Proposed 2020 Capital Improvement Program New Jersey Turnpike Authority
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
WSDOT Design Manual July 2017 Revision
Publications Transmittal Transmittal Number Date PT 17-039 July 2017 Publication Distribution To: Design Manual Holders Publication Title Publication Number Design Manual – July 2017 M 22-01.14 Originating Organization WSDOT Development Division, Design Office – Design Policy, Standards, and Safety Research Section Remarks and Instructions What’s changed in the Design Manual for July 2017? See the summary of revisions beginning on Page 3. How do you stay connected to current design policy? It’s the designer’s responsibility to apply current design policy when developing transportation projects at WSDOT. The best way to know what’s current is to reference the manual online. Access the current electronic WSDOT Design Manual, the latest revision package, and individual chapters at: www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/m22-01.htm We’re ready to help. If you have comments or questions about the Design Manual, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Area of Practice Your Contacts Geometric Design, Roadside Safety Jeff Petterson 360-705-7246 [email protected] and Traffic Barriers Kurt Sielbach 360/705-7937 [email protected] Chris Schroedel 360-705-7299 [email protected] General Guidance and Support John Donahue 360-705-7952 [email protected] To get the latest information on individual WSDOT publications: Sign up for email updates at: www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/ HQ Design Office Signature Phone Number /s/ Jeff Carpenter 360-705-7821 Page 1 of 8 Remove/Insert instructions for those who maintain a printed manual NOTE: Also -
Directions to Garden State Veterinary Specialists One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 | 732-922-0011 | Gsvs.Org
Directions to Garden State Veterinary Specialists One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 | 732-922-0011 | gsvs.org From Northern New Jersey Take the Garden State Parkway south (or the New Jersey Turnpike south to exit 11 to the Garden State Parkway south). Continue on the GSP (either the local or express lanes) to exit 102. After exiting the Parkway, bear right off the exit ramp onto Asbury Avenue. Approximately 1/2 mile from the exit ramp make a left onto Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From Central New Jersey Take Route 18 south to exit 15A and merge onto the Garden State Parkway south. Take the first exit (Exit 102). After exiting the Parkway, bear right off the exit ramp onto Asbury Avenue. Approximately 1/2 mile from the exit ramp make a left onto Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From Southern New Jersey Take the Garden State Parkway north to Exit 100B. Upon exiting the Parkway you will be on Route 66. Take Route 66 to the first light, make a left at the light (Jumping Brook Road). After the left turn, bear to the left onto Essex Road. Take Essex Road to the end (traffic light), cross over Asbury Avenue and Essex Road will become Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From New York Take the Holland or Lincoln Tunnel to the New Jersey Turnpike south. Follow the Turnpike to exit 11, Garden State Parkway south. Continue on the GSP (either the local or express lanes) to exit 102. -
D) Pavement Milling Machine
COUNCIL WORKSHOP ITEM ITEM: Recommendation to Purchase a Pavement Milling Machine DATE: 6/5/01 PREPARED BY: Jack J. Bajor, Jr., Director of Public Works Rick Ebel, Pavement Division Manager PURPOSE: Street Pavement Maintenance BID AMOUNT: $ 184,700.00 BUDGET AMOUNT: $ 190,000.00 DISCUSSION: Beginning in the mid-nineties the Public Works Department began discussions on methods of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of our in-house patching and pavement work. Discussions quickly turned to milling or grinding pavement patch areas to a depth of two (2) inches, rather than doing full depth patches of the pavement surface. Pavement thicknesses in Downers Grove are quite variable commonly ranging in depth from six (6) to ten (10) inches. So for a pavement patch of a 10’ X 20’ area, we are removing and replacing approximately 100 to 167 cu.ft. of material with each full depth patch, while the grinder would remove only 33.3 cu.ft. of material for the same 10’ X 20’ patch. Table 1 compares the material volume differences of three patch sizes for full depth patching verses milling. Obviously, if we are taking a greater volume of material out, there is a greater need for the re-installation of new asphalt. On average a three to one reduction can be realized by moving from full depth patching to milling. Additionally, the process to remove a full depth patch is much more labor intensive as the area is first saw cut, then broken out and finally loaded on to a truck with a backhoe. A grinder can complete all three of these steps as it works, again in about a third of the time. -
The New Jersey Exit 8A Area Transportation and Land Use Study
The New Jersey Turnpike Exit 8A Area Transportation & Land Use Study For The New Jersey Department of Transportation By The Municipal Land Use Center @ The College of New Jersey Spring 2007 Second Printing Acknowledgements This study was funded by the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJ DOT). Without its funding and support in other ways the study would not have been possible. It was then Assistant Commissioner Dennis Keck, who first suggested to me the need for this study now several years ago. The helpful insights provided by the NJ DOT project manager, Paul Truban, along with his supervisor, Talvin Davis, require special mention. We met regularly throughout the one-year period of developing this report. The many stakeholder participants who gave of their time, valuable information and wisdom, through individual interviews, the numerous stakeholder forums and even comments on earlier drafts of this report are too numerous to mention here, but should not go unnoticed. One person in this regard ought to be remembered – Mr. Joseph Montanti – who was a source of great encouragement at the outset, especially for me. Joe represented Monroe Township in those forums. Unfortunately, he passed away in April 2006, just as this project was getting underway. Dr. Wansoo Im, principal of Vertices, Inc., provided his expertise related to the electronic mapping and graphics. Always patient, his work is integral to this project. It is important to note that much of Dr. Im’s work is not immediately evident in this report. He created a tool that is now in the hands of the respective municipalities to help them improve their planning across municipal boundaries. -
BJ's Wholesale Club-30 Route 17, Blk 501, Lot 5
STONEFIELD August 4, 2020 Borough of Paramus Planning Board 1 West Jockish Square #1 Paramus, New Jersey 07652 RE: Traffic & Parking Assessment Report Proposed Fueling Service Addition to BJ’s Wholesale Club Block 501, Lot 5 and Block 502, Lots 2.02 & 9 30 NJSH Route 17 North Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey SE&D Job No. S-19114 Dear Board Members: Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC (“Stonefield”) has prepared this analysis to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed fuel service addition to the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club on the adjacent roadway network. The subject property is located along NJSH Route 17 North to the south of NJSH Route 4 in the Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey. The subject property is designated as Block 501, Lot 5, and Block 502, Lot 9 and 2.02 as depicted on the Borough of Paramus Tax Map. The site has approximately 905 feet of frontage along the NJSH Route 17 North off-ramp to NJSH Route 4. The existing site is currently developed with a BJ’s Wholesale Club. Access is currently provided via one (1) right-turn ingress- only driveway along NJSH Route 17 North, one (1) right-turn ingress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue, and one (1) right-turn egress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue. Under the proposed development program, a fueling station with 10 fueling positions would be constructed in the southerly portion of the existing parking area. The construction of the fueling station would result in a net reduction to the overall parking supply of 103 parking spaces, and 445 parking spaces would be provided for the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club. -
Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study
Lower Passaic River Restoration Project and Newark Bay Study r.'l"r.'' ~ u.s. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE ~ LowerLower PassaicPassaic RiverRiver RestorationRestoration ProjectProject andand NewarkNewark BayBay StudyStudy Community Involvement Plan June 2006 PREPARED BY: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 104 Corporate Park Drive White Plains, NY 10602 FOR: US Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Contract No. DACW41-02-D-0003 Community Involvement Plan Lower Passaic River Restoration Project / Newark Bay Study Community Involvement Plan (CIP) Preface We are pleased to release this Community Involvement Plan (CIP) for the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project / Newark Bay Study. The partner agencies are committed to active and open public involvement throughout the life of this project. This CIP provides a toolbox of options for keeping the public informed and for soliciting input. Each respective agency has its own set of guidance with regard to public involvement. This CIP does not attempt to capture every possible outreach initiative among all six partner agencies or fit one specific CIP template. This CIP is divided into two parts to enable the reader to go directly to the sections of greatest interest, and also contains charts and graphics to enable the reader to see at a glance project activities and opportunities for public involvement. Part One includes the following: 1.1 Overview: discusses the purpose and scope of the CIP, as well as legal authorities. 1.2 Project Background: outlines the problems being addressed by the project and describes the project areas and the unique federal-state partnership that is supporting the Lower Passaic River Restoration Project. -
I. Goals and Objectives Ii. Land Use Plan
I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ I-2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. I-3 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................. I-3 Housing.................................................................................................................................................... I-7 Circulation ................................................................................................................................................ I-8 Economic Development ......................................................................................................................... I-10 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................... I-11 Conservation ......................................................................................................................................... I-12 Community Facilities ............................................................................................................................. I-13 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................................... -
New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering -
Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ
Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ Prepared for the Montvale Planning Board by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning & Real Estate Consultants Adopted April 1, 2008 MASTER PLAN FOR THE BOROUGH OF MONTVALE BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared for The Montvale Planning Board Prepared by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning and Real Estate Consultants 434 Sixth Avenue New York, New York 10011 125 Half Mile Road—Suite 200 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Adopted April 1, 2008 Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Purpose 1 C. Brief History of Montvale 1 1. Early History 1 2. Incorporation (1894 to 1950) 3 3. 1950 to the Present 4 D. Scope of Master Plan 4 E. Context for Preparation of Master Plan 5 1. Development in Corporate Office Sector 5 2. Downtown Renaissance 6 3. Diversification of Housing Stock 6 4. Acquisition and Improvement of Public Parks and Open Space 6 5. New Community Facilities 7 CHAPTER 2. COMMUNITY RESIDENT AND BUSINESS SURVEYS 8 A. Introduction 8 B. Community Resident Survey 8 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 8 2. Survey Results 10 C. Community Business Survey 30 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 30 2. Results of the Survey 31 3. Analysis of the Survey Results 42 CHAPTER 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 44 CHAPTER 4. LAND USE 47 A. Introduction 47 B. Existing Uses 47 1. Residential 47 2. Non-Residential 52 C. Existing Zoning 56 1. Residential 58 D. Consistency of Existing Uses With Current Zoning 61 E. Montvale’s Land Use Plan 62 F. -
Department of Energy. Remedial Action Work Plan For
# - i-aq'f 'l.n't{i(ni; ',.Jp ..f*{ oRo-850 REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN FOR THE MAYI'IOOD SITE JULY I9B4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction and Objectives I l.I Background I L.2 Site ldentification I 1.3 Purpose 3 2.O Site Description 4 2.L Site Location and Description 4 2.2 Radiological Description 4 2.3 Site Geology and Hydrology 7 3.0 Management Approach 9 4.0 Work Plan 11 4.L Remedial Action Criteria I1 4.2 Site Characterization L4 4.3 Prelininary Engineering I5 . 4.4 NEPA 16 4.5 Design Engineering L7 4.6 Access Agreenents I7 4.7 Renedial Actions L7 4.8 Occupational Exposures 2L 4.9 Verification Sampling and Analysis 23 4. l0 Waste Volume Projections 25 4.Il Quality Assurance 25 4.L2 l"taintenance and Surveillance 25 5.0 Schedule and Cost 28 6.0 References 30 Appendix A Radiological Survey/t'tonitoring Plan 111 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE I-L t"laywood Interim Storage Site and Vicinity Properties 2-L Waste Burial Sites on Stepan Company Property 4-L Proposed Storage Pile at the MISS 22 5-1 Maywood Site Schedule and Cost Summary 29 LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 4-L Sunmary of Residual Contamination Guidelines L2 for the Maywood Site 4-2 Approximate Waste Volume Projections 27 tv I.O INTRODUCTIONAND OBJECTIVES }.1 BACKGROUND The United States Government initiated the Forurerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in L974. -
Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, Has One Clear Advantage
The New Yorker: PRINTABLES Page 1 of 14 WATCHING THE WATERFRONT by WILLIAM FINNEGAN Mobsters, terrorists, and the docks of New York Harbor. Issue of 2006-06-19 Posted 2006-06-12 Global Terminal, in Bayonne, New Jersey, has one clear advantage over most of its competitors for container-ship business in New York Harbor: it’s a straight shot from the Narrows, the harbor’s entrance. From Global’s wharf to Ambrose Seabuoy, out in the Atlantic, where arriving ships meet the pilots, the distance is only fourteen miles. Maurice Byan, the president of Global, told me that ships ca save four hours by docking at his pier, which looks across at lower Manhattan, rather than turning wes and going through the Kill Van Kull and up into Newark Bay, where the biggest container terminals ar in Port Newark and Elizabeth, or to Howland Hook, on the western shore of Staten Island. Also, ships that dock at Global don’t need to pass under the Bayonne Bridge, which is becoming a problem as container ships grow ever larger. Last year, a freighter had to remove its radio towers to make it. Global, at a hundred acres, is a relatively small terminal, but it’s busy. Byan took me on a tour of the pier in his pickup truck, navigating between walls of containers and dodging big, fast-moving equipment—forklifts, bladed stackers, top loaders, and huge rubber-tired gantries, six stories high. “Empty field!” Byan yelled, pointing at some tall piles of multicolored containers, each one eight feet wide by eight feet high and forty feet long, with “CHINA SHIPPING” and “HANJIN” and “P & O NEDLLOYD painted on the sides. -
Appendix H Sandy Hook Gateway National Recreation Area and Sea Bright Mitigation Report
Appendix H Sandy Hook Gateway National Recreation Area and Sea Bright Mitigation Report Date: June 30, 2021 Monmouth County Authored by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 1 Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 – COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Communications and Website Travel Portal (SH 1.1) .................................................................................................... 5 Signage on the Garden State Parkway (SH 1.2) ........................................................................................................... 6 Signage on NJ 36 (Navesink Avenue/Memorial Parkway) – Atlantic Highlands (SH 1.3) .............................................. 7 Travel Time Signage (General) (SH 1.4) ....................................................................................................................... 9 Signage on Ocean Avenue – Sea Bright (SH 1.5) ......................................................................................................... 9 2 – TRAVEL BEHAVIOR ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Pedestrian Management (SH 1.2 and SH 1.2)............................................................................................................