Study on Best Practices for ICT Procurement Based on Standards in Order to Promote Efficiency and Reduce Lock-In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Study on Best Practices for ICT Procurement Based on Standards in Order to Promote Efficiency and Reduce Lock-In Study on best practices for ICT procurement based on standards in order to promote efficiency and reduce lock-in FINAL REPORT A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by: Digital Agenda for Europe This study was carried out for the European Commission by PwC EU services Giovanna Galasso, Senior Manager Federico Aresu, Senior Consultant Maria Luppi, Senior Consultant Clara Campisi, Consultant Giorgio Garbasso, Consultant Internal identification Contract number: 30-CE-0601961/00-29 SMART 2013/0048 ISBN 978-92-79-54925-0 doi:10.2759/701784 DISCLAIMER By the European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Copyright © 2016 – European Union. All rights reserved. Certain parts are licensed under conditions to the EU. 2 Contents 1. ABSTRACT 8 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 3. INTRODUCTION 13 4. PROJECT RESULTS: AN OVERVIEW 16 4.1. AWARENESS CREATION AROUND “LOCK IN” AND DISSEMINATION OF THE GUIDE 17 4.1.1. The Guide: Using standards for ICT procurement 17 4.1.2. Joinup Community: Open Standards for ICT procurement 19 4.1.3. Launch & running of an effective communication campaign 20 4.1.1. Lessons learned 22 4.2. COMMUNITY BUILDING 24 4.2.1. Set-up and running of bi-annual workshops 24 4.2.2. Brainstorming events (webinars) and online engagement 28 4.2.3. Lessons learned 32 4.3. COLLECTION OF BEST PRACTICES 33 4.3.1. ICT Frameworks and Architectures 36 4.3.2. Guidelines and Knowledge on Standards 39 4.3.3. Standards Assessment 42 4.3.4. List of Recommended Standards 44 4.3.5. ICT Needs & Long Term Planning 46 4.3.6. Develop a Procurement Framework 47 4.3.7. Templates and Ready Texts 49 4.3.8. Others 51 4.3.9. Lessons learned 52 4.4. MONITORING OF TAKE-UP OF “OPEN” PROCUREMENT 54 4.4.1. TED Analysis 55 4.4.2. Survey Results’ analysis 174 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOLLOW UP 191 6. ANNEXES 193 6.1. COLLECTED BEST PRACTICES 193 6.1.1. ICT Frameworks and Architectures 193 6.1.2. Guidelines and Knowledge on Standards 200 6.1.3. Standards Assessment 207 6.1.4. List of Recommended Standards 210 3 6.1.5. ICT Needs & Long Term Planning 215 6.1.6. Develop a Procurement Framework 217 6.1.7. Templates and ready texts 218 6.1.8. Other 224 6.2. TASK 4 MATERIALS (TED ANALYSIS & PROCUREMENT SURVEY) 226 6.2.1. List of CPV analysed 226 6.2.2. List of vendors 227 6.2.3. TED Variable analysis: focus on the analysed scope 228 6.2.4. List of vendors not included in the algorithm, as identified by the multilinguistic check (not exhaustive) 230 6.2.5. Overview of vendor presence and contra-legem tenders by country 231 6.2.6. Survey 232 6.3. WORKSHOP REPORTS 237 6.3.1. Workshop report 1 237 6.3.2. Workshop report 2 257 6.3.3. Workshop report 3 281 6.3.4. Workshop report 4 301 6.4. DATASETS 319 6.4.1. Dataset_TED_preliminary_analysis_final 319 6.4.2. Dataset_TED_vendor_search_final 319 7. References 320 4 List of Figures Figure 1: Project’s structure ............................................................................................ 16 Figure 2: Incidence of low competition awards in EU28 .................................................... 160 Figure 3: Number of contra-legem mentions, and incidence of contra-legem tenders on total tenders, by year .......................................................................................................... 162 Figure 4: Contra-legem mentions and tenders by country ................................................. 163 Figure 5: Incidence of contra-legem tenders on all tenders issued, by country. ................... 166 Figure 6 Percentage of contra-legem tenders by CPV ....................................................... 167 Figure 7: Top 20 brands by mention frequency in contra legemcontra-legem tenders ........... 167 Figure 8: Tender notices referring to specific trademarks per trademark and country ........... 168 Figure 9: Contra-legem tenders by Contracting Authority type .......................................... 169 Figure 10: Respondents distribution by country ............................................................... 175 Figure 11: Respondents by organisation type .................................................................. 175 Figure 12: Respondents by professional role ................................................................... 176 Figure 13: Distribution of ICT expenditure per goods and services and % of expenditure above EU thresholds. ............................................................................................................. 177 Figure 14: Countermeasures adoption against ICT lock-in ................................................. 180 Figure 15: Preferred procedures for ICT procurement ....................................................... 181 Figure 16: Main drivers for the "make-or-buy" decision .................................................... 182 Figure 17: Control measures on IT and legal capabilities of procurement teams .................. 183 Figure 18: Importance of different aims when planning an ICT purchase ............................ 184 Figure 19: Reference to ICT procurement standards in tender notices (%) .......................... 185 Figure 20: Successful initiatives against ICT lock-in in respondents' words .......................... 187 Figure 21: Awareness of CAMSS .................................................................................... 189 5 List of Tables and charts Table 1- Categories of stakeholders ......................................................................... 21 Table 2 - List of Workshops .................................................................................... 24 Table 3 - List of Webinars ...................................................................................... 29 Table 4 – List of Good Practices ............................................................................. 34 Table 5 Contract Award Notices (CANs) per year ..................................................... 158 Table 6 Participation to ICT public procurement ...................................................... 160 Table 7 Incidence of contra-legem tenders by CPV .................................................. 166 Chart 1 – Typologies of mapped stakeholders ........................................................... 21 Chart 2 – Participants per country ........................................................................... 26 Chart 3 – Types of Participants organisations ............................................................ 26 Chart 4 - Results of the Workshop evaluation questionnaires ...................................... 27 6 List of Acronyms Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation Und Neue BITKOM Medien E. V CA Contract Award CAMSS Common Assessment Method for Standards and Specifications CAN Contract Award Notice CPV Common Procurement Vocabulary EC European Commission EIF European Interoperability Framework EU European Union EUPL European Union Public Licence GITC Government Information Technology and Communications GPA Government Procurement Agreement ICT Information and communications technology ISA Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations MITA Malta Information Technology Agency MS Member State MSP Multi-Stakeholder Platform on ICT standardisation NIFO National Interoperability Framework Observatory OASC Open & Agile Smart Cities OFE Open Forum Europe PMO Project Management Office RP Rolling Plan on ICT standardisation SIRIP State Information Resources Interoperability Platform SNPB Swedish National Police Board TED Tenders Electronic Daily 7 1. ABSTRACT The “Study on best Practices for ICT procurement based on standards in order to promote efficiency and reduce lock-in”, carried out by PwC between January 2014 and January 2016, aims primarily at supporting the European Commission in building a community of people related to the field of public procurement of ICT systems and services, willing to share best practices on how to make better use of standards in public procurement in order to solve ICT lock-in. The project has been structured around four interrelated tasks, dedicated to raise awareness on the concept of “lock-in”, mainly through the enhancement and dissemination of the “Guide for the procurement of standards-based ICT” and the creation of an online community, to build an active network of stakeholders, to collect examples of good practice, and to monitor the take-up of “open” ICT procurement. 8 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scope of the Final Report This is the Final Report of the “Study on best Practices for ICT procurement based on standards in order to promote efficiency and reduce lock-in” carried out by PwC between January 2014 and January 2016. The Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use of the information contained therein. The objective of this Study is to support the European Commission in building a community of people concerned with the public procurement of ICT systems and services. It also aims at sharing best practices on how to make better use of standards in public procurement
Recommended publications
  • Op E N So U R C E Yea R B O O K 2 0
    OPEN SOURCE YEARBOOK 2016 ..... ........ .... ... .. .... .. .. ... .. OPENSOURCE.COM Opensource.com publishes stories about creating, adopting, and sharing open source solutions. Visit Opensource.com to learn more about how the open source way is improving technologies, education, business, government, health, law, entertainment, humanitarian efforts, and more. Submit a story idea: https://opensource.com/story Email us: [email protected] Chat with us in Freenode IRC: #opensource.com . OPEN SOURCE YEARBOOK 2016 . OPENSOURCE.COM 3 ...... ........ .. .. .. ... .... AUTOGRAPHS . ... .. .... .. .. ... .. ........ ...... ........ .. .. .. ... .... AUTOGRAPHS . ... .. .... .. .. ... .. ........ OPENSOURCE.COM...... ........ .. .. .. ... .... ........ WRITE FOR US ..... .. .. .. ... .... 7 big reasons to contribute to Opensource.com: Career benefits: “I probably would not have gotten my most recent job if it had not been for my articles on 1 Opensource.com.” Raise awareness: “The platform and publicity that is available through Opensource.com is extremely 2 valuable.” Grow your network: “I met a lot of interesting people after that, boosted my blog stats immediately, and 3 even got some business offers!” Contribute back to open source communities: “Writing for Opensource.com has allowed me to give 4 back to a community of users and developers from whom I have truly benefited for many years.” Receive free, professional editing services: “The team helps me, through feedback, on improving my 5 writing skills.” We’re loveable: “I love the Opensource.com team. I have known some of them for years and they are 6 good people.” 7 Writing for us is easy: “I couldn't have been more pleased with my writing experience.” Email us to learn more or to share your feedback about writing for us: https://opensource.com/story Visit our Participate page to more about joining in the Opensource.com community: https://opensource.com/participate Find our editorial team, moderators, authors, and readers on Freenode IRC at #opensource.com: https://opensource.com/irc .
    [Show full text]
  • Free and Open Source Software Across the EU 153
    Free and Open Source Software Across the EU 153 Free and Open Source Software Across the EU Gijs Hillenius(a) (a) Journalist, contributor to Joinup DOI: 10.5033/ifosslr.v5i2.90 Abstract Across the EU, there is a groundswe of pu& ic ad'inistrations that use open source for their I() so utions. E!idence of its benefits as we as practica e*a'p es are steadi y pi ing up at the European Co''ission's Open Source O&ser!atory. The areas where this t+pe of so ution can be found most inc ude, in rando' order$ content mana%e'ent ((.S/, document mana%e'ent (D.S/, data&ase app ications, a kinds of on ine e1%o!ernment ser!ices, geo-infor'ation s+ste's (2IS/ and in 'ost if not a pu& ic y pro!ided app ications bui t to use open data. Keywords 3u& ic ad'inistrations; European Union; Joinup; Free and Open Source Software Po icies; i'p e'entations. 6hen it co'es to free and open source software -FOSS/$ 'an+ pu& ic ad'inistrations wi ha!e stu'& ed across it. )hese da+s, their I) dea er te s the' that their proprietar+ s+ste' for 'ana%in% citi7en records wi function 8ust as we with the open source data&ase 'ana%e'ent s+ste' 3ost%res9 $ +et the su&scription fee is 'uch ower than when co'&ined with the pre!ious + re9uired proprietary a ternati!e.1 For others, switchin% to free and open source is increasin% + a conscious decision.
    [Show full text]
  • EIRA Overview
    Delivered in the context of ABC-IV-66 An introduction to the European Interoperability Reference Architecture (EIRA©) v3.0.0 EIRA EUROPEAN INTEROPERABILITY REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE European Interoperability Reference Architecture (EIRA©) v3.0.0 Change Control Modification Details Version 3.0.0 ABBs definition update All the ABBs definitions have been reviewed and a section referring to the interoperability saliency have been introduced, in order to highlight the ABB’s interoperability relevance for EU integrated public services. EIF is the framework against which interoperability saliency has been assessed, per each ABB. EIRA viewpoints New viewpoints have been added in order to align the model to the New introduction and update European Interoperability Framework. Existing viewpoints have been reviewed. Examples ABB examples have been reviewed. In particular, obsolete examples have been replaced with up-to-date ones. Version 2.1.0 Introduction of a new A new viewpoint has been added to match the “Conceptual Model for viewpoint: Conceptual Integrated Service Provisioning” as it is provided in the New European Model for Integrated Interoperability Framework. Service Provisioning Examples Architecture Building Blocks have received examples to guide the user in the type of implementation that can be imagined for these building blocks. Synonyms Added synonyms to selected Architecture Building Blocks Version 2.0.0 ArchiMate® 3 upgrade EIRA© v1.2.2 was aligned with ArchiMate® 2.1, EIRA© v2.0.0 is aligned with ArchiMate® 3.0 Introduction to the
    [Show full text]
  • O2/A5 Final Release All Content
    Project title: Free Open Source Software for SMEs Project activity: O2/A5 Final Release All content The European Commission’s support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorse- ment of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held re- sponsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. CONTEXT Grant agreement 2017-1-EL01-KA202-036112 Programme Erasmus+ Key action Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices Action Strategic Partnerships Project acronym FOSS4SMEs Project title Free Open Source Software for SMEs Project starting date 01/10/2017 Project duration 24 months Project end date 30/09/2019 Project Activity (A) Intellectual Output (IO) Multiplier Event (E) O2/A5 Final Release Short-term joint staff training events (C) Document title O2/A5 Final Release Nature of document Service Dissemination level PUBLIC Due date of document M21 Produced All partners . 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Unit 1: INTRODUCING FOSS ....................................................................................................... 5 . Lesson 1.1: Defining FOSS and the difference with proprietary software ......................... 7 . U1.L1. Part 1 - A historical background .......................................................................... 8 . U1.L1. Part 2 - Guiding principles: The four freedoms ................................................... 9 . U1.L1. Part 3 - The definition of FOSS .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Isa Work Programme 2016 Annex I
    ISA2 WORK PROGRAMME 2016 ANNEX I DETAILED ACTION DESCRIPTIONS 1. KEY AND GENERIC INTEROPERABILITY ENABLERS 4 1.1 ACCESS TO BASE REGISTRIES (2016.28) 5 1.2 CATALOGUE OF SERVICES (2016.29) 13 1.3 DATA COMMUNICATION NETWORK SERVICE (TESTA / TESTA NG) (2016.02) 22 1.4 IPV6 FRAMEWORK FOR EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS (2016.09) 29 1.5 TRUSTED EXCHANGE PLATFORM (E-TRUSTEX) (2016.19) 36 1.6 INTEROPERABILITY AGREEMENTS ON ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT AND ELECTRONIC FILE (2016.26) 48 2. SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY 54 2.1 SEMIC: PROMOTING SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY AMONGST THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES (2016.07) 55 2.2 SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY FOR REPRESENTATION POWERS AND MANDATES (2016.12) 78 2.3 PUBLIC MULTILINGUAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET (2016.16) 86 3. ACCESS TO DATA / DATA SHARING / OPEN DATA 99 3.1 SHARING STATISTICAL PRODUCTION AND DISSEMINATION SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS IN THE EUROPEAN STATISTICAL SYSTEM (2016.06) 100 3.2 FISMA: FINANCIAL DATA STANDARDISATION (2016.15) 121 3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN DATA SERVICE, SUPPORT AND TRAINING PACKAGE IN THE AREA OF LINKED OPEN DATA, DATA VISUALISATION AND PERSISTENT IDENTIFICATION (2016.18) 131 3.4 AUTOMATIC BUSINESS REPORTING (2016.11) 142 3.6 BIG DATA FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS (2016.03) 147 4. GEOSPATIAL SOLUTIONS 160 4.1 EUROPEAN LOCATION INTEROPERABILITY SOLUTIONS FOR E-GOVERNMENT (ELISE) (2016.10) 161 5. E-PROCUREMENT / E-INVOICING – SUPPORTING INSTRUMENTS 195 5.1 EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT INTEROPERABILITY INITIATIVE (2016.05) 196 6. DECISION MAKING AND LEGISLATION – SUPPORTING INSTRUMENTS 226 6.1 PARTICIPATORY KNOWLEDGE FOR SUPPORTING DECISION MAKING (2016.04) 227 6.2 LEGISLATION INTEROPERABILITY TOOLS – LEGIT (2016.38) 242 6.3 ICT IMPLICATIONS OF EU LEGISLATION (2016.23) 257 6.4 EUROPEAN LEGISLATION IDENTIFIER (2016.08) 265 6.5 THEMIS - APPLICATION OF EU LAW: PROVISION OF CROSS SECTOR COMMUNICATION AND PROBLEM SOLVING TOOLS (2016.01) 278 6.6 INTERINSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL OLP MANAGEMENT (2016.17) 292 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Development of a Service for Software Interrelationships
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/ Masterarbeit ist in der Hauptbibliothek der Tech- nischen Universität Wien aufgestellt und zugänglich. http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at The approved original version of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology. http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/eng Design and Development of a Service for Software Interrelationships Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Ingenieur im Rahmen des Studiums Software Engineering & Internet Computing eingereicht von Nikola Ilo Matrikelnummer 0925955 an der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität Wien Betreuung: Thomas Grechenig Mitwirkung: Mario Bernhart Wien, 6. Oktober 2014 (Unterschrift Verfasser/In) (Unterschrift Betreuung) Technische Universität Wien A-1040 Wien Karlsplatz 13 Tel. +43-1-58801-0 www.tuwien.ac.at Design and Development of a Service for Software Interrelationships Master’s Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Diplom-Ingenieur in Software Engineering & Internet Computing by Nikola Ilo Registration Number 0925955 to the Faculty of Informatics at the Vienna University of Technology Advisor: Thomas Grechenig Assistance: Mario Bernhart Vienna, October 6, 2014 (Signature of Author) (Signature of Advisor) Technische Universität Wien A-1040 Wien Karlsplatz 13 Tel. +43-1-58801-0 www.tuwien.ac.at Statement by Author Nikola Ilo Pfalzauerstraße 60, 3021 Pressbaum Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich diese Arbeit selbständig verfasst habe, dass ich die verwendeten Quellen und Hilfsmittel vollständig angegeben habe und dass ich die Stellen der Arbeit – einschließlich Tabellen, Karten und Abbildungen –, die anderen Werken oder dem Internet im Wortlaut oder dem Sinn nach entnommen sind, auf jeden Fall unter Angabe der Quelle als Entlehnung kenntlich gemacht habe.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Interoperability Building Block: IOP-S (Semantic Interoperability)
    Macedonian Interoperability Building Block: IOP-S (Semantic Interoperability) Bernhard Krabina, Po-Wen Liu, Peter Reichstädter Date: 2016 Version: 2.0 Support to the Civil Service and Public Administration Reform This project is funded by the 1/37 MK 10 IB OT 01 European Union 1 Executive Summary Semantic Interoperability enables systems to combine received information with other information resources and to process it in a meaningful manner. The process for achieving semantic interoperability is steered by an IOP-S Working Group that is recommended to be initiated by the IOP Committee (outlined in IOP-O). Figure 1: Overview of the Macedonian Semantic Interoperability Framework In order to achieve semantic interoperability in Macedonia, a methodology must be set up for specifying, documenting and using Semantic Assets (Task 1, see Figure 1), i.e. highly reusable metadata (e.g. xml schemata, generic data models) and reference data (e.g. code lists, taxonomies, dictionaries, vocabularies) which are used for e-Government system development. A semantic asset specifies for example what metadata about a person, a business, a location or a car, or other entities are stored in Macedonian e-Government systems. In order to raise awareness and facilitate the uptake of the interoperability assets, an Asset Registry and/or an Asset Repository (Task 2) needs to be implemented. An Asset Registry is a central location where asset definitions are stored and maintained in a controlled method. A semantic Asset Repository is an infrastructure where semantic assets can be stored, documented and retrieved. It is the physical place where the semantic assets are stored.
    [Show full text]
  • Libreoffice from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    LibreOffice From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia LibreOffice is the most actively LibreOffice developed [9] free and open source office suite, a project of The Document Foundation. It was forked from OpenOffice.org in 2010, which was an open-sourced version of the earlier StarOffice. The LibreOffice suite comprises programs for word processing, the creation and editing of spreadsheets, slideshows, diagrams and drawings, working with databases, and composing mathematical formulae. It is available in 110 languages. [7] LibreOffice uses the international ISO/IEC standard OpenDocument file format (ODF) as its native format to save documents for all of its applications. LibreOffice 5.1 Start Center LibreOffice also supports the file formats Original author(s) StarDivision of most other major office suites, including Developer(s) The Document Foundation Microsoft Office, through a variety of import/export filters. [10][11] Initial release 25 January 2011 Stable release "Fresh" version : LibreOffice is available for a variety of 5.2.3 (November 3, 2016 [1] ) [±] (https://en.wikipedia.org computing platforms,[5] including Microsoft Windows, macOS (10.8 or /w/index.php?title=Template:Latest_stable_software_release newer), and Linux (including a LibreOffice /LibreOffice&action=edit) Viewer for Android [12] ). It is the default "Still" version : office suite of most popular Linux 5.1.6 (October 27, 2016 [1] ) [±] (https://en.wikipedia.org distributions.[13][14][15][16] /w/index.php?title=Template:Latest_stable_software_release /LibreOffice&action=edit) Between January 2011 (the first stable Preview release release) and October 2011, LibreOffice 5.2.3 RC1 (October 22, 2016 [2] ) [±] (https://en.wikipedia.org was downloaded approximately 7.5 million /w/index.php?title=Template:Latest_preview_software_release times.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Page 1
    0 Contents The ASF at-a-Glance 2 Chairman’s Report 3 President’s Report 5 Treasurer’s Report 6 Financial Statement 7 Fundraising 9 Legal Affairs 13 Infrastructure 15 Security 17 Data Privacy 19 Marketing & Publicity 20 Brand Management 40 Conferences 43 Community Development 45 Diversity & Inclusion 47 Projects and Code 49 Contributions 62 ASF Members 68 Emeritus Members 71 Memorial 72 Contact 73 FY2020 Annual Report Page 1 The ASF at-a-Glance The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) was founded in 1999 with the mission to provide software for the public good. Today ... The Apache Software Foundation is the world’s largest Open Source foundation, stewarding 200M+ lines of code and providing more than $20B+ worth of software to the public at 100% no cost. The ASF’s all-volunteer community grew from 21 original founders overseeing the Apache HTTP Server to 813 individual Members and 206 Project Management Committees who successfully lead 350+ Apache projects and initiatives in collaboration with 7,700+ Committers through the ASF’s meritocratic process known as "The Apache Way". Apache software is integral to nearly every end user computing device, from laptops to tablets to mobile devices across enterprises and mission-critical applications. Apache projects power most of the Internet, manage exabytes of data, execute teraflops of operations, and store billions of objects in virtually every industry. The commercially-friendly and permissive Apache License v2 is an Open Source industry standard, helping launch billion dollar corporations and benefiting countless users worldwide. FY2020 Annual Report Page 2 Chairman’s Report by Roy Fielding The past 12 months have been a banner year for the Foundation, celebrating our 20th anniversary of incorporation and producing two very successful ApacheCon conferences in Las Vegas and Berlin.
    [Show full text]