DOCSLIB.ORG

Garden State Parkway Interchange 40 Improvement Feasibility Study Galloway Township Atlantic County, NJ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Garden State Parkway Interchange 40 Improvement Feasibility Study Galloway Township Atlantic County, NJ Garden State Parkway Interchange 40 Improvement Feasibility Study Galloway Township Atlantic County, NJ Overview The New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Authority) has completed a study to evaluate the need for, and feasibility of completing all missing movements at Interchange 40 on the Garden State Parkway in Galloway Township, New Jersey. Based on the results of the traffic projections and impact analysis performed for each of the alternatives studied, construction of the new ramps to the missing movements at Interchange 40 is not considered critical. The current projected pattern of growth in Galloway Township, as well as the greater Atlantic City region, would not justify completion of the interchange at this time, given the significant infrastructure, utility, and environmental constraints associated with the various alternatives studied. Garden State Parkway (Parkway) Interchange 40 is a partial interchange located approximately one mile south of the Atlantic City Service Area in Galloway Township, Atlantic County, New Jersey. It primarily facilitates access to and from southeastern portions of Galloway Township and Absecon, and provides a secondary un-tolled route into Atlantic City via the White Horse Pike (US 30), a major east-west corridor. Interchange 40 provides partial access to and from the north via a southbound off-ramp to eastbound US 30, and a northbound on-ramp from westbound US 30. A southbound on-ramp and northbound off-ramp do not exist and are considered the missing movements. Access to westbound US 30 from the southbound Parkway, and to the northbound Parkway from eastbound US 30, is currently provided indirectly via a signalized jug handle at 3rd Avenue, approximately 1,400 feet east of the Interchange. History In April 2005, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Authority) conducted a study within the area of Interchanges 40 – 44 to evaluate alternatives to enhance access to and from the south, eliminate the use of the Atlantic City Service Area as an interchange to improve safety, and accommodate future growth in the region. The previous study recommended constructing a new interchange (41) at Jimmie Leeds Road (CR 561), as well as completing Interchange 44, Pomona Road (CR 575), to provide access to and from the south. However, no improvements were recommended at Interchange 40 at that time. At a recent project meeting, Galloway Township requested that the Authority review the findings of the previous study and re-evaluate the potential of completing Interchange 40 to provide full access from both directions on the Parkway. The Township believes that a full interchange would enhance access to US 30, which could in-turn support economic development along the corridor. (See Roadway System Map Figure). Summary of Alternatives The following summarizes the results of the Interchange 40 Improvement Feasibility Study. Technical analyses were performed to project future traffic volumes in order to compare alternatives and to determine if construction of new ramps at Interchange 40 is warranted. The analyses took into account the completion of improvements at Interchange 41, Jimmie Leeds Road (CR 561), and Interchange 44, Pomona Road (CR 575). Traffic projections were developed based on background growth rates, currently planned developments, and potential future development along US 30. Given the proximity of existing large-scale retail centers within five miles of the study area, it was determined that large-scale retail/commercial development, which would attract a large number of vehicles from the Parkway, is not likely to occur along US 30. Furthermore, the proximity of the US 30 corridor, west of the Parkway, to the Atlantic City Airport will further limit the potential for commercial and residential growth between the Parkway and Jimmie Leeds Road. In order to assess the feasibility of completing the missing movements at Interchange 40, four alternatives with various configurations were developed. Concept plans were prepared and advantages/disadvantages and project costs were presented for each alternative for comparison purposes. In addition to the four alternatives developed to complete the missing movements, two additional low cost alternatives that would only provide access to westbound US 30 from the southbound Parkway were evaluated. See Concept Alternatives Figures for all alternatives studied. Comparison of Alternatives The alternatives were compared with respect to traffic operations, cost, right of way requirements, environmental impacts, and infrastructure impacts. Based on these criteria, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative were identified. The traffic analysis concluded that all intersection approaches and ramp segments would operate acceptably in the 2035 Build Condition for all alternatives, with the exception of the southbound approach at the intersection of Damson Avenue and US 30, which would fail in both peak hours in Alternative 1A. Therefore, the comparison of alternatives was based largely on cost, right of way, environmental impacts, and infrastructure impacts. Alternative 1, Full Diamond Interchange, would result in the fewest environmental, ROW, and infrastructure impacts, and would be relatively low-cost, while meeting the project objective of completing all movements at the Interchange. However, this concept would result in two new traffic signals within 500 feet of each other on US 30, would introduce left turns along a section of the corridor where left turns are prohibited, and would signalize the southbound to eastbound movement, a high volume movement that provides access to Atlantic City. In addition, obtaining New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) approval for the closely spaced signalized intersections may be difficult. Alternative 1A, Modified Diamond Interchange, would not necessitate two new traffic signals, but would eliminate existing direct movements and would require the continued use of the Damson Avenue and 3rd Avenue jug handles. Therefore, it would not meet the project objectives of providing full access to and from the Parkway and is not recommended to be considered further. Finally, Alternatives 2 (Northbound Off-Ramp Flyover) and 3 (Partial Diamond with Damson Avenue Ramps) would meet the project objectives and would limit the impact to US 30 by using existing signalized intersections. However, they would both result in significant right of way (ROW) acquisitions, environmental and utility impacts, and would not be justified based on the projected traffic volumes and the proximity to Interchange 41. Although Alternatives 4A and 4B do not meet the full purpose and need to complete all of the missing movements at Interchange 40, one of them could be implemented as a low-cost improvement that would not require major environmental permits. Alternative 4A, New Signalized Intersection at Southbound Off-Ramp, would result in the fewest environmental, ROW, and infrastructure impacts. However, it would only provide access from the southbound Parkway to westbound US 30, and would require a new signalized intersection. Alternative 4B, Southbound Off-Ramp Connection to Damson Avenue, would provide similar access to westbound US 30 and would utilize the existing traffic signal at the intersection of US 30 and Damson Avenue. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directions to Garden State Veterinary Specialists One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 | 732-922-0011 | Gsvs.Org
    Directions to Garden State Veterinary Specialists One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 | 732-922-0011 | gsvs.org From Northern New Jersey Take the Garden State Parkway south (or the New Jersey Turnpike south to exit 11 to the Garden State Parkway south). Continue on the GSP (either the local or express lanes) to exit 102. After exiting the Parkway, bear right off the exit ramp onto Asbury Avenue. Approximately 1/2 mile from the exit ramp make a left onto Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From Central New Jersey Take Route 18 south to exit 15A and merge onto the Garden State Parkway south. Take the first exit (Exit 102). After exiting the Parkway, bear right off the exit ramp onto Asbury Avenue. Approximately 1/2 mile from the exit ramp make a left onto Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From Southern New Jersey Take the Garden State Parkway north to Exit 100B. Upon exiting the Parkway you will be on Route 66. Take Route 66 to the first light, make a left at the light (Jumping Brook Road). After the left turn, bear to the left onto Essex Road. Take Essex Road to the end (traffic light), cross over Asbury Avenue and Essex Road will become Pine Street. The Hospital will be directly in front of you. From New York Take the Holland or Lincoln Tunnel to the New Jersey Turnpike south. Follow the Turnpike to exit 11, Garden State Parkway south. Continue on the GSP (either the local or express lanes) to exit 102.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Jersey Exit 8A Area Transportation and Land Use Study
    The New Jersey Turnpike Exit 8A Area Transportation & Land Use Study For The New Jersey Department of Transportation By The Municipal Land Use Center @ The College of New Jersey Spring 2007 Second Printing Acknowledgements This study was funded by the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJ DOT). Without its funding and support in other ways the study would not have been possible. It was then Assistant Commissioner Dennis Keck, who first suggested to me the need for this study now several years ago. The helpful insights provided by the NJ DOT project manager, Paul Truban, along with his supervisor, Talvin Davis, require special mention. We met regularly throughout the one-year period of developing this report. The many stakeholder participants who gave of their time, valuable information and wisdom, through individual interviews, the numerous stakeholder forums and even comments on earlier drafts of this report are too numerous to mention here, but should not go unnoticed. One person in this regard ought to be remembered – Mr. Joseph Montanti – who was a source of great encouragement at the outset, especially for me. Joe represented Monroe Township in those forums. Unfortunately, he passed away in April 2006, just as this project was getting underway. Dr. Wansoo Im, principal of Vertices, Inc., provided his expertise related to the electronic mapping and graphics. Always patient, his work is integral to this project. It is important to note that much of Dr. Im’s work is not immediately evident in this report. He created a tool that is now in the hands of the respective municipalities to help them improve their planning across municipal boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H Sandy Hook Gateway National Recreation Area and Sea Bright Mitigation Report
    Appendix H Sandy Hook Gateway National Recreation Area and Sea Bright Mitigation Report Date: June 30, 2021 Monmouth County Authored by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 1 Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 – COMMUNICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Communications and Website Travel Portal (SH 1.1) .................................................................................................... 5 Signage on the Garden State Parkway (SH 1.2) ........................................................................................................... 6 Signage on NJ 36 (Navesink Avenue/Memorial Parkway) – Atlantic Highlands (SH 1.3) .............................................. 7 Travel Time Signage (General) (SH 1.4) ....................................................................................................................... 9 Signage on Ocean Avenue – Sea Bright (SH 1.5) ......................................................................................................... 9 2 – TRAVEL BEHAVIOR ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Pedestrian Management (SH 1.2 and SH 1.2)............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Turnpike Authority
    New Jersey Turnpike Authority 2002 ANNUAL REPORT THE 51ST YEAR 1 JAMES E. McGREEVEY JOSEPH SIMUNOVICH, Chairman GOVERNOR JOSEPH (J.P.) MIELE, Vice Chairman JOHN HIBBS, Treasurer FRANK X. McDERMOTT, Commissioner HARRY LARRISON, Jr., Commissioner JOHN LETTIERE, Commissioner MICHAEL LAPOLLA, Executive Director To the Honorable James E. McGreevey, Governor, and the Members of the New Jersey Legislature: t is my pleasure to present you with the 2002 Annual Report for the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. This year marks a milestone for the INew Jersey Turnpike in that we enter our 51st year of operation — poised to build on our previous successes for the enhanced convenience of New Jersey’s motorists. Over the past three years our annual reports have celebrated our proud history and many accomplishments since the creation of the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. This year, our mission has been different. We are no longer celebrating out past, but instead are preparing for our future. For the New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 2002 has been a year of transition and preparation for greater things to come. Today we stand here with our eyes focused squarely on the future and ready to take the monumental steps towards changing the face of transportation in New Jersey. James E. McGreevey Governor Once again, on behalf of the Board of Commissioners of the New Jersey Turnpike Authority it is my privilege to present you with this year’s annual report. We look forward to continuing to work with your administration to ensure the best for our motorists. Cordially, Joseph Simunovich Chairman 2 New Jersey Turnpike Authority NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY COMMISSIONERS Joseph Simunovich Chairman John Hibbs Joseph (J.P.) Miele Treasurer Vice Chairman Raymond M.
    [Show full text]
  • US 130 Corridor Study
    US 130 Corridor Study -, YEAR 2020 PLANNING CORRIDORS REPORT 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111III1III1IIIII1I11111I111111111 1 11111111111I11111111111I DELA'W ARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION US 130 CORRIDOR STUDY TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION G Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission August, 1997 The preparation of this report was funded through federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Adminstration (FTA) and the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT). The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency which provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning for the orderly growth and development of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. The Commission is an advisory agency which divides its planning and service functions among the Office of the Executive Director, the Office of Public Affairs, and three line Divisions: Transportation Planning, Regional Planning and Administration. DVRPC's mission for the 1990s is to emphasize technical assistance and services and to conduct high priority studies for member state and local governments, while determining and meeting the needs of the private sector. The DVRPC logo is adapted from the official seal of the Commission and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River flowing through it.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Investigation for Determination of Area in Need of Redevelopment U.S. Route 130 Corridor Township of Florence In
    Preliminary Investigation for Determination of Area in Need of Redevelopment U.S. Route 130 Corridor Township of Florence In the County of Burlington State of New Jersey Remington, Vernick & Arango Engineers, Inc. 243 Route 130, Suite 200 Bordentown, New Jersey 08505 October 2009 _________________________ __________________________________ Craig F. Remington, P.L.S., P.P. Joseph M. Petrongolo, L.L.A., R.L.A., P.P. Vice President License #33LI00525100 License #33LI00187700 Mayor William Berry Township Council William Berry, Mayor Frank K. Baldorossi, Jr., Council President Dennis O’Hara, Vice President Bruce Garganio Sean Patrick Ryan Jerry Sandusky Township Solicitor William John Kearns, Jr., Esq. Clerk Joy Weiler, RMC/MMC Planning Board Members Mildred Hamilton-Wood, Chairman Timothy Lutz, Vice Chairman William Berry, Mayor James Molimock Wayne Morris Paul Ostrander Sean Patrick Ryan, Council Member Frederick Wainwright David Woolston Planning Board Attorney David Frank, Esquire Planning Board Professionals Dante Guzzi, P.E., Engineer Joseph Petrongolo, L.L.A., R.L.A., P.P., Planner Planning Board Clerk Nancy Erlston Preliminary Investigation for Determination of Area in Need of Redevelopment U.S. Route 130 Township of Florence, Burlington County, New Jersey Preliminary Investigation For Determination Of Area In Need Of Redevelopment Table of Contents 1. Introduction…………………………………………………….. Page 1 2. Redevelopment Process………………………………………… Page 2 3. Study Area Delineation and Planning Setting………………… Page 3 4. Statutory Criteria………………………………………………. Page 6 5. Description of Existing Study Area Conditions……………… Page 8 6. Application of Statutory Criteria………………………..…..…. Page 16 7. Conclusion……………………………………………………… Page 26 8. Recommendation………………………………………………. Page 30 Appendix A: Township Council Authorizing Resolution…… Page 31 Preliminary Investigation for Determination of Area in Need of Redevelopment U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Plate We Bill You
    A Listing of E-ZPass and PA Turnpike TOLL BY PLATE Rates for All Classes of Vehicles Effective January 3, 2021 SECTION 1 : E-ZPass Rates | SECTION 2 : PA Turnpike TOLL BY PLATE Rates PA TURNPIKE TOLL PLATE WE BILL YOU 2021 TOLL SCHEDULE A Listing of E-ZPass Rates for All Classes of Vehicles Effective January 3, 2021 E-ZPass Rates PA TURNPIKE TOLL PLATE WE BILL YOU 2021 TOLL SCHEDULE Mainline Turnpike 43 - Mon/Fayette Expressway - PA/WV State Line to Uniontown ..........................................Page 44 30 Warrendale .............................................................Page 2 Turnpike 43 - Mon/Fayette Expressway - 39 Butler Valley ...........................................................Page 3 Uniontown to Brownsville ...................................................Page 45 48 Allegheny Valley .....................................................Page 4 Turnpike 43 - Mon/Fayette Expressway - 57 Pittsburgh ...............................................................Page 5 US 40 to PA 51 ..................................................................Page 46 67 Irwin .......................................................................Page 6 Turnpike 66 .......................................................................Page 47 75 New Stanton ...........................................................Page 7 91 Donegal ..................................................................Page 8 Clarks Summit & Keyser Avenue ........................................Page 48 110 Somerset ................................................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Stores 1 Mile from Major Highway Exits
    Fuel Stores 1 Mile From Major Highway Exits I-95 Store City State Exit # 854 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) CLAYMONT DE 10 863 NEW CASTLE DE 5A 867 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) CLAYMONT DE 11 5173 PORT ORANGE FL 256 5202 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) VERO BEACH FL 147 5211 WEST PALM BEACH FL 69A 5214 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) RIVIERA BEACH FL 76 5221 PORT SAINT LUCIE FL 18 5223 PALM SPRINGS FL 66 5232 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) FORT LAUDERDALE FL 27 5234 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 32 5239 BOYNTON BEACH FL 60 5242 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) DEERFIELD BEACH FL 42 5254 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) FORT PIERCE FL 129 5283 MELBOURNE FL 183 5317 PALM BAY FL 173 5318 WEST MELBOURNE FL 176 5333 JACKSONVILLE FL 346B 547 ELKTON MD 109A-B 581 ABINGDON MD 77B 593 BELTSVILLE MD 25 597 CAPITOL HEIGHTS MD 13 599 JOPPA MD 74 8502 BALTIMORE MD 59 8504 BALTIMORE MD 49A 8511 BALTIMORE MD 57 8339 LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP NJ 67 8013 PHILADELPHIA PA 23 8020 LEVITTOWN PA 44 8053 PHILADELPHIA PA 12A 8104 PHILADELPHIA PA 27 8112 PHILADELPHIA PA 22 8131 PHILADELPHIA PA 22 8132 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) PHILADELPHIA PA 17 655 (Hosts CCS & CHAdeMO EV charging) RICHMOND VA 81 660 FREDERICKSBURG VA 130B 661 WOODBRIDGE VA 158B 662 WOODBRIDGE VA 156 667 FREDERICKSBURG VA 130A 668 FREDERICKSBURG VA 143B 677 GLEN ALLEN VA 83A-B 683 PETERSBURG VA 48A-B 684 COLONIAL HEIGHTS VA 58 692 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) CHESTER VA 62 697 (Hosts Tesla Supercharging) STAFFORD VA 143B 8607 ASHLAND VA 86B 8617 FREDERICKSBURG VA 126 8624 COLONIAL HEIGHTS VA 54 8627 FREDERICKSBURG VA 133B 8648 RICHMOND
    [Show full text]
  • Garden State Parkway Congestion Relief Plan
    A Report to Acting Governor Donald T. DiFrancesco Garden State Parkway Congestion Relief Plan A Proposed Framework James Weinstein Commissioner of Transportation August 2001 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal 1 Executive Summary 4 Overview 5 About the Parkway 6 The Plan 8 Financial Impact 10 Congestion Relief 10 Recommended Phased Plan – Synopsis 12 Plan Objectives 13 Phase 1 15 Phase 2 21 Phase 3 25 Phase 4 30 Financial Summary 31 Cost of Complete Toll Removal 32 Appendicies A. Executive Order 128 B. NJIT Traffic Modeling C. Congestion Relief Projects And Free-Flow E-ZPass Funding Schedule D. Barrier Removal Schedule E. Ramp Toll Removal F. Comparative North American Toll Rates ii Letter of Transmittal (1) Executive Summary (4) Overview On May 31, 2001 Acting Governor Donald T. DiFrancesco, in the face of growing public concern over congestion on the Garden State Parkway, issued Executive Order 128. This order directed the Commissioner of Transportation to submit within 60 days a plan to eliminate toll barriers on the Parkway over a period of not more than 10 years. That plan – along with supporting documentation – is contained herein. The plan is responsive to the requirements of Executive Order 128. As directed, the plan lays out an implementation schedule for achieving Acting Governor DiFrancesco’s goal of toll barrier elimination that can begin almost immediately and be completed within 10 years. Elimination of toll barriers in one direction and installation of free-flow E-ZPass in the other – as recommended - will result in varying levels of congestion relief for the traveling public.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportations Operations Task Force Meeting
    TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS TASK FORCE MEETING HIGHLIGHTS April 18th, 2019 1. Welcome and Introductions Chris King, Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), welcomed members and thanked them for attending. Mr. King reminded attendees the group has been meeting for nearly twenty years and the spring forum is typically reserved for construction projects that have a regional impact. 2. Two Minute Agency Reports Each person in attendance introduced themselves and added any relevant updates from their agency. Highlights include: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC): The Bucks County Incident Management Task Force recently hosted a complex incident response seminar, attracting over seventy first responders and providing CEUs for EMS personnel. The operations group also presented at this month’s Transactions conference in Atlantic City, representing the agency on a regional TSMO panel. Last month, the DVRPC board approved the 2020 Work Program, which included continued funding for Transportation Operations and TSMO programs. The New Jersey TIP will be updated this year. FHWA has opened its BUILD (formerly TIGER) grant application. Applications are due by July. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT): Variable Speed Limit (VSL) signs are going up along I-76 and once the software has been approved will become operational and enforceable in summer 2019. The plans for the new District 6 Transportation Management Center is continuing to progress and will soon go out to bid. The Philadelphia County tow contract is under a ‘best value versus low bid’ review by PennDOT Central Office. Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT): A number of small tornadoes touched down in the state earlier in the month.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE Contract No
    T200.265 NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE Contract No. T200.265 Drainage Repairs (2013) Mileposts 117 to 122 Bergen County TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Proposal Bond ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Letter of Surety ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Contract Agreement .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Contract Bond ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Power of Execution .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Standard Specifications ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Supplementary Specifications ................................................................................................................................ 1 Division 100 - General Provisions .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Skylands at Randolph 792 Route 10 West Randolph, Nj 07860 973-328-8600 Fax: 973-989-3970
    THE SKYLANDS AT RANDOLPH 792 ROUTE 10 WEST RANDOLPH, NJ 07860 973-328-8600 FAX: 973-989-3970 Directions : From South Jersey & Philadelphia Area: Take either Garden State Parkway north (Exit 127) or NJ Turnpike north (Exit 10) to 287 north to Route 10 West (Exit 39). Take Route 10 West 9.2 miles to Skylands on the right. Skylands is not immediately visible from the road. Just before the entrance, watch for a "Dai rQyueen" and the "Bethlehem Church" and immediately get into the right lane to enter Skylands. From Manhattan: Take Lincoln Tunnel to Route 3 West. Follow to 46 West. Take Route 46 to 80 West (or from George Washington Bridge take 80 West to 287 South (Exit 43) to Route 10 West (Exit 39B). Route 10 West to Skylands (follow above directions). From Newark Airport: Take 78 West to Route 24 West. Follow to I-287. Take I-287 North to Route 10 (Exit 39). Route 10 West to the Skylands (follow as above). From the George Washington Bridge: Take Route 80 West (Approx. 1/2 hr.) to Exit 43 to Route 287 South. Take route 287 South (3 Miles) to Route 10 West (Exit 39B). Follow as above. From Rockland County (Monsey Area): Take New York State Thru Way North to Exit 15 to Route 287 South (follow as above). From Goethals Bridge: Take New Jersey Turnpike North to Exit 14 (Newark Airport) - Take Route 78 West t o Route 24 West. Continue almost until end - Take Route 287 North one exit to Route 10 West (Exit 39).
    [Show full text]