bingqi, ed.), Wenwu chubanshe, Beijing. 254 REFERENCES

Zou Heng, 1987, Zhongguo wenming de dansheng (The birth of Chinese civilization), Wenwu 12:69-74.

TITLES IN ENGLISH

Adams, R. McC., 1974, Anthropological Perspectives on Ancient Trade, Cuurrent Anthropology 15:239-258. Adams, R. McC., 1981, Heartlandof Cities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Agrawal, D. E, 1982, The Indian Bronze Age Cultures and Their MetalTechnology. Advances in World Archaeology 1:213-264. Algaze, G., 1993, Expansionary Dynamics of Some Early Pristine States, American Anthropol- ogists 92(2):304-333. Allan, S., 1984, The Myth of the Xia Dynasty, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 2:242-256. Ammerman, A. J., 1981, Surveys and Archaeological Research, Annual Review of Anthropol- ogy 10:63-88. An Zhimin, 1988, Archaeological Research on Neolithic China, Current Anthropology 29(5): 753-759. An Zhimin, 1989, Chinese Archaeology: Past and Present, Archaeological Review from Cam- bridge 8(1):12-18. Andersson, J. G., 1923, The Cave Deposit at Sha-kuo-tun in Ching-hsi, Fengtian, Palaeontologia Sinica ser. D, 1(1). Athens, J. S., 1977, Theory Building and the Study of Evolutionary Process in Complex Soci- eties, in: For Theory Building in Archaeology (L. R. Binford, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 353-384. Baker, E T., andW T. Sanders, 1972, Demographic Studies in Anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology 1 : 15 1 -178. Barfield, T. J., 1981, The Hsiung-nu Imperial Confederacy: Organization and Foreign Policy, Journal of Asian Studies 61(1):45-61. Barfield, T. J., 1989, The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, Oxford University Press, oxford. Berdan, E E, 1989, Trade and Markets in Precapitalist States, in: Economic Anthropology (S. Plattner, ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 78-107. Binford, L. R., 1972, An Archaeological Perspective, Seminar Press, New York. Bintliff, J., 1997, Regional Survey, Demography, and the Rise of Complex Societies in the An- cient Agean: Core-Periphery, Neo-Malthusian, and Other Interpretive Models, Journal of Field Archaeology 24: 1-38. Blanton, R. E., J. Apple, L. Feinsten, S. A. Kowalewski, G. M. Feinman, and E. Fisch, 1979, Re- gional Evolution in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico, Journal of Field Archaeology 6 369-390. Blanton, R. E., G. M. Feinman, S. A. Kowalewski, and E N. Peregrine, 1996, A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization, Current Anthropology 37(1):1-14, Boserup, E., 1965, The Conditions of Agricultural Growth, Aldine, Chicago. Bourdieu, P., 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Braithwaite, M., 1984, Ritual and Prestige in the Prehistory of Wessex c. 2200-1400 BC: A New Dimention to the Archaeological Evidance, in: Ideology, Power and Prehistory (D. Miller and C. Tilley, eds.), Cambridge university Press, Cambridge, pp. 93- 110. Braun, D. P., 1979, Illinois Hopewell Burial Practices and Social Organization: A Reexamination of the Klunk-Gibson Mound Group, in: Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Confer- ence (D. S. Brose and N. Greber, eds.), Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio, pp. 66-79. REFERENCES 255

Bronitsky, G., 1984, “Banking” at Arroyo Hondo, New Mexico, A.D. 1300-1424, Research in Economical Anthropology 6:171-190. Brown, J. A., 1981, The Search for Rank in Prehistoric Burials, in: The Archaeology of Death (R. Chapman, I. Kinnes, and K. Randsborg, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25-37. Brumfiel, E. M., 1976, Regional Growth in the EasternValley of Mexico: ATest of the “Popula- tion Pressure” Hypothesis, in: The Early Mesoamerican Village (K. V. Flannery, ed.), Aca- demic Press, New York, pp. 234-249. Brumfiel, E. M., 1995, Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies: Comments, in: Het- erarchy and theAnalysis of Complex Societies (R. M. Ehrenreich, C. L. Crumley, and J. E. Levy, eds.), Papers of the American Anthropological Association (6), Arlington, Virginia, pp. 125-131. Brumfiel, E. M., 1996, Comments, Current Anthropology 37(1):48-50. Bunker, E. C., 1990, Ancient Ordos Bronzes, in: Ancient Chinese and Ordos Bronzes (J. Raw- son and E. C. Bunker, eds.), The Royal Asiatic Ceramic Society, Hong Kong, pp. 291-307. Bunker, E. C., 1997, Ancient Bronzes of the Eastern Eurasian Steppes from the Arthur M. Sackler Collections, Arthur M. Sackler Foundation, New York. Carneiro, R. L., 1970, ATheory of the Origins of the State, Science 169:733-738. Carneiro, R. L., 1981, The Chiefdom: Precursor of the State, in: The Transition to Statehood in the New World (G. Jones and R. Kautz, eds.), Cambridge university Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 37-79. Cashdan, E., 1989, Hunters and Gatherers: Economic Behavior in Bands, in: Economic An - thropology (S. Plattner, ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 21-48. Caspary, W. R., 1993, New Psychoanalytic Perspectives on the Causes of War, Political Psy- chology 14(3):417-446. Casselberry, S. E., 1974, Further Refinement of Formulae for Determining Population from Floor Area, Word Archaeology 6(1):117-122. Champion, T. C., 1989, Introduction, in: Center and Periphery (T. C. Champion, ed.), Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 1-21. Chang, C., and H. A. Koster, 1986, Beyond Bones: Toward an Archaeology of Pastoralism, in: Advances In Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 9 (M. B. Schiffer, ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 97-148. Chang, K. C., 1981, Archaeology and Chinese Historiography, World Archaeology 13(2): 156-168. Chang, K. C., 1983a, Art, Myth, and Ritual, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachu- setts, and London. Chang, K. C., 1983b, Sandai Archaeology and the Formation of States in Ancient China, in: The Origins of Chinese Civilization (D. Keightley, ed.), University of California Press, Berke- ley, pp. 459-522. Chang, K. C., 1986, The Archaeology of Ancient China, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, and London. Chang, K. C., 1989, Ancient China and Its Anthropological Significance, in: Archaeological Thought in America (C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge and New York, pp. 155-166. Chen Chun, 1989, Chinese Archaeology and the West, Archaeological Review from Cam- bridge 8(1): 27-35. Cheng, T. K., 1978, Some New Discoveries in Prehistoric and Shang China, in: Ancient China; Studies in Early Civilization (D. J. Roy and T. H. Tsien, eds.), The Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, pp. 1-12. Childs-Johnson, E., 1991, of the Hongshan Culture: The Dragon and Fertility Cult Wor- ship, Arts Asiatique 46:82-95. 256 REFERENCES

Cohen, M. N., 1989, Paleopathology and the Interpretation of Economic Change in Prehistory, in: Archaeological Thought in America (C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, ed.), Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 117-132. Cohen, R., and E. R. Service (eds.), 1978, Origins of the State: The Anthropology of Political Evolution, Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Philadelphia. Cowgill, G. L., 1975, On Causes and Consequences of Ancient and Modern Population Changes, American Anthropologist 77:505-525. Cowgill, G. L.,1996, Comments, Current Anthropology 37(1):52-53. Cribb, R., 1984, Computer Simulation of Herding Systems as an Interpretive and Heuristic De- vice in the Study of Kill-off Strategies, in: Animals and Archaeology: Early Herders and Their Flocks (J. Clutton-Brock and C. Grigson, eds.), BAR International Series No. 202, Ox- ford, pp. 161-170. Cribb, R., 1991, Nomads in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Crumley, C. L., 1995, Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, in: Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies (R. M. Ehrenreich, C. L. Crumley, andJ. E. Levy, eds.), Papers of the American Anthropological Association (6), Arlington, Virginia, pp. 1-6. D’Altroy, T. N., 1996, Comments, Current Anthropology 37(1):55-56. D’Altroy, T. N., and Earle, T. K., 1985, Staple Finance, Wealth Finance, and Storage in the Inca Political Economy, Current Anthropology 2:187-206. Davis, S., 1984, The Advent of Milk and Wool Production in Western Iran: Some Speculation, in: Animal andArchaeology: Early Herders and Their Flocks (J. Clutton-Brock and C. Grig- son, eds.), BAR International Series No. 202, Oxford, pp. 265-278. DeMarrais, E., L. J. Castillo, and T. Earle, 1996, Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies, Current Anthropology 37(1):15-32. Di Cosmo, N., 1994, Ancient Inner Asian Nomads: Their Economic Basis and Its Significance in Chinese History, Journal of Asian Studies 53(4):1092-1126. Drennan, R. D., 1984, Long-Distant Transport Costs in Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerica, American Anthropologist 86:105-112. Drennan, R. D., 1987, Regional Demography in Chiefdoms, in: Chiefdoms in the Americas (R. D. Drennan and C. A. Uribe, eds.), University Press of America, Lanham, MaryIand, pp. 307-324. Drennan, R. D., 1992, What Is the Archaeology of Chiefdoms About?, in: Metaarchaeology: Re- flections by Archaeologists and Philosophers (L. Embree, ed.), Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 53-74. Drennan, R. D., and C. A. Uribe (eds.), 1987, Chiefdoms in the Americas, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland. Dull, J. L., 1990, The Evolution of Government in China, in: Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization (P. S. Ropp, ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 55-87. Durrant, S. W., 1995, The Cloudy : Tension and Conflict in the Writings of Sima Qian, State University of New York Press, Albany Earle, T. K., 1977, A Reappraisal of Redistribution: Complex Hawaiian Chiefdoms, in: Exchange Systems in Prehistory (T. K. Earle and J. E. Ericson, eds.), Academic Press, NewYork, pp. 213-229. Earle, T. K., 1987, Chiefdoms in Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Perspective, Annual Re- view of Anthropology 16:279-308. Earle, T. K, 1991, The Evolution of Chiefdoms, in: Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology (T. K. Earle, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and NewYork, pp. 1-15. Ekholm, K., 1978, External Exchange and theTransformation of Central African Social System, in: The Evolution of Social Systems (J. Friedman and M. J. Rowlands, eds.), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp, 263-287. REFERENCES 257

Engels, E, 1977, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, Pathfinder Press, NewYork. (Originally published 1884) Evans, S., and P. Gould, 1982, Settlement Models in Archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 : 275 -309. Fakenhausen, L. von., 1993, On the Historical Orientation of Chinese Archaeology, Antiquity 67:839-849. Falkenhausen, L. von., 1995, The Regionalist Paradigm in Chinese Archaeology, in: National- ism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology (P. Kohl and C. Fawcett, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and NewYork, pp. 198-217. Feinman, G. M., 1991, Demography, Surplus, and Inequality Early Political Formations in High- land Mesoamerica, in: Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology (T. K. Earle, ed.), Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge and NewYork, pp. 230-262. Feinman, G. M., and J. Neitzel, 1984, Too ManyTypes: An Overview of Sedentary Prestate So- cieties in the Americas, in: Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 7 w. B. Schiffer, ed.), Academic Press, NewYork, pp. 39-102. Feinman, G. M., and L. M. Nicholas, 1992, Pre-Hispanic Interregional Interaction in Southern Mexico: TheValley of Oaxaca and the EjutlaValley, in: Resources, Power, and Interaction (E. M. Schortman and P. A. Urban, eds.), Plenum Press, NewYork and London, pp 75-116. Finkelstein, I., and A. Prevolotsky, 1989, Processes of Sedentarization and Nomadization in the History of the Negev and Sinai (Hebrew), Cathedra 52:3-36. Flannery, K. V., 1972, The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:339-426. Frankenstein, S., and M. J. Rowlands, 1978, The Internal Srtucture and Regional Context of Early Iron Age Society in South-Western Germany, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 15173-112. Fried, M. H., 1967, The Evolution of Political Society, Random House, NewYork. Galvin, K. E, 1987, Forms of Finance and Forms of Production: The Evolution of Specialized Livestock Production in the , in: Specialization, Exchange, and Com- plex Societies (E. Brumfiel and T K. Earle, eds.),. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and NewYork, pp. 119-129. Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. Gilbert, A. S., 1983, On the Origins of Specialized Nomadic Pastoralism in Western Iran, World Archaeology 15(1): 105-1 18. Gilman, A., 1991, Trajectories towards Social Complexity in the Later Prehistory of the Mediter- ranean, in: Chiefdoms: Power; Economy, and Ideology (T. K. Earle, ed.), Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 146-168. Gilman, A., 1996, Comments, Current Anthropology 37(1):56-7. Guo Dasbun, 1995a, Hongshan and Related Cultures, in: The Archaeology of (S. M. Nelson, ed.),. Routledge, London and NewYork, pp. 21-64 Guo, Dasbun, 1995b, Lower Xiajiadian Culture, in: The Archaeology of Northeast China (S. M. Nelson, ed.), Routledge, London and New York, pp. 147-181. Guo, Dasbun, 1995c, “Northern Type” Bronze Artifacts Unearthed in the Liaoning Region, and Related Issues, in: The Archaeology of Northeast China (S. M. Nelson, ed.), Routledge, London and NewYork, pp. 182-205. Haas, J., 1982, The Evolution of the Prehistoric State, Press, New York. Hall, D. L., andAmes, R.T., 1995, Anticipating China, State University of New York Press, Albany. Hamada, K., and S. Mizuno, 1938, Chifeng Hongshanhou, Archaeologia Orientalis, ser. A, 6, Far Eastern Archaeology Society of Japan, Tokyo. 258 REFERENCES

Hastorf, C. A., 1991, Gender, Space, and Food in Prehistory, in: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey, eds.), Basil and Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 132-159. Hodder, I., 1986, Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hodder, I. (ed.), 1978, The Spatial Organization of Culture, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Horwitz, L. K., and E. Tchernov, 1989, Animal Exploitation in the Early Bronze Age of the Southern Levant: An Overview, in: L’urbanisation de la Palestine a L’age du Bronze An - cien (P. Miroschedji, ed.), BAR International Series, 527, Oxford, pp. 279-296. Hosler, D. H., J. A. Sabloff, and D. Runge, 1977, Simulation Model Development: A Case Study of the Classic Maya Collapse, in: Social Processes in Maya prehistory (N. Hammond, ed.), Academic Press, NewYork and London, pp. 553-590. Hsu Cho-Yun, 1965, Ancient China in Pansition, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Hsu Cho-Yun, 1986, Historical Conditions of the Emergence and Crystallization of the Confu- cian System, in: The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations (S. N. Eisenstadt , ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 306-324. Hsu Cho-Yun, and K. M. Linduff, 1988, Western Chou Civilization, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, and London. Huang Tsui-Mei, 1992, Liangzhu—A Late Neolithic Jade-Yielding Culture in Southestern Coastal China, Antiquity 6675-83. Johnson, G. A., 1977, Aspects of Regional Analysis in Archaeology, Annual Review of Anthro- pology 6:479-508. Johnson, G. A., 1980, Spatial Organization of Early Uruk Settlement Systems, in: Colloques In- ternationaux du C. N. R. s. No. 580 L’Archeologie de I’ lraq: Perspectives et Limites de L’ lnterpretation Anthropologique des Documents (M. T. Barrelet, ed.), C. N. R. S, Paris, pp. 233-263. Judge, J. W., J. I. Ebert, and R. K. Hitchcock, 1975, Sampling in Regional Archaeological Survey, in: Sampling in Archaeology (J. W. Mueller, ed.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 82-122. Keightley, D. N., 1990, Early Civilization in China: Reflections on How It Became Chinese, in: Heritage of China, P. S. Ropp, ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford,, pp. 15-54. Khazanov, A. M., 1983, Nomads and the Outside World, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge and NewYork. Kirch, P. V., 1988, Circumscription Theory and Sociopolitical Evolution in Polynesia, American Behavioral Scientist 31:416-427. Kohl, P. L., 1987a, The Ancient Economy, Transferable Tecdhnologies and the Bronze Age World- System: A View from the Northeastern Frontier of the Ancient Near East, in: Center and Periphery in the Ancient World (M. Rowlands, M. Larsen, and K. Kristiansen, eds.), Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 13-24. Kohl, P. L., 1987b, The Use and Abuse of World Systems Theory: The Case of the Pristine West Asian State, in: Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11 (M. B. Schiffer, ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 1-35. Kolb, C. C., 1985, Demographic Estimations in Archaeology: Contributions from Ethnoarchae- ology on Mesoamerican Peasants, Current Anthropology 26(5):581-59 9, Kowalewski, S. A., 1990, Merits of Full-Coverage Survey: Examples from the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico, in: The Archaeology of Regions (S. K. Fish and S. A. Kowalewski, eds.), Smith- sonian Institution Press, Washington and London, pp. 33-85. REFERENCES 259

Kowalewski, S. A., and S. K. Fish, 1990, Conclusions, in: The Archaeology of Regions (S. K. Fish and S. A. Kowalewski, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London, pp. 261-277. Kramer, C., 1979, An Archaeological View of a Contemporary Kurdish Village: Domestic Archi- tecture, Household Size and Wealth, in: Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography forArchaeology (C. Kramer, ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 139-163. Kristiansen, K., 1987, From Stone to Bronze: The Evolution of Social Complexity in Northern Europe 2300-1200 BC, in: Renking, Resource, and Exchange (T. Earle, ed.), Cambridge University Press Cambridge, pp. 30-51. Kristiansen, K., 1991, Chiefdom, State, and System of Social Evolution, in: Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology (T: K. Earle, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and NewYork, pp. 16-43. Kuhn, K. S., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Kus, S., 1989, Sensuous Human Activity and the State: Towards and Archaeology of Bread and Circuses, in: Dominations and Resistance (D. Miller, M. Rowlands, and C. Tilley, eds.), Routledge, London and NewYork, pp. 140-154. Lattimor, O., 1940, Inner Asian Frontiers of China, Oxford University Press, Oxford. LeBlanc, S., 1971, An Addition to Naroll’s Suggested Floor Area and Settlement Population Re- lationship, American Antiquity 36(2):210-211. Lees, S. H., and D. G. Bates, 1974, The Origins of Specialized Nomadic Pastoralism: A System- atic Model, American Antiquity 39(2): 187-193. Leone, J. W. G., 1984, Interpreting Ideology in Historical Archaeology: Using the Rules of Per- spective in the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland, in: Ideology, Power and Pre- history (D. Miller and C. Tilley, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp, 25-35. Levy, T. E., 1983-84, The Emergence of Specialized Pastoralism in the Southern Levant, World Archaeology 15:15-36. Levy, T. E., and S. Shalev, 1989. Prehistoric Metalworking in the Southern Levant, World Ar- chaeology 20(3): 3 52 -372. Lewis, B., 1975, Histo ry: Remembered, Recovered, Invented, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Li Xueqin, 1985, Eastern Zhou and Qin Civilizations, Yale University Press, New Haven, Con- necticut, and London. Lin Yun, 1986, A Reexamination of the Relationship between Bronzes of the Shang Culture and of the Northern Zone, in: Studies of ShangArchaeology (K. C. Chang, ed.), Yale Univer- sity Press, New Haven, Connecticut, and London, pp. 237-273. Linduff, K. M., 1995, Zhukaigou: Steppe Culture and the Rise of Chinese Civilization, Antiquity 69: 133-145. Linduff, K. M., 1997, Here Today and Gone Tomorrow: The Emergence and Demise of Bronze Producing Cultures Outside the Central Plain, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academica Sinica, Taipei. Linduff, K. M., 1996, Art and Identity: The Chinese andTheir “Significant Others” in theThird and Second Millennium BC, in: Cultural Contact: History and Ethnicity in Inner Asia (M. Gerveas and W. Schlepp, eds.), Toronto Studies in Central and Inner Asia, No. 2, Joint Center for Asia Pacific Studies, Toronto, pp. 12-48. Linduff, K. M., 1997, An Archaeological Overview, in: Ancient Bronzes of the Eastern Eurasian Steppes from the Arthur M. Sackler Collections (E. C. Bunker, ed.), Arthur M. Sackler Foundation, NewYork, pp. 18-98. Loewe, M., 1974, Crisis and Conflict in Han China: 104 BC to AD 9, George Allen and Unwin, London. 260 REFERENCES

Lowe, J. W. G., 1985, The Dynamic of Apocalypse: A System Simulation of the Classic Maya Collapse, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Marfoe, L., 1980, Book Review of The Rise of Urban Culture and Early Arad, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 39(4):315-322. McGuire, R. H., 1989, The Greater Southwest as a Pheiphery of Mesoamerica, in: Center and Periphery (T. C. Champion, ed.), Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 40-66. Naroll, R., 1962, Floor Area and Settlement Population, American Antiquity 27(4):587-589. Nelson, S. M., 1990, The Neolithic of Northeastern China and Korea, Antiquity 64:234-248. Nelson, S. M. (ed.), 1995a, The Archaeology of Northeast China, Routledge, London and New York. Nelson, S. M., 1995b, Ritualized Pigs and the Origins of Complex Society: Hypotheses Regard- ing the Hongshan Culture, Early China, 20:1-16. Olsen, J. W., 1987, The Practice of Archaeology in China Today, Antiquity 61:282-290 . O’Shea, J. M., 1984, Mortuary Variability: An Archaeological Investigation, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. Parsons, J. R., 1990, Critical Reflection on a Decade of Full-coverage Regional Survey in the Valley of Mexico, in: The Archaeology of Regions (S. K. Fish and S. A. Kowalewski, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London, pp. 7-31. Pauketat, T. R., 1992, The Reign and Ruin of the Lords of Cahokia: A Dialectic of Dominance, in: Lords of the Southeast: Social Inequality and Native Elites of Southeastern North America (A. W. Barker and T. R. Pauketat, eds.), Archeological Papers of the American An- thropological Association, No. 3, pp. 31-52. Payne, S., 1972, On the Interpretation of Bone Sample from Archaeological Sites, in: Papers in Economic Prehistory (E. S. Higgs, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 65-81. Peebles, C. S., and S. M. Kus, 1977, Some Archaeological Correlates of Ranked Societies, Amer- ican Antiquity 42:421-448. Plattner, S., 1989, Introduction, in: Economic Anthropology (S. Plattner, ed.), Stanford Univer- sity Press, Stanford, California, pp. 1-20. Plog, E, 1990a, Agriculture, Sedentism, and Environment in the Evolution of Political Systems, in: The Evolution of Political Systems: Sociopolitics in Small-Scale Sedentary Societies (S. Upham, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and NewYork, pp. 177-199. Plog, E, 1990b, SomeThoughts on Full-Coverage Surveys, in: The Archaeology of Regions (S. K. Fish and S. A. Kowalewski, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and Lon- don, pp. 243-248. Powell, M. L., 1992, In the Best of Health? Disease and Trauma among the Mississippian Elite, in: Lords of the Southeast: Social Inequality and Native Elites of Southeastern North America (A. W. Barker and T. R. Pauketat, eds.), Archeological Papers of the American An- thropological Association, No. 3, Washington, D.C., pp. 81-97. Prusek, J., 1971, Chinese Statelets and the Northern Barbarians in the Period 1400-300 B.C, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Read, D. W., 1986, Sampling Procedures for Regional Surveys: A Problem of Representatives and Effectiveness, Journal of Field Archaeology 13:478-491. Renfrew, C., 1974, Beyond a Subsistence Economy: The Evolution of Social Organization in Prehistoric Europe, in: Reconstructing Complex Societies (C. B. Moore, ed.), Supplement of the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research No. 20, pp. 69-84. Renfrew, C., 1977, Alternative Model for Exchange and Spatial Distribution, in: Exchange Sys - tems in prehistory (T. Earie and J. Ericson, eds.), Academic Press, NewYork, pp. 71-90. Renfrew, C., 1978, Space, Time and Polity, in: The Evolution of Social Systems (J. Friedman and M. J. Rowlands, eds.), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 89-112. REFERENCES 261

Renfrew, C., 1986, Introduction: Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, in: Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change (C. Renfrew and J. E Cherry, eds.), Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp, 1-18. Renfrew, C., and P. Bahn, 1996, Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice, 2nd ed., Thames and Hudson, London. Rosen, S. A., 1984, The Adoption of Metallurgy in the Levant: A Lithic Perspective, Current An- thrpology 25(4): 504- 5. Rosen, S. A., 1988, Notes on the Orgins of Pastoral Nomadism: A Case Study from the Negev and Sinai, Current Anthropology 29(3):498-506. Rowlands, M. J., 1987, Centre and Periphery: A Review of the Concept, in: Center and Pe- riphery in the Ancient World (M. Rowlands, M. Larsen, and K. Kristiansen, eds.), Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp. 1-11. Rowlands, M. J., 1989, A Question of Complexity, in: Domination and Resistance (D. Miller, M. Rowlands, and C. Tilley, eds.), Routledge, London and New York, pp. 28-40. Sabloff, J. A., 1990. The New Archaeology and the Ancient Maya, Scientific American Library NewYork. Sabloff, J. A., and D. Freidal, 1975, A Model of a Pre-ColombianTrading Center, in: Ancient Civ- ilization and Trade (J. Sabloff and C. C. Lamberg-Karlovse, eds.), University of New Mar- ico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 369-408. Sahlins, M., 1972, Stone-Age Economics, Aldine, Chicago. Salzman, E! A., 1980, Introduction: Processes of Sedentarization as Adaptation and Response, in: When Nomads Settle (P. A. Salzman, ed.), Praeger, NewYork, pp. 1-20. Sanders, W. T., and D. Webster, 1978, Unilinealism, Multilinealism, and the Evolution of Com- plex Societies, in: Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating (C. L. Redman, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 249-302. Santley, R. S., and R. T. Alexander, 1992, The Political Economy of Core-Periphery Systems, in: Resources, Power and Interaction (E. M. Schortman and E! A. Urban, eds.), Plenum Press, New York and London, pp 23-49. Schiffer, M. B., A. P. Sullivan, and T. C. Klinger, 1978, The Design of Archaeological Surveys, World Archaeology 10: 1-28. Schortman, E. M., and P. A. Urban, 1987, Modeling Interregional Interaction in Prehistory, in: Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11 (M. B. Schiffer, ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 37-95. Schortman, E. M., and P. A Urban., 1992a, Current Trends in Interaction Research, in: Re- sources, Power; and Interaction (E. M. Schortman and P. A. Urban, eds.), Plenum Press, NewYork and London, pp 235-255. Schortman, E. M., and P. A Urban, 1992b, The Place of Interaction Studies in Archaeological Thought, in: Resources, Power; and Interaction (E. M. Schortman and E A. Urban, eds.), Plenum Press, NewYork and London, pp 3-15. Sechin, J., and S. Van-Jay, 1989, Peace, War and Trade along the Great Wall, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. Service, E. R., 1962, Primitive Social Organization: An Evolutionary Perspective, Random House, New York. Shaughnessy, E. L., 1989, Historical Geography and the Extent of the Earliest Chinese King- doms, Asia Major 2(2):1-22. Shaughnessy, E. L., 1991, Sources of Western Zhou History, University of California Press, Berkeley. Shelach, G., 1994, Social Complexity in North China during the Early Bronze Age: A Compara- tive Study of the Erlitou and Lower Xiajiadian Cultures, Asian Petspectives 33(2):261-292. 262 REFERENCES

Shelach, G., 1996, The Qiang and the Question of Human Sacrifice in the Late Shang Period, Asian Perspectives 35(1):1-26. Shennan, S., 1982, Ideology, Change and the European Early Bronze Age, in: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (I. Hodder, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 155-161. Shennan, S., 1988, Quantifying Archaeology, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Shennan, S., 1989, Introduction:ArchaeologicalApproaches to Cultural Identity, in:Archaeologi- calApproaches to Cultural Identify (S. Shennan, ed.), Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 1-32. Shennan, S., 1993, After Social Evolution: A New Archaeological Agenda?, in: Archaeological Theory Who Sets the Agenda? (N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53-59. Sima Qian, 1969, Records of the Historian (B. Watson, trans.), Columbia University Press, New York and London. Small, D. B., 1995, Heterarchical Paths to Evolution: The Role of External Economies, in: Heterar- chy and the Analysis of Complex societies (R M. Ehrenreich, C. L. Crumley, and J. E. Levy, eds.), Papers of the American Anthropological Association (6), Arlington, Virginia, pp. 71-86. Smith, C. A., 1976a, Analyzing Regional Social Systems, in: Regional Analysis, Vol. 2 (C. A. Smith, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 3-20. Smith, C. A., 1976b, Regional Economic Systems: Linking Geographical Models and Socioeco- nomic Problems, in: Regional Analysis, Vol. 1 (C. A. Smith, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 3-63. Smith, G. E., 1923, The Ancient Egyptians and the Origin of Civilization, Harper, London. Spencer, C. S., 1987, Rethinking Chiefdom, in: Chiefdoms in the Americas (R. D. Drennan and C. A. Uribe, eds.), University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 369-389. Spencer, C. S., 1990, On theTempo and Mode of State Formation: Neoevolutionism Reconsid- ered, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9: 1-30. Spencer, C. S., 1993, Human Agency, Biased Transmission, and the Cultural Evolution of Chiefly Authority, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12:41-74. Steponaitis, V. E, 1978, Location Theory and Complex Chiefdoms: A Mississippian Example, in: Mississippian Settlement Patterns (B. D. Smith, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 417-453. Steponaitis, V. P., 1981, Settlement Hierarchies and Political Complexity in Nonmarket Soci- eties: The Formative Period of the Valley of Mexico, American Anthropologist 83: 320-363. Steponaitis, V. E, 1991, Contrasting Patterns of Mississippian Development, in: Chiefdoms: Power Economy, and Ideology (T. Earle, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 193-228. Sun Shuyun, and Han Rubin, 1983-1985, A Preliminary Study of Early Chinese Copper and Bronze Artifacts, Early China 9-10:261-289. Szynkiewicz, S., 1989, Interaction between the Nomadic Cultures of CentralAsia and China in the Middle Ages, in: Center and Periphery (T. C. Champion, ed.), Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 151-158. Tainter, J. A., 1988, The Collapse of Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Tan Qixiang, 1982, The HistoricaI Atlas of China, Cartographic Publishing House, Shanghai. Thorp, R. L., 1980-81, The Chinese Bronze Age from a Marxist Perspective, Early China 6:97-102. Thorp, R. L., 1991, Erlitou and the Search for the Xia, Early China 161-38. Trigger, B. G., 1968, Beyond History: The Methods of Prehistory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NewYork. REFERENCES 263

Trigger, B. G., 1989, A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge. Tsafrir, Y., and G. Foerster, 1992, From Byzantine Scythopolis to Arab Baysan—Changing Urban Concepts (Hebrew), Cathedra 64:3-30. Upham, S., 1987, ATheoretical Consideration of Middle Range Societies, in: Chiefdoms in the Americas (R. D. Drennan and C. A. Uribe, eds.), University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland. Wagner, M., 1993, Traces of Prehistoric Population and Desertification Processes in Horqin Grassland: An Approach to Environmental Archaeology, in: Proceedings of the Japan- China International Symposium on the Study of the Mechanism of Desertification (M. Ichikuni, ed.), Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 54-66. Wallerstein, I., 1974, The Modem World-System I, Academic Press, NewYork. Wallerstein, I., 1976, A World-System Perspective on the Social Sciences, British Journal of So- ciology 27(3): 343-352. Wallerstein, I., 1980. The Modern World-System II, Academic Press, NewYork. Wason, E W., 1994, The Archaeology of Rank, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Webster, G. S., 1990, Labor Control and Emergent Stratification in Prehistoric Europe, Current Anthropology 31(4): 337-366. Wheatley, E, 1971, The Pivot of the Four Quarters, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. White, J. C., 1995, Incorporating Heterarchy into Theory of Socio-Political Development: The Case for Southeast Asia, in: Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies (R. M. Ehrenreich, C. L. Crumley, and J. E. Levy, eds.), Papers of the American Anthropological Association (6), Arlington, Virginia, pp. 101-124. Whitecotton, J. W., 1992, Culture and Exchange in Postclassic Oaxaca: A Word-System Per- spective, in: Resources, Power; and Interaction (E. M. Schortman and E A. Urban, eds.), Plenum Press, NewYork and London, pp 51-74. Wiessner, E, 1989, Style and Changing Relations between the Individual and Society, in: The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression (I. Hodder, ed,), Harper- Collins Academic, London, pp. 57-63. Wobst, M. H., 1977, Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange, in: For the Director: Re- search Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin (C. Cleland, ed.), University of Michigan Mu- seum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers 61, Ann Arbor, pp. 317-342. Wright, H. T., 1978, Toward an Explanation of the Origin of the State, in: Origins of the State (R. Cohen and R. Service, eds.), ISHI, Philadelphia, pp. 49-68. Wright, H. T., 1986, The Evolution of Civilizations, in: D. J. Meltzer, American Archaeology Past and Future (D. D. Fowler and J. A. Sabloff, eds.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Wash- ington and London, pp. 323-365. Wright, H. T., and G. A. Johnson, 1975, Population, Exchange, and Early State Formation in Southwestern Iran, American Anthropologist 77: 267-289. Wu Rukang, and J. W Olsen, 1985, Paleoanthropology and Palaeolithic Archaeology in the People’s Republic of China, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. Yin Weichang, 1986, A Reexamination of Er-Li-Tou Culture, in: Studies of Shang Archaeology (K. C. Chang, ed.), Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, and London, pp. 1-13. Yoffee, N., 1993,Too Many Chiefs? (or, SafeTexts for the ’90s), in: Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? (N. Yoffee andA. Sherratt, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 60-78. Yoffee, N., and A. Sherratt, 1993, Introduction: The Source of Archaeological Theory, in: Ar- chaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? (N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-9. Index

Active agency theory, 1 Animal husbandry (cont.) Adaptation, 11, 16 in Xinglongwa culture, 53-54 Affiliations in Zhaobaogou culture, 53-54 lineage, 2 Animal motifs, of artifacts social, 3, 18 Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 156-157, 162- Agricultural societies, Chinese 163 historiographic view of, 52-53 Zhaobaogou, 54 Agriculture Animals, see also Animal husbandry; of Chinese states, 220 Bones, of animals; specific types environmental effects of, 70 of animals of Erlitou culture, 206 grazing, see also Herding of Hongshan culture, 52, 79, 83, 181, 184 in Upper Xiajiadidn culture, 162, 163 of Longshan culture, 206 religious significance of, in Upper of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 52, 119- Xiajiadian culture, 163 120, 122, 128, 181, 184,232 Anyang, 49, 224n catchment analysis of, 126-135 Aohan, 70, 71 n, 76, 121 relationship to pastoral nomadism, 5, Archaeology 194- 199, 22 1-222 Chinese: see Chinese archaeology in socially-complex societies, 192 “new,” 10, 16, 25-26; see also in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 52, 153, Processual archaeology 161, 163, 181, 184, 194, 232 Architecture, see also Ceremonial struc- in Xinglongwa culture, 53-54 tures; Houses; Temples in Zhaobaogou culture, 53-54 monumental Altars, of Hongshan burial sites, 82-83, 86n construction of, 13-14 Andersson, John, 48, 55 Hongshan, 84 Animal husbandry Lower Xiajiadian, 89 in Erlitou culture, 206 relationship to group-oriented societ- in Hongshan culture, 52 ies, 32-33 in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 52, 120 Arrowheads in Northeast China cultures, 220 bone in specialized pastoral societies, 71n Lower Xiajiadian, 109, 120 in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 161-163, Upper Xiajiadian, 154-155, 163 164, 194, 218 bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 163, 168

265 266 Index

Arrowheads (cont.) Bones, of animals (cont.) flint, Lower Xiajiadian, 106, 120 from Lower Xiajiadian sites, 110, 112, as grave goods, 109, 167, 168, 169, 170 113-114, 120, 167, 168, 169 Lower Xiajiadian, 106, 109, 120 from Upper Xiajiadian sites, 146, 162, 163 stone, Upper Xiajiadian, 163 Bronze Age cultures, of Wessex, England, Upper Xiajiadian, 153, 154-155 32-33 as grave goods, 167, 168, 169, 170 Bronze artifacts Awls, bronze, Erlitou, 207 Central European, 29 Axes Chinese bronze comparison with Northern Corridor Erlitou, 207 bronze artifacts, 155- 158 as grave goods, 155 differentiated from Upper Xiajiadian from Northern Corridor sites, 157 bronzes, 176n Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 156 as Upper Xiajiadian grave goods, 43, Lower Xiajiadian, 105, 108 166, 167, 168, 171, 172, 173, socketed, Weiyingzi, 196 214-216,217-220, 221 stone utilitiarian and ritualistic uses of, 38 as grave goods, 108, 112-114, 120 ding-type, 107, 217 Hongshan, 77 Erlitou, 139n, 202, 206 Lower Xiajiadian, 105, 108 as grave goods Upper Xiadiajian, 155, 156, 161 as indicators of interregional interac- tion, 214-216, 217-220 Ban Gu, 45n from Upper Xiajiadian sites, 155, Basalt artifacts, 105, 106, 176n 158-160, 166, 167, 168, 170, Beads, as Upper Xiajiadian grave goods, 174, 214-216, 217-220 113-114, 155, 168-169 during Zhou dynasty, 217 Behavior, universal patterns of, 6 Lower Xiajiadian, 101, 106-108, 139n, Beijing-Tianjin plain, 57 155 Beit-Shean, Israel, 13-14, 40, 45n from Northern Corridor sites, 155- 158 Bells, bronze, 207 northern-type, 158-159, 173, 196, 222 Belt buckles, bronze, 157 of Ordos region, 159, 176n Bi (jade artifact), 80-81 use in religious rituals, 214 Binford, Lewis, 25 Shang, 57, 207, 223n Blades, see also Daggers; Knives Upper Xiajiadian, 155-161, 166, 167, stone, Upper Xiajiadian, 153 168, 170, 176n, 214-216, 217- Boas, Franz, 26 220 Bone, chemical analysis of, 238, 240-241 yan-type, 107 Bone artifacts Zhou, 37 Lower Xiajiadian, 101, 120 Bronze industry as grave goods, 108, 109, 112, 113 Erlitou, 206 Upper Xiajiadian, 154- 1 55,160- 161,163 Lower Xiajiadian, 55 as grave goods, 167, 169, 170 Upper Xiajiadian, 55, 143, 144, 164 Bone industry Bronze metallurgy, development of, 46n Lower Xiajiadian, 109, 120 Burial sites, see also Grave goods Upper Xiajiadian, 154 of children, 114, 115 Bone ornaments, Upper Xiajiadian, as correlation with sociopolitical ideology, grave goods, 168 32-33 Bones, of animals Erlitou, 206 use in divination: see Oracle bones Hongshan, 74, 79-83, 86n, 87n from Hongshan sites, 79 of Liao upper class, 180-181 Index 267

Burial sites (cont.) Center-periphery model, of interregional Lower Xiajiadian, 60, 89, 101, 110-115 interaction, 199-200, 212-213, animal remains in, 110, 112, 113-114 214, 220-221 comparison with Erlitou burial sites, 208 economic exploitation concept of, 19- grave goods, 107- 108 20, 21 pit graves, 110, 11 1 Central Europe, bronze artifacts of, 29 pollen analysis of, 69 Central-place model, of sociopolitical or- as social stratification indicator, 208 ganization, 121-122 suggestions for future research into, Ceramics 238 Erlitou, as grave goods, 206 male graves, 173, 177n Hongshan, 57, 76, 77, 80, 86, 101, 104 pit graves li tripods, 209, 120 Lower Xiajiadian, 110, 11 1 Lower Xiajiadian, 101-105, 139n Upper Xiajiadian, 149, 217 differentiated from Upper Xiadiajian stamped-earth construction of, 216-217 ceramics, 151-152 Upper Xiajiadian, 60, 144, 146, 148, fast-wheel production of, 120 149, 150-151 as grave goods, 102-103, 104, 108, factor analysis of, 167-171, 175, 177n 112, 113, 140n, 208 female graves, 173, 177n homogeneity of style, 187 intensity of labor investment in, 166, polychrome, 103, 137-138, 139n 167-168, 170-171, 219 Upper Xiajiadian, 151-153, 164 K-means cluster analysis of, 171 differentiated from Lower Xiajiadian of leaders, 216-220 ceramics, 151-152 male graves, 173, 177n heterogeneity of style of, 187 pollen analysis of, 70 Xiaoheyan, 85-86 as social status indicators, 239-241 Zhaobaogou, 54 Buttons, bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 155 Ceremonial buildings/structures Lower Xiajiadian, 89, 123, 140n Cairns, burial, 80, 82-83 at Yinxu, 49 Capitalism, 11, 19-20, 34, 45n,46n Chalandriani cemetery, Syros, 177n Casting molds, Upper Xiajiadian, 160, Change 161, 176n cognitive, 4 Catchment analysis sociopolitical: see Sociopolitical of Lower Xiajiadian sites, 116, 124-135, change 137, 140-141n Changping Baifu site, 158- 159 of Mesopotamian sites, 126 Changzishan site, 80 of Mexican sites, 130, 13 1 Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de, 48 Cattle, bones of Chariot fittings, bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, from Erlitou sites, 206 168 from Lower Xiajiadian sites, 120 Chichen Itza, 13 Cemeteries Chicken bones, from Erlitou sites, 206 Chalandriani, Syros, 177n Chiefdoms Erlitou, 206 definition of, 223-224n Lower Xiajiadian, 60, 110-115, 150; see of Hawaiian Islands. 22, 31-32 also Dadianzi site individualizing, 174-175, 219 age groupings of, 1 14, 115 of Pacific Islands, 22 femalegraves, 110, 112-113, 115 Chifeng area, 53-60; see also Hongshan malegraves, 110, 112-113, 115 sites; Lower Xiajiadian sites; Upper Xiajiadian, 60, 144, 148-151, Upper Xiajiadian sites 162, 239-240 chronology of, “53-57, 185-186 268 Index

Chifeng area (cont.) Climatic change, influence on emergence diachronic phases of, 5; see also of pastoral nomadism, 195-196 Diachronic analysis Cluster analysis, 169- 170: see also Factor field research in, 60-67 analysis geographic and climatic background Coalitions, 3, 32 of, 63-64, 67-70, 71n Coffins methodology, 61 -63 Erlitou, 206 interregional interactions in, 24-25 Lower Xiajiadian, 110, 113- 114 location of, 52, 67 Upper Xiajiadian. 151, 167, 168, 171 paleoenvironment and paleoclimate of, Collapse, social, 12, 13-14 69-70, 71n Conflict, relationship to population den- sociopolitical changes in, 40 sity, 192 sociopolitical entities of, 231-232 Confucianism, 27-28, 46n, 223n sociopolitical organization of, 44 Constitution of Society (Giddens), 10- 11 suggestions for future research in, 234- Copper ore mines, Upper Xiajiadian, 160- 241 161 synchronic phases of, 5, 185-186 Core-periphery relations, between agricul- trade relations of, 121 tural and pastoral societies, 52-53 Chifeng city, Upper Xiajiadian grave exca- Corporate power strategy, 33-34, 189 vations near, 150- 151 Court rituals, use of bronze vessels in, 206 Chijiaying site, 97 Courtyards, 99 Chijiaying village, 63 Craft specialization Children, Lower Xiajiadian burial sites of, in Erlitou culture, 206-207 114, 115 in Hongshan culture, 83, 235 Chime stones, 140n in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 109, 120- China, see also Specific geographic re- 121 gions in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 161, 164 for, 199 Critical theory, 1 communist regime of, 49 Culture(s) Japanese invasion and occupation of, archaeological, 209 49, 55 boundaries of, 18-19 Northeast: see Northeast China interregional interactions of, 2 12 Chinese, common identity of (Huaxia), prehistoric ethnic groups associated 215-214, 221-222 with, 50, 58, 60, 71n Chinese archaeology, 47-71 Chinese vs. Western models of, 19 artifacts orientation of, 50, 51, 57, 60, 228 postprocessual view of, 26 Chinese versus Western concept of, 47 processual view of, 25 development of, 48-53 Cybernetics theory, 4 ethnocentric and geocentric approach of, 45n, 47, 58, 199-200 Dadianzi site, 60, 89, 110-115, 139n, 150, historical orientation of, 49, 50, 52-53, 208,238 71n, 228 grave goods, 108, 121, 186, 209 Marxist orientation of, 5 1 pollen analysis of, 69, 70 influence of nationalism on, 49-50 Dagger-axes, Lower Xiajiadian, 106 site-anticipation approach of, 50, 56- Daggers, bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 134, 57, 58, 71n 155, 156, 168, 218 Chisels, bronze Daguangan mountain range, 67 Erlitou, 207 Dajing site, 160-161 Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 168 Damiao village, 63, 68 Chutoulan village, 63, 68 Darwinian evolution. 10 Index 269

Deer bones, from Lower Xiajiadian sites, Division of labor (cont.) 120 world system model of, 20 Defense systems Dogs, bones of of Lower Xiajiadian sites, 54-55, 91-95, from Erlitou sites, 206 96, 123, 131-132, 190, 208 from Lower Xiajiadian sites, 120 craft specialization and, 120 Dongbajiasite, 97, 99-100, 139n rammed-earth techique of, 210 Donghu confederacy, 180 relationship to burial sites, 110 Dongmagou site, 206 site locations of, 115-116, 117-118 Dongnangou site, 151 site size and, 131-132 Dongshanzui site, 83 social stratification and, 123 Dong Zhongshu, 28 watchtowers of, 210 Dragon, as motif, 82, 210 of Upper Xiadiajian sites, 138-139n Dragon masks, 209 Dengfeng, 204 Di, 218 Earrings, Lower Xiajiadian, 106, 107, 108- Diachronic analysis, of processes in the 109, 140n Chifeng area and northeast Economic activity/systems, prehistoric, China, 185-225 see also Agriculture; Animal hus- emergence of pastoralism, 193- 199 bandry; Herding ideology and sociopolitical change, formalist and substantivist views of, 34- 188-192 39 interregional interaction and social as function of sociopolitical structure, change, 199-222 193-194 during Lower Xiajiadian period, 200- Endogenous influences, on sociopolitical 212 processes, 16, 17-18 during Upper Xiajiadian period, 212- Engels, Friedrich, 25, 51 222 Erligang phase, of . 205 population aggregation and political hi- Erlitou culture, 107, 201 erarchy, 192-193 craft specialization in, 206-207 Dichotomies, in archaeology, 1-2, 3, 9-46 interregional interactions of, 207-209 ideology-related, 2 5 - 30 polities of, 2 12 of indigenous processes vs. external in- public buildings of, 208 fluence, 16-25 social complexity of, comparison with leadership-related, 3 1-34 Lower Xiajiadian culture, 202, prehistoric economies-related, 34-39 206-212 processual versus postprocessual, 9 Erlitou site, 201 social evolution-related, 10- 15 bronze artifacts of, 139n, 212 Dietary analysis, of skeletal remains, 238, burial site, 206 240-241 internal organization of, 204-205, 206- Diffusion, 10, 16-17, 18, 23 207 Disks, decorative size, 204 bronze Ethnocentrism, 10 Erlitou, 207 of Chinese archaeology, 45n, 47, 48, Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 156, 157 58, 199-200 stone, Hongshan, 77 Exchange networks, 5, 35, 221 Divination: see Oracle bones Exogenous influences, on sociopolitical Division of labor processes, 16-18 in Hongshan culture, 235 Exploitation in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 120 by leadership, 31-32 in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 161, 164 Marxist theory of, 25 270 Index

Factor analysis Grave goods (cont.) of Lower Xiajiadian burials, 108, 114- Upper Xiajiadian, 151, 153, 154, 155, 115 164-176 of Upper Xiajiadian burial sites, 167- factor analysis of, 167-171, 175 171, 175 as indicator of interregional interac- Fanzhangzi site, 110, 114, 140n tion, 214-220 Fengxia site, 98, 120, 139n as prestige objects, 43, 164-175, Feudalism, as evolutionary stage, 11 219 Figurines, life-size clay, 54, 57, 83 sociopolitical implications of, 164- Fish bones, from Upper Xiajidian sites, 163 176 Fishing, 163 Graves: see Burial sites Flint artifacts Greece, ancient, 22, 34, 45n Hongshan, 78, 79, 106 Grinding stones Lower Xiajiadian, 106, 120 Hongshan, 77 Upper Xiajiadian, 106, 153 Lower Xiajiadian, 106 Formalist theory, of economic systems, Upper Xiajiadian, 153, 154, 161 34, 35-37, 38-39 Group affiliations, 3; see also Ideology, Frontiers, differentiated from peripheries, grouporiented 45n Fuhe culture, 54, 109 Habitation sites: see Houses and habita- Funerary treatment, see also Burial sites; tion sites Grave goods Han dynasty, 45n, 64, 198 in Hongshan society, 83-84 Confucian ideology of, 27-28 Harris, Marvin, 45n , 143 Hawaiian Islands, chiefdoms of, 22, 31- Glossary 32 of Chinese journals, 246 Hebei Province, 57, 208, 209 of Chinese terms, 243-246 Heilongjiang Province, 180 Goats, bones of Helmets, bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 155, from Erlitou sites, 206 168 from Lower Xiajiadian sites, 120 Henan Province, 217 from Upper Xiajiadian sites, 162 Herding Goddess Temple of Liaoning, 83, 84, 186 in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 120, 196 Gold artifacts in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 162, 240 Lower Xiajiadian, 107, 108 Heterarchy, 15 Upper Xiajiadian, 167, 168 Hierarchy Grain production, 197-198 in Hongshan culture, 84 Grave goods sociopolitical of Chinese origin, as evidence of inter- finance strategies of, 36-39 regional interaction, 214-220 horizontal processes in, 12-13 Erlitou, 206 in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 91, 124, Liao, 180-181 137, 138 Lower Xiajiadian, 102-104, 107-108, succession of, 83-84 112-115, 120 Historiography of burials, 108, 114-115 Chinese, 199-201 as indicator of interregional interac- as ideology, 28 tion, 208 Hoes lacquer artifacts, 109 Hongshan, 77 as prestige objects, 112, 114-115, Lower Xiajiadian, 105 138-139 Upper Xiajiadian, 161 Index 271

Hongshan culture, 73-87 Houses and habitation sites (cont.) agriculture in, 52, 83, 79, 181, 184 Lower Xiajiadian, 74, 95-101 chronology of, 54, 55-56, 185-186 defense systems of, 123, 131-132, 190 collective ideology of, 84 homogeneity of style of, 187 hunting in, 79 as indicators of social status, 99, 100, as indigenous culture, 84 123-124, 125, 186, 238 jade industry of, 54, 73, 83 lack of data about, 60 effect of migration on, 209-210 proximity to Upper Xiajiadian ceme. religious leadership of, 190 teries, 150 ritualistc structures of, 186 stone houses, 74 settlement patterns of, 73-79, 183-184, survey methodology for, 65 186 mud brick, 146 social complexity of, 54, 83-84 semisubterranean, 146 sociopolitical organization of Upper Xiajiadian, 144, 146-147 public ceremonial basis of, 186, 235 Hu, 218 suggestions for future research into, Huang (jade artifact), 80-81 235-236 Huaxia, 213-214, 221-222 transition to Lower Xiajiadian culture, Hui, King of Liang, 233 104 Hunting Hongshan sites in Hongshan culture, 79 altitude above sea level, 194 in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 120 burial sites, 74, 79-83, 86n, 87n in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 162- 163 Changzishan site, 80 Hutougou site, 80, 83 distance from closest water source, 194 Hyperdiffusionists, 17 distance from Yinhe River, 194 distribution of, 75 Identity, Chinese (Huaxia), 213-214, Dongshanzui site, 83 221-222 habitation sites, 74, 76-79. 86n. 235- Ideology 236 as active factor or epi-phenomenon, Japanese-supervised excavations of, 55 25-30 Niuheliang site, 235 Confucian, 27-28, 46n, 223n number 49, 76, 236 Daoist, 27 number 52, 80 definition of, 27 number 169, 86n group-oriented, 33-34, 188-189 number 170, 86n of Hongshan culture, 84 ritual, 79-80, 82-83, 235 of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 30, 138,232 surface visibility of, 74 relationship to monumental architec- Hooks ture construction, 23-33 bone, Lower Xiajiadian, 109 stylistic expression of, 187 bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 155 transition to individualizing ideology, Horizontal processes, in sociopolitical hi- 232-233 erarchy, 12-13 individualizing, 33-34, 40-41, 188- Horse fittings, bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 189, 219 155, 162 of the Inca, 44 Horses of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 232 as exchange goods, 220, 221 prestige artifacts and, 219-220 in Upper Xiajiadidn culture, 162, 177n relationship to interregional interac- Houses and habitation sites tions, 41 Erlitou, 205 stylistic expression of, 187 Hongshan, 74, 76-79, 86n, 235-236 of Upper Xiajiadian culture, 191 272 Index

Ideology (cont.) Jiang clan, 217, 218, 224n Legalist, 27 Jilin Province, 180 processual analysis of, 4 relationship to leadership strategy, 188- Kalaqin site, 98 192 Kinship, in nomadic pastoral societies, relationship to sociopolitical change, 233 26-30, 188-192 K-means cluster analysis, of Upper Inca, 36-37, 44 Xiajiadian burial sites, 171 Indigenous processes, versus external in- Knives fluences, 1, 16-25 bone Inner Mongolia Lower Xiajiadian, 109 bronze artifacts from, 143 Upper Xiajiadian, 154- 155 Chinese expansion into, 180 bronze Interregional interaction Chinese/Northern Corridor compari- center-periphery model of, 199-200, son of, 155-156 212-213, 214, 220-221 Erlitou, 207 as continuing process, 186 as prestige objects, 218 foreign artifacts as evidence of, 43 Upper Xiajiadian, 143, 155, 156, 168, giving of presents as, 218 218 intensive, 43 reaping, Upper Xiajiadian, 153 at local level, 23 stone of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 200-212, 232 Hongshan, 77, 79 with Erlitou culture, 207-209 Lower Xiajiadian, 105 migration and, 209-210 Weiyingzi, 196 mechanisms of, 22-23 Kongo, 37 nature of, 22 Kongzi, 46n in Neolithic China, 228-229 Kosaku, Hamada, 55, 56 in Northeast China, 199-222 in pastoralist societies, 198 Lacquer artifacts peer-polity theory of, 21-22, 23 Erlitou, 207 relationship to individualizing ideology, 41 Lower Xiajiadian, 109, 112, 121, 208 relationship to shared cultural traits, Lacquered coffins, Erlitou, 206 212 Laoha River, 67, 68, 70 relationship to social stratification, 233 Laws, universal, 1 relationship to sociopolitical strategy Lead artifacts, Lower Xiajiadian, 107- 108 development, 190 Leader-chief system, nonmarket, 121 research issues in, 22-23, 42-43 Leadership of Upper Xiajiadian culture, 232 corporate power strategy of, 33-34 Irrigation systems, management of, 46n in Hongshan culture, 83-84 Islam, 13-14, 40 in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 236 Israel, Beit-Shean site, 13-14, 40, 45n managerial vs. exploitative, 31-34, 46n network power strategy of, 33-34 Jade artifacts relationship to ideology of Erlitou, 206, 207 sociopolitical organization, 5, Hongshan, 57, 80-82, 210 33-34, 138, 175-176, 188-192, Lower Xiajiadian, 108, 113 232-233 Jade industry, Hongshan, 54, 73, 83 in Upper Xiajiadian culture Japan, invasion and occupation of China burial sites of, 216-220 by, 49, 55 individualized ideological basis of, Jewelery, see also Earrings 175-176 Lower Xiajiadian, 106, 107 Liangzhu, 224n Index 273

Liao culture Lower Xiajiadian culture (cont.) population density of, 193 sociopolitical organization of (cont.) settlement patterns of, 183- 184 central-place model of, 121-122, 135, Liao dynasty, 64, 119-120, 180-181, 182, 164, 186, 236 183-184, 195 changes in, 89, 91 Liaoning Province, 223n grouporiented ideology of, 138, 232 archaeological chronology of, 54 hierarchical organization of, 124, dagger-axe from, 106 137, 138 Kaladqin site, 98 local subsystems of, 137 Liaozhongjing, 180 effect on the population, 237-238 Lineage affiliations, 2 rank-size analysis of, 135-137, 141n Linxi County, copper ore mine site, 160- relationship to burial practices, 114- 161 115 Liu Guanmin, 58 suggestions for future research into, Longshan culture, 203, 204 236-238 relationship to Lower Xiajiadian cul- synthesis of, 137- 138 ture, 209-210 types of, 232 Longshan sites, 205 weaving industry, 106 Lower Xiajiadian culture, 89-141 Lower Xiajiadian sites agriculture in, 52, 122, 128, 232 altitude above sea level, 194 catchment analysis of, 126-135 artifacts from, 101 animal husbandry in, 52, 120 bone artifacts, 106, 109 chronology of, 54, 55-56, 185-186 ceramics, 101-105 craft specialization in, 109, 120- 121 lacquer artifacts, 109 economic base of, 119-121 metal artifacts, 106-109, 112, 113 effect of migration on, 84-86, 104, stone artifacts, 105-106 209-210 burial sites: see Burial sites, Lower environmental and climatic conditions Xiajiadian of, 69-70 ceremonial sites, 89, 123, 140n grouporiented ideology of, 30, 138, Chijiaying (number 65) site, 97, 133, 232 193 interregional interactions of, 190-191, Dadianzi site, 60, 69, 70, 89, 110-115, 200-212, 232 121, 139n, 150, 186, 209 with Erlitou culture, 207-209 defense systems of, 54-55, 91-95, 96, leadership of 123, 131-132, 190, 208 prestige of, 186 locations of, 115-116, 117-118 religious, 190 rammed-earth technique of, 2 10 militaristic focus of, 54 relationship to burial sites, 110 polities of, geographic area of, 62, 118- relationship to craft specialization, 119 120 population density of, 193 watchtowers of, 210 relationship to Longshan culture, 209- distance from closest water source, 210 194 social complexity of, 44, 124 distance from Yinhe River, 194 comparison with Erlitou culture, 202, distribution of, 59, 90, 91 206-212 Dongbajia site, 97, 99-100, 139n social status in, 138- 139 ecology of, 1 15 sociopolitical organization of. 99, 100, extended occupation of, 119- 120 121-137, 186 Fanzhangzi site, 110, 114, 140n catchment analysis of, 124-135, 137, Fengxia site, 98, 120, 139n 140- 141n geographic area of, 56-57 274 Index

Lower Xiajiadian sites (cont.) Lower Xiajiadian sites (cont.) habitation sites, 74, 95-101 Shuiquan site, 120 homogeneity of style of, 187 size of, 91 lack of data bout, 60 catchment analysis of, 124-135 proximity to Upper Xiadiajian ceme- correlation with population, 128- 129 teries, 150 rank-size analysis of, 135- 137 internal organization of, 65, 95-96 size distribution of, 122-123. 124 as social status indicator, 99, 100, subperiods of, 105 123-124, 125, 186,238 Zhizhushan site, 101 stone houses, 74 Luoyang, 201, 202, 204 survey methodology for, 65 Hongshan postsherds from, 73 Mao, 49, 51 Kalaqin site, 98 Maori, 37 locations of, 11 5-118, 140n Marx, Karl, 25, 51 number 1, 140n Marxist theory, 25, 26, 31. 32, 45n.51 number 2, 140n Masks number 3, 139n animal, 209, 210-211 number 8, 73 dragon, 209 number 14, 139n Materialism, 25-26, 45n number 16, 139n Materialization, 29-30 number 2 1, 139n May 4th movement, 49, 71n number 24, 96, 122, 125, 133, 139n Maya, social collapse of, 12, 13, 14 number 30, 140n Mayapan, 13 number 34, 139n Mencius, 233 number 41, 139n Mengzi, 233 number 42, 139n Mental development, application to social number 48, 139n evolutionary theory, 10- 11 number 63, 122-123 Mesoamerica number 65, 116-117, 133, 193 division of labor in, 45n number 94, 123, 140n social evolutionary process in, 33, 189, number 96, 97, 122-123, 125, 133, 190 139n, 141n Mesopotamian sites, catchment analysis number 117, 122, 133, 134 of, 126 number 133, 122 Metal artifacts, see also Bronze artifacts; number 138, 117-1 18 Gold artifacts number 145, 117-118 Lower Xiajiadian, 106-109, 112, 113 number 149, 117-118 Mexico number 151, 122, 133, 134 Oaxaca valley, 193 number 154, 117 settlement hierarchy in, catchment anal- number 156, 117 ysis of, 130, 131 number 157, 117 Microliths, flint occupation during Upper Xiajiadian pe- Lower Xiajiadian, 120 riod, 148, 161 Upper Xiajiadian, 153 public structures of, 89, 208, 236, 237 Migration ritual sites, 123, 137 as diffusion mechanism, 17 Sefangdi site, 120 effect on Lower Xiajiadian culture, 84- settlement patterns of, 91, 143, 186, 236 86, 104, 209-210 catchment analysis of, 124-135 Millet, 120 comparison with Upper Xiajiadian Mines, copper ore, of Upper Xiajiadian settlement patterns, 163-164 period, 160-161 Index 275

Mirrors, bronze, 168, 224n Nomadism, pastoral (cont.) Models, archaeological, see also Multidi- emergence in Upper Xiajiadian culture, mensional theoretical frame- 194-199 work, of sociopolitical change kinship and, 233 as basis for new research strategies, as political resistance, 198 227, 234 relationship to bronze artifact develop- Molds, ceramic, 161 ment, 143 Mongolia, bronze artifact production in, relationship to social complexity, 15 143 North China, definition of. 71n Monuments: see Public buildings/monu- Northeast China, 53-60; see also specific ments regions and cultures Moral superiority, 11 interactions with Upper Xiajiadian cul- Multidimensional theoretical framework, ture, 228-229 of sociopolitical change, 6-7, paleoenvironment of, 181, 182 39-45,227-241 Northern Corridor advantages of, 230-231 bronze artifacts from, 155- 158 goal of, 234 definition of, 71n hypothesis generation with, 234 development of socially-complex societ- implication for future research, 234-241 ies in, 51 ; see also Hongshan cul- in Hongshan culture, 235-236 ture; Lower Xiajiadian culture: in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 236-238 Upper Xiajiadian culture in Upper Xiajiadian culture, 239-241 Nuluerhu mountain range, 67

Nanshangen site, 147-148, 166-167 Oaxaca valley, Mexico, 193 Nantaidi site, 76 Oracle bones Nationalism, 10 as evidence of interregional interaction, influence on Chinese archaeology, 49-50 209 Needles, bone Lower Xiajiadian, 109, 112, 121, 139n, Lower Xiajiadian, 109 210 Upper Xiajiadian, 154-155, 173 Shang, 49, 109, 139n, 140n, 210 Neo-evolutionists, 10 Upper Xiajiadian, 155 Neolithic cultures Zhukaigou, 140n, 210 of Chifeng area, 53-54, 55 Ordos region, 143, 159, 176n interregional interactions of, 201, 228- Ornaments 229 bone, Upper Xiajiadian, 153 social complexity of, 20 1 bronze, Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 168 of Wessex, England, 32-33, 84 semiprecious stone, 87n, 153 of basin, 104 stone, Upper Xiajiadian, 153 Neo-Marxist theory, 3 1 Outer Mongolia, Liao dynasty's control of, Network polities, 219 180 Network power strategy, 33-34, 41, 189 Ningcheng excavation, 105 Pacific Islands, chiefdoms of, 22 Niuheliang site, 54, 57, 80, 82-83 Paleoclimate, of Chifeng area, 69-70, 71n Nomadism, pastoral Paleoenvironment Chinese historiographic descriptions of, of Chifeng area, 69-70, 71n 52-53 of northeastern China, 181, 182 dichotomy with agriculture, 221-222 Paleolithic cultures, of Chifeng area, 53 emergence in Chifeng area, 193-199 Paradigms, evolutionary, 2 emergence in Northern Corridor, 52- Pastoralism: see Nomadism, pastoral 53, 144, 180, 193-199 Pastoral societies, specialized, 71n 276 Index

Peer-polity model, 21-22, 23, 233 Power strategies, 189 Periphery, see also Center-periphery Prehistoric societies, spatial arrangement- model, of interregional interaction based classification of, 62 differentiated from frontiers, 45n Prestige artifacts, see also specific types of Pig husbandry, in Lower Xiajiadian cul- artifacts ture, 120 definition of, 36 Pigs, bones of economic theories of, 36-39 from Erlitou sites, 206 Processual archaeology, 16 from Lower Xiajiadian sites, 120 diffusion models of, 17 from Upper Xiajiadian sites, 162, 163 evolutionary approach of, 4 Pingdingshan site, 147- 148 leadership theories of, 31-32 Pingquan Dongnangou site, 149, 177n materialistic bias of, 25-26 Plaques, decorative bronze multidimensional framework for, 4 1, Chinese/Northern Corridor comparison 42 of, 157 postprocessual critique of, 3, 28 Upper Xiajiadian, 143 Public buildings/monuments Political control, see also Leadership construction of, 13-14, 223n as basis for social complexity develop Hongshan, 84 ment, 2 Lower Xiajiadian, 89, 236, 237 Political organization: see Sociopolitical organization Qidan, 180 Pollen analysis, 69, 70 writing system of, 181 Polyani, Karel, 35-36 Qijia, 224n Population density Qilaotu mountain range, 67 agriculture as basis for, 196 Qin empire, 179, 180, 198 relationship to sociopolitical structure, Qing dynasty, 71n, 195 192-193 Qin-Han Great Wall, 180 Population growth, effect on social corn- plexity, 11, 45n Positivism, 1 Racism, 10 Postprocessual archaeology Radiocarbon dating, 56, 201 anti-evolutionary theory of, 10-1 1 Reaping tools, Upper Xiajiadian, 161 processualist critique of, 3, 28 Relativism, cultural, 10, 16 Postsherds, see also Ceramics; Pottery Religion, 25, 29; see also Oracle bones; Hongshan, 74, 76, 80 Ritual activities; Ritual sites from ritual sites, 80 Renfrew, Colin, 32-33 Lower Xiajiadian, 65, 101 Ritual activities as population density indicator, 193 in Lower Xiajiadian culture, 121 Upper Xiajiadian, 146, 148, 160-161 use of prestige objects in, 37 Pottery Ritual sites as evidence of interregional interaction, Hongshan, 79-80, 82-83, 235 209 Lower Xiajiadian, 123, 137 Hongshan, 54, 76, 77 Roman empire, 13-14, 40 as grave goods, 80, 81 Rong, 218 from ritualistic sites, 235 Ryuzo, Torii, 55 Lower Xiajiadian, 101-105, 139n as grave goods, 102-103, 104, 120 Sanzuodian village, 62 with imitations of bronze artifacts, 107 Sayil, 13 as social status indicator, 177n Scythopolis, 13- 14, 46n Upper Xiajiadian, as grave goods, 167, Sefangdi site, 120 168, 169, 170 Seiichi, Mizuno, 55, 56 Index 277

Semiprecious stone ornaments Skeletal remains, dietary analysis of, 238, Hongshan, 87n 240-241 Upper Xiajiadian, 153 Smith, Adam, 34 Settlement patterns Smith, G.E., 17 central-place model of, 121-122 Social complexity of Chifeng area, 62 of Chifeng araa, 61-62 of Hongshan culture, 73-79, 183 Chinese archaeology’s interpretation of, lack of data bout, 60 5, 50-51 of Liao culture, 183-184 components of, 43 of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 91, 124- horizontal shifts and vertical shifts in, 125, 143, 163-164,186,236 14-15 surveys and sampling of, 62 of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 44, 124 of Upper Xiajiadian culture, 163-164,240 comparison with Erlitou culture, 202, of warring-states to Han period, 183 206-2 12 Shamanism, Chinese, 2 multilineal concept of, 1 1 - 12, 13 Shang dynasty effect of population growth on, 11, 45n bronze vessels of, 57, 207, 223n political control as basis of, 2 capitals of, 49, 204 relationship to ideology of social organi- Early, 209 zation, 189-190, 191 Erligang phase, 107, 203, 223n relationship to interregional interaction, Late, 56, 158- 159 200 oracle bones of, 49, 109, 139n, 140n, relationship to pastoralism, 15 210 relationship to social evolution, 11 overthrow of, 2 13 of Upper Xiajiadian culture, 14-15, 144, stamped-earth burial techniques of, 163- 176 216-217 relationship to grave goods, 163- 176 Zhou period of, 207 Social evolutionary theory Shang period, Chinese-Northern Corridor of Chinese archaeology, 51, 53 interaction during, 221 criticism of, 10-1 1 Shanrong, 218 of endogenous influences on Shanxian, 204 sociopolitical processes, 16 Sheep, bones of multidimensional model of, 4 from Erlitou culture sites, 206 Social inequality, relationship to coali- from Lower Xiajiadian sites, 120 tions, 3 from Upper Xiajiadian sites, 162 Sociopolitical change, 9 Shells/shell artifacts, as grave goods, 70, Chinese archaeological view of, 51 71n climatic factors in, 69-70 in Erlitou graves, 206, 207 multidimensional framework for: see in Lower Xiajiadian graves, 112, 113- Multidimensional theoretical 114, 121, 208 framework, for sociopolitical in Upper Xiajiadian graves, 167, 168 change Shi class, 14, 27 peer polity theory of, 21-22, 23 Shovels, bone relationship to ideology, 26-30 Lower Xiajiadian, 109 sociopolitical dimensions of, 40-41 Upper Xiajiadian, 154- 155 Sociopolitical organization Shuiquan site, 120 influence of endogenous and exoge- Siberia nous processes on, 16-18 bronze artifact production in, 143 of Lower Xiajiadian culture, 12 1 - 137 interregional interactions in, 21 1, 222, catchment analysis of, 124-135, 137, 229 140-141n Sickles, stone, Hongshan, 77, 79 central-place model of, 121-122, 135 278 Index

Sociopolitical organization (cont.) culture, 139n of Lower Xiajiadian culture (cont.) Taotie, 210-211 grouporiented ideology of, 138 Taxation, 36, 38, 196 hierarchical organization of, 124, Temples, 83, 84, 186 137, 138 Tools local subsystems of, 137 bone, Upper Xiajiadian, 154-155, 168 rank-size analysis of, 135-137, 141n bronze relationship to leadership strategy, 232 Erlitou, 207 relationship to population density, 192- Upper Xiajiadian, 155, 167, 168, 169, 193 170 of upper Xiajiadian culture, 144, 175-176 Lower Xiajiadian, 101, 105-106, 120 Song dynasty, 50, 180 metal, Lower Xiajiadian, 106 Spatulas, bone, Upper Xiajiadian, 154-155 stone Spindle whorls, Lower Xiajiadian, as grave drilled, 153 goods, 112-113, 108, 173 Hongshan, 77 Spoons, bronze, as Upper Xiajiadian grave Lower Xiajiadian, 101, 105-106 goods, 168 Upper Xiajiadian, 153, 160-161, 167, Spring and Autumn Annals, 28 168, 169, 170 Spring and Autumn Period, 22, 213 Trade, see also Interregional interaction State-level society between Chinese and northern cul- emergence in China, 48 tures, 218 Steppes, Central Asian by Lower Xiajiadian culture, 121 Chinese cultural traits of, 2 11 Trade studies, 17 interregional interactions in, 222 Traits, cultural, shared, 23 nomadic pastoral societies of, 51, 61 Transbaikal area Steward, Julian, 25-26 bronze artifact production in, 143 Stone artifacts interregional interactions og, 222, Hongshan, 77-79, 86n 229 Lower Xiadiajian, 105-106, 113, 139n, Turquiose artifacts, Erlitou, 207 140n Upper Xiajiadian, 153-154, 161, 167 Upper Xiadiajian culture, 54 as grave goods, 167 agriculture in, 52, 70, 153, 161, 163, Stone piles 181, 184, 194, 195, 232 at Hongshan sites, 79-80, 235 animal husbandry of, 161-163, 194 at Lower Xiajiadian sites, 65 bronze industry of, 108-109 at Upper Xiajidian sites, 148, 150-15 1 burial sites: see Burial sites, Upper Storage pits Xiajiadian Hongshan, 76, 79, 236 chronology of, 54, 55-56, 185-186, Lower Xiajiadian, 100-101, 120 213 Upper Xiajiadian, 147-148, 161 economic base of, 161-163, 240-241 Stylistic expression, relationship to emergence of pastoralism in, 194- 199 sociopolitical ideology, 187 environmental and climatic conditions Substantivist theory, of economic sys- Of, 69-70 tems, 34.35-36, 37, 38-39 herding in, 240 Surveys, 50 heterogeneity of stylistic expression of, of Chifeng area, 61-62 187, 191-192 Symbolism, processual analysis of, 4 hunting in, 162-163 Syros, Chdlandriani cemetery excavation influence on the Yan state, 220 on, 177n interregional interactions of, 190-191, System theory, 1 212-222,229 Index 279

Upper Xiadiajian culture (cont.) Upper Xiadiajian sites (cont.) leadership of, 187, 239 population density, 148 power of, 219, 221 Xiajiadian site, 146-147, 148 use of prestige grave goods by, 2 16- Xiaobaiyang site, 150, 166-167, 169, 220 170-171, 174 pastoral nomadism basis of, 239 Xiaoheishigou site, 158, 176n polities of Uxmal, 13 chiefdom-level, 214 competition among, 233 Versailles agreements, 49, 71 n size of, 240 sense of local identity in, 163 War settlement patterns of, comparison with influence on Upper and Lower Lower Xiajiadian settlement pat- Xiajiadian cultures, 190- 191 terns, 163-164 relationship to acquisition of prestige social complexity of, 44, 55, 161, 163- objects, 39 176, 186-187 as social complexity cause, 190 decline of, 239 Warringstates period, 179-184, 213 factors affecting, 191 peer-polity networks of, 22 horizontal and vertical shifts in, 191- Watchtowers, 210 192 Wealth finance systems, 36-37 models of, 173-176 Weapons sociopolitical organization, 144, 196 bronze individualizing, 30, 187, 175-176, 239 Chinese/Northern Corridor compari- multidimensional framework of, 230 son of, 155-156 suggestions for future research about, of Chinese origin, 155-156, 214-216 239-241 Erlitou, 207 types of, 232 Upper Xiadiajian. 155, 167, 168, 169. transition to pastoral economy, 38- 39 170 Upper Xiadiajian sites Upper Xiajiadian, 190 altitude above sea level, 194, 195 Weaving industry, Lower Xiajiadian, 106 artifacts from, 151-161; see also spe- basin, 60 cific types of artifacts Weiyingzi culture, 54, 185-186, 196, heterogenity of style of, 187, 191-192 223n burial sites: see Burial sites, Upper Wessex, Neolithic culture of, 32-33, 84 Xiajiadian White, Leslie, 25-26 Dajing site, 160, 161 Wittfogel, Karl, 46n defensive walls of, 138- 139n World system model, 19-21, 22, 45n distance from closest water source, Worldview, Chinese, 23-24 194, 195 Writing systems distance from Yinhe River, 194 Chinese, 214 distribution of, 145 Qidan, 181 Dongnangou site, 15 1 geographic area of, 56-57 Xia dynasty, 71n, 200-202, 207-208; see location of, 11 5 also Erlitou culture Nanshangen site, 147-148,155,166-167 Xiajiadian site, see also Lower Xiajiadian number 24, 148 sites; Upper Xiajiadian sites number 32, 153 cultural chronology of, 55-56 number 123, 153 Xiaobaiyang site, 150, 166-167, 169, 170, Pingdingshan site, 147-148 174 Pingquan Dongnangou site, 149, 177n Xiaoheishigou site, 158, 215, 217, 224n 280 Index

Xiaoheyan culture, 84-86, 185- 186 Yingjinhe River basin, 68, 140n Xiaoheyan period, 210 surveys of, 58, 59 Xiaoheyan sites, 86 Yinhe River, junction with Yingjinhe Xiaozhuanshanzi site, 55-56 River, 63, 64 Xiaozhushan culture, polychrome ceramic Yinhe River basin, 62, 140n vessels of, 139n environmental zones of, 181 Xigangou tributary, 118 as Hongshan settlement area, 74, 76 Xilamulun River basin, 57, 67, 68, 160 as Lower Xiadiajian settlement site, 91, Xilugahe River basin, 119, 140n 126, 134, 162 Xindian site, 94 surveys of, 58, 59 Xinglongwa culture, 53-54 Upper Xiajiadian burial sites distribu- Xiongnu confederacy, 180, 198, 222 tion near, 150 Xitai site, 76 as Upper Xiadiajian settlement area, 162 Xu, Henan Provineec, 215 Yinjiadian village, 62 Xuchang area, 217 Yinxu, 49 Xu Guangii, 58 Yueshi, 224n Xunzi, 27 Yuxi, 202, 203, 204, 205, 207, 208 Xu state, 217, 218 Zhao, King, 213 Yangzi River basin Zhaobaogou culture, 53-54 bronze artifacts from, 155 Zhaobaogou site, 76 as origin site of Chinese civilization, 23 Zhaosuhe River basin, 119 state-level polities in, 176, 212, 214 Zhengzhou city, 201, 202, 204 Yan state, 180, 198 Zhengzhou site, 107 expansion into Northern Corridor, 221 Zhizhushan site, 101 influence of Upper Xiajiadian culture Zhongguo, 199 on, 220 Zhongyuan area, 40, 50 stamped-earth burial techniques of, as focus of Chinese archaeology, 58 216-217 oracle bone use in, 109 Yaowangmaio site, 55-56 as origin site of Chinese cultural devel- Yellow River basin opment, 53, 199-200 agrarian states of, 5 1 rammed-earth stone walls of, 210 archaeology of, 60 Xia dynasty of, 200-202 bronze artifacts from, 155, 156 Zhou dynasty, 224n Erlitou settlements of, 204 aristocracy of, 14 Neolithic cultures of, 104 Early, 56, 158-159 as origin site of Chinese civilization, 23, Eastern, 14, 37, 233 45n, 53-54, 61 Western, 37, 56, 157, 210, 213, 216- polities of 217 interaction with Upper Xiajiadian cul- Zhoujiadi site, 70 ture, 228-229 Zhukaigou culture, 210 state-level, 176, 212 Zhukaigou site, 140n