Tetrazepam Allergy: a Case Series of Cutaneous Adverse Events

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tetrazepam Allergy: a Case Series of Cutaneous Adverse Events Acta Derm Venereol 2016; 96: 110–111 SHORT COMMUNICATION Tetrazepam Allergy: A Case Series of Cutaneous Adverse Events Inga Huseynov, Mirja Wirtz and Nicolas Hunzelmann Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Cologne, DTZ-West, Kerpener Straße 62, DE-50937 Köln, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted May 11, 2015; Epub ahead of print May 27, 2015 Tetrazepam has been widely used in clinical praxis in many Table I. Overview of patch- and prick-testing with tetrazepam and countries for over 50 years (1). As an agent belonging to diazepam in 8 patients with drug allergy to tetrazepam the class of benzodiazepines, it has an immediate sedative, Pat. Sex/age, Prick- Patch-test Patch-test muscle relaxing, anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effect. Ac- No. years Symptoms test (tetrazepam) (diazepam) cording to the German drug prescription report for 2012, 1 F/66 EME – Pos. at D2 Not done tetrazepam was the most commonly prescribed muscle 2 F/45 Exanthemaa – Pos. at D2 Not done relaxant after botulinum toxin (2). Common adverse 3 F/47 Exanthemaa – Pos. at D3 Not done 4 F/65 Exanthemaa – Pos. at D2 Not done reactions following systemic intake are of neurological 5 M/75 ME (see Fig. S21) – Pos. at D4 Not done and gastrointestinal nature, while cutaneous reactions to 6 M/48 Exanthemaa – Pos. at D3 Not done tetrazepam are very rare, with only a few cases reported 7 M/42 ME – Pos. at D2 Not done in the literature. It has nevertheless to be assumed that 8 F/49 Exanthema – Pos. at D2 Negative only a minority of cases is reported. The accumulation of aNot further specified exanthema. these adverse reactions in comparison with other muscle EME: erythema-multiforme-like exanthema; ME: maculopapular exanthema; relaxing drugs led the European Commission to suspend Pos.: positive; D2, D3, D4: days after test-application; –: negative. For further detailed information relating to each patient see Tables SI1 and SII1. marketing authorizations of tetrazepam-containing medi- cines across the European Union (EU) in 2013. As shown in Fig. S11, diazepam has great structural homology with To our knowledge, since 2002 16 cases of cutaneous tetrazepam, deviating only at R4 substitution (aromatic adverse effects due to tetrazepam have been published. ring (T) and cyclohexene ring (D)). Although the chemi- In most cases, patch-testing to tetrazepam was a sen- cal structure of these 2 muscle relaxants is very similar, sitive tool to detect hypersensitivity. Because there are with the exception of one report, all other reports failed no standardized testing protocols for tetrazepam, the to demonstrate cross-reactivity (3–5). patch-test concentrations ranged from 1% to 10% in A summary of skin reactions previously reported in pet. or aqua. In several patients skin testing was fol- the literature is shown in Table SI1, including (6) and (7). lowed by oral challenge testing, 5 out 7 re-challenges We retrospectively assessed patient charts in our allergy were positive. These results indicate that patch-testing clinic and identified 8 patients with tetrazepam allergy is a good tool to identify sensitization to tetrazepam. over a period of 10 years (2003–2013). Patch-testing Cross-reaction between tetrazepam and diazepam was had been performed as follows: the crushed tablets were demonstrated only in one case report (9). Most patients diluted with white petrolatum to 10% and applied to the tolerated diazepam despite its great structural similarity skin of the upper back for 48 h using Finn Chambers. to tetrazepam. The limited number of data in this regard Readings were made according to published guidelines has to be considered. Recently in healthcare workers, (8). The results of skin testing are summarized in Table I. e.g. via crushing of drug tablets to improve drug swal- A summary of the clinical data is available in Table SII1. lowing, airborne contact dermatitis and cross-reaction The patients in this case series are presented, in most between tetrazepam and benzodiazepines has been cases, as mild cutaneous reactions. Only one case pre- observed repeatedly (10, 11). sented as an erythema multiforme-like exanthema. In all Due to the withdrawal of tetrazepam, and only one patients skin reactions subsided without sequelae after case of documented cross-reactivity to diazepam, removal of the drug. Type IV sensitization to tetraze- physicians could take other benzodiazepine-derivates pam could be detected in all patients. Tests (prick and into therapeutic consideration. It remains to be seen patch) related to concomitant medication used at the whether skin testing and oral challenge test to other same time as tetrazepam showed no positive reactions, benzodiazepines derivates should be conducted prior suggesting that the observed skin reactions were very to applying these alternative treatment options. likely caused by tetrazepam. In addition, in one patient The authors declare no conflicts of interest. patch-testing of diazepam and in one patient oral chal- lenge to lorazepam were negative. REFERENCES 1. Behles C, Rotthauwe J. Nutzen-Risiko-Verhältnis von Te- 1http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/?doi=10.2340/00015555-2147 trazepam, Bulletin zur Arzneimittelsicherheit 3. Available Acta Derm Venereol 96 © 2016 The Authors. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2147 Journal Compilation © 2016 Acta Dermato-Venereologica. ISSN 0001-5555 Short communication 111 from http://www.bfarm.de/SharedDocs/1_Downloads/DE/ Clin Immunol 2007; 17: 202–206. BfArM/publ/bulletin/2013/2- 2013.pdf. 7. Sanchez-Morillas L, Laguna-Martinez J, Reano-Martos 2. Schwabe U, Paffrath D. Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2012. M, Rojo-Andres E, Gomez-Tembleque Ubeda P. Systemic Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. dermatitis due to tetrazepam. J Investig Allergol Clin Im- 3. Pirker C, Misic A, Brinkmeier T, Frosch P. Tetrazepam munol 2008; 18: 404–406. drug sensitivity – usefullness of the patch test. Contact 8. Bourke J, Coulson I, English J. Guidelines for the manage- Dermatitis 2002; 47: 135–138. ment of contact dermatitis:an update. Br J Dermatol 2009; 4. Barbaud A, Girault P-Y, Schmutz J, Weber-Muller F, 160: 946–954. Trechot P. No cross-reactions between tetrazepam and other 9. Kämpgen E, Bürger T, Bröcker E-B, Klein E. Cross-reactive benzodiazepines: a possible chemical explanation. Contact type IV hypersensitivity reactions to benzodiazepines revea- Dermatitis 2009; 61: 53–56. led by patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 356–357. 5. Martinez-Tadeo J, Perez-Rodriguez E, Hernandez-Santana, 10. Landeck L, Skudlik C, John SM. Airborne contact derma- G, de la Torre-Morin F. Anaphylaxis caused by tetrazepam titis to tetrazepam in geriatric nurses – a report of 10 cases. without cross-reactivity with other benzodiazepines. Ann Eur J Dermatol 2012; 26: 680–684. Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012; 108: 284–285. 11. Swinnen I, Ghys K, Kerre S, Constandt L, Goossens A. Oc- 6. Cabrerizo Ballesteros S, Mendez Alcalde J, Sanchez Alonso cupational airborne contact dermatitis from benzodiazepi- A. Erythema multiforme to Tetrazepam. J Investig Allergol nes and other drugs. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 70: 227–232. Acta Derm Venereol 96.
Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for the Forensic Analysis of Drugs Facilitating Sexual Assault and Other Criminal Acts
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidelines for the Forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts United Nations publication Printed in Austria ST/NAR/45 *1186331*V.11-86331—December 2011 —300 Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library, iStock.com/Abel Mitja Varela Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidelines for the forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 ST/NAR/45 © United Nations, December 2011. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. List of abbreviations . v Acknowledgements .......................................... vii 1. Introduction............................................. 1 1.1. Background ........................................ 1 1.2. Purpose and scope of the manual ...................... 2 2. Investigative and analytical challenges ....................... 5 3 Evidence collection ...................................... 9 3.1. Evidence collection kits .............................. 9 3.2. Sample transfer and storage........................... 10 3.3. Biological samples and sampling ...................... 11 3.4. Other samples ...................................... 12 4. Analytical considerations .................................. 13 4.1. Substances encountered in DFSA and other DFC cases .... 13 4.2. Procedures and analytical strategy...................... 14 4.3. Analytical methodology .............................. 15 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Benzodiazepines in Chronic Pain Why the Interest?
    Why the Interest? • 33 years in chronic pain rehabilitation Benzodiazepines • Many patients are dysfunctional, depressed, in Chronic Pain regressed, and cognitively impaired while taking opioids plus benzodiazepines. • Engendered a negative attitude Edward Covington, MD • Stimulated curiosity about what we Cleveland Clinic Foundation do and do not know about these drugs in pain patients, especially in combination with opioids Disclaimer History Much of the data that I could find is quite old • For centuries, humans have sought anxiolysis, euphoria • Alcohol was followed by sedatives and anxiolytics • 19th century – Bromides (“take a powder”), choral hydrate (Mickey Finn), paraldehyde • Barbiturates synthesized in 1903 • Meprobamate in 1950 Benzodiazepine Introduction Benzodiazepine Use in America • Chlordiazepoxide introduced in 1960 • BZs are the most prescribed CNS depressants • Addictiveness and lethality of barbiturates (and similar drugs) led to their replacement by BZs • Estimated past year prevalence of BZ use in • Use of BZs increased dramatically the USA = 12.9% – US sales peaked in 1975 – Anxiolytics / hypnotics accounted for 10% of all • 14.2% of these have taken the drug ≥ 12 mo prescriptions Barker MJ et al. Arch Clin Neuropsychology 2004;19:437-454 • WHO recommended scheduling BZs in the early • About 100 million prescriptions in 1999 1980s DEA Lader, M: J Subs Abuse Treatment 1991;8:53-59 1 Mechanism of Tranquilization How Reinforcing are BZs? - • GABA binding permits Cl influx Humans • Hyperpolarizes cell, •Normal (light
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Federal Scheduling Actions
    TED SAKAI NEIL ABERCROMBIE DIRECTOR GOVERNOR Martha Torney Deputy Director Administration Max Otani Deputy Director Corrections Shawn Tsuha STATE OF HAWAII Deputy Director NARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT Law Enforcement DIVISION Department of Public Safety No. Posted at LT Gov office 3375 Koapaka Street, Suite D-100 3-5-14 Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 March 5, 2014 NOTICE OF FEDERAL SCHEDULING ACTIONS Section 329-11(d) states that if a substance is added, deleted or rescheduled under federal law and notice of the designation is given to the department then the department shall recommend to the legislature that a corresponding change in Hawaii law be made. The Department was given notice that the following depressant drug was placed into Schedule IV by the Federal Government: Alfaxalone 5[alpha]-pregnan-3[alpha]-ol-11,20-dione, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers On February 27, 2914 the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) placed the substance Alfaxalone 5[alpha]-pregnan-3[alpha]-ol-11,20-dione, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers into schedule IV of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This scheduling action is pursuant to the CSA which requires that such actions be made on the record after opportunity for a hearing through formal rulemaking. This action imposes the regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to schedule IV controlled substances on persons who handle (manufacture, distribute, dispense, import, export, engage in research, conduct instructional activities with, or possess) or propose to handle Alfaxalone. Section 329-20, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: §329-20 Schedule IV.
    [Show full text]
  • 124.210 Schedule IV — Substances Included. 1
    1 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, §124.210 124.210 Schedule IV — substances included. 1. Schedule IV shall consist of the drugs and other substances, by whatever official name, common or usual name, chemical name, or brand name designated, listed in this section. 2. Narcotic drugs. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing any of the following narcotic drugs, or their salts calculated as the free anhydrous base or alkaloid, in limited quantities as set forth below: a. Not more than one milligram of difenoxin and not less than twenty-five micrograms of atropine sulfate per dosage unit. b. Dextropropoxyphene (alpha-(+)-4-dimethylamino-1,2-diphenyl-3-methyl-2- propionoxybutane). c. 2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexanol, its salts, optical and geometric isomers and salts of these isomers (including tramadol). 3. Depressants. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation: a. Alprazolam. b. Barbital. c. Bromazepam. d. Camazepam. e. Carisoprodol. f. Chloral betaine. g. Chloral hydrate. h. Chlordiazepoxide. i. Clobazam. j. Clonazepam. k. Clorazepate. l. Clotiazepam. m. Cloxazolam. n. Delorazepam. o. Diazepam. p. Dichloralphenazone. q. Estazolam. r. Ethchlorvynol. s. Ethinamate. t. Ethyl Loflazepate. u. Fludiazepam. v. Flunitrazepam. w. Flurazepam. x. Halazepam. y. Haloxazolam. z. Ketazolam. aa. Loprazolam. ab. Lorazepam. ac. Lormetazepam. ad. Mebutamate. ae. Medazepam. af. Meprobamate. ag. Methohexital. ah. Methylphenobarbital (mephobarbital).
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrazepam-Containing Medicines Suspended Across the EU (PDF
    29 May 2013 EMA/402567/2013 – Rev 1 Tetrazepam-containing medicines suspended across the EU On 24 April 2013, following the recommendation by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC), the Co-ordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures – Human (CMDh) endorsed by majority the PRAC recommendation to suspend the marketing authorisations of tetrazepam-containing medicines across the European Union (EU). The CMDh, a body representing EU Member States, is responsible for ensuring harmonised safety standards for medicines authorised via national marketing authorisation procedures across the EU. Tetrazepam, a medicine of the benzodiazepine class, is used in several EU Member States to treat painful contractures (such as in low back pain and neck pain) and spasticity (excessive stiffness of muscles). The review of tetrazepam was triggered by the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicine and Health Products (ANSM), following reports of serious skin reactions with this medicine in France. Having assessed all available data on the risk of skin reactions, including post-marketing data in the EU and the published literature, the PRAC concluded that tetrazepam is associated with a low but increased risk of serious skin reactions (including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and DRESS syndrome) compared with other benzodiazepines. The Committee also noted that, in the light of the risks identified, the available data on the effectiveness of tetrazepam were not sufficiently robust to support its use in the authorised indications. The CMDh agreed with the PRAC conclusion that the benefits of these medicines do not outweigh their risks, and adopted a final position that the marketing authorisations should be suspended throughout the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Benzodiazepines in Oral Fluid Using LC/MS/MS
    Determination of Benzodiazepines in Oral Fluid Using LC/MS/MS Application Note Forensic Toxicology Authors Introduction Christine Moore, Cynthia Coulter, and Katherine Crompton Benzodiazepines are the most commonly pre- Immunalysis Corporation scribed class of drugs in the USA for the treatment 829 Towne Center Drive of anxiety and insomnia, particularly in the elderly Pomona, CA 91767 [1]. They are also used as muscle relaxants and USA anticonvulsants. They are commonly detected in incidents of driving under the influence of drugs Michael Zumwalt (DUID), often in combination with other medica- Agilent Technologies, Inc. tions [2,3]. Oral fluid is becoming increasingly used 9780 S. Meridian Blvd. as a specimen in many areas of forensic interest, Englewood, CO 80112 including collection at the roadside during traffic USA stops. Its ease of collection, difficulty of adulteration, and applicability to routine testing Abstract has promoted its use as a valid test specimen. However, the detection of benzodiazepines in particular in oral fluid is not without difficulty A rapid, simple, highly sensitive procedure for the simul- since the saliva:plasma ratio for most of the drug taneous analysis of 14 benzodiazepines in oral fluid, using class is low. the Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (QQQ) in electrospray mode, is described. Sample prepa- One of the main issues with the quantitation of ration includes solid-phase extraction, evaporation of the drugs in oral fluid is the difficulty of collection in final eluent to dryness, and reconstitution in mobile phase terms of specimen volume. Many of the currently for injection into the LC/MS/MS system.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Narcotic Substances Circulation of Which Is Restricted in Uzbekistan
    List of narcotic substances circulation of which is restricted in Uzbekistan 1. 2C-B(4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine) 2. 3-methylfentanyl 3. 3-methylthiofentanyl 4. 3-Monoacetylmorphine 5. 4-methylaminorex 6. 6- Monoacetylmorphine 7. Acetorphine 8. Acetyl Dihydrocodeine 9. Acetyl-alfametilfentanil 10. Acetylated opium 11. Acetylcodeine 12. Acetylmethadol 13. Alfametadol 14. Alfatsetilmetadol 15. all fungi that contain Psilocine and Psilocybine 16. Allylprodine 17. Alpha Methylfentanyl 18. Alpha Metiltiofentanil 19. Alphaprodine 20. Anileridin 21. Benzethidine 22. Benzylmorphine 23. Betacetylmethadol 24. Betahydroxyfentanyl 25. Betameprodine 26. Betamethadol 27. Betaprodine 28. Bezitramide 29. Cannabis oil (hashish oil) 30. Cannabis, marihuana 31. Cathine ((+)-norpseudoephedrine) 32. Cathinone (l-alpha-aminopropiofenon) 33. Clonitazene 34. Cocaine 35. Codoxime 36. d- Methadone 37. DB [L-(3,4 - methylenedioxyphenyl) -2 butanamine] 38. Desmethylprodine; MPPP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine) 39. Desomorphine 40. DET (N,N-diethyltryptamine) 41. Dexamphetamine 42. Diampromide 43. Diethyl phosphate 44. Diethylthiambutene 45. Dihydromorphine 46. Dimenoxadol 47. Dimepheptanol 48. Dimethylthiambutene 49. Dioxaphetyl butyrate 50. Diphenoxine 51. Dipipanone 52. DMA (2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine) 53. DMGP (dimetilgeptilpiran) 54. DMT (dimethyltryptamine) 55. DOB (d, L-2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromo-amphetamine) 56. DOC (d, L-2,5-dimethoxy-4-chloro-amphetamine) 57. DOET (2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine) 58. Drotebanol 59. Ecgonine 60. Ephedrone 61. Ethylmethylthiambutene 62. Eticyclidine 63. Etonitazene 64. Etorphine 65. Etoxeridine 66. Etryptamine 67. Furethidine 68. Hashish (Anasha, cannabis resin) 69. Heroin (Diacetylmorphine) 70. Hydrocodone 71. Hydrocodone phosphate 72. Hydromorphinol 73. Hydromorphone 74. Isomethadone 75. Ketobemidone 76. Khat 77. L- Methadone 78. Levomethorphan 79. Levomoramide 80. Levophenacylmorphan 81. Levorphanol 82. Lysergic acid and its preparations, that include d-Lysergide (LSD, LSD-25) 83.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Evidence of Use and Harms of Novel Benzodiazepines
    ACMD Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Novel Benzodiazepines A review of the evidence of use and harms of Novel Benzodiazepines April 2020 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Legal control of benzodiazepines .......................................................................................... 4 3. Benzodiazepine chemistry and pharmacology .................................................................. 6 4. Benzodiazepine misuse............................................................................................................ 7 Benzodiazepine use with opioids ................................................................................................... 9 Social harms of benzodiazepine use .......................................................................................... 10 Suicide ............................................................................................................................................. 11 5. Prevalence and harm summaries of Novel Benzodiazepines ...................................... 11 1. Flualprazolam ......................................................................................................................... 11 2. Norfludiazepam ....................................................................................................................... 13 3. Flunitrazolam ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A. Schedule IV Shall Consist Of
    1 REVISOR 6800.4240 6800.4240 SCHEDULE IV CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. The following items are listed in Schedule IV: A. Schedule IV shall consist of the drugs and other substances, by whatever official name, common or usual name, chemical name, or brand name designated, listed in this part. B. Narcotic drugs. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing any of the following narcotic drugs, or their salts calculated as the free anhydrous base or alkaloid, in limited quantities as follows: (1) Not more than one milligram of difenoxin and not less than 25 micrograms of atropine sulfate per dosage unit. (2) Dextropropoxyphene (alpha-(+)-4-dimethylamino-1,2-diphenyl-3-methyl-2- propionoxybutane), for example, Darvon, Darvocet. C. Depressants. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation: Statutory Name Some examples of common names, trade names, or names of products which contain a controlled substance (1) Alprazolam Xanax (2) Barbital Barbitone (3) Bromazepam (4) Camazepam (5) Chloral betaine Beta-Chlor (6) Chloral hydrate Noctec, Somnos (7) Chlordiazepoxide Librium, Libritabs (8) Clobazam (9) Clonazepam Clonopin (10) Clorazepate Tranxene (11) Clotiazepam Copyright ©2013
    [Show full text]
  • 3713S.03F Senate Substitute
    3713S.03F SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 523 AN ACT To repeal sections 195.015, 195.017, 579.065, and 579.068, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof five new sections relating to controlled substances, with existing penalty provisions. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section A. Sections 195.015, 195.017, 579.065, and 579.068, 2 RSMo, are repealed and five new sections enacted in lieu thereof, 3 to be known as sections 195.015, 195.017, 195.805, 579.065, and 4 579.068, to read as follows: 5 195.015. 1. The department of health and senior services 6 shall administer this chapter and may add substances to the 7 schedules after public notice and hearing. In making a 8 determination regarding a substance, the department of health and 9 senior services shall consider the following: 10 (1) The actual or relative potential for abuse; 11 (2) The scientific evidence of its pharmacological effect, 12 if known; 13 (3) The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the 14 substance; 15 (4) The history and current pattern of abuse; 16 (5) The scope, duration, and significance of abuse; 1 1 (6) The risk to the public health; 2 (7) The potential of the substance to produce psychic or 3 physiological dependence liability; and 4 (8) Whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a 5 substance already controlled under this chapter. 6 2. After considering the factors enumerated in subsection 1 7 of this section the department of health and senior services 8 shall make findings with respect thereto and issue a rule 9 controlling the substance if it finds the substance has a 10 potential for abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws 2021, LB236, § 4
    LB236 LB236 2021 2021 LEGISLATIVE BILL 236 Approved by the Governor May 26, 2021 Introduced by Brewer, 43; Clements, 2; Erdman, 47; Slama, 1; Lindstrom, 18; Murman, 38; Halloran, 33; Hansen, B., 16; McDonnell, 5; Briese, 41; Lowe, 37; Groene, 42; Sanders, 45; Bostelman, 23; Albrecht, 17; Dorn, 30; Linehan, 39; Friesen, 34; Aguilar, 35; Gragert, 40; Kolterman, 24; Williams, 36; Brandt, 32. A BILL FOR AN ACT relating to law; to amend sections 28-1202 and 69-2436, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, and sections 28-401 and 28-405, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2020; to redefine terms, change drug schedules, and adopt federal drug provisions under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act; to provide an exception to the offense of carrying a concealed weapon as prescribed; to define a term; to change provisions relating to renewal of a permit to carry a concealed handgun; to provide a duty for the Nebraska State Patrol; to eliminate an obsolete provision; to harmonize provisions; and to repeal the original sections. Be it enacted by the people of the State of Nebraska, Section 1. Section 28-401, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2020, is amended to read: 28-401 As used in the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) Administer means to directly apply a controlled substance by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means to the body of a patient or research subject; (2) Agent means an authorized person who acts on behalf of or at the direction of another person but does not include a common or contract carrier, public warehouse keeper, or employee of a carrier or warehouse keeper; (3) Administration means the Drug Enforcement Administration of the United States Department of Justice; (4) Controlled substance means a drug, biological, substance, or immediate precursor in Schedules I through V of section 28-405.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Mining: Pharmacovigilance Signals of Benzodiazepines and Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
    PS-026 DATA MINING: PHARMACOVIGILANCE SIGNALS OF BENZODIAZEPINES AND SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE DISORDERS Beatriz Proy Vega, Joaquín Jordán Bueso, Patricia Araque Arroyo, José Luis Sánchez Serrano, Natalia Andrés Navarro, Juan Carlos Valenzuela Gámez HG La Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan (Ciudad Real, Spain) BACKGROUND Pharmacovigilance uses data mining algorithms on spontaneous reporting databases, to assess significant associations between adverse drug reactions (ADR) and drugs. These pharmacovigilance databases provide early warnings of hazards that were missed before marketing a drug, mainly because of the limitations of clinical trials. In July 2013, tetrazepam marketing was suspended, after four decades in the market, due to serious skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders ADR (SSTD-ADR). PURPOSE We tried to detect possible pharmacovigilance signals between SSTD-ADR and benzodiazepines, by applying data mining on American Pharmacovigilance Database (FAERS), whose data were public. MATERIAL & METHODS RESULTS We calculated data mining algorithms (PRR: Proportional We found 3,957 SSTD-ADR (3.05% of all benzodiazepines ADR Reporting Ratio; ROR: Reporting Odd Ratio; IC: reports). ROR yielded signals for eight drugs (clobazam, Information Component, and EBGM: Empiric Bayesian clonazepam, clorazepate, midazolam, oxazepam, quazepam, Geometric Mean) on spontaneous reports of SSTD-ADR tetrazepam and triazolam), PRR and IC for four (clobazam, due to benzodiazepines commercialized in USA, midazolam, quazepam and tretrazepam), while EBGM detected only registered into FAERS. All statistical algorithms were a signal for tetrazepam. calculated from 2x2 contingency tables, according to Midazolam, Clobazam and Quazepam originated a signal by 3 literature: PRR – 1.96SE (standar error) (with Chi2 and P algorithms. Tetrazepam was the only which generated a signal by 4 value associated), ROR – 1.96SE, IC – 2SD (standar algorithms.
    [Show full text]