Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: a Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: a Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2000 Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: A Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities of Beaufort and Port Royal, South Carolina Kristopher Balding King University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons King, Kristopher Balding, "Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: A Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities of Beaufort and Port Royal, South Carolina" (2000). Theses (Historic Preservation). 407. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/407 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: King, Kristopher Balding (2000). Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: A Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities of Beaufort and Port Royal, South Carolina. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/407 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: A Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities of Beaufort and Port Royal, South Carolina Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: King, Kristopher Balding (2000). Historic Districts & Traditional Neighborhood Design: A Comparison of Mechanisms in the Neighboring Residential Communities of Beaufort and Port Royal, South Carolina. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/407 UNIVERSITry PENNSYLVANIA UBRARIES HISTORIC DISTRICTS & TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN: A COMPARISON OF MECHANISMS IN THE NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES OF BEAUFORT AND PORT ROYAL, SOUTH CAROLINA Kristopher Balding King A THESIS In Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 2000 Supervisor ( \ ^ Reader David A. Hollenberg Nellie Longsworth Associate Regional Director Historic Preservation Consultant Northeast Region, National Park Service Lecturer in Historic Preservation Lecturer in Historic Preservation fU-<^leyO }radua\^ Group Chair latero fe Professor of Architecture U.X'iVE^SiTY PEmsroumA Acknowledgements I owe many thanks to great number of people who helped, encouraged, and listened throughout the last year as this thesis took shape. This thesis would not have been possible without their generous help. I would like to thank Victor Dover, Donna Alley, Jefferson Mansell, Gregory Huddy, John Perry, Billy Keyserling, David De Long, Withold Rybczynski, and Kathleen Curran for taking the time to speak, and/or meet with me to discuss my topic, and share information. I would like to thank my advisor. David Hollenberg, and my reader, Nellie Longsworth. Their probing questions and constructive criticism have helped me to improve my writing and think more clearly. This thesis would not have been possible without their help and support. Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii List of Figures v Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Setting the Scene 9 History of Beaufort County 9 Growtii and Development: 1960-2000 26 Chapter 3. Beaufort: Historic Districts and Design Review 29 Preservation in The City of Beaufort Since 1968 29 Preservation in Beaufort: The Early Steps 31 The 1 970 Inventory of Historic Buildings and Sites 37 1972: New Zoning & A Preservation Plan for Historic Beaufort 41 1 979: The Beaufort Preservation Manual 51 The 1989 Update to the Preservation Plan 56 1990: The Beaufort Preservation Manual Supplement 63 Northwest Quadrant Design Principles 70 City Of Beaufort Comprehensive Land Use Plan 72 Analysis of Design Review in Beaufort 75 Chapter 4. Port Royal: New Urbanism and Design Review 83 Reactions to Modem Zoning and Town Planning Techniques 86 New Urbanism: Theory and Code 89 New Urbanism in Port Royal: Dover Kohl and Partner's Master Plan 98 The Town of Port Royal Traditional Town Overlay District 109 Port Royal 1995-2000 122 Analysis of Design Review in Port Royal 1 24 Chapter 4. Conclusion 1 29 Appendices 136 A. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation 136 B. Excerpts from the Beaufort Preservation Manual 138 C. Excerpts form the Dover Kohl and Partners Master Plan 145 D. Excerpts from the Port Royal Traditional Town Overlay District Code 151 Bibliography 158 Index 162 IV List of Illustrations Fig. 1 Detail of Beaufort '^ District 19 Fig. 2 Detail of 1797 Survey illustrating the Beaufort 21 Fig. 3 Example of "Beaufort Style" 21 Fig. 4 Example of "Beaufort Style" 32 Fig. 5 Typical Residential Street in Historic Beaufort unsympathetic design 32 Fig. 6 New construction in Historic Beaufort displays Foundation 34 Fig. 7 Preliminary Survey area for Historic Beaufort ^2 Fig. 8 Map Of City-Enforced District 65 Fig. 9 Illustrating effect of incompatible height 67 Fig. 10 Map Illustrating Historic Beaufort Boundaries 74 Fig. 11 Map of Beaufort's Historic Resources ^3 Fig. 12 Port Royal historic house ' ^^^ Fig. 13 Port Royal historic house 104 Fig 14 Port Royal newly rehabilitated historic house '04 Fig 1 5 Port Royal historic house 110 Fig 16 Port Royal Overlay District Boundaries 1 ^ Fig. 1 7 New Port Royal Firestation 1 120 Fig, 18 New houses in Port Royal 1 20 Fig. 19 New house in Port Royal 1-1 Fig. 20 New house in Port Royal Chapter 1. Introduction Historic Beaufort County. South Carolina is experiencing growth at an consists of the coast alarming rate. In fact the entire South Carolina lowcountry, which of growth in the and adjacent lowland areas, is experienced an unprecedented amount as commercial sprawl. form of resorts, retirement and golf course communities as well Georgia. Beaufort Situated directly between Charleston, South Carolina and Savannah, development pressure. A significant County is accustomed to just this type of tourist and the quality of the increase in these pressures over the last ten years has come to threaten soaring, and a regional landscape. With a very strong economy, home construction rates City of renewed residential interest in this area, many of the islands surrounding the Beaufort have been developed into gated golf course communities or retail/commercial historic landscape that strips. This development has come at a great expense to the defines this region. grass marshes and once It is the small town chann and the historic oak trees, sea seemingly endless inland waterways that are being destroyed. One of the oldest colonized regions in North America, Beaufort County's cultural, historical, and and English archaeological resources are immense: it boasts Spanish, French, Scottish, colonization as well as a confluence of the Southeast's most well developed and organized Native American Chiefdoms. The staggering amount of development historic throughout the county and its negative effects threaten these resources, the landscape, and the delicate coastal environment. Beaufort County, like many other historic regions, is experiencing growth at rate is becoming that is detrimental and the need for more extensive growth management evident. Traditional historic preservation techniques have been focused within the City of Beaufort itself and, as such, have been limited to areas with a concentration of historicity and a knowledgeable, active citizenship. While the City of Beaufort has successfully implemented of a series of refined preservation plans, the rest of the county has not been as fortunate. The result is that the historic balance and physical structure of Beaufort County is becoming less and less understandable as the pressures of development drastically alter the landscape. As the pressure for development continues to expand, the smaller less protected towns within Beaufort County are beginning to react. Many have enacted protective measures and comprehensive planning but, unfortunately, most of these reactive measures have come at an already great expense of the historic fabric and defining features of these small communities. Any sort of existing comprehensive planning efforts could have prevented the erosion of the historic towns. Currently Beaufort County is seeing the application of preservation planning and Neotraditional. or New Urbanist planning, as well as areas with no planning at all. The City of Beaufort is a veteran at balancing growth and preservation interests. It possesses many advantages, being the largest and wealthiest city within the county with a well organized and active preservation community. The City of Beaufort also actively supports the preservation of historic resources. The city has invested much in understanding the value of its resources, and creating preservation plans to guide their management. The City has also quickly and scrupulously responded to the various preservations plans created for Historic Beaufort. Beaufort has learned from experience. its share of success as spending nearly 30 years developing its current system. It has seen updating its plan. well
Recommended publications
  • Building Order on Beacon Hill, 1790-1850
    BUILDING ORDER ON BEACON HILL, 1790-1850 by Jeffrey Eugene Klee A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Art History Spring 2016 © 2016 Jeffrey Eugene Klee All Rights Reserved ProQuest Number: 10157856 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10157856 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 BUILDING ORDER ON BEACON HILL, 1790-1850 by Jeffrey Eugene Klee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Lawrence Nees, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Art History Approved: __________________________________________________________ George H. Watson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Ann L. Ardis, Ph.D. Senior Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Bernard L. Herman, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for Resilience Introduction
    HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CITY OF BEAUFORT: FOR RESILIENCE Marine Extension and Georgia Sea Grant | Carl Vinson Institute of Government Danielle Goshen, J.D. Candidate, 2019, University of Georgia School of Law & Georgia Sea Grant Law Fellow SPRING 2019 ABOUT THE AUTHORS DANIELLE GOSHEN, J.D. Candidate, will be graduating from the University of Georgia School of Law in 2019. During her time at Georgia Law she has served as a Georgia Sea Grant Legal Fellow. In addition, Danielle is an Editorial Board Member for the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and served as the President of the Environmental Law Association. Last summer Danielle interned at the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 4 office in Atlanta. Special thanks goes to Rebecca Neubauer, Law Student, University of North Carolina School of Law & North Carolina Sea Grant and Heather Payne, Associate Professor at Seton Hall School of Law who provided background on national historic preservation laws in their paper: “Historical Preser- vation Laws and Long-Term Climate Change Adaptation: Challenges and Opportunities.” Additional thanks goes to Shana Jones, J.D., Director of the Georgia Sea Grant Law Program, for providing essential editing support as well as overall direction for the project and Sarah Watson, Coastal Climate and Resilience Specialist, S.C. Sea Grant Consortium and Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments, and Professor Kirstin Dow, Carolina Trustees Professor in the Department of Geography at the University of South Carolina, for providing important feedback on this project. Cover Photo: Julia Engel, Gal Meets Glam PROJECT BACKGROUND his white paper is one outcome of a four-state regional project funded by the National Oceanic TAtmospheric Administration Office of Coastal Management, Florida Sea Grant, Georgia Sea Grant, South Carolina Sea Grant, and North Carolina Sea Grant (Project No.: FY2014-2018: NA14OAR4170084).
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation in the City of Beaufort, South Carolina: Considerations for Resilience
    SEA GRANT LAW & POLICY JOURNAL VOL. 10:1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE CITY OF BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA: CONSIDERATIONS FOR RESILIENCE 1 Danielle Goshen I. INTRODUCTION: BEAUFORT, A HISTORIC “BEST SMALL TOWN” AT RISK The city of Beaufort, South Carolina is located on Port Royal Island, and is the state’s second oldest city. In 1711, the British founded Beaufort and the city was established as a shipbuilding center, before it became an agricultural hub during the antebellum period. During the Civil War, Beaufort was quickly occupied by the Union forces, and became an important terminus for previously enslaved people as they escaped plantations of the Confederacy.While the city has an estimated population of over 13,000,2 around 192,500 tourists visit Beaufort each year to soak in its rich history and enjoy the charming seaside scenery.3 In 1 Danielle Goshen, J.D., graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law in 2019. During her time at Georgia Law she has served as a Georgia Sea Grant Legal Fellow, an Editorial Board Member for the Journal of Intellectual Property Law, and as the President of the Environmental Law Association. Danielle also interned at the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 4 office in Atlanta in the summer of 2018. This paper is one outcome of a four-state regional project funded by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Florida Sea Grant, Georgia Sea Grant, South Carolina Sea Grant, and North Carolina Sea Grant, Project No.: FY2014-2018: NA14OAR4170084. Special thanks goes to Rebecca Neubauer,
    [Show full text]
  • Beaufort County Above Ground Historic Resources Survey Beaufort County, South Carolina
    Beaufort County Above Ground Historic Resources Survey Beaufort County, South Carolina Brockington and Associates, Inc. Brooker Architectural Design Consultants Historic Beaufort Foundation Preservation Consultants, Inc. 1998 BEAUFORT COUNTY ABOVE-GROUND HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for: Beaufort County, South Carolina City of Beaufort, South Carolina Town of Port Royal, South Carolina Brockington and Associates, Inc. Brooker Architectural Design Consultants Historic Beaufort Foundation Preservation Consultants, Inc. April 1998 Beaufort County Above-Ground Historic Resources Survey of Beaufort County, South Carolina Report Prepared for: Beaufort County, South Carolina City of Beaufort, South Carolina Town of Port Royal, South Carolina Prepared by: Bruce G. Harvey Brockington and Associates, Inc. Colin Brooker Brooker Architectural Design Consultants David B. Schneider Historic Beaufort Foundation Sarah Fick Preservation Consultants, Inc. Brockington and Associates, Inc. Brooker Architectural Design Consultants Historic Beaufort Foundation Preservation Consultants, Inc. April 1998 Acknowledgments This has been a large and complex project, and many people have provided invaluable assistance in its completion. Ian Hill, Beaufort County Historic Preservation Planner, served as the Project Manager for Beaufort County, and did a marvelous job at coordinating the various components of this survey. Lena Cofresi, Planner for the City of Beaufort, was likewise very helpful in providing insights and advice. Dan Morgan and Joe Noll, with the Beaufort County GIS program, provided invaluable assistance in producing finished maps from our field maps. In the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Mary Parramore, Andy Chandler, and Tracy Power were generous in providing information and advice. Our thanks go out to the many individuals who granted us access to their plantations and other private resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Vv.' •,. . V -• •• ^|I§^ ''' ''' •••••'.:-I:' •'••••" ''' /: ..::X ;;; I':::;^^^^ .•
    Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR sfTrE: (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE South Carolina COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PL ACES Beaufort INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FDRNPruSE^NLY ENT.Ry NUMBER ' ^X DATE (Type all entries — complete applicable sect ions) &3</£<m\*>&DJ(f ^i/lli>1 |||liiliiiiii|;::|:t;::*:i|; f ^.i*» ®%j £ jff ^*mf^ " : .;•? = * W'- .= "::f v '^ :' ' '- ;;:::;:'::':::::::;;:;::;}:X:;:::;::*:'K:;ft::::i:::;;:::::i'!:^:|:x ;i:ll^£3?:W:V; •' '•*$& '- : *•' ^ : ' • '.^:': ' "". I :; COMMON: \ ' - i '^-'^ - ' \ Historic Beaufort \ —————————————————^-jfJi ————— », . •; •••« ——. ———= ——————t ———I ——————— AND/ OR HISTORIC: vv.' •,. V -• •• ^|i§^ ''' ''' •••••'.:-i:' •'••••" ''' /: ..::x ;;; i':::;^^^^ .•,. / .^-.£....... .:*)£$> STREETANDNUMBER: '"" v / ' ' ' '' Approximately 304 acres comprising the old City of BeaufTyrtr;" bounded by CITY B'ea'oTb'rt River, south and east; Hamar and Bladen Streets, west; Boundary St., north. STATE CODE; COUNTY: CODE South Carolina 41 Beaufort 07 [|^;:CLASSiFI^¥idN """ "::' : C TATIIC ACCESSIBLE CATEGORY OWNERSHIP (Check One) STATUS TO THE PUBLIC [X] District Q Building CH Public Public Acqui sition: ffl Occupied ^ es: n Site Q Structure D Private D 1" P rocess Q Unoccupied 0 Restricted D Object S Both D Beir19 Considered Q Preservation work D Unrestricted in progress 1 — ' PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) | | Agricultural j^] Government ^) Park | | Transportation 1 1 Comments (x! Commercial jg] Industrial ^) Private Res dence Q Other (Specify) [jj] Educational
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Single Property Listings South Carolina Finding
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES SINGLE PROPERTY LISTINGS SOUTH CAROLINA Walter Scott Montgomery House, Spartanburg County, South Carolina, 84000345 FINDING AID Prepared by National Park Service Intermountain Region Museum Services Program Tucson, Arizona July 2018 National Register of Historic Places – Single Property Listings – SOUTH CAROLINA 2 National Register of Historic Places – Single Property Listings – South Carolina Scope and Content Note: The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the official list of the Nation's historic places worthy of preservation. Authorized by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect America's historic and archeological resources. - From the National Register of Historic Places site: http://www.nps.gov/nr/about.htm The Single Property listing records from South Carolina are comprised of nomination forms (signed, legal documents verifying the status of the properties as listed in the National Register) photographs, maps, correspondence, memorandums, and ephemera which document the efforts to recognize individual properties that are historically significant to their community and/or state. Arrangement: The Single Property listing records are arranged by county and therein alphabetically by property name. Within the physical files, researchers will find the records arranged in the following way: Nomination Form, Photographs, Maps, Correspondence, and then Other documentation. Extent: The NRHP Single Property Listings for South Carolina total 27 Linear Feet. Processing: The NRHP Single Property listing records for South Carolina were processed and cataloged at the Intermountain Region Museum Services Center by Karen Carver, Caitlin Godlewski, Hannah Gramson, Karl Poechlauer, and Carmen Sterk.
    [Show full text]