DOCSLIB.ORG

Kaytora Long

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kaytora Long Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 8, Issue 1 - September / October 2006 Evaluation of Various Mediums for Rearing Bigeyed Bugs Geocoris punctipes (Say) a Beneficial Predator for Controlling Insect Pest Populations Kaytora Long ABSTRACT The bigeyed bug, Geocoris punctipes (Say), is an important beneficial predator in many agricultural systems. It feeds on many stages of insect pests. Three types of mediums were evaluated on Geocoris punctipes to determine which medium will best promote ovipostion (egg laying) and the development of G. punctipes to nymphs and adults. The three mediums evaluated were cotton balls, cotton squares, and polyester/rayon gauze. The experimental design was completely randomized with four replicates per treatment (medium). The results indicate that cotton balls produced the highest number of eggs, nymphs, and adults. This can serve as a rearing material in which G. punctipes will successfully reproduce and develop; therefore, facilitating the rearing of G. punctipes under laboratory conditions. INTRODUCTION Bigeyed bugs, Geocoris spp., are commonly used for biological control of key agricultural pests in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs in the United States. There are several species of Geocoris; however, one of the most common species is G. punctipes (Say). Geocoris spp. feed on all life stages of whiteflies, mites, and aphids (Hagler 2006) and are used for their predatory status on eggs and small larvae of lepidopteran pests. Several studies indicate that G. punctipes are effective predators of insect pests in many agricultural systems (Dumas et al. 1962, McCutcheon & Durant 1999). Geocoris spp. can be produced in large quantities under laboratory conditions, yet information pertaining to their choice of reproductive mediums is unavailable. The ultimate goal of this project was to identify a rearing medium in which bigeyed bugs can successfully reproduce. Therefore, the specific objective of the study was to identify the reproductive medium that will promote the development of G. punctipes eggs and nymphs. This project compared the number of G. punctipes eggs deposited on either cotton balls, cotton squares, or polyester/rayon gauze, and determined which medium best supports egg production; as well as the survival of nymphal bigeyed bugs into adulthood. MATERIALS AND METHODS Geocoris punctipes adults used for this study were taken from a colony maintained in the Fruit and Vegetable Laboratory at the University of Florida, Gainesville, and reared in ventilated containers. Various sizes of containers were used to maintain separation of bigeyed bug adults, newly emerged nymphs, and mediums. Adult containers were 37 x 25 cm in size, nymphal containers were 20 x 20 cm, and newly emerged/ medium containers were 13 x 13 cm. Colonies were maintained by adding water in the form of water soaked-cotton wicks, green beans, and Ephestia kuehniella Keller eggs as a food source. All containers had shredded wax paper to serve as hiding places for both adults and nymphs. Each adult container had cotton balls, cotton squares, or polyester/rayon gauze provided as ovipositional substrates for the randomly selected 120 adult bigeyed bugs. Cotton balls used in this study were 6.48 cm3 (Wal-Mart, Mentor, OH) [Fig. 1a]. Cotton squares were old-fashioned “diaper cloth” cut into 9.50 x 6.50 cm semi-squares (Gerber Products Company, Fremont, Michigan) [Fig. 1b]. Polyester/ Rayon gauze, used to wrap wounds, was cut into 10.0 x 7.0 cm rectangles (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ.) [Fig. 1c]. Figure 1. Shows the mediums used for the study. Fig. 1a shows the cotton ball medium. Fig. 1b shows the cotton square medium. Fig. 1c shows the polyester/rayon medium. A total of six cotton balls were placed into each adult container and arranged into two bundles, with each bundle on opposite sides of the adult container. For the second treatment, a total of two gauze squares were placed on opposite sides of an adult container, and in the third treatment two cotton squares were placed on opposite sides of an adult container. The experiment was replicated four times per treatment in a completely randomized design. Containers that contained the various treatments (cotton balls, cotton squares, polyester/rayon gauze) were kept in and environmental chamber at 22.2 °C with 65.3% RH with 14:10 light:dark period, respectively. Cotton balls, cotton squares, and polyester/rayon gauze were removed from Environmental Chamber 1 every seven days. Once the mediums were collected bigeyed bug eggs were counted, and placed into the 13 x 13 cm containers that corresponded to the date the substrates were counted. Water-soaked cotton wicks, green beans, and Ephestia kuehniella Keller eggs were provided as food sources in the new containers. The mediums were maintained in ventilated containers for a period of 14 days. Each medium was sprayed with 1ml of deionized water every two days to maintain moisture. The length of time eggs took to hatch was three to four days. Upon the end of the incubation period, newly emerged bigeyed bugs were counted and nymphs were separated into containers according to the type of medium in which they emerged. This process was repeated each week for a total of 14 days. Nymphs taken from the initial seven day counts were transferred into larger, 20 x 20 ventilated containers and incubated in a second environmental chamber at an average of 22.2 °C and 65.3% RH. Nymphal food sources remained the same as adults. Seven days later these insects were recounted to determine if they survived for at least 14 days from their initial emergence. Therefore, the surviving nymphs were assumed to reach adulthood. RESULTS & DISCUSSION Eggs Throughout the period of evaluation, G. punctipes laid significantly more eggs on cotton balls than on cotton squares or polyester/rayon gauze (Fig. 2). The mean number of eggs laid on cotton balls in June, July, and August was 854.6 ± 124.0, 720.8 ± 103.2, and 619.4 ± 71, respectively. In September, eggs laid on cotton balls dropped significantly to 363.8 ± 57.7 and the decline continued until November (243.8 ± 42.0) when the study was completed (Fig. 2). The reason for this decline was unclear; however, a study conducted by Ruberson, et al. (2001) found that there are no notable developmental effects of photoperiods in embryonic or nymphal stages when kept at 14:10 light:dark period. Figure 2. Eggs laid by bigeyed bugs in various mediums (June - November) *Bars followed by the same letter are not significantly different using LSD mean separation α = 0.05 In this study, cotton balls, cotton squares, and polyester/rayon gauze were incubated at an average of 22.2 °C and 65.3% RH. The environmental chamber was maintained at a 14:10 (LD) photoperiod, which is ideal for bigeyed bug reproduction. Therefore, fecundity on the mediums studied was not affected by the photoperiod or temperature. The results of the cotton squares and the polyester/rayon gauze did not show a significant difference in the amount of eggs laid except for the mouth of August. The number of eggs laid on the cotton squares and the polyester/rayon gauze was generally low. The highest number of eggs laid on cotton squares was in June at 210.0 ± 79.1, and the highest number of eggs laid on the polyester/rayon gauze was also in June at 140.2 ± 37.80 (Fig. 2). Overall, there was a significant difference among all treatments cotton balls (529.9 ± 55.8), cotton squares (141.5 ± 18.2), and polyester/rayon gauze (91.4 ± 11.2) (F = 38.89; df = 2, 70; P < 0.0001). Nymphs Significantly more nymphs emerged from eggs laid on the cotton balls throughout the entire observation period except in August when there was no significant difference between cotton squares and polyester/rayon gauze (F = 31.64; df = 2, 165; P < 0.001) (Fig 3). Overall, approximately five times as many nymphs were produced on cotton balls compared with the other mediums evaluated. There were no significant differences among the number of eggs laid on cotton squares and polyester/rayon gauze throughout the observational period (Fig. 3). Figure 3. Nymphs emerged from various mediums (June - November) *Bars followed by the same letter are not significantly different using LSD mean separation α=0.05. Adults More than 70% of nymphs reared from cotton balls made it to the adult stage. The percentage of adults that resulted from cotton squares and polyester/rayon gauze was significantly less than cotton balls. CONCLUSION Although G. punctipes are widely known predaceous species, reproductive habits are unknown. This study has shown that the bigeyed bug’s artificial medium of choice is cotton balls. Their preference may be due to the female’s natural instinctive ability to protect her eggs from natural enemies. My observation of the cotton balls noted that the eggs were deposited deep into the substrate where they cannot be eaten by other predators. In this experiment cannibalism of the bigeyed bugs was observed. Predation of their own eggs was not recorded, although empty chorions appeared in all three mediums. Cohen (1985) indicated that adult and nymphal G. punctipes are frequently observed probing eggs of their own species even when they are provided with natural diets. The use of cotton balls as an ovipositional substrate will facilitate the rearing of G. punctipes under laboratory conditions. The difference in the number of eggs laid on cotton balls compared with the cotton squares and polyester/rayon gauze can be attributed to the structure of the material. The structure of the cotton ball is less dense than either the cotton squares or the polyester/rayon gauze. The cotton fiber is loosely woven into a more open, “fluffy” ball, in contrast to the tightly woven material of woven cotton fibers and polyester/rayon gauze.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Article Ecological Observations of Native Geocoris Pallens and G
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2013, Article ID 465108, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/465108 Research Article Ecological Observations of Native Geocoris pallens and G. punctipes Populations in the Great Basin Desert of Southwestern Utah Meredith C. Schuman, Danny Kessler, and Ian T. Baldwin Department of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoll-Straße¨ 8, 07745 Jena, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Ian T. Baldwin; [email protected] Received 5 November 2012; Accepted 16 April 2013 Academic Editor: David G. James Copyright © 2013 Meredith C. Schuman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Big-eyed bugs (Geocoris spp. Fallen,´ Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) are ubiquitous, omnivorous insect predators whose plant feeding behavior raises the question of whether they benefit or harm plants. However, several studies have investigated both the potential of Geocoris spp. to serve as biological control agents in agriculture and their importance as agents of plant indirect defense in nature. These studies have demonstrated that Geocoris spp. effectively reduce herbivore populations and increase plant yield. Previous work has also indicated that Geocoris spp. respond to visual and olfactory cues when foraging and choosing their prey and that associative learning of prey and plant cues informs their foraging strategies. For these reasons, Geocoris spp. have become models for the study of tritrophic plant-herbivore-predator interactions. Here, we present detailed images and ecological observations of G. pallens Stal˚ and G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Two Seed Bugs, Geocoris
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO SEED BUGS, GEOCORIS BULLATUS (SAY) AND G. DISCOPTERUS STAL (HEMIPTERA: LYGAEIDAE) IN THE YUKON. By JENNIFER J. ROBINSON B.Sc. Trent University, 1980 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY We accept this thesis as conforming te trie required standard June, 1985 (c) Jennifer J. Robinson, 1985 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 )E-6 C3/81) Abstract Geocoris bullatus (Say 1831), (Henriptera: Lygaeidae) has been collected and studied across North America but the present work is the o first detailed study of western North American CL discopterus Stal 1874. In fact, it has been claimed that 6^. discopterus is solely a species of the east. As the two species are taxonomically difficult to separate, when they were apparently discovered together at several localities in the southwestern Yukon, a detailed investigation of their systematics and distribution seemed necessary. Species status of Yukon Q. bullatus and iG.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Insect Pests in the Tropics - M
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT – Vol. III - Biological Control of Insect Pests In The Tropics - M. V. Sampaio, V. H. P. Bueno, L. C. P. Silveira and A. M. Auad BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INSECT PESTS IN THE TROPICS M. V. Sampaio Instituto de Ciências Agrária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brazil V. H. P. Bueno and L. C. P. Silveira Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brazil A. M. Auad Embrapa Gado de Leite, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Brazil Keywords: Augmentative biological control, bacteria, classical biological control, conservation of natural enemies, fungi, insect, mite, natural enemy, nematode, predator, parasitoid, pathogen, virus. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Natural enemies of insects and mites 2.1. Entomophagous 2.1.1. Predators 2.1.2. Parasitoids 2.2. Entomopathogens 2.2.1. Fungi 2.2.2. Bacteria 2.2.3. Viruses 2.2.4. Nematodes 3. Categories of biological control 3.1. Natural Biological Control 3.2. Applied Biological Control 3.2.1. Classical Biological Control 3.2.2. Augmentative Biological Control 3.2.3. Conservation of Natural Enemies 4. Conclusions Glossary UNESCO – EOLSS Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary SAMPLE CHAPTERS Biological control is a pest control method with low environmental impact and small contamination risk for humans, domestic animals and the environment. Several success cases of biological control can be found in the tropics around the world. The classical biological control has been applied with greater emphasis in Australia and Latin America, with many success cases of exotic natural enemies’ introduction for the control of exotic pests. Augmentative biocontrol is used in extensive areas in Latin America, especially in the cultures of sugar cane, coffee, and soybeans.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus Occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris Uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2008 Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) J. D. Carstens University of Nebraska-Lincoln Frederick P. Baxendale University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Tiffany Heng-Moss University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Robert J. Wright University of Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Carstens, J. D.; Baxendale, Frederick P.; Heng-Moss, Tiffany; and Wright, Robert J., "Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)" (2008). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 157. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/157 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. JOURNAL OF THE KANSAS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 81(4), 2008, pp. 328–338 Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) J. D. CARSTENS,F.P.BAXENDALE,T.M.HENG-MOSS, AND R. J. WRIGHT Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583 ABSTRACT: Big-eyed bugs have been well documented as predators on a diverse group of arthropod prey in turfgrasses; however, little is known about the big-eyed bug species associated with buffalograss, or their feeding habits relative to the western chinch bug, Blissus occiduus Barber.
    [Show full text]
  • Geocoris Punctipes</Emphasis>
    EntomoL exp. appl. 64: 195-202, 1992. 1992 Kluwer Academic Pubhshers. Printed & Belgium. 195 Geocoris punctipes as a predator of Bemisia tabaci: a laboratory evaluation A. C Cohen I & D. N. Byrne2 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agr&ultural Research Service Western Cotton Research Laboratory, 4135 E. Broadway Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85040, USA; 2Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Accepted: February 28, 1989 Key words: Geocoris, Bemisia, predator, handling time Abstract Geocoris punctipes (Say), a predaceous lygaeid not previously documented as a whitefly predator, was tested in the laboratory as a natural enemy of the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.). Its stalking behavior with whiteflies as prey was similar to that observed with aphids. A previously unob- served behavior was noted that involves the predators using salivary secretions to fasten the wings of prey to various surfaces, allowing labial probing and feeding. Prey consumption as a function of prey number appeared to follow the pattern of the Holling type II functional response. Handling time per prey item ranged from about 180 to 240 seconds. No changes were observed in handling time devoted to earlier versus later catches. Nutritional quality of whiteflies was measured using crude protein, lipids and carbohydrates as criteria. Performance, in terms of predator behavior, total daily handling time, func- tional response, energy budget and nutritional quality all support the hypothesis that G. punctipes is a promising candidate for biological control of sweet potato whiteflies. Introduction with photosynthesis (Perkins, 1983). These facts indicate a great need for effective control strate- The sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) gies.
    [Show full text]
  • A B C D E F G
    8/2011! A jee•AH•kor•is, Big-eyed Bugs Have Big Appetite for Pests Peter Asiimwe, Lydia Brown, Tim Vandervoet, Peter Ellsworth (University of Arizona) & Steven Naranjo (USDA-ARS, ALARC) Dykinga Geocoris punctipes Geocoris (Family: Geocoridae) are important predators feeding on whiteflies found throughout the United States in agricultural crops. USDA, Jack They are commonly known as “big-eyed bugs” due to the B C Eyespots on characteristic large, prominent, widely separated eyes on maturing the sides of their heads (A). They actively hunt their Geocoris egg victims, and their big eyes give them a wide field of vision and boost their ability to locate prey. Geocoris use a long Whitefly straw-like beak to stab and kill their prey before sucking up cadaver fed on & evacuated by the liquefied contents, leaving behind a hollow cadaver (B). Geocoris Geocoris deposit eggs singly and horizontally on leaf or Geocoris D E pallens adult stem surfaces. These hot-dog shaped eggs are distinguished on cotton from other insect eggs by the presence of two red eyespots flower False chinch near the tip (C). Predatory stages include five nymphal bug in instars and a winged adult. Nymphs look similar to adults sweepnet but are smaller and lack wings. False chinch bugs, a closely related insect with decidedly plant-feeding tendencies, can sometimes be confused with Geocoris (D). They are more slender than big-eyed bugs and have less pronounced eyes. F Geocoris In Arizona cotton, Geocoris feed on all stages of whitefly, th punctipes 5 instar adult Lygus nymphs, thrips, lepidopteran eggs and small larvae, Lygus and mites, as well as other beneficial species.
    [Show full text]
  • E0020 Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops
    Common Beneficial Arthropods Found in Field Crops There are hundreds of species of insects and spi- mon in fields that have not been sprayed for ders that attack arthropod pests found in cotton, pests. When scouting, be aware that assassin bugs corn, soybeans, and other field crops. This publi- can deliver a painful bite. cation presents a few common and representative examples. With few exceptions, these beneficial Description and Biology arthropods are native and common in the south- The most common species of assassin bugs ern United States. The cumulative value of insect found in row crops (e.g., Zelus species) are one- predators and parasitoids should not be underes- half to three-fourths of an inch long and have an timated, and this publication does not address elongate head that is often cocked slightly important diseases that also attack insect and upward. A long beak originates from the front of mite pests. Without biological control, many pest the head and curves under the body. Most range populations would routinely reach epidemic lev- in color from light brownish-green to dark els in field crops. Insecticide applications typical- brown. Periodically, the adult female lays cylin- ly reduce populations of beneficial insects, often drical brown eggs in clusters. Nymphs are wing- resulting in secondary pest outbreaks. For this less and smaller than adults but otherwise simi- reason, you should use insecticides only when lar in appearance. Assassin bugs can easily be pest populations cannot be controlled with natu- confused with damsel bugs, but damsel bugs are ral and biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Enemies of Spider Mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Cotton: Density Regulation Or Casual Association?
    Natural Enemies of Spider Mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Cotton: Density Regulation or Casual Association? L. T. WILSON,' P. J. TRICHILO,' AND D. GONZALEZ2 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 Environ. Entomol. 20(3): 849-856 (1991) ABSTRACT This study addresses the potential impact of natural enemies on the abundance of spider mites, Tetranychus spy., on cotton in the San Joaquin Valley of California. These natural enemies are omnivorous predators, and include the big-eyed bug, Geocoris pallens StAl and G. punctipes (Say), the minute pirate bug, Orius trfsticolor (White),and the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Simple linear regression suggested that omnivorous predators were potentially effective in delaying the buildup of spider mites, with the highest rz (0.65) recorded for adult F. occidentalis. Geocoris showed the potential to suppress the rate of spider mite population increase (rl = 0.73). All three tested predator species exhibited the capacity to suppress early season spider mite abundance, with the highest r2 (0.62) recorded for Ceocoris and Orius. Predators were also potentially able to suppress mid- to late-season spider mite populations. Multiple regression analysis indicated a significant negative correlation between mid- to late-season spider mite abundance and early season predators. Results from a second year were less conclusive, suggesting that the reduced range of spider mite abundance limited our ability to discern potentially significant interactions during that year. KEY WORDS Insecta, Cossypium, Tetranychus, predators SPIDERMITES, Tetranychus spp. can cause serious Several mechanisms have been suggested to ex- economic injury to cotton, Gossypium hirsutum plain the spider mite-insecticide phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Insects Treasure Coast Chapter Rare Fruit Club
    Beneficial Insects Treasure Coast Chapter Rare Fruit Club Bill Schall Palm Beach County Extension 531 N. Military Trail West Palm Beach, Fl 561.233.1725 U F ufufufuufufufufufufufu U fufufufufufuf F ufufufufufuf Photo: UF Schall ufufufuf A Little Review from Last Time Photo: UF Office of Sustainability Insects with Piercing/Sucking Mouthparts APHIDS TRUE BUGS THRIPS SCALES MEALYBUGS WHITEFLY Photos by Glenn, UF Insects with Chewing Mouthparts UF UF BEETLE LARVAE GRASSHOPPERS CATERPILLARS UF-Glenn UF-Glenn UF-Glenn BEETLES/WEEVILS http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/HS/HS17700.pdf Types of Beneficials Mites, Insects, Diseases & Nematodes – Predators – Parasitoids – Insect Diseases – Beneficial Nematodes – Developing refugia in your yard – Products that are softer on beneficials Some Key Points . Many beneficials already in environment . Some can be purchased . Beneficials work best when you do not have to control a huge pest population . Predators better than parasitoids in responding to large pest populations . Some beneficials “generalists,” by many very specific to pest – especially parasitoids Some Key Points . Probably best strategy for you is develop refugia & use products and techniques that are less damaging to beneficials . Lots & lots of activity occurring below noticeable levels . Do not want to confuse “good” with “bad” insects – especially when they show up to attack pests that are actually causing the plant decline Minute Pirate Bug (Orius) Photo: John Ruberson, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org Georgia, ofUniversity Ruberson, John Photo: Orius feeding on insect egg Minute Pirate Bug (Orius) Photo: John Ruberson, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org . Good for small insects, especially thrips . Can be up purchased commercially . Sunflowers (even Mexican sunflower) provides refuge for non pest thrips & therefore Orius Sikora, Auburn Sikora, University, Bugwood.org University, Photo: Edward Edward Photo: Minute Pirate Bug (Orius) Life History: One generation takes 20 days to complete, multiple generations per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraguild Predation of Orius Tristicolor by Geocoris Spp. and the Paradox of Irruptive Spider Mite Dynamics in California Cotton
    Biological Control 32 (2005) 172–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Intraguild predation of Orius tristicolor by Geocoris spp. and the paradox of irruptive spider mite dynamics in California cotton Jay A. Rosenheim¤ Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States Received 12 May 2004; accepted 15 September 2004 Abstract It is paradoxical when a community of several natural enemies fails to control a pest population when it can be shown experimen- tally that single members of the natural enemy community are eVective control agents when tested individually. This is the case for spider mites, Tetranychus spp., in California cotton. Spider mites exhibit irruptive population dynamics despite that fact that experi- ments have shown that there are at least four predators (Galendromus occidentalis, Frankliniella occidentalis, Orius tristicolor, and Geocoris spp.) that, when tested singly, can suppress mite populations. One possible explanation for the paradox is intraguild preda- tion, wherein one predator consumes another. Here, I evaluate the hypothesis that intraguild predation is a strong interaction among spider mite predators. I report manipulative Weld experiments, focal observations of freely foraging predators in the Weld, and popu- lation survey data that suggest that the minute pirate bug O. tristicolor, is subject to strong predation by other members of the pred- ator community, and in particular by Geocoris spp. These results, combined with the results of prior work, suggest that pervasive intraguild predation among spider mite predators may explain the pest status of Tetranychus spp. in cotton. 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Intraguild predation; Predator–predator interactions; Herbivore population suppression; Spider mites; Orius tristicolor; Geocoris pallens; Geocoris punctipes; Tetranychus spp.; Chrysoperla spp.; Nabis spp.; Zelus renardii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera Exigua (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 J
    EENY105 Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 J. L. Capinera2 Introduction and Distribution The beet armyworm originated in Southeast Asia. It was first discovered in North America about 1876, when it was found in Oregon, and it reached Florida in 1924. It rarely overwinters in areas where frost kills its host plants. Thus, overwintering is generally limited to Arizona, Florida, and Texas. Nevertheless, beet armyworm invades the southern half of the United States (Maryland to Colorado to north- ern California, and south) annually. Except in greenhouses, it rarely is a pest except in southern states. Description and Life Cycle Figure 1. Newly hatched larva of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera Seasonal activity varies considerably according to climate. exigua (Hübner). In warm locations such as Florida, all stages can be found Credits: Lyle Buss, UF/IFAS throughout the year, although development rate and overall abundance are reduced during the winter months (Tingle Egg and Mitchell 1977). The life cycle can be completed in as Eggs are laid in clusters of 50 to 150 eggs per mass. Normal few as 24 days, and six generations have been reared during egg production is about 300 to 600 per female. Eggs are five months of summer weather in Florida (Wilson 1934). usually deposited on the lower surface of the leaf, and often near blossoms and the tip of the branch. The individual eggs are circular when viewed from above, but when examined from the side the egg is slightly peaked, tapering to a point. The eggs are greenish to white in color, and covered with a layer of whitish scales that gives the egg mass a fuzzy or cottony appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Abundance of Thrips, Whitefly and Their Natural Enemy
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(1): 509-515 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Occurrence and abundance of thrips, whitefly and JEZS 2016; 4(1): 509-515 © 2016 JEZS their natural enemy, Geocoris Spp. on cotton crop Received: 16-12-2015 Accepted: 18-01-2016 at various localities of Sindh, Pakistan Muhmmad Siddique Khanzada Department of Entomology, Muhammad Siddique Khanzada, Tajwar Sultana Syed, Shagufta Rani Sindh Agriculture University Khanzada, Ghulam Husssain Abro, Muhammad Salman, Sajjad Anwar, Tandojam-70050, Pakistan. Muhammad Sarwar, Adeel Aslam Perzada, Su Wang, Azmat Hussain Abro Tajwar Sultana Syed Department of Entomology, Abstract Sindh Agriculture University Present studies were carried out on occurrence and abundance of insect pests, thrips, Thrips tabaci, Tandojam-70050, Pakistan. whitefly, Bemesia tabaci and their predator, Geocoris spp., on cotton, Gossypum arborium L. Results revealed that thrips, whitefly and their natural enemy populations varied with different dates and plant’s Shagufta Rani Khanzada Department of Entomology, phenology. At Tando Allahyar, thrips and whitefly population was very low (3.00+0.15, 1.00+0.35 per nd Sindh Agriculture University leaf) in 2 week of April, but peaked during last week of July (75.6+0.78, 24.45+55), respectively. rd Tandojam-70050, Pakistan. Predator, Geocoris remained minimum (1.00+0.14) in 3 week of April and maximum (12.00+0.85) in last week of July. Likewise at Crop Protection Field, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, thrips and Ghulam Husssain Abro whitefly population was minimum in 1st week of May (15.55+0.52, 5.56+0.42) and reached at peak Department of Entomology, (191.6±0.85, 91.6±0.85), respectively on last week of August.
    [Show full text]