DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2019 National School Climate Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 2019 National School Climate Survey The 2019 National School Climate Survey The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth in Our Nation’s Schools A Report from GLSEN www.glsen.org The 2019 National School Climate Survey The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth in Our Nation’s Schools by Joseph G. Kosciw, Ph.D. Caitlin M. Clark, Ph.D. Nhan L. Truong, Ph.D. Adrian D. Zongrone, M.P.H. National Headquarters 110 William Street, 30th Floor New York, NY 10038 Ph: 212-727-0135 Fax: 212-727-0254 DC Policy Office Make Office K Street 6th Floor, Attn: GLSEN 1015 15th Street, NW Washington, DC, 20005 Ph: 202-347-7780 Fax: 202-347-7781 [email protected] www.glsen.org © 2020 GLSEN ISBN 978-1-934092-33-0 When referencing this document, we recommend the following citation: Kosciw, J. G., Clark, C. M., Truong, N. L., & Zongrone, A. D. (2020). The 2019 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN. GLSEN is the leading national education organization focused on ensuring safe schools for all students. Established in 1990, GLSEN envisions a world in which every child learns to respect and accept all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity/expression. GLSEN seeks to develop school climates where difference is valued for the positive contribution it makes to creating a more vibrant and diverse community. For more information on our educator resources, research, public policy agenda, student leadership programs, or development initiatives, visit www.glsen.org. Graphic design: Adam Fredericks Quotes throughout are from students’ responses to open-ended questions in the survey. Electronic versions of this report and all other GLSEN research reports are available at www.glsen.org/research. CONTENTS PREFACE .........................................................................................................................................xi Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... xiv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... xv INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS AND SAMPLE .................................................................................................................. 7 Insight on Emerging Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Terms Over Time ............................... 10 PART ONE: EXTENT AND EFFECTS OF HOSTILE SCHOOL CLIMATE .................................................. 13 School Safety ................................................................................................................................. 15 Overall Safety at School ............................................................................................................ 16 School Engagement and Safety Concerns .................................................................................... 16 Insight on Feelings of Safety Regarding Citizenship Over Time ...................................................... 17 Exposure to Biased Language ........................................................................................................... 21 Hearing Anti-LGBTQ Remarks at School ...................................................................................... 22 Anti-LGBTQ Remarks from School Personnel ............................................................................... 25 Hearing Other Types of Biased Remarks at School ........................................................................ 26 Experiences of Harassment and Assault at School .............................................................................. 27 Harassment and Assault Based on Sexual Orientation, Gender, and Gender Expression .................... 28 Harassment and Assault Based on Other Characteristics ............................................................... 29 Other Types of Harassment and Negative Events .......................................................................... 29 Reporting of School-Based Harassment and Assault ........................................................................... 31 Reasons for Not Reporting Harassment or Assault ........................................................................ 32 Students’ Reports on the Nature of School Staff’s Responses to Harassment and Assault ................ 34 Effectiveness of Staff Responses to Harassment and Assault ......................................................... 36 Experiences of Discrimination at School............................................................................................ 39 Restricting LGBTQ Expression in School ..................................................................................... 40 Limiting LGBTQ Inclusion in Extracurricular Activities .................................................................. 40 Enforcing Adherence to Traditional Gender Norms ........................................................................ 42 Gender Separation in School ...................................................................................................... 42 Hostile School Climate, Educational Outcomes, and Psychological Well-Being ...................................... 45 Educational Aspirations ............................................................................................................. 46 School Climate and Educational Aspirations ................................................................................ 47 School Climate and Academic Achievement ................................................................................ 48 Absenteeism ............................................................................................................................ 48 School Climate and School Discipline ........................................................................................ 49 School Climate and School Belonging ......................................................................................... 51 School Climate and Psychological Well-Being .............................................................................. 52 PART TWO: SCHOOL-BASED RESOURCES AND SUPPORTS .............................................................. 55 Availability of School-Based Resources and Supports ......................................................................... 57 Supportive Student Clubs .......................................................................................................... 58 Inclusive Curricular Resources ................................................................................................... 58 Insight on GSA Activities ........................................................................................................... 59 Supportive School Personnel ...................................................................................................... 61 Insight on Reasons for Not Attending a GSA ................................................................................ 63 Inclusive and Supportive School Policies..................................................................................... 64 Utility of School-Based Resources and Supports ................................................................................ 69 Supportive Student Clubs .......................................................................................................... 70 Inclusive Curricular Resources ................................................................................................... 73 Supportive School Personnel ...................................................................................................... 75 Inclusive and Supportive School Policies..................................................................................... 79 v PART THREE: SCHOOL CLIMATE BY DEMOGRAPHIC AND SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS ..................... 85 School Climate and Sexual Orientation ............................................................................................. 87 Victimization ........................................................................................................................... 89 Discrimination and School Discipline ......................................................................................... 90 Absenteeism ............................................................................................................................ 90 School Climate and Gender ............................................................................................................. 93 Experiences of Transgender Students ......................................................................................... 94 Insight on Gender-Related Discrimination Among Transgender Students Over Time........................ 102 Experiences of Nonbinary Students ......................................................................................... 103 Experiences of Cisgender LGBQ Students ................................................................................. 104 Experiences of Questioning Students ....................................................................................... 105 School Climate and Racial/Ethnic Identity ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIVERSE EQUITABLE INCLUSIVE K-12 Public Schools a New Call for Philanthropic Support
    DIVERSE EQUITABLE INCLUSIVE K-12 Public Schools A New Call for Philanthropic Support the Sillerman Center FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PHILANTHROPY Acknowledgements This report was written by Dr. Susan Eaton and Dr. Suchi Saxena. This report grows out of a long-running project of the Sillerman Center that engages grantmakers who want to better understand the causes, myriad harms and potential cures for racial and socioeconomic segregation in our nation's K-12 public schools. This report was informed by interviews with a wide variety of educators and other practitioners working towards diverse, equitable and inclusive schools, by numerous convenings and conferences, by research and by the authors' experience in this field. We wish to thank our project collabora- tors and sponsors, The Ford Foundation and the Einhorn Family Charitable Trust. We deeply appreciate all the people who reviewed this report for us, who participated in interviews and who attended meetings that we hosted in 2017. Special thanks to Sheryl Seller, Stacey King, Amber Abernathy and Victoria St. Jean at the Sillerman Center, to Mary Pettigrew, who designed this report and our beloved proofreader, Kelly Garvin. We especially appreciate the thorough reviews from Gina Chirichigno, Itai Dinour, Sanjiv Rao and Melissa Johnson Hewitt, whose suggestions greatly improved this report. Susan E. Eaton Director, The Sillerman Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy Professor of Practice in Social Policy The Heller School for Social Policy and Management Brandeis University Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Renewing the News
    Renewing the News alter Cronkite tion of everyday behavior, stepped to the podium and the vexing cultural and before a respectful audi- political challenges it has ence at Harvard one No- spawned in its unbound- Wvember evening in 1990. ed flood of information. An avuncular legend of broad- Though Cronkite spoke cast journalism, celebrated that evening from the apex as “the most trusted man in of American journalism, he America,” he was an obvious had begun his career at its choice to initiate an annual base: with a local report- lecture series at the Kennedy ing job at The Houston Post. School’s Shorenstein Center In 1990, that base appeared on Media, Politics and Policy. secure. Even in the age of Cronkite shared insider tales television, American news- from the 1950s and ’60s as he papers employed by far described the unfortunate ef- the most journalists and fects of television on Ameri- produced by far the most can politics: shallow debates, journalism, especially at shrinking soundbites, image the local level. The indus- over substance. try’s most profitable year The ninth of 11 questions he would not come until 2000. fielded pointed him toward the And then it collapsed. future. “There is the imminent Long supported by adver- emergence of a digital, global tisers drawn to the audi- information environment with Supporting journalism— ence they commanded, the instantaneous transmis- newspaper publishers sion of information…in many and democracy—after found themselves stunned forms almost anywhere,” his and stumbling across an questioner said. Combined the Internet eviscerated unfamiliar and treacher- with the proliferation of cable ous landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Society of Professional Journalists Foundation Board Of
    The Society of Professional Journalists Foundation Board of Directors Meeting Sept. 6, 2019 9 a.m. to Noon CDT San Antonio Grand Hyatt, Lone Star B San Antonio The foundation's mission is to perpetuate a free press as a cornerstone of our nation and our liberty. To ensure that the concept of self-government outlined by the Constitution survives and flourishes, the American people must be well informed. They need a free press to guide them in their personal decisions and in the management of their local and national communities. It is the role of journalists to provide fair, balanced and accurate information in a comprehensive, timely and understandable manner. AGENDA SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS FOUNDATION BOARD MEETING SAN ANTONIO GRAND HYATT, Lone Star A DATE: Sept. 6, 2019 TIME: 9 a.m. – Noon CDT 1. Call to order – Gratz 2. Roll Call – Albarado a. Gratz k. Evensen u. Leger b. Limor l. Fletcher v. Lehrman c. Albarado m. Gillman w. LoMonte d. Dubin n. Hall x. Gallagher Newberry e. Batts o. Hawes y. Pulliam f. Bethea p. Hsu z. Ross g. Bolden q. Jones aa. Schotz h. Brown r. Ketter bb. Tarquinio i. Carlson s. Kirtley j. Cuillier t. Kopen Katcef 3. Approval of minutes – Albarado Enter Executive Session 4. Talbott Talent Report – Leah York, Heather Rolinski Exit Executive Session 5. Remembering John Ensslin – Gratz 6. Foundation President’s Report – Gratz 7. SPJ President’s Report – Tarquinio 8. Treasurer’s Report – Dubin 9. Journalist on Call – Rod Hicks 10. Committee Reports – Gratz 11. Bylaws change – Gratz 12. Election 2 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the 2018-2019 Shorenstein Center Annual Report
    Annual Report 2018–2019 Contents Letter from the Director 2 2018–2019 Highlights 4 Areas of Focus Technology and Social Change Research Project 6 Misinformation Research 8 Digital Platforms and Democracy 10 News Quality Journalist’s Resource 12 The Goldsmith Awards 15 News Sustainability 18 Race & Equity 20 Events Annual Lectures 22 Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics 23 Salant Lecture on Freedom of the Press 33 Speaker Series 41 The Student Experience 43 Fellows 45 Staff, Faculty, Board, and Supporters 47 From the Director Like the air we breathe and the water we drink, the information we consume sustains the health of the body politic. Good information nourishes democracy; bad information poisons it. The mission of the Shorenstein Center is to support and protect the information ecosystem. This means promoting access to reliable information through our work with journalists, policymakers, civil society, and scholars, while also slowing the spread of bad information, from hate speech to “fake news” to all kinds of distortion and media manipulation. The public square has always had to contend with liars, propagandists, dividers, and demagogues. But the tools for creating toxic information are more powerful and widely available than ever before, and the effects more dangerous. How our generation responds to threats we did not foresee, fueled by technologies we have not contained, is the central challenge of our age. How do journalists cover the impact of misinformation without spreading it further? How do technology companies,
    [Show full text]
  • What and Who Are Fueling the Movement to Privatize Public Education — and Why You Should Care
    The Washington Post Answer Sheet Analysis What and who are fueling the movement to privatize public education — and why you should care by Valerie Strauss May 30 !Email the author This is an important article by author Joanne Barkan about the history of the movement to privatize U.S. public schools, which is now at the heart of the national debate about the future of publicly funded education in this country. We now have an education secretary, Betsy DeVos, who is admittedly doing everything she can to promote alternatives to traditional publicly funded education. Many state legislatures are helping her with programs using taxpayer money to fund private and religious education. Supporters of America’s public education system are concerned about what they say is an assault on the most important civic institution in the country. In this article, Barkan explains the history and current state of the privatization movement and what may lie ahead for the education system. She is a writer based in New York City and Truro, Mass. Her recent writing has focused on market-based public education reform in the United States, the intervention of private foundations in public policy, and the relationship between philanthropy and democracy. An earlier version of this article will be included in “The State, Business and Education,” edited by Gita Steiner-Khamsi and Alexandra Draxler (London: Edward Elgar Publishing, October 2018). I normally don’t include a list of references at the end of posts, but I am with Barkan’s article to show the broad range of sources she used for this comprehensive piece.
    [Show full text]
  • General Reading/Articles
    General Reading/Articles: Guidance of Sensitive Issues https://tltc.umd.edu/discussions 5 Guidelines to Sensitive Issues https://docs.google.com/document/d/10lC_S01uHr7KeIiAB_L2h2ixJKdx3oOOpiMauGU ETWM/edit?usp=sharing CommonSense Education resources on social-justice and equity-focused instruction ​ Educators tackle tough Conversations . virtually https://www.chalkbeat.org/2020/5/31/21276371/educators-tackle-tough-conversations-a bout-race-and-violence-this-time-virtually The Urgent Need for Anti-Racism Education https://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2019/08/14/the-urgent-need-for-anti-racist-education .html How to be an Anti-Racist Educator http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/education-update/oct19/vol61/num10/How -to-Be-an-Antiracist-Educator.aspx Talking about Race (National Museum of African American History and Culture) https://nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-about-race Talking to your kids about racism https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/31/how-talk-kids-racism-racial-viol ence-police-brutality/5288065002/ This article gives several examples of how teachers around the country are addressing these issues with students. There is a New Jersey teacher (Trenton) who is featured in the article! https://www.chalkbeat.org/2020/5/31/21276371/educators-tackle-tough-conversations-about-rac e-and-violence-this-time-virtually Everyday Democracy - Resources, Handouts on racial Equity, Stereotypes, Racism, etc. https://www.everyday-democracy.org/resources/handouts https://www.everyday-democracy.org/resources/facing-racism Why
    [Show full text]
  • April 14 - 15, 2021 2021 EXHIBITOR RE-ENVISION CONTEST RE-ENVISION YOUR WORK and WIN!
    April 14 - 15, 2021 2021 EXHIBITOR RE-ENVISION CONTEST RE-ENVISION YOUR WORK AND WIN! Win one of two $50 Amazon gift cards or a CONFERENCE Entry fee for Denver 2022. For contest form and instructions, click here. OR AT THE HECA BOOTH IN THE EXHIBIT HALL OR IN YOUR VIRTUAL SWAG BAG AT THE CONFERENCE! Drawings for the Amazon gift cards will be at the Closing Social. Denver Conference prize will be announced after close of May 31, 2021. 2O21 CONFERENCE AT-A-GLANCE WELCOME TO HECA’S 2021 VIRTUAL CONFERENCE! DURING THE 2-DAY CONFERENCE (AND THROUGH MAY 31, 2021). YOU WILL HAVE 24-HOUR ACCESS TO: Exhibitor booths College booths College Showcase videos Sessions (post-conference) Daily Schedule Wednesday, April 14th (Times in EST) Thursday, April 15th 10:30-11:30am Exhibit Hall / HECA Hub 10:30-11:30am Exhibit Hall / HECA Hub 11:30-11:45am Conference Welcome 11:30-12:30pm Special Guest Speaker: 11:45-12:45pm Heart of HECA Eric Hoover 12:45-1:45pm Keynote Speaker: 12:30-1:30pm Breakout Session D Rick Clark 1:30-4:00pm College Fair 1:45-2:00pm Break 4:00-4:15pm Break 2:00-3:00pm Breakout Session A 4:15-5:15pm Breakout Session E 3:00-3:30pm EXHIBIT HALL 5:15-5:45pm Exhibitor Showcase 3:30-4:00pm Exhibitor Showcase Session A Session C 4:00-4:30pm Exhibitor Showcase Session B 5:45-6:15pm Exhibitor Showcase 4:30-5:30pm Breakout Session B Session D 5:30-5:45pm Break 6:15-7:15pm Special Guest Speaker: 5:45-6:45pm Breakout Session C Anya Kamenetz 6:45-7:45pm RoundTable: UnPlugged 7:15-8:30pm Closing Social 7:45-8:30pm HECA Pub EXHIBITORS (LIVE) Wednesday & Thursday, 10:30am-11:30am EST Wednesday, 3:00pm-3:30pm EST EXHIBITOR SHOWCASES (LIVE) Wednesday, 3:30pm-4:30pm EST Thursday, 5:15pm-6:15pm EST COLLEGE FAIR (LIVE) Wednesday, 1:30pm-4:00pm EST Index Welcome.....................................................5 Acknowledgements...............................6 Special Thank You.................................
    [Show full text]
  • What We Talk About When We Talk About Impact: One News Organization’S Approach to Practicing Journalism with a Purpose
    What We Talk About When We Talk About Impact: One News Organization’s Approach to Practicing Journalism with a Purpose By Elizabeth Green, Philissa Cramer, and Anika Anand 1 I. Introduction The organization now called Chalkbeat began as two tiny operations on two different sides of the country. We were the definition of scrappy. Our New York City office was housed inside a basement. Our longest­range plans were made in the morning, for lunch. One day, having finally arranged our desktops in a logical design, we awoke to learn that our officemates had been forced to execute a midnight evacuation. The shared basement workspace, it turned out, was actually a squat. We were a news startup born in a time of exciting journalistic innovation, with our own original spin — local rather than national, single­subject rather than general interest, nonprofit rather than commercial. But we spent very little time thinking about this new world we were helping to build. Instead, we focused our curiosity on the universe we covered: the New York City and Colorado public schools and the fascinating national education reform movement that was enveloping them. We might have stayed that way forever, but by 2011, our situation had begun to change. Three years in, our websites — then called GothamSchools and EdNews Colorado; now Chalkbeat New York and Chalkbeat Colorado — were receiving tens of thousands of monthly visitors. Strange looks and press­pass bans were replaced by offers of exclusive access and angry fulminations when we failed to publish the morning news roundup exactly on time (or, in the case of our more anxious readers, concerned emails making sure we were still alive).
    [Show full text]
  • Storytelling and Social Media
    NIEMAN REPORTS Storytelling and Social Media HANNA, one of the subjects in “Maidan: Portraits from the Black Square,” Kiev, February 2014 Nieman Online From the Archives For some photojournalists, it’s the shots they didn’t take they remember best. In the Summer 1998 issue of Nieman Reports, Nieman Fellows Stan Grossfeld, David Turnley, Steve Northup, Stanley Forman, and Frank Van Riper reflect on the shots they missed, whether by mistake or by choice, in “The Best Picture I Never Took” series. Digital Strategy at The New York Times In a lengthy memo, The New York Times revealed that it hopes to double its “Made in Boston: Stories of Invention and Innovation” brought together, from left, author digital revenue to $800 million by 2020. Ben Mezrich, Boston Globe reporter Hiawatha Bray, author Steve Almond, WGBH’s “Innovation The paper plans to simplify subscriptions, Hub” host Kara Miller, NPR’s “On Point” host Tom Ashbrook, “Our Bodies, Ourselves” improve advertising and sponsorships, co-founder Judy Norsigian, journalist Laurie Penny, and MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito optimize for different mediums, and nieman.harvard.edu, events extend its international reach. No Comments An in-depth look at why seven major news organizations—Reuters, Mic, The Week, Popular Science, Recode, The Verge, and USA Today’s FTW—suspended user comments, the results of that decision, and Innovators “always said how these media outlets are using social no when other people media to encourage reader engagement. said yes and they always 5 Questions: Geraldine Brooks Former Wall Street Journal foreign said yes when other correspondent and Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Geraldine Brooks talks with her old Columbia Journalism School classmate people said no.
    [Show full text]
  • Choices Worth Making: Creating, Sustaining and Expanding Diverse Magnet Schools Acknowledgements
    A Manual for Local Stakeholders CHOICES WORTH MAKING: CREATING, SUSTAINING AND EXPANDING DIVERSE MAGNET SCHOOLS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge Gary Orfield and Erica Frankenberg for the guidance and insight as we developed the manual. We also thank Rachel Levy and Brian Woodward for their dedicated research assistance. We appreciate Gina Chirichingo for her work on the section dealing with political will, portions of which are reprinted from the 2010 Civil Rights Project manual, Integrating Suburban Schools. Other portions of the manual are reprinted or adapted from prior Civil Rights Project reports by Erica Frankenberg and Genevieve Siegel- Hawley on magnet schools, as well as a chapter on magnet schools by the same co-authors from the 2013 book, Educational Delusions? Why Choice Can Deepen Inequality and How To Make Schools Fair (UC Press). Written by: Jennifer Ayscue, Rachel Levy, Genevieve Siegel-Hawley, and Brian Woodward Production: Layout: Laurie Russman Lauren Gonzalez, Principium Studio © 2017 Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose of this Manual 2 Why Districts Should Consider Intentionally Diverse Magnets 4 Evidence for Intentionally Diverse Magnets 4 The Background of Magnet Schools 6 Developing a Diverse and Equitable Magnet School 8 First Door Strategies to Enroll a Diverse Student Body 8 Second Door Strategies to Facilitate Successful Integration of Diverse Student Groups 16 Sustaining a Magnet School 22 How to Build Political Will for Diverse and Equitable Magnet Schools 24 Further Reading 31 Resources 32 Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles 2 I CHOICES WORTH MAKING: CREATING, SUSTAINING AND EXPANDING DIVERSE MAGNET SCHOOLS PURPOSE OF THIS MANUAL he purpose of this manual is to support Magnet schools represent unique school districts and schools in developing diverse and equitable magnet programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Education in Non-Religious Schools: a Comparative Study of Pakistan and Bangladesh
    Commonwealth & Comparative Politics ISSN: 1466-2043 (Print) 1743-9094 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fccp20 Religious Education in Non-Religious Schools: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Bangladesh Matthew J. Nelson To cite this article: Matthew J. Nelson (2008) Religious Education in Non-Religious Schools: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Bangladesh, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 46:3, 271-295, DOI: 10.1080/14662040802176574 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040802176574 Published online: 24 Jun 2008. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 258 Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fccp20 Commonwealth & Comparative Politics Vol. 46, No. 3, 271–295, July 2008 Religious Education in Non- Religious Schools: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Bangladesh MATTHEW J. NELSON School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London ABSTRACT In both Pakistan and Bangladesh, most parents seek to provide their children with a ‘hybrid’ education, combining both religious and non-religious components (simultaneously). In Pakistan, however, the so-called ‘non-religious’ side of this education – for example, in government and non-elite private schools – tends to be associated with a particular understanding of religion, one that remains persistently apprehensive about the treatment of and, in many ways, even the acknowledgement of, religious, sectarian, ethnic, and linguistic diversity. Keeping this in mind, scholars and policy makers with an interest in the relationship between education and citizenship – particularly insofar as this relationship is tied to the challenge of cultural diversity – would do well to focus more of their attention on competing expressions of ‘religion’ in the context of (ostensibly) ‘non-religious’ schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago National College Fair Saturday, October 5, 2019 Mccormick Place – Lakeside Center, Hall D1
    suntimes.com | The Hardest-Working Paper in America | Thursday, October 3, 2019 | 1 List of Schools and Exhibit The National Association for Hall Map College Admission Counseling INSIDE Chicago National College Fair Saturday, October 5, 2019 McCormick Place – Lakeside Center, Hall D1 Register Now @ www.gotomyncf.com OUT OF STATE? PAY THE IN-STATE RATE! www.ferris.eduadno=STM000109375101 2 | Thursday, October 3, 2019 | The Hardest-Working Paper in America | suntimes.com RANKED IN THE TOPTEN BEST VALUE BEST BANG MOST TRANSFORMATIVE UNIVERSITIES FOR YOUR BUCK UNIVERSITIES On what do Money Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, and Washington Monthly agree? The University of Illinois at Chicago can help you transform your potential into success. Come speak with our team at booths 667-670 and learn how we’re committed to helping you make your mark on the world. adno=STM000109364101 suntimes.com | The Hardest-Working Paper in America | Thursday, October 3, 2019 | 3 2019 Chicago National Tips for Attending About College Fair Committee a NACAC National Megan O’Rourke Providence College (Chairperson) Mike Melinder University of Iowa (Chairperson) Rachel O’Connell Augustana College (Chairperson) College Fair The National Association for College Admis- Before the Fair... sion Counseling (NACAC), founded in 1937, is Scott Carlson University of Illinois at an organization of more than 15,000 profession- Urbana-Champaign (Chairperson) 1. Register online for the fair at www.gotomyncf.com als from around the world dedicated to serving to receive a barcode for easy onsite access to students as they make choices about pursuing Heather Chase Miami University, Oxford Ohio college representatives.
    [Show full text]