Venus Flytrap Rarely Traps Its Pollinators

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Venus Flytrap Rarely Traps Its Pollinators vol. 191, no. 4 the american naturalist april 2018 Natural History Note Venus Flytrap Rarely Traps Its Pollinators Elsa Youngsteadt,1,* Rebecca E. Irwin,2 Alison Fowler,2 Matthew A. Bertone,1 Sara June Giacomini,2 Michael Kunz,3 Dale Suiter,4 and Clyde E. Sorenson1 1. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695; 2. Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695; 3. North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; 4. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Submitted August 14, 2017; Accepted October 10, 2017; Electronically published February 5, 2018 Online enhancements: appendix table. Dryad data: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p8s64. fl abstract: Because carnivorous plants rely on arthropods as polli- pollinator-prey con ict (Juniper et al. 1989; Zamora 1999; nators and prey, they risk consuming would-be mutualists. We exam- Jürgens et al. 2012). For example, recent experiments suggest ined this potential conflict in the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula), that the red color of sundew (Drosera) traps reduces pollina- whose pollinators were previously unknown. Diverse arthropods from tor bycatch but at the expense of total prey capture (Jürgens two classes and nine orders visited flowers; 56% of visitors carried et al. 2015). With few exceptions, however, the extent and D. muscipula pollen, often mixed with pollen of coflowering species. strength of pollinator-prey conflict is poorly quantified (but Within this diverse, generalized community, certain bee and beetle see Zamora 1999; Murza et al. 2006; El-Sayed et al. 2016). species appear to be the most important pollinators, on the basis of their abundance, pollen load size, and pollen fidelity. Dionaea musci- The pollination systems of most carnivorous species are pula prey spanned four invertebrate classes and 11 orders; spiders, poorly documented, while the composition of their prey is of- beetles, and ants were most common. At the family and species levels, ten reported at coarse taxonomic resolution (Jürgens et al. few taxa were shared between traps and flowers, yielding a near-zero 2012). value of niche overlap for these potentially competing structures. Spa- Remarkably, Venus flytrap, Dionaea muscipula J. Ellis tial separation of traps and flowers may contribute to partitioning the (Droseraceae), is among the species whose pollinators have invertebrate community between nutritional and reproductive func- never been reported. Of more than 600 species of carnivo- tions in D. muscipula. rous plants in the world, D. muscipula is the only terrestrial Keywords: Venus flytrap, Dionaea muscipula, pollination ecology, species with an active snap trap (Ellison and Gotelli 2009). pollinator-prey conflict, niche overlap. Since D. muscipula came to the attention of Victorian nat- uralists in the 1800s, the rapid movement of its traps has prompted cultural fascination and extensive physiological Introduction study (e.g., Darwin 1875; Forterre et al. 2005; Chase et al. Plants typically interact with multiple species of animals 2009). The species is now cultivated in many countries for and exhibit ecological and evolutionary responses to the con- research, education, and horticultural trade, but its native flicting pressures imposed by mutualists (such as pollina- range is restricted to a small area of North Carolina and tors) and antagonists (such as herbivores; e.g., Strauss and South Carolina, where it is threatened by habitat loss, fire Irwin 2004; Sun et al. 2016). Carnivorous plants present a suppression, and poaching. The International Union for special case of potentially conflicting pressures. Because many Conservation of Nature and the North Carolina Plant Con- carnivorous plants rely on arthropods as pollinators and prey, servation Program list the species as vulnerable, and it has they risk consuming their would-be mutualists (Givnish 1989; been petitioned for listing under the US Endangered Species Ellison and Gotelli 2001). They may therefore face trade-offs Act (Schnell et al. 2000; Robinson and Finnegan 2016; between pollination services and nutrient intake, known as Waller et al. 2016). Despite the conservation status and unique trap biology of D. muscipula, its pollination ecology is relatively un- * Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]. known. From mid-May to early July, it produces white, ORCIDs: Youngsteadt, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-9674; Fowler, http:// saucer-shaped flowers, approximately 2 cm in diameter, in orcid.org/0000-0002-9263-2253; Suiter, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-7227; – Sorenson, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-7272. a cymous raceme atop a scape 15 35 cm long (Smith 1929; Roberts and Oosting 1958). Roberts and Oosting (1958, Am. Nat. 2018. Vol. 191, pp. 000–000. q 2018 by The University of Chicago. 0003-0147/2018/19104-57880$15.00. All rights reserved. p. 202) reported that it is self-infertile and that pollination DOI: 10.1086/696124 is “presumably . entomophilous, apparently by various This content downloaded from 152.007.224.009 on February 05, 2018 12:03:04 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). 000 The American Naturalist beetles, small flies, and possibly spiders,” although they did did not damage plants. We transferred prey into individual not present data or more specific taxonomic determina- vials of 70% ethanol. tions. Prey have been better quantified; spiders, ants, and We identified arthropods from flowers and traps to the beetles compose the largest share (Ellison and Gotelli 2009; lowest taxonomic level possible; target resolution was fam- Hutchens and Luken 2015). ily for spiders and Orthoptera (most of which were imma- The goal of this study was to document the potentially ture or poorly preserved in traps) and species/morphospe- conflicting insect interactions of D. muscipula flowers and cies for other insects. We used standard references (e.g., traps to inform further study of its evolutionary ecology Stehr 1987; Arnett et al. 2002 and references therein; Gibbs and conservation management. Specifically, we asked the 2011) and comparison to reference material in the North following: (1) Which invertebrate species visit D. muscipula Carolina State University Insect Museum, where voucher flowers? (2) Which of these are the most important poten- specimens will be deposited. tial pollinators? (3) To what extent do flowers and traps in- teract with the same suite of invertebrates? Pollen Analysis To identify potential pollinators of D. muscipula—defined Methods here as taxa that carry D. muscipula pollen on their bodies— fl Study System we sampled and stained pollen from each ower visitor by swabbing all surfaces of its body with a small piece of fuchsin Dionaea muscipula is native only to southeastern North gel (Kearns and Inouye 1993). Hereafter, we refer to the pol- Carolina and northeastern South Carolina, where it grows len swabbed off the insects as the pollen load, and we as- in wet longleaf (Pinus palustris) and pond pine (Pinus sero- sumed that pollen on the insect’s body was available for tina) savannas and the ecotone between evergreen shrub transfer to another plant. We mounted the pollen by melting bogs and dry pine stands (Luken 2005; Schafale 2012). the jelly on a microscope slide and sealing it with a coverslip. fi These habitats have frequent re return intervals and wa- Similarly, we prepared slides of reference pollen from an- terlogged, low-nutrient soils. Because of these conditions, thers and pollinia. We assessed all flower visitor slides under D. muscipula captures prey to satisfy nutrient requirements a compound microscope for the presence or absence of and co-occurs with a diverse community of other carnivo- D. muscipula pollen and heterospecific pollen by compari- rous plants (Ellison and Gotelli 2001). This habitat is well son to the reference pollen. Dionaea muscipula pollen is represented in Pender County, North Carolina, where our large (∼100 µm diameter) and easily distinguished from that study took place. of coflowering species. For the subset of flower visitors that carried D. muscipula pollen, we subjected pollen slides from the 10 most abun- Sampling dant taxa to more detailed analysis. We counted a sample We sampled D. muscipula flower visitors and prey from of pollen grains from up to 10 randomly selected slides per three sites, separated by 2.5–3.7 km. Each site comprised taxon (or all available slides if fewer than 10 individuals car- hundreds to thousands of flowering stems. We sampled on ried pollen). At #200 magnification, we counted the num- four dates in 2016 during peak D. muscipula bloom (May 17, ber of grains of D. muscipula pollen and heterospecific pollen May 24, June 2, and June 10). We collected flower visitors in five fields of view per slide (one in the center of the stained between 1000 and 1820 hours during fair weather for a total sample and four peripheral fields of view from the center of 29.5 person-hours of collecting (68–670 person-minutes sampling point). The final sample count was the sum of per site each time a site was visited). During sampling, we the number of pollen grains in all five fields of view. searched the site and collected all arthropods observed on anthers, stigmas, and flower petals. Arthropods were collected Data Analysis directly into individual vials or netted and transferred into vials, and then they were sacrificed and transported on dry All analyses were conducted using R v.3.3.1 within R studio ice. We regularly washed nets with 70% ethanol to avoid pol- v.1.0.136 (R Development Core Team 2013; RStudio Team len contamination. To develop a local pollen library, we re- 2015). To estimate the number of taxa that might be de- moved a sample of anthers (or pollinia) from D. muscipula tected at flowers and traps with further sampling, we com- and all nearby flowering species and transported them in puted the Chao1 asymptotic richness estimator in the iNEXT vials on dry ice.
Recommended publications
  • Foraging Modes of Carnivorous Plants Aaron M
    Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22244662-20191066 Foraging modes of carnivorous plants Aaron M. Ellison* Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, Massachusetts, 01366, USA Abstract Carnivorous plants are pure sit-and-wait predators: they remain rooted to a single location and depend on the abundance and movement of their prey to obtain nutrients required for growth and reproduction. Yet carnivorous plants exhibit phenotypically plastic responses to prey availability that parallel those of non-carnivorous plants to changes in light levels or soil-nutrient concentrations. The latter have been considered to be foraging behaviors, but the former have not. Here, I review aspects of foraging theory that can be profitably applied to carnivorous plants considered as sit-and-wait predators. A discussion of different strategies by which carnivorous plants attract, capture, kill, and digest prey, and subsequently acquire nutrients from them suggests that optimal foraging theory can be applied to carnivorous plants as easily as it has been applied to animals. Carnivorous plants can vary their production, placement, and types of traps; switch between capturing nutrients from leaf-derived traps and roots; temporarily activate traps in response to external cues; or cease trap production altogether. Future research on foraging strategies by carnivorous plants will yield new insights into the physiology and ecology of what Darwin called “the most wonderful plants in the world”. At the same time, inclusion of carnivorous plants into models of animal foraging behavior could lead to the development of a more general and taxonomically inclusive foraging theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Prescribed Fire and Fire Surrogates on Pollinators and Saproxylic Beetles in North Carolina and Alabama
    EFFECTS OF PRESCRIBED FIRE AND FIRE SURROGATES ON POLLINATORS AND SAPROXYLIC BEETLES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND ALABAMA by JOSHUA W. CAMPBELL (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT Pollinating and saproxylic insects are two groups of forest insects that are considered to be extremely vital for forest health. These insects maintain and enhance plant diversity, but also help recycle nutrients back into the soil. Forest management practices (prescribed burns, thinnings, herbicide use) are commonly used methods to limit fuel build up within forests. However, their effects on pollinating and saproxylic insects are poorly understood. We collected pollinating and saproxylic insect from North Carolina and Alabama from 2002-2004 among different treatment plots. In North Carolina, we captured 7921 floral visitors from four orders and 21 families. Hymenoptera was the most abundant and diverse order, with Halictidae being the most abundant family. The majority of floral visitors were captured in the mechanical plus burn treatments, while lower numbers were caught on the mechanical only treatments, burn only treatments and control treatments. Overall species richness was also higher on mechanical plus burn treatments compared to other treatments. Total pollinator abundance was correlated with decreased tree basal area (r2=0.58) and increased percent herbaceous plant cover (r2=0.71). We captured 37,191 saproxylic Coleoptera in North Carolina, comprising 20 families and 122 species. Overall, species richness and total abundance of Coleoptera were not significantly different among treatments. However, total numbers of many key families, such as Scolytidae, Curculionidae, Cerambycidae, and Buprestidae, have higher total numbers in treated plots compared to untreated controls and several families (Elateridae, Cleridae, Trogositidae, Scolytidae) showed significant differences (p≤0.05) in abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/morphologytaxono12haye ' / ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Volume XII PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS *, URBANA, ILLINOIS I EDITORIAL COMMITTEE John Theodore Buchholz Fred Wilbur Tanner Charles Zeleny, Chairman S70.S~ XLL '• / IL cop TABLE OF CONTENTS Nos. Pages 1. Morphological Studies of the Genus Cercospora. By Wilhelm Gerhard Solheim 1 2. Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea. By William Patrick Hayes 85 3. Sawflies of the Sub-family Dolerinae of America North of Mexico. By Herbert H. Ross 205 4. A Study of Fresh-water Plankton Communities. By Samuel Eddy 321 LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Vol. XII April, 1929 No. 2 Editorial Committee Stephen Alfred Forbes Fred Wilbur Tanner Henry Baldwin Ward Published by the University of Illinois under the auspices of the graduate school Distributed June 18. 1930 MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND BIOLOGY OF LARVAL SCARABAEOIDEA WITH FIFTEEN PLATES BY WILLIAM PATRICK HAYES Associate Professor of Entomology in the University of Illinois Contribution No. 137 from the Entomological Laboratories of the University of Illinois . T U .V- TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Introduction Q Economic importance Historical review 11 Taxonomic literature 12 Biological and ecological literature Materials and methods 1%i Acknowledgments Morphology ]* 1 ' The head and its appendages Antennae. 18 Clypeus and labrum ™ 22 EpipharynxEpipharyru Mandibles. Maxillae 37 Hypopharynx <w Labium 40 Thorax and abdomen 40 Segmentation « 41 Setation Radula 41 42 Legs £ Spiracles 43 Anal orifice 44 Organs of stridulation 47 Postembryonic development and biology of the Scarabaeidae Eggs f*' Oviposition preferences 48 Description and length of egg stage 48 Egg burster and hatching Larval development Molting 50 Postembryonic changes ^4 54 Food habits 58 Relative abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Polistes (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), with a Phylogenetic Consideration of Hamilton’S Haplodiploidy Hypothesis
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 43: 390–406 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 29 December 2006 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2006 Systematics of Polistes (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), with a phylogenetic consideration of Hamilton’s haplodiploidy hypothesis Kurt M. Pickett*, James M. Carpenter & Ward C. Wheeler Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10023, USA * Current address: Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Room 120A Marsh Life Science Building, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA Received 30 Nov. 2005, revised version received 21 Nov. 2006, accepted 4 May 2006 Pickett, K. M., Carpenter, J. M. & Wheeler, W. C. 2006: Systematics of Polistes (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), with a phylogenetic consideration of Hamilton’s haplodiploidy hypothesis. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 43: 390–406. A review of previously published cladistic analyses of Polistes is presented. The two most recent analyses of Polistes are shown to be largely consistent phylogenetically. Although the taxonomy implied by each differs, this difference is shown to be mostly due to taxon sampling. After the review, a phylogenetic analysis of Polistes — the most data-rich yet undertaken — is presented. The analysis includes new data and the data from previously published analyses. The differing conclusions of the previous studies are discussed in light of the new analysis. After discussing the status of subge- neric taxonomy in Polistes, the new phylogeny is used to test an important hypothesis regarding the origin of social behavior: the haplodiploidy hypothesis of Hamilton. Prior phylogenetic analyses so while these studies achieved their goal, with within Polistes resolutions leading to rejection of Emery’s Rule, they had little to say about broader phylogenetic Cladistic analysis of species-level relationships patterns within the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter V47 N2 June 2018
    New Cultivars Keywords: Pinguicula ‘Riva’, Drosera binata ‘Ghost’, Nepenthes ampullaria ‘Black Widow’, Nepenthes ampullaria ‘Caramel Candy Stripe’, Nepenthes ampullaria ‘Lime Delight’, Nepenthes ampullaria ‘Chocolate Delight’, Nepenthes ampullaria ‘Cherry Delight’, Nepenthes ampullaria ‘Bronze Delight’. Pinguicula ‘Riva’ Submitted: 22 February 2018 The parents of Pinguicula ‘Riva’ (Fig. 1) are P. agnata (with scented flowers) × P. gigantea (to the best of my knowledge; the second parent may have been a P. gigantea × P. emarginata). This cross was done and the resulting seed germinated in late 2013 by me in San Francisco, California. This particular plant made its specialness apparent after about 2 years of growth under lights when it began flowering. The flower is approximately 2 cm wide by 2.5 cm long and is white with a bright yellow center which is surrounded by a flaring purple ring. The petals are 1 cm long, 7-9 mm wide, slightly ruffled, and the top 2 petals have irregular slightly serrated upper margins. The spur is 12 mm long, green and straight. The flower stalk is 18-20 cm long. And, the flower is scented, quite heavily in warmer conditions. The flower does not produce pollen or seed so it is sterile. The leaves of the plant are nice as well, ranging from 4-5.5 cm long and about 3 cm wide. The leaf shape is oblong egg-shaped with the rounded end distal from the central growth point. The color of the leaves ranges from pale green with burgundy tinting and margins to muted burgundy with green undertones. The margins of the leaf are slightly upturned.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of the Boreal Bog Species Drosera Rotundifolia (Droseraceae) from the Philippines, and a Key to the Philippine Sundews
    Blumea 61, 2016: 24–28 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651916X691330 The first record of the boreal bog species Drosera rotundifolia (Droseraceae) from the Philippines, and a key to the Philippine sundews F.P. Coritico1, A. Fleischmann2 Key words Abstract Drosera rotundifolia, a species of the temperate Northern Hemisphere with a disjunct occurrence in high montane West Papua, has been discovered in a highland peat bog on Mt Limbawon, Pantaron Range, Bukidnon carnivorous plants on the island of Mindanao, Philippines, which mediates to the only other known tropical, Southern Hemisphere Drosera location in New Guinea and the closest known northern populations in southern Japan and south-eastern China. Droseraceae A dichotomous key to the seven Drosera species of the Philippines is given, and distribution maps are provided. Malesia Mindanao Published on 15 March 2016 Northern Hemisphere - Tropics disjunction Philippines INTRODUCTION Drosera rotundifolia L. (the generic type) is a temperate, winter dormant species that is widespread in the Northern The Philippines are rich in carnivorous plants, with about 47 Hemisphere, from Pacific North America across large parts of species known from the islands, most of which belong to the northern America and Europe to Siberia and the Kamchatka pitcher plant genus Nepenthes L. This genus has more than 30 Peninsula, South Korea and Japan. It is the Drosera spe- species in the Philippines, all except Nepenthes mirabilis (Lour.) cies covering the largest range, spanning the entire Northern Druce endemic to the country. Most species occur on Mindanao Hemisphere from 180° Western Longitude to about 180° East, and Palawan, while several are confined to a single highland however, not forming a continuous circumboreal range (Diels or even mountain peak (Robinson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Bobwhite Quail Brood Habitat Management
    National Quail Symposium Proceedings Volume 1 Article 13 1972 Insects and Bobwhite Quail Brood Habitat Management George A. Hurst Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/nqsp Recommended Citation Hurst, George A. (1972) "Insects and Bobwhite Quail Brood Habitat Management," National Quail Symposium Proceedings: Vol. 1 , Article 13. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/nqsp/vol1/iss1/13 This Technical Session I: Problems and Methods in Bobwhite Ecology is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in National Quail Symposium Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/nqsp. I ! Hurst: Insects and Bobwhite Quail Brood Habitat Management I 65 I ! I 15. Stoddard, Herbert L. 1931. The bobwhite quail: its habits, pre­ servation and increase. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York. 559 p. ,I 16. Stoddard, Herbert L., and Ed. V. Komarek. 1941. The carrying capacity of Southeastern quail lands. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. I i Con£. 6:149-155. l I INSECTS AND BOBWHITE QUAIL BROOD HABITAT MANAGEMENT I George A. Hurst, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Miss. Recipient of the "Wendell Bever" award presented by the Okla­ homa Wildlife Federation to the best paper of the Symposium. The award was in memorium to the late Wendell Bever, former Director of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and Regional Representative of the National Wildlife Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Carnivorous Plant Lineage (Triantha) with a Unique Sticky-Inflorescence Trap
    A new carnivorous plant lineage (Triantha) with a unique sticky-inflorescence trap Qianshi Lina,b,1, Cécile Anéc,d, Thomas J. Givnishc, and Sean W. Grahama,b aDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; bUBC Botanical Garden, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; cDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706; and dDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison WI 53706 Edited by Elizabeth A. Kellogg, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, and approved June 5, 2021 (received for review October 30, 2020) Carnivorous plants consume animals for mineral nutrients that and in wetlands, including bogs, marly shorelines, and calcareous enhance growth and reproduction in nutrient-poor environments. spring-fed fens. In bogs, T. occidentalis is commonly found with Here, we report that Triantha occidentalis (Tofieldiaceae) represents recognized carnivorous plants such as Drosera rotundifolia a previously overlooked carnivorous lineage that captures insects on (Droseraceae) and Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae). During sticky inflorescences. Field experiments, isotopic data, and mixing the summer flowering season, T. occidentalis produces leafless models demonstrate significant N transfer from prey to Triantha, erect flowering stems up to 80 cm tall (12). These scapes have with an estimated 64% of leaf N obtained from prey capture in sticky glandular hairs, especially on their upper portions, a feature previous years, comparable to levels inferred for the cooccurring distinguishing Triantha from other genera of Tofieldiaceae round-leaved sundew, a recognized carnivore. N obtained via carnivory (Fig. 1). Small insects are often found trapped by these hairs; is exported from the inflorescence and developing fruits and may herbarium specimens are frequently covered in insects (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Darwin's Hypothesis About The
    vol. 193, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2019 Natural History Note Testing Darwin’s Hypothesis about the Wonderful Venus Flytrap: Marginal Spikes Form a “Horrid q1 Prison” for Moderate-Sized Insect Prey Alexander L. Davis,1 Matthew H. Babb,1 Matthew C. Lowe,1 Adam T. Yeh,1 Brandon T. Lee,1 and Christopher H. Martin1,2,* 1. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; 2. Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 Submitted May 8, 2018; Accepted September 24, 2018; Electronically published Month XX, 2018 Dryad data: https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h8401kn. abstract: Botanical carnivory is a novel feeding strategy associated providing new ecological opportunities (Wainwright et al. with numerous physiological and morphological adaptations. How- 2012; Maia et al. 2013; Martin and Wainwright 2013; Stroud ever, the benefits of these novel carnivorous traits are rarely tested. and Losos 2016). Despite the importance of these traits, our We used field observations, lab experiments, and a seminatural ex- understanding of the adaptive value of novel structures is of- periment to test prey capture function of the marginal spikes on snap ten assumed and rarely directly tested. Frequently, this is be- traps of the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula). Our field and labora- cause it is difficult or impossible to manipulate the trait with- fi tory results suggested inef cient capture success: fewer than one in four out impairing organismal function in an unintended way; prey encounters led to prey capture. Removing the marginal spikes de- creased the rate of prey capture success for moderate-sized cricket prey however, many carnivorous plant traits do not present this by 90%, but this effect disappeared for larger prey.
    [Show full text]
  • KEYS Tú the ETHIOPIAJ.'F TACHINIDAE-III MACQUARTIINAE by the Late F
    313 KEYS Tú THE ETHIOPIAJ.'f TACHINIDAE-III MACQUARTIINAE BY The late F. 1. VAN ENIDEN Commonwealth Institute of Entomology (Accepted 12th May, 1959) (With 11 figures in the text) CüNTENTS , Page Introduction 313 Abhreviations 314 Deñnition of the subfamily Macquartiinae 315 Biology of tha Ethiopian Macquartiinae 315 Key ta the tribes of Ethiopian Macquartiinae 317 Key ta tbe sub-tribes of Echinornyini 320 l. :Macqaartiini 320 2. Wagneriini 332 3. Campyiochaetini 350 4. Helocerini 353 5. Nemoraeini 358 6. Acemyini 368 7. Gennariini 371 8. Thelairini 372 9. Minthoini 377 10. Leskiini 384 11. Echinornyini 402 a. Ernestiina 402 b. Linnaernyina. 407 c. Echinomyina 467 References 486 [The present report was completed by DI' van Ernden with the exception of Olle descrip­ tion, of the figures (to which, however, he had made reference in the appropriate places) and of the section dealing with the biology of the group. The biological data have kindly been summarised by DI' S. V. Peris, of the Instituto de Edafología, Madrid, and the bibliographical references at the end of the paper were provided to support this parto It had been van Emden's intention to inelude a paragraph of thanks in the íntro• duction. This was not completed, but acknowledgments of help received are given at varíous places in the text, and on his behalí thanks are bere tendered to the authoritie" of the British Museum for the facilities which they have so kindly afforded. The present annotator is responsible fol' the deseription of J.l1arshallornyia and its single species, for the text figures and for following the original orthography of the generie names Acemya, Linnaemya and Echinornya.
    [Show full text]