THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE IN AFRICAN FRESHWATERS: UNDERWATER, UNDER THREAT An analysis of the status and distribution of freshwater species throughout mainland Africa
Edited by: William Darwall, Kevin Smith, David Allen, Robert Holland, Ian Harrison and Emma Brooks
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment
THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE IN AFRICAN FRESHWATERS: UNDERWATER, UNDER THREAT An analysis of the status and distribution of freshwater species throughout mainland Africa
Edited by: William Darwall, Kevin Smith, David Allen, Robert Holland, Ian Harrison and Emma Brooks
Project Partners:
Financial support provided by:
and:
In kind funding was provided by: The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organizations, concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
This project has been carried out with financial support from the European Union under grant Contract: EuropeAid/ENV/2004-81917. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations.
Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Red List logo: © 2008 Citation: Darwall, W.R.T., Smith, K.G., Allen, D.J., Holland, R.A, Harrison, I.J., and Brooks, E.G.E. (eds.). 2011. The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat. An analysis of the status and distribution of freshwater species throughout mainland Africa. Cambridge, United Kingdom and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xiii+347pp+4pp cover. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1345-8 Cover design: Cambridge Publishers Cover photos: Front: Tanganyika cichlid (Xenotilapia melanogenys) a Data Deficient species endemic to Lake Tanganyika © Angel M Fitor/Photolibrary Ltd. Back: A girl collects water supplied by Bale Mountains National Park in south-central Ethiopia © Robin Moore All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder.
Layout by: Cambridge Publishers Produced by: Cambridge Publishers Available from: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), Publications Services, 28 Rue Mauverney, 1196 Gland, Switzerland, Tel: + 41 22 999 0000, Fax: + 41 22 999 0020, Email: [email protected], www.iucn.org/publications A catalogue of IUCN publications is also available. INTRODUCTION | CONTENTS iii 4 6 8 ix xi xii 34 34 35 35 36 37 38 39 41 44 44 49 49 49 55 60 63 65 13 13 16 18 22 23 24 25 25 26 26 28 34 34 ......
......
......
...... Habitat transformation Pollution Invasive alien species Impact of fi sheries Impact of fi Climate change
......
A short introduction to the ichthyofaunal regions A short introduction General overview ecosystems to African freshwater Threats Species diversity biodiversity to freshwater Major threats 1.2.2.1 1.2.2.2 1.2.2.4 The African Green Revolution and wetlands The African Green ......
Odonates Crabs Aquatic plants sh species All fi species Threatened Restricted Range species cient species Data Defi Extirpated species Ecosystem functions Ecosystem values Fishes Molluscs
Global status of freshwater biodiversity Global status of freshwater 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 3.1.1 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.2.3 1.2.2.5 1.2.3 ecosystems in Africa Functions and values of freshwater 1.3.1 2.1.1 2.1.2 1.1.1 Overview of the ichthyofauna of Africa Selection of priority taxa Regional approach Regional Data collation and quality control mapping Species status Assessment of species threatened Nomenclature Conservation status Patterns of overall species richness Situation analysis for Africa 1.1 Acknowledgements Chapter 1 - Background 2 Contents Introduction Chapter 3 - Fish 3.1 42 2.1 Chapter 2 - Assessment methodology Chapter 2 - Assessment methodology 32 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.2 3.3 1.3 1.3.2 Foreword Executive Summary 1.1.2 1.2 iv INTRODUCTION | CONTENTS Species inthespotlight Species inthespotlight 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 Species inthespotlight Species inthespotlight Species inthespotlight Species inthespotlight Species inthespotlight 3.6 3.5 itr,dvriy itiuin n osrain 126 5.1 history, diversity, distribution, andconservation Chapter 5- 92 Introduction diversity, distribution,andconservation Chapter 4-Freshwater molluscsofAfrica: 3.4
Species inthespotlight Species inthespotlight Recommendedconservationmeasures Main threats Overviewoffreshwater molluscandiversityinAfrica Conservationrecommendations Research actionsrequired Majorthreats tospecies
Introduction
Chapter 4-Speciesinthespotlight Chapter 3-Speciesinthespotlight Conservation statusanddistributionoffreshwater molluscs 5.1.2 5.1.1 4.5.1 Understanding theimpactofmolluscsonhumanhealthandlivelihoods 4.3.8 4.3.7 4.3.6 4.3.5 4.3.4 4.3.3 4.3.2 4.3.1 4.2.5 4.2.4 4.2.3 4.2.2 4.2.1 4.1.6 4.1.5 4.1.4 4.1.3 4.1.1 4.1.2 Knowledge ofAfricanOdonata Odonatainbiogeography andconservation Recommendedresearch actions Invasivespecies–fi sh farming Sedimentation Water pollution ofthreat Regionalpatterns Extinctionpatterns DataDefi cient species Threatened species Molluscandiversityincraterlakes Molluscandiversityinartesianbasins Molluscandiversityinriverbasins Molluscandiversityinancientlakes 4.2.1.1 Climate change Invasive species–molluscsandtheirimpactonindigenous Invasive species–waterhyacinthandotherplants Dams Undescribed species Restricted rangespecies Molluscan diversityinmontanelakes Molluscan diversityinsalinelagoons,saltmarshesandmangroves ...... Dragonfl ...... Changessincethe1996assessment ...... –Amolluscwithabitofmuscle –Canthelastpopulationsof giantAfricanfreshwater pearlmusselbesaved? –Cauldrons forfi Africa’ssh biodiversity:western craterlakes –TheTwee Riverredfi n –aCriticallyEndangered minnowfrom SouthAfrica –Auniquespeciesfl ock inLakeTana –theLabeobarbuscomplex –Forest remnantsAfrica–vanishingislands ofsylvanfi inwestern shes Africa–afriendandfoe ineastern –Tilapia – – ...... Freshwater molluscsare important–especially totheAfricanopenbillstork The Congoblindbarb:MbanzaNgungu’s albinocavefi sh ...... ies anddamselfl ......
......
......
......
......
......
...... ies ofAfrica(Odonata): ......
...... 128 128 128 124 123 120 119 118 117 117 114 114 114 114 114 113 112 112 111 110 109 106 106 105 104 104 103 102 102 100 97 96 94 87 85 82 79 76 74 71 70 66 INTRODUCTION | CONTENTS v 166 166 167 168 168 169 169 170 170 170 170 171 172 172 173 174 175 176 177 128 129 132 132 132 132 133 133 133 138 141 143 143 145 145 147 148 149 153 153 154 156 156 158 159 159 160 162 162 164 164 166 ......
......
...... A guardian of Kenya's watershed: Maathai's longleg of Kenya's A guardian ...... – – The globe skimmer: on a journey the world around y in a fragile realm – The Pemba featherleg: a fragile damselfl with an ancient lineage – A wonderful water relic ...... Taxonomy and identifi cation and identifi Taxonomy Red List assessment of African dragonfl ies Red List assessment of African dragonfl Dams Understanding change Distribution and ecology and Distribution Patterns of diversity cation Impoverishment and diversifi Relict fauna Modern fauna Upper Guinea Lower Guinea Congo Basin Overview South Africa Angola Eastern Mountains and Coast Indian Ocean Atlantic Ocean ...... species Distribution of threatened Habitat degradation and deforestation Mining sh Alien plants and fi extraction and pollution Water Field survey Ecological research Information disclosure Richness Relevance and context Overview Ethiopia Albertine Rift ...... Zambezia ...... Major threats Diversity fauna Afrotropical fauna Afro-montane Insular fauna 5.1.2.1 5.1.2.1 5.4.1.1 5.4.1.2 5.4.2.1 5.4.2.2 5.4.2.3 5.4.2.4 5.4.2.5 5.4.3.1 5.4.3.2 5.4.3.3 5.4.3.4 5.1.2.2 5.1.2.2 5.2.1.1 5.2.1.2 5.2.2.1 5.2.2.2 5.2.2.3 5.2.2.4 5.3.2.1 5.3.2.2 5.3.2.3 5.3.2.4 5.3.3.1 5.3.3.2 5.3.3.3 5.3.3.4 5.3.3.5 5.3.4.1 5.3.5.1 5.3.5.2 Research actions Research Conservation actions History Guineo-Congolian fauna Complex faunas fauna Palaearctic Status 5.4.2 5.4.3 Diversity and history Diversity and 5.2.1 5.2.2 endemism and threat Regional diversity, 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 5.3.4 5.3.4.2 5.3.5 5.3.6 Conservation 5.4.1 Chapter 5 - Species in the spotlight
Species in the spotlight
5.4.4 Species in the spotlight Species in the spotlight Species in the spotlight 5.2 5.3 5.4 vi INTRODUCTION | CONTENTS 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.4 7.3.2 7.3 7.2 Species inthespotlight 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.2 hpe qai lnso fia iest,dsrbto n osrain 200 Chapter 7-AquaticplantsofAfrica:diversity, distributionandconservation 6.1 178 Chapter 6-Freshwater crabsofAfrica:diversity, distribution,andconservation 7.1 Species inthespotlight Keymessages Conservationrecommendations ofspeciesrichness Patterns Extirpatedspecies Conservationrecommendations Majorthreats ofspeciesrichness Patterns Conservationstatus Background Majorthreats to aquatic plants Research actionsrequired
Chapter 6-Speciesinthespotlight Conservation 7.7.6 7.7.5 7.7.4 7.7.3 7.7.2 7.7.1 7.6.7 7.6.6 7.6.5 7.6.4 7.6.3 7.6.2 7.6.1 7.5.4 7.5.3 7.5.2 7.5.1 7.3.1 Overview ofthefreshwater fl ora ofmainlandcontinentalAfrica 6.4.4 6.4.3 6.4.2 6.4.1 6.3.4 6.3.3 6.3.2 6.3.1 6.1.1 Overview oftheAfricanfreshwater crabfauna Endemicspecies Furtherresearch Speciesorsitebasedactions Alienspeciesremoval Planningandpolicy Climatechange Invasivespecies Water use:extractionandtransfers DataDefi cient species Threatened species Continentalendemicspecies Allassessedspecies Allspecies Taxonomic issues Pollution Habitatdestruction DataDefi cient species Restrictedrangespecies Biogeographicpatterns Restoration Catchment-scale actions Water pollution Habitat lossduetoinfrastructure development Habitat lossduetoagriculture General threats Natural predators andcompetitionwithintroduced species Threatened species All freshwater crabspecies:interpretation ofdistributionpatterns ...... tatus s ......
...... –TheEastAfricantree holecrab–spectacularadaptation – ......
......
...... studies inevolutionandextinction A uniquespeciesfl ock offreshwater crabsinLakeTanganyika: amodelfor ......
......
......
......
...... 223 223 222 221 221 221 221 221 221 221 220 219 218 216 216 215 214 211 209 209 209 209 208 205 205 204 202 198 196 195 193 193 192 192 191 191 190 188 187 186 184 183 182 180 INTRODUCTION | CONTENTS vii 272 272 272 274 274 275 275 277 277 278 278 278 282 282 283 284 284 286 286 224 225 226 227 230 230 230 235 244 247 247 247 249 249 251 258 258 258 262 264 264 265 265 267 267 268 ......
......
......
...... A small wonder of nature saved from extinction saved from of nature wonder A small Water hyacinth, a threat to the freshwater biodiversity of western Africa to the freshwater hyacinth, a threat Water ...... – – Sailing fl owers – Sailing fl creator – The habitat – ......
...... When are site-scale actions or planning appropriate? site-scale When are Prioritisation of site-scale conservation actions Recent developments General issues of connectivity connectivity and lateral Threats ...... Adapting terrestrial approaches to freshwater ecosystems to freshwater approaches Adapting terrestrial Case studies of site-scale conservation intervention in southern Africa Planning and implementation spatial scales as units for conservation planning ecoregions Freshwater Patterns of richness and main threats species to African freshwater Distribution of threats species in Africa freshwater Biological invasions affecting taxonomic groups Congruence between ecosystems for freshwater areas Protected species for freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas Extinction – AZE sites Alliance for Zero species species and threatened cient Regions of Data Defi of new species cient species with records Comparing distributions of Data Defi (RAPs) Rapid Assessment Programs the past through the future conservation: seeing Climate change and African freshwater African waters: special qualities and challenges 100,000 years dynamism: the past A short history of African eco-hydrological climate change in Africa Signs of anthropogenic and responses trends Projecting change to freshwater Implications for facilitating healthy responses 9.1.3.2 9.1.3.3 9.2.1.1 9.2.1.2 Background ecosystems Application to freshwater Catchment versus site scale approaches Conclusions Use of biodiversity surrogates Data requirements
9.1.1 9.1.2 9.1.3 9.2.1 9.2.2 9.2.3 9.3.1 9.3.2 9.3.3 8.2.1 8.2.2 8.2.3 8.3.1 8.3.2 8.3.3 8.3.4 8.5.1 8.5.2 8.5.3 8.6.1 8.6.2 8.6.3 8.6.5 8.6.6 Chapter 7 - Species in the spotlight in the 7 - Species Chapter
Introduction Conservation action Conservation Systematic conservation planning Site scale conservation Catchment scale conservation Conclusions Africa biodiversity across Freshwater species Livelihoods dependence on freshwater for further work Areas of African freshwaters The future Species in the spotlight in the Species Chapter 9 - Conservation of freshwater ecosystems Chapter 9 - Conservation of freshwater 9.1 270 8.1 Chapter 8 - Synthesis for all taxa Chapter 8 - Synthesis 228 9.1.3.1 9.2 9.3 9.3.4 9.4 Species in the spotlight Species in the spotlight Species in the spotlight Species in 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.6.4 viii INTRODUCTION | CONTENTS Chapter 10References Chapter 9References Chapter 8References Chapter 7References Chapter 6References Chapter 5References Chapter 4References Chapter 3References Chapter 2References 10.2 An exampleofaspeciesassessmentsummaryanddistributionmap Appendix Chapter 1References References 288 10.1 Chapter 10-Developmentandpolicyplansforthefuture Freshwater biodiversitymanagementandconservation, policy, andtheprivatesector Wetland developmentplansforAfrica 10.2.3 10.2.2 10.2.1 10.1.5 10.1.4 10.1.3 10.1.2 10.1.1 Policyandtheprivatesector–conclusion Roleoftheprivatesector Thepolicyprocess Threat mitigationandmanagementplansthatintegrate freshwater biodiversity Impactofwetlanddevelopmentoninlandwaters DegradationandlossofAfrica’s wetlands Wetland resources anduses Development across Africa
......
......
...... 346 306 346 343 339 335 333 330 325 322 313 312 306 305 302 299 299 297 297 292 291 290 290 INTRODUCTION Acknowledgements |
Donors his valuable and thorough review of the chapter on plants, and IUCN would like to thank all the donors that have made this to C.D.K. Cook and H.J. Beentje for their useful comments. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS assessment possible. The project’s major donor was the Tom Brooks, Will Turner, and Daniel Brito are thanked for European Commission (EC), under grant number EuropeAid/ providing access to relevant unpublished materials. ENV/2004-81917. Financial support was also provided by the BioFresh project (funded by the European Union under the 7th Report photos Framework programme, Contract No. 226874); Conservation We would also like to thanks those who have contributed International (CI); Darwin Initiative of the UK Department for photos at no charge, including Conservation International Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra); IUCN National Marketing and Communications, and the numerous Committee of the Netherlands; IUCN Water and Nature photographers who have provided access to their images Initiative (WANI); MAVA Foundation pour la nature (MAVA); through Creative Commons. Ministrie von Buitenlandse Zaken/Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DGIS); Spanish Agency for International Cooperation GIS expertise Development (AECID); and United Nations Environment The species distribution mapping and analysis would not Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- have been possible without the GIS expertise provided by: 1) WCMC). In-kind support was provided by the Junta de IUCN; Vineet Katariya; Adrian Hughes; Yichuan Shi; Jemma Andalucia; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Able; and Sussanah O’Hanlon; and 2) UNEP-WCMC; Simon Marino; Okavango Research Institute (ORI), formerly the Blyth; Igor Lysenko and Corinna Ravilious. We also thank Harry Oppenheimer Okavango Research Centre (HOORC); the many volunteers who helped with mapping and editing South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI); South species distributions: Amy Milam; Arabie Jaloway; Ian Denty; African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB); Tour du Jennifer Taylor; Jo Fisher; Joe Wood; John Lynch; Kasia Valat; and Wetlands International (WI). Brooks; Kayshinee Ramchun; Pramod Lamsal; and Sarah Deacon. Project partners IUCN Species Programme, through its Freshwater Biodiversity IUCN Species Programme Unit, led this project in close collaboration with the following We thank the following members of the IUCN Species project partners, without which the project would not Programme who have provided support and training at have been possible: the South African Institute for Aquatic workshops and who also manage the IUCN Red List Biodiversity (SAIAB); the IUCN Centre for Mediterranean database and website through which the project assessment Cooperation; Wetlands International; the IUCN Regional data are made available: Anabelle Cuttelod; Caroline Pollock; Offi ce for Southern and Eastern Africa (IUCN ESARO); ITC Craig Hilton-Taylor; Helen Temple; Julie Griffi n; Leah Collett; (Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Maiko Lutz; Melanie Bilz; and Rebecca Miller. We also University of Twente); and the United Nations Environment thank Jane Smart, as Head of the Species Programme, Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- for her support and advice throughout this project. James WCMC). Ragle, who manages the Species Information Services (the database behind the IUCN Red List), is also acknowledged. Steering Committee Thanks are also due to the following members of the IUCN The members of Project Steering Committee are Communications teams who have provided their expertise acknowledged for providing sound knowledge and guidance on press releases and publications: Lynne Labanne; Kathryn throughout the life of the project. Annabelle Cuttelod, Pintus; Chadi Abi Faraj; and Sonsoles San Roman. We would Christoph Zöckler, Edward Westinga, Eliot Taylor, Fabio also like to thank Anna McIvor, Laurel Bennett, Nieves Garcia, Corsi, Geoffrey Howard, Hein van Gils, Ibrahima Thiam, Jean- and Thomas Lowe, who are no longer with IUCN Freshwater Christophe Vié, Jessica Jones, Laurent Ntahuga, Madiodio Biodiversity Unit but have contributed in many important Niasse, Mamadou Niane, Mame Dagou Diop, Matt Walpole, ways to the success of this project. Finally, we would like Neville Ash, Nkobi Moleele, Patrick Van Laake, Paul Skelton, to thank Jean-Christophe Vié for his valued support and Rami Salman, and Ward Hagemeijer. oversight throughout the project.
Report contributors Finances The editors thank the authors and contributors to this report, The fi nances of the project have been diligently managed and those others who have commented on the various stages by Maureen Martindell, Verity Saunders, Hugo Ruiz, Josette of the manuscript. Very special thanks to J.R. Timberlake for Lehmann and Line Hempel, who all deserve great credit, ix as do the fi nance teams of the project partners, including H. Brett, E. Brooks, R. Brummett, P. Budot, J. Burrows, J. Ronald Hasselerharm (ITC); Damas Mugashe, Thaddeus Cambray, B. Celestin, A.B. Cham, M. Cheek, A. Chilala, Kamundi and Edward Mudida (IUCN ESARO); Esther S. Chimatiro, F. Cholo, V. Clausnitzer, F.-L. Clotilde-Ba, W. Adhiambo Abonyo (IUCN Global Invasive Species Initiative); Coetzer, B. Collen, S. Conde, T. Contreras-MacBeath, A.J. Mohamed Karmass (IUCN Mediterranean Offi ce); Jane Crivelli, N. Cumberlidge, C. Cupido, B. Curtis, A. Cuttelod, Stockwell (SAIAB); Alex Gee (UNEP-WCMC); and Guenoune L. Da Costa, L. Dacunha, M. Dakki, F. Daniels, S. Daniels, Fatou Mbengue (Wetlands International Africa). A. Daoud-Bouattour, F.S. Darboe, W.R.T. Darwall, J. Day, L. De Vos, M.P. de Zeeuw, R. Dessouassi, C.H. Diagana, M.S.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS European Commission support Diallo, M. Diedhiou, E. Dieme-Amting, K.-D.B. Dijkstra, A.L.
| We would also like to thank Joan Cummins, who provided us Diop, F.N. Diop, M.D. Diop, M.S. Diop, A. Diouf, A.P. Dold, with guidance and support from the European Commission. R. Dow, L. Dreyer, I. Ebrahim, A.R. El Gamal, H.S. Elgrari , S. Elongo, J. Engelbrecht, M. Entsua-Mensah, H. Ferchichi, M.J. DVD layout Fernández, S.A.F. Ferreira, L. Fish, M.R.A. Fishar, D. Flanagan, The enclosed data DVD was produced using a programme W. Foden, S. Fofana, A.R. Gamal, Z. Gammar-Ghrabi, N. kindly written by Nicola Terry. Garcia, P. Gateretse, A. Getahun, M. Ghamizi, J. Ghogue, Z. Ghrabi, N. Gichuki, D. Graff, J. Griffi n, P. Grillas, M.B. Gueye, INTRODUCTION Logistics F. Habineza, O.E. Hadi, W. Hagemeijer, E. Hakizimana, M. We have, throughout the project, also been provided logistical Hanssens, B. Hassiba, C. Hay, N. Helme, C. Hilton-Taylor, support from non-project partners, and we would like to give G. Howard, H. Howege, L. Hugot, M. Hussein, S.N.B. Ifuta, our thanks to them: Samy Zalat, Randal Brummett and staff D. Impson, O.O. Itoua, G. Jacobseni, G. Jakubowsky, M.S. (WorldFish Centre), and The Research Centre for Biodiversity Jallow, H. James, I.B.H. Jilani, D. Johnson, A. Jørgensen, and Genetic Resources of Porto University (CIBIO-UP). B. Joseph, M. Jovic, A. Kabuto, A. Kagabo, D. Kahwa, V. Kalkman, D.A. Kamundi, A. Kane, R. Kane, C. Kapasa, M.H. IUCN Specialist Groups Kara, J. Kasembe, E. Kaunda, J. Kazembe, D. Khawa, N. The project has worked very closely with the IUCN Species Khumalo, J. Kipping, J. Kisakye, Z. Kiza, M. Kraiem, T.K. Survival Commission Specialist Group network who often Kristensen, J. Kruger, F. Krupp, R. Kyambadde, P. Laleye, provided species expertise. We would like to thank the IUCN/ C. Lange, S. Limam-Ben Saad, M. Lock, H. Lockwood, T. Wetlands International Freshwater Fish Specialist Group; Lowe, W.R.Q. Luke, P. Mafabi, Z. Magombo, A. Mahamane, Mollusc Specialist Group; Dragonfl y Specialist Group, and A. Mailosa, P. Makocho, V. Mamonekene, M.M. Manga, J. the Freshwater Crab and Crayfi sh Specialist Group. Manning, P.A. Manyama, S.A.E. Marijnissen, E. Marinus, B. Marshall, P.F. Matlamela, P.O. Mbeke, A. Mcivor, F. Médail, Additional regional acknowledgments A. Melembe, E. Michel, A. Mitra, T. Moelants, G. Mokhtar, A series of regional reports have also been published for which N. Mollel, S. Mondal, K.A. Monney, R.J.C. Monsembula, many additional people and organisations provided support; F.De Moor, A. Moyo, J. Msibi, Mubbala, A. Muhweezi, K. please see these reports for their acknowledgements. In Mukungilwa, S. Müller, J. Musoni, M. Mutekanga, B. Mwangi, particular, we thank the participation and contributions K. Naidoo, G. Natakimazi, A. Ndiaye, D.S. Ndiaye, T. Ndiaye, by many representatives of national scientifi c institutions G. Ndiritu, B. Ndodet, L. Nel, B. Ngatunga, C. Ngereza, and government agencies who attended workshops and B.K. Ngoy, F. Nicayennzi, N. Nje, K.A. Noby, M.V. Nshombo, supported the project. G. Ntakimazi, J. Ntukamazina, P. Ntumigomba, M. Nyaligu, T. Nzabi, L. Nzeyimana, K. Oberlander, G. O’Brien, E.A. Assessors, evaluators and workshop Odhiambo, S.S. Ogbogu, B. Olaosebikan, J.M. Onana, M. participants Ouali, L. Ouédraogo, D. Oyugi, D. Paugy, D. Petrovic, D. Pillay, Last, but defi nitely not least, the heart of this project is the C. Pollock, L. Potter, V. Pouomogne, V. Prié, D. Raimondo, M. information on African freshwater biodiversity that has been Ram, G.M. Reid, L. Rhazi, M. Rhazi, R. Riddick, E. Riservato, provided by many enthusiastic and committed experts from J.P. Roux, E. Rufuguta, J. Sa, S.B. Saad, S.L. Saad, A.M. across Africa and the wider world. Without these individuals Sajer, F. Salgado, B. Sambou, B. Samraoui, M. Samways, E. this work would not be possible, and they deserve special Sattout, W. Schneider, E. Schraml, K. Schütte, C.R. Scott- acknowledgement. Shaw, A. Seck, M. Seddon, S. Senol, C. Sheifer, A. Shmida, E. Sieben, J. Simaika, J. Šinžar-Sekulić, P. Skelton, K.G. Smith, The editors thank: E. Abban, H.M.H. Adliw, L. Agenbag, O. S. Smithies, D. Snijman, J. Snoeks, G. Soliman, A. Soumia, Akinsola, E. Akinyi, A. Alegro, M. Alexis, M. Ali, D.J. Allen, P. M. Sow, A.-S. Stensgaard, M. Stiassny, F. Suhling, K. Swart, Alves, A. Amadi, J.S. Amakye, S. Amara, G. Ameka, W. Amer, E. Swartz, S.I. Sylla, K. Tabu, M.I. Tattou, A.N. M. Tawe, S. K. Amoako, M. Angliss, C. Appleton, C. Archer, F.Y.K. Attipoe, Tchibozo, P. Tchouto, H.J. Temple, S. Terry, N. Thomas, S. A. Awaiss, A. Azeroual, D. Azevedo, S. Bagella, M. Baninzi, B. Todd, C.D. Touokong, C.D. Touokong, D. Tweddle, T. Twongo, Bayer, J. Bayona, G.M. De Bélair, S. Ben Saad, S. Benhouhou, D. Van Damme, E. Vela, J. Victor, J.-C. Vié, J. Viera, E. Vreven, L. Bennet, M. Benslama, M. Biague, C. Bigirimana, R. Bills, M.S.A. Warith, K. West, F. Wicker, F. Witte, A. Yahyaoui, R. x E. Bizuru, T. Bokhutlo, J. Boudot, L. Boulos, T. Bousso, Zaiss, and A.I. Zamba. INTRODUCTION Foreword
For millions of people throughout Africa, wetlands are we hope that decision-makers in Africa will now make | critical for livelihoods, providing vital supplies of water, food the right choices to develop their water resources in and materials as well as ecological services. Wetlands are, a sustainable manner whilst protecting and valuing FOREWORD however, suffering from high levels of degradation, and this biodiversity. is likely to increase dramatically over the next few decades as Africa strives to provide food, water and electricity to an The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands covers all aspects increasing population. of wetland conservation and wise use, recognising wetlands as ecosystems that are extremely important for In the most comprehensive assessment of its kind, 4,989 biodiversity conservation and for the well-being of human African freshwater species were assessed by close to 200 communities. A key commitment of Contracting Parties, or scientists over a six-year period for the IUCN Red List Member States, is to designate suitable wetlands for the of Threatened Species, including all described species List of Wetlands of International Importance (‘Ramsar List‘) of freshwater fi sh, molluscs, crabs, dragonfl ies and and ensure their effective management. This volume, and damselfl ies, and selected families of aquatic plants. The the data collated through the project, will greatly assist fi ndings from this new study give us a unique opportunity those parties to identify new Ramsar sites, to broaden to try to infl uence developers and governments when they their taxonomic coverage, and to help ensure the future are planning freshwater infrastructure projects, which are wise use of wetlands in general. I therefore commend still in their early stages in most of Africa. Until now we this report and the accompanying information to you, have not had the information we need about species and and I urge all those concerned with the management and the threats they face, but, armed with these IUCN Red List conservation of wetland resources, to read it and to use assessments, the extensive information upon which they this most extensive new data set in their future work to are based, and the overall fi ndings and recommendations, secure the future of Africa’s wetlands.
Anada Tiéga Secretary General The Convention on Wetlands Ramsar Secretariat Switzerland
xi Executive Summary
In this volume you will fi nd the most up-to-date information globally threatened. This level of threat is relatively high on the distributions and conservation status of species in in comparison to other taxonomic groups in Africa (12% all inland water ecosystems across mainland continental of birds, 19% of mammals, and 26% of amphibians are Africa and the reasons behind their declining status. This threatened) and is predicted to increase dramatically unless
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY represents the most comprehensive assessment yet of the ecological requirements of freshwater species are given
| freshwater biodiversity at the species level for an entire much greater consideration in future development planning, continent. For managers, this information will assist in in particular for development of water resources. Major designing and delivering targeted action to mitigate and threats are identifi ed as loss and degradation of habitat minimise these threats. From a policy perspective, this associated with deforestation, agriculture and infrastructure information is fundamental to meeting national obligations development, unsustainable levels of water extraction, water under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the pollution from domestic industrial and agricultural sources, Ramsar Convention, and the Millennium Development the introduction of alien invasive species, sedimentation, INTRODUCTION Goals (MDGs), and will input to national-level conservation mining and subsistence use and trade. The majority of priority setting. Information on species status is particularly threatened species are found along the Mediterranean and important for Target 12 of the CBD: ‘…by 2020 the extinction Atlantic coasts of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, in Upper of known threatened species has been prevented and their and Lower Guinea, southern and eastern South Africa, and conservation status, particularly of those most in decline, in the Great Lakes in eastern Africa. This distribution largely has been improved and sustained.’ refl ects a combination of high levels of current development activity, and high pressure on water resources, relative to Biodiversity within Africa’s inland waters is both highly other parts of the continent. diverse and of great importance to livelihoods and economies. Africa is, however, about to embark upon an Major centres of species richness include the Great Lakes of unprecedented scale of development within its water and eastern Africa, rivers in coastal sub-catchments in western agriculture sectors. Such development is proposed by Africa, and sub-catchments that trace the course of major many as essential if Africa is to support and improve the rivers through the centre of the continent, primarily in the livelihoods of a population that is projected to double by Democratic Republic of Congo (D. R. Congo). A network 2050 to almost two billion people. Development activities of river and lake basins is identifi ed as potential Key are, however, not always sustainable or compatible with Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) most important for the protection species conservation in inland waters, the needs of which of threatened and restricted range species. Forty eight sites are poorly represented within the development planning are proposed as new Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites process. holding Critically Endangered or Endangered freshwater species in most urgent need of conservation action. These One commonly cited reason for the inadequate representation proposed AZE sites should form the focus of the most of biodiversity in development and environmental planning immediate conservation actions if species extinctions are is a lack of readily available information on freshwater to be prevented. species. To close this information gap, the IUCN Species Programme, in collaboration with its partners, conducted Africa’s freshwater species are recognised to be as important an assessment of the status (according to the IUCN Red today as they ever have been for supporting livelihoods. List of Threatened Species) and distribution of all described The most heavily used species are the fi shes and plants, species of freshwater fi shes, molluscs, odonates, crabs, with 45% and 58% of species harvested, respectively. and selected families of aquatic plants from across mainland Justifi cation for the conservation and sustainable use of continental Africa. A total of 4,989 species were assessed. these species should, therefore, be clear to all. With species information compiled for each of 7,079 river or lake sub-catchments, this represents a major advance Inland waters throughout Africa are poorly represented in knowledge for informing development actions at a scale within the existing protected areas network, which is largely appropriate for conservation management. The full data designated for the protection of terrestrial ecosystems set, including all species distribution fi les, is available on and species. Future conservation efforts must take greater the DVD accompanying this report and through the IUCN account of the upstream and downstream connectivity in Red List website (www.iucnredlist.org). freshwater ecosystems. For example, it is recommended that conservation efforts focus on the protection of upper Twenty one percent of all species assessed are threatened catchment areas, provision of adequate environmental within Africa. Ninety one percent of these species (4,539) fl ows, and the inclusion of rivers within protected areas xii are endemic to the continent and are, therefore, also rather than as the boundary markers. Integrated river INTRODUCTION basin management and systematic conservation planning the continent to be managed in a way that ensures their approaches are recommended, along with the establishment long-term sustainability and maintains their ability to adapt of additional river and lake basin authorities. to changing conditions that they may face in the future. With this in mind, a number of case studies have been Patterns of past and present species diversity suggest that conducted, as a key component of this project, to develop Africa’s freshwater species have been highly resilient to a series of ‘Good Practice Guidelines’ for the integration | climate and geological change over time. The challenges of biodiversity information within the environmental and facing African freshwater species are daunting, but the development planning processes. The recommendations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY continent’s climate history suggests that signifi cant resilience from these studies can be found at: www.iucn.org/species/ exists. With informed development and management, freshwater/ African freshwaters may see a new century with different but not unhealthy qualities. The IUCN Red List is one of the most authoritative global standards supporting policy and action to conserve species. Following the six years of work required to complete this We hope this analysis, based in large part on an assessment study, we recognise that the greatest challenge is to ensure of species Red List status, will provide new information and the knowledge gained is transferred to the relevant decision insights, which will motivate actions to help safeguard an makers and stakeholders, and that it is updated on a essential and valued resource for millions of people – the regular basis. This will enable freshwater systems across diversity of life within Africa’s inland waters.
Key messages
➊ The inland waters of Africa support a high diversity legislation, without catchment-based planning that of aquatic species with high levels of endemism. extends the designated control areas to the edge of Many of these species provide direct (e.g., fi sheries) the river catchment, impacts such as water pollution and indirect (e.g., water purifi cation and fl ood control) and invasive alien species will inevitably lead to benefi ts to people. The conservation and sustainable species decline. management of these species is essential to the ➎ Management of water resources must take account livelihoods and economies of Africa’s people. of the requirements of freshwater biodiversity. If ➋ Current levels of threat to freshwater species we are to conserve and continue to benefi t from the across Africa are high relative to other ecosystems, services provided by freshwater species we need with 21% of species threatened. Predicted future to manage water as a resource for both people and levels of threat, in particular due to development of freshwater biodiversity. This approach is encapsulated water resources, are expected to be even higher. This within the Environmental Flows concept, which aims is largely a result of: i) the high degree of connectivity to ensure that there is enough water to maintain within freshwater systems, such that threats like environmental, economic and social benefi ts. pollution and invasive alien species spread more ➏ rapidly and easily than in terrestrial ecosystems; and Lack of available information should no longer be ii) the rapidly increasing use and development of water given as a reason for inadequate consideration resources, with little regard to the requirements of the for development impacts to freshwater species. freshwater dependent species sharing the resource. The data made available here must be integrated within the decision-making processes in planning for ➌ Protected areas must be better designed to protect the conservation and development of inland water freshwater species. The knowledge collected during resources, ensuring all development projects have a this assessment can be integrated into conservation ‘Net Positive Impact‘. planning processes to ensure representation of the freshwater species. Currently, protected areas ➐ Species information remains very limited for many are rarely designed to protect freshwater species, parts of Africa. The Congo, Angola, the Ethiopian meaning that taxonomic groups that represent a Highlands, and Upper and Lower Guinea in particular, signifi cant portion of the total species and genetic have been identifi ed as priorities for future fi eld survey. diversity on the planet are being overlooked. Information on the status and distribution of aquatic plants needs to be greatly improved. ➍ Protected areas and other conservation action for freshwater species must be designed to employ ➑ Environmental Impact Assessments should the principles of catchment management. Even expressly require reference to the species data where species are identifi ed by species-driven sets made available through the IUCN Red List. xiii Chapter 1. Background
Dudgeon, D.¹ (Section 1.1); Paugy, D. and Lévêque, C.² (Section 1.2); Rebelo, L.-M. and McCartney, M.P.³ (Section 1.3)
1 Chair of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Rd., Hong Kong SAR, China. 2 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Le Sextant, 44, bd de Dunkerque, CS 90009, 13572 Marseille, Paris, France 3 International Water Management Institute, C/o ILRI-Ethiopia Campus, Wereda 17, Kebele 21, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
MAIN: Lake Ichkeul in Ichkeul National Park, Tunisia. A World Heritage Site impacted by dams, but taken off the ‘sites in danger list’ in 2006 due the progress of restoration work. © HICHEM AZAFZAF RIGHT: Fisherman searching for his nets in the Sanaga River, Cameroon. © KEVIN SMITH CONTENTS 1.1 Global status of freshwater biodiversity 4 1.1.1 Species diversity 6 1.1.2 Major threats to freshwater species 8 1.2 Situation analysis for Africa 13 1.2.1 General overview 13 1.2.2 Threats to freshwater ecosystems 16 1.2.2.1 Habitat transformation 18 1.2.2.2 Pollution 22 1.2.2.3 Impact of fi sheries 23 1.2.2.4 Invasive alien species 24 1.2.2.5 Climate change 25 1.2.3 The African Green Revolution and wetlands 25 1.3 Functions and values of freshwater ecosystems in Africa 26 1.3.1 Ecosystem functions 26 1.3.2 Ecosystem values 28 4 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND human water right,itis far from clearhowthe waterneeds aside from abouttheimplications ofa legalconcerns demand islikely toexceedthesupplyfrom runoff. Thus, et al planetary limitsfor‘bluewater’runoff resources (Rockström (Alcamo are ofwaterstress causingdramatic changesinpatterns rapid shiftsinanthropogenic wateruseandwithdrawal than halfofglobalsurfacerunoff (Jackson relating toquantity. Humansalready appropriate more aboutwaterqualityareConcerns paralleledbythose around 5,000 child deathsattributabletocontaminatedwaternumber UNICEF 2008).Theresult isaparloussituation,where than 2.5billion)ofpeoplelackadequatesanitation(WHO/ ready accesstodrinkingwater, andperhaps40%(more population (approximately 0.9billionpeople)doesnothave water andsanitation.Asignifi imperative toensure thatallpeopleshouldenjoyadequate may beproblematic, itisimpossibletodisagree withthe recognition thataccesstocleanwaterisahumanright no votesagainsttheresolution. Whileimplementingthe human right.Somecountriesabstained,butthere were access tocleanwaterandsanitationisafundamental Nations (UN)GeneralAssemblyresolution declaringthat On 1August2010,122countriessupportedaUnited 1.1 fundamental right. Girls collectingwaternearBukavu,D.R.Congo.AccordingtotheUnitedNations,accesscleanandsanitationisa . 2009a,b)sothat,withincurrent humanlifetimes, biodiversity Global statusoffreshwater et al . 2008).We maybecloseto overstepping daily ©IUCN/INTUBOEDHIHARTONO (approximately 1.5millionannually). cant proportion oftheEarth’s et al . 2001),and Dudgeon 2010).Forinstance, ithasbeen estimatedthat Revenga species threatened withextinction(e.g., Loh freshwater ecosystems tendtohavethehighestportionof greater thantheirterrestrial ormarinecounterparts,sothat population declinesandlosses from inlandwatersare al for marineandterrestrial biodiversityloss(Rockström an extentthatwehave‘oversteppedplanetaryboundaries’ 2010). Theseexceedbackground extinctionratestosuch Ehrlich andPringle2008;Butchart undergoing anepidemicofhuman-causedextinctions(e.g., that itisnowmore evidentthaneverthatthebiosphere is of Biodiversity. Thisserved,inpart,tohighlightthefact because 2010wasproclaimedYear astheUNInternational right, themidpointof‘Water forLife’decadeisnotable Apart from thepronouncement thatwater isahuman DecadeforAction(2005-2015). Life’ International as amajorachievementoftheUN-designated‘Water for of theMillenniumDevelopmentGoalsintendedtostand people withoutaccesstocleanwaterandsanitationisone matter isurgent, notleastbecausehalvingthenumberof it fl remaining inriversthatsustainswetlandsandestuariesas required byecosystems;forexample,the‘wasted’water needs willhavemajorimplicationsforthesupplyofwater terms. Itneverthelessseemsobviousthatmeetingthese of burgeoning humanpopulationscanbemetinpractical . 2009a,b).Moreover, aconsensushasemerged that ows tothesea.Furthermore –andself-evidentlythe et al . 2005;Dudgeon et al et al . 2006;Strayer and . 2010;Mace et al . 2005; et al et . CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 5 cient to slow the rates cient to slow the . 2002). To achieve this, reliable achieve this, reliable . 2002). To et al © KLAAS-DOUWE DJIKSTRA of population decline and species loss from fresh waters fresh loss from decline and species of population planning, management, One thing is certain: (Strayer 2006). the need to must address processes and decision-making and human environmental between trade-off balance the or risk further biodiversity declines, needs for water, functioning and consequential impairment of ecosystem is a need to In short, there impacts on human livelihoods. habitats as and other freshwater ‘legitimize’ rivers, lakes users of water (Naiman and distribution of freshwater information on the status needed as well as the ecological conditions biodiversity, an essential component of to sustain it, must become Provision planning and water management. environmental a major objective of this report. of such information is phrase ‘the Stiassny (1999) co-opted Marshall McLuhan’s to encapsulate the notion medium is the message’ in order due biodiversity faces unparalleled threats that freshwater subject to unprecedented to dependence on a resource these threats demands. Here, human and ever-increasing so explained, with further discussion on why they are are and what makes the biodiversity associated with severe, waters particularly vulnerable to human impacts. fresh two explanations for are there Beginning with the latter, waters. vulnerability of biodiversity in fresh the relative deal of biodiversity in the small is a great there Firstly, of the globe occupied by rivers, lakes and wetlands. area the in section 1.1.1. Secondly, This point is addressed make their environments of freshwater features inherent by wrought inhabitants especially susceptible to changes considered are humans. The consequences of this matter to the pandemic array of threats in section 1.1.2, where biodiversity is described. freshwater biodiversity that sustains them (Naiman and Dudgeon Dudgeon and them (Naiman sustains that biodiversity that current been expressed have even Doubts 2010). suffi strategies will be conservation . 2008) . 2008) et al ts to be derived . 2005, Strayer 2006; . 2005, Strayer . 2006). One estimate . 2006). One estimate et al in Europe – almost 40% sh et al Moreover, the value of fresh the value of fresh Moreover, . . 2000), and the recently-declared . 2000), and the recently-declared . 2010) et al et al sh and unionid mussels) are threatened threatened are unionid mussels) sh and ood-recession agriculture, and dry-season and dry-season agriculture, ood-recession . 1997) puts the value of ecosystem services . 1997) puts the value . 2000; Revenga . 2000; Revenga . 2007; Strayer and Dudgeon 2010). Freshwater Freshwater and Dudgeon 2010). . 2007; Strayer et al et al shing in the rapids of the Boyoma Falls, on the Lualaba River in D. R. Congo. et al sheries, fl sheries, . 2007) is emblematic of their imperilment. Evidently, of their imperilment. Evidently, . 2007) is emblematic (Costanza waters at USD6.6 trillion annually, by fresh provided and in 20% of the value of all ecosystem combined, ecosystems excess of the worth of all other non-marine smaller extent combined (USD5.7 trillion), despite the far subject to are of inland waters. While valuation estimates waters have fresh the general message that controversy, self-evident. At immense economic importance seems for directly least two billion people depend upon rivers of ecosystem services that can be characterised provision most simply as ‘food’, such as the benefi fi from grazing (Richter Taylor Taylor mammals among the most endangered cetaceans are on Earth (Reeves River dolphin (Turvey of the Yangtze functional extinction et al hotspots of endangerment. waters are fresh component species waters and their Degradation of fresh is a matter for grave concern, and services given the goods them (Dudgeon derived from as ecosystems in the future, waters is bound to increase and their goods and services stressed become more scarcer. human needs It will be a colossal challenge to reconcile of goods and provision for water without compromising functioning ecosystems and the from services that result 20% of the world’s freshwater fi freshwater of the world’s 20% 2007; Jelks Freyhof and USA (Kottelat and the reptiles, and freshwater as many amphibians – as well species macroinvertebrate freshwater and 10,000-20,000 crayfi (especially (Gibbons Wagenia fi Wagenia 6 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND species, makingthem‘ultra-hotspots’ for globalbiodiversity. habitatscoveronly 0.8%oftheEarth’sOkavango Delta channel. Freshwater surface butcontainalmost10%ofalldescribed only contain onlyaround 0.01%oftheEarth’s waterandcover are confi total, thenasmuchone-third ofallvertebratespecies river dolphins,platypus)are addedtothisfreshwater-fi aquatic reptiles (crocodiles, turtles)andmammals(otters, quarter ofglobalvertebratediversity. Whenamphibians, – approximately 40%ofglobalfi more than13,000speciesare fi et al on Earth,around 126,000liveinfresh water(Balian the approximately 1.32millionspeciesthusfardescribed expected from thearea occupiedbyinlandwaters.Of demonstrates thatitisverymuchlarger thanwouldbe incomplete –globalassessment(Balian especially intropical latitudes,butarecent –albeit The biotaoffresh watershasyettobefullyinventoried, 1.1.1 Speciesdiversity global biodiversity(StrayerandDudgeon2010). remaining unglaciatedregions mustbe‘ultra-hotspots’for low biodiversity, itisevidentthatfresh watersinthe situated inrecently-glaciated regions thathaverelatively (see above).Giventhelarge proportion offresh waters explaining whytheyare alsohotspotsofendangerment for globalbiodiversity, andthisgoessomewaytowards al . 2006).Fresh watersasawholeare therefore a‘hotspot’
. 2008)–almost10%oftheglobaltotal.Ofthese, about 0.8%ofthesurface(Gleick1996;Dudgeon ned tofresh water. Yet surfacefreshwater habitats s (Lévêque sh sh diversity, andone et al et al . 2008) . 2008) sh et © JENSKIPPING fi known: between1976and2000,more than300new well-studied freshwater taxaasfi either threatened ortoopoorlyknowntoassess.Evensuch known tobethreatened, atotalof56%amphibiansare as DD.Whenthisfi invertebrates: 25%ofamphibiansare classifi This insuffi rises from 16%to38%. with theadditionofDDcategory, andforcrayfi threatened freshwater crabsincreases from 16%to65% considered tobeatrisk(IUCN2010);theproportion of or thatare toopoorlyknowntoassessadequately) are those forwhichtaxonomicstatusremains uncertain, if speciesclassifi dragonfl et al (Clausnitzer groups globally:dragonfl assessments havebeenmadeforonlythree invertebrate status oftheseanimalsisproblematic. IUCNRed List et al especially intropical latitudes(Dudgeon are particularlynoticeableamonginvertebrates, and improving, large gapsremain (Balian Although knowledgeoffreshwater biodiversity is sh species,approximately 1%ofknownfi . 2009),andcrayfi . 2008).Accordingly, determinationofconservation ies are threatened, theproportion risesto40% ciency ofknowledgeisnotconfi et al ed as‘DataDefi . 2009),freshwater crabs(Cumberlidge gure iscombinedwith thepercentage sh (IUCN2010).Whileonly14%of ies (asampledassessment) cient’ (DD:essentially, shes are incompletely et al et al . 2008).They . 2006;Balian ed byIUCN se, were shes, nd to ned s it sh CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 7
ects . 2004), ect the ies and et al . 2005; Chapter . 2006), and this diversity) between et al B et al . 2002; Benda ect the degree of isolation ect the degree et al . 2008). The high endemism results . 2008). The high endemism results uence patterns, gradients, or stream et al . 2005, Dudgeon . 2002), because there can be large ‘stream ‘stream can be large . 2002), because there et al et al ies (Balian contributes to regional species richness. contributes to regional Local endemism and high species turnover refl species to disperse through limited ability of most freshwater river to river along or to migrate from landscapes terrestrial arrangement of riverine the hierarchical the coast. Moreover, habitats means that the populations and communities connected to – or isolated differentially they harbour are (Fagan – each other from networks that depend on with abilities to disperse through the vagaries of confl barriers such as waterfalls. Geographic of the presence refl distance may appropriately which distance, stream whereas habitats, among terrestrial than straight-line distance, refl is often much larger habitats. Thus, among stream of isolation the degree tend to be isolated habitats for fully headwater streams geographically proximate aquatic species, even if they are (Gomi several major groups, including decapod crustaceans, several major groups, caddisfl molluscs and aquatic insects such as mayfl in considerable species turnover (= is cichlid basins or catchments. An outstanding example of hundreds lakes, where diversity in African Rift Valley found (Thieme endemic species are The fundamental point is that because 3 in this report). water bodies tend not to be of high species turnover, to their faunal assemblages ‘substitutable’ with respect (Revenga cation . 2008). . 2006), et al et al . 2000). More strikingly, strikingly, . 2000). More et al . 2000; Brooks . 2000; Brooks et al rmation that terrestrial and freshwater and freshwater rmation that terrestrial sh species (Sverdrup-Jensen 2002), more 2002), more sh species (Sverdrup-Jensen © MCKAY SAVAGE © MCKAY . 2008). Regional discovery rates of new freshwater freshwater . 2008). Regional discovery rates of new rst attempt at mapping global freshwater ecoregions and ecoregions rst attempt at mapping global freshwater despite the evidence that they are highly threatened and highly threatened despite the evidence that they are the lack of any confi hotspots overlap (Strayer and Dudgeon 2010). waters so rich in biodiversity? A few fresh Why are geographic ranges, but have large species freshwater habitats has led to the of freshwater the insular nature evolution of many species with small geographic ranges, often encompassing just a single lake or drainage basin (Strayer 2006; Strayer and Dudgeon 2010). High levels of local endemism and species richness seem typical of This is an important development, as previous global This is an important development, as previous freshwater ignored biodiversity assessments have largely species (e.g., Myers formally described or resurrected from synonymy each from formally described or resurrected year (Stiassny 1999; Lundberg 40% of the global total of 6,696 amphibian approximately two decades species has been described during the last likely are 2010). The equivalent proportions (AmphibiaWeb invertebrates, with substantial for freshwater to be more (Balian tens of thousands of species awaiting description et al Investigations in the Mekong species also vary widely. may support as drainage, for example, suggest that it many as 1,700 fi total of earlier estimates. Identifi times the than three richness particularly high freshwater that support of areas the and realm, for the terrestrial has lagged behind efforts fi (Abell recently hotspots was unveiled relatively A polluted canal in Chennai, India. Pollution of waterways from urban centresA polluted canal in Chennai, India. Pollution is a major threat to freshwater systems and their biodiversity. 8 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND consequences willbe furthercompounded byglobal interactions between thesethreats or stressors, andtheir example (Hecky impacts ofNilePerch inLakeVictoria beinganegregious present anadditional threat tofreshwater biodiversity–the non-native oralienspecies(reviewed byStrayer2010) al global problem (reviewed byAllan addition, overexploitation offi for organisms (reviewed byDudgeon humans inwaysthatcompromise itsvalueasahabitat may beextracted,diverted,containedorcontaminatedby arises from thefactthatfresh wateris a resource that notion thatthevulnerabilityoffreshwater biodiversity ‘The mediumisthemessage’effectively conveysthe 1.1.2 Majorthreats tofreshwater species by humanactivities,asdescribedbelow. contribute toitsvulnerabilitythemanythreats generated Thus, thefeatures generatingfreshwater biodiversityalso local extinctionevents(Cook of recolonization orrecovery followingperturbationsor (through evolutionofendemism),butalsoinfl and/or isolationoffresh waterscancontributetorichness overland dispersalremains. Thehierarchical architecture lakes orotherstanding-waterbodies,buttheproblem of appropriate measure ofthedegree ofisolationamong distances’ betweenthem.Geographicdistanceisamore biodiversity andimpactingthewatersuppliestoKunmingCity. Algal bloomsinLakeDianchi,China.Industrialanddomesticpollutionhasledtotheeutrophicationoflake,threatening . 2006;Wong et al et al . 2007),whileintroductions ofexotic . 2010).There willbecomplicated et al shes andotheranimalsisa . 2007;Lake et al . 2005;Dudgeon et al uences rates uences et al . 2006).In . 2007). et ©GREENPEACECHINA as ‘receivers’ (Ward 1989).Forexample, pollution from so thatfl affected byupstream processes, includingperturbation, downstream assemblages instreams andriversare complex direct and indirect pathways.Furthermore, and catchmentconditionimpacts biodiversityviamultiple and riversare landscape ‘receivers’ (Dudgeon that are associatedwith biodiversitylosses.Inshort,lakes in eutrophication, toxicalgalblooms,fi extinction overlongertimescales.Pollutantsmayresult lethal effects andphysiologicalimpairmentthatmaycause biota bypoisoningandhabitatdegradation,sub- runoff andsoon,leadingtodirect patterns mortalityof can leadtosedimentation,pollutionbynutrients,changed areas. Landtransformationforagriculture orurbanization very signifi diversity oflakes,streams andriverstobedetermineda biodiversity isaresult ofthetendencyforintegrityand The multiplicityofhumanimpactsonfreshwater (Olden species concerned species are particulartolocalcircumstances andthe are at-riskduetooverfi be atgreatest riskofextinctionglobally, buttheformer largest andsmallestspeciesoffreshwater fi and consequentialextinctionrisks.Forexample,boththe predict likelyoutcomes(Moss2010;Ormerod runoff andprecipitationThismakesitdiffi patterns. climate changeleadingtorisingtemperatures andshiftsin owing-water habitats are ‘transmitters’ aswell cant extentbytheconditionoftheircatchment shing, whilethreats tothesmallest et al . 2007). sh killsandsoon sh appearto et al et al cult to cult . 2010) . 2006) CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 9
ow ow ows. hidrovias oods and ow regime . 2007). Some ow conditions . 2005). Another et al et al oods and droughts) oods and droughts) . 2002; Matthews and Marsh- ow variability as undesirable or – sh and other organisms, whereas whereas and other organisms, sh et al . 2007). The consequences of the of the . 2007). The consequences et al ve times the volume of all the world’s rivers ve times the volume of all the world’s uxes are also typical of biologically-diverse also typical of biologically-diverse uxes are . 2007). Even species that occur in multiple lake lake occur in multiple that Even species . 2007). et al ed by the construction of dams (e.g., Nilsson ed by the construction of . 2005), and the interaction of this anthropogenic . 2005), and the interaction of this anthropogenic uvial navigation as industrial waterways or waterways industrial as uvial navigation ciency throughout drainage networks (especially drainage networks ciency throughout ow is problematic is that all fresh waters are spatially waters are is that all fresh ow is problematic for fl (Wong (Wong locally- by endemic, may be represented or river systems or individual water bodies lineages within adapted genetic units that unique taxonomic These represent drainages. genetic and mixing of due to interbreeding will be lost interbasin water transfers can accompany lineages that (Moritz 2002). with impacts can be transferred It is a paradox that effi – the complex yet – as mentioned above downstream), such networks and the isolation of water of architecture from and recovery resilience bodies tends to constrain impacts (Lake greatly waters are of fresh nature fragmented and insular magnifi et al network fragmentation and the geometry of the drainage aquatic the persistence of threatened affect can strongly species (e.g., Fagan impacts Matthews 2007). The extent of such dam-related of dam-based is very substantial: a global overview half (172 out of that over revealed rivers impacts on large fl by fragmentation, with the greatest affected 292) were (Nilsson River in the Volta regulation of global fl indication of the extent of human alteration the over 10,000km3 of water, is that dams retain regimes equivalent of fi trap 25% 2000), while reservoirs (Nilsson and Berggren the oceans it reaches of the total sediment load before (Vörösmarty and Sahagian 2000). of why alteration and regulation A fundamental reason fl variability in and temporally dynamic systems, exhibiting or other aspects of water regime, inundation discharge, on diurnal, as well as light and temperature, seasonal and variability in sediment timescales. Temporal inter-annual and nutrient fl and interact with fl ecosystems, freshwater (including disturbances such as fl to maintain habitat diversity and ecosystem processes, persistence and richness of native enhance and thereby species (Bunn and Arthington 2002; Poff adapted to ephemeral or intermittent of these species are for part of the year only, is present water systems, where inundation or fl perennial require others whereas and/or associated Seasonal peaks in the hydrograph or turbidity may represent changes in temperature cues for fi reproductive only during low-fl some species may recruit 2004). and Poff (Bunn and Arthington 2002; Lytle fl Humans tend to treat (for example, fl – disastrous cases in extreme modify or engineer freshwater and therefore drought), ow shes . 2010). Further ooding (Lytle and ooding (Lytle et al shing have caused . 2002). Migratory fi et al ow of water. Examples include ow of water. oodplains by limiting or severing their oodplains via seasonal inundation during high- oodplains via seasonal shes or shrimps that breed in estuaries, thereby resulting resulting in estuaries, thereby or shrimps that breed shes fry with limited genetic variability sh or hatchery-reared ow periods (Ward 1989). Many riverine or wetland species 1989). Many riverine ow periods (Ward upstream is transmitted downstream, thereby spreading spreading thereby downstream, transmitted is upstream Disturbances intact reaches. to otherwise impacts potential can also be transmitted riverine biodiversity that threaten against the fl upstream migration of upstream dams that impede downstream fi in headwaters of whole assemblages in extirpation and overfi (Pringle 2001). Dams losses of salmon runs in rivers along declines or complete America, leading to reductions the west coast of North marine-derived nutrients with major in ‘uphill’ transfer of in production and riparian consequences for in-stream headwaters (e.g., Gende degrades fl regulation in turn,connection with the river channel which, impacts and of aquatic species (Lytle migration and reproduction 2004). Changes to riparian zones or river banks Poff transfers of energy disrupt food webs and the reciprocal and aquatic habitats and nutrients between terrestrial (Nakano and Murakami 2001; Fausch impact can be attributed to susceptibility to anthropogenic waters ground the fact that exchanges between surface and fundamental for maintaining the integrity of freshwater are surface and ground ecosystems although, typically, 1989). (Ward managed as separate resources waters are freshwater connectivity between the inherent In summary, that catchments ensures bodies and their surrounding can originate well beyond lake or to biodiversity threats connectivity allows river banks, and within-river hydrologic and upstream impacts to be transmitted both downstream the relatively from (Pringle 2001). This is markedly different of most human impacts in terrestrial localized effects landscapes. One category of human impacts that is peculiar to inland to species endemism at the basin waters is the threat scale posed by transfer of alien species among river systems (e.g., deliberate stocking with non-indigenous fi Strayer 2010), and the particular threat by – see review and mixing of formerly isolated ‘introduction’ arising from interbasin water large-scale through about species brought of rivers planned or ongoing transfers and interconnection in China, India, southern For Africa and the Neotropics. instance, the La Plata River System is listed as one of on account of plans the ten rivers most at risk globally, Orinoco and Amazon Rivers to connect the Paraguay, (alewives, eels, salmon and shad) have likewise declined (alewives, eels, salmon of abundance in historic levels from by as much as 98% and Waldman (Limburg seaboard rivers along the Atlantic 2009). the linkage between rivers Further complexity arises from and their fl fl adapted to and dependent on such fl are 2004). Levee construction, channelization and fl Poff 10 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND and rivers isaprerequisite for protecting freshwater Maintaining the dynamicandvariablenature ofstreams habitat (Bunn and Arthington2002;Poff fl reproduction (Lytle andPoff 2004), a‘fl As wellasleadingtoaloss of hydrographic cuesfor bodies toincrease predictability andcontrol variability. water, theequivalentoffi Riano Dam,Spain.Anindicationoftheextenthumanalteration ofglobalfl ows limitsthefl uvial disturbanceneededtorejuvenate ve timesthevolume ofalltheworld’s rivers. attening’ ofpeak et al . 2007). e-fl regionally-specifi While newandinnovative strategiestodevelop paradigm aimedatcontrolling hydrological variability. challenge giventhecontextof aresource management biodiversity (Poff 2010; Poff ows) are beingdeveloped(Arthington © FELIPEGABALDON over10,000km³of isthatdamsretain ow regimes et al . 2010), including holistic methodsused in c environmental waterallocations(or et al . 1997),butpresents aformidable et al . 2006, CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 11 . et et sh et al . 2009) (see also Chapter shing leading to reductions in leading to reductions shing et al . 2005b; Parmesan 2006; Heino . 2010). The term ‘ecosocial anomie’ et al uenced nutrient transfer, food webs and uenced nutrient transfer, . 2005). Hydrological changes, caused . 2005). Hydrological et al ows is evidence of growing awareness of awareness of growing evidence ows is shers can be affected by baseline shift within shers can be affected et al (IPCC 2007), and will have profound oods and droughts ect conditions in the intermediate and distant past: i.e.,ect conditions in the intermediate and distant . 2009). Warmer temperatures will have direct metabolic will have direct temperatures . 2009). Warmer . 2004). Allowing for some differences in scale or intensity in scale or intensity differences . 2004). Allowing for some al and could impact organisms on ectothermic effects thermal tolerances (e.g., Poff species with narrow 2001; Allan by changes in the amount and timing of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and glacial melting, may also be and severity in the frequency associated with an increase of fl Temperature biodiversity. implications for freshwater may be smaller than those further in the tropics increases (IPCC 2007), but this does not mean the equator from 8, section 8.6.1, this volume). Evidence for impacts on in the form of warmer has appeared waters already fresh and changes in periods of ice cover, shorter temperatures, animals the geographic ranges or phenology of freshwater by Allan (reviewed Research on e-fl on Research importantly, more and, biodiversity to freshwater threats it must be them. However, address an attempt to represents not are biodiversity that declines in freshwater emphasized have been waters on fresh phenomenon. Impacts a recent of places and, in the case centuries in some sustained over 4,000 persisted for over rivers in China, have many major fi freshwater Declines in European years (Dudgeon 2000). have been attributed to a combination 1000AD around from nutrient increased intensive agriculture, of siltation from dams, introduction of mill loads and pollution, proliferation overfi of exotic species, and 2005; Barrett 1996, (Hoffmann mean size and abundance al that threaten much the same factors of action, these are Historical losses of salmon, biodiversity today. freshwater American rivers are North from beaver and unionid mussels certain to have infl (Humphries and Winemiller 2009; dynamics organic-matter well 2009). Such impacts occurred and Waldman Limburg any formal stock assessments, giving rise to the before that conditions in the immediate past false impression refl the extent deception, and thus a tendency to underestimate (Humphries of human impacts, due to a ‘shifting baseline’ is not just aand Winemiller 2009). The shifting baseline species and charismatic large matter of historic interest: exploited by fi species are the span of a human generation; when these rapidly basis, they are on a fairly regular not encountered (Turvey forgotten in expectations has been used to describe this breakdown waters, and in fresh of what species should be present and (Limburg in their preservation societal loss of interest 2009). Waldman to present Human-caused climate change is certain and now biodiversity, to freshwater threat a profound dominates discussions about the fate of ecosystems marine, and and conservation planning in the terrestrial, (Heino realms freshwater cation of dam operations to mitigate their impacts cation of dam operations to have been reported (Richter and Thomas 2007; Olden (Richter and Thomas 2007; Olden have been reported and Naiman 2010). Asia and Africa that attempt to strike a balance between (King and Brown protection development and resource scales 2006, 2010), their implementation at appropriate will be challenging. Nonetheless, some successes with modifi 12 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND forced more than20millionpeoplefrom theirhomes. forced more monsoonrainfallin2010that Flooding acrossvasttractsoflandinPakistan'sSindhprovince,sixmonthsonfromtheextreme where drainage basinsare oriented east–west. One compensatory movements northorsouthare notpossible limited inhuman-dominated environments. Moreover, and amphibiansmightfi terrestrial landscape (Dudgeon 2007).Evenfl fully aquaticspeciesthatcannot movethrough the altitudes are oftennot possible,especiallyforthemany into coolerhabitatsfurtherfrom theequatorortohigher to climatechangebywayofcompensatorymovements Given theinsularnature offreshwater habitats, adaptations and reduced adultfi temperatures willleadtosmallersizeatmetamorphosis invertebrates) hastheimportantimplicationthatwarmer growth andbodysizeinamphibians(andmanyaquatic The inverserelationship betweentemperature during close totheiruppertolerancelimits(Deutsch affected byrisingtemperatures, sincethey mayalready be fi that tropical ectotherms(‘cold-blooded’animalssuchas sh andamphibiansaswellinvertebrates)willbeless tness (e.g.,Semlitsch nd theirdispersalopportunities et al ying insects ying et al . 1988). . 2008). © DFID–UKDEPARTMENT FORINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT thermal range(Dudgeon2007;Hoegh-Guldberg species from warmingwaterbodiestohabitatswithintheir would betranslocationoraidedmigrationofthreatened conservation initiativethatcouldhelpaddress thisproblem and water diversionsto enhancewater securityforpeople Palmer solutions tomitigate theseproblems (Dudgeon2007; life andproperty, effects thatwillencourageengineering exacerbate water-supply shortagesandthreaten human be asstrong orevengreater. Climatechangewillcreate or to thisclimatechangecouldgive risetoimpactsthatwill biodiversity overthecomingcentury, buthumanresponses Climate changewillhavestrong direct effects onfreshwater with alienspecies(StrayerandDudgeon2010). or leadingtotheecologicalimpactsoftypeassociated climate change),andposetheriskoftransferringdiseases for onlyatinyfractionoffreshwater speciesthreatened by detailed informationaboutthespecies(whichisavailable Such actionswouldbecontroversial andcostly, requiring et al . 2008),including newdams,dredging, levees, et al . 2008). CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 13 et oodplains of ed – extinction ed – extinction . 2006), and demonstrate how human how human and demonstrate . 2006), et al . 2010). Extinctions are likely to continue over the next to continue over the likely are . 2010). Extinctions al resulting of actions taken now, regardless few decades, – and unquantifi unredeemed large a from by habitat instance, be incurred ‘debt’. This could, for populations that are the viability of fragmentation reducing (Matthews of dwindling to extinction now in the process 2007; Strayer and Dudgeon 2010). and Marsh-Matthews In June 2010, 85 so. but not entirely The outlook is bleak, Science to establish an Intergovernmental nations agreed and Ecosystem Services policy platform on Biodiversity is intended to The IPBES Korea. (IPBES) in Busan, South Change Panel on Climate the Intergovernmental mirror on declines in(IPCC), and will work to integrate data with thebiodiversity and degradation of ecosystems them (Larigauderie to reverse government action required global- and Mooney 2010). The IPBES will co-ordinate on the status and trends of research scale peer reviews and provide of biodiversity and ecosystem services to and policy recommendations reports ‘gold standard’ governments. of the IPBES will require Formal establishment but the initial by the UN General Assembly, agreement was an important initiative for the Internationalagreement a conduit will also provide The IPBES of Biodiversity. Year such as this can achieve wider currency by which reports inform conservation action. and thereby 1.2 Situation analysis for Africa 1.2.1 General overview the muddy waters of the Congo River spilling From to the vast fl into equatorial swamp forests the deep the Inner Niger Delta or Okavango Delta, from and shallow lakes of the Rift lakes in eastern Africa to of the Namib or Sahara deserts, from ephemeral streams basins to the mountain and the equatorial and perennial or South Africa, the inland coastal rivers of the Maghreb diverse. incredibly waters of Africa are has been For a long time, the African environment threats. serious anthropogenic from preserved relatively presently This is no longer the case, and several threats with and biological resources, both the hydrological affect biodiversity in some areas the rate of loss of freshwater to be high. For example, Begg (1988) suspected already showed that in the Mfolozi catchment of Natal, South had been lost Africa, 58% of the original wetland area by the mid-1980s. Another well-known example is from at the beginning of the 1980s, some where, Lake Victoria, to have reported 70% of the endemic cichlid species were and Lowe-McConnell 1994). (Worthington disappeared extent to which current practices are unsustainable unsustainable are practices current to which extent (Dudgeon have of inland waters and impairment exploitation management (Ormerod our best attempts at outpaced et oods. . 2008; Strayer et al . (2009) assert, it is evident that we must also have far oods associated with rainfall extremes) when there may when there oods associated with rainfall extremes) and agriculture and provide protection from fl from protection and provide and agriculture impetus to install new is increasing In addition, there dependence along rivers to reduce facilities hydropower needs. The global energy on fossil fuels and meet growing will ecological impacts of such engineering responses impacts of climate change, especially if magnify the direct to disasters (such as severe in response initiated they are fl reviews environmental be a temptation to circumvent need for project of the urgent because and regulations implementation (Dudgeon 2007; Palmer al would have been sustainable exceeded whatever margins Indeed, the extent of the biodiversity. for freshwater biodiversity that have declines and losses of freshwater indicator of the a reliable been documented is probably and Dudgeon 2010). planetary boundaries for transgressed If we have already biodiversity loss, as Rockström and marine terrestrial 14 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND (redrawn from Beadle1981). Figure 1.1.ThegeneraltopographyofAfrica,showing theapproximate divisionbetweenHighandLowAfrica have a long evolutionary historycompared to temperate Africa isanancient continent,where freshwater systems Geology andgeography characteristics, biodiversityand values. the baselinedataonwetlandarea, distribution,seasonality, As aresult, updatedinventories are necessarytoimprove Africa,arethe CongoBasinandeastern stillpoorlyknown. been reasonably wellinvestigated,whileothers,suchas Africa,have Some areas,andwestern suchassouthern knowledge offreshwater systemsisquiteheterogeneous. aquatic faunaisstillratherpoorlyknown.Moreover, our with humanhealth(e.g.,diseasevectors),theAfrican (for example,fi Except forafewgroups ofeconomicallyimportantspecies shes andshrimps)orspeciesassociated most ancient lakesinthe world,suchas LakeTanganyika Valley, aresult oftectonicevents, includessomeofthe is mainlyover1,000m abovesealevel.Thefamous Rift sea level.Incontrast,HighAfrica tothesouthandeast sedimentary basinsandupland plainsbelow600mabove 1981) (Figure 1.1).Low Africaislargely composedof can broadly bedivided intoLowandHighAfrica(Beadle Taking intoaccountthecurrent relief, theAfrican continent events, combinedwiththeimpactsofclimatechanges. continent hasbeendeterminedlargely bythesegeologic present distributionoffreshwater species across the activity, mainlyduringthepast20millionyears.The that haveresulted from landtransformation, bytectonic zones. Theyoffer ahighnumberandvarietyofhabitats CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 15 ned a biogeographic . 2008). estimate ora. A preliminary et al nal set of 11 bioregions and nal set of 11 bioregions conservation biology sh, freshwater ned for application to Africa’s freshwater freshwater ned for application to Africa’s nities at higher taxonomic levels. Based on nities at higher taxonomic levels. Based on © KLAAS-DOUWE DJIKSTRA . 2005). Furthermore, they defi . 2005). Furthermore, province, or bioregion, as a complex of ecoregions that as a complex of ecoregions or bioregion, province, history and so often have a similar biogeographic share affi strong existing knowledge of fi a fi and aquatic entomology, for Africa was delineated (Figure ecoregions 79 freshwater FADA provides a global overview of genus and species- a global provides FADA inland waters at level diversity of animals and plants in the information the continental level. Within continental Africa, biogeographical two large has been compiled across south of the Sahara and Madagascar belong to areas; to the north while the Maghreb region, the Afrotropical combining the Through region. belongs to the Palearctic it is possible to obtain an information for these two regions, freshwater estimate for the diversity of the aquatic African studied) and fl fauna (58 groups species occur in that at least 16,789 freshwater proposes and alone (including Madagascar region the Afrotropical islands) (Balian other offshore Main ecological zones in Africa attempts to delineate geographic have been several There Africa based on the origins and similarities of across areas of these is based on the aquatic fauna. The most recent (Olson and Dinerstein 1998), which concept the ecoregion has been refi of land or water containing a area ecosystems as a large distinct assemblage of natural communities and species, the original extent of whose boundaries approximate major land use change (Thieme natural communities before et al Fish catch in a bucket, caught in the Lower Itimbiri River in D. Fish catch in a bucket, caught in the Lower Asia and South R. Congo. Fish diversity in Africa rivals that of America. 2008). oods. Little is known et al. Jg\Z`\j`ek_\Jgfkc`^_k
fZbf]]i\j_nXk\iZiXYj`eCXb\ sh fauna (Lévêque and Paugy 2006), ows and lake levels. Evidently, these large these large ows and lake levels. Evidently, , this volume). sh and invertebrates (Worthington and Lowe- and (Worthington sh and invertebrates uence the ecology of the continent and its uence the ecology of the continent . 2008). In addition, the existence of diverse species 8le`hl\jg\Z`\jÕ sh diversity, reported to include more than 3,000 species, to include more reported diversity, sh a special additional ’living fossils‘ provides ocks and relict One to other continents. sh families in Africa as compared ocks of fi Æ KXe^Xep`bX1 X df[\c ]fi jkl[`\j\ok`eZk`fe `e \mfclk`fe Xe[ Climate and hydrology importance in determining the The climate is of utmost Africa, systems. Within tropical distribution of aquatic (i) equatorial: hot major climatic types prevail: three hot with rainy seasons; (ii) tropical: and humid with two arid. In the north hot and subtropical: summer rain; and (iii) with climate types also occur, and south, Mediterranean rains. The amount of rain and arid summers and winter within greatly the year varies its distribution throughout in rainfall Africa. Both within and between year variations determine river fl spatial and temporal patterns in rainfall and temperature infl greatly aquatic organisms. 30 central Africa almost entirely covered Rainforest between 16 million years ago, but savannas expanded years remained and 8 million years ago. The last million than now for 80- with less rainforest changeable and dry, the continents 90% of the time. Just 12,000 years ago, While the area. only 10% of the current covered rainforest 8,000 years Sahara was dotted with swamps and lakes arid phase culminated only 2,500- ago, the most recent less rainfall Africa still receives present. 2,000 years before seasonal and and what does fall is more than other tropics, and fl droughts with frequent irregular, such constant about the long-term consequences of aridity and seasonal fauna. Increasing shifts for freshwater instance, could variability within and between years, for areas. affected extinction rates in more lead to increasing biodiversity Freshwater of geographic, climatic the combined effects Altogether, and topographic factors have given rise to a high diversity freshwater and assemblages. Africa’s species of freshwater fi than 3,600 species known) and rivals that of Asia (more than 4,200 species known) (Lévêque South America (more et al fl value to the African fi and there are an unusually high number of primary division are and there fi phylogenetic diversity may be for this exceptional reason that the African continent has not been totally submerged, at least for the last 600 million years (Lévêque 2001). Information on the diversity of other taxonomic groups Animal Diversity the Freshwater is compiled through (Balian project Assessment (FADA) (12 million years old (Fryer 1991)) and Lakes Malawi and and Lakes Malawi 1991)) and old (Fryer years (12 million species to unique given rise has evolution where Victoria, fl McConnell 1994) (also see McConnell 16 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND Figure 1.2.Freshwater ecoregions ofcontinentalAfrica. rainfall to runoff, itisclearthat large areas ofAfricaface rate (around 65%ofrainfall),and lowconversionof Given theunpredictable rainfall,very highevaporation species; pollution;andoverexploitation. extraction andhydrological disruption;invasivealien scale, including:habitatloss or transformation;water ecosystems are recognised tooperateatthecontinental A numberofanthropogenic threats to freshwater 1.2.2 Threats tofreshwater ecosystems and Paugy2006;2010). fl corresponding totheGreat Lakesendemic fauna(species 1.2). Twelve provinces andseveral’hotspotprovinces‘ ocks) were delineatedforfi sh (Skelton1994;Lévêque and Richter2003; resulting inimpairmentoftheirecologicalfunction(Postel as dams,fl large wetlands havebeenaffected bydevelopments,such to meettheincreasing demandforwaterandpower, many demands forreliable andsafewatersupplies.Inaneffort water managementdiffi with an estimated 85% ofAfrica’s total water withdrawals total waterconsumption from rivers, lakesandaquifers, agriculture orindustryaccountsfor alarge partofthe (Darwall Africa particularly trueforareas andsouthern ofnorthern being lowered andwetland areas disappearing;thisis they canbereplenished, resulting inthewatertable to provide irrigation for agriculture, atafasterratethan 2006). Groundwater reserves are beingused,mostoften et al ood control measures, ordirect abstraction, . 2009;Garcia culties insatisfyingthegrowing et al et al . 2003;Dudgeon . 2010).Abstractionfor et al . CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 17 .
et al shes in c impacts to other taxonomic groups are are c impacts to other taxonomic groups oodplains, with a consequent impact on oodplains, with a consequent cation is often inadequate or non-existent (Saad and their fl domestic sewage Pollution from associated biodiversity. in many a major problem and industrial facilities is already for water required the infrastructure parts of Africa where purifi 1994; Lévêque 1997; UNEP 2004). in more treated are each of these threats The impacts from a discussion of impacts on fi through detail below, Specifi particular. 3 to 7. in Chapters also covered © MANGUS FRANKLIN Polluted water from a leather tannery in Addis Ababa mixing with the Akaki river. Industrial water pollution is major threat to Polluted water from a leather tannery in Addis Ababa mixing with the Akaki river. freshwater biodiversity in many parts of Africa. directed toward agriculture (FAO 2010a), and about one- (FAO agriculture toward directed estimated to be under agricultural area of its surface third compound existing 2010b). To land use in 2000 (FAO Africa is poised to embark on water resources, pressures scale of development within its on an unprecedented in irrigated land a 100% increase targeting water sector, 7% to 25% of total hydropower from and an increase area, by 2025 (Economic Commission for potential captured these agricultural lands from runoff Africa 2003). Water brings sediments, nutrients and pesticides that can functioning of wetlands the effective or reduce destroy 18 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 2005; biodiversity are welldocumented (e.g., Nilsson The impactsof large damsonecosystemfunctions and production (Figure 1.4). including, irrigation,watersupply (domesticuse)orfi have beenestablishedtomeet otherwaterdemands More recently, probably thousandsofsmallerreservoirs the mid1950s,onlarge riversandforelectricitysupply. hydroelectricity. Mostofthelargest damswere built after industrial andminingwatersupply, crop irrigation and built forarangeofpurposes,includingdomestic, proposed. Large damsorsecondaryhavebeen many more are eitherunderconstruction orhavebeen Africa(FigureMaghreb, andwestern 1.3), southern Africa hasalarge numberofdams,particularlyinthe Dams (waterfragmentation) 1.2.2.1 Habitattransformation from FAO, Aquastat2010a). Figure 1.3.Locationof135largedams(
McAllister et al. 2001;McCartney et al r 500,000m³)and1,072secondarydams( of ecosystem valuesdoes occur, through thecreation ecosystems. In somecases,however, enhancement cases, tosignifi more negativethanpositive andtheyhaveled,inmany Dams 2000):’Onbalance,the ecosystemimpactsare the World CommissiononDams (World Commissionon up through oneofthe mainconclusionsoftheReport of itsconstruction.Thenature oftheseimpactsissummed taken before buildingadam,andinthesubsequentdesign treated ascoststosocietyandbefactored intodecisions The ecosystemimpactsfrom damsshould,therefore, be many hundreds ofkilometres from thesiteofdam. quality. Suchchangesinecosystemfunctionscanbefelt changes tothefl for someaquaticspecies.Downstream impactsinclude submerged habitats,andblockthemigrationpathways and sedimentsalongrivers,permanentlydestroy upstream constitute obstaclestolongitudinalexchangeofnutrients cant andirreversible lossofspecies and ow regime, water temperature andwater CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 19 . et al . 2005). et al ow. © INTERNATIONAL RIVERS © INTERNATIONAL An aerial view of the Inga Dam on the Congo River which, due to lack of maintenance, was running at an estimated 20% capacity in 2006. was realised that Grand Inga Dam would create a lake so that Grand Inga Dam would create was realised both Kinshasa and Congo that it would submerge large environmental Brazzaville and would cause ’irreversible at the river mouth‘. harm to all living matter and organisms disruptions to the Congo River The potentially catastrophic to of threats and the Atlantic Ocean interaction, in terms The also realised. global carbon and water cycles, were empty into Amazon, Orinoco and Congo rivers, which of the world the Atlantic, combined contribute 15-18% carbon inputs (Coynel total organic ocean’s Inga III and IV were proposed in 2009 as ’run of the river‘ proposed Inga III and IV were that do not disrupt the river fl structures For a few major impoundments in Africa, the sequence after damming has been studied (e.g., Jackson rst culty of coping shing and recreational shing and recreational nal 96m to sea level, the channel ow through a bank of electricity generators ow through cant falls or rapids close to its mouth. Furthermore, its mouth. Furthermore, cant falls or rapids close to ow (after the Amazon), but it is the only major river with as the river drops its fi as the river drops bend – this makes a 180 degrees and its course narrows is Inga Falls. The Grand Inga scheme would divert the this a channel cutting across lower Congo River through bend, to fl river to its natural course. Grand Inga returning the before twice as much power as has been calculated to produce Dam, with the potential for export to Gorges Three China’s to Grand Inga, Inga I and II were As a precursor Europe. to constitute constructed in 1972 and 1982, respectively, generating capacity. hydroelectric second largest Africa’s dams, lack of large As is the fate of many of the world’s operating at maintenance meant that by 2006 both were Plans for the massive an estimated 20% of total capacity. for in 2009 with proposals replaced Grand Inga Dam were a Grand Inga Cascades, once the potentially catastrophic It recognised. of Grand Inga were impacts environmental of new wetland habitat and the fi to date Efforts by new reservoirs… opportunities provided dams have to counter the ecosystem impacts of large of attention to met with limited success due to the lack the poor quality anticipating and avoiding such impacts, the diffi and uncertainty of predictions, and with all impacts, and the only partial implementation success of mitigation measures.’ on the Congo is the Grand Inga projects One of the largest the waters River (Showers 2009). The idea of diverting electricity generators was fi of the Congo through periodically in the 1920s and has been revived proposed second largest since that time. The Congo has the world’s fl signifi Figure 1.4. Main purposes of dams in Africa (data from FAO, Aquastat 2010a). Aquastat FAO, (data from in Africa of dams purposes 1.4. Main Figure 20 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND Figure 1.5.ReductioninthesizeofLakeChadover theperiod1963to2007.Source: Musa the shores of reservoirs, infection canreach epidemic Nigeria indicate thatamongstcommunitiesresettled along disease (seealso Chapter4,thisvolume).Examples from providing favourable conditions fortransmissionofthe with artifi for thedisease,breed inslow-fl malaria. Snails,whichrepresent theintermediatehost to bethesecondmostdamaging economicallyafter of theseisschistosomiasis,aparasiticdiseaseconsidered vectors ofcertainimportantdiseases.Themostcommon reservoir provides more extensivehabitatsfortheaquatic with damconstructionarise,inparticular, astheupstream In tropical regions, problems ofpublichealthassociated small clupeids. by otherspeciesfavouringlacustrineconditions,suchas populations adaptedtorunningwaters,andreplacement fl is clearthatthetransformationofecosystemfrom ultimate stateadoptedbythefi ultimately decreases sharply. Itisdiffi fi and epiphyticalgaeincrease. However, thisexpansionof the sameway, algalgrazersdowell,asphytoplanktonic new conditions,andsupportsanincrease innumbers.In food formostofthegeneralistfeedersthatdowellin which are favoured bydrowned trees, becomesabasic of larvaeandnymphs lacustrine conditions.Forexample,thehighproliferation increase inthepopulationsofthosefi Soon aftertheclosure ofadam,there isasubstantial those observedinnorthtemperateman-madelakes. 1988) and,ingeneral,theimpactsare different from uviatile tolacustrineresults inthedisappearanceoffi sh populationsdoesnotlastlongandthefi cial lakesassociatedwithdamconstruction Povilla adusta owing orstagnantwater, sh community, butit shspeciesfavouring cult topredict the (Ephemeroptera), sh biomass sh sh over-abstraction anddiversion ofwaterfor agriculture, in and desertifi 5% ofitsvolume sincethe1960s,duetoboth drought vividly illustratedbyLakeChad, which hasshrunktoaround in otherpartsofAfrica.Thescale oftheproblem ismost agricultural uses,althoughthe problem isalsopresent by theover-abstraction ofwaterforurban,industrial and Africaare andsouthern bothheavily impacted Northern Water abstraction lower Volta (AkosomboDam,Ghana)(Petr1986). (Ryder 1978),andadeclineinoysterpopulationsthe fi has beenobserved,forexample,asadrasticdeclinein salinity (Jackson of nutrientsfl as areduction offreshwater infl reductions inestuarineandfreshwater fi Larger water-diversion projects inAfricahavealsoledto observed intemperateregions. and differ substantiallyfrom impactsofimpoundments societal impactsofalltheseeffects are veryimportant, they are inundatedandthenexposed.Theecological in large areas oflandfl This drop canamounttoseveralmetres, andcanresult room forincomingfl resulting from theopeningofsluice-gatestomake from impoundmentistheannualdrop inlevel(draw-down) Finally, apeculiarityoftheartifi (e.g., Ofoezie2002;OgbeideandUyigue2004). proportions, withupto80%ofthecommunityinfected sh populationsinthelowerNile(AswanDam,Egypt) cation caused byshortageofrainfalland the owing intodownstream areas andincreases et al ood watersduringtherainyseason. . 1988).Theresponse tosuchactions uctuating betweenperiodswhere cial tropical lakesresulting ow reduces theamount et al. 2008. s population, sh CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 21 ow in oating aquatic plants, . 1993). Increasingly, sedimentation . 1993). Increasingly, sh species, fl et al ne sediments from one river to another, one river to another, ne sediments from shes; and © JOHANNES FÖRSTER Changes in the physical and chemical status of the Changes in the physical and chemical status the transfer of clear water such as through river water, which is likely to increase to a normally muddy river, algal growth; of fi Introduction leading to a loss of habitats, such as gravel spawning beds for fi fi of alien The spread and animal diseases and their vectors. the recipient river, with major implications for channel river, the recipient to a integrity and ecological functioning leading loss of biodiversity; frequent Flow reduction in the donor river and increased fl in the donor river and increased Flow reduction Deforestation and sedimentation and Deforestation rapidly population has grown Since the 1950s, Africa’s 2.5% for the rate of around with an average growth period 1950-2005 (UN 2010). This demographic pressure such as around has accelerated rates of deforestation, of eastern Lakes the Great Africa. The case of Lake sedimentation increased is well known, where Tanganyika in changed species has resulted following deforestation composition and disruption of community interactions in (Cohen some areas from watershed deforestation, road building and other building and road deforestation, watershed from the head of the River Chari, a tributary of Lake Chad’. The the head of the River Chari, a tributary of and bids for the feasibility studies have been completed, opened in 2008. were project with water Generally speaking, the risks associated transfers can be summarized as follows: ● ● ● ● ow at shermen nally in 2008 . 2008) (Figure . 2008) (Figure et al . 2008). With more than . 2008). With more et al . 2008). The ‘Transaqua’ project envisions the project . 2008). The ‘Transaqua’ et al cient supplies. The obvious solution from a manager cient supplies. The obvious solution from construction of a ’broad navigable canal which, running construction of a ’broad along the eastern and northern of the Congo crest the waters of the extreme catchment, could intercept north eastern edges of the basin and, after a course of the Congo-Chad watershed about 2,400km would reach fl its entire in Central African territory and discharge particular for rice production (Musa particular for rice production Lake Chad around all wetlands in the region 1.5). Virtually up, and the of drying either dried up or on the verge are has been planned irrigation development of 213,400ha stopped at 33,824ha (Musa farmers, fi 20 million people, most of whom are dependent upon the lake and its and livestock breeders wetlands for their subsistence and livelihoods, surrounding being tabled is so serious that plans are the problem Water other rivers in the region. to transfer water from additional present here, transfers, such as proposed to species diversity (see to threats in relation problems transfers’, below). section ‘Water transfers Water Africa has left The uneven distribution of rainfall across have while others in water resources rich some regions insuffi water-rich point of view is to transfer water from or user’s water is limited. At present, catchments to those where In limited to southernhowever, Africa; this action is largely to divert the Ubangi River the 1960s, a plan was proposed the drying and dying Lake Chad. into the Chari to revitalize proposed water transfer schemes were Such inter-basin periods in the 1980s, 1990s and fi at different (Musa Deforestation of the Upper Guinean rainforest in western Ghana. Population growth across many parts of Africa has led to increased of deforestation levels and increased sediment loads in catchments. 22 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND the eutrophication ofLakeVictoria (e.g.,Witte reviewed byNyenje of eutrophication across inlandsub-SaharanAfricaare issue September/October2008),andmanyexamples eutrophic (Water Research Commission,SouthAfrica; it isestimatedthat28%ofalllakesandreservoirs are quantities normallyrequired bytheecosystem.InAfrica, phosphorus) are released intofreshwaters inexcessof Eutrophication occurswhennutrients(mainlynitrogen and Eutrophication impacting Africa’s inlandwatersare discussedbelow. apparent (Dejoux1988).Themajorformsofwaterpollution and theirimpactonfreshwater communitiesisclearly types ofpollutionare rapidlyincreasing onthecontinent carried outinAfrica,despitethefactthatsources ofall Few detailedstudiesofwaterpollutionimpactshavebeen 1.2.2.2 Pollution particularly thoseofrock-dwelling communities. anthropogenic activitiesisimpactinglacustrinehabitats, many surfacewaters. a majorsource ofnutrients,leadingtoeutrophication of untreated intheenvironment, are increasingly becoming industries inurbanareas, whichare oftendischarged in sub-SaharanAfrica,wastewatersfrom sewageand and urbanareas. Indevelopingcountries,suchasthose nutrients causingeutrophication originatefrom agricultural (see Box1.1IsNileperch ascapegoat?).Mostofthe on LakeVictoria, Kampala,Uganda. Nile perchfi sh headsbeingsmokedatafi et al . (2010).Awellknownexampleis ©SARAHEMCC sh landingsite et al . 2008) aquatic environments where theNileperch cohabits Such aphenomenon wasnotobservedinthose other Sahelo-Sudan area, start toproliferate inLakeVictoria? Why didtheNileperch, whichoccursalloverthe ecosystem (Balirwa but alsomajorenvironmental changestothewholelake involving notonlytheimpactsofspeciesintroductions however, shownthatthereality ismore complex, as the‘Frankensteineffect‘. More recent studieshave, this newspecies.Suchaphenomenonisreferred to deal withthehighlyintensivepredation pressure from because theindigenousfi Nile perch wastoblameforthis‘ecologicalcatastrophe’, 1992). Theconclusionappeared obvious:theintroduced of endemiccichlidspeciesstrongly receded (Witte beginning ofthe1980s.Atsametime,populations into thelakein1960s,startedtoproliferate atthe of analienspecies.Thislarge predatory fi consequences onindigenousfaunaoftheintroduction Victoria isusuallyquotedasanexampleofthedisastrous The introduction ofNileperch ( Box 1.1IsNileperch ascapegoat? with afew, suchas mercury, showntoaccumulateup Heavy metalsare takenupbybothplantsandanimals, Heavy metals (see box1.1IsNileperch ascapegoat?). area ofLakeTanganyika andaround muchofLakeVictoria pollution are, forexample,wellknownintheBujumbura sub-Saharan Africa(Nyenje of wastewateristreated insewagetreatment plantsin anoxia.Lessthan30% demanding andcauses,inturn, cause primaryorganic pollution,whichishighlyoxygen- use. Sewageandothereffl a steepincrease inurban,industrialandagricultural land Population growth overthelastfewdecadeshasled to Domestic andindustrialorganicloads sulphide. generating harmfulgases,suchasmethaneandhydrogen of macrophytes, decompose,consumingoxygen and may result asdeadorganic matter, suchasthedie-off and animals.Inextreme cases,atotaldepletionofoxygen harmful secondarymetabolitesthatare toxictohumans organisms withintheaquaticcommunity, andmayproduce cyanobacteria candisruptvirtuallyallinteractionsbetween following deoxygenationofthewatercolumn.Blooms and ultimatelytheeradicationofspeciessuchasfi with cyanobacteria,large-scale bloomsofmacrophytes, increases inphytoplankton,replacement ofdiatoms The environmental effects ofeutrophication include et al . 2003). sh faunawasnotprepared to uents, richinorganic material, et al Lates niloticus . 2009).Suchformsof sh, introduced sh, ) toLake et al sh, . CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 23 and sh fauna . 1995). In Lake cant impact on sh communities et al cant environmental environmental cant shes would probably shes would probably Stolothrissa tanganicae shery has been for pelagic sh community based on a predator sh community based on a predator was populations invertebrates sh and sheries shing in African lakes are reviewed by reviewed shing in African lakes are cant impact on the endemic fi cant impact The overall effect was summarised as a The overall effect in the local selective decline of large cant role y was found to have a signifi y was found to have species and an increase in clupeids (Coulter species and an increase Lates shing is often recognised as an important form of shing is often recognised of more than twenty years, and concluded that the effect that the effect and concluded twenty years, than of more on fi larvicides of the study in the Okavango 1997). In another low (Lévêque of deltamethrin for control the insecticide Delta, spraying fl the Tsetse non-target aquatic invertebrates, although subsequent although subsequent invertebrates, aquatic non-target for of likely recovery has found indications monitoring 2004). and Ramberg most species (Perkins 1.2.2.3 Impact of fi The impacts of fi in Pitcher and Hart (1995). a number of contributions Overfi of few documented examples are perturbation, but there following overexploitation. species completely disappearing in lake fi Impacts on species composition Craig commonly documented (e.g., more however, are, to have reported 1992). For example, demersal trawling is played a signifi and Ligtvoet (Goudswaard cichlid species in Lake Victoria 1988) (see below) and Malawi (Tweddle the main fi where Tanganyika, steady reduction species, the initial impact was a reported in all to a single community was reduced the 1991). Ultimately, pairing between predator-prey Lates stappersi. a stable fi change from system to an unstable community structured and prey with the visual sexual recognition system of many with the visual sexual recognition likely loss of cichlids, leading to hybridisation and anoxia limits genetic diversity (Spinney 2010). Water cichlids build where grounds the potential reproduction deep some species to move from nests, and has forced from the risk of predation water into the shallows where increased. is the Nile perch would in Lake Victoria of Nile perch The proliferation change in a deep and progressive from thus result to pollution. the ecological status of the lake, related of of the ecosystem led to the increase Transformation an abundant food by providing communities predator the shrimp biomass exploded as a (for example, source plankton populations). Even without of increased result indigenous Nile perch, predatory of the introduction endemic populations of cichlid fi of the signifi have declined as a result has most changes within the lake. Although the Nile perch likely had a signifi of the lake, the situation is not as clear cut as originally thought. This case study demonstrates why we need to be cautious when developing our conclusions about the species on native biodiversity. of introduced effects cant cant et al. shed shed cant impact ies over a period sh fauna was overfi species occupy similar niches . 1992). sh (Amaize 2010). Considering sh (Amaize cation plants has resulted in an cation plants has resulted sh, environmental contamination, et al shing settlement where over 2,000 over where shing settlement Lates sh species without any signifi on their populations. For example, the same ecological ecological on their populations. For example, the same where imbalance was not observed in Lake Tanganyika, four autochtonous to the Nile perch. a number of major changes undergone has Lake Victoria since the beginning of the 20th century (Balirwa with other fi the indigenous fi 2003). Firstly, was a high there (see Section 1.2.1.3). Secondly, human population in the lake basin, in the local increase established. cotton and tea plantations were large where Development of the lake basin in this manner has led a number of pollutants, including in to increases fertilisers and insecticides as used in the plantations, of domestic and urban pollutants. loading and increased A lack of water purifi the lake, leading accumulation of pollutions throughout The main consequences of eutrophication. to widespread in water transparency, a reduction include eutrophication (lack of oxygen) in deeper water. anoxia and increased These two phenomena have had particularly signifi impacts on the endemic cichlid fauna. Increased water water impacts on the endemic cichlid fauna. Increased has interfered especially near the lake shore turbidity, sh ponds in Delta State (Nigeria), affecting an estimated (Nigeria), affecting sh ponds in Delta State families from different parts of the country make a living, different families from the cost is undoubtedly high. Pesticides of contamination in African lakes An important source use of pesticides to curb and rivers is the increasing for agricultural diseases of people and livestock, and of pesticides on the impact purposes. In Africa, however, communities is the functioning of aquatic ecosystems and in westernstill poorly documented. One long-term study of a weekly looked at the impact Africa has, however, application of insecticide against blackfl and damage to the fi and damage to the Oil pollution of oil, mainly in estuaries and lagoons, discharges Chronic to aquatic systems. An a major threat considered are demonstrating the serious impacts unfortunate example in July in inland waters was reported oil pollution can have about 6,000 may have destroyed 2010, when an oil spillage fi of fi USD100 million worth fi the massive loss of the food chain. Mercury discharge in freshwater systems systems in freshwater discharge Mercury chain. the food problem a particular mining, to gold linked is generally the in Africa, River system. Nevertheless, in the Congo low metals is still relatively of trace or heavy occurrence such as parts of the world, to some other when compared (Biney South America 24 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND Lake Victoria FisheriesOrganization. Figure 1.6.Evolutionoffi Only a few specieshave beendeliberately introduced al to beamajorthreat tofreshwater biodiversity(Dudgeon The spread ofalieninvasive plantsandanimalsisrecognised 1.2.2.4 Invasivealienspecies longer term(Witte new fi catch compositionposethequestionofhowstable tonnes by2007.However, suchdramaticchanges in niloticus Oreochromis newly introduced species(particularly species declined,newfi (Fryer andIles1972)(Figure 1.6).Inthiscase,asthenative 1970s, wellbefore theNileperch wasestablished inthelake of theendemictilapiaspeciesbybeginning increased fi (nylon gillnetsandoutboard motors),combinedwith In thecaseofLakeVictoria, improved fi impacts ofnaturalenvironmental change. structure are apparent butare hard toseparatefrom the 1991). Insummary, theimpactsoffi through abalanceofcompetitiveinteractions(Coulter . 2005;Leprieur shery, basedonnon-native species, willbeoverthe shing effort, resulted inasevere drop incatches et al et al ). Thetotalcatchreached 0.9million . 2009;Samways andTaylor 2004). . 2007). sheries were established,targeting sh catchesinLakeVictoria (Kenya,Uganda,Tanzania). Source: FishStatPlus,FAO and shing oncommunity Lates niloticus shing technology shing and et et threat. Smallmouth bass( alien fi Cape province. InSouthAfrica(see Darwall Africa, where bassand trout were introduced intheWestern alien speciestoimprove sportfi 1995). Inthepast,however, fi newly created water-bodies suchasLakeKariba (Marshall replenish overexploited wildstocksortoboostfi The maingoalofdeliberateintroductions hasoftenbeento sustainable fi tilapias and bodies. Forinstance,innewlybuiltreservoirs, stockingby group forimproving fi the introduction oftilapiaspeciesasanimportant of theargument, thoseinvolvedinaquaculture encourage fi are reported tohavenegativeimpactson theindigenous fi niloticus body toanother. Forexample,Niletilapia, been speciestranslocationswithinAfricafrom onewater- Madagascar (Benstead into Africanfreshwaters untilnow, withtheexceptionof sh fauna(Canonico sheries throughout mostofinter-tropical Africa,where they shes introduced foranglingare aparticularly serious , hasbeenintroduced bothforaquaculture and Heterotis niloticus sheries (Moreau sheries et al sh production inmanyAfricanwater et al . 2005).However, ontheotherside Micropterus dolomieu . 2000).More often,there have shery offi et al has enabled development of hasenableddevelopmentof sheries, suchasinSouth . 1988). cers alsointroduced Oreochromis Oreochromis et al ), together sheriesin . 2009), CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 25 © IUCN/DANIÈLE PERROT MAÎTRE nancing for better farming have only just begun to be considered (see www. have only just begun to be considered The impacts of climate change freshwaterbiodiversity.eu). detail in Chapter 8, Section 8.6.1 in more treated are Revolution and wetlands 1.2.3 The African Green of millions of African farmers, with hundreds of millions Tens living in subsistence conditions. Until of dependents, are to Africa’s donors sent only food aid in response recently, proposing deepening agricultural crisis. Now they are through agricultural production a new plan: increased Revolution. It will require Green African a homegrown four kinds of assistance: fi inputs; extension services to advise farmers on the new technologies; community nurseries to diversify production; laid out As previously and investments in infrastructure. for 2025 (UN-Water/Africa Vision in the Africa Water scale of 2003), this will translate into an unprecedented ), M. ), all and sh fauna . 2005), but Oncorhynchus et al Tilapia sparmanii Tilapia , have had major M. salmoides Lepomis macrochirus sh ( sh Salmo trutta sh often surviving in refuges of less than in refuges sh often surviving eld fed by Tiga Dam outside Kanoon, north-east Nigeria. Increased Dam production through an African agricultural eld fed by Tiga ) and bluegill sunfi and brown trout, trout, and brown with largemouth and spotted bass ( with largemouth punctulatus and banded tilapia ( North America, from in Africa, now dominate the fi further north from throughout more than 80% of the Olifants River system, more throughout with indigenous fi Rainbow trout, 1km in headwater streams. mykiss, impacts in cooler headwater streams. in more treated The impacts of invasive alien species are detail in Chapter 8, Section 8.2.3. 1.2.2.5 Climate change human water change and increasing climate Anthropogenic on available stress to place great widely expected use are Africa (Thieme across water resources biodiversity changes on freshwater of these the effects Irrigated tomato fi Such efforts will be greatlyby the aided Green will lead to unprecedented Revolution water sector. development within the provision of information on the distribution, ecology and conservation needs of freshwater species. 26 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND wetlands are ofmajorimportanceinagriculturalsystems; management systems.Forexample,manyvalleybottom they are inextricablylinkedtocropping andlivestock ecosystem services,includingfood.Inmanyplaces people inAfricathrough theprovision ofnumerous role insustainingthelivelihoodsofmanymillions aesthetic qualities.Theseecosystemsplayanimportant immense biodiversityandhaveimportantrecreational and environmental quality, sustainlivelihoods,support Assessment 2005;UNEP2010).Wetlands maintain are valuableecosystems(MillenniumEcosystem It isbecomingincreasingly acceptedthatinlandwetlands 1.3 10, Section10.1. Africa’s watersectorare covered inmore detailinChapter waters, asprovided bythisstudy. Developmentplansfor needs offreshwater speciesthroughout Africansinland information onthedistribution,ecologyandconservation will begreatly aidedbyprovision ofreliable andaccessible ecosystems andtomitigatepotentialdamage.Suchefforts therefore, bemadetosafeguard theservicesoffreshwater development withinitswatersector. Everyeffort must, provided by wetlands, directly supportinglocal livelihoods. provided bywetlands,directly Boys holdingafi ecosystems inAfrica Functions andvaluesoffreshwater sh catch (Mormyrops spp.) in Bomane, Lower Aruwimi, D. R. Congo. Fish caught for food are a vital service avitalservice spp.)inBomane, LowerAruwimi,D.R.Congo. Fish caughtforfoodare sh catch(Mormyrops © KLAAS-DOUWE DJIKSTRA that makesthemvaluableinsocio-economicaswell range ofnaturalresources thatoccurwithinwetlands a large diversityoflife(Silverton and amultiplicityofhabitatsthatenablethemtosupport in theworld,characterizedbyhighprimaryproductivity Wetlands are amongstthemostproductive ecosystems 1.3.1 Wetland functions chemical components,andtheirsurrounding catchment. on theinteractionsbetweentheirphysical,biologicaland hence provide different ecosystemservices,depending people. Different wetlandsperformdifferent functionsand which bringbothphysicalandnon-physicalbenefi through theprovision ofarange‘ecosystemservices’, directly supportingandsustaininglivelihoods.Theydo this society. InAfrica,wetlandsplayaparticularlyvitalrole in of theecologicalfunctionstheyperformwithhuman The valueofwetlandsforpeoplearisesfrom theinteraction season andduringdroughts. a source ofarablelandorgrazingthroughout thedry key resource forcultivatorsandpastoralists,byproviding extended periods.Asaresult, thesewetlandsact as a into thedryseason,allowingcultivationofcrops for saturated duringthewetseason,ground retains water et al. 1999).Itisthewide t to ts CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 27 © KEVIN SMITH lled with sand mined from the river bed by hand, loaded loaded bed by hand, the river mined from lled with sand on to the bank, and then transported in trucks to be used in in trucks to be used and then transported on to the bank, construction. Sand mining in the Sanaga River, Cameroon. The boats are The boats Cameroon. River, Sanaga mining in the Sand fi 28 CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND the concentration ofpollutants isreduced before the wetland, thepapyrus vegetationabsorbsnutrients, and Kampala. During thepassageofeffl effl the Nakivubopapyrusswamp receives semi-treated forms andremove nutrients from thewater. InUganda, and volatilisation)mayconvert heavymetalstoinsoluble (including nitrifi and biologicalprocesses thattakeplacewithinwetlands improving waterquality. Thelarge numberofchemical Some wetlandsplayanimportantrole inmaintainingor wetland functionsispresented inTable 1. some ofthephysicalbenefi and, hence,theconditionofwetland.Asummary and isdirectly related tothespecifi way inwhichtheydosoiscomplexandmultifunctional, and intangiblebenefi Wetlands inthiswayprovide awidevarietyoftangible purifi dry seasonriverfl of benefi recognized bycommunities,butincludeawidediversity use. Otherecosystemservicesare oftennotexplicitly materials; andwildplantsforfoodmedicinal fi ‘provisioning services’,suchas:domesticwatersupply; The physicalbenefi spatial scales(Lawton1999). evapotranspiration) across arangeoftemporaland (for example,nutrientcycling,condensationand an importantrole inmaintainingwetlandprocesses it isnowrecognized thatbiodiversity and thewetland’s locationwithinacatchment.However, specifi unique toanyparticularwetlandanddependentonsite- an ecosystem.Theexactnature ofthefunctionsis and abiotic(i.e.,soilwater)componentsthatcomprise through theinteractionofbiotic(i.e.,fl chemical andbiologicalprocesses thatoccur Ecological functionsare theresult ofthephysical, disadvantages. that overalltheadvantagesofwetlandsoutweighany do enhancehumanwellbeing,anditiswidelyaccepted al. reduce theprevalence ofinfectiousdiseases(Chipps ecosystems andassociatedbiodiversitywillgenerally are disturbed,whereas thepreservation ofintact carrying speciesmostoftenincrease whenwetlands It shouldbenoted,however, thatpopulationsofdisease one reason whysomanywetlandshavebeendrained. as mosquitoesandsomespeciesofmollusc–thisis to people,theydoalsoharbourdiseasevectorssuch 2005). Althoughwetlandsare generallyofgreat benefi ecological terms(MillenniumEcosystemAssessment sheries; livestockgrazing;cultivation;construction 2006;Keesing uent from thesewageworksof capitalcity cation, climateregulation andsedimentretention. c factors,includingclimate,geology, topography ts suchasfl cto, denitrifi cation, et al. ows, groundwater recharge, water ts derivedfrom wetlandsinclude ts tolarge numbersofpeople.The ood reduction, maintenanceof 2010).Manywetlandfunctions ts humansocietiesgainfrom cto, ammonifi cation, c ecologicalfunctions uent through the ora andfauna) per se , plays cation et t them a large numberdependonwetlandhabitatstosupport bird thatmigratebetweenEurope andAfricaeachyear, important formigratorybirds. Ofthe300speciesof stages oftheirlife-cycle.Wetlands are especially drought orfoodscarcity existelsewhere oratparticular them asrefuges, migratingtothemwhenconditionsof swamp tortoiseandlechweantelope),whilstothersuse animals livepermanentlyinwetlands(forexample,the Wetlands supportarichdiversityoffl also generatingincomeforlocalpeople. attractions, notonlyenrichingthelivesofvisitors,but as theOkavangoDeltainBotswanaare majortourist cohesiveness ofcommunities.Elsewhere, wetlands such Such ceremonies are importantinenhancingthesocial high waterandbackagainwhenthelevelsfall. the peoplemoveoutoffl year, importantculturalceremonies are conductedwhen hydrological dynamicsoftheBarotse fl Zambia hasdevelopedasaconsequenceofthe example, theculture oftheLozipeopleinwestern cognitive developmentandaestheticexperience.For functions. Theseare associatedwithspiritualenrichment, People alsogain the city(KansiimeandNalubega1999). water entersLakeVictoria, theprincipalwatersource for very often gounrecognised and are oftenunder-valued. accruing outside monetarysystems.Consequently, they Many ecosystem servicesare forms of‘publicgood’, depend. the conditionofnaturalenvironment onwhichthey this makesthemparticularly vulnerable tochangesin livelihood options,and often havelimitedalternative employment andculturalintegrity. Suchcommunities through provision offoodsupplies,medicines, income, critical contributionstotheirlivelihoodsandwelfare directly dependentonwetlandfunctionsthatprovide gained from them.InAfrica,manymillionsofpeopleare on socialperceptions oftheuseandbenefi The valuesattributedtowetlandsare largely dependent 1.3.2 Wetland values development andresource planningandmanagement. functions haveinthepastoftengoneunrecognised in people beingaware ofthem.Asaconsequence,wetland wetland contributionstohumanwelfare accruewithout far beyondtheboundariesofwetlanditself.Many wetlands andveryoftenthebenefi Many groups ofpeoplebenefi million birds eachyear(Roggeri1995). that theInnerDeltaofNigerhostsupto1.5 Africa eachsupportover400species,anditisestimated en route . TheOkavangoDeltaandKafueFlatsin non-physical oodplain duringperiodsof t from thepresence of benefi ora andfauna.Some ts are experienced ts from wetland odli. Each oodplain. ts tobe CHAPTER 1 | BACKGROUND 29 4HE NG LDS OF EITY ND FOR NLAND E OF AN ISTURE ION S AND AREA THE EVER AND P AROUND MORE $ELTA LANDS WAS et al. . et al. et al et al (Zwarts -1 et al. t human populations. 4HE TOTAL CATCH FROM INLAND WATERS IE LAKES RIVERS AND WET MILLION TONNES IN &!/ 4HIS COMPARES TO MILL sheries and 48.4 million tonnes from fi marine capture tonnes from many people cannot afford in Africa, where However, aquaculture. sheries (2 the contribution of inland wild fi to practice aquaculture, than that of greater million tonnes) to the livelihoods of people is much CULTURED l SHERIES TONNES 5.%0 #ATCHES FROM I subsistence in particular those from very often unreported, sheries are fi important to the rural poor in particular. of great sheries, which are fi 4HE (ADEJIA .GURU WETLANDS IN .IGERIA CONTRIBUTE TO THE RECHARG that live 1 million people aquifer used for water supply by approximately (Hollis in the region "ASED ON THE INCLUSIVE 2AMSAR DEl NITION OF WETLANDS OVER HALF world’s population (i.e., more than 3 billion people) obtain their basic people) obtain their basic than 3 billion (i.e., more population world’s billion 3 wetlands. The remaining freshwater inland from water needs via cases is recharged which in some on groundwater, people depend wetlands. )N THE +ILOMBERO m OODPLAIN WETLAND IN 4ANZANIA OF @POOR HOUSEHOLDS AND OF @BETTER OFF HOUSEHOLDS RELY ON THE WETLA DRINKING WATER -C#ARTNEY AND VAN +OPPEN )N WESTERN !FRICA THE SHALLOW GROUNDWATER AND ELEVATED SOIL MO used valley wetlands are of inland of about 5 million hectares cultivation. extensively in crop .ON IRRIGATED RICE GROWN ON THE m OODPLAINS OF THE )NNER .IGER m UCTUATES BETWEEN AND TONNES PER YEAR WITH YIE THE ORDER OF &ORMAT +G HA DIVERSITY OF ORGANISMS INCLUDING OVER SPECIES OF PLANTS THAN SPECIES OF BIRDS AND SPECIES OF l SH (OWARD +AFUE AND ,UENA &LATS WETLANDS IN :AMBIA SUPPORT AN OUTSTANDI 7ETLANDS ARE IMPORTANT IN THE BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING OF CARBON DIOXIDE METHANE AND HYDROGEN SULPHIDE +AYRNALI 'LOBALLY WETLAND PEAT DEPOSITS OCCUPY JUST OF THE WORLDS L BUT STORE OF THE PLANETS SOIL CARBON POOL ,LOYD IN PRE ,OCAL PEOPLE USE THE FRUITS SEEDS TUBERS ROOTS AND LEAVES OF 3EWAGE FROM OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF +AMPALA AROUND PEOPLE IS DISCHARGED INTO THE KM§ .AKIVUBO WETLAND the quality of water cantly improves of the wetland signifi presence main supply the city’s 3km from entering Lake Victoria, approximately INTAKE +ANSIIME AND .ALUBEGA PLANTS FROM THE WETLANDS SURROUNDING ,AKE #HILWA IN -ALAWI )NTERNATIONAL 7ATER -ANAGEMENT )NSTITUTE 4HE WETLANDS OF THE +AFUE m OODPLAIN IN :AMBIA SUPPORT l SHERIE AVERAGING TONNES PER YEAR -C#ARTNEY ,OCAL PEOPLE COLLECT EIGHT PLANT SPECIES FROM THE "UMBWISIDI FRESHWATER WETLAND IN 4ANZANIA TO TREAT AILMENTS RANGING FROM F to chest pains and coughs (Rebelo stomach disorders 'LOBALLY WETLANDS ARE HIGHLY PRODUCTIVE AND BECAUSE HETEROGEN in a wide variety of ecological and soil conditions results in hydrology niches, they support immense biodiversity (Junk s s s s s s s s s s s 7ATER SUPPLY s 7ATER SUPPLY !GRICULTURE &ISHERIES 'AS REGULATION s 7ASTE WATER TREATMENT s &OOD