DOCSLIB.ORG

Wikiskills Empowering and Fostering Social, Professional, Cultural and Civic Skills Through Pedagogical Use of Wiki Technologies and Methodologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wikiskills Empowering and Fostering Social, Professional, Cultural and Civic Skills Through Pedagogical Use of Wiki Technologies and Methodologies LLP – KA3 ICT multilateral projects D 2.1– European state of the art report WikiSkills Empowering and fostering social, professional, cultural and civic skills through pedagogical use of Wiki technologies and methodologies. DELIVERABLE 2.1– European state of the art report Work Package: 2 Task No: 2.1 Task Responsible: HEIG-VD Miguel Alarcón, Florence Devouard, Anna Coordinated by : Bauer, Frédérique Frossard Contributors: All partners Due date of deliverable: (31/03/2012) Actual submission date: (31/03/2012) Project N°: 519291-LLP-1-2011-1-CH-KA3-KA3MP 1/101 LLP – KA3 ICT multilateral projects D 2.1– European state of the art report Pages Version Date Authors Changes Changed Added Deleted 1 24/03/12 2 30/04/12 Global graphs 3 25/05/12 QA modifications The WIKI-Skills project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Status: Definitive Version Project N°: 519291-LLP-1-2011-1-CH-KA3-KA3MP 2/101 LLP – KA3 ICT multilateral projects D 2.1– European state of the art report Summary WikiSkills -Empowering and fostering social, professional, cultural and civic skills through pedagogical use of Wiki technologies and methodologies- is a project partially funded by the European Commission, Lifelong Learning Programme Centralized, KA3 Multilateral projects (2012- 2013). In this perspective, Deliverable 2.1 – European state of the art report – aims at describing the situation in Europe regarding Wiki tools uses within the 4 LLP target groups. To this end, a desktop research and a selection of good practices have been conducted in each partner country, in order to identify the status of those wiki tools in European educational environments. Moreover, the report includes an on-line national survey addressed to educational practitioners of each partner country. To facilitate the readability of this document, the following table summarizes the project’s partners, acronyms and countries. Acronym Partner full name Country YORG Fondation Ynternet.org Switzerland die Berater "die Berater" Unternehmensbertungs GmbH Austria EA Ellinogermaniki Agogi School Greece UB University of Barcelon Spain MAC-Team Pôle Européen des Coopérations Multi-Acteurs (aisbl) Belgium HEIG-VD Haute Ecole d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du canton de Vaud Switzerland CESGA Fundación Centro Tecnológico de Supercomputación de Galicia Spain Wikimedia.se Wikimedia Sverige Sweden (Table 1.1: WikiSkills consortium) The present document sums up the results of the desktop research of wiki tools, existing projects, good practices and results of the national on-line survey. Finally, an analysis of success factors using wikis in educational contexts is included as a result of the previous parts of the report. This document will be, together with D2.2 -Needs analyse report-, the bases of the Pedagogical Framework. Project N°: 519291-LLP-1-2011-1-CH-KA3-KA3MP 3/101 LLP – KA3 ICT multilateral projects D 2.1– European state of the art report Table of Contents 1.Literature review............................................................................................................................6 1.1.General definition and history of wiki..........................................................................................6 1.2 Use of wikis in educational context. Collaborative learning......................................................13 1.3 Comparison between wiki and other tools................................................................................19 1.4 Legal consideration about wikis................................................................................................23 2.Existing platforms.......................................................................................................................27 2.1 Analysis of existing wiki software.............................................................................................27 2.2 Analyse of existing wiki farms...................................................................................................35 2.3 Wikimatrix, a reference website................................................................................................40 3.Existing wiki based projects......................................................................................................41 3.1 Wikipedia..................................................................................................................................41 3.2 Wikibooks.................................................................................................................................41 3.3 Wikitravel..................................................................................................................................42 3.4 Appropedia...............................................................................................................................42 3.5 Ekopedia...................................................................................................................................42 3.6 Vikidia.......................................................................................................................................43 3.7 Minecraft Wiki...........................................................................................................................43 3.8 MeatballWiki.............................................................................................................................44 3.9 Scholarpedia.............................................................................................................................44 3.10 Jurispedia...............................................................................................................................45 3.11 Kinesiology.............................................................................................................................45 3.12 WikiEducator..........................................................................................................................46 4. Good Practices...........................................................................................................................47 4.1 Collaborative storytelling with wikis..........................................................................................47 4.2 Learning scenario CESGA.......................................................................................................50 4.3 Learning scenario Communication and Networking.................................................................53 4.4 PhD students and young researchers to create and disseminate expert content....................56 4.5 Learning scenario Photo hunt...................................................................................................61 Project N°: 519291-LLP-1-2011-1-CH-KA3-KA3MP 4/101 LLP – KA3 ICT multilateral projects D 2.1– European state of the art report 4.6 Villa Mimmi – portraying fellow humans using a wiki 1............................................................65 4.7 Learning scenario Wiki writing on paper..................................................................................68 5. Results of national survey.........................................................................................................71 5.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................71 5.2 National results.........................................................................................................................71 5.3 Global Graphs results...............................................................................................................86 5.4 Conclusions..............................................................................................................................94 6. success factors using wikis in educational context...............................................................95 6.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................95 6.2 Advantages...............................................................................................................................95 6.3 Barriers.....................................................................................................................................96 6.4 Success Factors.......................................................................................................................96 6.5 Conclusions..............................................................................................................................98 References....................................................................................................................................100 Project N°: 519291-LLP-1-2011-1-CH-KA3-KA3MP 5/101 LLP – KA3 ICT multilateral projects D 2.1– European state of the art report 1. LITERATURE REVIEW This section aims at introducing the concept of wiki from their history, going through collaborative learning and wiki applications in educational contexts and finally a comparison between wikis and other similar software’s and tools. This will give us a general vision and state of wiki tools to going through next steps of the document. 1.1. General definition and history of wiki 1.1.1.Definition of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using New Technologies for Library Instruction in Science and Engineering: Web 2.0 Applications
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln October 2006 Using New Technologies for Library Instruction in Science and Engineering: Web 2.0 Applications Virginia A. Baldwin University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Baldwin, Virginia A., "Using New Technologies for Library Instruction in Science and Engineering: Web 2.0 Applications" (2006). Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries. 56. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/56 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Using New Technologies for Library Instruction in Science and Engineering: Web 2.0 Applications “Quantum computation is... a distinctively new way of harnessing nature... It will be the first technology that allows useful tasks to be performed in collaboration between parallel universes.” … David Deutsch, The Fabric of Reality: the Science of Parallel Universes-- and its Implications http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/David_Deutsch INTRODUCTION The transformational concept of Web 2.0 for libraries was a hot topic at three major conferences in June of 2006. The American Library Association (ALA), Special Libraries Association (SLA), and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conferences all had sessions on the subject. Not all of the focus was on sci-tech libraries. An exploration of the use of these technologies for library instruction in science and engineering fields is the emphasis for this column.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia and Intermediary Immunity: Supporting Sturdy Crowd Systems for Producing Reliable Information Jacob Rogers Abstract
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM O CTOBER 9 , 2017 Wikipedia and Intermediary Immunity: Supporting Sturdy Crowd Systems for Producing Reliable Information Jacob Rogers abstract. The problem of fake news impacts a massive online ecosystem of individuals and organizations creating, sharing, and disseminating content around the world. One effective ap- proach to addressing false information lies in monitoring such information through an active, engaged volunteer community. Wikipedia, as one of the largest online volunteer contributor communities, presents one example of this approach. This Essay argues that the existing legal framework protecting intermediary companies in the United States empowers the Wikipedia community to ensure that information is accurate and well-sourced. The Essay further argues that current legal efforts to weaken these protections, in response to the “fake news” problem, are likely to create perverse incentives that will harm volunteer engagement and confuse the public. Finally, the Essay offers suggestions for other intermediaries beyond Wikipedia to help monitor their content through user community engagement. introduction Wikipedia is well-known as a free online encyclopedia that covers nearly any topic, including both the popular and the incredibly obscure. It is also an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, an example of one of the largest crowd- sourced, user-generated content websites in the world. This user-generated model is supported by the Wikimedia Foundation, which relies on the robust intermediary liability immunity framework of U.S. law to allow the volunteer editor community to work independently. Volunteer engagement on Wikipedia provides an effective framework for combating fake news and false infor- mation. 358 wikipedia and intermediary immunity: supporting sturdy crowd systems for producing reliable information It is perhaps surprising that a project open to public editing could be highly reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration and Social Media-2008
    Research Report Collaboration and Social Media-2008 Taking Stock of Today’s Experiences and Tomorrow’s Opportunities Geoffrey Bock Steve Paxhia The Gilbane Group June 9, 2008 Gilbane Group Inc. 763 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 USA Tel: 617.497.9443 Fax: 617.497.5256 [email protected] http://gilbane.com With Thanks to Our Sponsors Platinum Gold Silver ©2008 Gilbane Group, Inc. i http://gilbane.com Collaboration and Social Media — 2008 Table of Contents With Thanks to Our Sponsors .................................................................................. i Our Perspective ................................................................................. vi How American Companies Use Social Media ....................................... i Tracking Social Media ............................................................................................. 2 Adopting Social Media .............................................................................................. 5 Social Media Profiles .............................................................................................. 10 A Social Media Roadmap ....................................................................................... 30 Customer Stories ............................................................................. 32 Awareness at Earth Knowledge ............................................................................. 33 EMC Documentum eRoom at Bechtel ................................................................... 36 EMC Documentum eRoom
    [Show full text]
  • Xwiki Enterprise 8.4.4 Developer Guide - Xwiki Rendering Macros in Java Xwiki Enterprise 8.4.4 Developer Guide - Xwiki Rendering Macros in Java
    XWiki Enterprise 8.4.4 Developer Guide - XWiki Rendering Macros in Java XWiki Enterprise 8.4.4 Developer Guide - XWiki Rendering Macros in Java Table of Contents Page 2 XWiki Enterprise 8.4.4 Developer Guide - XWiki Rendering Macros in Java • XWiki Rendering Macros in Java • Box Macro • Cache Macro • Chart Macro • Children Macro • Code Macro • Comment Macro • Container Macro • Content Macro • Context Macro • Dashboard Macro • Display Macro • Document Tree Macro • Error Message Macro • Footnote Macro • Formula Macro • Gallery Macro • Groovy Macro • HTML Macro • ID Macro • Include Macro • Information Message Macro • Office Macro • Put Footnotes Macro • Python Macro • RSS Macro • Script Macro • Success Macro Message • Table of Contents Macro • Translation Macro • User Avatar Java Macro • Velocity Macro • Warning Message Macro XWiki Rendering Macros in Java Overview XWiki Rendering Macros in Java are created using the XWiki Rendering architecture and Java. In order to implement a Java macro you will need to write 2 classes: • One that representing the allowed parameters, including mandatory parameters, default values, parameter descriptions. An instance of this class will be automatically populated when the user calls the macro in wiki syntax. • Another one that is the macro itself and implements the Macro interface. The XWiki Rendering Architecture can be summarized by the image below: The Parser parses a text input like "xwiki/2.0" syntax or HTML and generates an XDOM object. This object is an Abstract Syntax Tree which represents the input into structured blocks. The Renderer takes an XDOM as input and generates an output like "xwiki/2.0" syntax, XHTML or PDF. The Transformation takes an XDOM as input and generates a modified one.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT
    Case 18-396, Document 116, 08/30/2018, 2379414, Page1 of 28 18-396 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT dMATTHEW HERRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, —against— GRINDR LLC, KL GRINDR HOLDINGS INC., GRINDR HOLDING COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF FOR AMICI CURIAE COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, MATCH GROUP, INC., GLASSDOOR, INC., AND INDEED, INC. IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES AMBIKA K. DORAN JAMES ROSENFELD ROBERT E. MILLER DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP (attorney admission forthcoming) 1251 Avenue of the Americas, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 21st Floor 1201 Third Avenue New York, New York 10020 Seattle, Washington 98101 (212) 489-8230 (206) 622-3150 Attorneys for Amici Curiae Computer & Communications Industry Association, Match Group, Inc., Glassdoor, Inc., and Indeed, Inc. Case 18-396, Document 116, 08/30/2018, 2379414, Page2 of 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CORPORATE DISCLOSURE ............................................................................... 1 STATEMENT OF INTEREST ............................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................ 3 A. Courts Have Interpreted Section 230 Broadly to Fulfill Its Twin Goals of Encouraging Free Speech and Self-Policing Objectionable
    [Show full text]
  • 100+ Ways to Assess
    1 2 100+ Ways to Assess: 1. Annotated Bibliography: a list of citations followed by a brief descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the purpose of which is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. 2. Assessment Stations: students rotate between different stations which have different questions to answer at them; e.g. a science practical assessment where questions relate to particular artefacts at each station. 3. Book Review: gives the reader a concise summary of the content including a relevant description of the topic as well as its overall perspective, argument, or purpose. Second, and more importantly, a review offers a critical assessment of the content. 4. Business Plan: a formal statement of business goals, reasons they are attainable, and plans for reaching them. It may also contain background information about the organization or team attempting to reach those goals. 5. Capstone Project: students pursue independent research on a question or problem of their choice, engage with the scholarly debates in the relevant disciplines, and produce a substantial thesis/dissertation providing a deep understanding of the topic. 6. Case Study: detailed examination of a subject of study (the case), as well as its related contextual conditions (often associated with medicine or law). 7. Clinical Observation: observation and feedback for teaching and evaluating medical student communication skills between trainee physician and patient may involve role plays or actual trainee-patient interactions. 8. Concept Map: a type of graphic organizer that can used to organize and represent knowledge of a subject. Concept maps begin with a main idea (or concept) and then branch out to show how that main idea can be broken down into specific topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikis in Libraries Matthew M
    Wikis in Libraries Matthew M. Bejune Wikis have recently been adopted to support a variety of a type of Web site that allows the visitors to add, collaborative activities within libraries. This article and remove, edit, and change some content, typically with­ out the need for registration. It also allows for linking its companion wiki, LibraryWikis (http://librarywikis. among any number of pages. This ease of interaction pbwiki.com/), seek to document the phenomenon of wikis and operation makes a wiki an effective tool for mass in libraries. This subject is considered within the frame- collaborative authoring. work of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). Wikis have been around since the mid­1990s, though it The author identified thirty-three library wikis and is only recently that they have become ubiquitous. In 1995, Ward Cunningham launched the first wiki, WikiWikiWeb developed a classification schema with four categories: (1) (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki), which is still active today, to collaboration among libraries (45.7 percent); (2) collabo- facilitate the exchange of ideas among computer program­ ration among library staff (31.4 percent); (3) collabora- mers (Wikipedia 2007b). The launch of WikiWikiWeb was tion among library staff and patrons (14.3 percent); and a departure from the existing model of Web communica­ tion ,where there was a clear divide between authors and (4) collaboration among patrons (8.6 percent). Examples readers. WikiWikiWeb elevated the status of readers, if of library wikis are presented within the article, as is a they so chose, to that of content writers and editors. This discussion for why wikis are primarily utilized within model proved popular, and the wiki technology used on categories I and II and not within categories III and IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Onapp Admin Guide
    2.0 Admin Guide 2.0 Admin Guide Contents 0. About This Guide ............................................................................................... 5 1. OnApp Overview ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Servers ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Networks ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Templates .............................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Virtual Machines .................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Scalability .............................................................................................................. 8 1.6 Availability and Reliability .................................................................................... 8 1.7 Security .................................................................................................................. 9 1.8 API and Integration ............................................................................................... 9 2. OnApp Hardware & Software Requirements ................................................. 10 2.1 Hypervisor Servers ............................................................................................. 10 2.2 Control Panel Server ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, It Is the Largest, Fastest-Growing and Most Popular General Reference Work Currently Available on the Internet
    Tomasz „Polimerek” Ganicz Wikimedia Polska WikipediaWikipedia andand otherother WikimediaWikimedia projectsprojects WhatWhat isis Wikipedia?Wikipedia? „Imagine„Imagine aa worldworld inin whichwhich everyevery singlesingle humanhuman beingbeing cancan freelyfreely shareshare inin thethe sumsum ofof allall knowledge.knowledge. That'sThat's ourour commitment.”commitment.” JimmyJimmy „Jimbo”„Jimbo” Wales Wales –– founder founder ofof WikipediaWikipedia As defined by itself: Wikipedia is a free multilingual, open content encyclopedia project operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its name is a blend of the words wiki (a technology for creating collaborative websites) and encyclopedia. Launched in January 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, it is the largest, fastest-growing and most popular general reference work currently available on the Internet. OpenOpen and and free free content content RichardRichard StallmanStallman definition definition of of free free software: software: „The„The wordword "free""free" inin ourour namename doesdoes notnot referrefer toto price;price; itit refersrefers toto freedom.freedom. First,First, thethe freedomfreedom toto copycopy aa programprogram andand redistributeredistribute itit toto youryour neighbors,neighbors, soso thatthat theythey cancan useuse itit asas wellwell asas you.you. Second,Second, thethe freedomfreedom toto changechange aa program,program, soso ththatat youyou cancan controlcontrol itit insteadinstead ofof itit controllingcontrolling you;you; forfor this,this, thethe sourcesource
    [Show full text]
  • Instructor Basics: Howtouse Wikipedia As Ateaching Tool
    Instructor Basics: How to use Wikipedia as a teaching tool Wiki Education Foundation Wikipedia is the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. One of the most visited websites worldwide, Wikipedia is a resource used by most university students. Increasingly, many instructors around the world have used Wikipedia as a teaching tool in their university classrooms as well. In this brochure, we bring together their experiences to help you determine how to use Wikipedia in your classroom. We’ve organized the brochure into three parts: Assignment planning Learn key Wikipedia policies and get more information on designing assignments, with a focus on asking students to write Wikipedia articles for class. During the term Learn about the structure of a good Wikipedia article, the kinds of articles students should choose to improve, suggestions for what to cover in a Wikipedia lab session, and how to interact with the community of Wikipedia editors. After the term See a sample assessment structure that’s worked for other instructors. 2 Instructor Basics Assignment planning Understanding key policies Since Wikipedia started in 2001, the community of volunteer editors – “Wikipedians” – has developed several key policies designed to ensure Wikipedia is as reliable and useful as possible. Any assignment you integrate into your classroom must follow these policies. Understanding these cornerstone policies ensures that you develop an assignment that meets your learning objectives and improves Wikipedia at the same time. Free content Neutral point of view “The work students contribute to “Everything on Wikipedia must be Wikipedia is free content and becomes written from a neutral point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY USE a WIKI? an Introduction to the Latest Online Publishing Format
    WHY USE A WIKI? An Introduction to the Latest Online Publishing Format A WebWorks.com White Paper Author: Alan J. Porter VP-Operations WebWorks.com a brand of Quadralay Corporation [email protected] WW_WP0309_WIKIpub © 2009 – Quadralay Corporation. All rights reserved. NOTE: Please feel free to redistribute this white paper to anyone you feel may benefit. If you would like an electronic copy for distribution, just send an e-mail to [email protected] CONTENTS Overview................................................................................................................................ 2 What is a Wiki? ...................................................................................................................... 2 Open Editing = Collaborative Authoring .................................................................................. 3 Wikis in More Detail................................................................................................................ 3 Wikis Are Everywhere ............................................................................................................ 4 Why Use a Wiki...................................................................................................................... 5 Getting People to Use Wikis ................................................................................................... 8 Populating the Wiki................................................................................................................. 9 WebWorks ePublisher and Wikis
    [Show full text]
  • Metrics That Matter Social Software for Business Performance Metrics That Matter
    Metrics that Matter Social Software for Business Performance Metrics that Matter Contents Introduction: When will social software prove itself? | 1 Current approaches to social software will likely fail | 2 Creating and retaining leaders | 3 Social software is essential to meet the challenge of constant change | 6 Extreme performance improvement is achievable | 9 Companies must focus to move the needle on business performance | 12 Long-term benefits of social software are transformative | 20 Conclusion: Social software is worth your time | 23 Appendix | 24 Note: Social software tools considered in this paper include wikis, blogs, microblogs, discussion forums, social networks, social book- marks, tagging, crowdsourcing, and prediction markets. Only internal-facing solutions (Socialcast, Socialtext, Traction, etc.) were in scope, excluding their external-facing equivalents (Twitter, Facebook, etc.). Social Software for Business Performance Introduction: When will social software prove itself? ENIOR executives are skeptical of the that business performance improvements are Svalue of social software. Their reluctance is possible: OSIsoft1 realized a 22% improvement understandable but self-defeating. Social soft- in average time to issue resolution through ware has the potential to address operational the customer support team’s use of Socialtext2 “pain points” and significantly wikis. Alcoa Fastening enhance business perfor- Systems3 experienced a 61% mance in the short–term and reduction in time spent transform it in the long–term. Companies that on compliance activities Companies that embrace embrace this through the use of Traction this opportunity will have a opportunity will Software.4 Both companies distinct advantage over their have a distinct believe these improvements competitors; skeptics will would have been impossible likely finish last.
    [Show full text]