Tajikistan Disaster Risk Profile

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tajikistan Disaster Risk Profile Emergency and Disaster Reports 2018; 5 (3): 3-48 Emergency and Disaster Reports ISSN 2340-9932 Vol 5, Num 3, 2018 Monographic issue Tajikistan Disaster Risk Profile Zaripova Manizha Emergency and Disaster Reports 2018; 5 (3): 3-48 Letter from the editors The Emergency and Disaster Reports is a journal edited by the Unit for Research in Emergency and Disaster of the Department of Medicine of the University of Oviedo aimed to introduce research papers, monographic reviews and technical reports related to the fields of Medicine and Public Health in the contexts of emergency and disaster. Both situations are events that can deeply affect the health, the economy, the environment and the development of the affected populations. The topics covered by the journal include a wide range of issues related to the different dimensions of the phenomena of emergency and disaster, ranging from the study of the risk factors, patterns of frequency and distribution, characteristics, impacts, prevention, preparedness, mitigation, response, humanitarian aid, standards of intervention, operative research, recovery, rehabilitation, resilience and policies, strategies and actions to address these phenomena from a risk reduction approach. In the last thirty years has been substantial progress in the above mentioned areas in part thanks to a better scientific knowledge of the subject. The aim of the journal is to contribute to this progress facilitating the dissemination of the results of research in this field. This monographic issue is about disaster risk profile of Tajikistan. Tajikistan is in South-east part of Central Asia and is a former republic of the Soviet Union. It borders Afghanistan to the south, Uzbekistan to the west, Kyrgyzstan to the north, and China to the east. Tajikistan has an area of 143,100 square kilometers, of which 400 square kilometers is water. Tajikistan is prone to many types of natural hazards, including floods, mudflows, landslides (mudslides), epidemics, drought, earthquakes, avalanches, insect infestation and wind storm. According to the World Bank, each year Tajikistan experiences around 50,000 landslides, some 5,000 tremors and earthquakes, and hundreds of avalanches and debris flows. The present monographic issue assessed the impact of the main natural disasters happened during the last 50 years (1966 – 2016) and the national disaster prevention and response strategies. Prof. Pedro Arcos, Prof. Rafael Castro, Dr. Alexandre Zerbo Editors, Emergency and Disaster Reports Unit for Research in Emergency and Disaster Department of Medicine. University of Oviedo Campus del Cristo 33006 Oviedo –Spain www.uniovi.net/uied Emergency and Disaster Reports 2018; 5 (3): 3-48 Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Summery ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1 COUNTRY OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Location and geography .................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Climate .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Economy ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Health ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2 OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................................................... 8 3 NATURAL HAZARDS AND VULNERABILI .............................................................................................. 9 3.1 Hazards .............................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Earthquakes ....................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Landslides ........................................................................................................................................ 10 3.4 Floods and mudflows ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Snow avalanches ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.6 Epidemic .......................................................................................................................................... 12 3.7 Heavy snowfall and rainfall ............................................................................................................. 12 3.8 Dust storms ..................................................................................................................................... 12 3.9 Hailstones ........................................................................................................................................ 13 4 TOP MAJOR DISASTERS AND IMPACTS ............................................................................................. 14 5 DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Legal system, legal framework ........................................................................................................ 22 5.2 Structure of disaster management ................................................................................................. 22 5.3 Priority on disaster risk management ............................................................................................. 23 6 DISASTER MANAHMENT PLAN ......................................................................................................... 24 7 BUDGET SIZE ON NATIONAL LEVEL ................................................................................................... 25 8 PROGRESS AND SITUATION OF THE HYOGO FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION(HFA) .................................. 26 8.1 Identification, assessment and monitoring of risks in emergency situations ................................. 27 8.2 Reduction of the basic risk factors .................................................................................................. 28 8.3 Enhancement of disaster preparedness for effective actions ......................................................... 28 8.4 International cooperation ............................................................................................................... 28 9 PROJECTS ON DISASTER REDUCTION HEADED BY THE MINISTRY ...................................................... 30 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................................................................................................................. 31 10.1 Land degradation ............................................................................................................................ 31 10.2 Water and sanitation ....................................................................................................................... 31 10.3 Lake Sarez – Time Bomb .................................................................................................................. 32 10.4 Glacial melt ....................................................................................................................................... 41 11 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 45 Referense ........................................................................................................................................................ 46 1 Emergency and Disaster Reports 2018; 5 (3): 3-48 Abbreviations RT Republic of Tajikistan UNDP United Nations Development Programme GDP Gross Domestic Product RAOUES Unified Energy System of Russia WHO World Health Organization UNDAC United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program GBAO Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region IFRC The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies REACT Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team NGO Non-Governmental Organization MoES The Ministry of Emergency Situations and Civil Defense ISDR The International Strategy for Disaster Reduction UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children's Emergency Fund UNHCR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees WFP World Food Programme IDNDR International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction OCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs GIS Geographic Information System USGS United States Geological Survey GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map 2 Emergency and Disaster Reports 2018; 5 (3): 3-48 Summery Tajikistan is a beautiful land-locked mountainous country in Central Asia. It is rich in history and culture, and is home to thousands of glaciers and glacial lakes, small and large rivers that provide water to neighbouring Uzbekistan and Afghanistan, fertile valleys
Recommended publications
  • Aga Khan Agency for Habitat Provides Refresher Courses for Certs
    Enhancing readiness of emergency response volunteers in Tajikistan Aga Khan Agency for Habitat provides refresher courses for CERTs Rasht, Tajikistan, 23 April 2020 – The Aga Khan Agency for Habitat (AKAH) Tajikistan, through the financial support of the Government of Switzerland, completed refresher trainings for the Community Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) formed in Rasht valley. The trainings, which were conducted within the Integrated Health and Habitat Improvement (IHHI) project, are designed to enhance the readiness of the CERTs to respond to emergency situations across the Districts of Republican Subordination. The training prepares the volunteers to be the first responders in the event of a disaster. It capitalises on their knowledge of the terrain, language and culture, as captured by trainer Munira Qurbonmamadova, “Our approach is tailored to the cultural dynamics in each area. For example, in Shashvolon, we held a separate training for the women, which was very well received.” Shukrona, a local nurse and committed community volunteer who helped mobilise her fellow women volunteers agrees, “The training offered a safe place to learn freely and to practice. Women constitute a significant number of our communities so it’s important that their specific needs are considered in emergency response.” The trainings were undertaken in seven villages of Rasht, Roghun, Lakhsh, Tojikobod, Fayzobod, Nurobod, and Sangvor districts from 17 to 20 April. A total of 210 participants (equal representation of men and women) successfully concluded the two-day training, acquiring renewed theoretical knowledge and practical experience on first aid, Incident Command System (ICS), and search and rescue. They also enhanced techniques in bleeding prevention, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and victim transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • REACT Meeting Minute
    Committee of Emergency Situations & Civil Defense, ECHO and UNDP Tajikistan Project “Strengthened Disaster Risk Management in Tajikistan” Minutes of the REACT Meeting 12 March 2010, UN Conference Hall Chair: Mr. Khaybullo Latipov, Chairman, Committee of Emergency Situations and Civil Defense (CoES) Participants: REACT partners (Annex I- attached) 1. Introduction Mr. Latipov, opened the meeting and welcomed all the participants. 2. Government recovery action plan in Vanj district: • Committee of Emergency Situations and Civil Defense Mr. Latipov, chairman of CoES, briefed participants that following the earthquake occurred in Vanj district on January 2nd, 2010, overall 5 different meetings with REACT partners have been convened covering issues related to Vanj earthquake response and recovery operations: 1) January 5, 2010 – Extraordinary REACT meeting; 2) January 8, 2010 – Meeting with the first deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs; 3) January 20, 2010 – Regular REACT meeting; 4) February 10, 2010 – Regular REACT meeting; 5) February 18, 2010 – Early Recovery Planning meeting. As of disaster occurrence date up to this date, following response measures have been undertaken by the Government of Tajikistan: - Governmental Commission under the chairmanship of Prime Minister has visited the disaster site on January 2010; - Assessment of the caused damage has been conducted; - Affected households identified and list finalized; - Delivery of tents to the disaster site organized; - Land plot identified for relocation of the population and engineering-geological assessment conducted; - Master Plan of the new settlement, design of the water supply and electricity supply system developed; Mr. Latipov announced that representatives of specialized state agencies, responsible for recovery actions in Vanj district have been invited to the meeting and passed the floor to invited representatives for more detailed briefing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rogun Dam—Path to Energy Independence Or Security Threat?
    Sustainability 2011, 3, 1573-1592; doi:10.3390/su3091573 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Rogun Dam—Path to Energy Independence or Security Threat? Bahtiyor R. Eshchanov 1,*, Mona Grinwis Plaat Stultjes 1, Sanaatbek K. Salaev 2 and Ruzumboy A. Eshchanov 2 1 Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Urgench State University, Hamid Alimjan street 14, Urgench, Khorezm 220100, Uzbekistan; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.A.E.); [email protected] (S.K.S.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-488-255-166. Received: 26 August 2011; in revised form: 10 September 2011 / Accepted: 14 September 2011 / Published: 22 September 2011 Abstract: The revitalization of the Rogun hydropower station project and launch of an Initial Public Offering has led the water-energy disputes between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to a new stage. While two riparian states advocate their positions from their own perspective, it gives the impression of being a “prisoners’ dilemma” case from a regional cooperation point. This paper aims to review the decision of project revitalization from the unconventional security perspective, focusing mainly on its impact on Tajikistan. The scope will be limited to economic, energy, social and political security. The paper attempts to reveal the existing unconventional security threats and suggest possible solutions for the arising problems. Keywords: water-energy trade-off; unconventional security; opportunity costs; Tajikistan; Uzbekistan; Central Asia 1. Introduction How to adequately meet growing energy needs is a vital question for every nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Ecological Aspects of the Water Resources Management of the Transboundary Rivers of Central Asia
    Evolving Water Resources Systems: Understanding, Predicting and Managing Water–Society Interactions 441 Proceedings of ICWRS2014, Bologna, Italy, June 2014 (IAHS Publ. 364, 2014). Social and ecological aspects of the water resources management of the transboundary rivers of Central Asia PARVIZ NORMATOV Tajik National University, 17 Rudaki Ave, Dushanbe, 734025, Tajikistan [email protected] Abstract The Zeravshan River is a transboundary river whose water is mainly used for irrigation of agricultural lands of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Sufficiently rich hydropower resources in upstream of the Zeravshan River characterize the Republic of Tajikistan. Continuous monitoring of water resources condition is necessary for planning the development of this area taking into account hydropower production and irrigation needs. Water quality of Zeravshan River is currently one of the main problems in the relationship between the Republics of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, and it frequently triggers conflict situations between the two countries. In most cases, the problem of water quality of the Zeravshan River is related to river pollution by wastewater of the Anzob Mountain-concentrating Industrial Complex (AMCC) in Tajikistan. In this paper results of research of chemical and bacteriological composition of the Zeravshan River waters are presented. The minimum impact of AMCC on quality of water of the river was experimentally established. Key words transboundary; Central Asia; water reservoir; pollution; heavy metals; water quality INTRODUCTION Water resources in the Aral Sea Basin, whose territory belongs to five states, are mostly used for irrigation and hydropower engineering. These water users require river runoff to be regulated with different regimes. The aim of the hydropower engineering is the largest power production and, accordingly, the utilization of the major portion of annual runoff of rivers in the winter, the coldest season of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Effects of Land Reform in Tajikistan
    FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No. 2008-1 The Economic Effects of Land Reform in Tajikistan Zvi Lerman and David Sedik October 2008 The Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia of the Food and Agriculture Organization distributes this policy study to disseminate findings of work in progress and to encourage the exchange of ideas within FAO and all others interested in development issues. This paper carries the name of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, its management, or any member countries. Zvi Lerman is Sir Henry d’Avigdor Goldsmid Professor of Agricultural Economics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel David Sedik is the Senior Agricultural Policy Officer in the FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. Contents Executive summary . 1 1. Introduction: purpose of the study. 5 2. Agriculture in Tajikistan. 7 2.1. Geography of agriculture in Tajikistan. 8 Agro-climatic zones of Tajikistan. 10 Regional structure of agriculture. 13 2.2. Agricultural transition in Tajikistan: changes in output and inputs. 15 Agricultural land. 16 Agricultural labor. 17 Livestock. 17 Farm machinery. 19 Fertilizer use. 19 3. Land reform legislation and changes in land tenure in Tajikistan. 21 3.1. Legal framework for land reform and farm reorganization. 21 3.2. Changes in farm structure and land tenure since independence. 24 4. The economic effects of land reform . 27 4.1. Recovery of agricultural production in Tajikistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Extremism and Insurgency in Tajikistan: a Risk Assessment
    VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND INSURGENCY IN TAJIKISTAN: A RISK ASSESSMENT AUGUST 14, 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Dr. Eric McGlinchey for Management Systems International for USAID’s Office of Technical Support in the Bureau for the Middle East (USAID/ME/TS). VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND INSURGENCY IN TAJIKISTAN: A RISK ASSESSMENT DRAFT Contracted under AID-OAA-TO-11-00051 Democracy and Governance and Peace and Security in Asia and the Middle East Dr. Eric McGlinchey is Associate Professor of Politics and Government in the Department of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University. He is an expert in Central Asian regime change, comparative politics, and political Islam. He is the author of Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... i Map ............................................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. iii I. Background: The Interplay of Religion and Politics in Tajikistan .....................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 823.55 Kb
    August 2010 | NUMBER 7 Tajikistan Fighting Hunger Worldwide Food Security Monitoring System The Food Security Monitoring System (FSMS)provides a seasonal snapshot of food insecurity in rural Tajikistan by analyzing data from 665 households and the nutritional status of 959 children under 5 and 918 women between 15-49World years old. The Food FSMS can alert Programme to incidents of critical food insecurity and nutrition. Overview of household food security and nutrition between February and August 2010 FOOD SECURITY to drinking and irrigation water and unemployment. • Overall food security situation appears to have improved • Severe food insecurity is confined to natural disaster compared to the previous round, with 7% (down from 10%) affected areas, especially the potato harvest and the loss of the households interviewed classified as severely food of crops in kitchen gardens. stocks and livestock. insecure and 16% moderately food insecure (decreased NUTRITION from 21%). • Malnutrition is at the same levels as last year in July Rural households benefit from a fairly good harvest, but higher than in the UNICEF National Survey due mainly better livestock health and breeding, higher remittances to seasonality. 10% of the children are wasted and 33% and seasonal jobs. are stunted. The main causes remain lack of nutrition • High staple food prices represent the main threat to knowledge of the caretaker, diseases, quality of drinking households’ food security. High prices are mainly due water and hygiene practices. to external factors: speculation of local traders due to • Underweight women represent 7.7% of all the women recent wheat export ban in Russia, reduced harvest in interviewed while 19.5% are overweight.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the File
    Mediating the Conflict in the Rasht Valley, Tajikistan The Hegemonic Narrative and Anti-Hegemonic Challenges Accepted version of an article published in Central Asian Affairs: Lemon, Edward. " Mediating the Conflict in the Rasht Valley, Tajikistan", Central Asian Affairs 1, 2 (2014): 247-272. Edward Lemon Department of Politics, University of Exeter [email protected] Abstract Between 2009 and 2011 Tajikistan experienced one of the worst bouts of political vio- lence since the end of the country’s civil war. The fighting was concentrated in the Rasht Valley, an area traditionally associated with opposition to the regime. As a result, the government attempted to fix the meaning of the conflict around the signifiers “international terrorism” and “radical Islam.” This framing directly reproduced the regime’s hegemony through legitimating the removal of opponents and contrasting the Tajik “self” with the terrorist “other.” The hegemonic narrative was incomplete and contained inconsistencies. As a result, anti- hegemonic actors attempted to under- mine its legitimacy. Although these critical articulations destabilized the narrative, due to their dispersed and divergent nature, it ultimately maintained its hegemonic position. Keywords Tajikistan – terrorism – Islam – conflict – framing On April 15, 2011, Tajik television displayed graphic images of militants killed by government forces during a special operation. The video contained images of illegal weapons caches, mountain hideouts, bomb-making books, and Islamist motifs. The narrator labeled the militants as “international terrorists” (bain- almilli terroriston). He stated that these men wanted to overthrow the government and enforce an Islamic state based on shari’a law in Tajikistan. Long-time government opponent Mullo Abdullo led the group.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FIRST NATIONAL REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Dushanbe – 2003 1 REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FIRST NATIONAL REPORT ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Dushanbe – 2003 3 ББК 28+28.0+45.2+41.2+40.0 Н-35 УДК 502:338:502.171(575.3) NBBC GEF First National Report on Biodiversity Conservation was elaborated by National Biodiversity and Biosafety Center (NBBC) under the guidance of CBD National Focal Point Dr. N.Safarov within the project “Tajikistan Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan”, with financial support of Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Copyright 2003 All rights reserved 4 Author: Dr. Neimatullo Safarov, CBD National Focal Point, Head of National Biodiversity and Biosafety Center With participation of: Dr. of Agricultural Science, Scientific Productive Enterprise «Bogparvar» of Tajik Akhmedov T. Academy of Agricultural Science Ashurov A. Dr. of Biology, Institute of Botany Academy of Science Asrorov I. Dr. of Economy, professor, Institute of Economy Academy of Science Bardashev I. Dr. of Geology, Institute of Geology Academy of Science Boboradjabov B. Dr. of Biology, Tajik State Pedagogical University Dustov S. Dr. of Biology, State Ecological Inspectorate of the Ministry for Nature Protection Dr. of Biology, professor, Institute of Plants Physiology and Genetics Academy Ergashev А. of Science Dr. of Biology, corresponding member of Academy of Science, professor, Institute Gafurov A. of Zoology and Parasitology Academy of Science Gulmakhmadov D. State Land Use Committee of the Republic of Tajikistan Dr. of Biology, Tajik Research Institute of Cattle-Breeding of the Tajik Academy Irgashev T. of Agricultural Science Ismailov M. Dr. of Biology, corresponding member of Academy of Science, professor Khairullaev R.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Profile: Rasht Valley Tajikistan
    Implemented by: Climate Change Profile: Rasht Valley Tajikistan This profile provides an overview of projected climate parameters and related impacts on the agricultural sector in the Rasht Valley, Tajikistan, under different greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenarios. Three GHG emissions scenarios, called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), will be presented: One RCP with a lower emission scenario of RCP2.6, a second RCP with an intermediate emission scenario of RCP6.0, and a third RCP with a higher emission scenario of RCP8.5. By using easy-to-read graphs and texts intended for non-experts, this climate change profile builds on the latest climate data and state-of-the-art modelling. Climate Projections Compared to the 1986-2005 level, the annual Despite an increasing GSL, the agricultural mean temperature is projected to rise between productivity during the growing season is at risk 1.1°C and 6.1°C by 2080, depending on the due to increased temperatures, more frequent future GHG emissions scenario. Under the high and intense heatwaves, as well as decreased emissions scenario, RCP8.5, annual irrigation water availability caused by greater temperatures will increase by approximately 1.7°C in 2030, 2.9°C in 2050, and 5.3°C in evaporation and glacier retreat (especially in late 2080. summer). Rapid and intense climate-induced changes in temperatures and precipitation patterns are Winter precipitation will increase while causing biodiversity loss. This is especially the spring precipitation depicts no trend. case in mountainous areas where the potential for However, based on the same model ensemble, species migration is limited, and the vulnerable heavy rainfall events (>20mm) will further ecosystems are particularly well-adapted to their increase during the spring months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amu Darya River – a Review
    AMARTYA KUMAR BHATTACHARYA and D. M. P. KARTHIK The Amu Darya river – a review Introduction Source confluence Kerki he Amu Darya, also called the Amu river and elevation 326 m (1,070 ft) historically known by its Latin name, Oxus, is a major coordinates 37°06'35"N, 68°18'44"E T river in Central Asia. It is formed by the junction of the Mouth Aral sea Vakhsh and Panj rivers, at Qal`eh-ye Panjeh in Afghanistan, and flows from there north-westwards into the southern remnants location Amu Darya Delta, Uzbekistan of the Aral Sea. In ancient times, the river was regarded as the elevation 28 m (92 ft) boundary between Greater Iran and Turan. coordinates 44°06'30"N, 59°40'52"E In classical antiquity, the river was known as the Oxus in Length 2,620 km (1,628 mi) Latin and Oxos in Greek – a clear derivative of Vakhsh, the Basin 534,739 km 2 (206,464 sq m) name of the largest tributary of the river. In Sanskrit, the river Discharge is also referred to as Vakshu. The Avestan texts too refer to 3 the river as Yakhsha/Vakhsha (and Yakhsha Arta (“upper average 2,525 m /s (89,170 cu ft/s) Yakhsha”) referring to the Jaxartes/Syr Darya twin river to max 5,900 m 3 /s (208,357 cu ft/s) Amu Darya). The name Amu is said to have come from the min 420 m 3 /s (14,832 cu ft/s) medieval city of Amul, (later, Chahar Joy/Charjunow, and now known as Türkmenabat), in modern Turkmenistan, with Darya Description being the Persian word for “river”.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier-Related Hazards and Their Assessment in the Tajik Pamir: a Short Review
    Geographical Studies Vol. 88, No. 2 (2013) Glacier-Related Hazards and Their Assessment in the Tajik Pamir: A Short Review Tetsuya KOMATSU1 and Teiji WATANABE1 Abstract This paper reviews contemporary glacial features, characteristics of documented glacial hazards, and the status of hazard assessment studies in the Pamirs of Tajikistan (hereafter the Tajik Pamir). The review found detachment of a hanging glacier, glacier-surging, and outburst discharge of a glacial lake to be major potential causes of glacial hazards in the Tajik Pamir, especially in the western area (west from approx. 73° E). Guerrilla glacial lakes, which are characterised as glacial lakes on the ice-core moraine that “appear repeatedly,” “enlarge rapidly (within less than one year),” “disappear within less than two years,” “are superficially closed,” and “are of relatively small size (approx. < 106 m2)” should hereafter be paid special attentions. Preparation of appropriate hazard-mitigation activities should re- quire early detection of not only the large crack in the hanging-glacier terminus, surge behaviour, and the glacial lake and guerrilla glacial lake, but also regular monitoring of these hazard factors. One of the most suitable monitoring techniques is to use earth observation satellite images with a relatively short repetitive cycle (ideally once every few days) and a high spatial resolution (ideally several meters). These criteria may be satisfied in the near future by using images captured by many sets of microsatel- lites, such as the 50-kg class microsatellite SPRITE-SAT (RISING). Key words:glacier surge, guerrilla glacial lake, glacial lake outburst floods, hazard assessment, mi- crosatellite, Tajik Pamir Ⅰ.Introduction The Pamir is one of the high mountain Glaciers in high mountain regions benefit regions in Asia, comprising parts of Tajikistan, human activities by serving as sources of drink- Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, and China (Fig.
    [Show full text]