PORT of HOUSTON AUTHORITY Self-Evaluation Report Submitted to Texas Sunset Advisory Commission September 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PORT of HOUSTON AUTHORITY Self-Evaluation Report Submitted to Texas Sunset Advisory Commission September 2011 PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Self-Evaluation Report Submitted to Texas Sunset Advisory Commission September 2011 INTRODUCTION The Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas (herein referred to as the “Port Authority”, the “Authority”, the “Navigation District” or the “District”) is pleased to submit its Self-Evaluation Report to the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission. For one hundred years the Port Authority has served an integral part in the development of the Port of Houston. The Port of Houston spans the upper half of the 52-mile long Houston Ship Channel (the “Channel”) to the Gulf of Mexico. It includes more than 150 public and privately-owned cargo terminals and other industrial facilities along the waterway. The Port of Houston is the nation’s No.1 port in terms of foreign waterborne tonnage and is home to the world’s second largest petrochemical complex. The Port Authority owns and operates nine public terminals in addition to providing security and emergency response services and working with the federal government as the local sponsor of the Houston Ship Channel. The Port Authority was born from the entrepreneurial vision and spirit of early Texas pioneers, who achieved a close partnership of public and private interests to help develop the state’s maritime commerce. This partnership continues today with a strong collaboration among industry and local, state and federal governments. The Port Authority was constituted in January 1911, when Harris County voters authorized the establishment of a navigation district and $1,250,000 in bonds to provide funds to help dredge and maintain a deep-water ship channel to the Gulf of Mexico. The U.S. Congress appropriated the other half of the necessary funds, and work was completed under the jurisdiction of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The newly dredged 25-foot deep water channel opened on November 10, 1914. The City of Houston (the “City”) soon thereafter built and operated wharves and docks along the channel. In 1922, the Port Authority assumed responsibility for operations and maintenance of the City’s port facilities along with its responsibility for work on the channel proper. That same year the City’s Harbor Board and the governing body of the Navigation District were merged into a single five-member Board of Navigation and Canal Commissioners, which was subsequently expanded to seven members and renamed the Port Commission. In a series of statutes the Texas Legislature spelled out the Port Authority’s mission, culminating in 1927 with Section 1, Chapter 97, Acts of the 40th Legislature, Regular Session: “the development of deep water navigation and the improvement of rivers, bays, creeks, streams, and canals” within its boundaries. The 1927 Act also gave it the “purpose and authority to acquire, purchase, undertake, construct, maintain, operate, develop, and regulate wharves, docks, warehouses, grain elevators, bunkering facilities, belt railroads … and all other facilities or aids incident to or necessary to the operation of ports or waterways within said District and extending to the Gulf of Mexico.” On January 1, 1958, the Port Authority converted to a navigation district operating under Article XVI, Section 59 of the Texas Constitution, pursuant to Chapter 117, Acts of the 55th Legislature, Regular Session, 1957, in addition to its powers under Article III, Section 52. The 1957 Act further defined the role and governance of the Port Authority, and expanded its responsibilities for operation and development of ports and waterways to include activities “in aid of navigation and commerce thereon.” This underscored its mandate to create jobs and foster economic activity in the region. In this report we focus your attention on three basic components of the Port Authority’s operations: 1. The public component, which seeks to be a good steward of the public welfare, to be accountable to its local and state governmental stakeholders, and to give back to the local communities through sponsorships, education and job creation activities. 2. The terminal operations of the Port Authority, which promote and facilitate commerce by providing efficient and cost-effective marine terminals, for the competitive benefit of the Port of Houston, Texas and the nation. 3. The operation of the Houston Ship Channel, a federal waterway that must be maintained and protected so that future generations can continue to benefit from this vital national resource. The Port Authority plays an integral role in the mission of the overall Port of Houston as the local sponsor of the Houston Ship Channel, which is a major economic engine for the region and the state. The last economic impact study completed in 2006 shows that the Port of Houston is a catalyst for more than 785,000 statewide jobs and nearly $118 billion of annual statewide economic activity, and contributes $3.7 billion annually in local and state taxes. Cargo handling at Port Authority facilities accounted for approximately 15% of the total tonnage moving through the Port of Houston, and for over 50% of the port’s total jobs. The Port of Houston is also a vital link to the rest of the world, engaging in trade and commerce with more than 90% of the world’s countries, including the four “BRIC” nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China), which boast the world’s fastest-growing economies. Despite the recent financial crisis, a total of 31.3 million tons of cargo moved through Port Authority facilities in 2010, an increase of 8.5% over the prior year. The Port Authority is preparing to undertake significant infrastructure improvements to ensure that the Port of Houston can accommodate the advent of larger vessels and increased cargo resulting from the pending Panama Canal expansion in 2014 and expected future growth in the region. We appreciate the opportunity to present an overview of the Port Authority, including issues, challenges, and suggested improvements to help ensure that the Port Authority continues to meet its mission and key functions for the next century. Please note that since the Port Authority is not a state-funded agency, a number of the original questions in this report have been modified to reflect the operations and nature of the Port Authority. We look forward to working with your staff during the review process. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us or any of our liaisons listed in Section I on page 1 of this report. Sincerely, James T. Edmonds Chairman, Port Commission Alec G. Dreyer Chief Executive Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Agency Contact Information ............................................................................................................ 1 II. Key Functions and Performance ..................................................................................................... 3 III. History and Major Events .............................................................................................................. 19 IV. Policymaking Structure .................................................................................................................. 25 V. Funding ............................................................................................................................................ 31 VI. Organization .................................................................................................................................... 47 VII. Guide to Agency Programs ............................................................................................................ 51 1. Operations - Container Terminals .................................................................................................. 51 2. Turning Basin Terminals ............................................................................................................... 59 3. Port Security & Emergency Operations ......................................................................................... 67 4. Strategic Planning .......................................................................................................................... 81 5. Engineering & Real Estate ............................................................................................................. 99 6. Finance & Administration ............................................................................................................ 111 7. Legal ............................................................................................................................................ 123 8. Origination ................................................................................................................................... 131 9. Public Affairs & Economic Analysis ........................................................................................... 141 10. Human Resources ........................................................................................................................ 151 11. Executive ..................................................................................................................................... 157 12. Small Business ............................................................................................................................. 163 VIII. Statutory Authority and Recent Legislation ............................................................................... 171 IX. Policy Issues ..................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • State Highway 146 & Red Bluff Rd. Seabrook, Tx
    STATE HIGHWAY 146 & RED BLUFF RD. +/- 122.8 SEABROOK, TX ACRES Galveston Bay Boggy Bayou Port Rd. Old Hwy. 146 +/- 122.8 acres Red Bluff Rd. Liberty Lake Detention Pond Red Bluff Rd. +/- 12.8 acres Red Bluff Rd. Bayport Blvd. N FOR SALE | LAND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY avisonyoung.com | avisonyoungcapitalmarkets.com FOR SALE LAND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY +/- 122.8 ACRES STATE HIGHWAY 146 & RED BLUFF RD., SEABROOK, TX RARE OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE A PREMIER SITE ADJACENT TO THE BAYPORT CONTAINER TERMINAL EXCELLENT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL - Opportunity for industrial transformation with empowerment zone designation. Major employers within a 5-mile radius include Johnson Space Center (14,000), Bayport Industrial District (4,500) and Port of Houston Bayport Terminal (3,000). SUPERIOR LOCATION - Less than eight miles to Highway 225 (Pasadena Freeway), less than nine miles to the major junction of Beltway 8 and Highway 225, four miles to Bay Area Business Park, three miles to Kemah Boardwalk and five miles to Johnson Space Center. STRATEGIC TRANSPORT ACCESS - Construction of a rail spur to connect to the Bayport Terminal is currently underway on the north side of the property. It will cross State Highway 146 and connect the existing rail from Strang rail line to within 900 feet of the Container Freight Station (CFS) road in the Bayport Intermodal Facility, allowing the movement of containers between ships, trucks and rail. The Bayport Container Terminal is considered the most modern and environmentally sensitive container terminal on the Gulf Coast and when fully developed will generate more than 32,000 jobs and add approximately $1.6 billion to the Texas economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Closed Circuit Television for Traffic Surveillance in Texas
    APPLICATION OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION FOR TRAFFIC SURVEILLANCE IN TEXAS by William R. McCasland Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute and Raymond G. Biggs Engineering Technician Texas Highway Department Research Report Number 139-11 Freeway Control and Information Systems Research Study Number 2-8-69-139 Sponsored by The Texas Highway Department In Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE Texas A&M University College Station, Texas August 1971 ABSTRACT Closed circuit television (CCTV) has been used for surveillance of traffic and transportation facilities for many years. However, the num­ ber of operating systems are few bec,ause their effectiveness as a long term surveillance system has been suspect due to the inclusion of human observers in the surveillance loop. The use of CCTV for short intensive observations necessary to research and traffic studies has been success­ ful. The accelerating development of area wide traffic surveillance, control, and communications systems for urban areas will increase the interest in the use of CCTV as part of the surveillance system. There are four operating CCTV systems in Texas that are used for traffic sur­ veillance. Each system has different design and operating characteris­ tics. DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed ,or implied in this report are those of the research agency and not necessarily those of the Texas Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administration. SUMMARY There are four closed circuit television systems in Texas that are designed and operated for traffic surveillance. Each system has different design and operating characteristics to satisfy the surveillance require­ ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Task 3 Work Plan & Sampling Process Design and Monitoring Schedule (Plan)
    Appendix B: Task 3 Work Plan & Sampling Process Design and Monitoring Schedule (Plan) Appendix B - Sampling Process Design and Monitoring Schedule (plan) TASK 3: WATER QUALITY MONITORING Objectives: Water quality monitoring will focus on the characterization of a variety of locations and conditions. This will include a combination of the following: • planning and coordinating Multi-Basin monitoring; • routine, regularly-scheduled monitoring to collect long-term information and support statewide assessment of water quality; • systematic, regularly-scheduled short-term monitoring to screen water bodies for issues. • permit support monitoring to provide information for setting permit effluent limits; and • special study, intensive monitoring targeted to: o identify sources and causes of pollution; o assess priority water quality issues; o obtain background water quality information; o provide information for setting site-specific permit effluent limits; and o evaluate statewide, regional, and site-specific water quality standards. Task Description: The Performing Party will coordinate and develop water quality monitoring strategies through the Regional Monitoring Workgroup (RMW). The RMW will meet during three of four quarters to discuss monitoring needs, problems, successes and changes. The fourth quarter meeting is conducted as the Coordinated Monitoring Meeting (see below). The RMW is composed of H-GAC CRP staff and representatives from local participating agencies, currently including Harris County Pollution Control, Environmental Institute of Houston, City of Houston-Health Department, City of Houston-Drinking Water Operations, Texas Research Institute for Environmental Studies, and the San Jacinto River Authority as well as H-GAC’s contract lab and TCEQ Region 12. Meeting notices will be sent to TCEQ Austin, United States Geological Survey (USGS), Texas Parks and Wildlife, Texas Department of Health, GBEP, local universities, and other interested parties to invite input on monitoring discussions and strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Ten - Ratcliff Reserve I-10 East at Thompson Rd Tomball Baytown, TX 77521 for Lease Kingwood +15,000 S.F
    Lake Conroe Willis Cleveland 105 105 Conroe Not actual building The Woodlands Thompson Ten - Ratcliff Reserve I-10 East at Thompson Rd Tomball Baytown, TX 77521 For Lease Kingwood +15,000 s.f. crane ready building on ±1.0 acres Richard Quarles, CCIM +1 713 888 4019 Site features: Bush [email protected] Intercontinental – ±15,000 s.f. crane-ready building on ±1.0 Airport acres Joe Berwick +1 713 425 5842 – Office: 10% finish [email protected] – Crane capacity: 10 ton – Eave height: 28’ Site – Power: 400 amps, 480V, 3-phase Katy – Overhead doors: (2) 14’ x 16’ Thompson Rd Baytown – Utilities in place Houston – Regional detention provided Barbours Cut Terminal – Truck court: ±100’ – Under construction - delivery Q4 2018 La Porte Pasadena – Up to ±6.75 acres available for expansion or Hobby Airport build-to-suit 146 Sugar Land Ellington Galveston Owned and developed by: Field Bay Missouri City Bayport Container Terminal Pearland League City +15,000 s.f. crane ready building on ±1.0 acres For Lease Baytown, TX 77521 Location Located just south of I-10 at the Thompson Road exit, The Ratcliff Reserve at Thompson 10 is conveniently located near major refineries and petrochemical plants locations as well as Port of Houston terminals. Via Major Highways East Freeway Frontage Road Gilbert Landing LOCATION APPROX. DRIVE TIME San Jacinto Mall Site Exxon 6 minutes WADE RD WADE Barbours Cut Terminal 10 minutes Chevron 14 minutes Grand Parkway 14 minutes THOMPSON RD Bayport Terminal 15 minutes Jacintoport Terminal 15 minutes UPRR COADY RAIL YARD Greensport Terminal 18 minutes Shell 18 minutes Lynchburg Lyondell 19 minutes Total 19 minutes 225330 Bush Intercontinental Airport 32 minutes Hobby Airport 27 minutes CHEVRON TO BUSH Site INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT 1000 yd Oct 12 2017 © Stepmap, 123map • Data: OpenStreetMap, License ODbL 1.0 BAYTOWN 225330 JACINTOPORT EXXON HOUSTON TERMINAL GREENSPORT TERMINAL 1468 SHELL 225 225146 BARBOURS CUT TERMINAL HOBBY AIRPORT LYONDELL +15,000 s.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrisburg Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone May 2016 Inside Cover Table of Contents
    Existing Conditions Harrisburg Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone May 2016 Inside Cover Table of Contents Introduction Housing LOCATION .......................................................... 5 HOUSING STOCK ................................................ 29 EXISTING PL ANS AND STUDIES ............................... 12 HOUSING TYpeS ................................................. 30 Land Use & Mobility AGE ................................................................ 30 EleMENTS OF THE DISTRICT ................................... 13 Crime LAND USE/PROpeRTY CL ASSIFICATION ..................... 13 Economic Indicators ROADWAYS ........................................................ 16 BUSINESS SUMMARY ............................................ 35 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................... 16 RETAIL TRADE .................................................... 38 RAILROAD ......................................................... 17 DAY TIME POPUL ATION .......................................... 40 BIKEWAYS ......................................................... 17 Planned Infrastructure Improvements RAILS TO TRAILS ................................................. 17 CAPITAL IMPROveMENTS ....................................... 45 PARKS & TRAILS ................................................. 21 RebUILD HOUSTON +5 ........................................ 45 REIMAGINE METRO ............................................. 21 Observations People OBSERVATIONS ................................................... 49
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Municipal Report PHA Debt 2019-0521
    Port of Houston Auth Texas Municipal Reports © (General Obligation Debt) Last Revised: 5/21/2019 TMR # 5697 Harris County Page 1 of 12 FINANCIAL STATEMENT Lead Manager: Bank of America Merrill Lynch Co-Manager: Jefferies & Company FINANCIAL STATEMENT (As of December 31, 2018) Co-Manager: RBC Capital Markets Co-Manager: Samuel A. Ramirez & Co., Inc. Net Taxable Assessed Valuation ("A.V."), 2018 $437,676,928,000 Co-Manager: Siebert Brandford Shank & Co. GO Debt payable from Ad Valorem Taxes $593,754,397 Use of Proceeds: Refunding. Less: I&S Fund 44,646,000 ------------------ Refunding Notes: This issue defeased mty(s) 10/1/2010-10/1/2015, 10/01/2017, Net Debt $549,108,397 10/1/2019 of U/L Tax Port Imp Bds Ser 98A @ par. ================== Orig Reoffering Net Debt Per Net Taxable Assessed Valuation - 0.13% Maturity Amount Coupon Price/Yield Net Debt Per Sq mile - $308,834.87 Net Debt Per Capita - $118.01 10/01/2019 3,660,000.00 5.0000% 4.150% -------------------------------------------------$3,660,000.00 Net Taxable Assessed Valuation Per Capita - $94,063.79 Call Option: Non Callable Bureau of Census Pop: 2000 - 3,400,578 Bureau of Census Pop: 2010 - 4,092,459 2017 Estimated Population - 4,652,980 U/L Tax Ref Bds Ser 2010B (NON-AMT) Area: 1,778.00 Sq mile Tax Treatment: Tax Exempt Original Issue Amount $22,930,000.00 PAYMENT RECORD Dated Date: 12/01/2009 Sale Date: 01/14/2010 Delivery Date: 02/17/2010 Never defaulted. Sale Type: Negotiated Record Date: MSRB TAX DATA Bond Form: BE Denomination $5,000 Interest pays Semi-Annually: 10/01, 04/01 Tax Tax Adjusted % Collections Year 1st Coupon Date: 04/01/2010 Year A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Baytown Mobility Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    BAYTOWN MOBILITY PLAN u Adopted January 24, 2013 City of Baytown Baytown Mobility Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council – Mayor, Stephen H. DonCarlos 2011 Members District 1 – Mercedes Renteria III Barry Bobbitt District 2 – Scott Sheley Brandon Benoit District 3 – Brandon Capetillo Gil Chambers District 4 – Terry Sain Dr. Joe C. Floyd District 5 – Robert C. Hoskins Jim Hutchison District 6 – David McCartney Mary Flores Planning & Zoning Commission Rolando Valdez Tracey Wheeler 2012 Members Spencer Carnes Brandon Benoit City Staff R.D. Burnside Administration Spencer Carnes Bob Leiper, City Manager Gilbert Chambers Ron Bottoms, Deputy City Manager James E. “Bo” Cox Kevin Troller, Assistant City Manager Lisa D. Clary Dr. Joe C. Floyd Planning & Development Services Kelly Carpenter, AICP, Director of Planning and Development Shawn McDonald Services Tracey Wheeler Tiffany Foster, AICP, Assistant Director Andrew Allemand, AICP, Development Review Manager Page – i City of Baytown Baytown Mobility Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................ i 6.5 Conclusions ............................................................................... 6-10 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................... iv CHAPTER 7. MULTI-MODAL ASSESSMENT ............................................. 7-1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1-1 7.1 Introduction ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Underwood Business Park Port of Houston 206 Acre Master Planned Industrial Park Hwy 225 & Old Underwood Road La Porte, Texas 77571
    FOR LEASE & BUILD TO SUIT UNDERWOOD BUSINESS PARK PORT OF HOUSTON 206 ACRE MASTER PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK HWY 225 & OLD UNDERWOOD ROAD LA PORTE, TEXAS 77571 Galveston Bay N Barbours Cut Bayport Terminal Terminal La Porte 146 La Porte Municipal Airport Air Products & Chemicals Inc. 225 Strang Road Railroad Old Underwood Road Site FOR MORE Billy Gold Jeff Everist Gray Gilbert INFORMATION Senior Vice President First Vice President Senior Vice President PLEASE 713.577.1709 713.577.1719 713.577.1777 CONTACT [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] FOR LEASE & BUILD TO SUIT UNDERWOOD BUSINESS PARK Underwood Business Park includes over 2 million square feet of state-of-the-art dock high industrial facilities developed between 2005-2008 to accommodate distribution to light manufacturing users servicing the Greater Houston Area and the Port communites. PARK AMENITIES • Rail service provided by Union Pacific Railroad • Outside storage/trailer parking areas possible • Foreign trade zone designation • Additional land for build-to-suit projects • In close proximity to the Barbours Cut and Baytown container terminals LOCATION • Located in La Porte, Texas approximately 8 miles west of Baytown and 20 miles east of downtown Houston • Take exit TX-134 (Battleground Road/ Independence Parkway) off State Highway 225 within minutes of TX 146, Barbours Cut and Bayport terminals • La Porte Zoning designation - Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) N © 2014 CBRE, Inc. The information contained in this document has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While CBRE, Inc. does not doubt its accuracy, CBRE, Inc. has not verified it and makes no guarantee, warranty or representation about it.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS of LACK of MAINTENANCE DREDGING of the HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010
    DIRECT ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF LACK OF MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL December 2010 Prepared by CENTER FOR PORTS AND WATERWAYS TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE 701 NORTH POST OAK, SUITE 430 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77024‐3827 for PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................. 1 Phase 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Phase 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 6 CATEGORY 1: LIGHT LOADING ........................................................................................... 10 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 10 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 13 CATEGORY 2: PARTIAL DISCHARGE AT WOODHOUSE TERMINAL ........................... 17 Selection and Data Acquisition ................................................................................................. 17 Valuation ................................................................................................................................... 17 CATEGORY
    [Show full text]
  • Official Statement Series 2015A 2015B 2015C
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 21, 2015 NEW ISSUES - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Fitch “AAA” S&P “AAA” In the opinion of Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing law, (a) interest on the Series 2015A Bonds (as defined below) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and the Series 2015A Bonds are not “private activity bonds” and (b) (i) interest on the Series 2015B Bonds (as defined below) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, except with respect to interest on any Series 2015B Bond for any period during which such Series 2015B Bond is held by a person who, within the meaning of Section 147(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, is a “substantial user” or a “related person” to such a “substantial user” of the facilities financed or refinanced with the proceeds of the Series 2015B Bonds, as described under “TAX MATTERS—Tax Exemption – Series 2015 Bonds” herein, and (ii) interest on the Series 2015B Bonds is an item of tax preference that is includable in alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of determining the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. See “TAX MATTERS—Tax Exemption – Series 2015A Bonds” for a discussion of the opinion of Bond Counsel, including a description of alternative minimum tax consequences for corporations, for the Series 2015A Bonds and “TAX MATTERS—Tax Exemption – Series 2015B Bonds” for a discussion of the opinion of Bond Counsel for the Series 2015B Bonds. Interest on the Series 2015C Bonds (as defined below) is not excludable from gross income for federal tax purposes under existing law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twin Cable-Stayed Composite Bridge at Baytown, Texas
    The twin cable-stayed composite bridge at Baytown, Texas Autor(en): Svensson, Holger S. / Lovett, Thomas G. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: IABSE reports = Rapports AIPC = IVBH Berichte Band (Jahr): 60 (1990) PDF erstellt am: 07.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-46499 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch 317 The Twin Cable-Stayed Composite Bridge at Baytown, Texas Pont jumelé mixte à haubans de Baytown au Texas Schrägkabelbrücke mit Verbundträgern in Baytown, Texas H. S. SVENSSON Thomas G. LOVETT Manager Assoc. Vice Pres. Leonhardt, Andrä & Partner Greiner, Inc. Stuttgart, FR Germany Tampa, FL, USA Floiger S.
    [Show full text]
  • July 12, 2021 – More Double-Digit Growth for Port
    For Immediate Release July 12, 2021 More double-digit growth for Port Houston Best June on record for containers Photo caption: Container activity at Bayport Container Terminal HOUSTON – Port Houston sees another record month with containers leading the way. This June was the highest June on record for containers at Port Houston, with a total of 292,627 TEUs. June was also the best month ever at Port Houston for loaded imports, with 139,488 TEUs. Total June container numbers showed a 39% increase over last year, with 292,627 TEUs in 2021 compared to last year’s 210,932 TEU count for the same month. Year-to-date Port Houston has recorded 1,607,793 TEUs, a 13% increase over last year. Total tonnage is up 7% this month and 2% year-to-date. Steel and auto volumes dipped this month, however, year to date is still positive, at a 3% increase in steel and 44% increase in autos compared to 2020. Page 1 of 2 Consumer spending is up and that trend is likely to continue. “Houston is a growth market and at Port Houston we’re poised and ready for continued growth. As an operating port, we are here to meet the changing needs of vessels and businesses and continue adding new services and additional capacity to move the world and drive regional prosperity,” said Roger Guenther, Executive Director at Port Houston. With growth on the horizon, Port Houston is focused on building infrastructure. This month, Port Houston received the renewal of the Bayport Terminal permit by the U.S.
    [Show full text]