Understanding Prehistoric Land Use Through Spatial Distribution of Latte Stones in Northern Guam, Mariana Islands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Prehistoric Land Use Through Spatial Distribution of Latte Stones in Northern Guam, Mariana Islands People and Culture in Oceania, 35: 61-84, 2019 Understanding Prehistoric Land Use through Spatial Distribution of Latte Stones in Northern Guam, Mariana Islands Tatsuya Shimasaki* Based on empirical observation, it is traditionally recognized that the prehistoric settlement pattern in the northern part of Guam consists of permanently inhabited villages along the coast and sporadically occupied sites inland. This hypothesis must be confirmed by analysis of substantive archaeological data in order to reconstruct land use patterns of prehistoric society in Guam. In this paper, the spatial distribution of latte stones at different geographical settings in northern Guam is quantified and compared. The latte stone is selected as an analysis target because this distinctive stone’s features might well reflect adherence to a particular place that people chose to utilize intensively during Latte Period (800/1000– 1700CE). As a result, it is shown that latte stones are clustered along the coastal lowlands in contrast to inland, where latte stones are dispersed over a large area. Coastal sites are covered with numerous latte sets at a given site, in contrast to inland sites, which have fewer numbers of latte stones. Thus, the distribution pattern of latte sets is established by its proximity to the shoreline, especially along sandy beaches. This result corresponds with the traditional view of settlement patterns. However, since there are numerous inland sites with latte stones, their functions need to be understood. The results can then be compared with distribution of environmental variables to clarify how the site locations were selected. Keywords: Guam, Mariana Islands, latte stone, Latte Period, archaeology, water source, site distribution, land use, settlement pattern 1. Introduction In the Mariana Islands, the archaeological sites dating to the Latte Period (ca. 800/1000– 1700CE) are numerous and can be easily observed due to the unique stone structures called latte stones, as well as other distinctive artifacts, particularly pottery. Archaeological study of settlement pattern is accepted in Oceania, aimed at identifying behavioral patterns of social and political activities from archaeological remains (Green, 1970: 13). However, the precise settlement pattern * Department of Archaeology and Ethnology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan, Iyo City Board of Education, Ehime, Japan. [e-mail: [email protected]] 62 T. Shimasaki Figure 1. Location and Geology of the Island of Guam (based on Gingerich, 2003) of the Latte Period on an island-wide scale remains unexplained. Still, in the Mariana Islands, many researchers are concerned with the way land was used in prehistory. As humans interact with the natural environment, their behavior seems to display some patterns in relation to those in the natural environment (Jochim, 1981: 3). Hypothesizing that access to a certain resource was an important driving force for human activities of the past society, people of the Latte Period must have had a tendency to inhabit places where the preferred resources were easily available, and such behavior should be reflected in archaeology. This hypothesis could be tested through a comparison of spatial distributions of both archaeological sites and various resources. The northern half of Guam is ideal for this land use study as the area is an uplifted coral island where potential resources are unevenly distributed. The aim of this paper is to verify the traditional view of the site distribution pattern in northern Guam, permanently inhabited village sites on the coast, and sporadically utilized sites on the plateau by spatial distribution of the visualized and quantified archaeological data in order to understand how land was used during the Latte Period. Thus, the latte stones have been selected as the analysis target to clarify the distribution of Latte Period sites. 2. Environment of Northern Guam The island of Guam is the largest and southernmost of the Mariana Islands in Western Micronesia, with an area of ca. 550 km2. The geology of the island is roughly divided into 2 Spatial Distribution of Latte Stones in Northern Guam 63 domains separated across the middle of the island by the Pago-Adelup fault (Figure 1). The northern half of the island, northern Guam, is karst terrain composed of uplifted coralline reef, while the southern half is an older volcanic landmass. Most of northern Guam forms a flat limestone plateau bordered by sheer cliffs along the coast. A series of narrow coastal lowlands stretch below the cliff line. These are either low-raised coastal terraces composed of limestone substrate or sand flats composed of unconsolidated calcareous bioclasts. In some locations, middle terraces were formed between the upper plateau and the coastal lowlands. Due to porous limestone substrate, there is no perennial surface stream on the plateau. On the other hand, the southern end of the plateau near the Pago-Adelup fault is an intricately dissected area composed of an argillaceous member of the Mariana limestone with several drainage systems and wetlands (Randall and Holloman, 1974; Taborosi et al., 2004; Tracey et al., 1964). 3. Previous Studies on the Distribution of Archaeological Sites in Northern Guam By the time of European contact in the 16th and 17th centuries, most islands of the Mariana archipelago had been inhabited by the Chamorro. According to historical documents written by the Jesuits, 180 villages were located in Guam at both coast and inland (Levesque, 1995). At the end of the Latte Period, around 1700CE, northern Guam had been largely depopulated as a result of Spanish relocation policies (Section 4.3). In 1819, Freycinet (2003: 69, 81–82) witnessed numerous stone mortars scattered over the plateau, but the absence of a water source nearby made him believe that these had not been signs of prehistoric human activities. Thus, site distribution and environment in northern Guam has been a longstanding concern of researchers as reviewed below. Based on result of Hans G. Hornbostel’s survey in the 1920s, Thompson (1940) estimated that there were about 270 “latte sites” in Guam. The sites were more abundant in the lowlands, in well-watered coves, as well as in the central part of Guam, while they were fewer in number on the northern plateau (Thompson, 1932: 15–16). After the devastating ground battle in 1944 followed by the post-war development, Osborne (n.d., 1947) and Reed (1952) plotted archaeological sites on Guam as they had witnessed many sites being disturbed. While Hornbostel and Osborne located several large inland sites, Reed negated large inland sites reported by the former. Between July 1965 and June 1966, Reinman (1968, 1977) had conducted an island-wide survey primarily aimed at understanding the relationship between the various sites and their locations, especially the coast, river valleys, and interior regions (Reinman, 1977: viii). Reinman (1966) reported archaeological sites in nearly all of the surveyed coastal areas and southern interior, with highest density at sandy beaches. However, the northern interior was not surveyed in detail (Reinman, 1968: 42–43). Still, Reinman’s map continues to be the most extensively plotted 64 T. Shimasaki site distribution map on Guam. He implied that freshwater regions were favored for settlement (Reinman, 1966: 47). As the development of Guam intensified in the 1980s, the largely ignored northern interior was surveyed little by little (e.g. Cordy and Allen, 1986; Haun, 1988; Kurashina and McGrath, 1987; Kurashina and Sinoto, 1984). As a result, many researchers tried to correlate the distribution pattern of prehistoric sites with that of natural resources. Kurashina and McGrath (1987) pointed out the contrast between coastal areas and interior areas with regard to the environment, natural resources, and archaeological sites. While there are numerous latte stones and midden deposits on coastal sites, they are scarce inland. They concluded that ecologically, the prehistoric land use was marginal on the northern interior plateau where water is not available. Several projects that surveyed large areas from the shore to the plateau in the 1990s expanded our knowledge of site distribution patterns (e.g. Dilli et al., 1998; Henry and Haun, 1993; Highness and Haun , 1992; Liston, 1996; Olmo et al., 2000). Assuming that most of the sites in the northern interior dated back to the Latte Period, Highness et al. (1991) pointed out that on the plateau, sites are clustered near the fault zones where fertile soil and water is available. Kurashina (1991) discussed prehistoric settlement patterns based on the environmental context to view human adaptive strategy. This study shows island-wide diachronic distribution of sites dating back to the Latte and Pre-Latte Periods by mapping and overlapping distributions of archaeological sites and available freshwater sources in order to show how they are interrelated. However, since most of the plotted archaeological sites are the ones reported by Reinman, the sites in the northern interior were mostly ignored. Meanwhile, in southern Guam, as the sites in the interior uplands have been extensively mapped, numerous prehistoric sites mostly dating to the Latte Period have been reported (e.g. Hunter-Anderson, 1994). Haun and Workman (1993) have compiled data on site distribution along several river systems and reservoirs to conclude that many of the sites in southern Guam are located close to water and arable soil. As a result of these efforts, the general pattern of site distribution on Guam and the Mariana Islands indicate larger sites in coastal areas and smaller sites in the interior (e.g. Russell, 1998: 110). By the 2000s, as the site distribution pattern became clearer in northern Guam, many attempted to interpret the distribution pattern of sites in northern Guam, including the plateau. Olmo et al. (2000) discussed site distribution in northern Guam, focusing on the interior sites by reviewing 35 surveys that had been conducted since 1981, pointing out that previous researchers had underrated the northern plateau and hypothesizing that the northern plateau had served as a resource reservoir to exploit forest species and arable soil.
Recommended publications
  • Visual/Media Arts
    A R T I S T D I R E C T O R Y ARTIST DIRECTORY (Updated as of August 2021) md The Guam Council on the Arts and Humanities Agency (GCAHA) has produced this Artist Directory as a resource for students, the community, and our constituents. This Directory contains names, contact numbers, email addresses, and mailing or home address of Artists on island and the various disciplines they represent. If you are interested in being included in the directory, please call our office at 300-1204~8/ 7583/ 7584, or visit our website (www.guamcaha.org) to download the Artist Directory Registration Form. TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCIPLINE PAGE NUMBER FOLK/ TRADITIONAL ARTS 03 - 17 VISUAL/ MEDIA ARTS 18 - 78 PERFORMING ARTS 79 - 89 LITERATURE/ HUMANITIES 90 - 96 ART RELATED ORGANIZATIONS 97 – 100 MASTER’S 101 - 103 2 FOLK/ TRADITIONAL ARTS Folk Arts enriches the lives of the Guam community, gives recognition to the indigenous and ethnic artists and their art forms and to promote a greater understanding of Guam’s native and multi-ethnic community. Ronald Acfalle “ Halu’u” P.O. BOX 9771 Tamuning, Guam 96931 [email protected] 671-689-8277 Builder and apprentice of ancient Chamorro (seafaring) sailing canoes, traditional homes and chanter. James Bamba P.O. BOX 26039 Barrigada, Guam 96921 [email protected] 671-488-5618 Traditional/ Contemporary CHamoru weaver specializing in akgak (pandanus) and laagan niyok (coconut) weaving. I can weave guagua’ che’op, ala, lottot, guaha, tuhong, guafak, higai, kostat tengguang, kustat mama’on, etc. Arisa Terlaje Barcinas P.O.BOX 864 Hagatna, Guam 96932 671-488-2782, 671-472-8896 [email protected] Coconut frond weaving in traditional and contemporary styles.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Schedule Carmel Catholic School Agat and Santa Rita Area to Mount Bus No.: B-39 Driver: Salas, Vincent R
    BUS SchoolSCHEDULE Year 2020 - 2021 Dispatcher Bus Operations - 646-3122 | Superintendent Franklin F. Tait ano - 646-3208 | Assistant Superintendent Daniel B. Quintanilla - 647-5025 THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BUS OPERATIONS REQUIRES ALL STUDENTS TO WEAR A MASK PRIOR TO BOARDING THE BUS. THERE WILL BE ONE CHILD PER SEAT FOR SOCIAL DISTANCING. PLEASE ANTICIPATE DELAYS IN PICK UP AND DROP OFF AT DESIGNATED BUS SHELTERS. THANK YOU. TENJO VISTA AND SANTA RITA AREAS TO O/C-30 Hanks 5:46 2:29 OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL O/C-29 Oceanview Drive 5:44 2:30 A-2 Tenjo Vista Entrance 7:30 4:01 O/C-28 Nimitz Hill Annex 5:40 2:33 A-3 Tenjo Vista Lower 7:31 4:00 SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL 6:15 1:50 AGAT A-5 Perez #1 7:35 3:56 PAGACHAO AREA TO MARCIAL SABLAN DRIVER: AGUON, DAVID F. A-14 Lizama Station 7:37 3:54 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (A.M. ONLY) BUS NO.: B-123 A-15 Borja Station 7:38 3:53 SANTA ANA AREAS TO SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL A-38 Pagachao Upper 7:00 A-16 Naval Magazine 7:39 3:52 MARCIAL SABLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7:10 STATION LOCATION NAME PICK UP DROP OFF A-17 Sgt. Cruz 7:40 3:51 A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 5:50 2:19 A-18 M & R Store 7:41 3:50 PAGACHAO AREA TO OCEANVIEW MIDDLE A-43 Cruz #2 5:52 2:17 SCHOOL A-42 San Nicolas 5:54 2:15 A-19 Annex 7:42 3:49 A-41 Quidachay 5:56 2:12 A-20 Rapolla Station 7:43 3:48 A-46 Round Table 7:15 3:45 A-40 Santa Ana 5:57 2:11 OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL 7:50 3:30 A-38 Pagachao Upper 7:22 3:53 A-39 Last Stop 5:59 2:10 A-37 Pagachao Lower 7:25 3:50 SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL 6:11 1:50 HARRY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change in Guam: Indicators and Considerations for Key Sectors
    PIRCA 2020 PIRCA 2020 PIRCA Indicators & Considerations for Key Sectors Report for the Pacific Islands Regional Climate Assessment (PIRCA) Indicators and Considerations for Key Sectors CLIMATE CHANGE IN GUAM 1 PIRCA 2020 The East-West Center promotes better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, the Pacific, and Asia through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. Established by the US Congress in 1960, the Center serves as a resource for information and analysis on critical issues of common concern, bringing people together to exchange views, build expertise, and develop policy options. The Center’s 21-acre Honolulu campus, adjacent to the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, is located midway between Asia and the US mainland and features research, residential, and international conference facilities. The Center’s Washington, DC, office focuses on preparing the United States for an era of growing Asia Pacific prominence. The East-West Center hosts the core office of the Pacific RISA grant, providing administrative and research capabilities for the program. The Pacific RISA is one of the 11 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) teams that conduct research that builds the nation’s capacity to prepare for and adapt to climate variability and change. This work is supported by funding from NOAA. The Pacific RISA provided primary oversight of this and the 2012 PIRCA report. EastWestCenter.org PacificRISA.org ISBN: 978-1-932728-91-0 (print) ISBN: 978-1-932728-93-4 (electronic) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4037481 Recommended Citation: Grecni, Z., W. Miles, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Volume
    Photograph by Carim Yanoria Nåna by Kisha Borja-Quichocho Like the tåsa and haligi of the ancient Chamoru latte stone so, too, does your body maintain the shape of the healthy Chamoru woman. With those full-figured hips features delivered through natural birth for generations and with those powerful arms reaching for the past calling on our mañaina you have remained strong throughout the years continuously inspire me to live my culture allow me to grow into a young Chamoru woman myself. Through you I have witnessed the persistence and endurance of my ancestors who never failed in constructing a latte. I gima` taotao mo`na the house of the ancient people. Hågu i acho` latte-ku. You are my latte stone. The latte stone (acho` latte) was once the foundation of Chamoru homes in the Mariana Islands. It was carved out of limestone or basalt and varied in size, measuring between three and sixteen feet in height. It contained two parts, the tasa (a cup-like shape, the top portion of the latte) and the haligi (the bottom pillar) and were organized into two rows, with three to seven latte stones per row. Today, several latte stones still stand, and there are also many remnants of them throughout the Marianas. Though Chamorus no longer use latte stones as the foundations of their homes, the latte symbolize the strength of the Chamorus and their culture as well as their resiliency in times of change. Micronesian Educator Editor: Unaisi Nabobo-Baba Special Edition Guest Editors: Michael Lujan Bevacqua Victoria Lola Leon Guerrero Editorial Board: Donald Rubinstein Christopher Schreiner Editorial Assistants: Matthew Raymundo Carim Yanoria Design and Layout: Pascual Olivares ISSN 1061-088x Published by: The School of Education, University of Guam UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam 96923 Contents Guest Editor’s Introduction ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Public Works Division of Bus Operations Pupil Transportation Bus Schedule School Year 2017-2018
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF BUS OPERATIONS PUPIL TRANSPORTATION BUS SCHEDULE SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018 DRIVER: AGUON, DAVID F. BUS NO. B-123 SUPERVISOR: TAIJERON, RICKY U. SUBSTATION: AGAT MORNING AFTERNOON STUDENT S T A T I O N S PICK-UP DROP-OFF COUNT MILEAGE AGAT SUBSTATION SANTA ANA AREAS TO SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL STATION LOCATION NAME A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 5:50 2:19 A-43 Cruz #2 5:52 2:17 A-42 San Nicolas 5:54 2:15 A-41 Quidachay 5:56 2:12 A-40 Santa Ana 5:57 2:11 A-39 Last Stop 5:59 2:10 SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL 6:11 1:50 SANTA ANA AREAS TO MARCIAL SABLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 7:02 3:03 A-43 Cruz #2 7:00 3:02 A-42 San Nicolas 7:04 3:00 A-41 Quidachay 7:07 2:57 A-40 Santa Ana 7:09 2:53 A-39 Last Stop 7:11 MARCIAL SABLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7:15 2:40 SANTA ANA AREAS TO OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 7:22 3:57 A-43 Cruz #2 7:20 3:55 A-42 San Nicolas 7:24 3:53 A-41 Quidachay 7:26 3:51 A-40 Santa Ana 7:28 3:49 A-39 Last Stop 7:30 3:47 OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL 7:35 3:30 A-1 1 OF 1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF BUS OPERATIONS PUPIL TRANSPORTATION BUS SCHEDULE SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018 DRIVER: BORJA, GARY P.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers Guide.Pages
    I HINANAO-TA NU I MANAOTAO TÅNO’-I CHAMORU SIHA The Journey of the CHamoru People The Guam Museum’s Permanent Exhibition Teacher’s Guide Produced by Guampedia I HINANAO-TA NU I MANAOTAO TÅNO’-I CHAMORU SIHA The Journey of the CHamoru People The Guam Museum’s Permanent Exhibition Teacher’s Guide Note to readers: Underlined words in this document are links to entries in guampedia.com and other online resources. Guam Museum Permanent Exhibition Overview History of the Guam Museum The Guam Museum, officially called the Senator Antonio M. Palomo Guam and CHamoru Educational Facility, is the first structure built for the sole purpose of housing and displaying Guam’s precious historic treasures. The Guam Museum reflects the diversity, creativity, and resilience of the people of Guam and the Mariana Islands. The permanent exhibition is the story of the CHamoru people, told from a CHamoru perspective. It is hoped to encourage people to engage in dialogue, to share perspectives and experiences and debate issues that concern us all today. I Hale’ta: Mona yan Tatte: 90 Years in the Making The earliest printed record of people making plans for a new museum dates back to 1926. The Guam Teachers Association, led by Ramon M. Sablan, a teacher best known as the author of the “Guam Hymn,” asked residents and friends of Guam to start collecting their antiques and other artifacts for a museum that would protect their history and CHamoru culture. The editor of the Guam Recorder, one of the earliest publications printed and circulated on Guam, also called for the opening of a museum.
    [Show full text]
  • AAPI National Historic Landmarks Theme Study Essay 12
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior A National Historic Landmarks Theme Study ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC ISLANDER ISLANDER AMERICAN PACIFIC ASIAN Finding a Path Forward ASIAN AMERICAN PACIFIC ISLANDER NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS THEME STUDY LANDMARKS HISTORIC NATIONAL NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS THEME STUDY Edited by Franklin Odo Use of ISBN This is the official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. Use of 978-0-692-92584-3 is for the U.S. Government Publishing Office editions only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Publishing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Odo, Franklin, editor. | National Historic Landmarks Program (U.S.), issuing body. | United States. National Park Service. Title: Finding a Path Forward, Asian American and Pacific Islander National Historic Landmarks theme study / edited by Franklin Odo. Other titles: Asian American and Pacific Islander National Historic Landmarks theme study | National historic landmark theme study. Description: Washington, D.C. : National Historic Landmarks Program, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, 2017. | Series: A National Historic Landmarks theme study | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017045212| ISBN 9780692925843 | ISBN 0692925848 Subjects: LCSH: National Historic Landmarks Program (U.S.) | Asian Americans--History. | Pacific Islander Americans--History. | United States--History. Classification: LCC E184.A75 F46 2017 | DDC 973/.0495--dc23 | SUDOC I 29.117:AS 4 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017045212 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of Guam the State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of Guam
    The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of Guam The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of Guam David Burdick1, Valerie Brown2,4, Jacob Asher3,4, Mike Gawel5, Lee Goldman6, Amy Hall3,4, Jean Kenyon3,4, Trina Leberer7, Emily Lundblad3,4, Jenny McIlwain6, Joyce Miller3,4, Dwayne Minton8, Marc Nadon3,4, Nick Pioppi6, Laurie Raymundo6, Benjamin Richards3,4, Robert Schroeder3,4, Peter Schupp6, Ellen Smith3,4 and Brian Zgliczynski3 Guam INTRODUCTION AND SETTING This report provides an assessment of the status of the coral reef ecosystems of Guam between 2004 and 2007. The find- ings of various monitoring activities, assessments, and stand-alone investigations conducted by local and federal agen- cies, educational/research institutions, and government contractors since 2004 were synthesized to obtain an updated, holistic view of the status of Guam’s reefs. Guam, a U.S. territory located at 13°28’ N, 144°45’ E, is the southernmost island in the Mariana Archipelago (Figure 15.1). It is the largest island in Micronesia, with a land mass of 560 km2, and has a maximum elevation of approximately 405 m and a total shoreline length of 244 km. Guam is a volcanic island completely surrounded by a coralline limestone plateau. The relatively flat northern half of the island, which is primarily comprised of uplifted limestone, is the site of the island’s principle aquifer. The southern half of the island has more topographic relief and is comprised mainly of volcanic rock, with areas of highly erodible lateritic soils. The hilly topography creates numerous watersheds drained by 96 rivers (Best and Davidson, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • The Shallow• Water Holothurians of Guam 1
    The Shallow• Water Holothurians of Guam 1 F. W. E. ROWE The Australia11 Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney , N.S. W. 2000, Australia J. E. DOTY The Mari11e Laboratory, University of Guam, Aga11a, Guam 96910 Abstract-Thirty species of holothurians are now known from Guam; of these, six are new records. A key to the species is given along with illustrations of living specimens and their spicules. The distributional patterns of species across several of Guam's reef flats are discussed . A list is given of the commercially utilisable species of the island and the zoogeographical relationships of the Guamanian fauna are described . Methods of preservation and identification are also described . Introduction The earliest published record of a holothurian collected from Guam is that of Ho/othuria guamensis described by Quoy and Gaimard (1833). Brandt (1835) described a new species, Holothuria (Microthele) rnaculata, from "Insula Guahan," referring H . guarnensis to the genus Muel/eria Jaeger. Apart from these records, little attention has been given to the holothurian fauna of Guam until the present century . Lindsey (1935) reported on the costs of the various kinds of Beebe-de-Mer forms occurring around Guam and indicated that there was once a flourishing trade from the island . Frey (1951) reported the use made by local Guamanian fishermen of crude extracts from Holothuria atra to stun fish in reef pools. He also cited an earlier reference to this local custom (in Guam Recorder , May 1941 ; not seen by the authors) . Janice Beaty (1964 and 1966), a local reporter, wrote two popular articles describing many interesting habits of the holothurians occurring on the reef flats of Guam and the uses to which the holothurians have been put.
    [Show full text]
  • HR 4686 EH 3 1 Prehistoric Site That Is Surrounded by Tall-Canopy 2 Limestone Forest
    111TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 4686 AN ACT To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suit- ability and feasibility of designating prehistoric, historic, and limestone forest sites on Rota, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, as a unit of the National Park System. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 2 1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 3 ‘‘Rota Cultural and Natural Resources Study Act’’. 4 (b) FINDINGS.—Congress finds as follows: 5 (1) The island of Rota was the only major is- 6 land in the Mariana Islands to be spared the de- 7 struction and large scale land use changes brought 8 about by World War II. 9 (2) The island of Rota has been described by 10 professional archeologists as having the most numer- 11 ous, most intact, and generally the most unique pre- 12 historic sites of any of the islands of the Mariana 13 Archipelago. 14 (3) The island of Rota contains remaining ex- 15 amples of what is known as the Latte Phase of the 16 cultural tradition of the indigenous Chamorro people 17 of the Mariana Islands. Latte stone houses are rem- 18 nants of the ancient Chamorro culture. 19 (4) Four prehistoric sites are listed on the Na- 20 tional Register of Historic Places: Monchon Archeo- 21 logical District (also known locally as Monchon 22 Latte Stone Village), Taga Latte Stone Quarry, the 23 Dugi Archeological Site that contains, latte stone 24 structures, and the Chugai Pictograph Cave that 25 contains examples of ancient Chamorro rock art.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2017 | Volume 6, Issue No
    March 2017 | Volume 6, Issue No. 1 Håfa Adai Everyday Håfa Adai Pledge Program Reaches Milestone Åmot Farm Inc. became the 700th member of the Håfa Adai Pledge program on Thursday, March 9 in Dededo. It marked a milestone for the Guam Visitors Bureau’s local community branding campaign. From left: Miranda Muñoz, GVB administrative assistant; Dee Hernandez, GVB cultural heritage ocer; Clare Calvo, Åmot Farm Inc. board member; Jon Nathan Denight, GVB president and CEO; Rose Cunlie, GVB director of finance and administration; Senator Tina Muña Barnes, 33rd Guam Legislature; Bernice T. Nelson, Åmot Farm Inc. suruhana and farm manager; Frank Rabon, Åmot Farm Inc. board chairman; Bill McDonald, Åmot Farm Inc. board member; Liz Stinson, board member; Mayor Melissa B. Savares, village of Dededo, mayor; Gwendolyn Tudela Aguon, Åmot Farm Inc. consultant; Senator Joe S. San Agustin, 34th Guam Legislature; Seb Pehlivanian, DPHSS NCD community gardens member; Zina Ruiz, Åmot Farm Inc. secretary; Ronald T. Laguana, Åmot Farm Inc., board member; and Retta Sue Hamilton, Åmot Farm Inc. executive director. 34th Guam Legislature Takes Håfa Adai Pledge: The Guam Visitors Bureau welcomed the 34th Guam Legislature to the Håfa Adai Pledge program. Senators took the pledge at a special ceremony on Friday, March 10 in the Guam Legislature building in Hagåtña. From left: Sen. Louise B. Muna; Sen. Mary C. Torres; Sen. Frank B. Aguon Jr.; Vice Speaker Therese M. Terlaje; Bart Jackson, GVB board member; Speaker Benjamin J.F. Cruz; Sen. Dennis G. Rodriguez Jr., chairman of tourism committee; Pilar Laguana, GVB director of global marketing; Young Sook Hong, GVB board member; Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Latte Period Archaeology
    Micronesica 42(1/2): 1–79, 2012 An overview of latte period archaeology MIKE T. CARSON Micronesian Area Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923 USA Abstract—Studies of megalithic ruins called latte and other related material traces potentially offer insights into an associated latte period, approximately A.D. 900 through 1700, quite distinctive from preceding cultural periods that began as early at 1500 B.C. in the Mariana Islands. Vastly more is known of this latte period than any other in Marianas regional archaeology, yet numerous basic questions continue to be considered and debated. The present work aims to summarize current data and thinking about latte research. Introduction The theme “archaeological studies of the latte period” was chosen for this volume of Micronesica to embrace the plentiful ways archaeologists and others conceptualize these megalithic ruins and their significance toward indigenous cultural history and heritage in the Mariana Islands (Figure 1). Today, latte stones vibrantly symbolize native Chamorro cultural identity (Figure 2), and they embody a material link to an ancestral society prior to the last few centuries of foreign colonial rule and evolving globalized context of the Chamorro people. During the last several decades of archaeological study, latte sites and their multiple associations have proven to be quite complex, deserving equally complex modes of study. Interpretive models are even more complicated in attempts to comprehend or explain the functions of latte stones and the evolution of native Chamorro society associated with these ancient sites. In common usage, the word latte refers to sets of megalithic pillars (haligi) and “caps” or capitals (tasa) that at one time presumably supported wooden superstructures (Figure 3).
    [Show full text]