DOCSLIB.ORG

BURKINA FASO Unité

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MINISTERE DE L’ENERGIE, BURKINA FASO DES MINES ET DES CARRIERES Unité - Progrès - Justice ----------------- ----------------- SOCIETE NATIONALE D’ELECTRICITE DU BURKINA (SONABEL) Téléphone : (+226) 25 30 61 00 PROJET D’APPUI AU SECTEUR DE L’ELECTRICITE (PASEL) NOTICE D’IMPACT ENVIRONNEMENTAL ET SOCIAL DU SOUS PROJET DE CONSTRUCTION D’UN POSTE ELECTRIQUE 90/33 KV A DEDOUGOU DANS LE CADRE DE LA COMPOSANTE 1 DU PROJET D’APPUI AU SECTEUR DE L’ELECTRICITE (PASEL) FINANCEMENT ADDITIONNEL 2 RAPPORT FINAL Mars 2021 10 BP 13722 Ouaga 10 Mobile : +226 25 37 41 03 / 25 37 41 15 /71 94 94 13/76 67 18 15 /70 30 80 40 Email : [email protected] , [email protected] / [email protected] i SOMMAIRE SOMMAIRE .......................................................................................................................................... ii LISTES DES SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS ...................................................................................... iii LISTE DES TABLEAUX ..................................................................................................................... vi LISTE DES FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... vii LISTE DES PHOTOS .......................................................................................................................... vii LISTE DES ANNEXES ....................................................................................................................... vii RESUME NON TECHNIQUE ........................................................................................................... viii NON-TECHNICAL RESUME ........................................................................................................... xxi 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Contexte et justification du sous projet ........................................................................................... 1 1.2. Objectifs de la Notice d’Impact Environnemental et Social ........................................................... 1 1.3. Résultat attendu ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Processus de réalisation de la NIES ................................................................................................ 3 1.5. Méthodologie de l’étude ................................................................................................................. 3 1.6. Structuration du rapport .................................................................................................................. 7 2. DESCRIPTION DES CADRES POLITIQUE, JURIDIQUE, INSTITUTIONNEL ET ADMINISTRATIF ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Cadre politique ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Cadre législatif et réglementaire de gestion environnementale et sociale .................................... 14 2.3. Conventions et accords internationaux ......................................................................................... 26 2.4. Normes fondamentales du travail de l'OIT ................................................................................... 28 2.5. Politiques Opérationnelles et les Directives Environnementales, Sanitaires et sécuritaires de la Banque mondiale .................................................................................................................................. 29 2.6. Cadre institutionnel et administratif de la gestion environnementale et sociale du sous projet ... 31 2.7. Autres acteurs impliqués ............................................................................................................... 35 3. PRESENTATION DU PASEL ET DESCRIPTION DU SOUS PROJET DE CONSTRUCTION DU POSTE DE DEDOUGOU ............................................................................. 37 3.1. Présentation du PASEL ................................................................................................................. 37 3.2. Localisation du sous projet ........................................................................................................... 38 3.3. Présentation du promoteur ............................................................................................................ 39 3.4. Justification du choix du site ......................................................................................................... 39 3.5. Principales composantes du sous projet ........................................................................................ 40 3.6. Activités du sous projet ................................................................................................................. 43 4. DESCRIPTION ET ANALYSE DE L’ETAT INITIAL DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT ................ 48 4.1. Profils biophysique et socio-économique de la zone d’étude ....................................................... 48 5. ANALYSE DES VARIANTES DANS LE CADRE DU SOUS PROJET .................................. 54 6. IDENTIFICATION, ANALYSE ET EVALUATION DES IMPACTS POTENTIELS ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET SOCIAUX .......................................................................................... 56 7. EVALUATION DES RISQUES .................................................................................................. 76 8. PLAN DE GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE ................................................ 92 9. MECANISME DE GESTION DES PLAINTES (MGP) ........................................................... 130 10. MODALITES DE CONSULTATION ET DE PARTICIPATION DU PUBLIC ...................... 135 11. PLAN DE FERMETURE ET REHABILITATION ................................................................... 146 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 148 BIBLIOGRAPHIE ............................................................................................................................. 150 ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................................... 151 ii LISTES DES SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS AEPS : Adduction d’Eau Potable Simplifiée APD : Avant-Projet Détaillé AVO Association aide aux Veuves et Orphelins BC : Bureau de Contrôle BF : Burkina Faso BM : Banque Mondiale BT : Basse Tension CET : Centre d’Enfouissement Technique CGES : Cadre de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale CNSS : Caisse Nationale de Sécurité Sociale COVID-19 : Maladie à Coronavirus 2019 CROSC : Conseil Régional des Organisations de la Société Civile CVD : Conseil Villageois de Développement DEMAC : Direction de l'Exploitation Minière, Artisanale et des Carrières DFSPP : Direction des Formations Sanitaires Publiques et Privées DGA : Direction Générale l’Assainissement DGAHDI : Direction Générale des Aménagements Hydrauliques et du Développement de l’Irrigation DGAT : Direction Générale de l’Administration du Territoire DGB : Direction Générale du Budget DGCT : Direction Générale des Collectivités Territoriales Direction Générale du Foncier, de la Formation et de l’Organisation du Monde DGFFOMR : Rural DGPE : Direction Générale de la Préservation de l’Environnement DGPS : Direction Générale de la Protection Sociale DGSP : Direction Générale de la Santé Publique DGT : Direction Générale du Travail DGTT : Direction Générale des Transports Terrestres DGUTF : Direction Générale de l'Urbanisme et des Travaux Fonciers DEEE Déchets d’Equipements Electriques et Electroniques DID Déchets Industriels Dangereux DLCTE : Direction de la Lutte Contre le Travail des Enfants DNEQ : Département Normalisation, Environnement et Qualité DPAAH : Direction Provinciale de l’Agriculture et des Aménagements Hydro-agricoles DREEVCC : Direction Régionale de l’Environnement, de l’Economie Verte et du Changement Climatique DTMF : Direction du Transport Maritime et Fluvial EAS : Exploitation et Abus Sexuels EIES : Etude d’Impact Environnemental et Social EPI : Equipement de Protection Individuelle FN : Formation Naturelle HS : Hygiène Santé HS : Harcèlement Sexuel IEC : Information, Education et Communication INSD : Institut National des Statistiques et de la Démographie IRA : Infections Respiratoires Aigües IST : Infection Sexuellement Transmissible KV : Kilovolt iii MAAH : Ministère de l’Agriculture et des Aménagements Hydro-agricoles MATDC : Ministère de l’Administration Territoriale, de la Décentralisation et de la Cohésion sociale MDAC Ministère de la Défense nationale et des Anciens Combattants MDC : Mission de Contrôle ME : Ministère de l’Energie MEA : Ministère de l’Eau et de l’Assainissement MEEVCC : Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Economie Verte et du Changement Climatique MFTP : Ministère de la Fonction publique, du Travail et de la Protection sociale MGP : Mécanisme de Gestion des Plaintes MINEFID : Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et du Développement MMC : Ministère des Mines et des Carrières MS : Ministère de la Santé MSec. : Ministère de la Sécurité MST : Maladies Sexuellement Transmissibles MTMS : Ministère des Transports, de la Mobilité urbaine et de la Sécurité routière MUH : Ministère
Recommended publications
  • Sociolinguistic Survey Report for the Marka-Dafin

    Sociolinguistic Survey Report for the Marka-Dafin

    1 SOCIOLINGUISTIC SURVEY REPORT FOR THE MARKA-DAFIN LANGUAGE WRITTEN BY: BYRON AND ANNETTE HARRISON SIL International 2001 2 Contents 0 Introduction and Goals of the Survey 1 General Information 1.1 Language Classification 1.2 Language Location 1.2.1 Description of Location 1.2.2 Map 1.3 Population 1.4 Accessibility and Transport 1.4.1 Roads: Quality and Availability 1.4.2 Public Transport Systems 1.5 Religious Adherence 1.5.1 General Religious History 1.5.2 History of Christian Work in the Area 1.5.3 Language Use Parameters within Church Life 1.5.4 Written Materials in Marka-Dafin 1.5.5 Summary 1.6 Schools/Education 1.6.1 History of Schools in the Area 1.6.2 Types, Sites, and Size 1.6.3 Attendance and Academic Achievement 1.6.4 Existing Literacy Programs 1.6.5 Attitude toward the Vernacular 1.6.6 Summary 1.7 Facilities and Economics 1.7.1 Supply Needs 1.7.2 Medical Needs 1.7.3 Government Facilities in the Area 1.8 Traditional Culture 1.8.1 Historical Notes 1.8.2 Relevant Cultural Aspects 1.8.3 Attitude toward Culture 1.8.4 Summary 1.9 Linguistic Work in the Language Area 1.9.1 Work Accomplished in the Past 1.9.2 Present Work 2 Methodology 2.1 Sampling 2.1.1 Village Sites Chosen for the Jula Sentence Repetition Test 2.1.2 Village Sites for Sociolinguistic Survey 2.2 Lexicostatistic Survey 2.3 Dialect Intelligibility Survey 3 2.4 Questionnaires 2.5 Bilingualism Testing In Jula 3 Dialect Intercomprehension and Lexicostatistical Data 3.1 Perceived Intercomprehension 3.2 Results of the Recorded Text Tests 3.3 Lexicostatistical Analysis 3.4
  • Genderanalysisreport

    Genderanalysisreport

    GENDER ANALYSIS REPORT SELEVER PROJECT BURKINA FASO Prepared by Sita Zougouri and Emily Cook-Lundgren October 2016 SELEVER Gender Analysis October 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Major Findings and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 1 2 Background and Objectives ........................................................................................................3 2.1 Key Questions and Themes .............................................................................................................. 4 3 Methodology .............................................................................................................................5 3.1 Desk Review ..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Geographic Sampling ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Research Participant Selection ........................................................................................................ 7 3.4 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................. 8 3.4.1 Focus Group Discussions ............................................................................................................
  • Burkina Faso) and Has Been Incorporated Into This Report

    Burkina Faso) and Has Been Incorporated Into This Report

    and their buffer zones, factors affecting the serial property, conservation, protection and management. Ancient ferrous metallurgy sites Additional information was received on 9 November 2018, (Burkina Faso) and has been incorporated into this report. No 1602 An Interim report was provided to the State Party in December 2018, summing up the questions identified by the ICOMOS World Heritage Panel. Further information was requested in the Interim report about documentation, criterion (vi), conservation, management and tourism. Official name as proposed by the State Party Ancient ferrous metallurgy sites Additional information was received from the State Party on 27 February 2019 and has been incorporated into the Location relevant sections of this evaluation report. Commune of Kaya, Sanmatenga province Commune of Zitenga, Oubritenga province Date of ICOMOS approval of this report Commune of Tougo, Zondoma province 13 March 2019 Commune of Békuy, Tuy province Commune of Douroula, Mouhoun province Burkina Faso 2 Description of the property Brief description The five component parts of this serial nomination Description and history (Tiwêga, Yamané, Kindibo, Békuy, Douroula) include The five component parts of this serial nomination some fifteen furnaces still standing, several furnace (Tiwêga, Yamané, Kindibo, Békuy, Douroula) include bases, assemblages of slag, mines and some traces of some fifteen furnaces still standing, several furnace dwellings. From the first millennium BCE, when ferrous bases, assemblages of slag, mines and some traces of metallurgy first appeared, there is tangible evidence of its dwellings. importance across the whole of present-day Burkina Faso. Although iron smelting is no longer practised today, The site of Tiwêga consists of three induced draft the blacksmiths in nearby villages still play an important furnaces that are still standing, and fragments of slag and role by supplying and maintaining the tools and tuyères.
  • Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics

    Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Stroh, Alexander Working Paper The Power of Proximity: Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics GIGA Working Papers, No. 96 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Stroh, Alexander (2009) : The Power of Proximity: Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics, GIGA Working Papers, No. 96, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47766 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences),
  • Évaluation Finale, Du Projet

    Évaluation Finale, Du Projet

    Burkina Faso --------------------- Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development --------------- Permanent Secretary of the National Council for Environment and Sustainable Development (SP/CNEDD) --------------- Coordination nationale des projets du NAPA --------------- FINAL REVIEW OF «STRENGTHENING ADAPTATION CAPACITIES AND REDUCING THE VULNERABILITY TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN BURKINA FASO» PROJECT Final Evaluation Report July 2014 Consultants : NIENTA Ibrahim, agro-economist, International Consultant COULIBALY Ngra zan, socio-economist, National Consultant ii NAPA-BKF-UNDP-GEF project – Terminal Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS FRONT PAGE ......................................................................................................................... iii ACCRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... iv GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................ vi SYNTHESIS NOTE ................................................................................................................. viii Table 1 : Project summary ................................................................................................ viii 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 18 1.1. Objective of the evaluation .................................................................................. 18 1.2. Scope of application
  • Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics

    Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Stroh, Alexander Working Paper The Power of Proximity: Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics GIGA Working Papers, No. 96 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Stroh, Alexander (2009) : The Power of Proximity: Strategic Decisions in African Party Politics, GIGA Working Papers, No. 96, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47766 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences),
  • Page 1 of 9 Burkina Faso

    Page 1 of 9 Burkina Faso

    Burkina Faso Page 1 of 9 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Burkina Faso Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Burkina Faso is a parliamentary republic with a population of approximately 12.2 million. On November 13, President Blaise Compaore was reelected to a third term with 80 percent of the vote. Observers considered the election free, despite minor irregularities, but not entirely fair due to the resource advantage held by the president. President Compaore, assisted by members of his party, the Congress for Democracy and Progress (CDP), continued to dominate the government. The civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The government's human rights record remained poor, but there were improvements in some areas. Poverty, unemployment, a weak infrastructure, and drought exacerbated some of the following human rights problems: security force use of excessive force against civilians, criminal suspects, and detainees, which resulted in deaths and injuries societal violence abuse of prisoners and harsh prison conditions official impunity arbitrary arrest and detention occasional restrictions on freedom of the press and assembly, including the forcible dispersion of demonstrations violence and discrimination against women and children, including female genital mutilation (FGM) trafficking in persons, including children discrimination against persons with disabilities child labor During the year the government continued significant efforts to combat FGM and trafficking in persons. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were no known politically motivated killings by the government or its agents; however, security forces were responsible for the deaths of civilians, criminal suspects, and detainees.
  • Burkina Faso Page 1 of 11

    Burkina Faso Page 1 of 11

    Burkina Faso Page 1 of 11 Burkina Faso Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 11, 2008 Burkina Faso is a parliamentary republic with a population of 14.25 million. In 2005 President Blaise Compaore was reelected to a third term with 80 percent of the vote. Observers considered the election to have been generally free, despite minor irregularities, but not entirely fair due to the ruling party's control of official resources. The president, assisted by members of his party, the Congress for Democracy and Progress (CDP), continued to dominate the government. The CDP won a majority in the May 6 legislative elections, which election observers declared to be free and orderly except in four cities where irregularities and fraud involving voters' identification cards were noted. While civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces, there were instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently. The government's human rights record remained mixed. The following human rights problems were reported: security force use of excessive force against civilians, criminal suspects, and detainees, resulting in injuries; arbitrary arrest and detention; abuse of prisoners and harsh prison conditions; official impunity; occasional restrictions on freedom of the press and freedom of assembly; corruption; violence and discrimination against women and children, including female genital mutilation (FGM); trafficking in persons, including children; discrimination against persons with disabilities; and child labor. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings during the year.
  • Burkina Faso Natural Resources Management Action Plan

    Burkina Faso Natural Resources Management Action Plan

    FW - ttO Burkina Faso Natural Resources Management Action Plan Harvel Sebastian, Team Leader John Heermans Anthony Johnson Mike McGahuey Robert Winterbottom January 1991 This report was prepared fbr the U.S. Agency for International Development under contract number PDC-5317-1-43-8127-00 DAT 7250 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 200. Bethesda, Maryland 20814 i PREFACE This report was prepared by a team of five. Chapters One and Two were written by John Heermans and Robert Winterbottom, Chapter Three by Mike McGahuey, Chapter Four by Anthony Johnson, and Chapter Five and the Executive Summary by the team leader, Harvel Sebastian. The field work was done during October and November 1990. i1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ewg EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION I OBJECTIVE I TARGET AREA I ASSUMPONS 1 CHAPTER TWO FORESTRY AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION 3 PROJECT GOALS AND PURPOSE 3 rroject Goals 3 Project Purpose 3 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION AND STRATEGY 4 Project Justification 4 Project Strategy 5 TRAINING COMPONENT 7 Training for Paysans 8 Training for Gov.rnment Technicians 8 Training Materials and Institutions 8 PROPOSED TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 9 Long Term 9 Short Term 9 FORESTRY: BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM ANALYSIS 9 Lack of Natural Forest Managemeut 9 Experience of Nazinon and Nazinga 10 Major Issues 10 LIVESTOCK SECTOR: BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM ANALYSIS 12 Historical Perspective 12 COMMENTS ON WORLD BANK/UNDP/ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR BURKINA FASO 16 Emphasis Remains on Shift from Biomass to "Modern" Fuels 16 Woodstoves 18 Management of Degraded
  • The Archaeology of Kirikongo, Burkina Faso

    The Archaeology of Kirikongo, Burkina Faso

    REINVENTING EQUALITY: THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIRIKONGO, BURKINA FASO by Stephen A. Dueppen A dissertation submitted in partial fufillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Kent V. Flannery, Chair Professor Raymond A. Silverman Professor Carla M. Sinopoli Professor John D. Speth Professor Henry T. Wright © Stephen Dueppen All rights reserved 2008 To my parents, Kenneth and Mary Ann, and to Daphne ii Acknowledgements This project received generous financial support from numerous sources. The University of Michigan’s Center for Afro-American and African Studies Africa Initiative Fund and Museum of Anthropology Griffin Fund provided support for the 2004 season, and the 2006 field season was funded by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant. The Douglas Bridges Educational Fund enabled AMS dating. Faunal analyses were generously supported by a Smithsonian Pre-Doctoral Fellowship at the National Museum of Natural History (Archaeobiology). In Burkina Faso, Dr. Lassina Koté at the University of Ouagadougou generously sponsored this project and went out of his way to facilitate all aspects of the fieldwork. He has been a valued mentor over the past decade. Drs.Vincent Sedogo and Eloi Bambara at the CNRST and Dr. Oumarou Nao at the Ministry of Culture were instrumental in issuing the appropriate permits, and Drs. Kiethega and Millogo (University of Ougadougou) were gracious in their support of this project. Thanks are also due to Drissa Koté, Abdoulaye Koita, Amadou Koté, Miriam Koté, Aminata Koté, and the rest of the village of Douroula, for their hospitality. Gratitude is also owed to Léonce Ki (University of Ouagadougou) for his participation in fieldwork, Haruna Sankara of Kirikongo for storage of field tools, and Bakary Soiré for transportation.