Vol. 4 No. 5, November 26, 1908
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Theological Socialism of the Labour Church
‘SO PECULIARLY ITS OWN’ THE THEOLOGICAL SOCIALISM OF THE LABOUR CHURCH by NEIL WHARRIER JOHNSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham May 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The thesis argues that the most distinctive feature of the Labour Church was Theological Socialism. For its founder, John Trevor, Theological Socialism was the literal Religion of Socialism, a post-Christian prophecy announcing the dawn of a new utopian era explained in terms of the Kingdom of God on earth; for members of the Labour Church, who are referred to throughout the thesis as Theological Socialists, Theological Socialism was an inclusive message about God working through the Labour movement. By focussing on Theological Socialism the thesis challenges the historiography and reappraises the significance of the Labour -
Biographical Sketches of Key Pupils
Appendix E Biographical Sketches of Key Pupils John Godolphin Bennett (1897–1974) was a scientist and philosopher who first met Gurdjieff in Istanbul in 1921 when he was working as an interpreter and personal intel- ligence officer in the British Army. In London that year Bennett began attending meet- ings held by Ouspensky on Gurdjieff’s teaching, and in 1922 he met Gurdjieff again. Bennett made brief visits to Gurdjieff’s Institute at Fontainebleau in February and August of 1923. In the 1930s Bennett formed his own group of followers, and rejoined Ouspensky’s group. In 1946 Bennett established an Institute at Coombe Springs, Kingston-on-Thames in Surrey. After a twenty-five year break Bennett renewed his ties with Gurdjieff in Paris in 1948 and 1949, at which time Gurdjieff taught him his new Movements. In 1949 Gurdjieff named Bennett his ‘official representative’ in England, with reference to the publication of Tales. After Gurdjieff’s death Bennett became an independent teacher, drawing from Sufi, Indian, Turkish, and Subud traditions. In 1953 he travelled through the Middle East hoping to locate the sources of Gurdjieff’s teach- ing among Sufi masters. By the end of his life he had written around thirty-five books related to Gurdjieff’s teaching.1 Maurice Nicoll (1884–1953) studied science at the University of Cambridge before travelling through Vienna, Berlin, and Zurich, eventually to become an eminent psy- chiatrist and colleague of Carl Gustav Jung. Nicoll was a member of the Psychosynthesis group, which met regularly under A.R. Orage, and this connection led Nicoll to Ouspensky in London in 1921. -
People, Place and Party:: the Social Democratic Federation 1884-1911
Durham E-Theses People, place and party:: the social democratic federation 1884-1911 Young, David Murray How to cite: Young, David Murray (2003) People, place and party:: the social democratic federation 1884-1911, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3081/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk People, Place and Party: the Social Democratic Federation 1884-1911 David Murray Young A copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Durham Department of Politics August 2003 CONTENTS page Abstract ii Acknowledgements v Abbreviations vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1- SDF Membership in London 16 Chapter 2 -London -
Dissemination of the Work During Gurdjieff’S Lifetime
DISSEMINATION OF THE WORK DURING GURDJIEFF’S LIFETIME Throughout the course of his teaching Gurdjieff employed deputies or “helper- instructors” to assist with disseminating his ideas. During the Russian phase of the teaching, P.D. Ouspensky and other senior students would often give introductory lectures to newcomers as preparation for Gurdjieff’s presentation of more advanced material. A.R. Orage was responsible for introducing Work ideas to Gurdjieff’s New York groups in the 1920s. Under Gurdjieff’s direction Jeanne de Salzmann organized and led French groups during the 1930s and was largely responsible for teaching Gurdjieff’s sacred dances. Gurdjieff realized that if his teaching was to take root in the West he needed to train and teach students with a Western background who could assist him in making the teach- ing culturally appropriate. Gurdjieff’s efforts to train his assistants may also have come from a desire to develop them into independent teachers in their own right. During a period of physical incapacity following his serious automobile accident in July 1924, Gurdjieff’s Institute at the Prieuré in Fontainebleau virtually ground to a halt. It was then that Gurdjieff realized that none of his students possessed the degree of inner development or the leadership capacity to carry his work forward in his absence: He had to acknowledge what for him was a devastating realization: that the Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man had failed insofar as not a single pupil, nor even all of his students collectively, possessed the inner resources required even temporarily to sustain the momentum of life he had set into motion. -
Consolidated List of Names Volumes I–XV
Consolidated List of Names Volumes I–XV ABBOTTS, William (1873–1930) I ALLEN, Sir Thomas William (1864–1943) I ABLETT, Noah (1883–1935) III ALLINSON, John (1812/13–1872) II ABRAHAM, William (Mabon) (1842–1922) I ALLSOP, Thomas (1795–1880) VIII ACLAND, Alice Sophia (1849–1935) I AMMON, Charles (Charlie) George (1st ACLAND, Sir Arthur Herbert Dyke (1847– Baron Ammon of Camberwell) (1873– 1926) I 1960) I ADAIR, John (1872–1950) II ANCRUM, James (1899–1946) XIV ADAMS, David (1871–1943) IV ANDERSON, Frank (1889–1959) I ADAMS, Francis William Lauderdale (1862– ANDERSON, William Crawford (1877–1919) 1893) V II ADAMS, John Jackson (1st Baron Adams of ANDREWS Elizabeth (1882–1960) XI Ennerdale) (1890–1960) I APPLEGARTH, Robert (1834–1924) II ADAMS, Mary Jane Bridges (1855–1939) VI ARCH, Joseph (1826–1919) I ADAMS, William Edwin (1832–1906) VII ARMSTRONG, William John (1870–1950) V ADAMS, William Thomas (1884–1949) I ARNOLD, Alice (1881–1955) IV ADAMSON, Janet (Jennie) Laurel (1882– ARNOLD, Thomas George (1866–1944) I 1962) IV ARNOTT, John (1871–1942) X ADAMSON, William (1863–1936) VII ASHTON, Thomas (1841–1919) VII ADAMSON, William (Billy) Murdoch (1881– ASHTON, Thomas (1844–1927) I 1945) V ASHTON, William (1806–1877) III ADDERLEY, The Hon. James Granville ASHWORTH, Samuel (1825–1871) I (1861–1942) IX ASKEW, Francies (1855–1940) III AINLEY, Theodore (Ted) (1903–1968) X ASPINWALL, Thomas (1846–1901) I AITCHISON, Craigie (Lord Aitchison) ARTHUR James (1791–1877) XV (1882–1941) XII ATKINSON, Hinley (1891–1977) VI AITKEN, William (1814?–1969) X AUCOTT, -
Consolidated List of Names Volumes I-IX
Consolidated List of Names Volumes I-IX ABBOTTS, William (1873-1930) I ANDERSON, William Crawford (1877- ABLETT, Noah (1883-1935) III 1919) II ABRAHAM, William (Mabon) (1842-1922) APPLEGARTH, Robert (1834-1924) II I ARCH, Joseph (1826--1919) I ACLAND, Alice Sophia (1849-1935) I ARMSTRONG, William John (1870-1950) ACLAND, Sir Arthur Herbert Dyke (1847- V 1926) I ARNOLD, Alice (1881-1955) IV ADAIR, John (1872-1950) II ARNOLD, Thomas George (1866--1944) I ADAMS, David (1871-1943) IV ASHTON, Thomas (1841-1919) VII ADAMS, Francis William Lauderdale (1862- ASHTON, Thomas (1844-1927) I 93) V ASHTON, William (1806--77) III ADAMS, John Jackson (1st Baron Adams ASHWORTH, Samuel (1825-71) I of Ennerdale (1890-1960) I ASKEW, Francis (1855-1940) III ADAMS, Mary Jane Bridges (1855-1939) ASPINW ALL, Thomas (1846--1901) I VI ATKINSON, Hinley (1891-1977) VI ADAMS, William Edwin (1832-1906) VII AUCOTT, William (1830-1915) II ADAMS, William Thomas (1884-1949) I AYLES, Walter Henry (1879-1953) V ADAMSON, Janet (Jennie) Laurel (1882- 1962) IV BACHARACH, Alfred Louis (1891-1966) IX ADAMSON, William (1863-1936) VII BAILEY, Sir John (Jack) (1898-1969) II ADAMSON, William (Billy) Murdoch BAILEY, William (1851-96) II (1881-1945) V BALFOUR, William Campbell (1919-73) V ADDERLEY, The Hon. James Granville BALLARD, William (1858-1928) I (1861-1942) IX BAMFORD, Samuel (1846--98) I ALDEN, Sir Percy (1865-1944) III BARBER, Jonathan (1800-59) IV ALDERSON, Lilian (1885-1976) V BARBER, [Mark] Revis (1895-\965) V ALEXANDER, Albert Victor (1st Earl Al- BARBER, Walter (1864-1930) -
I Took You in the Same Direction Gurney and I Went the Other Day, Through the Same Wood, Along the Leaf-Carpeted Track (Beech Leaves Mainly
Chapter 7: Famous People: In the first of Lionel’s letters in the wartime collection – he makes references to no less than three of his personal acquaintances who made their mark on him and history. All are representative of the left wing and revolutionary liberal intelligencia of the late Victorian and early 20th Century period. I liked to have the account of your busy day. You certainly manage to get a lot in. So you have finished the EC book. Thank you for the few extracts. With regards to Grayson, it was I who introduced him to Carpenter. Didn’t I ever tell you about my friendship with him. I found him at the Hamilton Road Mission in Liverpool when I went and we soon became very friendly, though he was quite ready (before he knew me) to pull me to pieces ! We used to have great discussions at the Debating Society, and he was in my Sunday class of elder scholars. At that time he was just commencing to prepare for the Unitarian Ministry and I coached him in Latin and Greek. At the same time he was doing a lot of public speaking for the Socialists. He never went to M.C.O, (Manchester College Oxford) but for one session, I think, to the H.M.C. (Harris Manchester College) and then gave up the idea. The only time after my leaving Liverpool that I saw much of him was when I proposed his name to Tchertkoff as a companion and kind of tutor to T’s son Dina. -
Gurdjieff, Ouspensky, Orage
Black Sheep Philosophers by Gorham Munson On October 29, 1949, at the American Hospital in Paris died a Caucasian Greek named Georgy Ivanovitch Gurdjieff. A few nights later at Cooper Union, New York, a medal was presented to the revolutionary architect Frank Lloyd Wright. After his part in the ceremony was over, Wright asked the chairman's permission to make are announcement. "The greatest man in the world," he said, "has recently died. His name was Gurdjieff." Few, if any, in Wright's audience had ever heard the name before, which is quite understandable: Gurdjieff avoided reporters and managed most of the time to keep out of the media publicity. However, there was one kind of publicity that he always got in Europe and America, and that was the kind made by the wagging human tongue: gossip. In 1921 he showed up in Constantinople. "His coming to Constantinople," says the British scientist, J.G. Bennett, "was heralded by the usual gossip of the bazaars. Gurdjieff was said to be a great traveler and a linguist who knew all the Oriental languages, reputed by the Moslems to be a convert to Islam, and by the Christians to be a member of some obscure Nestorian sect." In those days Bennett, who is now an expert on coal utilization, was in charge of a British Intelligence section working in Constantinople. He met Gurdjieff and found him neither Moslem nor Christian. Bennett reported that "his linguistic attainments stopped short near the Caspian Sea, so that we could converse only with difficulty in a mixture of Azerbaidjan Tartar and Osmanli Turkish. -
Unpublished Letters of Ezra Pound to James, Nora, and Stanislaus Joyce Robert Spoo
University of Tulsa College of Law TU Law Digital Commons Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works 1995 Unpublished Letters of Ezra Pound to James, Nora, and Stanislaus Joyce Robert Spoo Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/fac_pub Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation 32 James Joyce Q. 533-81 (1995). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unpublished Letters of Ezra Pound to James, Nora, and Stanislaus Joyce Robert Spoo University of Tulsa According to my computation, 198 letters between Ezra so come Pound and James Joyce have far to light. Excluding or letters to by family members (as when Joyce had Nora write for him during his iUnesses), I count 103 letters by Joyce to Pound, 26 of which have been pubUshed, and 95 letters by Pound to Joyce, 75 of which have been published. These numbers should give some idea of the service that Forrest Read performed nearly thirty years ago in collecting and pubUshing the letters of Pound to Joyce,1 and make vividly clear also how poorly represented in print Joyce's side of the correspondence is. Given the present policy of the Estate of James Joyce, we cannot expect to see this imbalance rectified any time soon, but Iwould remind readers that the bulk of Joyce's un pubUshed letters to Pound may be examined at Yale University's Beinecke Library. -
The Fear of Leisure
THE B.B.C. SPEECH ON SOCIAL CREDIT Broadcast in the ‘Poverty in Plenty’ series November 5th, 1934 THE FEAR OF LEISURE An Address to the Leisure Society BY A. R. ORAGE INTRODUCTION L. Denis Byrne Introduction It is indeed a privilege to have known Alfred Richard Orage and to write these few lines of introduction, for in a very real sense he was “the midwife” who brought to birth the world-wide Social Credit Movement. During the early part of the Century, Orage was a literary giant in an era of literary greats in England. Among his friends and associates were Bernard Shaw, G. K. Chesterton, H. G. Wells, Wyndham Lewis, Katherine Mansfield, and others of like stature. As editor of The New Age, despite its limited circulation, Orage’s influence extended throughout the English-speaking world. In 1918, when he first met Major C. H. Douglas, The New Age was the organ of the National Guilds Movement. Once he was convinced of the soundness of Douglas’s ideas, Orage used the columns of The New Age to convince the supporters of the ideal of National Guilds that Social Credit offered an even more fundamentally desirable alternative. Thus, through the influence of The New Age, within a relatively short period the foundation was laid for the world-wide Social Credit Movement in Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. In 1922 Orage retired from active participation in the literary field and went abroad. However, The New Age continued under the editorship of Arthur Brenton to serve as the official organ of the Social Credit Movement. -
Ramiro De Maeztu En La Redacción De the New
RAMIRO DE MAEZTU Y LA REDACCIÓN DE THE NEW AGE: EL IMPACTO DE LA I GUERRA MUNDIAL SOBRE UNA GENERACIÓN DE INTELECTUALES. Andrea Rinaldi University of Bergen Introducción The New Age fue publicada por primera vez en Londres en 1894, y era el principal medio de comunicación de la Sociedad Fabiana, un movimiento de opinión democrático y socialista, vinculado al Partido Laborista, en cuyas filas destacaron intelectuales como George Bernard Shaw, Virginia Woolf y Bertrand Russell. La revista obtuvo rápidamente éxito entre los intelectuales británicos, y lo conservó por lo menos durante las dos primeras décadas del siglo pasado. En 1907 The New Age, bajo la dirección de Joseph Clayton, adquirió un tinte bastante radical que no acababa de encajar con el reformismo gradualista de los fabianos, por lo que la revista sufrió una fuerte caída en las ventas. En mayo del mismo año, dos intelectuales hasta entonces no muy conocidos, Alfred Richard Orage y George Holbrook Jackson, relevaron la revista; los dos consiguieron entrar en la dirección gracias a la ayuda económica de Shaw, que decidió cederles parte de los derechos de autor de la exitosa comedia The Doctor’s Dilemma, y también gracias a la contribución del financiero Lewis Wallace1. Orage era un exprofesor de instituto de Leeds, que había trabajado, junto al mismo Jackson y a Arthur J. Penty, para el Leeds Art Club, un círculo cultural muy activo en la preparación de conferencias de temas varios (política, filosofía, religión, ocultismo, arte, etc.) en las que participaban intelectuales del rango de Yeats o el mismo Shaw. Orage consiguió hacerse rápidamente con el mando exclusivo de la revista; de hecho, Jackson trabajó como coeditor sólo durante el primer año, mientras que Orage fue el único director hasta 1922, año en que decidió venderla2. -
The New Nature Writing: Rethinking the Literature of Place
Smith, Jos. "Introduction." The New Nature Writing: Rethinking the Literature of Place. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. 1–34. Environmental Cultures. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 29 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474275040.0006>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 29 September 2021, 11:15 UTC. Copyright © Jos Smith 2017. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Introduction One fi gure, like no other, looms large in setting the ground for the contemporary form that has come to be called the New Nature Writing. Richard Mabey is an author whose work has consistently pioneered new ways of thinking about landscape, nature, place, culture and the range of interconnections that all of these share. Oft en this has meant reminding us of old ways of thinking about these things but he has always had a sharp eye for the new meanings that our modern context provokes. His monumental Flora Britannica (1996) is a book that embodies some of the best qualities that have become characteristic of the New Nature Writing as a form, so much so that it has inspired an array of like-minded volumes on diff erent topics.1 It is knowledgeable, innovative and inclusive; it relates to a long tradition of similar books while at the same time expanding what that tradition might be capable of; it looks at the plants, fl owers and trees that are its subject with a sharp eye for local distinctiveness; and it meets the changed and changing conditions of the modern world around it with unfl inching resourcefulness.