Seasonality and Human Mobility Along the Georgia Bight

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seasonality and Human Mobility Along the Georgia Bight SEASONALITY AND HUMAN MOBILITY ALONG THE GEORGIA BIGHT ELIZABETH J. REITZ, IRVY R. QUITMYER, AND DAVID HURST THOMAS EDITORS AND CONTRIBUTORS American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers, Number 97 Scientific Publications of the American Museum of Natural History American Museum Novitates Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History Publications Committee Robert S. Voss, Chair Board of Editors Jin Meng, Paleontology Lorenzo Prendini, Invertebrate Zoology Robert S. Voss, Vertebrate Zoology Peter M. Whiteley, Anthropology Managing Editor Mary Knight Submission procedures can be found at http://research.amnh.org/scipubs All issues of Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History are available on the web from http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace Order printed copies from http://www.amnhshop.com or via standard mail from American Museum of Natural History—Scientific Publications, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024 ∞ This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (permanence of paper). 2012 SEASONALITY AND HUMAN MOBILITY ALONG THE GEORGIA BIGHT 1 SEASONALITY AND HUMAN MOBILITY ALONG THE GEORGIA BIGHT ELIZABETH J. REITZ, IRVY R. QUITMYER, AND DAVID HURST THOMAS EDITORS AND CONTRIBUTORS WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY C. Fred T. Andrus, Sarah G. Bergh, Nicole R. Cannarozzi, Gwendolyn D. Carroll, Carol E. Colaninno, Brendan J. Culleton, Chester B. DEPratter, Kandace D. Hollenbach, Douglas S. Jones, Deborah Ann Keene, Douglas J. Kennett, Charles W. Lambert, J.W. Moak, Bruce M. Saul, C. Margaret Scarry, Gregory A. Waselkov, AND Elizabeth S. Wing Proceedings of the Fifth Caldwell Conference St. Catherines Island, Georgia May 14–16, 2010 ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 97, 236 pages, 80 figures, 30 tables Issued March 6, 2012 Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 2012 ISSN 0065-9452 2 ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 97 2012 SEASONALITY AND HUMAN MOBILITY ALONG THE GEORGIA BIGHT 3 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Participants in the Fifth Caldwell Conference ..................................................................................... 11 Preface. ELIZABETH J. REITZ, Irvy R. QUITMYER, AND David HURST THOMAS ......................................... 13 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 1. Seasonality and mobility on the Georgia Bight: why should we care? David HURST THOMAS ...................................................................................................................... 19 What’s the “Guale problem”? ......................................................................................................... 19 Conflicting views ........................................................................................................................ 19 Competing hypotheses and logical consequences ...................................................................... 20 Archaeology and the Guale problem .............................................................................................. 21 Developing multiscalar chronologies ............................................................................................. 23 The St. Catherines Island ceramic chronology: reading the hour hand....................................... 23 Radiocarbon dating: reading the minute hand ............................................................................ 23 Site seasonality: reading the second hand ................................................................................... 25 Seasonality and the Guale problem ............................................................................................ 27 But did the Jesuits get it wrong? .................................................................................................... 28 Some conclusions and implications ............................................................................................... 29 The St. Catherines Island research design .................................................................................. 31 Potential problems with proxy populations ................................................................................ 33 Chapter 2. A Bayesian chronological framework for determining site seasonality and contemporaneity. DOUGLAS J. KENNETT AND BRENDAN J. Culleton ......................................... 37 Bayesian essentials ......................................................................................................................... 37 Building site chronologies .............................................................................................................. 38 Trimming confidence intervals ....................................................................................................... 39 Toward building a Bayesian model for the McQueen Shell Ring .................................................. 41 A note on precision 14C and seasonality studies ............................................................................. 43 Contemporaneity and Archaic period shell rings ........................................................................... 44 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 3. Interpreting seasonality from modern and archaeological fishes on the Georgia Coast. ELIZABETH J. REITZ, BRUCE M. SAUL, J.W. MOAK, Gwendolyn D. CARROLL, AND CHARLES W. Lambert ....................................................................... 51 Estuaries and fishes ........................................................................................................................ 52 Background premises ..................................................................................................................... 56 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 56 Caveats ........................................................................................................................................... 61 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 64 Modern South Beach and Cumberland Sound data .................................................................... 64 Archaeological data .................................................................................................................... 71 Comparison ................................................................................................................................. 71 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 77 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 81 Chapter 4. Evaluating δ18O profiles of hardhead catfish and Atlantic croaker otoliths as a method of determining seasonal use of fishes. CAROL E. COLANINNO ...................................... 83 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 84 18 δ Ootolith fractionation factors and estuarine environments ............................................................ 86 3 4 ANTHROPOLOGICAL PAPERS AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 97 δ18O of modern otoliths .................................................................................................................. 89 δ18O of archaeological otoliths ....................................................................................................... 91 The Cannon’s Point Ring ............................................................................................................ 92 The West Shell Ring ................................................................................................................... 92 The McQueen Shell Ring ........................................................................................................... 92 The St. Catherines Shell Ring ..................................................................................................... 92 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 92 18 δ Ootolith, estuarine environments, and archaeological implications .............................................. 92 18 Modern δ Ootolith: problems and areas of future research ........................................................... 92 Archaeological implications ....................................................................................................... 97 Summary and conclusions .............................................................................................................. 98 Appendix 4.1. Modern otoliths sampled for isotopic analysis ....................................................... 99 Appendix 4.2. Archaeological otoliths sampled for isotopic
Recommended publications
  • CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Nos. 32 (1955) To
    REPORTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 75 CHECK LIST AND INDEX TO REPORTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Nos. 32 (1955) to 74 (1968); CHECK LIST OF CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE ARCHAE- OLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY, No. 1 (1965) to No. 30 (1976) AND OTHER INFORMATION ON ACTIVITIES OF THE SURVEY AND THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY, 1948-1972. Robert F. Heizer ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY Department of Anthropology Berkeley 1972 Revised edition, 1976 REPORTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 75 CHECK LIST AND INDEX TO REPORTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Nos. 32 (1955) to 74 (1968); CHECK LIST OF CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE ARCHAE- OLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY, No. 1 (1965) to No. 30 (1976) AND OTHER INFORMATION ON ACTIVITIES OF THE SURVEY AND THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY, 1948-1972. Robert F. Heizer ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY Department of Anthropology Berkeley 1972 Revised edition, 1976 PREFACE We provide here a brief index to Reports No. 32-74 (1955-1968) of the University of California Archaeological Survey, Berkeley (UCAS). This is intended as a continuation of the index of Reports No. 1-30 which was published in UCAS Report No. 31, 1955. To this index is added a check list of Reports No. 1-75 of the UCAS and a check list of Contributions, No. 1-30 of the Archaeological Research Facility of the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley (ARF). Further, a brief history of the University of California Archaeological Survey and its successor, The Archaeological Research Facility, is provided, together with a listing of the manuscripts and maps filed with the Archaeological Research Facility, and a list showing numbers of archaeological sites in the permanent California site file maintained by the ARF.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Cara Rachelle Monroe Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Jochim, Chair Professor Lynn Gamble Professor Michael Glassow Adjunct Professor John R. Johnson September 2014 The dissertation of Cara Rachelle Monroe is approved. ____________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble ____________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow ____________________________________________ John R. Johnson ____________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim, Committee Chair September 2014 Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). Copyright © 2014 by Cara Rahelle Monroe iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing this dissertation has been an intellectual journey filled with difficulties, but ultimately rewarding in unexpected ways. I am leaving graduate school, albeit later than expected, as a more dedicated and experienced scientist who has adopted a four field anthropological research approach. This was not only the result of the mentorships and the education I received from the University of California-Santa Barbara’s Anthropology department, but also from friends
    [Show full text]
  • Mangroves and Coral Reefs: David Stoddart and the Cambridge Physiographic Tradition Colin D
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health Part B 2018 Mangroves and coral reefs: David Stoddart and the Cambridge physiographic tradition Colin D. Woodroffe University of Wollongong, [email protected] Publication Details Woodroffe, C. D. (2018). Mangroves and coral reefs: David Stoddart and the Cambridge physiographic tradition. Atoll Research Bulletin, 619 121-145. Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Mangroves and coral reefs: David Stoddart and the Cambridge physiographic tradition Abstract Mangroves are particularly extensive on sheltered, macrotidal, muddy tropical coastlines, but also occur in association with coral reefs. Reefs attenuate wave energy, in some locations enabling the accretion of fine calcareous sediments which in turn favour establishment of seagrasses and mangroves. Knowledge of the distribution and ecology of both reefs and mangroves increased in the first half of the 20th century. J Alfred Steers participated in the Great Barrier Reef Expedition in 1928, and developed an interest in the geomorphological processes by which islands had formed in this setting. It became clear that many mangrove forests showed a zonation of species and some researchers inferred successional changes, even implying that reefs might transition through a mangrove stage, ultimately forming land. Valentine Chapman studied the ecology of mangroves, and Steers and Chapman described West Indian mangrove islands in the 1940s during the University of Cambridge expedition to Jamaica. These studies provided the background for David Stoddart's participation in the Cambridge Expedition to British Honduras and his PhD examination of three Caribbean atolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Archaic and Early Woodland Shell Mounds at the Mouth of the Savannah River
    BILBO (9CH4) AND DELTA (38JA23): LATE ARCHAIC AND EARLY WOODLAND SHELL MOUNDS AT THE MOUTH OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER Morgan R. Crook, Jr. Antonio J. Waring, Jr. Archaeological Laboratory Department of Anthropology University of West Georgia With Contributions By Steven Hale, David Jarzen, Logan Kistler, Lee Newsom, Fredrick Rich, Dana Russell, Elisabeth Sheldon, and Julie Wieczkowski Sponsored By Cultural Resources Section Office of Environment and Location Georgia Department of Transportation and Waterways Section Office of Intermodal Programs Georgia Department of Transportation Occasional Papers in Cultural Resource Management #17 June 2009 Georgia Department of Transportation Occasional Papers in Cultural Resource Management The Georgia Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Occasional Papers in Cultural Resource Management series consists of archaeological and historical research sponsored by the Georgia DOT. These reports have been produced by Georgia DOT in- house cultural resource staff and by consultants under contract with the Georgia DOT. Reports within the series present information ranging from cultural resource contextual themes to specific data associated with historic properties considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places that would be affected by transportation projects. Each report addresses research questions and the conclusions and interpretations contained therein reflect the theoretical orientation, background, and assorted biases of the authors. Each manuscript has been prepared as a result of a project with Georgia DOT. The reports are distributed by the Office of Environment/Location, Georgia Department of Transportation. For a copy of any or all of the reports, please indicate the specific report; there may be a minimal charge for copying if the report is out of print.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation to Monitor Georgia's Coastal Wetlands
    An Invitation to Monitor Georgia’s Coastal Wetlands www.shellfish.uga.edu By Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, & Ellie Covington First Printing 2003, Second Printing 2006, Copyright University of Georgia “This book was prepared by Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, and Ellie Covington under an award from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM and NOAA.” 2 Acknowledgements Funding for the development of the Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program was provided by a NOAA Coastal Incentive Grant, awarded under the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Zone Management Program (UGA Grant # 27 31 RE 337130). The Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program owes much of its success to the support, experience, and contributions of the following individuals: Dr. Randal Walker, Marie Scoggins, Dodie Thompson, Edith Schmidt, John Crawford, Dr. Mare Timmons, Marcy Mitchell, Pete Schlein, Sue Finkle, Jenny Makosky, Natasha Wampler, Molly Russell, Rebecca Green, and Jeanette Henderson (University of Georgia Marine Extension Service); Courtney Power (Chatham County Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission); Dr. Joe Richardson (Savannah State University); Dr. Chandra Franklin (Savannah State University); Dr. Dionne Hoskins (NOAA); Dr. Charles Belin (Armstrong Atlantic University); Dr. Merryl Alber (University of Georgia); (Dr. Mac Rawson (Georgia Sea Grant College Program); Harold Harbert, Kim Morris-Zarneke, and Michele Droszcz (Georgia Adopt-A-Stream); Dorset Hurley and Aimee Gaddis (Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve); Dr. Charra Sweeney-Reeves (All About Pets); Captain Judy Helmey (Miss Judy Charters); Jan Mackinnon and Jill Huntington (Georgia Department of Natural Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • The Integration of Lidar and Legacy Datasets Provides Improved Explanations for the Spatial Patterning of Shell Rings in the American Southeast
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) Anthropology Datasets Anthropology 2020 The Integration of Lidar and Legacy Datasets Provides Improved Explanations for the Spatial Patterning of Shell Rings in the American Southeast Dylan S. Davis The Pennsylvania State University, [email protected] Robert Dinapoli University of Oregon, [email protected] Matthew Sanger Binghamton University--SUNY, [email protected] Carl Lipo Binghamton University--SUNY, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/anthro_data Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, Linguistic Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, D., DiNapoli, R., Sanger, M., & Lipo, C. (2020). The Integration of Lidar and Legacy Datasets Provides Improved Explanations for the Spatial Patterning of Shell Rings in the American Southeast. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 1-15. doi:10.1017/aap.2020.18 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Datasets by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Integration of Lidar and Legacy Datasets Provides Improved Explanations for the Spatial Patterning of Shell Rings in the American Southeast Dylan S. Davis , Robert J. DiNapoli, Matthew C. Sanger , and Carl P. Lipo ABSTRACT Archaeologists have struggled to combine remotely sensed datasets with preexisting information for landscape-level analyses. In the American Southeast, for example, analyses of lidar data using automated feature extraction algorithms have led to the identification of over 40 potential new pre-European-contact Native American shell ring deposits in Beaufort County, South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin/U S Dept of Commerce National Oceanic
    THE EFFECT OF THE ECfOPARASITIC PYRAMIDELLID SNAIL, BOONEA IMPRESSA, ON THE GROWTH AND HEALTH OF OYSTERS, CRASSOSTREA VIRGINICA, UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS ELIZABETH A. WILSON,' ERIC N. POWELL,' AND SAMMY M. RAY· ABSTRACT BOfYMQ. (= Odostomia) impressa are contagiously distributed on oyster reefs so that some oysters are parasitized more than others. The parasite's mobility and the ability of oysters to recover from snail parasitism may be important in assessing the impact ofparasitism on oyster populations. Duringa 4-week exposure period in the field, B. impressa reduced American oyster, CrasS08trea virgillica, growth rate and increased the intensity ofinfection by the protozoan, Perki71/J'U8 (- Dermoeystidium) marillUB, but produced few changes in the oyster's biochemical composition because. although net productivity was reduced, the oysters retained a net positive energy balance (assimilation> respiration). During a 4-week recovery period, growth rate returned to normal (control) levels, but infection by P. marillUB continued to intensify in previously parasitized oysters kept B. impressa-free. Most changes in biochemical com­ position during recovery, including increased lipid and glycogen contents, could be attributed to the con­ tinuing increase in infection intensity of P. marillUB. Consequently, the temporal stability and size of snail patches. particularly as they regulate infection by P. marillUB, may be the most important factors influencing the impact of B. impressa on oyster reefs. Parasitism can be an important factor affecting the abundantly on oyster reefs from Massachusetts to population dynamics (Wickham 1986; Brown and the Gulf of Mexico, B. impressa has been reported Brown 1986; Kabat 1986) and health (Brockelman in numbers as high as 100 per oyster (Hopkins 1956).
    [Show full text]
  • Turneffe Islands Development Guidelines 2003
    COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND INSTITUTE Turneffe Islands Coastal Advisory Committee TURNEFFE ISLANDS DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERPRETATION 2 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. OBJECTIVES 3 3. SECTORAL POLICIES 3.1 Fishing 5 3.2 Tourism 5 3.3 Land-Use 5 3.4 Dredging 6 3.5 Sensitive Habitats 7 3.6 Utilities 7 3.7 Pollution control 7 3.8 Social Amenities and Recreation 8 3.9 Conservation 9 4. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 9 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 10 ANNEX 1: BACKGROUND I. History of the Turneffe Atoll A-2 II. History of the Turneffe Islands Development Guidelines A-2 III. Current membership on the TICAC A-3 V. Primary Implementation Agencies A-3 ANNEX 2: LAND TENURE ON TURNEFFE I. Turneffe Islands Land Tenure Report A-4 II. Anecdotal Land Tenure History A-11 ANNEX 3: PROVISIONAL DEVELOPMENT SITES A-14 ANNEX 4: MAPS I. Indicative Vegetation Cover A-47 II. Indicative Conservation of Resources A-48 III. Existing Land Use A-49 IV. Indicative Development Sites A-50 2 INTERPRETATION The meaning of the following terms that have been used in the description of the Development Sites follow (see also section 6.2 below): “AGST&D”: means Above Ground Septic Tank with Drain field (in Development Site tables) “BC”: means Belize City (in Development Site tables) “BTB”: means Belize Tourism Board “CZMAC”: means the Coastal Zone Management Advisory Council “DOE”: means the Department of the Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment, GOB “Entry”: means private surveyors registered entry, lodged at the Lands and Survey Department,
    [Show full text]
  • Kiawah Island East End Erosion and Beach Restoration Project
    KIAWAH ISLAND EAST END EROSION AND BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT: SURVEY OF CHANGES IN POTENTIAL MACROINVERTEBRATE PREY COMMUNITIES IN PIPING PLOVER (Charadrius melodus) FORAGING HABITATS FINAL REPORT Submitted to: Town of Kiawah Prepared by: Marine Resources Research Institute Marine Resources Division South Carolina Department of Natural Resources KIAWAH ISLAND EAST END EROSION AND BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT: SURVEY OF CHANGES IN POTENTIAL MACROINVERTEBRATE PREY COMMUNITIES IN PIPING PLOVER (Charadrius melodus) FORAGING HABITATS Final Report Prepared by: Derk C. Bergquist Martin Levisen Leona Forbes Marine Resources Research Institute Marine Resources Division South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Post Office Box 12559 Charleston, SC 29422 Submitted to: Town of Kiawah 21 Beachwalker Drive Kiawah Island, SC 29455 2011 i ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………. v BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………………… 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS…………………………………………………….. 4 Study Sites………………………………………………………………………… 4 Study Design……………………………………………………………………… 7 Field and Laboratory Methods……………………………………………………. 7 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………… 11 RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Habitat Utilization………………………………………………………………… 13 Macroinvertebrate Community…………………………………………………… 14 Macroinvertebrates Identified in Fecal Samples………………………………….. 25 DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………… 30 Caveats Regarding Impact Detection……………………………………………… 30 Macroinvertebrate Communities in Occupied Piping Plover Foraging Areas……………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Cultural Resources
    GNOSS FIELD AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FINAL APPENDIX H CULTURAL RESOURCES This appendix contains the following items: The Cultural Resources Existing Conditions and Survey Methodology Report and Archaeological Survey to support the assessment of the effects of the proposed project on historic properties. Documentation of coordination with tribal governments including the FAA’s government-to-government consultations with tribes in accordance with Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments and FAA Order 1210.20 American Indian and Alaska Native Tribal Consultation Policy and Procedures. Documentation of the FAA’s consultation with the California State Historic Preservation Office in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act that resulted in the FAA’s determination that the Gnoss Field Airport Runway Extension Project would have no effect on historic properties. Landrum & Brown Appendix H - Cultural Resources June 2014 Page H-1 GNOSS FIELD AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FINAL THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Landrum & Brown Appendix H - Cultural Resources June 2014 Page H-2 CULTURAL RESOURCES EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURVEY METHODOLOGY REPORT AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT For the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to Evaluate the Proposed Extension of Runway 13/31 at Gnoss Field Airport Marin County, Novato, California Dwight D. Simons, Ph.C and Kim J. Tremaine, Ph.C., RPA TREMAINE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 859 Stillwater Road, Suite 1 West Sacramento, CA 95605 November 6, 2009 Revised July 18, 2011 Submitted To Landrum and Brown, Inc. 11279 Cornell Park Drive Cincinnati, OH 45242 Page H-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Action Plan for the Conservation Ofmarine Mammals (Mmap) in the Widder Caribbean: a Scientific and Technical Analysis
    UNITED NATIONS EP Distr. LIMITED UNEP(DEPI)/CAR WG.42/INF.29 Add.1 1 March 2021 Original: ENGLISH Ninth Meeting of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) to the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) in the Wider Caribbean Region Virtual meeting, 17–19 March 2021 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OFMARINE MAMMALS (MMAP) IN THE WIDDER CARIBBEAN: A SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS For reasons of public health and safety associated with COVD-19, this meeting is being convened virtually. Delegates are kindly requested to access all meeting documents electronically for download as necessary. *This document has been reproduced without formal editing. Implementation of the Action Plan for the Conservation of Marine Mammals (MMAP) in the Wider Caribbean: A SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Implementation of the Action Plan for the Conservation of Marine Mammals (MMAP) in the Wider Caribbean: A SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS November 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY including from all activities listed in Articles 11(1)(b) of Marine mammals hold a unique place in the collective the Protocol.2 pysche and economies of the Wider Caribbean Region (WCR). As a breeding and calving ground After more than a decade of MMAP-related for some whale species, the warm waters of the programmatic work under the SPAW Protocol, this Caribbean see the perennial return or residency of report compiles and reviews the status of major a diversity of majestic marine mammal species that threats to marine mammals of the region, and aims serve as a boost for tourism and source of inspiration to assess progress by countries towards achieving for some, or a valuable natural resource to be implementation of the MMAP since its adoption consumed or utilized by others.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Models of Settlement for the Florida Gulf Coast
    Chapter 12 Developing Models of Settlement for the Florida Gulf Coast MICHAEL RUSSO AND IRVY R. QUITMYER One puzzle with which archaeologists struggle is determining when people began to be less mobile and more sedentary. In many parts of the world seden- tism is linked to plant domestication. Residential sedentism without domestic plants is less frequently reported. However, Calusa communities on the south- western Gulf coast of Florida in the 16th century A.D. exhibited many features considered hallmarks of sedentary societies: permanent structures, storage facil- ities, large villages, and large-scale public works in the form of shell and earthen mounds. The Calusa political system maintained hegemony over the entire southern tip of the peninsula (Widmer 1988). Although the Calusa lived in per- manently-occupied villages, domesticated plants were not a significant food source (Scarry and Newsom 1992). Instead, Calusa economies were based on the bountiful, non-domesticated plants and animals of Florida’s coastal estuaries, marshes, and swamps. When did this tradition of sedentism in the absence of a domestic food base appear and how was it supported? This study elaborates upon evidence for early sedentism on the southwestern Gulf coast of Florida and reveals two distinct patterns of bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) collection. EVIDENCE FOR SEASON OF USE Traditional markers of sedentism present difficulties for interpreting archaeolog- ical sites in southwestern Florida (Figure 12-1). “Permanent structures” made of leaves and branches degraded quickly and subterranean storage pits were less 235 236 MICHAEL RUSSO AND IRVY R. QUITMYER Figure 12-1. Archaeological and other locations in south Florida mentioned in text.
    [Show full text]