DOCSLIB.ORG

Bolton Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Region of York City of Toronto Town of Caledon Metrolinx Has Completed the Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bolton Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Region of York City of Toronto Town of Caledon Metrolinx Has Completed the Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study 2010 | 1608133 D16-09037 20 Bay Street, Suite 600 Toronto, ON M5J 2W3 Page 2 of 2 20 rue Bay, bureau 600 Toronto, ON M5J 2W3 www.metrolinx.com www.gotransit.com Distribution: November 11, 2010 Canadian Pacific Railway CN Rail Dear Stakeholders, Ontario Ministry of Transportation Region of Peel Subject: Bolton Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Region of York City of Toronto Town of Caledon Metrolinx has completed the Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study. Please find City of Vaughan enclosed a copy of the study. The study was a comprehensive review of the technical Toronto Transit Commission requirements to implement a commuter rail service between the communities of Bolton (in the York Region Transit Town of Caledon) and the City of Toronto. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority The study found that introducing the service is feasible, which supports the vision outlined in the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority provincial government’s MoveOntario 2020 plan, as well as Metrolinx’ Regional Transportation George Brown College Plan (RTP) and GO 2020. The feasibility study will be a valuable input to the update of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP – ‘The Big Move’) and GO 2020, which is being undertaken in 2011. Metrolinx and GO Transit are currently reviewing 10-year capital budgets. In light of competing service expansion priorities, rail service expansion to Bolton is not being contemplated within a 10-year timeframe. In the meantime, we will continue to monitor demand of the existing GO bus services, and implement service improvements as warranted for the overall development of transit service in the study area. Also, we plan to actively work with the respective regional and local municipalities to implement planning measures for the protection of the proposed commuter rail layover and station sites identified in the study. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me. Kind Regards, Daniel Haufschild, Director, Policy and Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................... 1 3.0 EXISTING TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES AND ADJACENT HIGHWAY AND RAIL CORRIDORS ....6 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 3.1 Existing Transit Alternatives ............................................................................................ 6 3.1.1 GO Train-Meet Service ................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Scope of Study ................................................................................................................ 7 3.1.3 VIA Rail ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Geographic Scope of Study............................................................................................. 7 3.1.4 Bus Coach Service.......................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 CP Mactier Subdivision ...................................................................................................7 3.2 Expansion of the Provincial Highway Network ................................................................ 6 1.2.2 GO Weston Subdivision and Union Station Rail Corridor................................................ 8 3.2.1 Highway 427.................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 CP North Toronto Subdivision ......................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 GTA West Corridor.......................................................................................................... 6 1.2.4 CN Subdivisions .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2.3 Highway 400.................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Feasibility Study Report Methodology ........................................................................... 10 3.2.4 HOV Lane Network Plan – 400 Series ............................................................................ 7 1.4 Documentation Review ................................................................................................. 10 3.2.5 Highway 50...................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.6 Summary of Highway Initiatives ...................................................................................... 7 3.3 Adjacent Rail Corridors ................................................................................................... 7 2.0 PROJECT APPROACH .............................................................................................. 1 3.3.1 GO Barrie Corridor .......................................................................................................... 7 3.3.2 GO Richmond Hill Corridor.............................................................................................. 8 2.1 Study Organization.......................................................................................................... 1 3.2.3 GO Stouffville Corridor .................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 1 3.2.4 GO Georgetown Corridor ................................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Site Inspections ............................................................................................................... 1 3.3.5 Orangeville Brampton Railway ........................................................................................ 8 2.2 Internal Involvement ........................................................................................................ 1 2.2.1 GO Transit....................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY – EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................8 2.2.2 Canadian Pacific ............................................................................................................. 2 2.2.3 Canadian National Railway Company ............................................................................. 2 4.1 Existing Infrastructure Conditions.................................................................................... 8 2.3 External Involvement.......................................................................................................2 4.2 CP Mactier Subdivision ................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Federal Government Agencies........................................................................................ 2 4.2.1 Osler to Emery (mileage 0.0 – 9.2)................................................................................ 10 2.3.2 Provincial Government Agencies .................................................................................... 2 4.2.1.1 Track Conditions and Configuration1 ............................................................................ 10 2.3.2.1 Metrolinx.......................................................................................................................... 2 4.2.1.2 Speed, Curve and Grade Conditions............................................................................. 10 2.3.2.2 Ministry of Transportation Ontario ................................................................................... 2 4.2.1.3 Rail/Road At-Grade Crossings ...................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Municipal and Regional Agencies ................................................................................... 3 4.2.1.4 Structures Conditions .................................................................................................... 11 2.3.3.1 Regional Municipality of York ..........................................................................................3 4.2.1.5 Culvert Conditions ......................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3.2 Regional Municipality of Peel ..........................................................................................3 4.2.2 Emery to Elder South (mile 14.13) ................................................................................ 15 2.3.3.3 City of Toronto and Toronto Transit Commission ............................................................ 3 4.2.2.1 Track Conditions and Configuration .............................................................................. 15 2.3.3.4 City of Vaughan............................................................................................................... 4 4.2.2.2 Speed, Curve, and Grade Conditions............................................................................ 16 2.3.3.5 Town of Caledon ............................................................................................................. 4 4.2.2.3 Rail/Road At-Grade Crossings
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications
    Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 APPENDIX 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX 2A: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION ...................................................... 1 1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................. 1 1.4. Overview of Engagement Methodology ................................................................................... 2 2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT HIGHLIGHTS TO DATE ....................................................................... 3 2.1. Non‐Government Stakeholder List and Study Database ........................................................... 3 2.2. Electrification Study Website .................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Stakeholder Workshop # 1 ........................................................................................................ 4 2.4. Metrolinx Planning and Transportation Leaders Forum ........................................................... 4 2.5. GO Transit Customer Service Advisory Committee Meeting ..................................................... 4 2.6. Update Meeting (Georgetown Corridor) ................................................................................... 4 2.7. Municipal Transit Leaders Briefing
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Service Breaks Ground in Mississauga
    No. H0xx/10 For release August 20, 2010 BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE BREAKS GROUND IN MISSISSAUGA MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO — Bob Dechert, Member of Parliament, Mississauga-Erindale, the Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Ontario’s Transportation Minister, Her Worship Hazel McCallion, Mayor of Mississauga and Gary McNeil, GO Transit Managing Director participated in a groundbreaking ceremony today to mark the start of construction of the Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor. This project, which is expected to be completed in spring 2013, will improve local and inter-regional bus operations across the City of Mississauga. It involves constructing an 11-kilometre east-west busway across the City of Mississauga between Winston Churchill Boulevard and Renforth Drive in the City of Toronto and a total of 12 stations along the route with related commuter facilities. “Investments in public transit creates jobs and boosts the Canadian economy,” said MP Dechert. “This rapid transit system will provide commuters in Mississauga with a more efficient transit option, while cutting commute times and taking more cars off the road.” “This is great news for Mississauga residents,” said Ontario Transportation Minister Kathleen Wynne. “When the new bus rapid transit line is finished, more commuters will be able to leave their cars at home and take public transit. Investing in public transit is part of the McGuinty government’s Open Ontario plan. Better public transit means a better quality of life for Ontario families.” (TBC) “We are doing everything we can to make Mississauga a transit-oriented city and show our commitment to ensure we meet the needs of residents and businesses,” said Mayor Hazel McCallion.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report
    GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study Revised Draft Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report PREFACE The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) is one of several interim reports which depicts the study process culminating in the Transportation Development Strategy. The Area Transportation System Problems and Opportunities Report – Draft for Consultation (2009) was first issued in July 2009. The reports purpose was to summarize the process and methodology that was used to identify transportation problems and opportunities, and to document the key findings of this work. In the consultation period following its release, the study team received comments relating to a range of issues, including municipal planning policy, transportation modelling, and planned transportation initiatives within the preliminary study area. The purpose of this revised draft report (December 2010) is to ensure that all comments received have been adequately addressed; where appropriate, the content of the report has been revised accordingly. Appendix C provides a Summary of the Input Received on the draft Problems and Opportunities Report, and details each comment received, the study team’s response, and any changes incorporated into the revised draft report. www.gta-west.com GTA West Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Investigation Report In
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R11T0016 MAIN TRACK DERAILMENT CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY FREIGHT TRAIN 220-24 MILE 105.1, MACTIER SUBDIVISION BUCKSKIN, ONTARIO 26 JANUARY 2011 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Main-Track Derailment Canadian Pacific Railway Freight Train 220-24 Mile 105.1, MacTier Subdivision Buckskin, Ontario 26 January 2011 Report Number R11T0016 Summary On 26 January 2011, at approximately 0310, Eastern Standard Time, as Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) freight train 220-24 was travelling southward at about 45 mph, one of its cars derailed at Mile 105.1 of the CP MacTier Subdivision, near Buckskin, Ontario. The train continued on to the Buckskin north siding switch at Mile 103.7 where an additional 20 cars, including dangerous goods tank car PROX 33743, loaded with non-odorized liquefied petroleum gas (UN 1075), derailed. Some of the derailed cars side-swiped northbound CP freight train 221-25, which was stationary in the Buckskin siding, derailing its lead locomotive, and damaging the second locomotive and the first 9 cars on train 221. As a precaution, 15 families from the nearby area were evacuated. There were no injuries and no loss of product. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. - 2 - Other Factual Information Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) and Canadian National (CN) operate parallel trans-continental rail routes throughout the area. Under a bidirectional running agreement, both railways operate primarily empty trains northbound on CP track between Mile 20.1 and Mile 112.7 of the Parry Sound Subdivision, and loaded southbound trains on CN track between Mile 146.2 and Mile 247.5 of the CN Bala Subdivision, respectively (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Investigation Report R07d0111 Crossing Collision
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R07D0111 CROSSING COLLISION VIA RAIL CANADA INC. PASSENGER TRAIN NUMBER 35 MILE 23.57, CANADIAN NATIONAL KINGSTON SUBDIVISION PINCOURT/TERRASSE-VAUDREUIL, QUEBEC 17 DECEMBER 2007 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Crossing Collision VIA Rail Canada Inc. Passenger Train Number 35 Mile 23.57, Canadian National Kingston Subdivision Pincourt/Terrasse-Vaudreuil, Quebec 17 December 2007 Report Number R07D0111 Synopsis On 17 December 2007, at approximately 1549 eastern standard time, VIA Rail Canada Inc. passenger train No. 35, travelling westward at 62 mph on the south main track of Canadian National’s Kingston Subdivision, struck an empty tractor-trailer that was immobilized on the 3e Avenue level public crossing located at Mile 23.57, near Pincourt/Terrasse-Vaudreuil, Quebec. The tractor-trailer was destroyed; the locomotive was damaged and was unable to continue. Subsequently, 76 passengers were transferred to another VIA Rail Canada Inc. train and rail traffic was delayed for up to 3 ½ hours. The truck driver sustained minor injuries. There was no derailment and no track damage. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2009 Cat. No. TU3-6/07-1E ISBN 978-1-100-12406-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Factual Information .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Round 2 Consultation Report 2020-2021, TO360
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy 2020-2021 Public Consultation Round Two March 2021 Table of Contents Background .................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the local map consultation ................................................................................... 2 Outreach and notification ........................................................................................................... 5 Summary of engagement statistics ........................................................................................... 9 Detailed feedback by local map area....................................................................................... 10 Other feedback about TO360 maps, in general ..................................................................... 19 Next steps ................................................................................................................................... 19 Attachment A: List of organizations invited to participate Attachment B: Round Two Draft Wayfinding Maps Background The Toronto 360 (“TO360”) Wayfinding project is a pedestrian wayfinding system which is a central component of the City’s ambition to make Toronto a more walkable, welcoming and understandable place for visitors and residents alike. TO360 provides consistent wayfinding information through a unified signage and mapping system delivered by the City and project partners. Following the successful completion of
    [Show full text]
  • CROSSTOWN LRT West Open House March 20, 2018
    CROSSTOWN LRT West Open House March 20, 2018 • Metrolinx was created in 2006 by the Province of Ontario to improve the coordination and integration of all modes of transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. • Guided by its Regional Transportation Plan, Metrolinx has worked to plan, design and build a regional transportation network that aims to enhance the quality of life, the environment and the prosperity of area residents. METROLINX’S GEOGRAPHIC MANDATE: THE GREATER TORONTO AND HAMILTON AREA (GTHA) Expansive • 8,242 km2 — 1.5 times the size of Prince Edward Island • Diverse spectrum of urban, suburban and rural land use Fast-growing • 7 million people in 2016 • Over 10 million by 2041 Complex • 4 levels of government • 30 municipalities Certain Metrolinx initiatives reach beyond the GTHA • 9 municipal transit agencies + • Select GO Transit services extend to an outer arc of communities Metrolinx including Peterborough, Barrie, Waterloo and Niagara • PRESTO and Transit Procurement Initiative serve communities across Ontario THE BIG MOVE $30+ BILLION IN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT OVER $30B IN INVESTMENT IN THE GTHA’S RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK EXPANDING GO 64 KM OF NEW 52 KM OF NEW CONNECTING IT TRAIN SERVICE LIGHT RAIL BUS RAPID ALL TOGETHER TRANSIT TRANSIT . Expanding and . More service on all revitalizing Union lines Under construction: Partially in-service, Station, the heart of . Eglinton with remainder the regional network . Electric trains, Crosstown under construction: every 15 minutes . PRESTO now in use or better in both In procurement: . Viva in York across the Region directions, for most . Finch West Region GO customers . Hurontario . Mississauga . Hamilton Transitway .
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL WALKING TOUR of Deer Park Joan C
    HISTORICAL WALKING TOUR OF Deer Park Joan C. Kinsella Ye Merrie Circle, at Reservoir Park, c.1875 T~ Toronto Public Library Published with the assistance of Marathon Realty Company Limited, Building Group. ~THON --- © Copyright 1996 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Toronto Public Library Board Kinsella. Joan c. (Joan Claire) 281 Front Street East, Historical walking tour of Deer Park Toronto, Ontario Includes bibliographical references. M5A412 ISBN 0-920601-26-X Designed by: Derek Chung Tiam Fook 1. Deer Park (Toronto, OnL) - Guidebooks. 2. Walking - Ontario - Toronto - Guidebooks Printed and bound in Canada by: 3. Historic Buildings - Ontario - Toronto - Guidebooks Hignell Printing Limited, Winnipeg, Manitoba 4. Toronto (Ont.) - Buildings, structures, etc - Guidebooks. 5. Toronto (OnL) - Guidebooks. Cover Illustrations I. Toronto Public Ubrary Board. II. TItle. Rosehill Reservoir Park, 189-? FC3097.52.K56 1996 917.13'541 C96-9317476 Stereo by Underwood & Underwood, FI059.5.T68D45 1996 Published by Strohmeyer & Wyman MTL Tll753 St.Clair Avenue, looking east to Inglewood Drive, showing the new bridge under construction and the 1890 iron bridge, November 3, 1924 CTA Salmon 1924 Pictures - Codes AGO Art Gallery of Ontario AO Archives of Ontario CTA City of Toronto Archives DPSA Deer Park School Archives JCK Joan C. Kinsella MTL Metropolitan Toronto Library NAC National Archives of Canada TPLA Toronto Public Library Archives TTCA Toronto Transit Commission Archives ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Woodlawn. Brother Michael O'Reilly, ES.C. and Brother Donald Morgan ES.C. of De La This is the fifth booklet in the Toronto Public Salle College "Oaklands" were most helpful library Board's series of historical walking in providing information.
    [Show full text]
  • The VIA 1-4-10 Plan a Recovery Strategy for Canada’S Rail Passenger Service
    The VIA 1-4-10 Plan A Recovery Strategy for Canada’s Rail Passenger Service For Transport AcAon Canada By Greg Gormick On Track Strategies November 6, 2015 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................iv Execu:ve Summary......................................................................................................v 1.0 Se@ng a New Course for VIA.................................................................................1 2.0 The Founda:on of VIA’s Recovery.........................................................................3 2.1 A New Rail Passenger Ac:on Force...................................................................4 2.2 A Reformed and Informed Board of Directors...................................................6 2.3 Managerial Redirec:on.....................................................................................7 2.4 A Clear Legisla:ve Mandate............................................................................10 3.0 Overhauling the Freight Railway Rela:onship.....................................................15 4.0 Modernizing VIA’s Fleet.......................................................................................23 4.1 Rolling Stock...................................................................................................26 4.2 Mo:ve Power.................................................................................................30 4.3 Fleet Procurement..........................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020
    New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 Contents Introduction 1 The Case for Change 4 Investment Option 12 Strategic Case 18 Economic Case 31 Financial Case 37 Deliverability and Operations Case 41 Business Case Summary 45 iv Executive Summary Introduction The Town of Milton in association with a landowner’s group (the Proponent) approached Metrolinx to assess the opportunity to develop a new GO rail station on the south side of the Milton Corridor, west of Trafalgar Road. This market-driven initiative assumes the proposed station would be planned and paid for by the private sector. Once built, the station would be transferred to Metrolinx who would own and operate it. The proposed station location is on undeveloped land, at the heart of both the Trafalgar Corridor and Agerton Employment Secondary Plan Areas studied by the Town of Milton in 2017. As such, the project offers the Town of Milton the opportunity to realize an attractive and vibrant transit-oriented community that has the potential to benefit the entire region. Option for Analysis This Initial Business Case (IBC) assesses a single option for the proposed station. The opening-day concept plan includes one new side platform to the north of the corridor, with protection for a future second platform to the south. The site includes 1,000 parking spots, a passenger pick-up/drop-off area (40 wait spaces, 10 load spaces), bicycle parking (128 covered spaces, 64 secured spaces) and a bus loop including 11 sawtooth bus bays.
    [Show full text]