DOCSLIB.ORG

Withholding Some Or All Info

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Withholding Some Or All Info British Broadcasting Corporation Room BC2 B6 Broadcast Centre White City Wood Lane London W12 7TP Telephone 020 8008 2882 Email [email protected] Information Policy & Compliance bbc.co.uk/foi bbc.co.uk/privacy Mr Moran By email to: [email protected] 21st January 2014 Dear Mr Moran, Freedom of Information request – RFI20131965 Thank you for your request to the BBC of 29 December 2013, seeking the following information under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000: “Could you please provide figures for the amount the BBC spent on lawyers to cover up attendees of the BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006? Could you also please provide figures for the amount the BBC spent on BBC Staff time/wages to cover up attendees of the BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006? Could you also please confirm whether the following list of attendees of the BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006 was available on the internet throughout the legal battle to cover it up? January 26th 2006, BBC Television Centre, London Specialists: Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant Trevor Evans, US Embassy Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change Anuradha Vittachi, Director, Oneworld.net Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation Claire Foster, Church of England Saleemul Huq, IIED Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund Matthew Farrow, CBI Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs Joe Smith, The Open University Mark Galloway, Director, IBT Anita Neville, E3G Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University Jos Wheatley, Global Environment Assets Team, DFID Tessa Tennant, Chair, AsRia BBC attendees: Jana Bennett, Director of Television Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science Helen Boaden, Director of News Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News Anne Gilchrist, Executive Editor Indies & Events, CBBC Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment Eleanor Moran, Development Executive, Drama Commissioning Elizabeth McKay, Project Executive, Education Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit Paul Brannan, Deputy Head of News Interactive Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes Frances Weil, Editor of News Special Events” 2 I have addressed each of your questions in turn below. However, before doing so, I have set out some background to the Tribunal case you refer to. In July 2007, the BBC received a request for information it held relating to a seminar held at Television Centre in 2006. The seminar was one in a series which looked at a range of global topics in order to assist the BBC’s journalism. The title of the seminar was “Climate Change, the Challenge to Broadcasting” and was attended by BBC editors, journalists and managers as well as a number of invited guests from business, science and academia. In this regard, the guests were not “a panel.” Seminars such as this do not set BBC editorial policy on how it covers climate science. The setting of editorial policy is a formal process involving BBC Boards and the BBC Trust; it does not take place at seminars such as this one. Instead, the seminars can help inform the BBC’s journalism through debate and access to expertise. The BBC refused to disclose some of the requested material it held about the seminar, including the agenda and the names of all of those who attended the seminar. This was on the basis that the BBC is only bound by the FOIA in respect of information held for purposes “other than those of journalism, art or literature” (Schedule 1, Part VI), commonly referred to as the designation, and at the time of the request the information held about the seminar was held for the BBC’s journalistic purposes. In addition, the seminar had been held under the Chatham House Rule, which enables free and frank discussion and prohibits the publication of lists of attendees. The individual requesting the material appealed, to the ICO who agreed with the BBC decision. The requester then asked for a hearing before the Information Tribunal. In October 2012, a hearing took place and the Information Tribunal unanimously upheld the BBC’s decision that it was right not to disclose the requested material. A few days after this decision in October 2012, the individual put in a new request for the same material. The requested was again refused by the BBC, upheld by the ICO and again the individual appealed. A hearing was listed at the individual’s request. Before the hearing took place, on 24 October 2013, the BBC re-reviewed its use of the information requested, and decided to provide the individual with all of the information subject to some redactions which were carried out pursuant to s.40 (personal data). The BBC explained that it was providing the material because, whilst it maintained its position that the information was held for the purpose of journalism at the time of the request, were the BBC to receive a request for the material now, it would disclose the material. The BBC explained that the redacted material included personal email addresses and personal information in the biographies of attendees. The individual withdrew his appeal and the hearing was vacated. The BBC also published the material within the frameworks of its Publication Scheme under the following links: 3 1) http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/foi/classes/disclosure_logs/rfi20121417_climate_change_se minar_2006_1.pdf; 2) http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/foi/classes/disclosure_logs/rfi20121417_climate_change_se minar_2006_2.pdf. As for your specific questions: 1. Could you please provide figures for the amount the BBC spent on lawyers to cover up attendees of the BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006? We cannot accept the characterisation of the money paid in legal fees in this case as being for the purpose of “covering up the attendees of the Climate Change panel”. As explained above the case was successfully defended to protect the BBC’s journalistic space and its use of the Chatham House Rule. You should note these fees were in relation to the first Information Tribunal case. No external fees were incurred in relation to the second request. In total, £19,485 (including VAT at 20%) was spent on external legal fees. 2. Could you also please provide figures for the amount the BBC spent on BBC Staff time/wages to cover up attendees of the BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006? Again please note we do not accept the characterisation of your question. However we can provide the following information in relation to staff costs/time. The majority of Freedom of Information work is carried out in-house within the BBC. Lawyers and other staff within the Information Policy and Compliance team, which deals with many aspects of FOI, do not charge out for their work and therefore no records of the time that is spent on each case are kept. Staff time outside of the legal division is similarly not logged as all FOI work is undertaken on top of the normal workload of any staff involved. However, I can inform you that the BBC Litigation department does log time against cases and in ‘FOI Newbury V Information Commissioner’ this was logged at 120 hours. This covered time by a number of BBC lawyers at the different stages of Mr Newbery’s Appeal including preparing submissions and attending the hearing. 3. Could you also please confirm whether the following list of attendees of the BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006 was available on the internet throughout the legal battle to cover it up? On 13 November 2012, a member of the public published a list of attendees for the seminar which took place on 26 January 2006. The individual said he found a copy of the document using an internet archive. It became apparent that the list had been posted on a website in 2007 without the permission of the BBC but had been taken down shortly afterwards. The list was therefore not available on that website during the appeal which was heard by the 4 Information Tribunal and which concluded on 8 November 2012 when the unanimous decision was handed down that the BBC was correct not to disclose the copy of the list that it held. As far as the BBC was aware, the list of attendees was not in the public domain at the time of the hearing. The fact a member of the public found the copy through the internet archive does not impact on the decision of the Tribunal nor the reason the BBC defended its decision not to disclose the material sought under the FOI Act. I hope that this information satisfies your request.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Uk News Providers Engage Young Adult Audiences (Aged 16-34) on Digital and Social Media Platforms
    ‘OLD NEWS, YOUNG VIEWS’ HOW UK NEWS PROVIDERS ENGAGE YOUNG ADULT AUDIENCES (AGED 16-34) ON DIGITAL AND SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. by LEON HAWTHORNE A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MA BY RESEARCH. Department of Film & Creative Writing School of English, Drama and Creative Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham June 2020 ii University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. iii Abstract This thesis examines the changing patterns of news consumption by young adults in the United Kingdom, aged 16 to 34 years old, and the editorial responses to this by leading television news broadcasters. It begins with a comprehensive review of the most recent literature on incidental news exposure, personalisation, echo chambers and filter bubbles; combining this with analyses of key reports by industry and governmental sources. It proposes a new taxonomy of news consumption behaviours, and a new visual taxonomy of news using the RGB (red, green, blue) colour spectrum. Senior editors at ITV News, Channel 4 News, 5 News and Sky News were interviewed to provide insights into current digital strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Brave New World Service a Unique Opportunity for the Bbc to Bring the World to the UK
    BRAVE NEW WORLD SERVIce A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BBC TO BRING THE WORLD TO THE UK JOHN MCCaRTHY WITH CHARLOTTE JENNER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Value 4 Integration: A Brave New World Service? 8 Conclusion 16 Recommendations 16 INTERVIEWEES Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications, Ishbel Matheson, Director of Media, Save the Children and University of Westminster former East Africa Correspondent, BBC World Service John Baron MP, Member of Foreign Affairs Select Committee Rod McKenzie, Editor, BBC Radio 1 Newsbeat and Charlie Beckett, Director, POLIS BBC 1Xtra News Tom Burke, Director of Global Youth Work, Y Care International Richard Ottaway MP, Chair, Foreign Affairs Select Committee Alistair Burnett, Editor, BBC World Tonight Rita Payne, Chair, Commonwealth Journalists Mary Dejevsky, Columnist and leader writer, The Independent Association and former Asia Editor, BBC World and former newsroom subeditor, BBC World Service Marcia Poole, Director of Communications, International Jim Egan, Head of Strategy and Distribution, BBC Global News Labour Organisation (ILO) and former Head of the Phil Harding, Journalist and media consultant and former World Service training department Director of English Networks and News, BBC World Service Stewart Purvis, Professor of Journalism and former Lindsey Hilsum, International Editor, Channel 4 News Chief Executive, ITN Isabel Hilton, Editor of China Dialogue, journalist and broadcaster Tony Quinn, Head of Planning, JWT Mary Hockaday, Head of BBC Newsroom Nick Roseveare, Chief Executive, BOND Peter
    [Show full text]
  • The BBC's Response to the Jimmy Savile Case
    House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee The BBC’s response to the Jimmy Savile case Oral and written evidence 23 October 2012 George Entwistle, Director-General, and David Jordan, Director of Editorial Policy and Standards, BBC 27 November 2012 Lord Patten, Chairman, BBC Trust, and Tim Davie, Acting Director-General, BBC Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 23 October and 27 November 2012 HC 649-i and -ii Published on 26 February 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £10.50 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon) (Chair) Mr Ben Bradshaw MP (Labour, Exeter) Angie Bray MP (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Conor Burns MP (Conservative, Bournemouth West) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP (Labour, Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Steve Rotheram MP (Labour, Liverpool, Walton) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, Paisley and Renfrewshire North) Mr Gerry Sutcliffe MP (Labour, Bradford South) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament. David Cairns MP (Labour, Inverclyde) Dr Thérèse Coffey MP (Conservative, Suffolk Coastal) Damian Collins MP (Conservative, Folkestone and Hythe) Alan Keen MP (Labour Co-operative, Feltham and Heston) Louise Mensch MP (Conservative, Corby) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Tom Watson MP (Labour, West Bromwich East) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Bulletin Issue 104
    Working for Quality and Diversity in Broadcasting Spring 2011 Bulletin Issue 104 VLV’s 28th Spring Conference AN EVENING WITH Tuesday 12 April 2011 GWYNETH WILLIAMS, Controller, BBC Radio 4 and Radio 4 Extra Risking Quality in Times of Change – Wednesday 18 May 2011 What future for Public Service Broadcasting? Fleming Room, The Royal College of Pathologists, 2 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AF 6.00 for 6.30 pm 10.30am - 3.45pm Geological Society, Burlington House, London W1 VLV is delighted The conference will provide an opportunity for VLV members that Gwyneth to hear and question key BBC executives and opinion formers Williams has on a range of current issues including the future of BBC News agreed to meet and journalism, the World Service and the BBC’s radio members in May to services. How will the BBC decide its priorities following the talk about her new demands recently placed on it - and at the same time networks. This is especially cope with the cuts in its funding? The conference will also opportune after the issues raised by look ahead to the Green Paper this summer prior to a new the BBC Trust’s review, published in Communications Bill in 2012. February 2011, where concerns were expressed about the future The keynote speaker will be Helen Boaden, audiences for Radio 4. The Trust Director, BBC News. Stewart Purvis, Professor said that Radio 4 should aim to of Journalism at City University, will be in the broaden its appeal amongst different chair. Helen Boaden has been Director, BBC demographic groups, such as those News since 2004 and will shortly become a outside of London and the South member of the BBC’s Executive Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview List. On-Screen and On-Air Talent. an Assessment of the BBC's
    ON SCREEN AND ON AIR TALENT AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BBC’S APPROACH AND IMPACT A REPORT FOR THE BBC TRUST APPENDIX V – BBC TRUST TALENT REVIEW INTERVIEW LIST BY OLIVER & OHLBAUM ASSOCIATES APRIL 2008 APPENDIX V - BBC TRUST TALENT REVIEW INTERVIEW LIST (those willing to be named) BBC BBC Vision Comedy, Lucy Lumsden, Controller of Comedy Commissioning BBC Vision Comedy, Mark Freedland, Head of Comedy BBC Vision Comedy, Jez Nightingale, Production Executive BBC Vision Comedy, Richard Curwen, Head of Business & Legal Affairs BBC Vision Knowledge, George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs BBC Vision Knowledge, Keith Scholey, Deputy Chief Creative Officer of BBC Vision BBC Vision Knowledge, Anne Sullivan (AS), Head of Operations & Business Affairs BBC Vision Entertainment, Jon Beazley, Controller Entertainment Group BBC Vision Entertainment, Elaine Bell, Controller Entertainment Commissioning BBC Vision Entertainment, Roger Leatham, Head of Operations & Business Affairs BBC Vision, Claire Evans, Head of Operations & Business Affairs Talent Rights Group, Simon Hayward Tapp – Head of BBC Rights Talent Rights Group, Annie Thomas, Rights Manager Talent Rights Group, John Holland, Rights Manager BBC Vision Drama, Jane Tranter, Controller BBC Fiction BBC Vision Drama, Nicolas Brown, Director of Drama Production BBC News, Helen Boaden, Director of News BBC News, Peter Horrocks, Head of TV News BBC News, Stephen Mitchell, Head of Programming and Radio News BBC News, Madhav Chinnappa, Head of Rights BBC News, Tessa Beckett, Contracts Manager BBC News,
    [Show full text]
  • Launching a New Initiative, Slow News
    Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy June 2017 In Search of Unbiased Reporting in Light of Brexit, Trump and Other Reporting Challenges in the UK and US By Helen Boaden Joan Shorenstein Fellow, Spring 2017 Former BBC News and BBC Radio Director Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Words and Meanings 5 3. The Influence of Money 7 4. The Influence of Politics 9 5. How the Pressure of the News Cycle Drives against the “Knowable Truth” of a Story 11 6. Conclusion 14 7. Acknowledgements 16 8. Endnotes 17 2 “Monogamy is actually more obtainable than news objectivity”1 Digital disruption is changing everything about the news except its professional core. Reporters use the same norms and values now as 100 years ago: objectivity, fairness and balance for the institutional media in the USA, accuracy and impartiality for the BBC. How did these principles emerge? What are their limitations? Do they still help reporters deliver “the best obtainable version of the truth” in a world of growing disinformation? 2 Introduction The BBC’s commitment to impartiality caused an uproar in 2009 when Nick Griffin, widely reviled as leader of the far right British National Party, was invited to appear on its flagship political debate show, Question Time. Politicians and faith leaders weighed in against the BBC, newspapers accused it of a publicity stunt, and the Secretary of State for Wales tried unsuccessfully to get the show pulled. The BBC stood firm. Its director general and editor in chief, Mark Thompson, said the BBC wasn’t in the business of censoring unpalatable views.
    [Show full text]
  • New News, Future News the Challenges for Television News After Digital Switch-Over
    New News, Future News The challenges for television news after Digital Switch-over An Ofcom discussion document Publication date: 26 June 2007 Foreword The prospects for television news in a fully digital era are a central element in any consideration of the future of public service broadcasting (PSB). News is regarded by viewers as the most important of all the PSB genres, and television remains by far the most used source of news for UK citizens. The role of news and information as part of the democratic process is long established, and its status is specifically underpinned in the Communications Act 2003. This report, New News, Future News, is one of a series of Ofcom studies focussing on individual topics identified in the PSB Review of 2004/05, and further discussed in the Digital PSB report of July 2006. The others are on the provision of children’s programmes and on the prospects for a Public Service Publisher. All three studies are linked to areas of particular PSB concern for the future, and set out a framework for policy consideration ahead of the next full PSB review. Other Ofcom work of relevance includes the review of Channel 4’s funding. It has not been the role of this report to come up with solutions, and no policy recommendations are put forward. Instead, the report examines the environment in which television news currently operates, and assesses how that may change in future (after digital switch-over and, in 2014, the expiry of current Channel 3 and Channel 5 licences) . It identifies particular issues that will need to be addressed and suggests some specific questions that may need to be answered.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17
    Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by command of Her Majesty © BBC Copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as BBC copyright and the document title specified. Photographs are used ©BBC or used under the terms of the PACT agreement except where otherwise identified. Permission from copyright holders must be sought before any photographs are reproduced. You can download this publication from bbc.co.uk/annualreport BBC Pay Disclosures July 2017 Report from the BBC Remuneration Committee of people paid more than £150,000 of licence fee revenue in the financial year 2016/17 1 Senior Executives Since 2009, we have disclosed salaries, expenses, gifts and hospitality for all senior managers in the BBC, who have a full time equivalent salary of £150,000 or more or who sit on a major divisional board. Under the terms of our new Charter, we are now required to publish an annual report for each financial year from the Remuneration Committee with the names of all senior executives of the BBC paid more than £150,000 from licence fee revenue in a financial year. These are set out in this document in bands of £50,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Processes – How Bbc News Works
    EDITORIAL PROCESSES – HOW BBC NEWS WORKS This document sets out the way that editorial decisions are taken in BBC News. At one level, the process is straightforward; the final decision about what to broadcast is taken by the editor of each area of output – whether it be a programme, a strand on a continuous news network or an online section. As the Neil Review of BBC Journalism reaffirmed in 2004, the editors are the “gatekeepers”. But BBC editors take the decisions they do in the context of the core BBC values that should drive all our journalism – truth and accuracy; serving the public interest; impartiality and diversity of opinion; independence; and accountability. They operate within an overarching framework of direction, guidance, policy and strategy which is set by senior management and approved and monitored by the BBC Trust (and formerly the Governors). Decision-making is a process of delegated editorial responsibility, with considerable checks and balances. Helen Boaden Director, BBC News (22nd January, 2007) The scale of BBC News The sheer scale of BBC News has a decisive impact on the way we are organized. It is like a big newspaper conglomerate with numerous titles – but publishing in different formats (radio, television and online) and catering for a range of different audiences. As of September 2006, BBC News employed just under 3,500 journalists producing 619 hours of news and weather per week on domestic radio and television, and 400 new stories a day on the website, with thousands of updates. BBC News also produces programming for BBC World and BBC World Service Radio which is commissioned by the Global Division.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Just the Women'*
    ‘Just the Women’* An evaluation of eleven British national newspapers’ portrayal of women over a two week period in September 2012, including recommendations on press regulation reform in order to reduce harm to, and discrimination against, women A joint report by: Eaves End Violence Against Women Coalition Equality Now OBJECT November 2012 * ‘just the women’ is what Newsnight editor Peter Rippon reportedly wrote in an email to a colleague concerning the lack of other authorities for evidence of Jimmy Savile’s abuse 1 Contents: Introduction and Executive Summary 3 ‘Now that’s an invasion of her privates’: Rape culture and the reporting of violence against women and girls 9 ‘Brit tot parade!’: The reporting of abuse of girls, and the sexualisation of girls in newspapers 15 ‘Irina is a booty’: The objectification and sexualisation of women and the mainstreaming of the sex industries in newspapers 20 ‘Babes, retro babes, celeb babes, sports babes, hot celeb babe pics’: Disappearing, stereotyping and humiliating women 26 Conclusions and Recommendations 31 2 INTRODUCTION The Leveson Inquiry was announced in July 2011 after months of allegations and revelations about press conduct. Although perhaps focused on phone hacking and relationships between the media, the police and politicians, the Inquiry’s actual terms of reference are broad1. They include: “To inquire into the culture, practices, and ethics of the press…: “To make recommendations: “For a new more effective policy and regulatory regime which supports the integrity and freedom of
    [Show full text]
  • Worth 1000 Words Illustrated Reportage Makes a Comeback Contents
    MAGAZINE OF THE NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS WWW.NUJ.ORG.UK | OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2019 Worth 1000 words Illustrated reportage makes a comeback Contents Main feature 16 Drawing the news The re-emergence of illustrated news News t’s an incredible time to be a journalist if 03 Recognition win at Vice UK you’re involved in Brexit coverage in any way. The extraordinary has become the Agreement after 3-year campaign norm and every day massive stories and 04 Barriers to women photographers twists and turns are guaranteed. Conference shares best practice IIn this edition of The Journalist, Raymond Snoddy celebrates this boom time for journalists 05 UN told of BBC persian plight and journalism in his column. And in an extract from his latest Threats to journalists’ families book, Denis MacShane looks at the role of the press in Brexit. 06 TUC news Extraordinary times also provide the perfect conditions for What the NUJ had to say and more cartoons and satirical illustration. In our cover feature Rachel Broady looks at the re-emergence of illustrated reportage, a “form of journalism that came to prominence in Victorian Features times – and arguably before that with the social commentary of 10 Payment changed my life Hogarth. The work of charity NUJ Extra A picture can indeed be worth 1,000 words. But some writers can also paint wonderfully evocative pictures with their deft 12 Fleet Street pioneers use of words. And on that note, it’s a pleasure to have Paul Women in the top jobs Routledge back in the magazine with a piece on his battle to 14 Database miners free his email address from a voracious PR database.
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Bush's Massive Usa Pedophile Network
    NEIL BUSH'S MASSIVE USA PEDOPHILE NETWORK Neil Mallon Bush 4 South West Oak Drive Unit 1 Houston, TX 77056-2063 Phone numbers: 713-552-0882 713-850-1288 The brother of George W. Bush, Neil is another evil Satanist running the biggest pedophile network in the USA currently. He MUST be stopped, he MUST be punished, since he (and lots of other high-level Satanists) operates his crime empire with impunity and always has had immunity from prosecution by the FBI and the rest of the FEDS. Many, many other little kids will suffer INTOLERABLE, EXCRUCIATING sexual agony and torture that their little bodies are not ready for, and will be scared and traumatized for the rest of their lives because of sick perverted fun these monsters enjoy by inflicting on these innocent little children, some of which are even used in secret Satanic sacrifices, and are brutally murdered, all for the sickening pleasure of these evil perverts. All of the Senate, and just about all of the Congress, and Federal Attorneys, and high-ranking military officers are involved in this Illuminati death cult. If you just sit there doing nothing, nothing will be stopped. Check out what happens at your local Masonic Temple or Scottish Rite Temple between tomorrow (Halloween) and November 1st. Every sheriff department and every police department has an imbedded agent who's job it is to get arrested and charged Satanists, and Freemasons off the hook, having their charges dropped quickly once they find out these criminals are a Satanist or a Mason. People Neil may know Ned Bush Pierce G Bush Elizabeth D Andrews Ashley Bush REPUBLICAN PARTY PEDOPHILES LIST * Republican mayor Thomas Adams of Illinois charged with 11 counts of disseminating child pornography and two counts of possession of child pornography.
    [Show full text]