On the Integration of Electromagnetic Railguns with Warship Electric Power Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Integration of Electromagnetic Railguns with Warship Electric Power Systems On the integration of electromagnetic railguns with warship electric power systems Ian Whitelegg A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Mechanical Engineering University College London 2016 1 Statement of originality Statement of originality I, Ian Whitelegg confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Ian Whitelegg University College London DATE: Signed: 2 Abstract Abstract Electromagnetic railguns have reached levels of maturity whereby they are now being considered for installation on warships. A critical review of previous research in this field has highlighted the potential adverse impact that electromagnetic railguns may have on the supply quality of electric power systems. Currently, there is limited collective knowledge of this impact particularly when configured in a topology representative of a candidate warship. This research explores the impact of electromagnetic railguns on a candidate warship electric power system. This research employs a validated gas turbine alternator model of the Rolls-Royce MT30 capable of assessing performance when powering an electromagnetic railgun. A novel control circuit to interface the electromagnetic railgun with the gas turbine alternator and control the rate of fire was developed. A mathematical analysis of the system was then undertaken to understand the challenges in greater detail. A system model was then developed to explore the transient and harmonic impact of electromagnetic railgun firing on the warship electric power system using time-domain simulations. The key finding of this research is that the current practice of warship electric power system design is not robust enough to withstand electromagnetic railgun operations and that under-voltage, under-frequency, over-frequency and excessive waveform distortion result due to the high power demand of the electromagnetic railgun. To mitigate these consequences it is recommended that firing constraints be placed on the electromagnetic railgun and the maximum waveform distortion at the high voltage bus be limited to 8% total harmonic distortion. Failure to adhere to the recommended limits may result in the mal-operation, reduced efficiency and reduced life expectancy of the electric power system. 3 Dedications Dedications To my parents, who believed studying electrical engineering was a good bet. 4 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Sophia, for three years of unwavering support throughout this most selfish act. Thank you. My primary supervisor and mentor Professor Bucknall whose guidance, patience and encouragement made the completion of this thesis a reality. Frequently challenged, too frequently perhaps, yet rarely mistaken. My secondary supervisor Professor Wrobel, for keeping the grease on the wheels, the penny pinchers at bay and for always fighting my corner throughout my time at UCL. Mark Selfridge for instilling in me levels of professionalism and self-discipline that I will continue to develop and carry with me throughout my engineering career. I could not have wished for a better start. Ben Thorp and Paul Hannawi from Rolls-Royce for answering endless questions, emails and phone calls without ever showing a moments frustration. Perhaps most importantly, for taking the risk and having the trust and belief that I would return their faith and support with something useful. Bernard Twomey from Lloyd’s Register and Konrad Yearwood from Transport for London for giving up their own time to discuss ideas, review my research and proof read this thesis. Dr Nick Bradbeer, Lucy Collins, Andrea Grech La Rosa, Dr Rachel Pawling and the guy who comes in and wanders about who isn’t a marine engineer, can’t remember his name. All have provided me a stimulating, supportive and humorous place to work over the past three years. You embody UCL. Colin Wormald, for almost always being there when I have needed him. I guess it’s time to head for the hills. My family and friends. The Big5, a philosophy in itself. 5 Contents Contents On the integration of electromagnetic railguns with warship electric power systems 1 Statement of originality 2 Abstract 3 Dedications 4 Acknowledgements 5 Contents 6 List of figures 12 List of tables 19 Nomenclature 21 Abbreviations 26 Chapter 1 Introduction 28 1.1 Motivation 28 1.2 Research aims 30 1.3 Thesis outline 31 1.4 Research contributions 32 1.5 Contributions to the literature 33 6 Contents Chapter 2 Literature review 34 2.1 Introduction 34 2.2 A review of electric warships 34 2.2.1 A historical review of electric warships 35 2.2.2 The state-of-the-art in warship electric power system technology 35 2.2.3 A review of QPS standards 43 2.3 A review of EM railguns 46 2.3.1 Potential EM railgun ESDs 48 2.3.2 Pulsed loads in parallel industries 50 2.4 A critical review of integrating EM railguns with warship power systems 51 2.5 Summary 62 Chapter 3 Problem formulation 67 3.1 Introduction 67 3.2 EM railgun system concept of operation 68 3.3 The impact of EM railgun operation on QPS 70 3.3.1 Generator AVR 71 3.3.2 Generator governor 74 3.4 Electrically integrating EM railguns with warship electric power systems 75 3.4.1 Thyristor rectifier charging control bridge characteristics 80 3.4.2 ESD capacitor load characteristics 86 3.4.3 Control relationships between warship electric power system and EM railgun 87 3.5 Electric warship QPS considerations in the context of EM railgun operation 88 3.6 Summary 89 Chapter 4 Modelling 90 7 Contents 4.1 Introduction 90 4.2 Software selection 91 4.3 Warship electric power system performance tool 91 4.3.1 Modelling purpose 91 4.3.2 Modelling requirement 92 4.3.3 Modelling assumptions and limitations 93 4.3.4 Performance tool system diagram 94 4.4 Gas turbine alternator model 95 4.4.1 Gas turbine and governor model 95 4.4.2 Synchronous alternator model 97 4.4.3 AVR model 105 4.4.4 GTA model parameter selection 106 4.4.5 GTA model limitations 108 4.5 EM railgun ESD charging circuit model 109 4.5.1 Six-pulse thyristor rectifier and pulse generator model 109 4.5.2 EM railgun ESD charging circuit controller 110 4.5.3 EM railgun ESD charging circuit model limitations 112 4.6 EM railgun ESD model 112 4.6.1 EM railgun ESD model parameter selection 113 4.6.2 EM railgun ESD model limitations 114 4.7 Electric power transmission system model 114 4.7.1 Generator and EM railgun cable model 115 4.7.2 Isolation transformer model 115 4.7.3 Electric power transmission system model limitations 116 4.8 Validation and verification 116 4.8.1 GTA model validation 117 8 Contents 4.8.2 EM railgun ESD charging circuit model verification 120 4.8.3 EM railgun ESD model verification 122 4.8.4 Electric power transmission system model verification 123 4.9 Summary 123 Chapter 5 Results 125 5.1 Introduction 125 5.2 Investigation justification 126 5.3 Single shot firing 128 5.3.1 Investigation description 129 5.3.2 Single shot firing investigation results 130 5.3.3 Single shot case study 133 5.3.4 Single shot firing results summary 137 5.4 Continuous firing 138 5.4.1 Investigation description 139 5.4.2 Continuous firing investigation results 142 5.4.3 Continuous firing case study 144 5.4.4 Exploring the limits of continuous firing 155 5.4.5 Continuous firing results summary 159 5.5 Summary 160 Chapter 6 Discussion 162 6.1 Introduction 162 6.2 Transient impact 163 6.2.1 Results 163 6.2.2 Consequences 167 9 Contents 6.2.3 Mitigations 169 6.3 Harmonic impact 171 6.3.1 Harmonic analysis 172 6.3.2 Harmonic impact on current carrying conductors 174 6.3.3 Harmonic impact on machines comprising iron cores 176 6.3.4 Harmonic impact on power cables 177 6.3.5 Harmonic impact summary 178 6.3.6 Results 178 6.3.7 Consequences 186 6.3.8 Mitigations 194 6.4 Harmonic filter design process 200 6.4.1 Ascertain harmonics to be targeted 200 6.4.2 Determine the reactive power requirement of the harmonic source 202 6.4.3 Define required filter bandwidth 203 6.4.4 Calculate filter component values 204 6.4.5 Harmonic filter design response and summary 205 6.5 Power system performance with the 5th harmonic attenuated 206 6.5.1 Harmonic filter connection to the main bus 207 6.5.2 Harmonic filter response examination 208 6.5.3 Impact of attenuating the 5th harmonic during EM railgun operations on power system performance 210 6.5.4 Attenuating the 5th harmonic in the context of the generator capability diagram 216 6.5.5 Summary 218 6.6 Concluding arguments and system solution recommendation 219 6.6.1 Concluding arguments 220 6.6.2 System solution recommendation 222 10 Contents Chapter 7 Conclusions and further work 223 7.1 Introduction 223 7.2 Summary of the research findings 224 7.3 Recommendations for the naval design authority 226 7.4 Recommendations for further work 227 7.4.1 Modification of GTA load shed logic 227 7.4.2 Mechanical and thermal impact on the GTA during EM railgun firing 227 7.4.3 Further develop ESD charging bridge controller 228 7.4.4 Explore alternative power converters to charge the EM railgun ESD 228 References 230 Appendix A Six-pulse thyristor rectifier waveforms 241 Appendix B Software selection 244 Appendix C Simulink model schematics 245 Appendix D Synchronous alternator model equations 251 Appendix E GT and load model validation confirmation letter from Rolls-Royce 252 Appendix F Synchronous alternator data sheet 254 Appendix G Cable model parameter calculations 259 Appendix H GTA model validation 261 Appendix I Performance tool user guide 266 Appendix
Recommended publications
  • UK Maritime Power
    Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power Fifth Edition Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 (JDP 0-10) (5th Edition), dated October 2017, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Director Concepts and Doctrine Conditions of release 1. This information is Crown copyright. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) exclusively owns the intellectual property rights for this publication. You are not to forward, reprint, copy, distribute, reproduce, store in a retrieval system, or transmit its information outside the MOD without VCDS’ permission. 2. This information may be subject to privately owned rights. i Authorisation The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) is responsible for publishing strategic trends, joint concepts and doctrine. If you wish to quote our publications as reference material in other work, you should confirm with our editors whether the particular publication and amendment state remains authoritative. We welcome your comments on factual accuracy or amendment proposals. Please send them to: The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Ministry of Defence Shrivenham SWINDON Wiltshire SN6 8RF Telephone: 01793 31 4216/4217/4220 Military network: 96161 4216/4217/4220 E-mail: [email protected] All images, or otherwise stated are: © Crown copyright/MOD 2017. Distribution Distributing Joint Doctrine Publication (JDP) 0-10 (5th Edition) is managed by the Forms and Publications Section, LCSLS Headquarters and Operations Centre, C16 Site, Ploughley Road, Arncott, Bicester, OX25 1LP. All of our other publications, including a regularly updated DCDC Publications Disk, can also be demanded from the LCSLS Operations Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Musketeer – the 1956 Suez Crisis, RAN Members’ Involvement
    OCCASIONAL PAPER 84 Call the Hands Issue No. 43 July 2020 Operation Musketeer – the 1956 Suez Crisis, RAN Members’ Involvement This paper was written by Society volunteer, Commander Martin Linsley RAN Rtd. Its genesis was a list of the RAN participants in the Suez Crisis compiled by Mike Fogarty a former RAN officer and diplomat. Contributions were also received from participants; Commodore Kelvin Gulliver AM RAN Rtd and Captain Nick Bailey RAN Rtd who were served as junior officers in HMS Newfoundland at the time. One chronicler called it ‘the shortest and silliest war in history’i, but Operation Musketeer, better known as the 1956 Suez Crisis, signified the end of an era and the beginning of a new world order. The conflict focused on the Egyptian owned Suez Canal, and involving a conspiracy orchestrated by France, the UK and Israel. At least 13 members of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) were involved.ii Following the end of WWII, the RAN maintained close links with the UK’s Royal Navy (RN), its parent service. It was common for RAN members, particularly officers, to be posted to the RN for ‘service, training and promotion courses’. The posting was welcomed by many. It began and ended with a 4/5 week’s sea passage travelling first class on a passenger liner. The overseas allowances were good and RAN personnel were the envy of their RN contemporaries. More than one young officer found his future wife during his time in the UK. Four other RAN members serving with the RN in 1956 had been commissioned from the ranks.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations in British Shipbuilding and Large Marine
    Research Organisations in British Shipbuilding and Large Marine Engine Manufacture: 1945-1959 (Part II) Hugh Murphy Cet article fait suite à la première partie, qui traitait de la période 1900 à 1944. Ici, l’auteur étudie l’impact de la British Ship Research Association, de la Parsons Marine Turbine Research and Development Association et, de façon tangentielle, d’un groupe de conseil en recherche privé, le Yarrow Admiralty Research Department (Y-ARD), une filiale de Yarrow Shipbuilders établie dans le district Scotstoun de la rivière Upper Clyde, et le National Physical Laboratory (NPL). Il traite également de William Doxford & Sons, avant d’évaluer l’impact individuel et collectif de ces sociétés jusqu’en 1959, ainsi que la situation générale de la construction navale britannique et la fabrication de gros moteurs maritimes. This article follows on directly from Part 1 covering the period 1900-1944, published in the last issue. Here I examine the impact of the British Ship Research Association (BSRA) and Parsons Marine Turbine Research and Development Association (PAMETRADA). Tangentially I review one private research consultancy cluster, the Yarrow Admiralty Research Department (YARD) an offshoot of Yarrow Shipbuilders, Scotstoun, on the Upper Clyde, and the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). I also consider Wm Doxford & Sons, before assessing their individual and collective impact up to 1959, and the general situation in British shipbuilding and large marine engine manufacture. The Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord, XXX, No. 2 (Summer
    [Show full text]
  • Second World War Roll of Honour
    Second World War roll of honour This document lists the names of former Scouts and Scout Leaders who were killed during the Second World War (1939 – 1945). The names have been compiled from official information gathered at and shortly after the War and from information supplied by several Scout historians. We welcome any names which have not been included and, once verified through the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, will add them to the Roll. We are currently working to cross reference this list with other sources to increase its accuracy. Name Date of Death Other Information RAF. Aged 21 years. Killed on active service, 4th February 1941. 10th Barking Sergeant Bernard T. Abbott 4 February 1941 (Congregational) Group. Army. Aged 21 years. Killed on active service in France, 21 May 1940. 24th Corporal Alan William Ablett 21 May 1940 Gravesend (Meopham) Group. RAF. Aged 22 years. Killed on active service, February 1943. 67th North Sergeant Pilot Gerald Abrey February 1943 London Group. South African Air Force. Aged 23 years. Killed on active service in air crash Jan Leendert Achterberg 14 May 1942 14th May, 1942. 1st Bellevue Group, Johannesburg, Transvaal. Flying Officer William Ward RAF. Aged 25 years. Killed on active service 15 March 1940. Munroe College 15 March 1940 Adam Troop, Ontonio, Jamaica. RAF. Aged 23 years. Died on active service 4th June 1940. 71st Croydon Denis Norman Adams 4 June 1940 Group. Pilot Officer George Redvers RAF. Aged 23 years. Presumed killed in action over Hamburg 10th May 1941. 10 May 1940 Newton Adams 8th Ealing Group. New Zealand Expeditionary Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence: Type 45 Destroyer
    House of Commons Public Accounts Committee Ministry of Defence: Type 45 Destroyer Thirtieth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 June 2009 HC 372 Published on 23 June 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Accounts Committee The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Nigel Griffiths MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Rt Hon Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Geraldine Smith MP (Labour, Morecombe and Lunesdale) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Of Deaths in Service of Royal Naval Medical, Dental, Queen Alexandra's Royal Naval Nursing Service and Sick Berth Staff
    Index of Deaths in Service of Royal Naval Medical, Dental, Queen Alexandra’s Royal Naval Nursing Service and Sick Berth Staff World War II Researched and collated by Eric C Birbeck MVO and Peter J Derby - Haslar Heritage Group. Ranks and Rate abbreviations can be found at the end of this document Name Rank / Off No 1 Date Ship, (Pennant No), Type, Reason for loss and other comrades lost and Rate burial / memorial details (where known). Abel CA SBA SR8625 02/10/1942 HMS Tamar. Hong Kong Naval Base. Drowned, POW (along with many other medical shipmates) onboard SS Lisbon Maru sunk by US Submarine Grouper. 2 Panel 71, Column 2, Plymouth Naval Memorial, Devon, UK. 1 Officers’ official numbers are not shown as they were not recorded on the original documents researched. Where found, notes on awards and medals have been added. 2 Lisbon Maru was a Japanese freighter which was used as a troopship and prisoner-of-war transport between China and Japan. When she was sunk by USS Grouper (SS- 214) on 1 October 1942, she was carrying, in addition to Japanese Army personnel, almost 2,000 British prisoners of war captured after the fall of Hong Kong in December Name Rank / Off No 1 Date Ship, (Pennant No), Type, Reason for loss and other comrades lost and Rate burial / memorial details (where known). Abraham J LSBA M54850 11/03/1942 HMS Naiad (93). Dido-class destroyer. Sunk by U-565 south of Crete. Panel 71, Column 2, Plymouth Naval Memorial, Devon, UK. Abrahams TH LSBA M49905 26/02/1942 HMS Sultan.
    [Show full text]
  • Allies Growing Closer: Japan-Europe Security Ties in the Age of Strategic
    C O R P O R A T I O N JEFFREY W. HORNUNG Allies Growing Closer Japan–Europe Security Ties in the Age of Strategic Competition For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA186-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0636-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Adobe Stock/numax3d; railwayfx. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In its 2018 National Defense Strategy, the United States acknowledged the reemergence of long-term strategic competition with several rivals, including China and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Lndelr Sht S Volume 38 Mcinthly F 5.00
    2003 lndelr sht S Volume 38 McINTHLY f 5.00 I 30 years of lraditional seruice 5/30:35 ARose Blue 12l7r 30 years of Brittany Ferries 1/21 Alsatia 12140,12141* Atran 1/ll Altaskai pakol craft 1/19 Artevelde 4/45 Altmark 5/20 kun 3l5Z A Alwyn Vincent 8/39* Arundle crotle 10121, 12163 A bad day at the office, feature 1 'l /¿8-3 1 Alyssl'tll lfll0 Asama Maru 7|4o.,1111.0 A bouquet of Mersey daffodils (Mersey Special) 9/42 Ambra Fin 12154 Asanius 8/24 A new golden age forthe Maid 6/16-18 America Star 411*, 415, 7 12 Asgard ll 1 l/l 3 A port for the 21st cenluty 9/32-33 Amerian Adventure I 1/22 Asia'12/39' ¿ A. Lopez, screw steamship 5/26 Amerian Bankef Érgo ship 1 l/.l0 Asian Hercules 6/4 Shipping odyssey (Blue Funnel) 8/17 Amerian Range4 ergo ship 1 1/10 Asseburg l/12* Ticket to ride (Mersey Ferries) 6/1 6-20 Americ¡n Star 4/34 Assi Euro Link 4/4 Aütal role 7/20-21 iAmerigo Vespucci 6/54+, 8/30 Assyria 12139 Aasford'l/fc' Amerikanis 9146*,9148 Astoria 1212* AbelTroman 3/18 Amsterdam 2111*, 5130, 5134*, 5135 Astrea 9/52 Abercorn 4/33 Anchises 8/23r,8/24 Astraea 1ll42 Abercraig 8/,14,8.45* Anchor Line's argo vessel op€rations 5116 Asul6 7/40* Aadia 12127 Anchored in the past 5/l'l-17 Asturi$ 1/39 Accra 9/36 Ancon 5/38 Atalante 1f/22 Ae(¡nlury 1212* Ancona 5/7+ Athenia 1/,10, 3146, 5116, 6/50 'Achille lauro 9/47 Andania 12l¡O* Athlone Gstle 12163 Achilles 8/18 AndhikaAdhidaya 9/54* Atlantic 4/30, 1¿128 Adela¡de 11/47 Andrea 8/9 Atlantic convoys rememb€red 60 years on 7/1 3 Admhal Ghbanenko 7/13 Andrew Barker (lpswich) (Excursion Sh¡p SPecial) 6/42 Atlantic lifelines, feature 6/50-53 Admiral Gnier, ro+o 2/29 Andrewl.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy. Karlskrona and Stockholm, 21-23
    Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy Karlskrona and Stockholm, 21-23 October 2008 NIKLAS GRANHOLM (ED.) MICHAEL Codner, ROBert DALSJÖ, NORMAN FRIEDMAN, ERIC GROVE, KARL SÖRENSON, LEE WILLett FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-funded agency under the Ministry of Defence. The core activities are research, method and technology development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 personnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOI Sweden’s largest research institute. FOI gives its customers access to leading-edge expertise in a large number of fields such as security policy studies, defence and security related analyses, the assessment of various types of threat, systems for control and management of crises, protection against and management of hazardous substances, IT security and the potential offered by new sensors. FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency Phone: +46 8 55 50 30 00 www.foi.se FOI-R--2655--SE Base data report Defence Analysis Defence Analysis Fax: +46 8 55 50 31 00 ISSN 1650-1942 December 2008 SE-164 90 Stockholm Michael Codner, Robert Dalsjö, Norman Friedman, Eric Grove, Karl Sörenson and Lee Willett Niklas Granholm (Ed.) Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy Karlskrona and Stockholm, 21-23 October 2008 FOI-R--2655--SE Titel Sex perspektiv på marin strategi. Karlskrona och Stock- holm, 21-23 oktober 2008 Title Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy. Karlskrona & Stock- holm, 21-23 October 2008 Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--2655--SE Rapporttyp Underlagsrapport Report Type Base data report Månad/Month December/December Utgivningsår/Year 2008 Antal sidor/Pages 92 p ISSN ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsmakten Forskningsområde 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2013 the .SU Naval War College
    Naval War College Review Volume 66 Article 21 Number 3 Summer 2013 Summer 2013 The .SU Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation War College, The .SU Naval (2013) "Summer 2013," Naval War College Review: Vol. 66 : No. 3 , Article 21. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol66/iss3/21 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. War College: Summer 2013 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Summer 2013 Volume 66, Number 3 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS 686 Cushing Road Newport, RI 02841-1207 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2013 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 66 [2013], No. 3, Art. 21 N AVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS ADVISORY BOARD PRESIDENT, NAVAL WAR COLLEGE A dam Bellow R ear Adm. John N. Christenson, USN Jeffrey Kline P ROVOST Gale A. Mattox A mb. Mary Ann Peters Robert A. Silano Marin Strmecki DEA N OF NAVAL WARFARE STUDIES Dov S. Zakheim R obert C. Rubel N AVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW EDITORIAL BOARD Carnes Lord, Editor D onald Chisholm Pelham G. Boyer, Managing Editor Audrey Kurth Cronin Phyllis P. Winkler, Book Review Editor Peter Dombrowski Lori A. Almeida, Secretary and Circulation Manager Stephen Downes-Martin Frank Uhlig, Jr., Editor Emeritus Col.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Daring, Destroyer
    HMS Daring, destroyer Naval History Homepage and Site Search SERVICE HISTORIES of ROYAL NAVY WARSHIPS in WORLD WAR 2 by Lt Cdr Geoffrey B Mason RN (Rtd) (c) 2004 HMS DARING (H 16) - D-class Destroyer including Convoy Escort Movements HMS Daring (Navy Photos/Michael Pocock, click to return to Contents List enlarge) D or DEFENDER-Class Fleet Destroyer ordered from John I Thornycroft at Woolston, Southampton in the 1930 Programme. The ship was laid down on 18th June 1931 and launched on 7th April 1932. She was the 5th RN ship to carry the name, introduced in 1801 and previously used by a destroyer sold in 1912. Build was completed on 25th November 1932 for a contract price of £225,536 excluding the Admiralty supplied equipment such as guns, ammunition and communications equipment. She joined the 1st Destroyer Flotilla in the Mediterranean early the next year. The ship re-commissioned in April 1934 after refit at Sheerness.. In December 1934 she sailed to join the 8th Destroyer Flotilla on the China Station and served there until the outbreak of war. Her captain until arrival at Singapore was the renowned Lord Louis Mountbatten. B a t t l e H o n o u r s None H e r a l d i c D a t a Badge: On a Field Black, an arm and a hand in a cresset of fire all Proper. M o t t o Splendide audax : 'Finely daring’ D e t a i l s o f W a r S e r v i c e (for more ship information, go to Naval History Homepage and type name in Site Search) 1 9 3 9 September 3rd Passage to join Fleet at Alexandria with HM Destroyers DUNCAN, DIANA and DAINTY.
    [Show full text]