DOCSLIB.ORG

Inspectors Report 2 (HA0/Rha0022a

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inspectors Report 2 (HA0/Rha0022a An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report Marlborough Street Public Transport Priority Bridge. Volume 2 Part 1 Appendix 1 Copy of slides used in presenting brief of evidence to the oral hearing (attached under separate cover) Part 2 Appendix 2 Mr O’Connor’s Report Appendix 3 Environmental Impact Statement, Marlborough St Bridge, January 2009 Appendix 4 Relevant Provisions of the National Development Plan 2007- 2013 Appendix 5 Relevant Provisions of Transport 21 Appendix 6 Relevant Provisions of the Strategic Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area Appendix 7 Relevant Provisions of A Platform for Change Appendix 8 Relevant Provisions of the Dublin City Development Plan 2005-2011 PL29NHA0022 Appendices An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 35 Appendix 3 Mr O’Connor’s Report File no. PL29.nha 0022 Marlborough Street Public Transport Priority Bridge Proposed under Section 51 of the Roads Act (as amended) Bridge length 65 metres and width 26 metres. Bridge to provide for 2 no southbound bus lanes and one southbound LUAS line. Chosen construction type is single span reinforced concrete with low depth to length ratio. I was requested to prepare a report on the traffic and drainage issues arising from the proposed Development At the Oral Hearing the issues of traffic and drainage were raised with the Applicants and OPW, Dublin Bus and RPA representatives were also present to clarify the positions of their organisations . DRAINAGE / FLOODING The proposed bridge is a single span concrete structure with abutments which encroach into the river Liffey. It was explained that the presence of a large sewer siphon arrangement dictated the location of abutments. Mr Tim Joyce on behalf of the Office of Public Works indicated that the OPW was satisfied with the approach being taken. It was clarified that given the concerns for potential flooding great care would be taken with the Section 50 (Arterial Drainage Act 1945) application being made by Dublin City Council in respect of the bridge. The proposal to provide Dutch dams or a folding mechanism to be brought into operation in times of exceptionally high flows or tides is noted as is the City Council’s experience of operating these mechanisms. It is considered that the proposal has been subject to the correct design approach including consultation with OPW . It would not appear necessary to recommend a condition in relation to hydrological implications of the proposed development as the PL29NHA0022 Appendices An Bord Pleanála Page 2 of 35 current Section 50 Application would be deemed to cover requirements for flood protection. TRAFFIC The evidence at the hearing clarified the EIS and explained the operation and management of the bridge as a public transport link. EXISTING TRAFFIC NETWORK The road network for the immediate area comprises: Eden Quay on the north side of the river which has general traffic and a bus lane running west-east from O Connell Street. A contraflow bus lane runs east- west from Butt bridge to O Connell street and there are a number of bus terminii on the lane adjacent to the quay wall. Marlborough street joins Eden Quay at the proposed bridge location and takes general traffic and generally caters for local type journeys Burgh Quay on the south side of the river is east-west and includes a bus lane. The traffic flows can reach levels where saturation occurs between Butt bridge and O Connell street Hawkins Street joins Burgh Quay at the location of the proposed bridge and takes bus traffic and local traffic. The applicant did not include traffic flow volumes in the EIS and did not provide information on existing flows at the hearing. This would have helped clarify the assessment but as new infrastructure is under construction it allows an assessment based on the comparative conditions to be made on the proposal. IMPACTS AND ASSESSMENT From questions asked of Mr O Brien of the City Council the traffic control measures were outlined and the impacts would clearly be positive for a number of existing bus routes. Mr O Leary of Dublin Bus noted the potential for new network opportunities. PL29NHA0022 Appendices An Bord Pleanála Page 3 of 35 The potential negative impacts would be on general traffic on the north and aouth quays. Mr O Brien indicated that the proximity of both Butt Bridge at 140 m west and O Connell St Bridge at 100 m east, made linking of traffic signals somewhat problematical. However, the overall relief arising from the opening of the Samuel Beckett Bridge and the options available to the City Council in relation to limitations in traffic types would appear to indicate that any negative impacts are capable of significant mitigation. It is considered therefore that the proposal would be acceptable from a traffic viewpoint and no particular conditions would appear necessary. However it may be considered desirable that a liaison committee would be useful prior to and during construction and this could comprise the City Council and representation from RPA, Dublin Bus and OPW, taxi and city centre business interests. ______________ Daniel O Connor Engineer Gd I 8 July 2009. PL29NHA0022 Appendices An Bord Pleanála Page 4 of 35 Appendix 3 Environmental Impact Statement, Marlborough St Bridge, January 2009 Volume 1 is the main report and includes a non-technical summary which is also presented as a separate Volume. Volume 2 is a book of maps. Volume 1 comprises 15 chapters in two parts, each part preceded by a non technical summary: chapters are set out under the following headings: Non Technical Summary Part 1 Background Information and General Description Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Background to the Proposed Development Chapter 3 Description of the Proposed Development Chapter 4 Alternatives Considered Chapter 5 Traffic and Transportation Part 2 Environmental Effects and Proposed Ameliorative Measures Chapter 6 Human Beings Chapter 7 The Natural Environment Chapter 8 Landscape and Visual Analysis Chapter 9 Material Assets Chapter 10 Architectural, Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Chapter 11 Architectural Heritage Chapter 12 Construction Phase Chapter 13 Interrelationships Chapter 14 Mitigation Measures Non-technical summary Description of the Quays at Marlborough Street/Hawkins Street Eden Quay carries two eastbound traffic lanes and a westbound bus lane in the vicinity of the proposed bridge location. An eastbound cycle lane is also provided PL29NHA0022 Appendices An Bord Pleanála Page 5 of 35 north of the eastbound traffic lanes. Pedestrian crossing facilities are provided crossing Eden Quay to the west of the Eden Quay / Marlborough Street Junction. Burgh Quay carries two westbound traffic lanes and a westbound bus lane in the vicinity of the proposed bridge location. These two traffic lanes branch out to become three lanes just west of the proposed bridge site. On Burgh Quay, a westbound cycle lane is also provided, south of the westbound bus lane. Pedestrian crossing facilities are provided for crossing Hawkins Street at the Burgh Quay / Hawkins Street Junction. Significant Environmental Effects and Proposed Ameliorative Measures Under the headings: human beings, the natural environment, landscape and visual analysis, material assets, architectural, archaeological and cultural heritage, architectural heritage and construction phase, the issues which are dealt with later in the report are summarised. The paragraph, mitigation, lists the mitigation measures proposed. Mitigation Measures The principle mitigation measures proposed in the scheme are as follows: A traffic management will be prepared by the contractor and agreed with the planning authority. Hours of construction will be agreed with the planning authority to avoid later night or early morning working. Noise mitigation measures will be put in place during relevant activities. Wheel washing facilities will be put in place on site to ensure that the public road is not adversely affected by deposits from truck tyres. It is recommended that lighting ensures that the bridge is visible to birds at night. However, lights should be imbedded in the bridge structure rather than on poles which could present a potential hazard to flying birds in daylight and at night. A dust minimisation plan will be formulated for the construction phase of the project, as construction activities are likely to generate some dust emissions. A pedestrian/cyclist facility will be maintained on both quays at all times during the construction phase. In areas where disturbance of the river bed or quay is necessary as part of the construction of the proposed development, an archaeological impact assessment based on an underwater dive survey, a low tide visual survey and a metal detection survey should be carried out by a suitably qualified underwater archaeologist licensed by the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. An underwater archaeological assessment and metal detection survey are currently being undertaken. The results of the underwater archaeological assessment will be reviewed and any recommended mitigation measures will be carried out. In areas where removal of sections of quay wall is necessary an architectural survey should be undertaken prior to the removal of any material. The survey should be overseen by a suitably qualified archaeologist or architect. PL29NHA0022 Appendices An Bord Pleanála Page 6 of 35 Part 1 Background Information and General Description Chapter 1 Introduction This includes the legal requirements that are met in the presentation of the EIS to the Board, and refers to the statutory and non-statutory consultation which has taken place. I consider this section to be satisfactory. There are not any outstanding issues. Chapter 2 Background to the Proposed Development This deals with the purpose of the project, description of the quays and lists the parties consulted. A list of consultees is contained at page 2/3 and a summary of responses received is included on pages 2/5 to 2/9. The lists include: Office of Public Works (Tim Joyce) and Minister for Environment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liffey Estuary (Upper and Lower) Report 2010
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the help and co -operation of the Director Mr. William Walsh and staff from IFI Blackrock as well as various other offices throughout the region. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the help and cooperation of their colleagues in IFI Swords . We would like to thank the landowners and angling clubs that granted us access to their land and respective fisheries. We would also like to thank Dr. Martin O’ Grady (IFI) and No. 3 Operational Wing, Irish Air Corps (Aer Chór na hÉireann) for the aerial photographs. PROJECT STAFF Project Director/Senior Research officer: Dr. Fiona Kelly Project Manager: Dr. Andrew Harrison Research Officer: Dr. Ronan Matson Research Officer: Ms. Lynda Connor Technician: Ms. Roisín O’Callaghan Technician Mr. Rory Feeney Technician: Ms. Emma Morrissey Technician: Mrs. Ciara Wögerbauer GIS Officer: Mr. Kieran Rocks Fisheries Assistant: Ms. Gráinne Hanna (Oct 2010 – Dec 2010) Fisheries Assistant: Mr. Kevin Gallagher (Oct 2010 – Dec 2010) The authors would also like to acknowledge the funding provided for the project from the Department of Communications Energy and Natural Resources for 2010. The report includes Ordnance Survey Ireland data reproduced under OS I Copyright Permit No. MP 007508. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland copyright. © Ordnance Survey Ireland , 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Liffey Cycle Route
    To the Lord Mayor and Report No. 90/2020 Members of Dublin City Council Report of the Chief Executive _________________________________________________________________________ The Liffey Cycle Route _________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction This report has been prepared in response to representations from Members, requesting that the Liffey Cycle Route (LCR) be implemented on a trial basis. It discusses the feasibility and makes recommendations on an interim scheme that could be trialled. The interim scheme, if approved by Members would be implemented in phases and completed by August 2020. The provision of a dedicated cycle route along the Quays has been an objective in the Dublin City Council Development Plan (CDP) since the 2011-2017 CDP. It is an objective of the current CDP and since 2013 the Environment and Transportation Department (E&TD) has been attempting to put in place a dedicated cycle route along the Quays. The problem of space is a key element of the difficulties of this route as the Quays varies from a four lane road to sections which are barely two lane and has resulted in multiple options being unable to find approval. In March 2019, Dublin City Council (DCC) received the Emerging Preferred Option for the permanent design of the LCR from the National Transport Authority (NTA). The design was presented at a special meeting of the Transport SPC, held on April 3rd 2019 and approved by Members at the City Council Meeting in May 2019. This was a major milestone in the project as it now allowed a project team to be formed and stakeholder consultation to commence.
    [Show full text]
  • Council 08 Jul 2021 Pdf 2.96MB Dublin Coastal Flooding Protection
    Final Report Volume 1 - Main Report Dublin City Council Fingal County Council 29 April 2005 Final Report 9M2793 A COMPANY OF ROYAL HASKONING COASTAL & RIVERS 19 Baggot Street Lower Dublin 2 Ireland +353 (0)1 634 5353 Telephone +353 (0)1 634 5305 Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title Final Report Volume 1 - Main Report Document short title Status Final Report Date 29 April 2005 Project name Dublin Coastal Flooding Protection Project Project number 9M2793 Client Dublin City Council Reference 9M2793 Drafted by Owen Mc Manus/Ian Cooke/John Greenyer Checked by Eric Huyskes Date/initials check …………………. …………………. Approved by Steve Magenis Date/initials approval …………………. …………………. CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General 1 1.2 Scope, Objectives and Project Aims 1 1.3 Sponsoring Authorities 3 1.4 The Dublin Coastal Flooding Protection Project in the Context of the European SAFER Initiative 3 1.4.1 INTERREG III B 3 1.4.2 SAFER 3 1.5 Description of the Project Area 5 1.5.1 Fingal County Council 5 1.5.2 Dublin City Council 6 2 FEBRUARY 2002 EVENT 11 2.1 General Description 11 2.2 Weather Conditions 12 2.2.1 The General Situation 12 2.2.2 The Detailed Meteorological Situation 12 2.3 Marine and Irish Sea Conditions 13 2.4 Fluvial Conditions 13 2.5 UK Met Office Surge Model 14 3 FEBRUARY 2002 FLOODED AREAS 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 Fingal County Council 16 3.2.1 Portmarnock to Baldoyle 16 3.2.2 Sutton 17 3.3 Dublin City Council 18 3.3.1 Dublin City Council – North City Flooding 18 3.3.2 East Wall – Royal
    [Show full text]
  • The IAF's Architreks Are Specially Designed Architecture Activity
    Meeting House Square, Temple Bar Meeting House Square, Temple Architrek Crampton Buildings, Asdill’s Row Temple Bar The IAF’s Architreks are specially designed architecture activity sheets for families, full of observation games, sketching and quizzes that guide you along selected routes. Temple Bar is an area in Dublin city follow the centre, located between the River Liffey and Dame Street. Explore architecture route... old and new, cultural buildings and public spaces with this Architrek! 6 2 4 3 1 5 7 Draw or sketch Investigate Use paper provided Create a structure Make a rubbing Quiz time Four of the panels are unfinished. Can you draw additional scenes relating to hygiene (think COVID-19), or advertising in the city? 1 sunlight chambers advertising Sunlight Chambers at the corner of Can you identify some of the Parliament Street and Essex Quay was activities illustrated in the panels? completed in 1905 as the Irish headquarters ................................................................ of Lever Brothers (now Unilever). It was ................................................................ designed by English architect Edward Ould. ................................................................ ................................................................ Glazed ceramic friezes above the ground and first floor windows advertise ................................................................ ................................................................ Sunlight soap. Think of this building as an The building itself is Italianate in style. advertisement – in the years before radio, ................................................................ Sketch some of the unusual television or the internet – or a giant architectural details – such as the billboard or educational comic strip. It sits overhanging roof / eaves at the top on the corner of a busy junction, where (with the carved, figurative brackets), Grattan Bridge meets the quays, and is the porch canopy over the entrance ideally suited to be seen by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Dublin Bus Core Route
    City Centre Map Destination Finder Core Route Diagram re Upper Dominick Street t Parnell Square East A B S C D E F G H l l t i e Parnell Street Gloucster Place Lower H s Garden of r Parnell SquareRemembrance North n o Seville Place o D i Dublin Bust r Lower Sean Macdermott Street e u Parnell Square West t p i t p Rotunda Parnell Street Key City Centres Routes U Hospital n Lower Gardiner Street IRISH RAIL o Gate Railway Street Amiens Street This map shows the C stops serving the most Theatre 1 Lower Oriel Street 1 frequent and popularPrebendStreet key routes operating 4725 Cathal Brugha Street James Joyce Street into and out of the city centre. 4508 Marlborough Street Lower Dominick Street Parnell Street Seville Place To find your stop use the destination finder in 278 Foley Street Lower Sheriff Street the tab above. Henrietta Place Bolton Street 281 DART 272 Mabbot Lane Connolly Upper Oriel Street King’s Inns Street Savoy For Real Time Passenger Information Rail Cinema Talbot Street Dublin 277 Station click on the stop numbers 1184 t Bus Store Street Lower Sheriff Street e Amiens StreetLUAS re Head 270 St Parnell Street Office g 4724 in Moo Cathedral St. Green Street Green Cineworld th K Talbot Street Upper Church Street r Street O’Connell o Ilac re 2 N Cinema Henry Place 274 2 Shopping Street 6059 CommonsStreet Marlborough Street Centre 279 Earl Street Busáras Parnell Street O’Connell Street Earl Place Marlborough Place Jervis Street LUAS Wolf Tone Street Irish Life Mall George’s Dock BeresfordStreet 288 Henry Street GPO George’s Dock
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Worst Junctions in Dublin
    Dublin Cycling Campaign PO Box 10295 Dublin 6w [email protected] www.dublincycling.ie 2011- January 18th Dublin City Council Cycle Forum Re: Schedule of dangerous places for cyclists in Dublin. The cyclists’ view The Dublin Cycling Campaign recently asked its members and friends which parts of the Dublin street fabric they find could benefit from re-design. This report sets out the feedback received, under the following headings- 1. The Quays- including bridges and surrounding roads 2. North City centre 3. South City centre 4. North city outside canals 5. South city outside canals The ten junctions most cited in our survey are printed in red. Illustrations have been copied from Google Maps and other sources where possible. One constantly-recurring feature of the feedback is the fear and danger arising from multi-lane systems. 1 1. The Quays Grattan bridge, turning right onto Essex Quay, the bridge is one way and cars are pushing behind and you're not sure which side of the lane you should cycle: very dangerous! Talbot Memorial Bridge [1] Heading left on to city quay, you're directed off road on the corner, conflict with peds and lose priority when joining the road after the corner [2] Heading straight or heading right, the time delay on the toucan crossing can take ages even when there’s light traffic. 2 Ormond Quay junction with Jervis Street Presence & position of cycle lane encourages cars to turn left across cyclists and knock them over. Victoria Quay (just outside Guinness gate), turning right on to Frank Sherwin Bridge (to then turn left to go up to the Pheonix Park), cyclists need to go from the bus lane to the third of four lanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Amsterdam, Netherlands Overview Introduction
    Amsterdam, Netherlands Overview Introduction Tell anyone you're going to Amsterdam and there's a fair chance they'll either sigh with envy or give you a sly nod. Amsterdam's reputation for tolerance laced with sin precedes it, but equally renowned are its scenic and cultural attractions. Amsterdam hotels are known for their cleanliness and hospitality, its restaurants offer world cuisine, and along the city streets is a shopper's paradise. Most visitors fall in love with the city and return again and again. Amsterdam is nourished by a wealth of museums, concert halls, and avant-garde theater and dance venues. Its relaxed and tolerant attitudes draw those looking for a creative, anything-goes atmosphere. Large numbers of beautiful tree-lined canals are bordered by streets with rows of narrow, gabled houses and 17th-century warehouses, making Amsterdam an architectural treasure trove. Amsterdam is much smaller in population (but no less interesting) than many European capitals. As a result, much of the city center can be comfortably explored on foot—or, if you want to look like a true local, by bicycle. Highlights Sights—The Westerkerk (West Church) on the Prinsengracht and the spectacular view from its tower; gabled mansions on the 17th-century canal ring inside the Singelgracht; the Anne Frank Huis; the Red Light District; Amsterdam-Noord. Museums—Rembrandts at the Rijksmuseum; the Van Gogh Museum; the Stedelijk Museum. Memorable Meals—Smoked eel at Haesje Claes; french fries with mayonnaise or peanut-butter sauce from the rear end of the Albert Cuyp Markt; rijsttafel at Tempo Doeloe; salted or pickled herring from one of the fish stands along the canals; traditional Dutch fare at Moeders; international dishes from Food Hallen.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 1 Stanczyk.Indd
    Mosty Dublina ANDRZEJ STAŃCZYK Irlandia – nieduża, zielona wyspa Politechnika Warszawska – ulubiony azyl naszych emigran- [email protected] tów. Wiecznie wilgotna i ciepła za przyczyną Atlantyku i Golfsztromu, zapewnia znakomite warunki we- getacji. Nie tylko roślin. W samolocie tanich linii angielskich z Polski do Belfastu i podczas podniebnego powrotu sły- chać szczebiot kilkuletnich dzieci po polsku. To młode mał- żeństwa z dwojgiem, trojgiem maleńkich pociech, także z niemowlętami, lecą na wakacje do dziadków w Polsce lub wracają od nich do nowej, przyjaznej im ojczyzny. Też jakby „przedmurza” srodze doświadczonego w historii przez protestanckich sąsiadów. W hotelach i restauracjach można porozumieć się w naszym języku, a w kościołach trafić na mszę dla rodaków. Wyprawa zorganizowana przez nestora krakowskich mo- stowców – profesora Kazimierza Flagę – wiodła na mosty, a że w programie przewidziano też kilka średniowiecznych zamków, to była nadzieja na zdjęcia prowadzących do nich mostów. Być może zwodzonych nad fosami. W większej ich liczbie ujawniłyby się jakieś podobieństwa… podstawy do uogólnień. Nic z tego. Przy zamkach nie było fos. Nawet suchych. Ani mostów… a jeśli nawet były dawniej, to dziś ustąpiły miejsca nasypom i wyasfaltowanym drogom dojaz- dowym. Lecz ponieważ drogi te wiodą dawnymi szlakami – przebiegają też po dawnych mostach sklepionych z ciosów kamiennych. Kamień, materiał miejscowy, łatwo dostępny, odporny, ponadczasowy, więc i mostów przetrwało niemało. W większości – podobne. Wystarczy kilka zdjęć (fot. 1). Kulminacją wyprawy były mosty w Dublinie. Mieszanka dawnych i współczesnych. Wśród nich dwa mosty Santiago Calatravy. Niewiele jest miast, gdzie ten słynny architekt i mostowiec postawił więcej niż jeden obiekt. Można przy- puszczać, że polubił to miasto…, wszak Dublin to koleb- ka piwa Guiness i whisky Jameson.
    [Show full text]
  • The Samuel Beckett Bridge Is the Latest Addition to Dublin's
    The New Bridge An Droichead Nua he Samuel Beckett Bridge is the latest addition to Dublin’s s é Droichead Samuel Beckett an droichead is nua sa liosta impressive inventory of Liffey bridges. Located in the heart of suntasach de dhroichid thar an Life. Agus é lonnaithe i gcroílár Dublin’s docklands it provides a valuable new link between cheantar dugaí Bhaile Átha Cliath, nasc tábhachtach is ea é idir Tthe north and south quays in the area. The iconic structure was Icéanna thuaidh agus céanna theas an cheantair. Ba é Comhairle Cath- commissioned by Dublin City Council and designed by the internation- rach Bhaile Átha Cliath a choimisiúnaigh an struchtúr sonraíoch agus ally acclaimed artist, architect and engineer Santiago Calatrava. ba é an ealaíontóir, ailtire agus innealtóir cáiliúil Santiago Calatrava a rinne é a dhearadh. The concept for the bridge came from Calatrava’s glance at the harp on the back of an Irish coin, leading him to be inspired to design a Nuair a d’fhéach Calatrava ar an gcláirseach ar chúl bhoinn Éireann- bridge that reflected the shape of the national emblem. Its curved pylon aigh tháinig coincheap an droichid chuige, agus spreag sé é droichead produces a dramatic shape giving the appearance of a harp lying on a dhearadh a mbeadh an feathal náisiúnta le brath air. Tugann an piolón its side. The structure is a magnificent paradox of slenderness and cuartha cruth drámata dó, amhail is dá mbeadh cláirseach ina luí ar a strength that embellishes the cityscape, particularly when it is illumi- thaobh. Paradacsa iontach is ea an struchtúr sa chaoi is a bhfuil sé nated against the night sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Liffey Model DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET
    Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report – DRAFT FINAL Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report Lower Liffey Model DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title Eastern CFRAM Study Document Title IBE0600Rp0027_HA09 Hydraulics Report Model Name Lower Liffey Rev. Status Author Checked By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date D01 Draft M.Houston A. Sloan I. Bentley Belfast 12/02/2014 D02 Draft M.Houston A. Sloan S. Patterson Belfast 11/07/2014 D03 Draft A. Sloan S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 13/01/2015 F01 Draft Final A. Sloan S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 13/03/2015 F02 Draft Final A. Sloan S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 13/08/2015 F03 Draft Final A. Sloan S. Patterson G. Glasgow Belfast 05/08/2016 IBE0600Rp00027 Rev F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report – DRAFT FINAL Table of Reference Reports Report Issue Date Report Reference Relevant Section Eastern CFRAM Study Flood Risk December IBE0600Rp0001_Flood Risk 3.2.3 Review 2011 Review_F02 Eastern CFRAM Study Inception August 2012 IBE0600Rp0008_HA09 Inception Various Report UoM09 Report_F02 Eastern CFRAM Study Hydrology September IBE0600Rp0016_HA09_Hydrology 4.4 Report UoM09 2013 Report_F01 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Liffey November 2001s4884- SC2 Survey Report v1 Various Survey Contract Report 2012 IBE0600Rp00027 Rev F03 Eastern CFRAM Study HA09 Hydraulics Report – DRAFT FINAL 4 HYDRAULIC MODEL DETAILS 4.7 LOWER LIFFEY MODEL 4.7.1 General Hydraulic Model Information (1) Introduction: On the basis of a review of historic flooding and the extent of flood risk determined during the PFRA, the Eastern CFRAM Flood Risk Review (IBE0600Rp0027_Flood Risk Review) highlighted the River Liffey in Dublin City AFA as a HPW, subject to both fluvial and coastal flood risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendix I Land Use Matrix
    APPENDICES APPENDIX I LAND USE MATRIX LAND USE Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5 Z6 Z7 Z7A Z8 Z9 Z10 Z11 Z12* Z13* Z14 Z15 Advertisements and OOOOOO O Advertisement Structures Amusement/Leisure YY OO O Y Complex ATM YYYYYY Y Y Bed and Breakfast O Y Y Y O O Y Y Betting Office O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Boarding Kennels Y Y Buildings for the health, YYYYY OOO Y Y safety and welfare of the public Caravan Park (Holiday) O Car Park O Y Y Y Y Y Y O O Y Casual Trading O O O O Chemical Processing and YY Storage Childcare Facility Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O Y Y Civic Amenity/Recycling O OOOOYY O Y Centre Civic Offices Y Y O Y Community Facility Y Y Y Y O O O O Y Conference Centre O Y Y O Y Cultural/recreational OOYYYYOOYOY Y building and uses Discount Food Store O O Education Y Y Y Y O Y Y Y Embassy Y O O O Y Y O Y Enterprise Centre Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O Y Funeral Home O O Y O O O Garages – Motor Repair O O O Y Y O Garden Centre O Y Y O O Golf Course and Clubhouse O O Guest House O Y Y Y O O Y Y Y Halting Site Y Y Y Y Heavy Vehicle Park Y Y Home-based Economic YYYYY Y Y Y Activity Hostel O Y Y Y Y Y O Hotel O Y Y Y O O Y Y Y Household Fuel Centre O O O Y Y Incinerator/waste to energy Y plant Industrial Building Y Y Y O Industrial Process O Y Y Internet Cafe and Call YYYO Y Y Centre Light Industrial Building O Y Y O Y Y Y O Live Work Units O O Y Y Y Y O Y Y 228 APPENDIX I Land Use Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5 Z6 Z7 Z7A Z8 Z9 Z10 Z11 Z12* Z13* Z14 Z15 Media recording and general OOOYYYOO O Y media associated uses Medical and related YYYYY Y Y Y consultants Motor Sales Showroom Y Y O Y Y Y O Nightclub
    [Show full text]
  • (Inter)National Naming: Heritage, Conflict and Diaspora
    (Inter)national Naming: Heritage, Conflict and Diaspora Yvonne Whelan1 School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol Bristol, BS8 1SS, United Kingdom [email protected] In May 2009 a new bridge was slowly maneuvered into place in the center of Dublin, Ireland’s capital city. The latest addition to the succession of bridges that span the river Liffey, it is known as the Samuel Beckett Bridge in honour of the Nobel Prize-winning Irish author and dramatist. When opened in 2009, this new bridge joined the James Joyce Bridge and the Sean O’Casey Bridge, unveiled in 2003 and 2005 respectively, and so-named to commemorate two more of Ireland’s most famous literary figures. The attachment of this literary triumvirate to three of Dublin’s most recent, large-scale infrastructural developments stands in sharp contrast to the names that were in vogue in the decades that followed the achievement of Irish political independence in 1922. It is also richly suggestive of a new trend at work in the practice of place naming, one that compels us to interrogate more closely the links between the contemporary commodification of the past and its representation in street and place names. In the heady days of the post-independence period, local authorities used nomenclature to inscribe a specific version of Irish national identity into the landscape. In a process that has been mirrored in countless post-revolutionary contexts, a series of symbolic acts of reclamation were set in train. New streets were named, and existing thoroughfares renamed, many of them in honour of Irish revolutionaries and political figures.
    [Show full text]