DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed 2020 Capital Improvement Program New Jersey Turnpike Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed 2020 Capital Improvement Program New Jersey Turnpike Authority PROPOSED 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY March 2020 NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY LEGEND County Boundary PROPOSED 2020 CAPITAL Legislative District Boundary IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projects are listed in approximate chronological order for construction NJTA GSP & TPK Pavement Preservation Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK Hybrid Changeable Message Signs (system-wide) Sussex GSP & TPK Lighting Upgrade Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK Underground Storage Tank Upgrade Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK Median Barrier Improvement Program (system-wide) 24 Passaic GSP & TPK Fiber Optic System Upgrade Program (system-wide) 39 GSP Service Area Ramp Widening Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK ITS Infrastructure and Software Upgrade Program (system-wide) Bergen 13 GSP & TPK Over-Height Vehicle Detection System (system-wide) 26 GSP & TPK Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement Program (system-wide) 40 Morris 38 GSP Corrugated Metal Pipe Replacement and Culvert Rehabilitation (system-wide) Warren 35 1 TPK Interchange 17 Ramp Bridge Replacement 19 37 2 TPK Mainline High-Speed Crossover 3412 GSP & TPK MSE Wall Replacement Program (system-wide) 25 36 29I-3 3 GSP Interchange 6 Completion Essex 11 18 32 4 GSP Interchange 13 Completion 27 5 GSP Interchange 17 Completion 27 133 6 GSP Interchange 20 Completion 28 28 Hudson 29 7 GSP Interchange 29 Completion 31 26 8 GSP Interchange 40 Completion 21 Union 20 25 9 GSP Interchange 80 Completion and Widening between MP 80 - 83 23 14 17 10 22 GSP Interchanges 123 - 124 Completion Somerset 11 GSP Interchange 147 Completion Hunterdon 12 GSP Interchange 153 Improvements 1924 13 GSP Interchange 168 Completion 18 14 TPK Interchange 13, Extend Fourth Mainline Lane 16 17 10 TPK All-Electronic Toll Collection Conversion 2 GSP All-Electronic Toll Collection Conversion 15 GSP Flood Zone Remediation Between Bass River and Middlesex Mullica River/Great Egg Harbor 13 16 GSP Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 98 - 125 16 17 GSP Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 129 - 142 15 18 GSP Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 142 - 154 14 19 GSP Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 154 - 163 Mercer 20 TPK Delaware River Turnpike Bridge Replacement (P.00) Monmouth 11 21 TPK Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 1 - 2 22 TPK Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 2 - 3 23 TPK Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 3 - 4 30 24 TPK Tremley Point Connector at Interchange 12 25 TPK Newark Bay - Hudson County Extension Mainline Widening Between 20 Interchanges 14 - 14A 12 26 TPK Newark Bay - Hudson County Extension Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 14A - 14C 27 TPK Westerly Alignment Mainline Widening Between Southern Mixing Bowl - 15W and Replacement of Laderman Bridge 7 10 28 TPK Westerly Alignment Mainline Widening Between Interchanges 15W - 16W Ocean 9 29 TPK Westerly Alignment Mainline Widening Between 16W 23 8 - North Mixing Bowl and Interchange 16W Ramps 6 Burlington 22 5 9 21 Camden Gloucester 4 Salem 3 15 Atlantic 2 8 Cumberland 1 7 Cape May 6 5 4 3 March 2020 GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM SYSTEM-WIDE Sussex Passaic Bergen Warren Essex Hudson Union Hunterdon Somerset Middlesex Mercer Monmouth Ocean Burlington Camden Gloucester Salem Atlantic Cumberland Cape May GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM LOCATION This project involves supplemental pavement milling and replacement for the System-wide entire roadway system for the Garden State Parkway and New Jersey Turn- pike. This program is intended to supplement the Authority’s annual resurfac- TOTAL PROJECT COST ing program carried out as part of the yearly maintenance projects on both $550 Million facilities. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL / AGENCY COORDINATION SCHEDULE The following environmental permits and agency coordination may be re- Planning & Design: quired for this project: 6 months for first package • NJDEP (flood hazard, waterfront dev., stormwater and SHPO) Construction: • NJ Pinelands Commission Annual Contracts over 10 • Multiple soil conservation districts year period POTENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPACTS BENEFITS None anticipated Safety UTILITIES State of Good Repair Potential multiple utility impacts, will vary from site to site Customer Satisfaction STATUS To be programmed March 2020 GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE HYBRID CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS SYSTEM-WIDE Sussex Passaic Bergen Warren Essex Hudson Union Hunterdon Somerset Middlesex Mercer Monmouth Ocean Burlington Camden Gloucester Salem Atlantic Cumberland Cape May GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE HYBRID CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS LOCATION This project will replace legacy drum signs at 50 locations with improved System-wide technology, fully programmable signs. TOTAL PROJECT COST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL / AGENCY COORDINATION $80 Million The following environmental permits and agency coordination may be re- quired for this project: • NJDEP (wetlands, flood hazard, waterfront dev., SHPO and green acres) SCHEDULE • NJ Pinelands Commission Planning & Design: • Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission 6 months • NJ Sports and Exposition Authority (Meadowlands) Construction: • Multiple Soil Conservation Districts 18 months • USACE (Section 404) • US National Park Service BENEFITS POTENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPACTS Safety To be determined Innovation UTILITIES Customer Satisfaction Potential multiple utility impacts, will vary from site to site STATUS Included in 2019 Capital Improvement Program March 2020 GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE LIGHTING UPGRADES SYSTEM-WIDE Sussex Passaic Bergen Warren Essex Hudson Union Hunterdon Somerset Middlesex Mercer Monmouth Ocean Burlington Camden Gloucester Salem Atlantic Cumberland Cape May GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE LIGHTING UPGRADE PROGRAM LOCATION This project will upgrade existing filament bulb fixtures to LED fixtures and System-wide upgrade the wiring at multiple locations along both the Parkway and the Turnpike. TOTAL PROJECT COST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL / AGENCY COORDINATION $50 Million The following environmental permits and agency coordination may be re- quired for this project: SCHEDULE • NJDEP (wetlands, flood hazard, waterfront dev., SHPO and green acres) Planning & Design: • NJ Pinelands Commission 6 months • Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Construction: • NJ Sports and Exposition Authority (Meadowlands) 24 months • Multiple soil conservation districts • USACE (Section 404) • US National Park Service BENEFITS Safety POTENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPACTS State of Good Repair To be determined Customer Satisfaction UTILITIES Resiliency & Sustainability Potential multiple utility impacts, will vary from site to site STATUS To be programmed March 2020 GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UPGRADES SYSTEM-WIDE Sussex Passaic Bergen Warren Essex Hudson Union Hunterdon Somerset Middlesex Mercer Monmouth Ocean Burlington Camden Gloucester Salem Atlantic Cumberland Cape May GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UPGRADE PROGRAM LOCATION This project involves removing underground storage tanks and replacing System-wide them with above-ground tanks. TOTAL PROJECT COST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL / AGENCY COORDINATION $10 Million The following environmental permits and agency coordination may be re- quired for this project: • NJDEP (flood hazard and site remediation) SCHEDULE • NJ Pinelands Commission Planning & Design: • Multiple soil conservation districts 9 months Construction: POTENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPACTS 18 months To be determined UTILITIES BENEFITS Potential multiple utility impacts, will vary from site to site Safety State of Good Repair STATUS Long-Term Financial To be programmed Stability March 2020 GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE MEDIAN BARRIER IMPROVEMENTS SYSTEM-WIDE Sussex Passaic Bergen Warren Essex Hudson Union Hunterdon Somerset Middlesex Mercer Monmouth Ocean Burlington Camden Gloucester Salem Atlantic Cumberland Cape May GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE MEDIAN BARRIER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM LOCATION This project will replace deteriorated sections of the median barriers on both System-wide roadways. The new median barriers will be designed to the latest design standards and will be prioritized by areas of greatest need. TOTAL PROJECT COST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL / AGENCY COORDINATION $35 Million The following environmental permits and agency coordination may be re- quired for this project: SCHEDULE • NJDEP (flood hazard, waterfront dev., stormwater and SHPO) Planning & Design: • NJ Pinelands Commission 9 months • Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Construction: • Multiple soil conservation districts 18 months POTENTIAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPACTS None anticipated BENEFITS Safety UTILITIES State of Good Repair Potential multiple utility impacts, will vary from site to site Customer Satisfaction STATUS To be programmed March 2020 GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM UPGRADES SYSTEM-WIDE Sussex Passaic Bergen Warren Essex Hudson Union Hunterdon Somerset Middlesex Mercer Monmouth Ocean Burlington Camden Gloucester Salem Atlantic Cumberland Cape May GARDEN STATE PARKWAY & NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM UPGRADE PROGRAM LOCATION This project involves the replacement and expansion of mainline fiber optic System-wide cable and conduits to ensure the future integrity of the system. TOTAL PROJECT COST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL / AGENCY COORDINATION $100 Million The following environmental permits and agency coordination may be re-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WSDOT Design Manual July 2017 Revision
    Publications Transmittal Transmittal Number Date PT 17-039 July 2017 Publication Distribution To: Design Manual Holders Publication Title Publication Number Design Manual – July 2017 M 22-01.14 Originating Organization WSDOT Development Division, Design Office – Design Policy, Standards, and Safety Research Section Remarks and Instructions What’s changed in the Design Manual for July 2017? See the summary of revisions beginning on Page 3. How do you stay connected to current design policy? It’s the designer’s responsibility to apply current design policy when developing transportation projects at WSDOT. The best way to know what’s current is to reference the manual online. Access the current electronic WSDOT Design Manual, the latest revision package, and individual chapters at: www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/m22-01.htm We’re ready to help. If you have comments or questions about the Design Manual, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Area of Practice Your Contacts Geometric Design, Roadside Safety Jeff Petterson 360-705-7246 [email protected] and Traffic Barriers Kurt Sielbach 360/705-7937 [email protected] Chris Schroedel 360-705-7299 [email protected] General Guidance and Support John Donahue 360-705-7952 [email protected] To get the latest information on individual WSDOT publications: Sign up for email updates at: www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/ HQ Design Office Signature Phone Number /s/ Jeff Carpenter 360-705-7821 Page 1 of 8 Remove/Insert instructions for those who maintain a printed manual NOTE: Also
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Garden State Veterinary Specialists One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 | 732-922-0011 | Gsvs.Org
    Directions to Garden State Veterinary Specialists One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 | 732-922-0011 | gsvs.org From Northern New Jersey Take the Garden State Parkway south (or the New Jersey Turnpike south to exit 11 to the Garden State Parkway south). Continue on the GSP (either the local or express lanes) to exit 102. After exiting the Parkway, bear right off the exit ramp onto Asbury Avenue. Approximately 1/2 mile from the exit ramp make a left onto Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From Central New Jersey Take Route 18 south to exit 15A and merge onto the Garden State Parkway south. Take the first exit (Exit 102). After exiting the Parkway, bear right off the exit ramp onto Asbury Avenue. Approximately 1/2 mile from the exit ramp make a left onto Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From Southern New Jersey Take the Garden State Parkway north to Exit 100B. Upon exiting the Parkway you will be on Route 66. Take Route 66 to the first light, make a left at the light (Jumping Brook Road). After the left turn, bear to the left onto Essex Road. Take Essex Road to the end (traffic light), cross over Asbury Avenue and Essex Road will become Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From New York Take the Holland or Lincoln Tunnel to the New Jersey Turnpike south. Follow the Turnpike to exit 11, Garden State Parkway south. Continue on the GSP (either the local or express lanes) to exit 102.
    [Show full text]
  • D) Pavement Milling Machine
    COUNCIL WORKSHOP ITEM ITEM: Recommendation to Purchase a Pavement Milling Machine DATE: 6/5/01 PREPARED BY: Jack J. Bajor, Jr., Director of Public Works Rick Ebel, Pavement Division Manager PURPOSE: Street Pavement Maintenance BID AMOUNT: $ 184,700.00 BUDGET AMOUNT: $ 190,000.00 DISCUSSION: Beginning in the mid-nineties the Public Works Department began discussions on methods of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of our in-house patching and pavement work. Discussions quickly turned to milling or grinding pavement patch areas to a depth of two (2) inches, rather than doing full depth patches of the pavement surface. Pavement thicknesses in Downers Grove are quite variable commonly ranging in depth from six (6) to ten (10) inches. So for a pavement patch of a 10’ X 20’ area, we are removing and replacing approximately 100 to 167 cu.ft. of material with each full depth patch, while the grinder would remove only 33.3 cu.ft. of material for the same 10’ X 20’ patch. Table 1 compares the material volume differences of three patch sizes for full depth patching verses milling. Obviously, if we are taking a greater volume of material out, there is a greater need for the re-installation of new asphalt. On average a three to one reduction can be realized by moving from full depth patching to milling. Additionally, the process to remove a full depth patch is much more labor intensive as the area is first saw cut, then broken out and finally loaded on to a truck with a backhoe. A grinder can complete all three of these steps as it works, again in about a third of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Jersey Exit 8A Area Transportation and Land Use Study
    The New Jersey Turnpike Exit 8A Area Transportation & Land Use Study For The New Jersey Department of Transportation By The Municipal Land Use Center @ The College of New Jersey Spring 2007 Second Printing Acknowledgements This study was funded by the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJ DOT). Without its funding and support in other ways the study would not have been possible. It was then Assistant Commissioner Dennis Keck, who first suggested to me the need for this study now several years ago. The helpful insights provided by the NJ DOT project manager, Paul Truban, along with his supervisor, Talvin Davis, require special mention. We met regularly throughout the one-year period of developing this report. The many stakeholder participants who gave of their time, valuable information and wisdom, through individual interviews, the numerous stakeholder forums and even comments on earlier drafts of this report are too numerous to mention here, but should not go unnoticed. One person in this regard ought to be remembered – Mr. Joseph Montanti – who was a source of great encouragement at the outset, especially for me. Joe represented Monroe Township in those forums. Unfortunately, he passed away in April 2006, just as this project was getting underway. Dr. Wansoo Im, principal of Vertices, Inc., provided his expertise related to the electronic mapping and graphics. Always patient, his work is integral to this project. It is important to note that much of Dr. Im’s work is not immediately evident in this report. He created a tool that is now in the hands of the respective municipalities to help them improve their planning across municipal boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • BJ's Wholesale Club-30 Route 17, Blk 501, Lot 5
    STONEFIELD August 4, 2020 Borough of Paramus Planning Board 1 West Jockish Square #1 Paramus, New Jersey 07652 RE: Traffic & Parking Assessment Report Proposed Fueling Service Addition to BJ’s Wholesale Club Block 501, Lot 5 and Block 502, Lots 2.02 & 9 30 NJSH Route 17 North Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey SE&D Job No. S-19114 Dear Board Members: Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC (“Stonefield”) has prepared this analysis to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed fuel service addition to the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club on the adjacent roadway network. The subject property is located along NJSH Route 17 North to the south of NJSH Route 4 in the Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey. The subject property is designated as Block 501, Lot 5, and Block 502, Lot 9 and 2.02 as depicted on the Borough of Paramus Tax Map. The site has approximately 905 feet of frontage along the NJSH Route 17 North off-ramp to NJSH Route 4. The existing site is currently developed with a BJ’s Wholesale Club. Access is currently provided via one (1) right-turn ingress- only driveway along NJSH Route 17 North, one (1) right-turn ingress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue, and one (1) right-turn egress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue. Under the proposed development program, a fueling station with 10 fueling positions would be constructed in the southerly portion of the existing parking area. The construction of the fueling station would result in a net reduction to the overall parking supply of 103 parking spaces, and 445 parking spaces would be provided for the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study
    Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study r.'l"r.'' ~ u.s. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE ~ LowerLower PassaicPassaic RiverRiver RestorationRestoration ProjectProject andand NewarkNewark BayBay StudyStudy Community Involvement Plan June 2006 PREPARED BY: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 104 Corporate Park Drive White Plains, NY 10602 FOR: US Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Contract No. DACW41-02-D-0003 Community Involvement Plan Lower Passaic River Restoration Project / Newark Bay Study Community Involvement Plan (CIP) Preface We are pleased to release this Community Involvement Plan (CIP) for the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project / Newark Bay Study. The partner agencies are committed to active and open public involvement throughout the life of this project. This CIP provides a toolbox of options for keeping the public informed and for soliciting input. Each respective agency has its own set of guidance with regard to public involvement. This CIP does not attempt to capture every possible outreach initiative among all six partner agencies or fit one specific CIP template. This CIP is divided into two parts to enable the reader to go directly to the sections of greatest interest, and also contains charts and graphics to enable the reader to see at a glance project activities and opportunities for public involvement. Part One includes the following: 1.1 Overview: discusses the purpose and scope of the CIP, as well as legal authorities. 1.2 Project Background: outlines the problems being addressed by the project and describes the project areas and the unique federal-state partnership that is supporting the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan
    I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ I-2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. I-3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. I-3 Housing.................................................................................................................................................... I-7 Circulation ................................................................................................................................................ I-8 Economic Development ......................................................................................................................... I-10 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... I-11 Conservation ......................................................................................................................................... I-12 Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................. I-13 Parks and Recreation ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ
    Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ Prepared for the Montvale Planning Board by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning & Real Estate Consultants Adopted April 1, 2008 MASTER PLAN FOR THE BOROUGH OF MONTVALE BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared for The Montvale Planning Board Prepared by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning and Real Estate Consultants 434 Sixth Avenue New York, New York 10011 125 Half Mile Road—Suite 200 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Adopted April 1, 2008 Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Purpose 1 C. Brief History of Montvale 1 1. Early History 1 2. Incorporation (1894 to 1950) 3 3. 1950 to the Present 4 D. Scope of Master Plan 4 E. Context for Preparation of Master Plan 5 1. Development in Corporate Office Sector 5 2. Downtown Renaissance 6 3. Diversification of Housing Stock 6 4. Acquisition and Improvement of Public Parks and Open Space 6 5. New Community Facilities 7 CHAPTER 2. COMMUNITY RESIDENT AND BUSINESS SURVEYS 8 A. Introduction 8 B. Community Resident Survey 8 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 8 2. Survey Results 10 C. Community Business Survey 30 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 30 2. Results of the Survey 31 3. Analysis of the Survey Results 42 CHAPTER 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 44 CHAPTER 4. LAND USE 47 A. Introduction 47 B. Existing Uses 47 1. Residential 47 2. Non-Residential 52 C. Existing Zoning 56 1. Residential 58 D. Consistency of Existing Uses With Current Zoning 61 E. Montvale’s Land Use Plan 62 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Energy. Remedial Action Work Plan For
    # - i-aq'f 'l.n't{i(ni; ',.Jp ..f*{ oRo-850 REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN FOR THE MAYI'IOOD SITE JULY I9B4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction and Objectives I l.I Background I L.2 Site ldentification I 1.3 Purpose 3 2.O Site Description 4 2.L Site Location and Description 4 2.2 Radiological Description 4 2.3 Site Geology and Hydrology 7 3.0 Management Approach 9 4.0 Work Plan 11 4.L Remedial Action Criteria I1 4.2 Site Characterization L4 4.3 Prelininary Engineering I5 . 4.4 NEPA 16 4.5 Design Engineering L7 4.6 Access Agreenents I7 4.7 Renedial Actions L7 4.8 Occupational Exposures 2L 4.9 Verification Sampling and Analysis 23 4. l0 Waste Volume Projections 25 4.Il Quality Assurance 25 4.L2 l"taintenance and Surveillance 25 5.0 Schedule and Cost 28 6.0 References 30 Appendix A Radiological Survey/t'tonitoring Plan 111 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE I-L t"laywood Interim Storage Site and Vicinity Properties 2-L Waste Burial Sites on Stepan Company Property 4-L Proposed Storage Pile at the MISS 22 5-1 Maywood Site Schedule and Cost Summary 29 LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 4-L Sunmary of Residual Contamination Guidelines L2 for the Maywood Site 4-2 Approximate Waste Volume Projections 27 tv I.O INTRODUCTIONAND OBJECTIVES }.1 BACKGROUND The United States Government initiated the Forurerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in L974.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, Has One Clear Advantage
    The New Yorker: PRINTABLES Page 1 of 14 WATCHING THE WATERFRONT by WILLIAM FINNEGAN Mobsters, terrorists, and the docks of New York Harbor. Issue of 2006-06-19 Posted 2006-06-12 Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, has one clear advantage over most of its competitors for container-ship business in New York Harbor: it’s a straight shot from the Narrows, the harbor’s entrance. From Global’s wharf to Ambrose Seabuoy, out in the Atlantic, where arriving ships meet the pilots, the distance is only fourteen miles. Maurice Byan, the president of Global, told me that ships ca save four hours by docking at his pier, which looks across at lower Manhattan, rather than turning wes and going through the Kill Van Kull and up into Newark Bay, where the biggest container terminals ar in Port Newark and Elizabeth, or to Howland Hook, on the western shore of Staten Island. Also, ships that dock at Global don’t need to pass under the Bayonne Bridge, which is becoming a problem as container ships grow ever larger. Last year, a freighter had to remove its radio towers to make it. Global, at a hundred acres, is a relatively small terminal, but it’s busy. Byan took me on a tour of the pier in his pickup truck, navigating between walls of containers and dodging big, fast-moving equipment—forklifts, bladed stackers, top loaders, and huge rubber-tired gantries, six stories high. “Empty field!” Byan yelled, pointing at some tall piles of multicolored containers, each one eight feet wide by eight feet high and forty feet long, with “CHINA SHIPPING” and “HANJIN” and “P & O NEDLLOYD painted on the sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Sandy Hook Gateway National Recreation Area and Sea Bright Mitigation Report
    Appendix H Sandy Hook Gateway National Recreation Area and Sea Bright Mitigation Report Date: June 30, 2021 Monmouth County Authored by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 1 Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 – COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Communications and Website Travel Portal (SH 1.1) .................................................................................................... 5 Signage on the Garden State Parkway (SH 1.2) ........................................................................................................... 6 Signage on NJ 36 (Navesink Avenue/Memorial Parkway) – Atlantic Highlands (SH 1.3) .............................................. 7 Travel Time Signage (General) (SH 1.4) ....................................................................................................................... 9 Signage on Ocean Avenue – Sea Bright (SH 1.5) ......................................................................................................... 9 2 – TRAVEL BEHAVIOR ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Pedestrian Management (SH 1.2 and SH 1.2)............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]